National Democratic Party of Germany

The Homeland (German: Die Heimat), previously known as the National Democratic Party of Germany (NPD; German: Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands), is a far-right[13] Neo-Nazi[14] and ultranationalist[8] political party in Germany.

The Homeland
Die Heimat
Party ChairmanFrank Franz[1]
Founder
Founded28 November 1964 (1964-11-28)
Merger ofDeutsche Reichspartei[2][3]
DNVP (1962)[4]
HeadquartersCarl-Arthur-Bühring-Haus, Seelenbinderstrasse 42,
12555 Berlin
NewspaperDeutsche Stimme
Youth wingJunge Nationalisten[5]
MembershipDecrease 3,000 (2022 est.)[6]
IdeologyNeo-Nazism[7]
German ultranationalism[8]
Political positionFar-right[9][10][11]
European affiliationAlliance for Peace and Freedom
European Parliament groupNon-Inscrits
Colours  Black   White   Red
  Brown (customary)[12]
SloganDie soziale Heimatpartei
(The Social Homeland Party)
Bundestag
0 / 736
Bundesrat
0 / 69
State Parliaments
0 / 1,897
European Parliament
0 / 96
Heads of State Governments
0 / 16
Website
die-heimat.de

The party was founded in 1964 as successor to the German Reich Party (German: Deutsche Reichspartei, DRP). Party statements also self-identify the party as Germany's "only significant patriotic force".[15] On 1 January 2011, the nationalist German People's Union merged with the NPD and the party name of the National Democratic Party of Germany was extended by the addition of "The People's Union".[16]

As a neo-Nazi organization[17][18][19][20][21] it has been referred to as "the most significant neo-Nazi party to emerge after 1945".[22] The German Federal Agency for Civic Education, or BPB, has criticized the NPD for working with members of organizations which were later found unconstitutional by the federal courts and disbanded,[23][24] while the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV), Germany's domestic security agency, classifies The Homeland as a "threat to the constitutional order" because of its platform and ideology, and it is under their observation.[25] An effort to outlaw the party failed in 2003, because the government had many informers and agents in the party, some in high position, who had written part of the material used against them.[26] Since its founding in 1964, The Homeland has never managed to win enough votes on the federal level to cross Germany's 5% minimum threshold for representation in the Bundestag; it has succeeded in crossing the 5% threshold and gaining representation in state parliaments 11 times, including one-convocation entry to seven West German state parliaments between November 1966 and April 1968 and two-convocation electoral success in two East German states of Saxony and Mecklenburg-Vorpommern between 2004 and 2011.[27] Since 2016, The Homeland has not been represented in state parliaments. Udo Voigt led The Homeland from 1996 to 2011.[25] He was succeeded by Holger Apfel,[28] who in turn was replaced by Udo Pastörs in December 2013. In November 2014, Pastörs was ousted and Frank Franz became the party's leader. Voigt was elected the party's first Member of the European Parliament in 2014. The party lost the seat in the 2019 European Parliament election. In June 2023, the party renamed itself to Die Heimat after a party vote.[29][30]

History

Early history

NPD logo until the end of 2010

In the 1950s, despite the overall failure of de-Nazification, early right-wing extremist parties in West Germany failed to attract voters away from the moderate government that had presided over Germany's recovery.[31] In November 1964, however, right-wing splinter groups united to form the NPD.[32] One of the four founding members was Adolf von Thadden, who entered politics as a member of the German Right Party and Deutsche Reichspartei before joining The Homeland and serving as its chairman from 1967 to 1971. Owing to von Thadden's effective leadership The Homeland achieved success in the late 1960s, winning local government seats across West Germany. In 1966[33] and 1967, fuelled by West German discontent with a lagging economy and with the leadership of Chancellor Ludwig Erhard,[32] The Homeland won 15 seats in Bavaria, 10 in lower Saxony, 8 in Hesse, and several other seats. However, The Homeland did not then and has never since received the minimum 5% of votes in federal elections that allow a party to send delegates to the German Parliament. The Homeland came closest to that goal in the 1969 election, when it received 4.3 percent of the vote.[34] Helping pave the way for these NPD gains were an economic downturn, frustrations with the emerging leftist youth counter-culture, and the emergence of a tripartite coalition government among the center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU), the Christian Social Union (the CDU's present-day sister party), and the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD). The coalition government had created a vacuum in the traditional political right wing, which The Homeland tried to fill.[33] Additionally, the party benefited from hostility to the growing immigrant population and fears that the government would repudiate claims to the "lost territories" (pre-World War II German territory east of the Oder-Neisse River.)[35] The historian Walter Laqueur has argued that The Homeland in the 1960s cannot be classified as a neo-Nazi party.[36]

Yet, when the coalition fell apart, around 75 percent of those who had voted for The Homeland drifted back to the center-right. During the 1970s, The Homeland went into decline, suffering from an internal split over failing to get into the German Parliament. The issue of immigration spurred a small rebound in popular interest from the mid-1980s to the early 1990s, but the party only saw limited success in various local elections.[33]

Recent history

In September 2019, The Homeland politician Stefan Jagsch was elected as representative of Altenstadt-Waldsiedlung. The unanimous election of The Homeland politician by the local council led to irritation and horror in other parties, such as Angela Merkel's Christian Democratic Union (CDU), the center-left Social Democrats (SPD), and the liberal Free Democratic Party (FDP), whose local council members had voted for Jagsch.[37][38]

Electoral history

Since its founding in 1964, The Homeland has only won seats in regional assemblies. Its successes in state parliaments can be grouped into two periods: the late 1960s (1966 in Hesse; 1967 in Bremen, Lower Saxony, Rhineland-Palatinate, and Schleswig-Holstein; and 1968 in Baden-Württemberg and Bavaria), and former East Germany since reunification (2006 and 2011 in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, 2004 and 2009 in Saxony).[27]

In the 2004 state election in Saxony, The Homeland won 9.2% of the overall vote. After the 2009 state election in Saxony, The Homeland sent eight representatives to the Saxony state parliament, having lost four representatives since the 2004 election. The Homeland lost their representation in Saxony at the 2014 state election. They also lost all representation in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern at the 2016 state election.

The Homeland maintained a non-competition agreement with the German People's Union (DVU) between 2004 and 2009. The third nationalist-oriented party, the Republicans (REP), has so far refused to join this agreement. However, Kerstin Lorenz, a local representative of the Republicans in Saxony, sabotaged her party's registration to help The Homeland in the Saxony election.[39]

In the 2005 federal elections, The Homeland received 1.6 per cent of the vote nationally. It garnered the highest per cent of votes in the states of Saxony (4.9 per cent), Thuringia (3.7 per cent), Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (3.5 per cent) and Brandenburg (3.2 per cent). In most other states, the party won around 1 percent of the total votes cast. In the 2006 Mecklenburg-Vorpommern state election, The Homeland received 7.3% of the vote and thus achieved state representation there, as well.[40]

The Homeland had 5,300 registered party members in 2004.[41] Over the course of 2006, The Homeland processed roughly 2,000 party applications to push the membership total over 7,200. In 2008, the trend of a growing number of members has been reversed and the party's membership is estimated at 7,000.[42]

In the 2014 European elections, Udo Voigt was elected as the party's first Member of the European Parliament.[43]

2001–2003 banning attempt

In 2001, the federal government, the Bundestag, and the Bundesrat jointly attempted to have the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany ban The Homeland. The court, the highest court in Germany, has the exclusive power to ban parties if they are found to be "anti-constitutional" through the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany. However, the petition was rejected in 2003 after it was discovered that a number of the Homeland's inner circle, including as many as 30 of its top 200 leaders were undercover agents or informants of the German secret services, like the federal Bundesamt für Verfassungsschutz. They include a former deputy chairman of the party and author of an anti-Semitic tract that formed a central part of the government's case. Since the secret services were unwilling to fully disclose their agents' identities and activities, the court found it impossible to decide which moves by the party were based on genuine party decisions and which were controlled by the secret services in an attempt to further the ban. The court determined that so many of the party's actions were influenced by the government that the resulting "lack of clarity" made it impossible to defend a ban. "The presence of the state at the leadership level makes influence on its aims and activities unavoidable," it concluded.[44]

Horst Mahler (The Homeland), a former member of the far-left terrorist organisation Red Army Faction, defended The Homeland before the court. In May 2009, several state politicians published an extensive document[45] which they claim proves the Homeland's opposition to the constitution without relying on information supplied by undercover agents. This move was intended to lead up to a second attempt to have The Homeland banned.

Merger with DVU

Logo of the NPD after its merger with the DVU until 2013

At the 2010 NPD party conference at Bamberg it was announced that the party would ask its members to approve a merger with the German People's Union (DVU).[46] After the merger on 1 January 2011, the combined party briefly used the name NPD – Die Volksunion (NPD - The People's Union).[16] Between 2004 and 2009 the two parties had agreed not to compete against each other in elections. However, on 27 January 2011, Munich's Landgericht (regional court) in a preliminary injunction declared the merger null and void.[47]

The Green Movement

The Homeland has recently supported the green movement. This is one of many strategies the party has used to try to gain supporters. Historically the opposing party the German Greens have fully supported the green movement in Germany.[48] The German Greens group was a successful European ecological group that began in 1980. Kate Connolly who is a correspondent for The Guardian wrote the article: German far-right extremists tap into green movement for support. In the article Connolly explains the opposition between these two political groups pertaining to the green movement.[48] The Artaman league is essential in understanding the green movements history. This was a farming movement that was inspired by the "blood and soil" ruralist ideology adopted from the Nazis.[48] This farming movement affected the Mecklenburg region of Germany during the 19th century. Settlers at this time took advantage of the cheap cost of land in these rural communities. These settlers were in support of the Artaman league and continued to reinforce the ideology.[48]

The NDP's plans are to take the ecological movement back from the German Greens group. Connolly spoke to different farmers, organizations, and employees of the government to represent the different perspectives of the ecological movement.[48] Hans-Gunter Laimer a farmer who ran for election for The Homeland mentions his frustration that the German Greens groups has dominated the organic farming market for too long. He has also been linked to other German groups specifically Umwelt and Aktiv. Both political parties are concerned with the ways they are in opposition to one another.[48] The Homeland supporters of the green movement are in favour of local produce. However, they are against GMOS, pesticides, and intensive livestock.[48] Organisations involved in the farming industry have lost consumers because they are not able to state what the political views of the farmers products are to the consumer. For example, BioPark is an organic cultivation organisation with a vetting process to certify organic farmers. The vetting process is strictly based on cultivation methods and not on political affiliations. BioPark has lost costumers because left-leaning supporters worry buying local organic produce is supporting the far-right extremist.[48]

The department of rural enlightenment has supported the importance of distinguishing between these two political parties. The department created a brochure called "Nature Conservation Versus Right-wing Extremist".[48] The brochure was created in order to help consumers distinguish from the far-right extremists. Other representatives from the government have spoken on this divide. For example, Connolly mentions a representative of the Centre for Democratic culture in Mecklenburg who chose to stay anonymous in order to protect themself.[48] The representative stated the goal of the NDP is to build bridges between citizens. The NDP is strategic in the way they are going about this in a subtle quite manner. The result the NDP is trying to achieve is to reinforce the division between the two political parties for when NDP no longer becomes associated with politics.[48]

World War II and Holocaust commemoration controversies

Supporters of the NPD and other protesters in Dresden, 2009

In 2005, the Landtag of Saxony held a minute of silence for the victims of Nazi Germany. Holger Apfel, leader of The Homeland in Saxony and deputy leader of the party nationwide, boycotted the remembrance along with 11 other NPD politicians and staged a walkout from the Landtag chamber. He also gave a speech in which he demanded a moment of silence be held for the victims of the bombing of Dresden in 1945 and called the Allies of World War II "mass murderers", stating that "Today we in this parliament are taking up the political battle for historical truth, and against the servitude of guilt of the German people... The causes of the holocaust bombing of Dresden have nothing to do with either September 1 1939 or with January 30 1933." Apfel's speech caused politicians from other parties in the Landtag to walk out in protest.[49]

Udo Voigt voiced his support for Apfel's and reiterated the statement, which some controversially claimed was a violation of the German law which forbids Holocaust denial. However, after a judicial review, it was decided that Voigt's description of the Allied bombing of Dresden as a "holocaust" was an exercise of free speech and "defamation of the dead" was not the purpose of his statement.[50]

In 2009, The Homeland joined the Junge Landsmannschaft Ostdeutschland in a demonstration on the anniversary of the bombing of Dresden in World War II. Roughly 6,000 people came to participate in the event.[51][52]

Activism and controversy

A 2007 Union of Persecutees of the Nazi Regime demonstration at the Reichstag calling for The Homeland to be banned. The banner reads "Auschwitz gedenkt" ("Remember Auschwitz").

The NPD's strategy has been to create "nationally liberated zones" and circumvent its marginal electoral status by concentrating on regions where support is strongest. In March 2006, musician Konstantin Wecker tried to set up an in-school anti-fascist concert in Halberstadt, Saxony-Anhalt two weeks before the state elections. The Homeland argued that because of politics, the date and the in-school venue, the concert "was an unacceptable form of political campaigning."[53] In protest, The Homeland vowed to buy the tickets and turn up en masse at Wecker's show, which led local authorities to cancel the event. The Social Democrats and the Greens were outraged by the decision, which the Central Council of Jews in Germany criticized as "politically bankrupt".

The Homeland was going to sponsor a march through Leipzig on 21 June 2006, as the 2006 World Cup was going on. The party wanted to show its support for the Iranian national football team, which was playing in Leipzig, and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. However, The Homeland decided against the demonstration; only a counter-demonstration took place that day, in support of Israel.[54] During the World Cup, the party's web site stated that due to the prevalence of people of non-German descent on the Germany national football team, the team "was not really German".

Later in 2006, the party designed leaflets, which said "White – not just the color of a jersey! For a true National team!"[55] This leaflet was never mass-distributed, but copies were confiscated during a raid on the NPD's headquarters, when authorities had been hoping to find material linking the party to Nazism. Patrick Owomoyela was later informed about the poster after it was noted that the image depicted a footballer wearing a white jersey with Owomoyela's number on it. Owomoyela, of Nigerian descent, had played for the Germany national team in the years before the World Cup and proceeded to file a lawsuit against the party. The party was able to delay the procedures but in April 2009 three party officials (Udo Voigt, Frank Schwerdt and Klaus Beier) were sentenced for Volksverhetzung (Voigt and Beier to 7 months on probation, Schwerdt to 10 months on probation).[56]

In November 2008, shortly after the 2008 United States presidential election, The Homeland published a document entitled "Africa conquers the White House" which stated that the election of Barack Obama as the first African-American President of the United States was the result of "the American alliance of Jews and Negroes" and that Obama aimed to destroy the United States' "white identity". The Homeland claimed, "A non-white America is a declaration of war on all people who believe an organically grown social order based on language and culture, history and heritage to be the essence of humanity" and "Barack Obama hides this declaration of war behind his pushy sunshine smile." The Homeland also stated that the extensive support for Obama in Germany "resembles an African tropical disease."[57][58][59]

In September 2009, another incident involving The Homeland and a football player of the Germany national team was reported. In a television show of a regional channel, NPD spokesman Beier called midfielder Mesut Özil a "Plaste-Deutscher" ("Plastic German" or "ID Card German"), meaning someone who is not born German, but becomes German by naturalisation, particularly for certain benefits. The German Football Association announced that they would immediately file a lawsuit against The Homeland and their spokesman, if requested by Özil.[60]

During the Gaza War in 2009, The Homeland planned a "Holocaust" vigil for Gaza in support of the Palestinians. Charlotte Knobloch, the head of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, said "joint hatred of everything Jewish is unifying neo-Nazis and Islamists." Knobloch claimed German-Palestinian protestors "unashamedly admitted" that they would vote for The Homeland during the next election.[61]

In 2009, The Homeland hung anti-Polish posters with slogan "Polen-Invasion Stoppen" ("Stop the Polish invasion") in Dresden and Görlitz. Mayor of Görlitz and then Chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel, condemned the posters.[62][63]

In April 2009, the party was fined 2.5 million euros for filing incorrect financial statements, resulting, according to German broadcaster Deutsche Welle, in "serious financial trouble" for its administration.[64]

On 23 September 2009, four days before the federal elections, German police raided the Berlin headquarters of The Homeland to investigate claims that letters sent from The Homeland to politicians from immigrant backgrounds incited racial hatred. The Homeland leader in Berlin defended the letters saying that "As part of a democracy, we're entitled to say if something doesn't suit us in this country."[65][66][67][68]

2011 banning attempt

In 2011, authorities were reportedly trying to link the party, and specifically 30-year-old national organization director Patrick Wieschke, to the so-called "Zwickau terrorist cell". This raised the possibility of another effort to outlaw the party. The cell had been implicated in a string of murders and the November robbery of a savings bank in Eisenach. Authorities were also pursuing a gun case against Ralf Wohlleben, former deputy chairman of the party's branch in Thuringia, though the latter case was reportedly unlikely to translate into a national-level challenge to the party's legal standing.[69] The likelihood of success of renewed banning attempts has been questioned, given the Office for the Protection of the Constitution has over 130 informants in the party, some in high positions, raising the question of whether the party is effectively controlled by the government.[70]

2012 Thor Steinar clothing controversy

In June 2012, several NPD members of Saxony's parliament attended the parliament's sittings wearing clothing from Thor Steinar, a clothing brand that is popular amongst neo-Nazis; the legislature responded by saying that such provocative clothing was not permitted to be worn in the parliament and demanded that The Homeland's members remove and replace their attire; The Homeland's members refused, resulting in the members being expelled from the parliament and banned from attending the next three parliamentary sittings.[71] The Homeland members denied accusations that they wore the shirts as a deliberate provocation.[71]

2012 banning attempt

German officials tried to outlaw the party again in December 2012, with the interior ministers of all 16 states recommending a ban. The Federal Constitutional Court is yet to vote on the recommendation.[72] In March 2013 the Merkel government said it would not try to ban the NPD.[73]

2016 banning attempt

German officials again tried to outlaw The Homeland by submitting a request to the Federal Constitutional Court in 2016.[74]

On 17 January 2017, the second senate of the Federal Constitutional Court rejected the attempt to outlaw the party. The reasoning behind the decision was that the NPD's political significance is virtually nonexistent at both the state and federal levels and that as such, the party had no chance of posing a significant threat to the constitutional order. It was also reasoned that outlawing the party would not change the mindset and political ideology of its members and supporters, who in the event of a ban could simply form a new movement under a different name. However, the Court also openly acknowledged that NPD is unconstitutional based on its manifesto and ideology, citing "links to neo-Nazism" and that "anti-semitism was a structural element of the party ideology" in its reasoning.[75] The Court also indirectly suggested that state grants or other financial contributions should not be given to such parties to further their unconstitutional cause.[75] This prompted calls by the public for the proposal of a constitutional amendment which would forbid unconstitutional parties' financing to the Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany. The proposal was criticised by the interior policy spokesman of Die Linke,[76] who claimed that such a constitutional amendment could stand to serve as a politically dubious way to remove a political opponent. Law Professor Hans Herbert von Arnim defended the rights of small parties, including the NPD.[76]

Logo of the NPD 2013–2023

2023 renaming to Die Heimat

The party renamed itself to Die Heimat ("The Homeland") at the party congress in Riesa in early June 2023. 77% voted in favor of the name change.[29]

Platform and ideology

Udo Voigt, former leader of the NPD, standing in front of a banner depicting Nazi leader Rudolf Hess. Hess, who died in prison in 1987, is considered a martyr by the NPD,[77] and the party attempted to nominate him for a Nobel Peace Prize in 2007.[78]

The Homeland is a neo-Nazi political party.[14] It calls itself a party of "grandparents and grandchildren" because the 1960s generation in Germany, known for the leftist student movement, strongly opposes the NPD's policies. The NPD's economic program promotes social security for Germans and control against plutocracy. They discredit and reject the "liberal-capitalist system".[79]

The Homeland argues that NATO fails to represent the interests and needs of European people. The party considers the European Union to be little more than a reorganisation of a Soviet-style government of Europe along financial lines.[80] Although highly critical of the EU, as long as Germany remains a part of it, The Homeland opposes Turkey's incorporation into the organisation. Voigt envisions future collaboration and continued friendly relations with other nationalists and European nationalist parties. The Homeland is strongly anti-Zionist, frequently criticizing the policies and activities of Israel.[81]

The Homeland's platform asserts that Germany is larger than the present-day Federal Republic, and calls for a return of German territory lost after World War II, a foreign policy position abandoned by the German government in 1990.[82]

In the early 21st century, long-standing efforts to ban the party were renewed.[32] The 2005 report of the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution contains the following description:

The party continues to pursue a "people's front" of the nationalists [consisting of] the NPD, DVU, and forces not attached to any party, which is supposed to develop into a base for an encompassing 'German people's movement'. The aggressive agitation of The Homeland unabashedly aims towards the abolition of parliamentary democracy and the democratic constitutional state, although the use of violence is currently still officially rejected for tactical reasons. Statements of The Homeland document an essential affinity with Nazism; its agitation is racist, antisemitic, homophobic, revisionist, and intends to disparage the democratic and lawful order of the constitution.[83]

Holger Apfel, NPD leader from 2011 to 2013

International connections

Voigt has held meetings with various proponents of white nationalism, including David Duke, a US white nationalist, author, politician, and activist.[84] Between 1989 and 1992, the International Third Position began to ally itself with The Homeland in Germany and Forza Nuova in Italy.[85]

They have been in contact with Youth Defence, the Irish anti-abortion group, since 1996.[86] Justin Barrett, former leader of Youth Defence and current President of the National Party of Ireland, has spoken at their events in Passau in 2000.[87][88]

Udo Voigt and prominent American white nationalist David Duke

The Homeland has also links with the Romanian neo-Legionary group Noua Dreaptă.[89]

Connections with Croatian far right

The party also has connections with far-right parties and politicians in Croatia. In 2017, according to the claims of Dražen Keleminec, president of the marginal far-right Autochthonous Croatian Party of Rights (A-HSP), The Homeland party member Alexander Neidlein took part in the party's march to show their support and declare allegiance to then-recently elected American president Donald Trump. During the march, the party's members, dressed in black uniforms, were waving flags of The Homeland and the United States while shouting the Ustasha salute "Za dom spremni". The following day, the U.S. embassy in Zagreb reacted by publishing a statement in which they strongly condemned the march and rejected any attempts to connect the United States with Ustasha ideology.[90]

In 2018, Croatian far-right MP Željko Glasnović took part in the party congress in the town of Büdingen, expressing his support for them.[17]

Youth wing

Logo of the youth wing since 2018

Junge Nationalisten (short: JN; until 13 January 2018 Junge Nationaldemokraten) is the official youth organization of the right-wing extremist party founded in 1967. According to The Homeland's statutes, the JN are an "integral part" of the party.[5]

The JN are committed to the basic program of the Heimat, but represent these points of view much more aggressively, which is evident both during demonstrations and in political style. They are observed by the Office for the Protection of the Constitution and classified as right-wing extremists. Their regular publication is called The Activist.[91] In this central organ, under the heading "The Federal Leader Has the Word", they describe themselves as "representatives of the national revolutionary wing within the NPD". The youth organization criticizes those in The Homeland who have made the "fight for parliaments" the "most important goal". Instead, "resistance and criticism are appropriate, since these developments run the risk of gradual adjustment and bourgeoisie".[92] The JN describe themselves as anti-imperialist. Among other things, they call for the withdrawal of German troops from Afghanistan,[93] describe Israel as the "enemy of all peoples", and refer to it as becoming a parasitic state.[94]

The JN maintains active contacts with a network of neo-Nazi organizations across Europe, like the Nordic Resistance Movement whose Finnish independence day march it has attended, along with National Corps of Ukraine, Bulgarian National Union, Serbian Action and others.[95][96]

Groups within the party

Heimat runs an own "security service" ("Ordungsdienst"). The group is led by the neo-nazi from Lueneburg Manfred Börm.[97]

Chairmen of The Homeland

Election results and current representation

Federal Parliament (Bundestag)

Election year Constituency Party list Seats won
Votes  % +/– Votes  % +/–
1965 587,216 1.8 Increase 1.8 664,193 2.0 Increase 2.0
0 / 518
1969 1,189,375 3.6 Increase 1.8 1,422,010 4.3 Increase 2.3
0 / 518
1972 194,389 0.5 Decrease 3.1 207,465 0.6 Decrease 3.7
0 / 518
1976 136,023 0.4 Decrease 0.1 122,661 0.3 Decrease 0.3
0 / 518
1980 68,096 0.2 Decrease 0.1
0 / 497
1983 57,112 0.1 Decrease 0.3 91,095 0.2 Steady 0.0
0 / 498
1987 182,880 0.5 Increase 0.4 227,054 0.6 Increase 0.4
0 / 497
1990 190,105 0.4 Decrease 0.1 145,776 0.3 Decrease 0.3
0 / 662
1998 45,043 0.1 Decrease 0.3 126,571 0.3 Steady 0.0
0 / 669
2002 103,209 0.2 Increase 0.1 215,232 0.4 Increase 0.1
0 / 603
2005 857,777 1.8 Increase 1.6 748,568 1.6 Increase 1.2
0 / 614
2009 768,442 1.8 Steady 0.0 635,525 1.5 Decrease 0.1
0 / 620
2013 634,842 1.5 Decrease 0.3 560,828 1.3 Decrease 0.2
0 / 630
2017 45,239 0.1 Decrease 1.4 176,715 0.4 Decrease 0.9
0 / 709
2021 1,089 0.0 Decrease 0.1 64,608 0.1 Decrease 0.3
0 / 709

European Parliament

Election year # of
overall votes
 % of
overall vote
# of
overall seats won
+/–
1979 - - - -
1984 198,633 0.8
0 / 81
Increase 0.8
1989 - - - -
1994 77,227 0.2
0 / 99
Increase 0.2
1999 107,662 0.4
0 / 99
Increase 0.2
2004 241,743 0.9
0 / 99
Increase 0.5
2009 - - - -
2014[98] 301,139 1.0
1 / 99
Increase 1.0
2019[98] 101,323 0.3
0 / 99
Decrease 0.7

Literature

  • Ackermann, Robert: Warum die NPD keinen Erfolg haben kann – Organisation, Programm und Kommunikation einer rechtsextremen Partei. Budrich, Opladen 2012, ISBN 978-3-86388-012-5.
  • Brandstetter, Marc: Die „neue“ NPD: Zwischen Systemfeindschaft und bürgerlicher Fassade. Parteienmonitor Aktuell der Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung. Bonn 2012 (online)
  • Brandstetter, Marc: Die NPD unter Udo Voigt. Organisation. Ideologie. Strategie (= Extremismus und Demokratie. Bd. 25). Nomos Verlag, Baden-Baden 2013, ISBN 978-3-383-29708-3.
  • Prasse, Jan-Ole: Der kurze Höhenflug der NPD. Rechtsextreme Wahlerfolge in den 1960er Jahren. Tectum-Verlag, Marburg 2010, ISBN 978-3-8288-2282-5.
  • Philippsberg, Robert: Die Strategie der NPD: Regionale Umsetzung in Ost- und Westdeutschland. Baden-Baden 2009.
  • apabiz e. V.: Die NPD – Eine Handreichung zu Programm, Struktur, Personal und Hintergründen. Zweite, aktualisierte Auflage. 2008. (online) (PDF; 671 kB)

See also

References

  1. Höhne, Valerie (25 April 2017). "Niedergang der NPD: Ein lächerlicher Verein". Der Spiegel. Retrieved 3 April 2018.
  2. Luciano Cheles, Ronnie Ferguson & Michalina Vaughan, Neo-Fascism in Europe, Longman, 1991, p. 71
  3. Horst W. Schmollinger, Richard Stöss, Die Parteien und die Presse der Parteien und Gewerkschaften in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1945–1974, Westdeutscher Verlag 1975, S. 187
  4. Stöss, Richard (1989). Die extreme Rechte in der Bundesrepublik: Entwicklung – Ursachen – Gegenmaßnahmen. Westdeutscher Verlag. p. 126
  5. "Nationaldemokratische Partei Deutschlands" (PDF). 16 June 2011. Archived from the original (PDF) on 16 June 2011. Retrieved 29 September 2021.
  6. https://www.verfassungsschutz.de/SharedDocs/publikationen/EN/reports-on-the-protection-of-the-constitution/2023-06-brief-summary-2022-report-on-the-protection-of-the-constitution.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=4
  7. Pikulicka-Wilczewska, Agnieszka (21 April 2018). "German town on alert as neo-Nazi festival, counter events held". Al Jazeera. Retrieved 31 October 2021.
  8. "European Court Could Thwart Bid to Ban Alt-Right Party". SPIEGEL ONLINE. 14 May 2012. Archived from the original on 1 August 2019. Retrieved 11 August 2019.
  9. "German far-right NPD threatens vigilante patrols". BBC News. 4 January 2019. Retrieved 11 August 2019.
  10. Berg, Nate (14 May 2019). "Germany's 'joke' party wants seat at EU table". POLITICO (Europe edition).
  11. "tagesschau.de". tagesschau.de.
  12. Caiani, Manuela; della Porta, Donatella; Wagemann, Claudius (16 February 2012). Mobilizing on the Extreme Right: Germany, Italy, and the United States. OUP Oxford. p. 194. ISBN 978-0-19-964126-0.
  13. Schori Liang, Christina (2013). "'Nationalism Ensures Peaces': the Foreign and Security Policy of the German Populist Radical Left After Reunification". In Christina Schori Liang (ed.). Europe for the Europeans: The Foreign and Security Policy of the Populist Radical Right. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. p. 139. ISBN 978-1-4094-9825-4. Archived from the original on 15 May 2019. Retrieved 17 March 2016.
  14. "NPD – einzige ernstzunehmende nationale Kraft!". npd.de. 28 September 2009. Archived from the original on 22 November 2012. Retrieved 14 February 2012.
  15. "NPD – Start". Npd.de. Archived from the original on 25 November 2010. Retrieved 15 January 2015.
  16. "Neo-Nazi NPD party takes hold in municipal vote in Saxony". thelocal.de/. 9 June 2008. Archived from the original on 28 September 2013. Retrieved 10 June 2009.
  17. "Neo-Nazis push into town councils". thelocal.de. 9 June 2009. Archived from the original on 28 September 2013. Retrieved 9 June 2009. The neo-Nazi NPD party is entering several German city parliaments for the first time after this weekend's local elections, news magazine Der Spiegel reported on Monday.
  18. "Neonazis in der NPD auf dem Vormarsch". Süddeutsche Zeitung. 19 May 2009. Archived from the original on 18 December 2009. Retrieved 23 August 2009. Das neonazistische Spektrum hat seinen Einfluss innerhalb der NPD ausgebaut.
  19. "Poll shows majority of Germany believe NPD to be non-democratic and damaging to Germany's image". Der Spiegel. 22 September 2006. Retrieved 21 July 2009.
  20. Peter Davies, Derek Lynch, The Routledge companion to fascism and the far right Archived 28 April 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Psychology Press, 2002, pg. 315
  21. "Rechtsextremismus". Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung. 2006. Archived from the original on 22 February 2012. Retrieved 15 October 2015. Auch zeigte sich die NPD nun bereit, mit radikalen Kräften aus dem parteiungebundenen Spektrum zusammenzuarbeiten. Formal gilt nach wie vor ein Unvereinbarkeitsbeschluss der NPD-Mitgliedschaft mit der Mitgliedschaft in verbotenen Gruppierungen. Faktisch jedoch setzt sich die NPD mit ihrer Strategie bewusst über die offizielle Verlautbarung hinweg. Die NPD wolle in Zukunft mit denjenigen zusammenzuarbeiten, die dazu bereit seien, "als politische Soldaten zu denken und zu handeln", so die neue Strategie.
  22. "Zusammenspiel zwischen NPD und Neonazis im niedersächsischen Landtagswahlkampf". Landesamt für Verfassungsschutz Bremen. 30 November 2007. Archived from the original on 2 October 2016. Retrieved 2 August 2009. Die Kooperation zwischen der NPD und den Freien Nationalisten (Angehörige von neonazistischen Kameradschaften) prägt das Auftreten der Partei im niedersächsischen Landtagswahlkampf. Bekannte Neonazis treten für die NPD als Direktkandidaten an, z.B. Dennis BÜHRIG in Bergen, Klaus HELLMUND in Celle, Mathias BEHRENS in Soltau oder Dieter RIEFLING in Hildesheim.
  23. Austrian 'neo-Nazi' joins NPD's executive committee Archived 31 May 2011 at the Wayback Machine. Austrian Times Archived 5 May 2009 at the Wayback Machine. Published 8 April 2009.
  24. "V-Mann-Affäre". FOCUS. Archived from the original on 14 October 2017. Retrieved 16 May 2017.
  25. Zicht, Wilko. "Wahlergebnisse" (in German). Wahlrecht.de. Retrieved 5 May 2014.
  26. Stabwechsel bei der NPD Archived 21 January 2012 at the Wayback Machine in: Blick nach rechts, accessed 14 11 2011
  27. "Rechtsextreme NPD heißt jetzt "Die Heimat"" [Right Wing NPD Now Named "Die Heimat"]. Spiegel (in German). 3 June 2023.
  28. https://www.bundeswahlleiterin.de/dam/jcr/477203a4-8602-497d-9311-89d9a7c7b78a/anschriftenverzeichnis_parteien.pdf
  29. Ignazi, Piero (2003). "Extreme Right Parties in Western Europe". Oxford University Press: 66. doi:10.1093/0198293259.001.0001. ISBN 9780198293255. Archived from the original on 27 March 2019. Retrieved 27 March 2019. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  30. "National Democratic Party of Germany (NPD)". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 17 November 2015. Retrieved 9 November 2015.
  31. Chapin, Wesley D. (1997). Germany for the Germans?. Greenwood Publishing Group. pp. 70–73. ISBN 0-313-30258-8.
  32. "Election Resources on the Internet: Elections to the German Bundestag - Results Lookup". electionresources.org. Archived from the original on 29 September 2017. Retrieved 5 November 2016.
  33. Carr, William (1991). A History of Germany: 1815-1990 (4th ed.). London, United Kingdom: Hodder & Stoughton. p. 383.
  34. Laqueur, Walter (1996). Fascism: past, present, future. Oxford University Press. p. 110. ISBN 978-0-19-509245-5. Retrieved 14 November 2011.
  35. Dikov, Ivan (7 September 2019). "Far-Right Politician's Election as Town Council Head Shocks Germany's Mainstream Parties". Archived from the original on 6 October 2019. Retrieved 9 September 2019.
  36. "Germany: Merkel party colleagues elect far-right extremist to local council". Deutsche Welle. 9 July 2019. Archived from the original on 9 September 2019. Retrieved 9 September 2019.
  37. Kerstin Lorenz, ehem. Landeschefin der Republikaner in Sachsen, tritt in die NPD ein! Archived from the original on 9 November 2004. (German)
  38. "Poll boost for German far right". BBC News. 18 September 2006. Retrieved 19 April 2012.
  39. Hochschild, Jennifer L.; Mollenkopf, John H. (2009). Bringing Outsiders in: Transatlantic Perspectives on Immigrant Political Incorporation. Cornell University Press. p. 147. ISBN 978-0-8014-7514-6.
  40. "Verfassungsschutzbericht 2008". Verfassungsschutz.de. May 2009. p. 79. Archived from the original on 24 February 2009. Retrieved 23 August 2009. Mit rund 7.000 Mitgliedern verzeichnete die NPD im Vergleich zum Vorjahr (7.200) einen leichten Rückgang, bleibt jedoch mitgliederstärkste Partei im rechtsextremistischen Spektrum.
  41. "Meet the new faces ready to sweep into the European parliament". The Guardian. 26 May 2014. Archived from the original on 27 February 2020. Retrieved 11 January 2015.
  42. Hooper, John (19 March 2003). "German court rejects attempt to ban neo-Nazi party". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 19 May 2010.
  43. Gensing, Patrick (5 April 2009). "Die NPD bekämpft aktiv die Verfassungsordnung". tagesschau.de (in German). Archived from the original on 7 May 2009. Retrieved 15 October 2015.
  44. "German neo-Nazi parties 'consider merger'". The Daily Telegraph. London. 4 June 2010. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022.
  45. Jansen, Frank (27 January 2011). "Rechtsextreme Parteien: Fusion von NPD und DVU ist unwirksam – Politik – Tagesspiegel". Der Tagesspiegel (in German). Retrieved 23 September 2018.
  46. "German far-right extremists tap into green movement for support". The Guardian. 28 April 2012. Retrieved 23 November 2021.
  47. Traynor, Ian (19 December 2013). "Dresden parliament in uproar at neo-Nazi outburst". The Guardian. Retrieved 12 August 2014.
  48. Hannah Cleaver, "German ruling says Dresden was a holocaust", Telegraph.co.uk, 12 April 2005.
  49. "Neo-Nazis hijack Dresden ceremony in the biggest far-right demonstration since Hitler". The Independent. London. 14 February 2005. Archived from the original on 5 March 2016. Retrieved 19 May 2010.
  50. Donahue, Patrick (14 February 2009). "Skinheads, Neo-Nazis Draw Fury at Dresden 1945 'Mourning March'". Bloomberg L.P. Archived from the original on 2 April 2021. Retrieved 14 February 2009.
  51. "Deutsche Welle article". Dw-world.de. Archived from the original on 9 February 2008. Retrieved 19 April 2012.
  52. Laura Smith-Spark, "Leipzig far-right rally dropped" Archived 30 December 2018 at the Wayback Machine, BBC News (20 June 2006)
  53. "NPD leader charged for racist campaign against black player in national football team". Der Spiegel. 25 March 2008. Archived from the original on 19 August 2009. Retrieved 21 July 2009.
  54. NPD-Chef Voigt zu Bewährungsstrafe verurteilt Archived 4 March 2012 at the Wayback Machine, sueddeutsche.de, 25. April 2009
  55. German pol decries ‘Jewish-Negro’ alliance Archived 6 February 2016 at the Wayback Machine, Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA), 11 November 2008 (retrieved on 5 December 2008.)
  56. Calls for prosecution after German politician says Obama win 'a declaration of war' by Jon Swaine, Telegraph.co.uk, 11 November 2008.
  57. Racism Rears Its Head in European Remarks on Obama Archived 2 April 2021 at the Wayback Machine by Craig Whitlock, Washington Post, page A15, 11 November 2008 (retrieved on 5 December 2008).
  58. "NPD-Politiker beleidigt Özil – DFB prüft Klage – Fußball – MSN Sport". Sport.de.msn.com. 31 December 1999. Archived from the original on 22 September 2009. Retrieved 15 October 2015.
  59. Weinthal, Benjamin (22 January 2009). "European Jewish Congress – Neo-Nazis plan Gaza 'Holocaust' vigil in Berlin". Eurojewcong.org. Archived from the original on 4 March 2016. Retrieved 19 April 2012.
  60. "Polen Invasion stoppen! - reakcja włodarzy i Merkel". www.zinfo.pl. Retrieved 3 July 2022.
  61. "Antypolskie plakaty na niemieckich słupach". wiadomosci.dziennik.pl (in Polish). 2 August 2009. Retrieved 3 July 2022.
  62. Far-right politician convicted over racist World Cup flyers Archived 27 April 2009 at the Wayback Machine. Deutsche Welle. Published 24 April 2009.
  63. "German 'race hate' letters probed". BBC News. 23 September 2009. Archived from the original on 16 April 2012. Retrieved 19 April 2012.
  64. "NPD sends offensive letter to candidates with Turkish background". Deutsche Welle. 22 September 2009. Archived from the original on 9 October 2012. Retrieved 15 October 2015.
  65. "Neo-Nazis tell immigrants to 'go home'". Agence France-Presse. 23 September 2009. Archived from the original on 31 December 2012. Retrieved 15 October 2015. Alt URL
  66. "Anger results after German neo-Nazis tell immigrant candidates to 'go home'". Canada.com. 22 September 2009. Archived from the original on 7 November 2009. Retrieved 15 October 2015.
  67. Bartsch, Matthias et al. (alpha list), "Germany Faces Tough Battle to Ban Far-Right NPD" Archived 8 December 2011 at the Wayback Machine, Der Spiegel, 12/07/2011. Trans. from the German by Christopher Sultan. Retrieved 8 December 2011.
  68. "Infiltrating the Far-Right: German Intelligence Has 130 Informants in Extremist Party – SPIEGEL ONLINE". Der Spiegel. 12 December 2011. Archived from the original on 22 March 2012. Retrieved 19 April 2012.
  69. "German far-right deputies expelled over clothing Archived 20 October 2018 at the Wayback Machine", BBC News, 13 June 2012. Accessed on 17 June 2012.
  70. "Germany seeks to ban far-right party". 3 News NZ. 6 December 2012. Archived from the original on 28 September 2013. Retrieved 5 December 2012.
  71. Berlin Won’t Join Effort to Ban Far-Right Party 20 March 2013 New York Times
  72. "Germany wants to ban the neo-Nazis of the NPD again, but why now? | Cas Mudde". the Guardian. 4 March 2016. Archived from the original on 11 February 2021. Retrieved 2 April 2021.
  73. BVerfG, Urteil des Zweiten Senats vom 17 January 2017 - 2 BvB 1/13 - Rn. (1-1010), http://www.bverfg.de/e/bs20170117_2bvb000113.html Archived 18 January 2017 at the Wayback Machine (in German)
  74. "German politicians seek way to bankrupt 'neo-Nazi' NPD", Ben Knight. Deutsche Welle. 20 January 2017. Accessed 20 January 2017
  75. "Ehemaliger Pfleger von Rudolf Heß wirbt bei NPD". Morgenpost.de. 23 July 2008. Archived from the original on 25 March 2012. Retrieved 19 April 2012.
  76. "After Nominating Rudolf Hess for Nobel Peace Prize: NPD Leader Charged with Inciting Race Hate". Der Spiegel. Reuters. 24 August 2007. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 15 October 2015.
  77. Rechtsextremisten thematisieren die internationale Fianzkrise Verfassungsschutz MV, 2 December 2008
  78. NPD party programme (in German) http://npd.de/inhalte/daten/dateiablage/br_parteiprogramm_a4.pdf Archived 19 March 2016 at the Wayback Machine
  79. Schreiber, Manfried; Chen, Yung Ping (1971). "Ideology of the National Democratic Party of Germany". Journal of Thought. 6 (2): 88–104. ISSN 0022-5231. JSTOR 42588238.
  80. Party program, p. 13. ("Deutschland ist größer als die Bundesrepublik! ... Wir fordern die Revision der nach dem Krieg abgeschlossenen Grenzanerkennungsverträge.")
  81. "Report of the Verfassungsschutz". Verfassungsschutz.de. Archived from the original on 11 January 2013. Retrieved 19 April 2012.
  82. Duke, David (1998). "My Awakening: A Path to Racial Understanding". Free Speech Press. Retrieved 15 October 2015.
  83. Feldman, Matthew (2004). Fascism: Post-war fascisms. Taylor & Francis. p. 371. ISBN 978-0-415-29020-3.
  84. Scully, Derek (11 October 2002). "Extreme-right group confirms Barrett link". The Irish Times. p. 1. Justin Barrett was an honorary guest at our event in Passau. I invited him. He sat with the delegates," said Mr Holger Apfel, the deputy leader of the NPD. "We have been in contact with his group since 1996. We are friendly with his Youth Defence organisation.
  85. Scully, Derek (12 October 2002). "'Neo-Nazis' affirm links with Youth Defence". The Irish Times. p. 9. Archived from the original on 14 October 2017. Retrieved 5 January 2017. A leading far-right politician in Germany has described the anti-abortion group Youth Defence as "an important part of our international network". Youth Defence is the backbone of the No to Nice Campaign, whose chief spokesman is Mr Justin Barrett.
  86. Humphreys, Joe (12 October 2002). "Barrett admits he attended far-right meeting". The Irish Times. p. 9. Archived from the original on 14 October 2017. Retrieved 5 January 2017. Mr Barrett, who earlier this week declined to confirm or deny to The Irish Times his attendance at the meeting in the Bavarian city of Passau in May 2000, yesterday admitted he attended the conference, as well as an estimated two other events linked to the NPD.
  87. "Am vorbit cu extremistul din Noua Dreaptă, cu nume de străin, care era să fie parlamentar în România". 14 December 2016.
  88. "US Condemns Croatian Neo-Nazi March for Trump". 27 February 2017. Archived from the original on 15 March 2021. Retrieved 2 April 2021.
  89. https://www.bundestag.de/resource/blob/411686/a378788b9fee7dae351a91154fff40dd/WD-1-022-09-pdf-data.pdf
  90. "Internet Archive Memento, 5 years 56 days after" (PDF). timetravel.mementoweb.org.
  91. "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 December 2020. Retrieved 9 October 2020.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  92. Bundesverfassungsschutz "Lagebild Antisemitismus", Juli 2020, S. 27
  93. "Eläköön Suomi! – Hurra Finnland!". Junge Nationalisten. 9 October 2020. Archived from the original on 10 October 2020. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
  94. "Europa – Jugend – [Re]generation. 3. JN-Europakongress: Ein Rückblick". Junge Nationalisten. 15 April 2020. Archived from the original on 22 October 2020. Retrieved 9 October 2020.
  95. "Gewalttätiger NPD-Tross". Endstation Rechts. (in German). Retrieved 19 July 2023.
  96. "Results Germany - The Federal Returning Officer". bundeswahlleiter.de. Archived from the original on 10 June 2019. Retrieved 10 June 2019.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.