Mahler volume

A convex body in Euclidean space is defined as a compact convex set with non-empty interior. If ${\displaystyle B}$ is a centrally symmetric convex body in ${\displaystyle n}$-dimensional Euclidean space, the polar body ${\displaystyle B^{\circ }}$ is another centrally symmetric body in the same space, defined as the set

$${\displaystyle \left\{x\mid x\cdot y\leq 1{\text{ for all }}y\in B\right\}.}$$

The Mahler volume of ${\displaystyle B}$ is the product of the volumes of ${\displaystyle B}$ and ${\displaystyle B^{\circ }}$.[1]

If ${\displaystyle T}$ is an invertible linear transformation, then ${\displaystyle (TB)^{\circ }=(T^{-1})^{\ast }B^{\circ }}$. Applying ${\displaystyle T}$ to ${\displaystyle B}$ multiplies its volume by ${\displaystyle \det T}$ and multiplies the volume of ${\displaystyle B^{\circ }}$ by ${\displaystyle \det(T^{-1})^{\ast }}$. As these determinants are multiplicative inverses, the overall Mahler volume of ${\displaystyle B}$ is preserved by linear transformations.

The polar body of an ${\displaystyle n}$-dimensional unit sphere is itself another unit sphere. Thus, its Mahler volume is just the square of its volume,

${\displaystyle {\frac {\Gamma (3/2)^{2n}4^{n}}{\Gamma ({\frac {n}{2}}+1)^{2}}}}$

where ${\displaystyle \Gamma }$ is the Gamma function. By affine invariance, any ellipsoid has the same Mahler volume.[1]

The polar body of a polyhedron or polytope is its dual polyhedron or dual polytope. In particular, the polar body of a cube or hypercube is an octahedron or cross polytope. Its Mahler volume can be calculated as[1]

${\displaystyle {\frac {4^{n}}{\Gamma (n+1)}}.}$

The Mahler volume of the sphere is larger than the Mahler volume of the hypercube by a factor of approximately ${\displaystyle \left({\tfrac {\pi }{2}}\right)^{n}}$.[1]

The Blaschke–Santaló inequality states that the shapes with maximum Mahler volume are the spheres and ellipsoids. The three-dimensional case of this result was proven by Wilhelm Blaschke; the full result was proven much later by Luis Santaló (1949) using a technique known as Steiner symmetrization by which any centrally symmetric convex body can be replaced with a more sphere-like body without decreasing its Mahler volume.[1]

The shapes with the minimum known Mahler volume are hypercubes, cross polytopes, and more generally the Hanner polytopes which include these two types of shapes, as well as their affine transformations. The Mahler conjecture states that the Mahler volume of these shapes is the smallest of any n-dimensional symmetric convex body; it remains unsolved when ${\displaystyle n\geq 4}$. As Terry Tao writes:[1]

The main reason why this conjecture is so difficult is that unlike the upper bound, in which there is essentially only one extremiser up to affine transformations (namely the ball), there are many distinct extremisers for the lower bound - not only the cube and the octahedron, but also products of cubes and octahedra, polar bodies of products of cubes and octahedra, products of polar bodies of… well, you get the idea. It is really difficult to conceive of any sort of flow or optimisation procedure which would converge to exactly these bodies and no others; a radically different type of argument might be needed.

Bourgain & Milman (1987) prove that the Mahler volume is bounded below by ${\displaystyle c^{n}}$ times the volume of a sphere for some absolute constant ${\displaystyle c>0}$, matching the scaling behavior of the hypercube volume but with a smaller constant. Kuperberg (2008) proves that, more concretely, one can take ${\displaystyle c={\tfrac {1}{2}}}$ in this bound. A result of this type is known as a reverse Santaló inequality.

• The 2-dimensional case of the Mahler conjecture has been solved by Mahler (1939) and the 3-dimensional case by Iriyeh & Shibata (2020).
• Nazarov et al. (2010) proved that the unit cube is a strict local minimizer for the Mahler volume in the class of origin-symmetric convex bodies endowed with the Banach–Mazur distance.

The Mahler volume can be defined in the same way, as the product of the volume and the polar volume, for convex bodies whose interior contains the origin regardless of symmetry. Mahler conjectured that, for this generalization, the minimum volume is obtained by a simplex, with its centroid at the origin. As with the symmetric Mahler conjecture, reverse Santaló inequalities are known showing that the minimum volume is at least within an exponential factor of the simplex.[2]

• Bourgain, Jean; Milman, Vitali D. (1987). "New volume ratio properties for convex symmetric bodies in ${\displaystyle \mathbb {R} ^{n}}$". Inventiones Mathematicae. 88 (2): 319–340. doi:10.1007/BF01388911. MR 0880954.
• Iriyeh, Hiroshi; Shibata, Masataka (2020). "Symmetric Mahler's conjecture for the volume product in the 3-dimensional case". Duke Mathematical Journal. 169 (6): 1077–1134. arXiv:1706.01749. doi:10.1215/00127094-2019-0072. MR 4085078.
• Kuperberg, Greg (2008). "From the Mahler conjecture to Gauss linking integrals". Geometric and Functional Analysis. 18 (3): 870–892. arXiv:math/0610904. doi:10.1007/s00039-008-0669-4. MR 2438998.
• Mahler, Kurt (1939). "Ein Minimalproblem für konvexe Polygone". Mathematica (Zutphen) B: 118–127.
• Nazarov, Fedor; Petrov, Fedor; Ryabogin, Dmitry; Zvavitch, Artem (2010). "A remark on the Mahler conjecture: local minimality of the unit cube". Duke Mathematical Journal. 154 (3): 419–430. arXiv:0905.0867. doi:10.1215/00127094-2010-042. MR 2730574.
• Santaló, Luis A. (1949). "An affine invariant for convex bodies of ${\displaystyle n}$-dimensional space". Portugaliae Mathematica (in Spanish). 8: 155–161. MR 0039293.
• Tao, Terence (March 8, 2007). "Open question: the Mahler conjecture on convex bodies". Revised and reprinted in Tao, Terence (2009). "3.8 Mahler's conjecture for convex bodies". Structure and Randomness: Pages from Year One of a Mathematical Blog. American Mathematical Society. pp. 216–219. ISBN 978-0-8218-4695-7.