Nuphar lutea

Nuphar lutea, the yellow water-lily, brandy-bottle, or spadderdock, is an aquatic plant of the family Nymphaeaceae, native to northern temperate and some subtropical regions of Europe, northwest Africa, western Asia, North America, and Cuba.[2][3] This interesting species found on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean was used as a food source and in medicinal practices from prehistoric times with potential research and medical applications going forward.[4]:30

Nuphar lutea
Nuphar lutea at Leiemeersen, Oostkamp, Belgium
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Angiosperms
Order: Nymphaeales
Family: Nymphaeaceae
Genus: Nuphar
Section: Nuphar sect. Nuphar
Species:
N. lutea
Binomial name
Nuphar lutea
Smith
Distribution of Nuphar lutea in Europe and Asia from a Kew Science map, Plants of the World website.
Distribution of Nuphar lutea in North America from a USDA website map

Etymology

Nuphar lutea’s wide distribution and long-standing interest as an object of food, medicine, horticulture and folklore has led to many common or popular names. The following list is testimony to this species’ long history:

Beaver Lily, Beaver More, Beaver Root, Bobber, Bonnets, Brandy Bottle, Bullhead Lily, Can-dock, Cow Lily, Dog Lily, Ducks, Flatterdock, Frog Lily, Globe Lily, Gold Watch, Hog Lily, Holy-Trinity Lily, Horse Lily, Kelp, Large Yellow Pond Lily, Lis d’Eau Jaune, Marsh Collaid, Mooseroot, Mulefoot, Mulefoot Bonnet, Mulefoot Lily, Muleshoe, Nenuphar jaune, Pied de cheval, Pond Poppy, Spatterdock, Splatterdock, Three Colored Lily, Toad Lily, Tuckahoe, Tuckey, Tucky Lily, Water Collard, Wokas, Yellow Lanterns, Yellow Pond Lily, and Yellow Water Lily.[5]

This species’ botanical name "Nuphar lutea (L.) Sm." includes its scientific name (Nuphar lutea), genus (Nuphar), specific epithet (lutea), a standard author abbreviation for Carl Linnaeus (L.), and an author citation for James Edward Smith (Sm.). Nuphar is derived from the Arabic and Persian ninufar, meaning “pond-lily.” Lutea is Latin for “golden, saffron, orange-yellow.” Carl Linnaeus (1701-1778) was the Swedish botanist, physician, and father of modern plant taxonomy, who first described the species. James Smith (1759-1828) was an English botanist and founder of the Linnean Society, the first person to segregate Nuphar from the genus Nymphaea, validating its current accepted botanical name. Smith “neglected shifting the feminine epithet of Nymphaea lutea to neuter Nuphar luteum, publishing the scientific name as Nuphar lutea.”[6] A 1998 proposal to amend the gender to the neuter Nuphar luteum was approved, but subsequently the name reverted to Smith’s original designation.[7]

Plant form and growth

Illustration of Nuphar lutea (L.) Sm. from Friedrich Gottlob’s 1813 book Plants Used in Medicine.

F. G. Hayne’s Faithful Representation and Description of the Plants Used in Medicine published in 1813 offered an illustration of Nuphar latea “in its natural size”—centered on its large crown leaf, several emerging leaflets from the plant’s root system (rhizome), and its distinctive yellow flower set on a stem above the water surface.[8] The copper plate from this early botanical treatise adds the following details: Figures 3 and 4, the male fertilizing organ (stamen) composed of filaments capped by pollen-containing anthers; Figures 5 and 6, the flower’s female reproductive part (pistil), containing a cup-like ovary topped by pollen-receptive tip (stigma), whole and cut lengthwise; Figures 7 and 8, the mature berry (ovule) protected by outer petals and sepals, whole and sliced; and Figures 9 through 12, the mature berry holding seed, natural size and enlarged, then sliced on two axes. The pollen grain photographed here is a 30.70 μm (micrometer) yellow sphere of prickly (echinate) ornamentation with well-developed spines indicating “primitive phylogenetic position of the genus [Nuphar] as well as for Nymphaeaceae [lily family].”[4]:14

Nuphar lutea flowers emerge about three years after seed germination, blooming mid-spring through early autumn, each flower taking 4 to 5 days to develop—a process incorporating secretion of a sweet-smelling nectar on the stigma, pollen cross-fertilization by a host of insects (bees, beetles, flies, aphids), expansion of the female reproductive parts (gynoecium) up to three times in diameter, birthing as many as 400 seeds, and finally dispersal of the seeds on the water surface as the seed-head bursts, spreading them up to 80 m/h (meters/hour) over a 72-hour period before they sink to the bottom.[4]:19–23

The flower is solitary, terminal, held above the water surface; it is hermaphrodite, 2–4 cm diameter, with five or six large bright yellow sepals and numerous small yellow petals largely concealed by the sepals. Flowering is from June to September, and pollination is entomophilous, by flies attracted to the alcoholic scent.[9] The flower is followed by a green bottle-shaped fruit, containing numerous seeds which are dispersed by water currents.

New plants or colonies of Nuphar lutea can also be generated by the root system pictured in the illustration, described as follows: “Branching, spongy, tuberous rhizomes 20-150 mm in diam., firmly attached to the substrate [lake floor], dense tangled hairs around leaf scars.”[10] New flower stalks and leaves—submerged and floating on the surface—continually emerge on the growing network of rhizomes. The common name “spadderdock” comes from spattered seed when the fruit bursts, the common name “brandy bottle” from the aroma produced by the flowers which is similar to stale alcohol.[11][12]



Taxonomy

Some botanists have treated Nuphar lutea as the sole species in Nuphar, including all the other species in it as subspecies and giving the species a holarctic range,[13][14] but the genus is now more usually divided into eight species (see Nuphar for details).[15]

Ecology

Habitat for Nuphar lutea ranges widely from moving to stagnant waters of “shallow lakes, ponds, swamps, river and stream margins, canals, ditches, and tidal reaches of freshwater streams;” alkaline to acidic waters; and sea level to mountainous lakes up to 10,000 feet in altitude.[4]:24 The species is less tolerant of water pollution than water-lilies in the genus Nymphaea.[9] This aquatic plant grows in shallow water and wetlands, with its roots in the sediment and its leaves floating on the water surface; it can grow in water up to 5 metres deep.[9] It is usually found in shallower water than the white water lily, and often in beaver ponds. Since the flooded soils are deficient in oxygen, aerenchyma in the leaves and rhizome transport oxygen from the atmosphere to the rhizome roots. Often there is mass flow from the young leaves into the rhizome, and out through the older leaves.[16] This “ventilation mechanism” has become the subject of research because of this species’ substantial benefit to the surrounding ecosystem by "exhaling" methane gas from lake sediments.[17]

Nuphar lutea plant colonies in turn are affected by organisms that graze on its leaves, gnaw on stems, and eat its roots, including turtles, birds, deer, moose, porcupines, and more. The rhizomes are often consumed by muskrats.[4]:27–29 The Waterlily Leaf Beetle, Galerucella nymphaeae, spends its entire life cycle around various Nuphar species, exposing leaf tissue to microbial attack and loss of floating ability.[18]

With other species in the Nymphaeales order, Nuphar lutea provides habitat for fish and a wide range of aquatic invertebrates, insects, snails, birds, turtles, crayfish, moose, deer, muskrats, porcupine, and beaver in shallow waters along lake, pond, and stream margins across the multiple continents where it is found.[19]

Two major threats to Nuphar lutea will continue to be global warming and eutrophication of the habitats in which its colonies have flourished. Significant research efforts have gone into establishing the consequences of crossing critical temperature, nitrogen, and phosphorus thresholds:

Global warming and eutrophication should consequently lead to N. lutea progression as long as temperature and productivity does not exceed a threshold value beyond which the plant will be unable to maintain a sufficient degree of oxidation of the rhizosphere for its survival.[20]

Geographical distribution


Nuphar Lutea has a wide distribution, including North America, Eurasia and northern Africa.

Research history

An early witness in the fossil record

Six fossil seed pods from Eocene epoch found on Seymour Island, Antarctica, from 2017 research in Plant Systematics and Evolution Journal article.

Plant fossil specimens confirm Nuphar lutea’s genus and family as early branches on the angiosperm tree. Noting gaps in the fossil record for Nymphaeales’ plant species, paleobotanical researchers report well-preserved Nuphar seeds from the early Eocene epoch -- 56 to 33.9 million years ago (mya) -- in coal mines of Japan and rock formations in China, identified positively based on their morphology and anatomy. These finds add to older fossil seeds unearthed in North Dakota, dating back to the Paleocene epoch (66-56 mya).[21]

The classification of Nymphaeales and phylogeny within the flowering plants are quite intriguing as several systems…have attempted to redefine the Nymphaeales taxonomy. There have been fossil records consisting especially of seeds, pollen, stems, leaves and flowers as early as the lower Cretaceous.[22]

The Cretaceous epoch -- a geological period which ran from 145 to 66 mya -- pushes Nuphar and its family of species to the evolutionary birth and rapid spread of flowering plants across the globe. That fact alone makes Nuphar lutea an object of intense research interest.

The six illustrations here of extinct Nymphaeales seeds -- or what are usually described as the plant berry or fruit in the literature -- found on Seymour Island, Antarctica, are well-preserved and date from the Eocene epoch. The species has been named Notonuphar antarctica, with the following illustration key: (a) seed with germination cap, (b) seed showing smooth outer surface, (c) broken seed showing cells of the protective outer layer (exotesta), (d) root tips or apical part of broken seed with germination cap preserved, (e) palisade-shaped cells of the exotesta, and (f) surface view of the seed shown in illustration (b).[23]

As a perennial food source

Nuphar lutea has a long history of usage as a valued food source. The field of archaeobotany documents this species’ tubers and charred seeds present in Vologda River digs in northern Russia since Early Neolithic times (ca 10,000 years BCE).[24] The author of Edible and Medicinal Plants offered the following summary of this species’ wide usage in the Native American diet, where harvesting was done by canoe in late summer and early autumn:

Native people gathered the thick rootstocks in winter and spring, boiled or roasted them for several hours, then peeled them to expose their sweet, gluey contents. Rootstocks were also sliced, dried and ground into meal or flour. The starchy seeds can be difficult to remove, so the tribes rotted the fruits until the pods became soft. The heated seeds swell like poor-quality popcorn, making a crunchy snack.”[25]

Official description and botanical name

Two names are now associated with Nuphar lutea’s more recent botanical record, Nuphar lutea (L.) Sm. -- Linnaeus (1753) and Smith (1809). The former adopted three names for the Nymphaea genus found in Europe and America, Nymphaea lutea for the yellow water lily, Nymphaea alba major for the white water lily, and Nymphaea nelumbo for India’s water lotus.[26] Smith distinguished yellow from white lilies by returning to the pre-Linnaean name Nuphar for yellow lutea, retaining the classical name Nymphaea for the white water lily. He thus received credit for separating Nuphar from the Nymphaea genus, officially naming this species.[27] By 1908, 10 varieties, 10 forms, and two subforms, or subspecies, were recognized under three Eurasian species, N. lutea, N. pumila, and N. intermedia.[28]

The identification of North American Nuphar species similarly expanded to include 17 species and two subspecies, based on a few variable characteristics, and resulting in the taxonomic confusion that has followed Nuphar lutea and its genus and family right up to the present time.[29]

Recent cladistic and phylogenetic findings

Bayesian Phylogram showing Nuphar lutea species on the Nuphar branch of its phylogenetic tree from a 2012 D. K. Biswal, etal. research article.

The evolutionary origin of angiosperms or Magnoliopsida – flowering plants with seeds that develop from fertilization of an ovule or egg within an enclosed hollow ovary – has long been a biological mystery.[30] The classic statement of this was made by Charles Darwin in 1879 in a letter to Joseph Dalton Hooker (1817-1911), Director of the Royal Botanical Gardens, Kew, London, in which he stated, “The rapid development as far as we can judge of all the higher plants within recent geological times is an abominable mystery.” Darwin’s 1879 letter was not referring to the angiosperm division (or clade) as is often assumed. He viewed this rapid and perplexing diversification taking place early in the Cretaceous period, ca 140 million years ago, in a sub-group of this division—the class formerly referred to as Magnoliopsida, now generally known as Dicotyledon plants or Dicots. This is an important starting point for human knowledge of the 79% of flowering plant species which rapidly spread across the planet in that early epoch.[31]

One of the reasons the genus and family of Nuphar lutea have become the subject of increasing cladistic focus is that this species is located in a basal position on the evolutionary tree, or in other words, among the earliest flowering plants on earth. Understanding lily development and genetic structure will provide clues to solving Darwin’s “abominable mystery”, the dynamics behind the sudden explosion of angiosperms across the globe. The following quote refers to the sister genus of Nuphar on that tree:

In the genus Nymphaea, flowers are composed of 4 sepals, 50 to 70 petals, 30 to 40 carpels, and 120 to 250 stamens. These characteristics are often regarded as the most primitive angiosperm floral characteristics, as seen in various ancestral flowering plant fossils. In the tree of plant life, basal angiosperms consisting of three orders Nymphaeales, Amborellales, and Austrobaileyales, have long been regarded as the basal branches of angiosperms using both molecular phylogenetic and developmental classifications...The genomic sequences of the water lily may be critical in resolving the early evolution of angiosperms.[32]

Figure 14B showing Nuphar lutea in a late stage of flower development, with the stamen’s distinct whorl pattern, from a research article.[33]

Interestingly, flower and rhizome formation in genus Nuphar has come under recent electron microscope study by phylogenetic researchers, on the assumption that the very first angiosperms—which have left no trace in the fossil record – share many of the unique characteristics of the basal genus of which Nuphar lutea is a part. Russian biologists are foremost in these efforts, exploring the "golden spiral" formation of the rhizome and the whorl mechanism by which flower parts develop—this photograph capturing a Nuphar lutea Gynoecium at a late stage in flower development, “pe” for petal and “s5” for one of its five sepals.[33]

[These researchers] found out that all the floral organs are arranged in cycles (whorls) rather than inserted sequentially in a spiral, as is the case in some other basal angiosperms. The ancestors of yellow pond-lily were among the first to diverge from the root of the angiosperm evolutionary tree, which is why it can be used to hypothesize about the structure of the first flowers.[34]

Accurately placing Nuphar and its sister species in the Nymphaeaceae family on the “Tree of Life” will also be a necessary step in sorting out taxonomic confusion that existed long before Linnaeus and Smith first distinguished and described this species within its plant family. The list of research articles using DNA barcoding to accurately plot Nuphar lutea on its phylogenetic tree (phylogram) is a long one. The phylogram included here depicts Nuphar lutea as a basal species in its branch of “the Nympheales group.”[22]:14–16 The following quote from Towards a Complete Species Tree of Nymphaea puts the need for continuing research in proper perspective:

A complete species phylogeny of water-lilies will not only be essential for better understanding of their evolutionary diversification but also is a prerequisite to study species limits and to arrive at a complete modern species assessment...In conclusion, it must be stated that a comprehensive monograph of Nymphaea with data on species distribution, ecology and conservation status is very much needed.”[35]

Conservation status

After the receding of the glaciers from Europe ca 15,000 years ago, populations of N. pumila and N. lutea have returned to the Swiss Alps, with 37 populations of the former identified. Several current threats to these plant colonies have been identified in Alpine Botany, including hybridization between these species, runoff from excessive nutrients (eutrophication), and climate change:

Priority should be given to the in situ conservation of genetically pure populations...N. pumila is an excellent representative of the wetland/aquatic glacial relicts that are particularly affected by the combination of climate change and habitat degradation. International integration of research and conservation programs is needed to limit the decline of such rare species in the Alps.[36]

The distribution or range maps included with this article certainly put Nuphar lutea in a global context, with limited regions where the species has been introduced (Bangladesh, New Zealand, and Primorye) and one where it has gone extinct (Sicilia). Conservation efforts on a global scale are needed to guarantee the benefits of this valuable species, its sisters, and genera in the lily family.[37]

Another conservation concern for this and the other plants is “the desertification of the world,” a leading cause for species extinction.

Plant-derived products have long been and will continue to be important sources of medical agents and models for the design, synthesis, and semi-synthesis of novel substances. So far, only 5 to 15 percent of the roughly 250,000 existing species of plants has been systematically surveyed for biological activity.[38]

There is another side to Nuphar lutea and like species, hinted at by its common name “Spatterdock” or “Splatterdock.” It can spread so fast under favorable conditions that some jurisdictions treat it like an invasive species. The Lake Lemon Conservancy District in southern Indiana has implemented an "Aquatic Plant Management Plan" with four methods for controlling its lake invasives—chemical or biological control, water level manipulation, and mechanical harvesting.[39]

Symbolism

Flag of Frisia

Stylized red leaves of the yellow water lily, known as seeblatts or pompeblêden are used as a symbol of Frisia. The flag of the Dutch province of Friesland features seven pompeblêden. Stone masons carved forms of the flowers on the roof bosses of Bristol Cathedral and Westminster Abbey, these are thought to encourage celibacy.[12]

Images

See also

References

  1. Akhani, H. 2014. Nuphar lutea. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2014: e.T164316A42398895. https://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2014-1.RLTS.T164316A42398895.en. Accessed on 07 June 2022.
  2. Flora Europaea: Nuphar lutea
  3. "Nuphar lutea". Germplasm Resources Information Network. Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Retrieved 17 December 2017.
  4. Padgett, Donald Jay (1997). A Biosystematic Monograph of the Genus Nuphar sm (Nymphaeaceae) (PDF) (Doctoral Dissertation). University of New Hampshire Scholars’ Repository. Retrieved December 21, 2020.
  5. Coffey, Timothy (1993). The History and Folklore of North American Wildflowers. New York City: Houghton Mifflin. ISBN 0395515939.
  6. Modzelevich, Martha. "Nuphar lutea, Yellow Pond-lily, Hebrew: נופר צהוב". Flowers of Israel. Retrieved December 22, 2020.
  7. Pacit, J. (February 1998). "Proposal to Amend the Gender of Nuphar, Non. Cons. (Nymphaeaceae), to Neuter". Taxon. 47 (1): 167. doi:10.2307/1224038. JSTOR 1224038. Retrieved December 28, 2020.
  8. Hayne, Friedrich Gottlob (1813). Getreue Darstellung und Beschreibung der in der Arzneykunde gebräuchlichen Gewächse. Berlin, Germany: Society of Friends of Nature, Natural Research Society, and Photographic Society in Gottingen. p. 368.
  9. Blamey, M. & Grey-Wilson, C. (1989). Flora of Britain and Northern Europe. ISBN 0-340-40170-2
  10. "Nuphar lutea (L.) Sm". NZFlora. Landcare Research. 2020. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
  11. "Nuphar lutea". Missouri Botanical Garden. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
  12. Reader's Digest Field Guide to the Wild Flowers of Britain. Reader's Digest. 1981. p. 29. ISBN 9780276002175.
  13. Beal, E. O. (1956). Taxonomic revision of the genus Nuphar Sm. of North America and Europe. Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society 72: 317–346.
  14. "Plants Profile: Nuphar lutea". Natural Resources Conservation Service. United States Department of Agriculture. Retrieved 13 April 2010.
  15. USDA Germplasm Resources Information Network: Nuphar Archived 2009-08-27 at the Wayback Machine
  16. Dacey, J. W. H. (1981). Pressurized ventilation in the yellow water lily. Ecology, 62, 1137–47.
  17. Dacey, J. W. H.; Klug, M. J. (March 23, 1979). "Methane Efflux from Lake Sediments Through Water Lilies". Science. 203 (4386): 1253–1255. Bibcode:1979Sci...203.1253D. doi:10.1126/science.203.4386.1253. PMID 17841139. S2CID 8478786.
  18. Kouki, Jari (December 1991). "The Effect of the Water-lily Beetle, Garerucella nymphaeae, on Leaf Production and Leaf Longevity of the Yellow Water-lily, Nuphar lutea". Freshwater Biology. 26 (3): 347–353. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2427.1991.tb01402.x. Retrieved December 23, 2020.
  19. "Nymphaeales". Encyclopedia of Life Sciences. John Wiley & Sons. February 26, 2003.
  20. Henriot CP, U.S. National Library of Medicine, et al. (October 17, 2019). "Relationships Between Key Functional Traits of the Waterlily Nuphar lutea and Wetland Nutrient Content". PeerJ. 7 (e7861): e7861. doi:10.7717/peerj.7861. PMC 6800984. PMID 31637127.
  21. Chan, Iju; Manchester, Stephen R.; Chen, Zhiduan (2004). "Anatomically Preserved Seeds of Nuphar (Nymphaeaceae) From the Early Eocene of Wuto, Shandong Province, China". American Journal of Botany. 91 (8): 1265–1272. doi:10.3732/ajb.91.8.1265. PMID 21653484.
  22. Biswal DK (2012). "Phylogenetic Reconstruction in the Order Nymphaeales: ITS2 Secondary Structure Analysis and In Silico Testing of Maturase k (matK) as a Potential Marker for DNA Bar Coding". BMC Bioinformatics. 13 (17): S26. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-S17-S26. PMC 3521246. PMID 23282079.
  23. Friis EM, Department of Palaeobiology, Swedish Museum of Natural History, et al. (June 14, 2017). "Notonuphar antarctica, An Extinct Water Lily (Nymphaeales) from the Eocene of Antarctica". Plant Systematics and Evolution. 303 (7): 969–980. doi:10.1007/s00606-017-1422-y.
  24. Vanhanen, Santeri; Lagerås, Per (2020). Archaeobotanical Studies of Past Plant Cultivation in Northern Europe. Kooiweg, Holland: Barkhuis. p. 109. ISBN 9789493194113.
  25. Kershaw, Linda J. (2000). Edible and Medicinal Plants of the Rockies. Canada: Lone Pine Publishing. ISBN 9781551052298.
  26. Linnaei, Caroli (1753). Species Plantarum, Exhibentes Plantas Rite Cognitas, ad Genera Relatas. Vol. 1. Sweden: Laurentii Salvii. pp. 510–511.
  27. Smith, Jacobus Edvardus; Sibthorp, Johannes (1906). Florae Graecae Prodromus: Sive Plantarum Omnium Enumeratio, quas In Provinciis Aut Insulis Graeciae. Vol. 1. London: Richardi Taylor Et Socii. pp. 361–362.
  28. Schuster, J. (1907). "Zur Systematik von Castalia und Nymphaea". Bulletin de l'Herbier Boissier. 2 (7): 853–868, 901–916, 981–996. Retrieved December 30, 2020.
  29. Miller, Jr., Gerrit Smith; Standley, Paul Carpenter (2010). The North American Species of Nvmphaea (1912). Whitefish, Montana: Kessinger Publishing, LLC. ISBN 978-1167176241.
  30. James, Robert A. (2008). "Flowering Plants". Evolution – The Transitional Fossils. Retrieved December 30, 2020. This website attempts to synthesize a phylogenetic tree for flowering plants based on the latest fossil evidence and cladistic research
  31. Buggs, Richard (May 24, 2017). "Darwin's Abominable Mystery". Ecology and Evolution. Nature Research Ecology & Evolution Community. Retrieved December 30, 2020.
  32. Chen F, Nanjing Agricultural University, et al. (October 4, 2017). "Water Lilies as Emerging Models for Darwin's Abominable Mystery". Horticulture Research. 4 (17051): 17051–. doi:10.1038/hortres.2017.51. PMC 5626932. PMID 28979789.
  33. El, Elena S.; Remizowa, Margarita V.; Sokoloff, Dmitry D. (May 19, 2020). "Developmental Flower and Rhizome Morphology in Nuphar (Nymphaeales): An Interplay of Chaos and Stability". Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology. 8 (303): 303. doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.00303. PMC 7248231. PMID 32509775.
  34. "Yellow Pond-lily Prefers Cyclic Flowers to Spiral Ones". BrightSurf Science News. Brightsurf.com: Amazon Services LLC. July 6, 2020. Retrieved January 2, 2021.
  35. Borsch T, Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, et al. (2011). "Towards a Complete Species Tree of Nymphaea: Shedding Further Light on Subg. Brachyceras and Its Relationships to the Australian Water-lilies". Telopea. 13 (1–2): 193–217. doi:10.7751/telopea20116014. Retrieved December 31, 2020.
  36. Bétrisey S, Arrigo N, Graf L, et al. (February 2020). "Glacial Relicts in the Alps: the Decline and Conservation Strategy for Nuphar pumila (Nymphaeaceae)" (PDF). Alpine Botany. 130 (1): 89–99. doi:10.1007/s00035-020-00232-9. S2CID 211171056.
  37. "Nymphaeaceae Salisb". PlantsoftheWorld Online. Kew Science. 2020. Retrieved December 30, 2020.
  38. Chan, Yuk Lun (November 25, 2012). "Yellow Water Lily May Hold Key for Cancer Treatment". NoCamels. Israel: The Asper Foundation. Retrieved December 29, 2020.
  39. Hoffmann, Jill (January 1, 2000). Aquatic Plant Management Plan 2000. Lake Lemon, Indiana: Indiana Department of Environmental Management. pp. 1–21.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.