Social determinants of health

The social determinants of health (SDOH) are the economic and social conditions that influence individual and group differences in health status.[1] They are the health promoting factors found in one's living and working conditions (such as the distribution of income, wealth, influence, and power), rather than individual risk factors (such as behavioral risk factors or genetics) that influence the risk for a disease, or vulnerability to disease or injury. The distributions of social determinants are often shaped by public policies that reflect prevailing political ideologies of the area.[2]

The World Health Organization says that "the social determinants can be more important than health care or lifestyle choices in influencing health."[3] and "This unequal distribution of health-damaging experiences is not in any sense a 'natural' phenomenon but is the result of a toxic combination of poor social policies, unfair economic arrangements [where the already well-off and healthy become even richer and the poor who are already more likely to be ill become even poorer], and bad politics."[4] Issues of particular focus are social determinants of mental health, social determinants of health in poverty and social determinants of obesity.

Historical development
Social Determinants of Health visualization

Starting in the early 2000s, the World Health Organization facilitated the academic and political work on social determinants in a way that provided a deep understanding of health disparities in a global perspective. In 2003, the World Health Organization (WHO) Europe suggested that the social determinants of health included: the social gradient, stress, early life, social exclusion, work, unemployment, social support, addiction, food, and transportation.[5]

In 2008, the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health published a report entitled "Closing the Gap in a Generation", which aimed to understand, from a social justice perspective, how health inequity could be remedied, and what actions could combat factors that exacerbated injustices.[6] The work of the commission was based on development goals, and thus, connected SDH (social determinants of health) discourse to economic growth and bridging gaps in the healthcare system.[6] This report identified two broad areas of social determinants of health that needed to be addressed.[6] The first area was daily living conditions, which included healthy physical environments, fair employment, and decent work, social protection across the lifespan, and access to health care. The second major area was distribution of power, money, and resources, including equity in health programs, public financing of action on the social determinants, economic inequalities, resource depletion, healthy working conditions, gender equity, political empowerment, and a balance of power and prosperity of nations.[6][7][8]

The 2010 Affordable Care Act (ACA) established by the Obama administration in the United States, embodied the ideas put in place by the WHO by bridging the gap between community-based health and healthcare as a medical treatment, meaning that a larger consideration of social determinants of health was emerging in the policy.[9] The ACA established community change through initiatives like providing Community Transformation Grants to community organizations, which opened up further debates and talks about increased integration of policies to create change on a larger scale.[10]

The 2011 World Conference on Social Determinants of Health, in which 125 delegations participated, created the Rio Political Declaration on Social Determinants of Health.[11] With a series of affirmations and announcements, the Declaration aimed to communicate that the social conditions in which an individual exists were key to understanding health disparities that individual may face, and it called for new policies across the world to fight health disparities, along with global collaborations.[12][13]

Commonly accepted social determinants

The United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defines social determinants of health as "life-enhancing resources, such as food supply, housing, economic and social relationships, transportation, education, and health care, whose distribution across populations effectively determines length and quality of life."[14] These include access to care and resources such as food, insurance coverage, income, housing, and transportation.[14] Differences in rates of occupational injuries and illnesses are closely linked with demographic, social, cultural, economic, and/or political factors. Although many advances have been made to rectify gaps in occupational health within the past half century, still many persist due to the complex overlapping of occupational health and social factors.[15]

According to a report by the Center for Migration Studies of New York, the different social determinants of health are strongly correlated. People living in an area with one identified determinant also tend to be affected by other determinants.[16] Social determinants of health influence health-promoting behaviors, and health equity among the population is not possible without equitable distribution of social determinants among groups.[14]

A commonly used model that illustrate the relationship between biological, individual, community, and societal determinants is Whitehead and Dahlgren's model originally presented in 1991 and has been adapted by the CDC.[17] Additionally, within the United States, the Healthy People 2030 is an objective-driven framework which can guide public health practitioners and healthcare providers on how to address social determinants of health at the community level.[18]

In Canada, these social determinants of health have gained wide usage: Income and income distribution; Education; Unemployment and job security; Employment and working conditions; Early childhood development; Food insecurity;[19] Housing; Social exclusion/inclusion; Social safety network; Health services; Aboriginal status; Gender; Race; Disability.[20]

The list of social determinants of health can be much longer. A recently published article identified several other social determinants .[21] Unfortunately, there is no agreed taxonomy or criteria as to what should be considered a social determinant of health. In the literature, a subjective assessment—whether social factors impacting health are avoidable through structural changes in policy and practice—seems to be the dominant way of identifying a social determinant of health.[21] The increase of artificial intelligence (AI) being used in clinical care raises numerous opportunities for addressing health equity issues, yet clear models and procedures for data characteristics and design have not been embraced consistently across health systems and providers.[22]

Gender
This section is an excerpt from Gender disparities in health.[edit]

The World Health Organization (WHO) has defined health as "a state of complete physical, mental, and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity."[23] Identified by the 2012 World Development Report as one of two key human capital endowments, health can influence an individual's ability to reach his or her full potential in society.[24] Yet while gender equality has made the most progress in areas such as education and labor force participation, health inequality between men and women continues to harm many societies to this day.

While both males and females face health disparities, women have historically experienced a disproportionate amount of health inequity. This stems from the fact that many cultural ideologies and practices have created a structured patriarchal society where women are vulnerable to abuse and mistreatment.[25] Additionally, women are typically restricted from receiving certain opportunities such as education and paid labor that can help improve their accessibility to better health care resources. Females are also frequently underrepresented or excluded from mixed-sex clinical trials and therefore subjected to physician bias in diagnosis and treatment. [25]

Race
This section is an excerpt from Race and health.[edit]

Race and health refers to how being identified with a specific race influences health. Race is a complex concept that has changed across chronological eras and depends on both self-identification and social recognition.[26] In the study of race and health, scientists organize people in racial categories depending on different factors such as: phenotype, ancestry, social identity, genetic makeup and lived experience. "Race" and ethnicity often remain undifferentiated in health research.[27][28]

Differences in health status, health outcomes, life expectancy, and many other indicators of health in different racial and ethnic groups are well documented.[29] Epidemiological data indicate that racial groups are unequally affected by diseases, in terms or morbidity and mortality.[30] Some individuals in certain racial groups receive less care, have less access to resources, and live shorter lives in general.[31] Overall, racial health disparities appear to be rooted in social disadvantages associated with race such as implicit stereotyping and average differences in socioeconomic status.[32][33][34]

Health disparities are defined as "preventable differences in the burden of disease, injury, violence, or opportunities to achieve optimal health that are experienced by socially disadvantaged populations".[35] According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, they are intrinsically related to the "historical and current unequal distribution of social, political, economic and environmental resources".[35][36]

The relationship between race and health has been studied from multidisciplinary perspectives, with increasing focus on how racism influences health disparities, and how environmental and physiological factors respond to one another and to genetics.[32][33]

Economics

"Economic stability is a social determinant that significantly impacts employees because it is an aspect of wellness that intersects with so many others.[37]" Economic stability within households is essential for the health and well-being of families, neighborhoods and for local and national economies.[38] "Economic security is having stable, sufficient income to meet basic needs while economic insecurity is living in a household with incomes below 200 percent of the federal poverty level.[38]" According to Child Welfare League of America (CWLA), Economic stability is described as the ability to obtain the resources that is necessary to one's life and well-being.[3]

As one's job or career is a primary conduit for both financial and social capital, work is an important, yet under represented, factor in health inequities research and prevention efforts.[39] There are many ways that a job can affect one's health, such as the job's physical demands, exposure to hazards, mechanisms of employment, compensation and benefits, and availability of health and safety programs. In addition, those who are in steady jobs are less likely to face poverty and its implications and more likely to have access to health care.[39] [40][41][42][43]

Maintenance of good health through the utilization of proper healthcare resources can be quite costly and therefore unaffordable to certain populations. According to the Healthy People 2030, people with steady employment are less likely to live in poverty and more likely to be healthy, however, many people struggle with finding and keeping a job.[44] "In the United States, 1 in 10 people live poverty,[45] and many people cannot afford things like healthy foods, health care, and housing." Social needs, environmental factors and barriers to accessing health care that are unaddressed could lead to worse health outcomes for people with lower incomes.[46][47] Additionally, residents of impoverished communities are at increased risk for mental illness, chronic disease, higher mortality, and lower life expectancy.[48]

Ongoing debates

Steven H. Woolf of the Virginia Commonwealth University Center on Human Needs states, "The degree to which social conditions affect health is illustrated by the association between education and mortality rates."[49] Reports in 2005 revealed the mortality rate was 206.3 per 100,000 for adults aged 25 to 64 years with little education beyond high school, but was twice as great (477.6 per 100,000) for those with only a high school education and three times as great (650.4 per 100,000) for those less educated. Based on the data collected, the social conditions such as education, income, and race were dependent on one another, but these social conditions also apply to independent health influences.[49]

Marmot and Bell of the University College London found that in wealthy countries, income and mortality are correlated as a marker of relative position within society, and this relative position is related to social conditions that are important for health including good early childhood development, access to high quality education, rewarding work with some degree of autonomy, decent housing, and a clean and safe living environment. The social condition of autonomy, control, and empowerment turns are important influences on health and disease, and individuals who lack social participation and control over their lives are at a greater risk for heart disease and mental illness.[50]

Early childhood development can be promoted or disrupted as a result of the social and environmental factors effecting the mother, while the child is still in the womb. Janet Currie's research finds that women in New York City receiving assistance from the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), in comparison to their previous or future childbirth, are 5.6% less likely to give birth to a child who is underweight, an indication that a child will have better short term, and long term physical, and cognitive development.[51]

Several other social determinants are related to health outcomes and public policy, and are easily understood by the public to impact health.[21] They tend to cluster together – for example, those living in poverty experience a number of negative health determinants.[20]

International health inequalities
Health gap in England and Wales, 2011 Census

Even in the wealthiest countries, there are health inequalities between the rich and the poor.[52] Researchers Labonte and Schrecker from the Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine at the University of Ottawa emphasize that globalization is key to understanding the social determinants of health, and as Bushra (2011) posits, the impacts of globalization are unequal.[53] Globalization has caused an uneven distribution of wealth and power both within and across national borders, and where and in what situation a person is born has an enormous impact on their health outcomes. The Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development found significant differences among developed nations in health status indicators such as life expectancy, infant mortality, incidence of disease, and death from injuries.[54] Migrants and their family members also experience significant negatives health impacts.[55]

These inequalities may exist in the context of the health care system, or in broader social approaches. According to the WHO's Commission on Social Determinants of Health, access to health care is essential for equitable health, and it argued that health care should be a common good rather than a market commodity.[4] However, there is substantial variation in health care systems and coverage from country to country. The commission also calls for government action on such things as access to clean water and safe, equitable working conditions, and it notes that dangerous working conditions exist even in some wealthy countries.[4][56] In the Rio Political Declaration on Social Determinants of Health, several key areas of action were identified to address inequalities, including promotion of participatory policy-making processes, strengthening global governance and collaboration, and encouraging developed countries to reach a target of 0.7% of gross national product (GNP) for official development assistance.[57]

Theoretical approaches

The UK Black and The Health Divide reports considered two primary mechanisms for understanding how social determinants influence health: cultural/behavioral and materialist/structuralist[58] The cultural/behavioral explanation is that individuals' behavioral choices (e.g., tobacco and alcohol use, diet, physical activity, etc.) were responsible for their development and deaths from a variety of diseases. However, both the Black and Health Divide reports found that behavioral choices are determined by one's material conditions of life, and these behavioral risk factors account for a relatively small proportion of variation in the incidence and death from various diseases.

The materialist/structuralist explanation emphasizes the people's material living conditions. These conditions include availability of resources to access the amenities of life, working conditions, and quality of available food and housing among others. Within this view, three frameworks have been developed to explain how social determinants influence health.[59] These frameworks are: (a) materialist; (b) neo-materialist; and (c) psychosocial comparison. The materialist view explains how living conditions – and the social determinants of health that constitute these living conditions – shape health. The neo-materialist explanation extends the materialist analysis by asking how these living conditions occur. The psychosocial comparison explanation considers whether people compare themselves to others and how these comparisons affect health and wellbeing.

A nation's wealth is a strong indicator of the health of its population. Within nations, however, individual socio-economic position is a powerful predictor of health.[60] Material conditions of life determine health by influencing the quality of individual development, family life and interaction, and community environments. Material conditions of life lead to differing likelihood of physical (infections, malnutrition, chronic disease, and injuries), developmental (delayed or impaired cognitive, personality, and social development), educational (learning disabilities, poor learning, early school leaving), and social (socialization, preparation for work, and family life) problems.[61] Material conditions of life also lead to differences in psychosocial stress.[62] When the fight-or-flight reaction is chronically elicited in response to constant threats to income, housing, and food availability, the immune system is weakened, insulin resistance is increased, and lipid and clotting disorders appear more frequently. The effects of chronic fight-or-flight is described in the allostatic load model[63]

The materialist approach offers insight into the sources of health inequalities among individuals and nations. Adoption of health-threatening behaviors is also influenced by material deprivation and stress.[64] Environments influence whether individuals take up tobacco, use alcohol, consume poor diets, and have low levels of physical activity. Tobacco use, excessive alcohol consumption, and carbohydrate-dense diets are also used to cope with difficult circumstances.[65][64] The materialist approach seeks to understand how these social determinants occur.

The neo-materialist approach is concerned with how nations, regions, and cities differ on how economic and other resources are distributed among the population.[66] This distribution of resources can vary widely from country to country. The neo-materialist view focuses on both the social determinants of health and the societal factors that determine the distribution of these social determinants, and especially emphasizes how resources are distributed among members of a society.

The social comparison approach holds that the social determinants of health play their role through citizens' interpretations of their standings in the social hierarchy.[67] There are two mechanisms by which this occurs. At the individual level, the perception and experience of one's status in unequal societies lead to stress and poor health. Feelings of shame, worthlessness, and envy can lead to harmful effects upon neuro-endocrine, autonomic and metabolic, and immune systems.[62] Comparisons to those of a higher social class can also lead to attempts to alleviate such feelings by overspending, taking on additional employment that threaten health, and adopting health-threatening coping behaviors such as overeating and using alcohol and tobacco.[67] At the communal level, widening and strengthening of hierarchy weakens social cohesion, which is a determinant of health.[68] The social comparison approach directs attention to the psychosocial effects of public policies that weaken the social determinants of health. However, these effects may be secondary to how societies distribute material resources and provide security to its citizens, which are described in the materialist and neo-materialist approaches.

Life-course perspective

Life-course approaches emphasize the accumulated effects of experience across the life span in understanding the maintenance of health and the onset of disease. The economic and social conditions – the social determinants of health – under which individuals live their lives have a cumulative effect upon the probability of developing any number of diseases, including heart disease and stroke.[69] Studies into the childhood and adulthood antecedents of adult-onset diabetes show that adverse economic and social conditions across the life span predispose individuals to this disorder.[70][71]

Hertzman outlines three health effects that have relevance for a life-course perspective.[72] Latent effects are biological or developmental early life experiences that influence health later in life. Low birth weight, for instance, is a reliable predictor of incidence of cardiovascular disease and adult-onset diabetes in later life. Nutritional deprivation during childhood has lasting health effects as well.

Pathway effects are experiences that set individuals onto trajectories that influence health, well-being, and competence over the life course. As one example, children who enter school with delayed vocabulary are set upon a path that leads to lower educational expectations, poor employment prospects, and greater likelihood of illness and disease across the lifespan. Deprivation associated with poor-quality neighborhoods, schools, and housing sets children off on paths that are not conducive to health and well-being.[73]

Cumulative effects are the accumulation of advantage or disadvantage over time that manifests itself in poor health, in particular between women and men.[74] These involve the combination of latent and pathways effects. Adopting a life-course perspective directs attention to how social determinants of health operate at every level of development – in utero, infancy, early childhood, childhood, adolescence, and adulthood – to both immediately influence health and influence it in the future.[75][76]

Chronic stress and health

Stress is hypothesized to be a major influence in the social determinants of health. There is a relationship between experience of chronic stress and negative health outcomes.[77] This relationship is explained through both direct and indirect effects of chronic stress on health outcomes.

The direct relationship between stress and health outcomes is the effect of stress on human physiology. The long term stress hormone, cortisol, is believed to be the key driver in this relationship.[78] Chronic stress has been found to be significantly associated with chronic low-grade inflammation, slower wound healing, increased susceptibility to infections, and poorer responses to vaccines.[77] Meta-analysis of healing studies has found that there is a robust relationship between elevated stress levels and slower healing for many different acute and chronic conditions[79] However, it is also important to note that certain factors, such as coping styles and social support, can mitigate the relationship between chronic stress and health outcomes.[80][81]

Stress can also be seen to have an indirect effect on health status. One way this happens is due to the strain on the psychological resources of the stressed individual. Chronic stress is common in those of a low socio-economic status, who are having to balance worries about financial security, how they will feed their families, housing status, and many other concerns.[82] Therefore, individuals with these kinds of worries may lack the emotional resources to adopt positive health behaviors. Chronically stressed individuals may therefore be less likely to prioritize their health.

In addition to this, the way that an individual responds to stress can influence their health status. Often, individuals responding to chronic stress will develop potentially positive or negative coping behaviors. People who cope with stress through positive behaviors such as exercise or social connections may not be as affected by the relationship between stress and health, whereas those with a coping style more prone to over-consumption (i.e. emotional eating, drinking, smoking or drug use) are more likely to see negative health effects of stress.[80] Vape shops are also found more in low socioeconomic status areas. The owners target these areas in particular to gain profit. Since people with low-income status are not highly educated, they are more prone to make poor health behavior choices. Socioeconomic status also has a huge impact in lives of people of color. According to Kids Count Data Center, Children in Poverty 2014, in the United States 39% of African American children and adolescents, and 33% of Latino children and adolescents are living in poverty (Kids Count Data Center, Children in Poverty 2014).[83] The stress these racial groups with low socioeconomic status face, is higher than the same race group from a high-income community.[84] According to the research done on socioeconomic disparities in vape shop density and proximity to public schools, the researchers found that vape shops were located a lot more in the areas with schools where African-Americans/Latinos/Hispanic students were in higher population than the areas with schools where White population was more.[85]

The detrimental effects of stress on health outcomes are hypothesized to partly explain why countries that have high levels of income inequality have poorer health outcomes compared to more equal countries.[86] Wilkinson and Picket hypothesized in their book The Spirit Level that the stressors associated with low social status are amplified in societies where others are clearly far better off.[86]

A landmark study conducted by the World Health Organization and the International Labour Organization found that exposure to long working hours, operating through psychosocial stress, is the occupational risk factor with the largest attributable burden of disease, i.e. an estimated 745,000 fatalities from ischemic heart disease and stroke events in 2016.[87]

Improving health conditions worldwide

Reducing the health gap requires that governments build systems that allow a healthy standard of living for every resident.

Interventions

Three common interventions for improving social determinant outcomes as identified by the WHO are education, social security and urban development. However, evaluation of interventions has been difficult due to the nature of the interventions, their impact and the fact that the interventions strongly affect children's health outcomes.[88]

  1. Education: Many scientific studies have been conducted and strongly suggests that increased quantity and quality of education leads to benefits to both the individual and society (e.g. improved labor productivity).[89] Health and economic outcome improvements can be seen in health measures such as blood pressure,[90][91] crime,[92] and market participation trends.[93] Examples of interventions include decreasing size of classes and providing additional resources to low-income school districts. However, there is currently insufficient evidence to support education as a social determinants intervention with a cost-benefit analysis.[88]
  2. Social Protection: Interventions such as “health-related cash transfers”, maternal education, and nutrition-based social protections have been shown to have a positive impact on health outcomes.[94][95] However, the full economic costs and impacts generated of social security interventions are difficult to evaluate, especially as many social protections primarily affect children of recipients.[88] The landmark Cochrane Collaboration Review of the health impact of unconditional cash transfers in low- and middle-income countries found a large body of evidence that these cash transfers clinically meaningfully reduce in the likelihood of being sick (by an estimated 27%), may also improve food security and dietary diversity, and may also reduce extreme poverty and improve school attendance, as well as increase healthcare spending.[96][97]
  3. Urban Development: Urban development interventions include a wide variety of potential targets such as housing, transportation, and infrastructure improvements. The health benefits are considerable (especially for children), because housing improvements such as smoke alarm installation, concrete flooring, removal of lead paint, etc. can have a direct impact on health.[98] In addition, there is a fair amount of evidence to prove that external urban development interventions such as transportation improvements or improved walkability of neighborhoods (which is highly effective in developed countries) can have health benefits.[88] Affordable housing options (including public housing) can make large contributions to both social determinants of health, as well as the local economy,[99] and access to public natural areas -including green and blue spaces- is also associated with improved health benefits.[100][101]

The Commission on Social Determinants of Health made recommendations in 2005 for action to promote health equity based on three principles: "improve the circumstances in which people are born, grow, live, work, and age; tackle the inequitable distribution of power, money, and resources, the structural drivers of conditions of daily life, globally, nationally, and locally; and measure the problem, evaluate action, and expand the knowledge base."[102] These recommendations would involve providing resources such as quality education, decent housing, access to affordable health care, access to healthy food, and safe places to exercise for everyone despite gaps in affluence. Expansion of knowledge of the social determinants of health, including among healthcare workers, can improve the quality and standard of care for people who are marginalized, poor or living in developing nations by preventing early death and disability while working to improve quality of life.[103]

Challenges of measuring value of interventions

Many economic studies have been conducted to measure the effectiveness and value of social determinant interventions but are unable to accurately reflect effects on public health due to the multi-faceted nature of the topic. While neither cost-effectiveness nor cost-utility analysis is able to be used on social determinant interventions, cost-benefit analysis is able to better capture the effects of an intervention on multiple sectors of the economy. For example, tobacco interventions have shown to decrease tobacco use, but also prolong lifespans, increasing lifetime healthcare costs and is therefore marked as a failed intervention by cost-effectiveness, but not cost-benefit. Another issue with research in this area is that most of the current scientific papers focus on rich, developed countries, and there is a lack of research in developing countries.[88]

Policy changes that affect children also present the challenge that it takes a significant amount of time to gather this type of data. In addition, policies to reduce child poverty are particularly important, as elevated stress hormones in children interfere with the development of brain circuitry and connections, causing long term chemical damage.[104] In most wealthy countries, the relative child poverty rate is 10 percent or less; in the United States, it is 21.9 percent.[105] The lowest poverty rates are more common in smaller well-developed and high-spending welfare states like Sweden and Finland, with about 5 or 6 percent.[105] Middle-level rates are found in major European countries where unemployment compensation is more generous and social policies provide more generous support to single mothers and working women (through paid family leave, for example), and where social assistance minimums are high. For instance, the Netherlands, Austria, Belgium and Germany have poverty rates that are in the 7 to 8 percent range.[106]

Within clinical settings

Connecting patients with the necessary social services during their visits to hospitals or medical clinics is an important factor in preventing patients from experiencing decreased health outcomes as a result of social or environmental factors.[107]

A clinical study done by researchers at the University of California San Francisco, indicated that connecting patients with the resources to utilize and contact social services during clinical visits, significantly decreased families social needs and significantly improved children's overall health.[108]

In addition, within the clinical setting, it was noted that in order to better health outcomes for the patients in any clinical setting, a collection of SHD data should be documented. This helps maintain the connection between healthcare systems and organizations that address these needs that were documented.[109]

Public policy

The Rio Political Declaration on Social Determinants of Health embraces a transparent, participatory model of policy development that, among other things, addresses the social determinants of health leading to persistent health inequalities for indigenous peoples.[57] In 2017, citing the need for accountability for the pledges made by countries in the Rio Political Declaration on Social Determinants of Health, the World Health Organization and United Nations Children's Fund called for the monitoring of intersectoral interventions on the social determinants of health that improve health equity.[110]

The United States Department of Health and Human Services includes social determinants in its model of population health, and one of its missions is to strengthen policies which are backed by the best available evidence and knowledge in the field [111] Social determinants of health do not exist in a vacuum. Their quality and availability to the population are usually a result of public policy decisions made by governing authorities. For example, early life is shaped by availability of sufficient material resources that assure adequate educational opportunities, food, and housing among others. Much of this has to do with the employment security and the quality of working conditions and wages. The availability of quality, regulated childcare is an especially important policy option in support of early life.[112] These are not issues that usually come under individual control but rather they are socially constructed conditions which require institutional responses.[113] A policy-oriented approach places such findings within a broader policy context. In this context, Health in All Policies has seen as a response to incorporate health and health equity into all public policies as means to foster synergy between sectors and ultimately promote health.

Yet it is not uncommon to see governmental and other authorities individualize these issues. Governments may view early life as being primarily about parental behaviors towards their children. They then focus upon promoting better parenting, assist in having parents read to their children, or urge schools to foster exercise among children rather than raising the amount of financial or housing resources available to families. Indeed, for every social determinant of health, an individualized manifestation of each is available. There is little evidence to suggest the efficacy of such approaches in improving the health status of those most vulnerable to illness in the absence of efforts to modify their adverse living conditions.[114]

A team of the Cochrane Collaboration conducted the first comprehensive systematic review of the health impact of unconditional cash transfers, as an increasingly common up-stream, structural social determinant of health. The review of 21 studies, including 16 randomized controlled trials, found that unconditional cash transfers may not improve health services use. However, they lead to a large, clinically meaningful reduction in the likelihood of being sick by an estimated 27%. Unconditional cash transfers may also improve food security and dietary diversity. Children in recipient families are more likely to attend school, and the cash transfers may increase money spent on health care.[96]

One of the recommendations by the Commission on the Social Determinants of Health is expanding knowledge – particularly to health care workers.[103]

Although not addressed by the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health, sexual orientation and gender identity are increasingly recognized as social determinants of health.[115]

With all the different health inequities and differences in quality of care addressed in social determinants of health, the American Hospital Association created the Value Initiative project which helps make healthcare more affordable to people of all types. It does this four different ways:

  1. It frames issues regarding the healthcare system and its pricing and affordability.[116]
  2. It provides knowledge, resources, and tools for hospitals to supply affordable healthcare and increase value[116]
  3. The initiative collects data of hospital experiences to develop new federal policy solutions[116]
  4. Builds a platform for the American Hospital Association to discuss with policymakers to find solutions to the lack of affordable care.[116]

This initiative educates the public and makes sure there is transparency in pricing of hospital bills, making sure patients are not billed more than they should be. It also addresses the cost drivers in the healthcare system, and urges for legislators to take action to make healthcare affordable and to prioritize health over profit.[117] This organization asks congress to control the rising costs of pharmaceuticals by encouraging competition between manufacturers, and improving transparency in drug pricing.[117] In this value initiative, they have started the Affordability Advocacy Agenda (AAA) which improves the ongoing policy and advocacy activities. With the Covid-19 pandemic health care spending increased and there was a rise in hospitalizations and therefore a rise in demand for health care providers. The price for care has increased and there aren't enough workers to meet the demand for care.[118] The AAA and congress are working together to provide relief from the pandemic in order to make healthcare more affordable to all.

As of January 1, 2022 there are regulations placed for healthcare providers about no surprise billing. This is the "No Surprises Act" of division BB of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 and this rule was made by the Biden-Harris administration.[119] Patients should not be billed more than they expected to pay, it is often noticed with emergency services and this rule will stop patients from getting worried about any bills out of their budget, and they will be able to get the proper care they need for their health with peace of mind. The act was passed by congress at the end of 2020 and offers protection against insured Americans getting surprise bills from out-of-network providers [120] They struggled to find an amount that an insurer should pay to the out-of-network provider, but eventually found an amount and the law is now in effect as of January 2022.[120] When it comes to out-of-network providers, patients often rely on these services in an emergency and then get stuck with the bill afterwards.[121] Air Ambulance bills are a big problem for consumers, not just because they are out of network and cost a lot, but also for their lack of billing transparency.[121] Since the Airline Deregulation Act, which allows air ambulance to make their own prices, federal solutions to this increasing cost of emergency care is needed.[122] A possible solution is to allow air ambulance services to be administered and financed in a way that combines competitive bidding and public utility regulation.[121]

See also

Notes and references
  1. Braveman, P. and Gottlieb, L., 2014. The social determinants of health: it's time to consider the causes of the causes. Public health reports, 129(1_suppl2), pp.19-31.
  2. Mikkonen, Juha; Raphael, Dennis (2010). Social Determinants of Health: The Canadian Facts (PDF). York University School of Health Policy and Management. ISBN 978-0-9683484-1-3. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2015-03-19. Retrieved 2015-05-03.
  3. Child Welfare League of America (April 25, 2023). "Economic Stability and SDOH". Retrieved April 25, 2023.
  4. Commission on Social Determinants of Health (2008). Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health (PDF). World Health Organization. ISBN 978-92-4-156370-3. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2013-02-04. Retrieved 2013-03-27. Pg 2
  5. Wilkinson, Richard; Marmot, Michael, eds. (2003). The Social Determinants of Health: The Solid Facts (PDF) (2nd ed.). World Health Organization Europe. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/326568
  6. Commission on Social Determinants of Health (2008). Closing the Gap in a Generation: Health Equity Through Action on the Social Determinants of Health (PDF). World Health Organization. ISBN 978-92-4-156370-3. Retrieved 2013-03-27. Pg 2
  7. Kickbusch, Ilona; Allen, Luke; Franz, Christian (2016). "The commercial determinants of health". The Lancet Global Health. 4 (12): e895–e896. doi:10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30217-0. PMID 27855860.
  8. Ahonen, Emily Quinn; Fujishiro, Kaori; Cunningham, Thomas; Flynn, Michael (2018). "Work as an Inclusive Part of Population Health Inequities Research and Prevention". American Journal of Public Health. 108 (3): 306–311. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2017.304214. ISSN 0090-0036. PMC 5803801. PMID 29345994.
  9. Hinton, Elizabeth., and Samantha Artiga. "Beyond Health Care: The Role of Social Determinants in Promoting Health and Health Equity." Health 20.10 (2015): 1-10.
  10. Leong, Donna; Roberts, Elizabeth (2013-07-01). "Social determinants of health and the Affordable Care Act". Rhode Island Medical Journal (2013). 96 (7): 20–22. ISSN 2327-2228. PMID 23819136.
  11. Humber, Lee (2019), "The Social Determinants of Health", Vital Signs: The Deadly Costs of Health Inequality, Pluto Press, pp. 39–52, doi:10.2307/j.ctvn5txst.7, ISBN 978-1-78680-424-2
  12. The World Health Organization, World Conference on Social Determinants of Health, Rio Political Declaration on Social Determinants of Health (21 October 2011), available from https://www.who.int/sdhconference/declaration/Rio_political_declaration.pdf?ua=1.
  13. Gharebaghi, Reza; Heidary, Fatemeh; Heidary Roghayeh; Vaez Mahdavi Mohammadreza (2010). "Social determinants in ocular diseases". Clinical Optometry. 2: 119–120. doi:10.2147/OPTO.S15290. ISSN 1179-2752.
  14. Brennan Ramirez, Laura K.; Baker, Elizabeth A.; Metzler, Marilyn (2008). Promoting Health Equity: A Resource to Help Communities Address Social Determinants of Health (PDF). United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. p. 6. Retrieved May 3, 2015.
  15. Flynn, Michael A.; Check, Pietra; Steege, Andrea L.; Sivén, Jacqueline M.; Syron, Laura N. (2021-12-29). "Health Equity and a Paradigm Shift in Occupational Safety and Health". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19 (1): 349. doi:10.3390/ijerph19010349. ISSN 1660-4601. PMC 8744812. PMID 35010608.
  16. Virgin, Vicky; Warren, Robert (2021). "Mapping Key Determinants of Immigrants' Health in Brooklyn and Queens" (PDF). cmsny.org. Center for Migration Studies of New York (CMS). Retrieved September 13, 2022.
  17. Dahlgren, Göran; Whitehead, Margaret; Europe, World Health Organization Regional Office for (2006). "Levelling up (part 2) : a discussion paper on European strategies for tackling social inequities in health". hdl:10665/107791.
  18. "Appendix 19A: Healthy People 2030 Alignment With Chapters in This Book", Healthy Aging Through The Social Determinants of Health, American Public Health Association, January 2021, doi:10.2105/9780875533162app19a, ISBN 978-0-87553-315-5, S2CID 240689838, retrieved 2023-08-25
  19. Arenas, Daniel J., et al. "A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Depression, Anxiety, and Sleep Disorders in US Adults with Food Insecurity." Journal of general internal medicine (2019): 1-9. || https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05202-4
  20. Bryant, Toba; Raphael, Dennis; Schrecker, Ted; Labonte, Ronald (2011). "Canada: A land of missed opportunity for addressing the social determinants of health". Health Policy. 101 (1): 44–58. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.08.022. PMID 20888059.
  21. Islam, M M (2019). "Social Determinants of Health and Related Inequalities: Confusion and Implications". Front. Public Health. 7: 11. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2019.00011. PMC 6376855. PMID 30800646.
  22. Berdahl, Carl Thomas; Baker, Lawrence; Mann, Sean; Osoba, Osonde; Girosi, Federico (2023-02-07). "Strategies to Improve the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Health Equity: Scoping Review". JMIR AI. 2: e42936. doi:10.2196/42936. ISSN 2817-1705. S2CID 256681439.
  23. World Health Organization (2006). Constitution of the World Health Organization – Basic Documents, Forty-fifth edition (PDF) (Report). Retrieved 7 April 2013.
  24. The World Bank (2012). World Development Report 2012: Gender Equality and Development (Report). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
  25. World Health Organization (2009). Women & Health: Today's Evidence, Tomorrow's Agenda (PDF) (Report). WHO Press. Retrieved 18 March 2013.
  26. Liebler CA, Porter SR, Fernandez LE, Noon JM, Ennis SR (February 2017). "America's Churning Races: Race and Ethnicity Response Changes Between Census 2000 and the 2010 Census". Demography. 54 (1): 259–284. doi:10.1007/s13524-016-0544-0. PMC 5514561. PMID 28105578.
  27. Attina TM, Malits J, Naidu M, Trasande L (December 2018). "Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Disease Burden and Costs Related to Exposure to Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals in the US: an Exploratory Analysis". Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 108: 34–43. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.11.024. PMC 6455970. PMID 30529005.
  28. Walker RJ, Strom Williams J, Egede LE (April 2016). "Influence of Race, Ethnicity and Social Determinants of Health on Diabetes Outcomes". The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 351 (4): 366–73. doi:10.1016/j.amjms.2016.01.008. PMC 4834895. PMID 27079342.
  29. Goodman AH, Moses YT, Jones JL (2012). Race : are we so different?. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-1118233177. OCLC 822025003.
  30. Rogers RG, Lawrence EM, Hummer RA, Tilstra AM (2017-07-03). "Racial/Ethnic Differences in Early-Life Mortality in the United States". Biodemography and Social Biology. 63 (3): 189–205. doi:10.1080/19485565.2017.1281100. PMC 5729754. PMID 29035105.
  31. Spalter-Roth RM, Lowenthal TA, Rubio M (July 2005). "Race, Ethnicity, and the Health of Americans" (PDF). American Sociological Association.
  32. Williams DR (July 1997). "Race and health: basic questions, emerging directions". Annals of Epidemiology. 7 (5): 322–33. doi:10.1016/S1047-2797(97)00051-3. PMID 9250627.
  33. Penner LA, Hagiwara N, Eggly S, Gaertner SL, Albrecht TL, Dovidio JF (December 2013). "Racial Healthcare Disparities: A Social Psychological Analysis". European Review of Social Psychology. 24 (1): 70–122. doi:10.1080/10463283.2013.840973. PMC 4151477. PMID 25197206.
  34. Hofrichter R, ed. (2003). Health and Social Justice: Politics, Ideology, and Inequity in the Distribution of Disease. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. pp. 105–106. ISBN 978-0787967338.
  35. "Disparities | Adolescent and School Health |". U.S. Centers for Disease Control. 2018-08-17. Retrieved 2018-12-14.
  36. World Health Organization. The determinants of health. Geneva. Accessed 12 May 2011 (which are inter-related with all three, but mostly social factors).
  37. "Main Page". resources.envision2bwell.io. Retrieved 2023-04-21.
  38. Child Welfare League of America. "Economic Stability and SDOH" (PDF). Retrieved April 19, 2023.
  39. Ahonen, Emily Quinn; Fujishiro, Kaori; Cunningham, Thomas; Flynn, Michael (2018). "Work as an Inclusive Part of Population Health Inequities Research and Prevention". American Journal of Public Health. 108 (3): 306–311. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2017.304214. ISSN 0090-0036. PMC 5803801. PMID 29345994.
  40. Shi, L.; Starfield, B.; Kennedy, B.; Kawachi, I. (1999). "Income inequality, primary care, and health indicators". The Journal of Family Practice. 48 (4): 275–284. ISSN 0094-3509. PMID 10229252.
  41. Finkel, Adam M. (2018). "A Healthy Public Cannot Abide Unhealthy And Unsafe Workplaces". American Journal of Public Health. 108 (3): 312–313. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2017.304282. ISSN 0090-0036. PMC 5803826. PMID 29412707.
  42. Fujishiro, Kaori; Ahonen, Emily Q.; Gimeno Ruiz de Porras, David; Chen, I.-Chen; Benavides, Fernando G. (2021). "Sociopolitical values and social institutions: Studying work and health equity through the lens of political economy". SSM - Population Health. 14: 100787. doi:10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100787. ISSN 2352-8273. PMC 8056461. PMID 33898729.
  43. Silver, Sharon R.; Li, Jia; Quay, Brian (2022). "Employment status, unemployment duration, and health-related metrics among US adults of prime working age: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2018-2019". American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 65 (1): 59–71. doi:10.1002/ajim.23308. ISSN 1097-0274. PMC 8678322. PMID 34748231.
  44. "Economic Stability - Healthy People 2030 | health.gov". health.gov. Retrieved 2023-04-19.
  45. Semega, Jessica; Kollar, Melissa; Creamer, John; Mohanty, Abinash (September 2019). "Income and Poverty in the United States: 2018" (PDF).
  46. Thompson, Tess; McQueen, Amy; Kreuter, Matthew (January 17, 2019). "Social Needs and Health-Related Outcomes Among Medicaid Beneficiaries". Health Education & Behavior. 46 (3): 436–444. doi:10.1177/1090198118822724. PMID 30654655. S2CID 58612659. Retrieved April 21, 2023.
  47. Phelan, Jo C.; Link, Bruce G.; Tehranifar, Parisa (March 2010). "Social Conditions as Fundamental Causes of Health Inequalities: Theory, Evidence, and Policy Implications". Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 51 (1_suppl): S28–S40. doi:10.1177/0022146510383498. ISSN 0022-1465. PMID 20943581. S2CID 9729554.
  48. "Poverty - Healthy People 2030 | health.gov". health.gov. Retrieved 2023-04-21.
  49. Woolf, Steven H. (2009). "Social Policy as Health Policy". JAMA. 301 (11): 1166–9. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.320. PMID 19293418.
  50. Marmot, Michael G.; Bell, Ruth (2009). "Action on Health Disparities in the United States". JAMA. 301 (11): 1169–71. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.363. PMID 19293419.
  51. Currie, Janet; Rajani, Ishita (2015). "Within-Mother Estimates of the Effects of Wic on Birth Outcomes in New York City" (PDF). Economic Inquiry. 53 (4): 1691–1701. doi:10.1111/ecin.12219. PMC 5425167. PMID 28503006.
  52. Wilkinson, Richard; Marmot, Michael, eds. (2003). The Social Determinants of Health: The Solid Facts (PDF) (2nd ed.). World Health Organization Europe. ISBN 978-92-890-1371-0. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2013-03-02. Retrieved 2013-03-27.
  53. Labonté, Ronald; Schrecker, Ted (2007). "Globalization and social determinants of health: The role of the global marketplace (part 2 of 3)". Globalization and Health. 3: 6. doi:10.1186/1744-8603-3-6. PMC 1919362. PMID 17578569.
  54. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2007). Health at a Glance 2007, OECD Indicators. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Pg 25
  55. Flynn, Michael; Carreon, Tania; Eggerth, Donald; Johnson, Antoinette (2014). "Immigration, Work, and Health: A Literature Review of Immigration Between Mexico and the United States". Revista DeTrabajo Social UNAM. 7 (6): 129–149. PMC 5334002. PMID 28260831.
  56. Flynn, Michael (2015). "Undocumented Status as a Social Determinant of Occupational Safety and Health: The Workers' Perspective". Am. J. Ind. Med. 58 (11): 1127–1137. doi:10.1002/ajim.22531. PMC 4632487. PMID 26471878.
  57. World Conference on Social Determinants of Health (2011). "Rio Political Declaration on Social Determinants of Health" (PDF). World Health Organization. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2013-05-31. Retrieved 2013-03-27.
  58. Townsend, P., Davidson, N., & Whitehead, M. (Eds.). (1992). Inequalities in Health: the Black Report and the Health Divide. New York: Penguin.
  59. Bartley, M. (2003). Understanding Health Inequalities. Oxford UK: Polity Press.
  60. Graham, H. (2007). Unequal Lives: Health and Socioeconomic Inequalities. New York: Open University Press.
  61. Shaw, M.; Dorling, D.; Gordon, D.; Smith, G. D. (1999). The Widening Gap: Health Inequalities and Policy in Britain. Bristol, UK: The Policy Press.
  62. Marmot, Michael; Wilkinson, Richard G. (2005). "Social organization, stress, and health". In Marmot, Michael; Wilkinson, Richard (eds.). Social Determinants of Health. pp. 6–30. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198565895.003.02. ISBN 978-0-19-856589-5.
  63. Carlson, E. D.; Chamberlain, R. M. (2005). "Allostatic load and health disparities: A theoretical orientation". Research in Nursing & Health. 28 (4): 306–315. doi:10.1002/nur.20084. ISSN 1098-240X. PMID 16028266.
  64. Marmot, Michael; Wilkinson, Richard G. (2005). "Social patterning of individual health behaviours: The case of cigarette smoking". In Marmot, Michael; Wilkinson, Richard (eds.). Social Determinants of Health. pp. 224–37. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198565895.003.11. ISBN 978-0-19-856589-5.
  65. Wilkinson, R. G. (1996). Unhealthy Societies: The Afflictions of Inequality. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-09234-0.
  66. Lynch, J. W; Smith, G. D.; Kaplan, G. A.; House, J. S. (2000). "Income inequality and mortality: Importance to health of individual income, psychosocial environment, or material conditions". BMJ. 320 (7243): 1200–4. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7243.1200. PMC 1127589. PMID 10784551.
  67. Kawachi, I.; Kennedy, B. (2002). The Health of Nations: Why Inequality Is Harmful to Your Health. New York: New Press.
  68. Kawachi, I.; Kennedy, B. P (1997). "Socioeconomic determinants of health : Health and social cohesion: Why care about income inequality?". BMJ. 314 (7086): 1037–40. doi:10.1136/bmj.314.7086.1037. PMC 2126438. PMID 9112854.
  69. Blane, D. (2006). "The life course, the social gradient and health". In Marmot, M. G.; Wilkinson, R. G. (eds.). Social Determinants of Health (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 54–77.
  70. Lawlor, D. A; Ebrahim, S; Davey Smith, G; British women's heart health study (2002). "Socioeconomic position in childhood and adulthood and insulin resistance: Cross sectional survey using data from British women's heart and health study". BMJ. 325 (7368): 805. doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7368.805. PMC 128946. PMID 12376440.
  71. Raphael, Dennis; Anstice, Susan; Raine, Kim; McGannon, Kerry R.; Kamil Rizvi, Syed; Yu, Vanessa (2003). "The social determinants of the incidence and management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: Are we prepared to rethink our questions and redirect our research activities?". Leadership in Health Services. 16 (3): 10–20. doi:10.1108/13660750310486730.
  72. Hertzman, Clyde (2000). "The case for an early childhood development strategy" (PDF). Isuma. 1 (2): 11–8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-03-04. Retrieved 2015-05-03.
  73. Raphael, Dennis (2010). Staying Alive: Critical Perspectives on Health, Illness, and Health Care. Canada: Canadian Scholars’ Press. p. 159. ISBN 9781551303703.
  74. Landös, Aljoscha; von Arx, Martina; Cheval, Boris; Sieber, Stefan; Kliegel, Matthias; Gabriel, Rainer; Orsholits, Dan; Linden, Van Der; A, Bernadette W. (2019). "Childhood socioeconomic circumstances and disability trajectories in older men and women: a European cohort study". European Journal of Public Health. 29 (1): 50–58. doi:10.1093/eurpub/cky166. PMC 6657275. PMID 30689924.
  75. Raphael, Dennis (2016). Social Determinants of Health: Canadian Perspectives. Canada: Canadian Scholars’ Press. p. 20. ISBN 9781551308975.
  76. Cheval, Boris; Boisgontier, Matthieu P; Orsholits, Dan; Sieber, Stefan; Guessous, Idris; Gabriel, Rainer; Stringhini, Silvia; Blane, David; van der Linden, Bernadette W A (2018-02-20). "Association of early- and adult-life socioeconomic circumstances with muscle strength in older age". Age and Ageing. 47 (3): 398–407. doi:10.1093/ageing/afy003. ISSN 0002-0729. PMC 7189981. PMID 29471364.
  77. Gouin, J.-P. (2011). "Chronic Stress, Immune Dysregulation, and Health". American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine. 5 (6): 476–85. doi:10.1177/1559827610395467. S2CID 71850339.
  78. Miller, Gregory E.; Chen, Edith; Zhou, Eric S. (2007). "If it goes up, must it come down? Chronic stress and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical axis in humans". Psychological Bulletin. 133 (1): 25–45. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.25. PMID 17201569.
  79. Walburn, Jessica; Vedhara, Kavita; Hankins, Matthew; Rixon, Lorna; Weinman, John (2009). "Psychological stress and wound healing in humans: A systematic review and meta-analysis" (PDF). Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 67 (3): 253–71. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2009.04.002. PMID 19686881. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-08-09. Retrieved 2019-01-30.
  80. Cwikel, Julie; Segal-Engelchin, Dorit; Mendlinger, Sheryl (2010). "Mothers' coping styles during times of chronic security stress: effect on health status". Health Care for Women International. 31 (2): 131–52. doi:10.1080/07399330903141245. PMID 20390642. S2CID 25006806.
  81. Cohen, Sheldon; McKay, Garth (1984). "Social Support, Stress and the Buffering Hypothesis: A Theoretical Analysis" (PDF). In Baum, A.; Taylor, S.E.; Singer, J.E. (eds.). Handbook of Psychology and Health. pp. 253–67.
  82. Tengland, P.-A. (2012). "Behavior Change or Empowerment: On the Ethics of Health-Promotion Strategies". Public Health Ethics. 5 (2): 140–53. doi:10.1093/phe/phs022. hdl:2043/14851.
  83. "Ethnic and Racial Minorities & Socioeconomic Status". American Psychological Association. Retrieved 26 October 2022.
  84. RA, Bulatao; NB, Anderson. "Understanding Racial and Ethnic Differences in Health in Late Life: A Research Agenda". National Library of Medicine. National Academies Press. Retrieved 26 October 2022.
  85. Venugopal, P. Dilip; Morse, Aura Lee; Tworek, Cindy; Chang, Hoshing Wan (2020). "Socioeconomic Disparities in Vape Shop Density and Proximity to Public Schools in the Conterminous United States, 2018". Health Promotion Practice. 21 (1 Suppl): 9S–17S. doi:10.1177/1524839919887738. PMC 6988846. PMID 31908194.
  86. Wilkinson, R. & Pickett, K. (2009) The spirit level : why more equal societies almost always do better. London: Allen Lane.
  87. Pega, Frank; Nafradi, Balint; Momen, Natalie; Ujita, Yuka; Streicher, Kai; Prüss-Üstün, Annette; Technical Advisory Group (2021). "Global, regional, and national burdens of ischemic heart disease and stroke attributable to exposure to long working hours for 194 countries, 2000–2016: A systematic analysis from the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury". Environment International. 154: 106595. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2021.106595. PMC 8204267. PMID 34011457.
  88. World Health Organization (2013). The economics of social determinants of health and health inequalities: a resource book (PDF). World Health Organization. ISBN 978-92-4-154862-5. retrieved 2018-04-02
  89. Hanushek, Eric; Woessmann, Ludger (November 2010). "The Economics of International Differences in Education Achievement". Handbook of the Economics of Education. 3. Archived from the original on 2018-04-28. Retrieved 2018-04-28 – via Elsevier.
  90. Cutler, David, and Adriana Lleras-Muney (2008). “Education and Health: Evaluating Theories and Evidence.” Making Americans Healthier: Social and Economic Policy as HealthPolicy, edited by J House, R Schoeni, G Kaplan, and H Pollack. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
  91. Sabates, Ricardo; Feinstein, Leon (2006). "The role of education in the uptake of preventative health care: The case of cervical screening in Britain". Social Science & Medicine. 62 (12): 2998–3010. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.11.032. PMID 16403597.
  92. The Centre for Research on the Wider Benefits of Learning (2002). Quantitative Estimates of the Social Benefits of Learning 1: Crime (PDF). Department for Education and Skills, UK. ISBM 1-898453-36-5. Retrieved 2018-04-05.
  93. Canton, Erik (2007). "Social returns to education: Macro-evidence". De Economist. 155 (4): 449–468. doi:10.1007/s10645-007-9072-z. S2CID 154484748.
  94. Chunh, Haejoo; Muntaner, Carles (2006). "Welfare state matters: A typological multilevel analysis of wealthy countries". Health Policy. 80 (2): 328–339. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.03.004. PMID 16678294.
  95. Economic Policy Research Institute (2004). The Social and Economic Impact of South Africa's Social Security System Archived 2018-04-28 at the Wayback Machine (PDF). Commissioned by Directorate: Finance and Economics. Retrieved 2018-04-06.
  96. Pega, Frank; Liu, Sze; Walter, Stefan; Pabayo, Roman; Saith, Ruhi; Lhachimi, Stefan (2017). "Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 11 (4): CD011135. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011135.pub2. PMC 6486161. PMID 29139110.
  97. Pega, Frank; Pabayo, Roman; Benny, Claire; Lee, Eun-Young; Lhachimi, Stefan; Liu, Sze (2022). "Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2022 (3): CD011135. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011135.pub3. PMC 8962215. PMID 35348196.
  98. Breysse et al. (2004). The Relationship between Housing and Health: Children at Risk. Archived 2017-01-21 at the Wayback Machine Environ Health Perspect 112.15. pg 1583-1588.
  99. Econsult Corp (2018). The Economic Impact of Public Housing: Ongoing Investment with Wide Reaching Returns Archived 2018-11-27 at the Wayback Machine. Council of Large Public Housing Authorities.
  100. Lane Kevin J.; Stokes Eleanor C.; Seto Karen C.; Thanikachalam Sadagopan; Thanikachalam Mohan; Bell Michelle L. (2017). "Associations between Greenness, Impervious Surface Area, and Nighttime Lights on Biomarkers of Vascular Aging in Chennai, India". Environmental Health Perspectives. 125 (8): 087003. doi:10.1289/EHP541. PMC 5783666. PMID 28886599.
  101. White, Mathew P.; Elliott, Lewis R.; Gascon, Mireia; Roberts, Bethany; Fleming, Lora E. (2020-12-01). "Blue space, health and well-being: A narrative overview and synthesis of potential benefits". Environmental Research. 191: 110169. Bibcode:2020ER....191k0169W. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2020.110169. ISSN 0013-9351. PMID 32971082.
  102. Marmot, Michael G.; Bell, Ruth (2009). "Action on Health Disparities in the United States". JAMA. 301 (11): 1169–71. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.363. PMID 19293419.
  103. Farmer, Paul E.; Nizeye, Bruce; Stulac, Sara; Keshavjee, Salmaan (2006). "Structural Violence and Clinical Medicine". PLOS Medicine. 3 (10): e449. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030449. PMC 1621099. PMID 17076568.
  104. Evans, G. W.; Schamberg, M. A. (2009). "Childhood poverty, chronic stress, and adult working memory". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106 (16): 6545–9. Bibcode:2009PNAS..106.6545E. doi:10.1073/pnas.0811910106. JSTOR 40482133. PMC 2662958. PMID 19332779.
  105. Smeeding, Timothy (2006). "Poor People in Rich Nations: The United States in Comparative Perspective" (PDF). Journal of Economic Perspectives. 20: 69–90. doi:10.1257/089533006776526094. hdl:10419/95383. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2017-02-01.
  106. Smeeding, Timothy (2006). "Poor People in Rich Nations: The United States in Comparative Perspective" (PDF). Journal of Economic Perspectives. 20 (1): 69–90. doi:10.1257/089533006776526094. hdl:10419/95383. JSTOR 30033634. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2019-04-30. Retrieved 2019-12-10.
  107. "Social determinants of health: What medical students need to know". American Medical Association. Retrieved 16 Sep 2020.
  108. Gottlieb, Laura M.; Hessler, Danielle; Long, Dayna; Laves, Ellen; Burns, Abigail R.; Amaya, Anais; Sweeney, Patricia; Schudel, Christine; Adler, Nancy E. (2016-11-01). "Effects of Social Needs Screening and In-Person Service Navigation on Child Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial". JAMA Pediatrics. 170 (11): e162521. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.2521. ISSN 2168-6203. PMID 27599265.
  109. Friedman, Nicole L.; Banegas, Matthew P. (2018). "Toward Addressing Social Determinants of Health: A Health Care System Strategy". The Permanente Journal. 22 (4S): 18–095. doi:10.7812/TPP/18-095. PMC 6207437.
  110. Pega, Frank; Valentine, Nicole; Rasanathan, Kumanan; Hosseinpoor, Ahmad Reza; Neira, Maria (2017). "The need to monitor actions on the social determinants of health". Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 95 (11): 784–787. doi:10.2471/BLT.16.184622. PMC 5677605. PMID 29147060. Archived from the original on 2017-11-02. Retrieved 2017-11-02.
  111. "Healthy People 2020 Framework" (PDF). United States Department of Health and Human Services. 2010. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2013-02-15. Retrieved 2013-03-27.
  112. Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (2002). "A Child-Centred Social Investment Strategy". In Esping-Andersen, Gøsta (ed.). Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford University Press. pp. 26–67. ISBN 978-0-19-925642-6.
  113. Flynn, Michael; Check, Pietra; Eggerth, Donald; Tonda, Josana (2013). "Improving Occupational Safety and Health Among Mexican Immigrant Workers". Public Health Reports. 128 (Suppl 3): 33–38. doi:10.1177/00333549131286S306. PMC 3945447. PMID 24179277.
  114. Raphael, D. (2001). Inequality is Bad for our Hearts: Why Low Income and Social Exclusion are Major Causes of Heart Disease in Canada. North York Heart Health Network. ISBN 978-0-9689444-0-0.
  115. Pega, Frank; Veale, Jaimie (2015). "The case for the World Health Organization's Commission on Social Determinants of Health to address gender identity". American Journal of Public Health. 105 (3): e58–62. doi:10.2105/ajph.2014.302373. PMC 4330845. PMID 25602894.
  116. "Making Health Care More Affordable: Price Transparency and Eliminating 'Surprise' Billing | AHA". www.aha.org. Retrieved 2022-08-21.
  117. "Affordability Advocacy Agenda | AHA". www.aha.org. Retrieved 2022-08-21.
  118. "Affordability Advocacy Agenda | AHA". www.aha.org. Retrieved 2022-08-23.
  119. Division, News (2021-07-01). "HHS Announces Rule to Protect Consumers from Surprise Medical Bills". HHS.gov. Retrieved 2022-08-23. {{cite web}}: |first= has generic name (help)
  120. Hoadley, Jack; Lucia, Kevin (2022-02-01). "The No Surprises Act: A Bipartisan Achievement to Protect Consumers from Unexpected Medical Bills". Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 47 (1): 93–109. doi:10.1215/03616878-9417470. ISSN 0361-6878. PMID 34280259. S2CID 236141198.
  121. Fuse Brown, Erin C.; Trish, Erin; Ly, Bich; Hall, Mark; Adler, Loren (September 2020). "Out‐of‐Network Air Ambulance Bills: Prevalence, Magnitude, and Policy Solutions". The Milbank Quarterly. 98 (3): 747–774. doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12464. ISSN 0887-378X. PMC 7482379. PMID 32525223.
  122. Fuse Brown, Erin C.; McDonald, Alex; Nguyen, Ngan T. (2020). "What States Can Do to Address Out-of-Network Air Ambulance Bills". Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics. 48 (3): 462–473. doi:10.1177/1073110520958869. ISSN 1073-1105. PMID 33021184. S2CID 222143949.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.