Lolicon

In Japanese popular culture, lolicon (ロリコン, also romanized as rorikon or lolicom) is a genre of fictional media in which young (or young-looking) girl characters appear in romantic or sexual contexts. The term, a portmanteau of the English words "Lolita" and "complex", also refers to desire and affection for such characters (ロリ, "loli"), and fans of such characters and works. Associated with unrealistic and stylized imagery within manga, anime, and video games, lolicon in otaku (manga/anime fan) culture is understood as distinct from desires for realistic depictions of girls, or real girls as such,[1][2][3] and is associated with the concept of moe, or feelings of affection and love for fictional characters as such (often cute characters in manga and anime).

A depiction of young girls wearing lingerie. Lolicon art often blends childlike characteristics with erotic undertones.
Part of a series on
Anime and manga
Anime
Manga
Demographic groups
Genres
People
Fandom
General
icon Anime and manga portal

The phrase "Lolita complex", derived from the novel Lolita, entered use in Japan in the 1970s, when sexual imagery of the shōjo (idealized young girl) was expanding in the country's media. During the "lolicon boom" in adult manga of the early 1980s, the term was adopted in the nascent otaku culture to denote attraction to early bishōjo (cute girl) characters, and later to only younger-looking depictions as bishōjo designs became more varied. The artwork of the boom, strongly influenced by the round styles of shōjo manga (marketed to girls), marked a shift from previous realism and the advent of "cute eroticism" (kawaii ero), an aesthetic now common in manga and anime more broadly. The lolicon boom faded by the mid-1980s, and the genre has since made up a minority of erotic manga.

A moral panic against "harmful manga" in the 1990s has made lolicon a keyword in manga debates in Japan. Child pornography laws in some countries include depictions of fictional child characters, while those in other countries, including Japan, do not.[4] Opponents and supporters have debated if the genre contributes to child sexual abuse. Cultural critics generally identify lolicon with a broader separation between fiction and reality in otaku sexuality.

Definition and scope

Lolicon is a Japanese abbreviation of "Lolita complex" (ロリータ・コンプレックス, rorīta konpurekkusu),[5] an English-language phrase and wasei-eigo derived from Vladimir Nabokov's novel Lolita (1955) but in Japan more associated with Russell Trainer's The Lolita Complex (1966, translated 1969),[6] a work of pop psychology in which the author uses the term to describe adult male attraction to pubescent and pre-pubescent females.[7] In Japanese, the phrase was adopted to describe feelings of love and lust for young girls over adult women,[8] which remains the phrase's common meaning.[9] Due to its association with otaku (manga and anime fan) culture, however, the term today is more often used to describe desires for young or young-looking girl characters (ロリ, "loli") which are generally understood to exist and be satisfied in fiction,[10] though the meaning of the term remains contested[11] and for the public at large still carries a connotation of pedophilia.[12][13][lower-alpha 1] Lolicon also refers to sexualized works which feature such characters, and fans of these works and characters.[16] It is distinct from more formal words for pedophilia (yōji-zuki or pedofiria; clinically, shōniseiai or jidōseiai[lower-alpha 2]) and child pornography (jidō poruno[lower-alpha 3]).[11]

The meaning of lolicon in the otaku context developed in the early 1980s, during the "lolicon boom"[lower-alpha 4] in adult manga (see § History). According to editor and critic Akira Akagi, the term's meaning moved away from the sexual pairing of an older man and a young girl, and instead came to describe desire for "cuteness" and "girl-ness" in manga and anime.[17] Other critics defined lolicon as the desire for "cute things",[18] "manga-like" or "anime-like" characters, "roundness", and the "two-dimensional", as opposed to "real".[19] At the time, all eroticism in the manga style featuring cute girl (bishōjo) characters was associated with the term,[20] and synonyms of "Lolita complex" included "two-dimensional complex" (nijigen konpurekkusu), "two-dimensional fetishism" (nijikon fechi), "two-dimensional syndrome" (nijikon shōkōgun), "cute girl syndrome" (bishōjo shōkōgun), and simply "sickness" (byōki).[21][lower-alpha 5] As character body types in erotic manga became more varied by the end of the lolicon boom, the scope of the term narrowed to more young-looking depictions.[22][23]

Lolicon became a keyword in debates after the 1989 arrest of Tsutomu Miyazaki, a serial killer of young girls who was portrayed in media reports as an otaku (see § History).[24] As lolicon was conflated with desire for real children in debates on "harmful manga",[lower-alpha 6] the early meaning was replaced among otaku by moe, which refers to feelings of affection and love for characters more generally.[24] Like moe, lolicon is still used by otaku to refer to attraction that is consciously distinct from reality;[24] some otaku identify as "two-dimensional lolicon" (nijigen rorikon)[lower-alpha 7] to clarify their attraction to characters.[11] The term has become a keyword in criticism of manga and sexuality within Japan,[25] as well as globally with the spread of Japanese popular culture.[26]

History

Background

In the 1970s, shōjo manga (marketed to girls) underwent a renaissance in which artists experimented with new narratives and styles, and introduced themes such as psychology, gender, and sexuality.[27] These developments attracted adult male fans of shōjo manga, who crossed gendered boundaries to produce and consume it.[28] The first appearance of the term "Lolita complex" in manga was in Stumbling Upon a Cabbage Patch,[lower-alpha 8] an Alice in Wonderland–inspired work by Shinji Wada published in the June 1974 issue of the shōjo manga magazine Bessatsu Margaret, where a male character calls Lewis Carroll a man with a "strange character of liking only small children" in an inside joke to adult readers.[29][lower-alpha 9] Early lolicon artwork was influenced by male artists mimicking shōjo manga,[30][31] as well as erotic manga created by female artists for male readers.[9]

The image of the shōjo (young girl) became dominant in Japanese mass media by the 1970s as an idealization of cuteness, innocence, and an "idealized Eros", attributes which became attached to imagery of younger girls over time.[32] Nude photographs of shōjo, conceived as fine art, gained popularity: a photo collection entitled Nymphet: The Myth of the 12-Year-Old was published in 1969, and in 1972 and 1973 there was an "Alice boom" in nude photos themed around Alice in Wonderland.[33] Specialty adult magazines carrying nude photos, fiction, and essays on the appeal of young girls emerged in the 1980s;[34] this trend faded in the late 1980s, due to backlash and because many men preferred images of shōjo in manga and anime.[35] The spread of such imagery, both in photographs[36] and in manga,[37] may have been helped by prohibitions on displaying pubic hair under Japan's obscenity laws.[lower-alpha 10]

1970s–1980s
Front page from Hideo Azuma's first contribution to Cybele. Critic Gō Itō identifies the work as a comment on a "certain eroticism" in the roundness of Osamu Tezuka's characters.[39]

The rise of lolicon as a genre began at Comiket (Comic Market), a convention for the sale of dōjinshi (self-published works) founded in 1975 by the group Meikyu (Labyrinth), made of adult male fans of shōjo manga; in 1979, a group of male artists published the first issue of the fanzine Cybele,[40] whose standout work was an erotic parody of Little Red Riding Hood by Hideo Azuma, known as a pioneer of lolicon.[39][lower-alpha 11] Prior to Cybele, the dominant style in seinen (marketed to men) and pornographic manga was gekiga, characterized by realism, sharp angles, dark hatching, and gritty linework.[41] Azuma's work, in contrast, displayed light shading and clean, circular lines, which he saw as "thoroughly erotic" and sharing with shōjo manga a "lack of reality".[41] Azuma's combination of the stout bodies of Osamu Tezuka's manga and the emotive faces of shōjo manga marked the advent of the bishōjo character and the aesthetic of "cute eroticism" (kawaii ero).[lower-alpha 12][42] While erotic, Azuma's manga was also viewed as humorous and parodic; only a minority of readers found his style erotic at first, but a large fan base soon grew in response to the alternative to pornographic gekiga that it represented.[39][43] Erotic manga mostly moved away from combining realistic bodies and cartoony faces towards a wholly-unrealistic style.[39] Lolicon manga played a role in attracting male fans to Comiket, an event originally dominated by women (90 percent of participants were female at its first run in 1975); in 1981, the number of male and female participants was equal.[44] Lolicon, mostly created by and for men, served as a response to yaoi (manga featuring male homoeroticism), mostly created by and for women.[45]

The early 1980s saw a "lolicon boom" in professional and amateur art. The popularity of lolicon within the otaku community would attract the attention of publishers with the creation of specialty publications dedicated to the genre, including Lemon People (1982) and Manga Burikko (1982).[46] Lemon People in particular was one of the first lolicon manga magazines published in Japan, with the first issue's cover stating that it "had the monopoly on lolicon comic content in 1982", expressing the excitement over the word lolicon itself.[47] Other magazines of the boom included Manga Hot Milk, Melon Comic,[lower-alpha 13] and Halfliter.[48] The genre's rise was closely linked to the concurrent development of otaku culture and growing fan consciousness;[49] the word otaku itself was coined in Burikko in 1983.[50] Originally founded as an unprofitable gekiga magazine, the publication was transformed into a lolicon magazine in 1983 by editor Eiji Ōtsuka,[51] whose intention was to publish "shōjo manga for boys".[52][lower-alpha 14] Artwork in the magazine continued the trend started by Azuma rooted in the soft styles of shōjo manga, with less realism and fewer explicit depictions of sex;[54] in November 1983, Burikko's editors yielded to reader demands by removing photographs of gravure idol models from its opening pages, printing an issue with the subtitle "Totally Bishōjo Comic Magazine".[lower-alpha 15][55][lower-alpha 16] Lolicon magazines regularly published female artists, such as Kyoko Okazaki and Erika Sakurazawa,[54] and male artists such as Aki Uchiyama, the "King of Lolicon",[lower-alpha 17] who produced 160 pages of manga per month to meet demand.[56] Uchiyama's works were published in both niche magazines such as Lemon People and in the mainstream Shōnen Champion.[57] The first-ever pornographic anime series was Lolita Anime, released episodically in 1984–1985.[58]

Eiji Ōtsuka, editor of Manga Burikko, played a key role in the lolicon boom.

Iconic characters of the boom include Clarisse from the film Lupin III: Castle of Cagliostro (1979) and Lana from the TV series Future Boy Conan (1978), both directed by Hayao Miyazaki.[59] Clarisse was especially popular, and inspired a series of articles discussing her appeal in the anime specialty magazines Gekkan Out, Animec, and Animage,[60] as well as a trend of fan works (dubbed "Clarisse magazines"[20]) that were not explicitly sexual, but instead "fairytale-esque" and "girly".[46] Many early lolicon works combined mecha and bishōjo elements;[61] Kaoru Nagayama highlights the premiere of the Daicon III Opening Animation at the 1981 Japan SF Convention as a notable example of the link between science fiction and lolicon in the nascent otaku culture of the time.[62] Anime shows targeted at young girls with young girl heroines, such as Magical Princess Minky Momo (1982–1983), gained new viewership from adult male fans, who started fan clubs[63] and were courted by creators.[64] Helen McCarthy suggests that lolicon anime is rooted in magical girl shows such as Minky Momo, where transforming heroines can blur lines between girls and women.[65]

While the lolicon boom in commercial erotic manga only lasted until 1984,[66] it marked the beginning of its now-dominant bishōjo style.[67] Near the end of the boom, because "readers had no attachment to lolicon per se" and "did not take [young girls] as objects of sexual desire",[51] a majority of readers and creators of erotic manga moved towards the diversifying bishōjo works featuring "baby-faced and big-breasted" characters, which were no longer considered lolicon.[68] At Comiket, lolicon manga had declined in popularity by 1989 with developments in erotic dōjinshi, including new genres of fetishism and the growing popularity of softcore eroticism popular among men and women, particularly in yuri (manga with lesbian themes).[44]

1990s–present

In 1989, lolicon and otaku became the subject of a media frenzy and moral panic after the arrest of Tsutomu Miyazaki, a young man who had kidnapped and murdered four girls between the ages of four and seven and committed sexual acts with their corpses.[69] Widely disseminated photos of Miyazaki's room revealed an extensive collection of video tapes, which included horror/slasher films on which he had modelled some of his crimes,[70] and manga, including shōjo and lolicon works.[71][lower-alpha 18] In the extended public debates that followed, Miyazaki's crimes were blamed on supposed media effects: namely, a reduction in his inhibitions to crime, and a blurring of the lines between fiction and reality.[73] Miyazaki was labelled as an otaku, and an image of otaku as "socially and sexually immature" men, and for some as "pedophiles and potential predators", was established for much of the public.[74] The decade saw local crackdowns on retailers and publishers of "harmful manga", and the arrests of some dōjinshi artists.[75][76] Despite this, lolicon imagery expanded and became more acceptable within manga in the 1990s,[77] and the early 2000s saw a small boom in the genre sparked by the magazine Comic LO.[78]

Media

Lolicon media is loosely defined. Some define its characters by age, while others define its characters by appearance (those that are small and flat-chested, independent of age).[10] Lolicon works often depict girl characters as innocent, precocious, and sometimes flirtatious;[79] characters may appear in borderline or outright sexual situations, though the term can be applied to works with neither (see § Relation to moe).[79]

According to Kaoru Nagayama, manga readers define lolicon works as those "with a heroine younger than a middleschool student", a definition which can vary from characters under age 18 for "society at large", to characters "younger than gradeschool-aged" for "fanatics", and to "kindergarteners" for "more pedophiliac readers".[80] Elisabeth Klar observes that girl characters in lolicon can show an "contradictory performance of age" in which their body, behavior, and role in a story conflict;[81] an example is the roribabā[lower-alpha 19] ("Lolita granny") archetype, a girl character who speaks with the mannerisms of an old woman.[82] Curvy hips and other secondary sex characteristics similarly appear as features in some of the genre's characters.[83] Plot devices often explain the young appearance of characters who are non-human or actually much older.[84]

Lolicon manga, often published as dōjinshi or compiled in anthology magazines,[85] is mostly consumed by male audiences,[9][lower-alpha 20] though Nagayama notes that the works of Hiraku Machida have "resonated with female readers" and "earned the support of women".[87] Other notable artists include Aguda Wanyan and Takarada Gorgeous.[88] Female creators of lolicon works include Erika Wada[89] and Fumio Kagami.[90]

Lolicon imagery is a prominent theme in Superflat, a manga-influenced contemporary art movement founded by Takashi Murakami. Prominent Superflat artists whose works feature lolicon imagery include Mr. and Henmaru Machino.[91] Murakami himself did a lolicon-inspired photoshoot with Britney Spears for the cover of the magazine Pop.[92]

Relation to moe

In the 1990s, lolicon imagery evolved and contributed to the mainstream development of moe, the generalized affective response to fictional characters (typically bishōjo characters in manga, anime, and computer games) and its associated design elements.[14][93] The bishōjo character form moved from niche, otaku publications to mainstream manga magazines, and saw explosive popularity in the decade with the rise of bishōjo games and anime series such as Sailor Moon and Neon Genesis Evangelion, which pioneered media and merchandising based on fan affection for their female protagonists.[94] Moe characters, which tend to be physically immature girl characters exemplified by cuteness,[95] are ubiquitous in contemporary manga and anime.[96] In contrast to lolicon works, sexuality in moe is treated indirectly[14] or not at all;[97] the moe response is often defined with emphasis on platonic love.[98]

John Oppliger of AnimeNation identifies Ro-Kyu-Bu!, Kodomo no Jikan, and Moetan as examples of series which challenge the distinction between moe and lolicon through use of sexual innuendo, commenting that they "satire the chaste sanctity of the moé phenomenon" and "poke fun at viewers and the arbitrary delineations that viewers assert".[97] "Moe-style" lolicon works depict mild eroticism, such as glimpses of underwear, and forgo explicit sex.[99]

Genre features

Akira Akagi identified five themes in lolicon manga in 1993: sadomasochism, "groping objects" (alien tentacles or robots in the role of the penis), "mecha fetishes" (combinations of a machine and a girl), erotic parodies of mainstream anime and manga, and "simply indecent or perverted stuff", also noting common themes of lesbianism and masturbation.[100] Media scholar Setsu Shigematsu argues that these forms of substitution and mimicry enable lolicon to "transform straight sex into a parodic form".[101] More extreme works depict themes including coercion, rape, incest, bondage, and hermaphroditism.[102]

Nagayama argues that most pornographic lolicon manga deal with a "consciousness of sin", or a sense of taboo and guilt in its consumption.[103] Some manga manage this by portraying the girl as enjoying the experience in the end, while others represent the girl as the active partner in sex who seduces men to her.[104] Other lolicon manga, where "men are absolute evil and girls are pitiable victims", indulge in the "pleasure of sin" through the breaking of taboos,[105] which he argues affirms the fragility of the characters.[106] He posits that manga depicting sex between children avoid the "consciousness of sin" via mutual innocence, while also thematizing nostalgia and an idealized past,[107] while other lolicon manga accomplish this through characters with especially unrealistic and moe designs, where "it is precisely because fiction is distinguished from reality as fiction that one can experience moe".[108]

Legality and censorship
See also: Legal status of fictional pornography depicting minors

Child pornography laws in some countries, including the United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia, have expanded since the 1990s to include sexually explicit depictions of fictional child characters, while those in other countries, including Japan and the United States, exclude fiction from relevant definitions.[4]

In 1999, Japan passed a national law criminalizing the production and distribution of child pornography.[109] The law's original draft included depictions of fictional children in its definition of child pornography; after "criticism from many in Japan", this text was removed in the final version.[110] In 2014, Japan's parliament amended the 1999 law to criminalize possession of child pornography;[109] the 2013 draft introduced by the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP), which maintained the existing legal definition, included a provision for a government investigation on whether manga, anime, and computer-generated images "similar to child pornography" were connected to child sexual abuse, which would be followed by a later decision on regulation.[111] This provision was opposed by anime and manga artist and publishing associations, which argued that regulation would infringe on freedom of expression and negatively impact the creative industry[112] and cited a lack of existing evidence linking fiction and crime.[113] The provision was removed from the law's final version, which took effect in 2015.[114]

Lolicon media is a common target of local ordinances in Japan which restrict distribution of materials designated "harmful to the healthy development of youth",[115] which were strengthened throughout the 1990s and 2000s.[116] An amendment proposed in 2010 to the Tokyo law on material banned from sale to minors (described by Vice Governor Naoki Inose as targeting non-pornographic lolicon manga, writing that "We had regulation for eromanga, but not for lolicon"[117]) restricted depictions of "non-existent youths" who appeared under age 18 and were portrayed in "anti-social sexual situations".[118][lower-alpha 21] Under massive opposition from manga creators, academics, and fans,[120][121][122] the bill was rejected in June 2010 by Tokyo Metropolitan Assembly;[123] however, a revision passed in December 2010 which restricts "manga, anime, and computer games" where any characters engage in "sexual or pseudo sexual acts that would be illegal in real life" depicted in a way that "glorifies or exaggerates" such acts.[124] In 2011, several manga were listed for restriction, including Oku-sama wa Shōgakusei ("My Wife Is an Elementary Student"), which had been previously criticized on television by Inose.[125] It was later published online by J-Comi, avoiding restriction.[126][lower-alpha 22]

Sexualized depictions of young girl characters have also been subject to censorship and restriction outside of Japan. In 2006, North American publisher Seven Seas Entertainment licensed the manga series Kodomo no Jikan for release under the title Nymphet, but cancelled its plans in 2007 after vendor cancellations. In a statement, the company noted that the manga "cannot be considered appropriate for the US market by any reasonable standard".[128] In 2020, Australian senator Stirling Griff criticized the Australian Classification Board for giving ratings to manga and anime depicting "child exploitation", and called for a review of classification regulations;[129] later in the year, the board banned the import and sale of three volumes of the light novel series No Game No Life for sexualized depiction of young characters.[130][lower-alpha 23] Some online platforms, including Discord and Reddit, ban lolicon content.[132][133]

Debate

Explaining the exclusion of lolicon from the 2014 amendment to Japan's child pornography laws, an LDP lawmaker stated that "Manga, anime, and CG child pornography don't directly violate the rights of girls or boys. It has not been scientifically validated that it even indirectly causes damage. Since it hasn't been validated, punishing people who view it would go too far;"[134] his statement echoes activist arguments.[135] Statistically, sexual abuse of minors in Japan has declined since the 1960s and 1970s while the prevalence of fictional lolicon has increased;[136] Patrick W. Galbraith interprets this as evidence that lolicon imagery does not necessarily influence crimes and argues that lolicon characters do not necessarily represent real boys or girls, but rather what McLelland calls a "third gender," [77] while Steven Smet suggests that lolicon is an "exorcism of fantasies" that contributes to Japan's low crime rates.[137] Galbraith further argues that otaku culture collectively promotes a media literacy and ethical position of separating fiction and reality, especially when the conflation of the two would be dangerous.[138] Drawing on his fieldwork as an anthropologist, he writes that the sexual imagination of otaku, including lolicon, "did not lead to 'immoral acts', but rather ethical activity".[139] A 2012 report by the Sexologisk Klinik for the Danish government found no evidence that cartoons and drawings depicting fictive child sexual abuse encourage real abuse.[140] Academic Sharalyn Orbaugh argues that manga depicting underage sexuality can help victims of child sexual abuse to work through their own trauma, and that there is greater harm in regulating sexual expression than potential harm caused by such manga.[141]

Legal scholar Hiroshi Nakasatomi argues that lolicon can distort readers' sexual desires and induce crime, and that it violates the rights of children,[142] a view shared by the non-profit organization CASPAR (founded after the Miyazaki case).[143] Some critics, such as the non-profit organization Lighthouse, claim that lolicon works can be used for child grooming, and that they engender a culture that is accepting of sexual abuse.[144][145] Guidelines released in 2019 by the United Nations Human Rights Committee encouraged state parties to include explicit drawings of fictional children in laws against child pornography, "in particular when such representations are used as part of a process to sexually exploit children".[146] Feminist critic Kuniko Funabashi argues that lolicon manga contributes to sexual violence by portraying girls passively and by "presenting the female body as the man's possession".[147] Legal scholar Shin'ichirō Harata argues that child pornography laws should not collapse reality and fiction together, but also that fans should not dismiss an ambivalence represented by lolicon. He describes the practice of keeping the two separated as the "ethics of moe", or "responsibility of otaku".[148]

Dilton Rocha Ferraz Ribeiro analyzes the debate over the legal status of lolicon works in Japan and finds that both the pro-regulation and anti-regulation coalitions are relatively stable, with each reacting to actions by the other coalition.[112] Catherine Driscoll and Liam Grealy argue that these debates, including international pressure on Japan to regulate these works, create a "discourse of Japanese exceptionalism" to international norms.[149]

Critical commentary

Cultural critics responding to lolicon generally emphasize it as distinct from attraction to real young girls.[150] Anthropologist Patrick W. Galbraith finds that "from early writings to the present, researchers suggest that lolicon artists are playing with symbols and working with tropes, which does not reflect or contribute to sexual pathology or crime".[24] Psychologist Tamaki Saitō, who has conducted clinical work with otaku,[151] highlights the estrangement of lolicon desires from reality as part of a strict distinction for otaku between "textual and actual sexuality", and observes that "the vast majority of otaku are not pedophiles in actual life".[152][lower-alpha 24] Manga researcher Yukari Fujimoto argues that lolicon desire "is not for a child, but for the image itself", and that this is understood by those "brought up in [Japan's] culture of drawing and fantasy".[154] Cultural historian Mark McLelland identifies lolicon and yaoi as "self-consciously anti-realist" genres, given a rejection by fans and creators of "three-dimensionality" in favor of "two-dimensionality",[155] and compares lolicon to the yaoi fandom, in which largely female and heterosexual fans consume depictions of male homosexuality which "lack any correspondent in the real world".[156][lower-alpha 25] Setsu Shigematsu argues that lolicon reflects a shift in "erotic investment" from reality to "two-dimensional figures of desire".[158] Queer theorist Yuu Matsuura argues that two-dimensional characters are non-human "artifacts" and that desire oriented to such characters is not a desire toward humans.[159][160] Matsuura criticizes the consideration of two-dimensional lolicon as "child pornography" as being "interpersonal sexuality centrism" (対人性愛中心主義, taijin seiai chūshin shugi),[161] a term they use to refer to the marginalization of fictosexuals or Nijikon.[162][160]

Most scholars also identify lolicon as a form of self-expression on the part of its male creators and consumers.[163] Sociologist Sharon Kinsella suggests that for lolicon fans, "the infantilized female object of desire [...] has crossed over to become an aspect of their own self image and sexuality".[164] Akira Akagi argues that lolicon manga represented a notable shift in reader identification from the "hero" penetrator common to pornographic gekiga: "Lolicon readers do not need a penis for pleasure, but rather they need the ecstasy of the girl. [...] They identify with the girl, and get caught up in a masochistic pleasure."[165] Manga critic Gō Itō views this as an "abstract desire", quoting lolicon artist who told him that "he was the girl who is raped in his manga", reflecting a feeling of being "raped by society, or by the world".[166] Kaoru Nagayama posits that lolicon readers adopt a fluid perspective that alternates between that of an omniscient voyeur and the multiple characters in a work,[8] reflecting an active reader role and a projection onto girl characters.[167] Writing in The Book of Otaku (1989), feminist Chizuko Ueno argued that lolicon, as an orientation towards fictional bishōjo, is "completely different from pedophilia", and characterized it as a desire to "be part of the 'cute' world of shōjo" for male fans of shōjo manga who "find it too much to be a man".[168]

Several scholars identify the emergence of lolicon with changes in Japanese gender relations. Sociologist Kimio Itō attributes the rise of lolicon manga to a shift in the 1970s and 1980s, when boys, driven by a feeling that girls were "surpassing them in terms of willpower and action", turned to the "world of imagination", in which young girl characters are "easy to control".[169] Kinsella interprets lolicon as part of a "gaze of both fear and desire" stimulated by the growing power of women in society, and as a reactive desire to see the shōjo "infantilized, undressed, and subordinate".[170] Media scholar Chizuko Naitō views lolicon as reflecting a "societal desire in a broader sense" for young girls as sex symbols in Japan (which she calls a "loliconized society").[171] Christine Yano argues that eroticized imagery of the shōjo, "real or fictive", reflects "heteronormative pedophilia" in which emphasis is placed on the ephemerality of childhood: "it is as child that [the shōjo] becomes precious as a transitory figure threatened by impending adulthood".[172]

Responding in 1982 to the popularity of Clarisse from his film Lupin III: Castle of Cagliostro, Hayao Miyazaki criticized artists and fans who idolized her in what he considered a demeaning manner,[84] and said that he "hate[d] men who use the word lolicon."[173] Despite his apparent rejection, Saitō and Galbraith still find connections between Miyazaki and desire for young girl characters.[174] Interpreting Miyazaki's own words and his acknowledgment of eroticism as key to his creative process, Galbraith suggests that the distance between Miyazaki and the lolicon boom was about "shame": he criticized men who were open and playful about lolicon desire for having little shame, while he felt embarrassment about his own "longing" for girl characters.[175]

See also
  • Hentai – anime and manga pornography
  • Junior idol – child or early teenager pursuing a career as a photographic model
  • Lolita fashion – Japanese fashion style and subculture
  • Shotacon – male equivalent of lolicon, focusing on young boy characters
  • Simulated child pornography – produced without direct involvement of children

Notes
  1. Translator Matt Alt states that the term is treated as "something of a four-letter word [...] virtually synonymous with pedophilia",[14] and Patrick W. Galbraith similarly writes that "'lolicon' is often almost synonymous with 'pedophilia' for critics today".[15]
  2. yōji-zuki (幼児好き); pedofiria (ペドフィリア); shōniseiai (小児性愛); jidōseiai (児童性愛)
  3. jidō poruno (児童ポルノ)
  4. ロリコンブーム
  5. nijigen konpurekkusu (二次元コンプレックス); nijikon fechi (二次元コンフェチ); nijikon shōkōgun (二次元コン症候群); bishōjo shōkōgun (美少女症候群); byōki (病気)
  6. yūgai komikku, 有害コミック, or yūgai manga, 有害漫画
  7. 二次元ロリコン
  8. Kyabetsu-batake de Tsumazuite (キャベツ畑でつまずいて)
  9. See Lewis Carroll § Sexuality.
  10. When obscenity enforcement against depictions of pubic hair was partially eased in 1991, facilitating a trend of "hair nude" photo books, depictions in manga and anime continued to be regulated.[38]
  11. ロリコン漫画の元祖
  12. かわいいエロ
  13. メロンCOMIC
  14. Ōtsuka also edited Petit Apple Pie, an anthology series featuring works from the artists of Manga Burikko without eroticism; it is also remembered as a lolicon publication.[51][53]
  15. 絶対美少女コミックマガジン
  16. For example, one reader wrote in a letter published in the August 1983 issue: "I have a two-dimensional complex (nijigen konpurekkusu). I don't feel anything for the photographs in the opening pages. For that reason, I'd like you to stop with the pictures and run only manga."[55]
  17. ロリコン漫画の帝王
  18. Some journalists in the room later revealed that Miyazaki had owned only a few adult manga, which were moved to the foreground of photographs and created a false impression.[72]
  19. ロリババア
  20. Reader survey results published in the November 1983 issue of Manga Burikko showed that 80 percent of respondents were male, 15 percent were female, and 5 percent were undisclosed.[86]
  21. The proposed restrictions also required labelling such works and zoning them in adult sections, which was opposed in anticipation of a chilling effect on artists and publishers and expected self-censorship.[119]
  22. The first work to be formally restricted as "harmful" under the expanded law was the manga Imōto Paradise! 2 in 2014.[127]
  23. Light novels, including No Game No Life, typically include manga-style illustrations.[131]
  24. Saitō further suggests that it is a distinct and separate "fictional space" that enables lolicon to be approached as a fantasy.[153]
  25. McLelland draws on Saitō's observations that the "imaginary sex lives" of female yaoi fans are "totally separate from their everyday sexual lives", and that "many lead heterosexual lives, but their fictionally oriented sexuality turns to male homosexual relationships".[157]

References

Citations
  1. Galbraith 2016, pp. 113–114: "Given its importance, it is not surprising that lolicon has been well researched in Japan over the course of decades, which has led to numerous insights. [...] Characters are not compensating for something more 'real,' but rather are in their fiction the object of affection. This has been described as 'finding sexual objects in fiction in itself', which in discussions of lolicon is made explicitly distinct from desire for and abuse of children."
  2. McLelland 2011b, p. 16: "Japanese scholarship has, on the whole, argued that, in the case of Japanese fans, neither the Loli nor the BL fandom represent the interests of paedophiles since moe characters are not objectified in the same manner that actual images of children can be, rather they express aspects of their creators' or consumers' own identities."
  3. Kittredge 2014, p. 524: "The majority of the cultural critics responding to the Japanese otaku's erotic response to lolicon images emphasize, like Keller, that no children are harmed in the production of these images and that looking with desire at a stylized drawing of a young girl is not the same as lusting after an actual child."
  4. McLelland, Mark (2016). "Introduction: Negotiating 'cool Japan' in research and teaching". In McLelland, Mark (ed.). The End of Cool Japan: Ethical, Legal, and Cultural Challenges to Japanese Popular Culture. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 1–30 [11]. ISBN 978-1-317-26937-3.
  5. Nihon Kokugo Daijiten. "ロリコンとは？ 意味や使い方" [What is "lolicon"? Meaning and usage]. Kotobank [コトバンク] (in Japanese). Retrieved 19 July 2023. 〘名〙 「ロリータコンプレックス」の略。([noun] abbreviation of "Lolita complex")
  6. Takatsuki 2010, p. 6, cited in Galbraith 2011, p. 94.
  7. Stapleton, Adam (2016). "All seizures great and small: Reading contentious images of minors in Japan and Australia". In McLelland, Mark (ed.). The End of Cool Japan: Ethical, Legal, and Cultural Challenges to Japanese Popular Culture. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 134–162 [136]. ISBN 978-1-317-26937-3.
  8. Nagayama 2020, p. 117.
  9. Shigematsu 1999, p. 129.
  10. Galbraith 2021, p. 163.
  11. Galbraith 2017, p. 119.
  12. Galbraith 2019, p. 65, 68–69
  13. Galbraith 2023, p. 3: "Today, lolicon is understood in at least three ways: as a subgenre of or tag for pornographic comics and cartoons specifically interested in young characters; as more generalized interest in manga/anime-style cute girls; and as something synonymous with child abuse material. It is also used casually to refer to men interested in younger women and girls."
  14. Alt, Matt (15 October 2014). "Pharrell Williams's Lolicon Video". The New Yorker. Archived from the original on 13 August 2021. Retrieved 7 August 2021.
  15. Galbraith 2021, p. 65.
  16. Galbraith 2012, p. 348.
  17. Akagi 1993, p. 230, cited in Galbraith 2011, p. 102.
  18. Nagayama 2020, p. 87.
  19. Galbraith 2019, p. 21.
  20. Galbraith 2016, p. 113.
  21. Galbraith 2019, p. 54.
  22. Nagayama 2020, p. 121.
  23. Galbraith 2023, p. 3.
  24. Galbraith 2016, p. 114.
  25. Galbraith 2021, p. 47.
  26. Galbraith 2016, p. 110.
  27. Galbraith 2019, p. 20.
  28. Galbraith 2016, pp. 111–112.
  29. Galbraith 2019, p. 28.
  30. Schodt 1996, p. 55.
  31. Kinsella 1998, pp. 304–306.
  32. Galbraith 2011, pp. 86–87.
  33. Takatsuki 2010, pp. 50, 55, cited in Galbraith 2011, pp. 94.
  34. Takatsuki 2010, pp. 47, cited in Galbraith 2011, pp. 94–95.
  35. Takatsuki 2010, pp. 64–65, cited in Galbraith 2011, p. 95.
  36. Galbraith 2011, p. 94.
  37. Schodt 1996, pp. 54–55.
  38. Galbraith 2011, p. 118.
  39. Galbraith 2011, p. 95.
  40. Galbraith 2019, pp. 26–28.
  41. Galbraith 2019, pp. 28–30.
  42. Galbraith 2019, p. 31.
  43. Galbraith 2019, p. 32.
  44. Lam, Fan-Yi (2010). "Comic Market: How the World's Biggest Amateur Comic Fair Shaped Japanese Dōjinshi Culture". Mechademia. 5 (1): 232–248 [236–239].
  45. Galbraith 2019, p. 33.
  46. Galbraith 2011, p. 97.
  47. Kimi, Rito (2021). The History of Hentai Manga: An Expressionist Examination of Eromanga. FAKKU. p. 26. ISBN 978-1-63442-253-6.
  48. Galbraith 2011, p. 117.
  49. Galbraith 2011, pp. 96–99.
  50. Galbraith 2019, p. 55.
  51. Nagayama 2020, p. 92.
  52. Nagayama 2020, p. 190.
  53. Galbraith 2019, p. 271.
  54. Galbraith 2011, p. 102.
  55. Galbraith 2011, p. 101.
  56. Galbraith 2016, pp. 113, 115.
  57. Galbraith 2016, p. 115.
  58. Galbraith 2019, p. 40.
  59. Galbraith 2019, pp. 98–99.
  60. Takatsuki 2010, pp. 97–98, cited in Galbraith 2011, p. 96.
  61. Nagayama 2020, p. 90.
  62. Nagayama 2020, p. 89.
  63. Galbraith 2019, pp. 37–38.
  64. Galbraith 2011, p. 98.
  65. McCarthy, Helen; Clements, Jonathan (1998). The Erotic Anime Movie Guide. Woodstock: Overlook Press. p. 43. ISBN 978-0-87951-705-2.
  66. Nagayama 2020, pp. 91–92.
  67. Nagayama 2020, pp. 89–90.
  68. Nagayama 2020, pp. 121, 138.
  69. Galbraith 2019, pp. 66–69.
  70. Galbraith 2019, pp. 67–68.
  71. Kinsella 1998, pp. 308–309.
  72. Galbraith 2019, p. 68.
  73. Galbraith 2019, p. 67.
  74. Galbraith 2019, pp. 68–69.
  75. Gravett, Paul (2004). Manga: Sixty Years of Japanese Comics. London: Laurence King Publishing. p. 136. ISBN 1-85669-391-0.
  76. Schodt 1996, pp. 55–59.
  77. Galbraith 2011, p. 105.
  78. Nagayama 2020, pp. 134–135.
  79. Aoki, Deb (9 August 2019). "Manga Answerman - Is Translating 'Lolicon' as 'Pedophile' Accurate?". Anime News Network. Archived from the original on 7 June 2021. Retrieved 16 June 2021.
  80. Nagayama 2020, pp. 118–119.
  81. Klar, Elisabeth (2013). "Tentacles, Lolitas, and Pencil Strokes: The Parodist Body in European and Japanese Erotic Comics". In Berndt, Jaqueline; Kümmerling-Meibauer, Bettina (eds.). Manga's Cultural Crossroads. New York: Routledge. p. 132. ISBN 978-0-415-50450-8.
  82. Galbraith 2021, p. 129.
  83. Galbraith 2011, pp. 109, 115.
  84. Galbraith, Patrick W. (2009). "Lolicon". The Otaku Encyclopedia: An Insider's Guide to the Subculture of Cool Japan. Tokyo: Kodansha International. pp. 128–129. ISBN 978-4-7700-3101-3.
  85. Galbraith 2011, p. 90.
  86. Galbraith 2019, p. 267.
  87. Nagayama 2020, pp. 47, 131.
  88. Nagayama 2020, pp. 125–129.
  89. Nagayama 2020, p. 123.
  90. Nagayama 2020, p. 192.
  91. Darling, Michael (2001). "Plumbing the Depths of Superflatness". Art Journal. 60 (3): 76–89 [82, 86]. doi:10.2307/778139. JSTOR 778139.
  92. Ashcraft, Brian (27 August 2010). "NSFW: Was Britney Spears Bamboozled Into Virtual Child Porn Protest Art?". Kotaku. Retrieved 9 October 2021.
  93. Galbraith 2012, pp. 348–351.
  94. Galbraith 2019, pp. 113–115.
  95. Galbraith 2012, pp. 351, 354.
  96. Galbraith 2012, p. 344.
  97. Oppliger, John (1 November 2013). "Ask John: Are Moé and Lolicon the Same Thing?". AnimeNation. Archived from the original on 13 July 2019. Retrieved 29 September 2021.
  98. Galbraith 2012, p. 356.
  99. Galbraith 2011, p. 119.
  100. Akagi 1993, pp. 230–231, cited in Shigematsu 1999, pp. 129–130.
  101. Shigematsu 1999, pp. 129–130.
  102. Matthews, Chris (2011). "Manga, Virtual Child Pornography, and Censorship in Japan" (PDF). In Center for Applied Ethics and Philosophy (ed.). Applied Ethics: Old Wine in New Bottles?. Sapporo: Hokkaido University. pp. 165–174 [165–167]. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 July 2021. Retrieved 12 July 2021.
  103. Nagayama 2020, p. 122.
  104. Nagayama 2020, pp. 123–125.
  105. Nagayama 2020, p. 127.
  106. Nagayama 2020, pp. 127–128.
  107. Nagayama 2020, pp. 132–134.
  108. Nagayama 2020, p. 136.
  109. Fletcher, James (7 January 2015). "Why hasn't Japan banned child-porn comics?". BBC News. Archived from the original on 13 March 2021. Retrieved 5 March 2021.
  110. Nagayama 2020, p. 109.
  111. Hodgkins, Crystalyn (30 May 2013). "Japan Animation Creators Assoc. Adds Opposition to New Child Porn Revision Bill". Anime News Network. Archived from the original on 21 September 2021. Retrieved 20 September 2021.
  112. Rocha Ferraz Ribeiro, Dilton (2021). "An advocacy coalition analysis of the game RapeLay: the regulation of sexual violence and virtual pornography in Japan". Civitas - Revista de Ciências Sociais. 20 (3): 454–463. doi:10.15448/1984-7289.2020.2.30279.
  113. Yoshinaga, Takeo; Ohara, Atsushi (27 July 2013). "Controversy raging over revisions to child pornography law". The Asahi Shimbun. Archived from the original on 2 September 2013. Retrieved 28 July 2013.
  114. Hiroshi, Kawamoto (5 June 2014). "Japan nears outlawing possession of child pornography". The Asahi Shimbun. Archived from the original on 20 November 2015. Retrieved 28 June 2021.
  115. McLelland 2011a, p. 5.
  116. Nagayama 2020, pp. 238, 242–243.
  117. Nagayama 2020, p. 244.
  118. McLelland 2011a, pp. 3–4.
  119. McLelland 2011a, p. 8.
  120. Galbraith 2011, p. 115.
  121. Nagayama 2020, p. 246.
  122. Loo, Egan (15 March 2010). "Creators Decry Tokyo's Proposed 'Virtual' Child Porn Ban (Update 7)". Anime News Network. Archived from the original on 25 September 2017. Retrieved 28 November 2010.
  123. Loo, Egan (16 June 2010). "Tokyo's 'Nonexistent Youth' Bill Rejected by Assembly". Anime News Network. Archived from the original on 23 July 2017. Retrieved 28 November 2010.
  124. McLelland 2011a, pp. 11–12.
  125. Loo, Egan (16 May 2011). "1st Manga to Be Restricted by Revised Tokyo Law Listed (Updated)". Anime News Network. Archived from the original on 21 September 2021. Retrieved 5 October 2021.
  126. Loo, Egan (3 October 2011). "Akamatsu's J-Comi Site Posts Adult Manga Restricted by Tokyo Law". Anime News Network. Archived from the original on 23 October 2017. Retrieved 14 May 2013.
  127. Nelkin, Sarah (12 May 2014). "Imōto Paradise! 2 Manga to Be Restricted as 'Unhealthy' in Tokyo". Anime News Network. Archived from the original on 18 June 2014. Retrieved 28 June 2021.
  128. Galbraith 2016, p. 117.
  129. MacLennan, Leah (28 February 2020). "Anime and manga depicting sexual images of children spark calls for review of classification laws". ABC News. Retrieved 6 October 2021.
  130. Mateo, Alex (11 August 2020). "Australia Bans Import, Sales of 3 'No Game, No Life' Novels (Updated)". Anime News Network. Archived from the original on 20 September 2021. Retrieved 19 September 2021.
  131. Morrissy, Kim (19 October 2016). "What's A Light Novel?". Anime News Network. Retrieved 7 October 2021.
  132. Alexander, Julia (26 July 2018). "Discord strikes popular server over NSFW room reportedly sharing offensive images". Polygon. Retrieved 6 October 2021.
  133. "Do Not Post Sexual or Suggestive Content Involving Minors". Reddit Help. Retrieved 6 October 2021.
  134. Adelstein, Jake; Kubo, Angela Erika (3 June 2014). "Japan's Kiddie Porn Empire: Bye-Bye?". The Daily Beast. Archived from the original on 2 May 2021. Retrieved 25 July 2021.
  135. Galbraith, Patrick W.; Bauwens-Sugimoto, Jessica (2020b). "Translators' Introduction: Eromanga in the Global Now" (PDF). Erotic Comics in Japan: An Introduction to Eromanga. By Nagayama, Kaoru. Translated by Galbraith, Patrick W.; Bauwens-Sugimoto, Jessica. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. p. 14. ISBN 978-94-6372-712-9.
  136. Takatsuki 2010, pp. 258–262, cited in Galbraith 2011, p. 107.
  137. Smet, Steven (1995). "Cream Lemon: An Almost Complete Overview". JAMM: the Japanese Animation and Manga Magazine. No. 4. Japan Communication. p. 39, cited in McCarthy & Clements 1998, p. 43.
  138. Galbraith 2021.
  139. Galbraith 2021, p. 312.
  140. "Report: cartoon paedophilia harmless". The Copenhagen Post. 23 July 2012. Archived from the original on 3 April 2021. Retrieved 8 January 2021.
  141. Orbaugh, Sharalyn (2016). "Manga, anime, and child pornography law in Canada". In McLelland, Mark (ed.). The End of Cool Japan: Ethical, Legal, and Cultural Challenges to Japanese Popular Culture. London and New York: Routledge. pp. 94–108 [104–106]. ISBN 978-1-317-26937-3.
  142. Nakasatomi, Hiroshi (2013). Translated by Norma, Caroline. "'Rapelay' and the problem of legal reform in Japan: Government regulation of graphically animated pornography". Electronic Journal of Contemporary Japanese Studies. 12 (3). Archived from the original on 5 September 2021. Retrieved 30 June 2021.
  143. Macdonald, Christopher (13 January 2005). "Lolicon Backlash in Japan". Anime News Network. Archived from the original on 20 January 2018. Retrieved 7 June 2007.
  144. Reynolds, Isabel (11 March 2008). "UNICEF says Japan failing to control child porn". Reuters. Archived from the original on 25 July 2021. Retrieved 25 July 2021.
  145. Ripley, Will; Whiteman, Hillary; Henry, Edmund (18 June 2014). "Sexually explicit Japan manga evades new laws on child pornography". CNN. Archived from the original on 20 February 2021. Retrieved 25 July 2021.
  146. Sherman, Jennifer; Hodgkins, Crystalyn (1 December 2019). "UN Human Rights Committee's New Guidelines for Child Pornography Express 'Deep Concerns' About Drawings". Anime News Network. Archived from the original on 9 July 2021. Retrieved 30 June 2021.
  147. Funabashi, Kuniko (1995). "Pornographic Culture and Sexual Violence". In Fujimura-Fanselow, Kumiko; Kameda, Atsuko (eds.). Japanese Women: New Feminist Perspectives on the Past, Present, and Future. New York: Feminist Press at the City University of New York. pp. 255–263 [258, 261–262]. ISBN 1-55861-093-6.
  148. Galbraith 2021, pp. 188–189.
  149. Driscoll, Catherine; Grealy, Liam (2019). "In the name of the nation: Media classification, globalisation, and exceptionalism". International Journal of Cultural Studies. 22 (3): 394. doi:10.1177/1367877918784606. ISSN 1367-8779.
  150. Kittredge, Katharine (2014). "Lethal Girls Drawn for Boys: Girl Assassins in Manga/Anime and Comics/Film". Children's Literature Association Quarterly. 39 (4): 506–532 [524]. doi:10.1353/chq.2014.0059. S2CID 143630310.
  151. Galbraith 2011, pp. 105–106.
  152. Saitō 2007, pp. 227–228.
  153. Galbraith 2011, pp. 106, 119.
  154. Galbraith 2017, pp. 114–115.
  155. McLelland 2011b, p. 14.
  156. McLelland 2011b, pp. 14–15.
  157. Saitō 2007, pp. 229, 232.
  158. Shigematsu 1999, p. 138.
  159. Matsuura 2022, p. 146.
  160. Liao, SH. "Fictosexual Manifesto: Their Position, Political Possibility, and Critical Resistance". 《Rhizome｜球根》. NTU-OtaStudy (臺大宅研).
  161. Matsuura 2022, p. 153.
  162. Matsuura 2022, p. 150.
  163. McLelland 2011b, p. 16.
  164. Kinsella 2000, p. 122.
  165. Akagi 1993, p. 232, cited in Galbraith 2011, p. 103.
  166. Galbraith 2011, pp. 102–103.
  167. Nagayama 2020, p. 119: "At the same time that the icon of girl was a sexual object, it was also simultaneously a vessel of conscious and unconscious self-projection. If one side is the more readily graspable desire of objectification and possession – I want to love a cute girl character / to hold her / to violate her / to abuse her – then the other side is the hidden desire of identification – I want to become a cute girl / to be loved / to be held / to be violated / to be abused. [...] [T]he desire to assimilate with the girl character is an extension of the desire to possess her."
  168. Ueno, Chizuko (1989). "Rorikon to yaoi-zoku ni mirai wa aru ka!? 90-nendai no sekkusu reboryūshon" [Do Have Lolicon and Yaoi Fans a Future Still!? The Sex Revolution of the 90s]. In Ishi'i, Shinji (ed.). Otaku no hon [The Book of Otaku] (in Japanese). Tokyo: JICC Shuppankyoku. pp. 131–136 [134]. ISBN 978-4-796-69104-8, cited in Galbraith 2019, p. 65.
  169. Itō, Kimio (1992). "Cultural Change and Gender Identity Trends in the 1970s and 1980s". International Journal of Japanese Sociology. 1 (1): 79–98 [95]. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6781.1992.tb00008.x.
  170. Kinsella 2000, p. 124.
  171. Naitō, Chizuko (2010). Translated by Shockey, Nathan. "Reorganizations of Gender and Nationalism: Gender Bashing and Loliconized Japanese Society". Mechademia. 5: 325–333 [328].
  172. Yano, Christine Reiko (2013). Pink Globalization: Hello Kitty's Trek Across the Pacific. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press. p. 49. OCLC 813540813.
  173. Galbraith 2019, p. 98.
  174. Galbraith 2019, pp. 94–107.
  175. Galbraith 2019, pp. 101–102.

Works cited

Further reading
  • Media related to Lolicon at Wikimedia Commons
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.