Gender in Dutch grammar

Traditionally, nouns in Dutch, like in more conservative Germanic languages, such as German and Icelandic, have retained the three grammatical genders found in the older forms of all Germanic languages: masculine, feminine, or neuter. Almost all Dutch speakers maintain the neuter gender, which has distinct adjective inflection, definite article and some pronouns. The picture is less clear for the masculine and feminine gender, because in the standard language the adjective inflection of both is identical, and both share the same article and the same demonstrative pronouns. There are clearer grammatical differences in the definite articles in the genitive (masculine des vs feminine der), demonstrative determiners (masculine diens vs feminine dier) and relative pronouns (masculine wiens vs feminine wier), but usage of those is mostly limited to formal or literary language. The standard language mostly distinguishes masculine and feminine genders of animate nouns by the use of the personal pronoun, which are hij/hem for masculine nouns and zij/haar for feminine nouns and by corresponding possessive pronouns, zijn/zijne for masculine nouns and haar/hare for feminine nouns; all of those have additional unstressed reduced forms. It is also distinguished in the case forms of the definite article and some pronouns, but those have fallen out of use and are only retained in literary or archaic usage and fixed expressions.

In Belgium and southern dialects of the Netherlands, the distinction between the three genders is usually, but not always, maintained, and can be told from articles, adjectives and demonstrative pronouns. As a consequence, many speakers in these regions are still aware of the traditional genders and will, in standard language, also (and equally correctly) refer to words that were traditionally feminine with zij, whereas traditionally masculine words retain the use of hij. In the case of persons and animals of known sex the pronouns used are generally determined by the biological sex rather than by the grammatical gender of the word.

In most remaining parts of the Netherlands and in Suriname, the distinction between masculine and feminine nouns has disappeared, producing a common gender that uses the same inflections and pronouns as the original masculine. The pronouns hij and zij are used when the referent has a natural gender, so hij is used for a male person, zij for a female person. However, when the noun is inanimate and has no natural gender, the pronoun hij is used not only for traditionally masculine nouns, but for traditionally feminine nouns as well. Thus, the situation in these areas resembles that of English, although there is still a distinction among inanimate nouns between common hij and neuter het (English uses it for both, having lost all gender distinctions in almost all inanimate nouns, with few exceptions such as watercraft, aircraft, buildings and countries).

In the written tradition, which forms the base for the (prescribed) standard language, there are some remains of the traditional three genders. The following table shows the use of various articles and pronouns in the standard form of Dutch, as well as how the use of gender in the two language areas aligns with this. In areas maintaining the three genders, there is no common gender. In areas with only two genders, only nouns referring to people have a distinction between masculine and feminine; all other nouns that are not neuter are common.

The standard as prescribed by the Dutch Language Union categorises most nouns into one of four categories:

• neuter, marked o (for onzijdig) in Dutch or n in English;
• masculine, marked m;
• feminine, marked v (for vrouwelijk) in Dutch or f in English; and
• feminine but optionally masculine, marked v/m in Dutch or f/m in English.

Thus, the standard only mandates the feminine gender for a subset of all historically feminine nouns. These are nouns with an overtly recognizable feminine suffix. However, this distinction is maintained only in formal or written standard Dutch, whereas many speakers do not make such a distinction in informal speech; they use only the common gender. Such speakers must therefore remember which endings are feminine, because they cannot rely on their own language intuition. Although some speakers do follow the standard in this respect, others do not and simply use the genders the way they are accustomed to them in their own everyday speech (either masculine/feminine/neuter or common/neuter).

In more formal, poetic or archaic language, a stronger distinction exists between the masculine and feminine genders, especially in the genitive forms as shown in the table below (although the distinctions in the bottom row are still commonly applied in informal speech):

The trend so far is towards the increasing use of the common gender, at the expense of the masculine/feminine distinction. Although this process has long been completed in the spoken language of the north, the three-gender structure is still widespread in the south, though some suggest it is slowly losing ground due to the increase of language contact through mass media like television and the Internet. Some dictionaries have dropped the distinction between the two genders entirely, preferring to mark words with their definite article de (common) or het (neuter), whereas others like the Woordenboek der Nederlandse Taal—the largest Dutch dictionary—retain it. Because the feminine gender of nouns tends to be respected in formal or written language, which tends to follow the standard more strictly, this sometimes also results in hypercorrection, caused by the perceived formality of the feminine gender, with feminine pronouns occasionally used for nouns that are historically masculine, and even for nouns that are neuter.

The following list reflects the use of gender that is prescribed for standard Dutch and used by the Language Union and educational material for teaching gender. It is not exhaustive, and covers only cases that follow some recognizable pattern. Many words have unpredictable gender and simply have to be memorized (and will be f/m in the standard, if not neuter).

Southern Dutch consists roughly of all dialects south of the river Meuse. In these dialects, there was a tendency towards accusativism in early modern Dutch (16th and 17th centuries). This was the tendency to use the accusative case in the role of the nominative. When cases fell out of use later, the nominative was the one that survived, but in areas with accusativism these forms historically belonged to the accusative case. Unlike the old nominative, the accusative had a clear distinction between masculine and feminine forms. As it was these forms that survived in southern Dutch, the genders remained naturally distinct, and remain so up to the present day.

In addition, Southern Dutch developed a separate indefinite article for neuter words—"e" or "ee(n)"—which is pronounced as a schwa (IPA: ə).[3][4][5] Similar to English "an" versus "a", this article is not used when the following word starts with a vowel or a h-; rather "een" ('n) is used in those cases.

The following table shows the points where the southern dialects differ from the standard language. As the dialects themselves are not standardised, different forms may be found in different areas, although differences have lessened in the Tussentaal, the Dutch regiolect in the Region of Flanders.

Example 1: (vrouw is feminine)

• Southern: Heeft u mijn vrouw gezien?
• Standard: Heeft u mijn vrouw gezien?
• English: Have you seen my wife?

Example 2: (auto and boom are masculine)

• Southern: Ik heb mijnen auto onder dienen boom geparkeerd.
• Standard: Ik heb mijn auto onder die boom geparkeerd.
• English: I parked my car beneath that tree.

Example 3: (appartement and dorp are neuter)

• Southern Ik woon in een appartement in e klein dorp.
• Standard: Ik woon in een appartement in een klein dorp.
• English: I live in an apartment in a small village.

Unlike English (with the use of "they" as the singular gender-neutral pronoun) or Swedish (which developed the new gender-neutral pronoun "hen"), Dutch did not develop a gender-neutral pronoun. As a consequence, Dutch employs a variety of means to accommodate cases where the gender of a person is not known. Standard solutions include the use of degene ("the one"; unstressed) and diegene ("that one"; stressed). More formally, the word alwie ("any(one) who") may be employed.

In recent years, 'hen', 'die' (demonstrative pronoun) and 'hun' and 'diens' (possessive) gained more popularity but is not yet in common use.

As Dutch is closely related to German, Dutch words tend to have the same gender as their close cognates in German. That is, Dutch has common gender (de) where German has masculine (der) or feminine (die), and Dutch has neuter (het) where German has neuter (das). The exceptions are so few that they can be noted specially, which can be helpful for language learners:

• de radio : das Radio (radio)
• de telefoon : das Telefon (telephone)
• het bericht : der Bericht (report)

• Dutch grammar
• Grammatical gender

• Chapter 2 of van Berkum, J.J.A. (1996) The psycholinguistics of grammatical gender: Studies in language comprehension and production, "The linguistics of gender" (PDF)
• Geerts, G. (2003) [1966]. "Genus en geslacht in de Gouden Eeuw. Een bijdrage tot de studie van de nominale klassifikatie en daarmee samenhangende adnominale flexievormen en pronominale verschijnselen in Hollands taalgebruik van de zeventiende eeuw". Retrieved 2010-09-24. (in Dutch)