Gabor transform

The Gabor transform is invertible. Because it is over-complete, the original signal can be recovered in a variety of ways. For example, the "unwindowing" approach can be used for any ${\displaystyle \tau _{0}\in (-\infty ,\infty )}$:

${\displaystyle x(t)=e^{\pi (t-\tau _{0})^{2}}{\frac {1}{2\pi }}\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }G_{x}(\tau _{0},\omega )e^{j\omega t}\,d\omega }$

Alternatively, all of the time components can be combined together:

${\displaystyle x(t)=\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }{\frac {1}{2\pi }}\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }G_{x}(\tau ,\omega )e^{j\omega t}\,d\omega \,d\tau }$

The Gabor transform has many properties like those of the Fourier transform. These properties are listed in the following tables.

	Signal	Gabor transform	Remarks
	${\displaystyle x(t)\,}$	${\displaystyle G_{x}(\tau ,\omega )=\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }x(t)e^{-\pi (t-\tau )^{2}}e^{-j\omega t}\,dt}$
1	${\displaystyle a\cdot x(t)+b\cdot y(t)\,}$	${\displaystyle a\cdot G_{x}(\tau ,\omega )+b\cdot G_{y}(\tau ,\omega )\,}$	Linearity property
2	${\displaystyle x(t-t_{0})\,}$	${\displaystyle G_{x}(\tau -t_{0},\omega )e^{-j\omega t_{0}}\,}$	Shifting property
3	${\displaystyle x(t)e^{j\omega _{0}t}\,}$	${\displaystyle G_{x}(\tau ,\omega -\omega _{0})\,}$	Modulation property

		Remarks
1	${\displaystyle \int _{-\infty }^{\infty }\left|G_{x}(\tau ,\omega )\right|^{2}\,d\omega =\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }\left|x(t)\right|^{2}e^{-2\pi (t-\tau )^{2}}dt\approx \int _{\tau -1.9143}^{\tau +1.9143}\left|x(t)\right|^{2}e^{-2\pi (t-\tau )^{2}}dt}$	Power integration property
2	${\displaystyle \int _{-\infty }^{\infty }\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }G_{x}(\tau ,\omega )G_{y}^{*}(\tau ,\omega )\,d\omega \,d\tau =\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }x(t)y^{*}(t)\,d\tau }$	Energy sum property
3	${\displaystyle {\begin{cases}\displaystyle \int _{-\infty }^{\infty }\left|G_{x}(\tau ,\omega )\right|^{2}d\omega <e^{-2\pi (t-t_{0})^{2}}\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }\left|G_{x}(\tau _{0},\omega )\right|^{2}\,d\omega$ ;&{\text{if }}x(t)=0{\text{ for }}t>t_{0}\\[12pt]\displaystyle \int _{-\infty }^{\infty }\left|G_{x}(\tau ,\omega )\right|^{2}\,d\tau <e^{-(\omega -\omega _{0})^{2}}\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }\left|G_{x}(\tau ,\omega _{0})\right|^{2}\,d\tau ;&{\text{if }}X(\omega )=FT[x(t)]=0{\text{ for }}\omega >\omega _{0}\end{cases}}}	Power decay property
4	${\displaystyle \int _{-\infty }^{\infty }G_{x}(\tau ,\omega )e^{j\omega t}\,d\omega =2\pi e^{-\pi \tau ^{2}}x(0)}$	Recovery property

Time/frequency distribution.

The main application of the Gabor transform is used in time–frequency analysis. Take the following function as an example. The input signal has 1 Hz frequency component when t ≤ 0 and has 2 Hz frequency component when t > 0

${\displaystyle x(t)={\begin{cases}\cos(2\pi t)&{\text{for }}t\leq 0,\\\cos(4\pi t)&{\text{for }}t>0.\end{cases}}}$

But if the total bandwidth available is 5 Hz, other frequency bands except x(t) are wasted. Through time–frequency analysis by applying the Gabor transform, the available bandwidth can be known and those frequency bands can be used for other applications and bandwidth is saved. The right side picture shows the input signal x(t) and the output of the Gabor transform. As was our expectation, the frequency distribution can be separated into two parts. One is t ≤ 0 and the other is t > 0. The white part is the frequency band occupied by x(t) and the black part is not used. Note that for each point in time there is both a negative (upper white part) and a positive (lower white part) frequency component.

A discrete version of Gabor representation

${\displaystyle y(t)=\sum _{m=-\infty }^{\infty }\sum _{n=-\infty }^{\infty }C_{nm}\cdot g_{nm}(t)}$

with ${\displaystyle g_{nm}(t)=s(t-m\tau _{0})\cdot e^{j\Omega nt}}$

can be derived easily by discretizing the Gabor-basis-function in these equations. Hereby the continuous parameter t is replaced by the discrete time k. Furthermore the now finite summation limit in Gabor representation has to be considered. In this way, the sampled signal y(k) is split into M time frames of length N. According to ${\displaystyle \Omega \leq {\tfrac {2\pi }{\tau _{0}}}}$, the factor Ω for critical sampling is ${\displaystyle \Omega ={\tfrac {2\pi }{N}}}$.

Similar to the DFT (discrete Fourier transformation) a frequency domain split into N discrete partitions is obtained. An inverse transformation of these N spectral partitions then leads to N values y(k) for the time window, which consists of N sample values. For overall M time windows with N sample values, each signal y(k) contains K = N ${\displaystyle \cdot }$ M sample values: (the discrete Gabor representation)

${\displaystyle y(k)=\sum _{m=0}^{M-1}\sum _{n=0}^{N-1}C_{nm}\cdot g_{nm}(k)}$

with ${\displaystyle g_{nm}(k)=s(k-mN)\cdot e^{j\Omega nk}}$

According to the equation above, the N ${\displaystyle \cdot }$ M coefficients ${\displaystyle C_{nm}}$ correspond to the number of sample values K of the signal.

For over-sampling ${\displaystyle \Omega }$ is set to ${\displaystyle \Omega \leq {\tfrac {2\pi }{N}}={\tfrac {2\pi }{N^{\prime }}}}$ with N′ > N, which results in N′ > N summation coefficients in the second sum of the discrete Gabor representation. In this case, the number of obtained Gabor-coefficients would be M${\displaystyle \cdot }$N′ > K. Hence, more coefficients than sample values are available and therefore a redundant representation would be achieved.

As in short time Fourier transform, the resolution in time and frequency domain can be adjusted by choosing different window function width. In Gabor transform cases, by adding variance ${\displaystyle \sigma }$, as following equation:

The scaled (normalized) Gaussian window denotes as:

${\displaystyle W_{\text{gaussian}}(t)=e^{-\sigma \pi t^{2}}}$

So the Scaled Gabor transform can be written as:

${\displaystyle G_{x}(t,f)={\sqrt[{4}]{\sigma }}\textstyle \int _{-\infty }^{\infty }\displaystyle e^{-\sigma \pi (\tau -t)^{2}}e^{-j2\pi f\tau }x(\tau )d\tau \qquad }$

With a large ${\displaystyle \sigma }$, the window function will be narrow, causing higher resolution in time domain but lower resolution in frequency domain. Similarly, a small ${\displaystyle \sigma }$ will lead to a wide window, with higher resolution in frequency domain but lower resolution in time domain.

When processing temporal signals, data from the future cannot be accessed, which leads to problems if attempting to use Gabor functions for processing real-time signals. A time-causal analogue of the Gabor filter has been developed in [2] based on replacing the Gaussian kernel in the Gabor function with a time-causal and time-recursive kernel referred to as the time-causal limit kernel. In this way, time-frequency analysis based on the resulting complex-valued extension of the time-causal limit kernel makes it possible to capture essentially similar transformations of a temporal signal as the Gabor function can, and corresponding to the Heisenberg group, see [2] for further details.

• Gabor filter
• Gabor wavelet
• Gabor atom
• Time-frequency representation
• S transform
• Short-time Fourier transform
• Wigner distribution function

• D. Gabor, Theory of Communication, Part 1, J. Inst. of Elect. Eng. Part III, Radio and Communication, vol 93, p. 429 1946 (http://genesis.eecg.toronto.edu/gabor1946.pdf)
• Jian-Jiun Ding, Time frequency analysis and wavelet transform class note, the Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, 2007.