Kim A. Wilcox

Wilcox's primary work has been in the acoustics of speech production.[14] Much of his early work focused on the effects of neurological impairments to the speech musculature. His later work increasingly focused on developmental speech and language issues including remediation of speech disorders in children.[15]

Wilcox has been a vocal critic of commercial college rankings such as those published by U.S. News & World Report. In a 2015 interview with the Washington Post, Wilcox argued that the U.S. News formula for ranking colleges was inconsistent with the mission of public higher education.[16] The reporter describes Wilcox as believing that “the U.S. News formula is mostly about wealth and perceptions. It rewards schools that raise and spend a lot of money . . . and provides little incentive for schools to become more efficient at serving students with disadvantages.” In 2016, Wilcox published an opinion piece in the San Diego Union Tribune arguing that prospective college students should focus on rankings based on graduation and retention rates as opposed to those based on reputation and acceptance rates.[17]

On November 29, 2016, the UC Riverside Faculty Senate held a town hall meeting to address widespread concerns about Chancellor Wilcox's leadership. Concerns raised at the meeting included "inadequate planning for campus growth, poorly maintained facilities..., low morale," and "a feeling of disconnect between Chancellor Kim Wilcox’s office and the university’s 852 faculty members."[18] In a December 5, 2016 letter to the Faculty Senate, Wilcox admitted the problems with his leadership, acknowledging that "“Clearly, we have significant work ahead of us to rectify this situation.”[19]

On December 16, 2016, Wilcox's hand-picked choice for UC Riverside Executive Vice-Chancellor and Provost, Paul D'Anieri, resigned rather than face a vote of no confidence by the Faculty Senate. The faculty strongly objected to the "top-down" management style fostered by Wilcox and D'Anieri, to their incompetent handling of new faculty hires, and to the "climate of fear and mistrust" they had generated on campus. Despite claiming that "D’Anieri should not be blamed for decisions ... that were made collectively by senior administrators", Wilcox accepted his subordinate's resignation.[20]

A "cluster hiring" initiative spearheaded by Wilcox and D'Anieri had drawn sharp criticism from the Faculty Senate for its extremely poor planning and lack of transparency.[21] A survey of the faculty in early 2016 found widespread agreement that the initiative had been poorly conceived and mismanaged. One professor commented that “The faculty, as far as I can tell, overwhelmingly loathes and resents the cluster hiring plan.... It threatens to inflict damage to academic programs on this campus that may take literally decades to undo – if it can be undone.”[22] At the November 29 town hall meeting, faculty complained that new hires had been brought in without sufficient investment in infrastructure, leading to a serious shortage of office and laboratory space and a strain on existing facilities.[23] As a result of these criticisms, Wilcox was forced to declare an immediate moratorium on any major new initiatives at UC Riverside.[24]