Manufacturing

Manufacturing is the creation or production of goods with the help of equipment, labor, machines, tools, and chemical or biological processing or formulation. It is the essence of the secondary sector of the economy.[1] The term may refer to a range of human activity, from handicraft to high-tech, but it is most commonly applied to industrial design, in which raw materials from the primary sector are transformed into finished goods on a large scale. Such goods may be sold to other manufacturers for the production of other more complex products (such as aircraft, household appliances, furniture, sports equipment or automobiles), or distributed via the tertiary industry to end users and consumers (usually through wholesalers, who in turn sell to retailers, who then sell them to individual customers).

For the functional constituency in Hong Kong elections, see Manufacturing (constituency).

Manufacturing of an automobile by Tesla
Part of a series of articles on
Machine industry
Mill
Manufacturing methods
Industrial technologies
Information and communication
Process control

Manufacturing engineering is the field of engineering that designs and optimizes the manufacturing process, or the steps through which raw materials are transformed into a final product. The manufacturing process begins with the product design, and materials specification. These materials are then modified through manufacturing to become the desired product.

Modern manufacturing includes all intermediate processes involved in the production and integration of a product's components. Some industries, such as semiconductor and steel manufacturers, use the term fabrication instead.

The manufacturing sector is closely connected with the engineering and industrial design industries.

Etymology

The Modern English word manufacture is likely derived from the Middle French manufacture ("process of making") which itself originates from the Classical Latin manū ("hand") and Middle French facture ("making"). Alternatively, the English word may have been independently formed from the earlier English manufacture ("made by human hands") and fracture.[2] Its earliest usage in the English language was recorded in the mid-16th century to refer to the making of products by hand.[3][4]

History and development

Prehistory and ancient history
See also: Industry (archaeology), Prehistoric technology, and Ancient technology
Flint stone core for making blades in Negev, Israel, c. 40000 BP
A late Bronze Age sword or dagger blade now on display at the National Archaeological Museum in France

Human ancestors manufactured objects using stone and other tools long before the emergence of Homo sapiens about 200,000 years ago.[5] The earliest methods of stone tool making, known as the Oldowan "industry", date back to at least 2.3 million years ago,[6] with the earliest direct evidence of tool usage found in Ethiopia within the Great Rift Valley, dating back to 2.5 million years ago.[7] To manufacture a stone tool, a "core" of hard stone with specific flaking properties (such as flint) was struck with a hammerstone. This flaking produced sharp edges that could be used as tools, primarily in the form of choppers or scrapers.[8] These tools greatly aided the early humans in their hunter-gatherer lifestyle to form other tools out of softer materials such as bone and wood.[9] The Middle Paleolithic, approximately 300,000 years ago, saw the introduction of the prepared-core technique, where multiple blades could be rapidly formed from a single core stone.[8] Pressure flaking, in which a wood, bone, or antler punch could be used to shape a stone very finely was developed during the Upper Paleolithic, beginning approximately 40,000 years ago.[10] During the Neolithic period, polished stone tools were manufactured from a variety of hard rocks such as flint, jade, jadeite, and greenstone. The polished axes were used alongside other stone tools including projectiles, knives, and scrapers, as well as tools manufactured from organic materials such as wood, bone, and antler.[11]

Copper smelting is believed to have originated when the technology of pottery kiln allowed sufficiently high temperatures.[12] The concentration of various elements such as arsenic increase with depth in copper ore deposits and smelting of these ores yields arsenical bronze, which can be sufficiently work-hardened to be suitable for manufacturing tools.[12] Bronze is an alloy of copper with tin; the latter being found in relatively few deposits globally caused a long time to elapse before true tin bronze became widespread. During the Bronze Age, bronze was a major improvement over stone as a material for making tools, both because of its mechanical properties like strength and ductility and because it could be cast in molds to make intricately shaped objects. Bronze significantly advanced shipbuilding technology with better tools and bronze nails, which replaced the old method of attaching boards of the hull with cord woven through drilled holes.[13] The Iron Age is conventionally defined by the widespread manufacturing of weapons and tools using iron and steel rather than bronze.[14] Iron smelting is more difficult than tin and copper smelting because smelted iron requires hot-working and can be melted only in specially designed furnaces. The place and time for the discovery of iron smelting is not known, partly because of the difficulty of distinguishing metal extracted from nickel-containing ores from hot-worked meteoritic iron.[15]

During the growth of the ancient civilizations, many ancient technologies resulted from advances in manufacturing. Several of the six classic simple machines were invented in Mesopotamia.[16] Mesopotamians have been credited with the invention of the wheel. The wheel and axle mechanism first appeared with the potter's wheel, invented in Mesopotamia (modern Iraq) during the 5th millennium BC.[17] Egyptian paper made from papyrus, as well as pottery, were mass-produced and exported throughout the Mediterranean basin. Early construction techniques used by the Ancient Egyptians made use of bricks composed mainly of clay, sand, silt, and other minerals.[18]

Medieval and early modern
A stocking frame at Ruddington Framework Knitters' Museum in Ruddington, England

The Middle Ages witnessed new inventions, innovations in the ways of managing traditional means of production, and economic growth. Papermaking, a 2nd-century Chinese technology, was carried to the Middle East when a group of Chinese papermakers were captured in the 8th century.[19] Papermaking technology was spread to Europe by the Umayyad conquest of Hispania.[20] A paper mill was established in Sicily in the 12th century. In Europe the fiber to make pulp for making paper was obtained from linen and cotton rags. Lynn Townsend White Jr. credited the spinning wheel with increasing the supply of rags, which led to cheap paper, which was a factor in the development of printing.[21] Due to the casting of cannon, the blast furnace came into widespread use in France in the mid 15th century. The blast furnace had been used in China since the 4th century BC.[12] The stocking frame, which was invented in 1598, increased a knitter's number of knots per minute from 100 to 1000.[22]

First and Second Industrial Revolutions
Main articles: Industrial Revolution and Second Industrial Revolution
An 1835 illustration of a Roberts Loom weaving shed

The Industrial Revolution was the transition to new manufacturing processes in Europe and the United States from 1760 to the 1830s.[23] This transition included going from hand production methods to machines, new chemical manufacturing and iron production processes, the increasing use of steam power and water power, the development of machine tools and the rise of the mechanized factory system. The Industrial Revolution also led to an unprecedented rise in the rate of population growth. Textiles were the dominant industry of the Industrial Revolution in terms of employment, value of output and capital invested. The textile industry was also the first to use modern production methods.[24]: 40  Rapid industrialization first began in Britain, starting with mechanized spinning in the 1780s,[25] with high rates of growth in steam power and iron production occurring after 1800. Mechanized textile production spread from Great Britain to continental Europe and the United States in the early 19th century, with important centres of textiles, iron and coal emerging in Belgium and the United States and later textiles in France.[24]

An economic recession occurred from the late 1830s to the early 1840s when the adoption of the Industrial Revolution's early innovations, such as mechanized spinning and weaving, slowed down and their markets matured. Innovations developed late in the period, such as the increasing adoption of locomotives, steamboats and steamships, hot blast iron smelting and new technologies, such as the electrical telegraph, were widely introduced in the 1840s and 1850s, were not powerful enough to drive high rates of growth. Rapid economic growth began to occur after 1870, springing from a new group of innovations in what has been called the Second Industrial Revolution. These innovations included new steel making processes, mass-production, assembly lines, electrical grid systems, the large-scale manufacture of machine tools and the use of increasingly advanced machinery in steam-powered factories.[24][26][27][28]

Building on improvements in vacuum pumps and materials research, incandescent light bulbs became practical for general use in the late 1870s. This invention had a profound effect on the workplace because factories could now have second and third shift workers.[29] Shoe production was mechanized during the mid 19th century.[30] Mass production of sewing machines and agricultural machinery such as reapers occurred in the mid to late 19th century.[31] The mass production of bicycles started in the 1880s.[31] Steam-powered factories became widespread, although the conversion from water power to steam occurred in England earlier than in the U.S.[32]

Modern manufacturing
Bell Aircraft's assembly plant in Wheatfield, New York in 1944

Electrification of factories, which had begun gradually in the 1890s after the introduction of the practical DC motor and the AC motor, was fastest between 1900 and 1930. This was aided by the establishment of electric utilities with central stations and the lowering of electricity prices from 1914 to 1917.[33] Electric motors allowed more flexibility in manufacturing and required less maintenance than line shafts and belts. Many factories witnessed a 30% increase in output owing to the increasing shift to electric motors. Electrification enabled modern mass production, and the biggest impact of early mass production was in the manufacturing of everyday items, such as at the Ball Brothers Glass Manufacturing Company, which electrified its mason jar plant in Muncie, Indiana, U.S. around 1900. The new automated process used glass blowing machines to replace 210 craftsman glass blowers and helpers. A small electric truck was now used to handle 150 dozen bottles at a time whereas previously used hand trucks could only carry 6 dozen bottles at a time. Electric mixers replaced men with shovels handling sand and other ingredients that were fed into the glass furnace. An electric overhead crane replaced 36 day laborers for moving heavy loads across the factory.[34]

Mass production was popularized in the late 1910s and 1920s by Henry Ford's Ford Motor Company,[35] which introduced electric motors to the then-well-known technique of chain or sequential production. Ford also bought or designed and built special purpose machine tools and fixtures such as multiple spindle drill presses that could drill every hole on one side of an engine block in one operation and a multiple head milling machine that could simultaneously machine 15 engine blocks held on a single fixture. All of these machine tools were arranged systematically in the production flow and some had special carriages for rolling heavy items into machining positions. Production of the Ford Model T used 32,000 machine tools.[36]

Lean manufacturing, also known as just-in-time manufacturing, was developed in Japan in the 1930s. It is a production method aimed primarily at reducing times within the production system as well as response times from suppliers and to customers.[37][38] It was introduced in Australia in the 1950s by the British Motor Corporation (Australia) at its Victoria Park plant in Sydney, from where the idea later migrated to Toyota.[39] News spread to western countries from Japan in 1977 in two English-language articles: one referred to the methodology as the "Ohno system", after Taiichi Ohno, who was instrumental in its development within Toyota.[40] The other article, by Toyota authors in an international journal, provided additional details.[41] Finally, those and other publicity were translated into implementations, beginning in 1980 and then quickly multiplying throughout the industry in the United States and other countries.[42]

Manufacturing strategy

According to a "traditional" view of manufacturing strategy, there are five key dimensions along which the performance of manufacturing can be assessed: cost, quality, dependability, flexibility and innovation.[43] In regard to manufacturing performance, Wickham Skinner, who has been called "the father of manufacturing strategy",[44] adopted the concept of "focus",[45] with an implication that a business cannot perform at the highest level along all five dimensions and must therefore select one or two competitive priorities. This view led to the theory of "trade offs" in manufacturing strategy.[46] Similarly, Elizabeth Haas wrote in 1987 about the delivery of value in manufacturing for customers in terms of "lower prices, greater service responsiveness or higher quality".[47] The theory of "trade offs" has subsequently being debated and questioned,[46] but Skinner wrote in 1992 that at that time "enthusiasm for the concepts of 'manufacturing strategy' [had] been higher", noting that in academic papers, executive courses and case studies, levels of interest were "bursting out all over".[48]

Manufacturing writer Terry Hill has commented that manufacturing is often seen as a less "strategic" business activity than functions such as marketing and finance, and that manufacturing managers have "come late" to business strategy-making discussions, where as a result they make only a reactive contribution.[49][50]

Industrial policy
Main article: Industrial policy

Economics of manufacturing

Emerging technologies have offered new growth methods in advanced manufacturing employment opportunities, for example in the Manufacturing Belt in the United States. Manufacturing provides important material support for national infrastructure and also for national defense.

On the other hand, most manufacturing processes may involve significant social and environmental costs. The clean-up costs of hazardous waste, for example, may outweigh the benefits of a product that creates it. Hazardous materials may expose workers to health risks. These costs are now well known and there is effort to address them by improving efficiency, reducing waste, using industrial symbiosis, and eliminating harmful chemicals.

The negative costs of manufacturing can also be addressed legally. Developed countries regulate manufacturing activity with labor laws and environmental laws. Across the globe, manufacturers can be subject to regulations and pollution taxes to offset the environmental costs of manufacturing activities. Labor unions and craft guilds have played a historic role in the negotiation of worker rights and wages. Environment laws and labor protections that are available in developed nations may not be available in the third world. Tort law and product liability impose additional costs on manufacturing. These are significant dynamics in the ongoing process, occurring over the last few decades, of manufacture-based industries relocating operations to "developing-world" economies where the costs of production are significantly lower than in "developed-world" economies.

Finance

From a financial perspective, the goal of the manufacturing industry is mainly to achieve cost benefits per unit produced, which in turn leads to cost reductions in product prices for the market towards end customers.[51] This relative cost reduction towards the market, is how manufacturing firms secure their profit margins.[52]

Safety

Manufacturing has unique health and safety challenges and has been recognized by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) as a priority industry sector in the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA) to identify and provide intervention strategies regarding occupational health and safety issues.[53][54]

Manufacturing and investment
Capacity use in manufacturing in Germany and the United States

Surveys and analyses of trends and issues in manufacturing and investment around the world focus on such things as:

  • The nature and sources of the considerable variations that occur cross-nationally in levels of manufacturing and wider industrial-economic growth;
  • Competitiveness; and
  • Attractiveness to foreign direct investors.

In addition to general overviews, researchers have examined the features and factors affecting particular key aspects of manufacturing development. They have compared production and investment in a range of Western and non-Western countries and presented case studies of growth and performance in important individual industries and market-economic sectors.[55][56]

On June 26, 2009, Jeff Immelt, the CEO of General Electric, called for the United States to increase its manufacturing base employment to 20% of the workforce, commenting that the U.S. has outsourced too much in some areas and can no longer rely on the financial sector and consumer spending to drive demand.[57] Further, while U.S. manufacturing performs well compared to the rest of the U.S. economy, research shows that it performs poorly compared to manufacturing in other high-wage countries.[58] A total of 3.2 million – one in six U.S. manufacturing jobs – have disappeared between 2000 and 2007.[59] In the UK, EEF the manufacturers organisation has led calls for the UK economy to be rebalanced to rely less on financial services and has actively promoted the manufacturing agenda.

Major manufacturing nations
See also: Outline of manufacturing § By country

According to the United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), China is the top manufacturer worldwide by 2019 output, producing 28.7% of the total global manufacturing output, followed by the United States, Japan, Germany, and India.[60][61]

UNIDO also publishes a Competitive Industrial Performance (CIP) Index, which measures the competitive manufacturing ability of different nations. The CIP Index combines a nation's gross manufacturing output with other factors like high-tech capability and the nation's impact on the world economy. Germany topped the 2020 CIP Index, followed by China, South Korea, the United States, and Japan.[62][63]

List of countries by manufacturing output

These are the top 50 countries by total value of manufacturing output in U.S. dollars for its noted year according to World Bank.[64]

List of countries by manufacturing output
Rank Country or region Millions of $US Year
 World16,350,2072021
1 China4,975,6142022
2 United States2,497,1312021
3 Japan1,025,0922021
4 Germany751,3382022
5 South Korea456,6002021
6 India446,5042021
7 Italy319,8432021
8 United Kingdom279,3892021
9 France269,7972021
10 Russia256,9582021
11 Mexico232,1072021
12 Indonesia228,3252021
13 Ireland184,3062021
14 Turkey179,2292021
15 Canada170,2222018
16 Spain161,4262021
17 Brazil155,1922021
18  Switzerland153,1322021
19 Thailand136,6822021
20 Poland116,6722021
21 Netherlands110,4602021
22 Saudi Arabia108,8202021
23 Bangladesh88,3972021
24 Malaysia87,5532021
25 Australia85,8592021
26 Singapore83,6622021
27 Argentina81,5852021
28 Sweden79,2512021
29 Belgium79,0042021
30 Austria79,0012021
31 Iran76,3132021
32 Philippines69,5042021
33 Nigeria64,4012021
34 Czech Republic63,6252021
35 Egypt62,6382021
36 Venezuela58,2372014
37 Denmark50,2992021
38 Puerto Rico51,2692021
39 Israel49,6572021
40 Romania49,2882021
41 South Africa49,1542021
42 Finland45,6762021
43 United Arab Emirates43,0302021
44 Algeria42,3832021
45 Pakistan41,4792021
46 Colombia36,2182021
47 Hungary33,8892021
48 Portugal29,5012021
49 Chile27,4472021
50 Norway26,7432021

See also

References
  1. Kenton, Will. "Manufacturing". Investopedia. Archived from the original on November 17, 2020. Retrieved January 16, 2021.
  2. Stevenson, Angus, ed. (2010). "manufacture, n.". Oxford English Dictionary (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acres/9780199571123.001.0001. ISBN 978-0199571123.
  3. Srivatsan, T. S.; Manigandan, K.; Sudarshan, T. S. (2018). "Use of Conventional Manufacturing Techniques for Materials". In Srivatsan, T. S.; Sudarshan, T. S.; Manigandan, K. (eds.). Manufacturing Techniques for Materials: Engineering and Engineered. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. 436–437. ISBN 978-1138099265.
  4. Youssef, Helmi A.; El-Hofy, Hassan (2008). Machining Technology: Machine Tools and Operations. Boca Raton: CRC Press. p. 1. ISBN 978-1420043396.
  5. "Human Ancestors Hall: Homo sapiens". Smithsonian Institution. Archived from the original on May 1, 2009. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  6. "Ancient 'Tool Factory' Uncovered". BBC News. May 6, 1999. Archived from the original on March 18, 2007. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  7. Heinzelin, Jean de; Clark, JD; White, T; Hart, W; Renne, P; Woldegabriel, G; Beyene, Y; Vrba, E (April 1999). "Environment and Behavior of 2.5-Million-Year-Old Bouri Hominids". Science. 284 (5414): 625–629. Bibcode:1999Sci...284..625D. doi:10.1126/science.284.5414.625. PMID 10213682.
  8. Burke, Ariane. "Archaeology". Encyclopedia Americana. Archived from the original on May 21, 2008. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  9. Plummer, Thomas (2004). "Flaked Stones and Old Bones: Biological and Cultural Evolution at the Dawn of Technology". American Journal of Physical Anthropology. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology. Suppl 39 (47): 118–64. doi:10.1002/APA.20157. PMID 15605391.
  10. Haviland, William A. (2004). Cultural Anthropology: The Human Challenge. The Thomson Corporation. p. 77. ISBN 978-0-534-62487-3.
  11. Tóth, Zsuzsanna (2012). "The First Neolithic Sites in Central/South-East European Transect, Volume III: The Körös Culture in Eastern Hungary". In Anders, Alexandra; Siklósi, Zsuzsanna (eds.). Bone, Antler, and Tusk tools of the Early Neolithic Körös Culture. Oxford: BAR International Series 2334.
  12. Merson, John (1990). The Genius That Was China: East and West in the Making of the Modern World. Woodstock, NY: The Overlook Press. p. 69. ISBN 978-0-87951-397-9.
  13. Paine, Lincoln (2013). The Sea and Civilization: A Maritime History of the World. New York: Random House, LLC.
  14. Jane C., Waldbaum (1978). From Bronze to Iron: The Transition from the Bronze Age to the Iron Age in the Eastern Mediterranean. Paul Aström. pp. 56–58. ISBN 91-85058-79-3. OCLC 1146527679.
  15. Photos, E. (1989). "The Question of Meteoritic versus Smelted Nickel-Rich Iron: Archaeological Evidence and Experimental Results". World Archaeology. 20 (3): 403–421. doi:10.1080/00438243.1989.9980081. JSTOR 124562. S2CID 5908149.
  16. Moorey, Peter Roger Stuart (1999). Ancient Mesopotamian Materials and Industries: The Archaeological Evidence. Eisenbrauns. ISBN 978-1575060422.
  17. Potts, D. T. (2012). A Companion to the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East. p. 285.
  18. Trzciński, Jerzy; Zaremba, Małgorzata; Rzepka, Sławomir; Welc, Fabian; Szczepański, Tomasz (June 1, 2016). "Preliminary Report on Engineering Properties and Environmental Resistance of Ancient Mud Bricks from Tell El-Retaba Archaeological Site in the Nile Delta". Studia Quaternaria. 33 (1): 47–56. doi:10.1515/squa-2016-0005. ISSN 2300-0384. S2CID 132452242.
  19. "Timeline: 8th century". 8th century. ISBN 978-0191735516. Archived from the original on August 25, 2021. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  20. de Safita, Neathery (July 2002). "A Brief History Of Paper". St. Louis Community College. Archived from the original on August 22, 2018. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  21. Marchetti, Cesare (1978). "A Postmortem Technology Assessment of the Spinning Wheel: The Last 1000 Years, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 13; pp. 91–93" (PDF). Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Archived (PDF) from the original on May 2, 2016. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  22. Rosen, William (2012). The Most Powerful Idea in the World: A Story of Steam, Industry and Invention. University Of Chicago Press. p. 237. ISBN 978-0-226-72634-2.
  23. "Industrial History of European Countries". European Route of Industrial Heritage. Council of Europe. Archived from the original on June 23, 2021. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  24. Landes, David S. (1969). The Unbound Prometheus. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge. ISBN 978-0-521-09418-4.
  25. Gupta, Bishnupriya. "Cotton Textiles and the Great Divergence: Lancashire, India and Shifting Competitive Advantage, 1600–1850" (PDF). International Institute of Social History. Department of Economics, University of Warwick. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 10, 2016. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  26. Taylor, George Rogers (1951). The Transportation Revolution, 1815–1860. ISBN 978-0-87332-101-3.
  27. Roe, Joseph Wickham (1916). English and American Tool Builders. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. LCCN 16011753. Archived from the original on April 14, 2021. Retrieved July 15, 2021. Reprinted by McGraw-Hill, New York and London, 1926 (LCCN 27-24075); and by Lindsay Publications, Inc., Bradley, Illinois, (ISBN 978-0-917914-73-7)
  28. Hunter, Louis C. (1985). A History of Industrial Power in the United States, 1730–1930, Vol. 2: Steam Power. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia. p. 18.
  29. Nye, David E. (1990). Electrifying America: Social Meanings of a New Technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States and London, England: The MIT Press.
  30. Thomson, Ross (1989). The Path to Mechanized Shoe Production in the United States. University of North Carolina Press. ISBN 978-0-8078-1867-1.
  31. Hounshell, David A. (1984), From the American System to Mass Production, 1800–1932: The Development of Manufacturing Technology in the United States, Baltimore, Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press, ISBN 978-0-8018-2975-8, LCCN 83016269, OCLC 1104810110.
  32. Hunter, Louis C. (1985). A History of Industrial Power in the United States, 1730–1930, Vol. 2: Steam Power. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
  33. Jerome, Harry (1934). Mechanization in Industry, National Bureau of Economic Research. p. xxviii.
  34. Nye, David E. (1990). Electrifying America: Social Meanings of a New Technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: MIT Press. pp. 14, 15.
  35. Hounshell 1984
  36. Hounshell 1984, p. 288
  37. Ohno, Taiichi (1988). Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production. CRC Press. ISBN 978-0-915299-14-0.
  38. Shingō, Shigeo (1985). A Revolution in Manufacturing: The SMED System. ISBN 0-915299-03-8. OCLC 12255263. Archived from the original on January 14, 2022. Retrieved March 6, 2023.
  39. "Site of BMC/Leyland Australia Manufacturing Plant: Nomination as an Historic Engineering Marker" (PDF). The Institution of Engineers, Australia. September 30, 1999. Archived (PDF) from the original on September 4, 2021. Retrieved July 30, 2021.
  40. Ashburn, A. (July 1977). "Toyota's "famous Ohno system"". American Machinist: 120–123.
  41. Sugimori, Y.; Kusunoki, K.; Cho, F.; Uchikawa, S. (1977). "Toyota Production System and Kanban System: Materialization of Just-in-time and Respect-for-human System". International Journal of Production Research. 15 (6): 553–564. doi:10.1080/00207547708943149. ISSN 0020-7543.
  42. "The Founding of the Association for Manufacturing Excellence: Summarized at a Meeting of its Founders, February 2, 2001" (PDF). Target. Association for Manufacturing Excellence. 17 (3): 23–24. 2001. Archived (PDF) from the original on March 9, 2021. Retrieved July 15, 2021.
  43. Hayes, R. H., Wheelwright, S. C. and Clark, K. B. (1988), Dynamic Manufacturing, New York: The Free Press, quoted in Wassenhove, L. van and Corbett, C. J., "Trade-Offs? What Trade Offs? (A Short Essay on Manufacturing Strategy, p. 1, INSEAD, published 6 April 1991, accessed 27 September 2023
  44. R. Sarmiento, G. Whelan, M. Thürer and F. A. Bribiescas-Silva, "Fifty Years of the Strategic Trade-Offs Model: In Memory and Honor of Wickham Skinner", in IEEE Engineering Management Review, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 92-96, 1 Second Quarter, June 2019, doi: 10.1109/EMR.2019.2915978, accessed 22 August 2023
  45. Skinner, W., Focused Factory, Harvard Business Review, published 1 May 1974
  46. Wassenhove, L. van and Corbett, C. J., "Trade-Offs? What Trade Offs? (A Short Essay on Manufacturing Strategy, p. 2, INSEAD, published 6 April 1991, accessed 27 September 2023
  47. Haas, E. A., "Breakthrough Manaufacturing", Harvard Business Review, March/April 1987, pp. 75-81
  48. Skinner, W., "Missing the Links in Manufacturing Strategy" in Voss, C. A. (ed) (1992), Manufacturing Strategy - Process and Content, Chapman and Hall, pp. 12-25
  49. Hill, T., Manufacturing Strategy: Developments in Approach and Analytics, University of warwick, 1990, accessed 28 September 2023
  50. Hill, T. (1993), Manufacturing Strategy, second edition, Macmillan, chapter 2
  51. Young, Julie. "Unit Cost Definition". investopedia.com. Investopedia. Archived from the original on May 20, 2022. Retrieved May 20, 2022.
  52. Spence, Michael (1984). "Cost Reduction, Competition, and Industry Performance". Econometrica. Econometrica – Journal of the Economic Society, Vol. 52, No. 1 (Jan. 1984). 52 (1): 101–121. doi:10.2307/1911463. JSTOR 1911463. Archived from the original on March 5, 2022. Retrieved May 20, 2022.
  53. "Manufacturing Program". Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. February 11, 2019. Archived from the original on April 3, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019.
  54. "National Occupational Research Agenda for Manufacturing". Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. February 4, 2019. Archived from the original on June 18, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019.
  55. Manufacturing and Investment Around the World: An International Survey of Factors Affecting Growth and Performance (2nd ed.). Manchester: Industrial Systems Research. 2002. ISBN 0-906321-25-5. OCLC 49552466.
  56. Research, Industrial Systems (2002). Manufacturing and Investment Around the World: An International Survey of Factors Affecting Growth and Performance. ISBN 978-0-906321-25-6. Archived from the original on April 1, 2021. Retrieved November 19, 2015.
  57. David Bailey; Soyoung Kim (June 26, 2009). "GE's Immelt says U.S. economy needs industrial renewal". Reuters. Archived from the original on December 12, 2020. Retrieved March 6, 2023.
  58. "Why Does Manufacturing Matter? Which Manufacturing Matters?". February 2012. Archived from the original on October 8, 2012.
  59. Martin Crutsinger (2007). "Factory Jobs: 3 Million Lost Since 2000". USA Today. Associated Press. Archived from the original on December 4, 2022. Retrieved March 6, 2023.
  60. "UNIDO Statistics Data Portal". Archived from the original on October 5, 2021. Retrieved October 5, 2021.
  61. "Leading Manufacturing Nations". July 15, 2021. Archived from the original on March 4, 2022. Retrieved March 14, 2022.
  62. "UNIDO's Competitive Industrial Performance Index 2020: Country Profiles". unido.org. Archived from the original on April 6, 2022. Retrieved June 21, 2022.
  63. "Competitive Industrial Performance Index 2020: Country Profiles ( Report)". stat.unido.org. Archived from the original on January 10, 2022. Retrieved June 21, 2022.
  64. "Manufacturing, Value Added (Current US$)". World Bank. Archived from the original on January 7, 2020. Retrieved July 14, 2021.

Sources
  • Kalpakjian, Serope; Steven Schmid (2005). Manufacturing, Engineering & Technology. Prentice Hall. pp. 22–36, 951–988. ISBN 978-0-13-148965-3.
Look up manufacturing in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Manufacturing.
Wikiquote has quotations related to Manufacturing.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.