Oberkassel, Bonn

Oberkassel is a suburb in the Bonn municipal district of Beuel in Germany. It lies on the right bank of the Rhine on the edge of the Siebengebirge mountains. Oberkassel has about 7,200 inhabitants.

Oberkassel coat of arms
Statistical district of Oberkassel in Bonn

History

In 1914, workers in a quarry detected a grave with a 50-year-old man, a 20-25-year-old woman and a dog. Carbon-14 datings estimated an age between 13,300 and 14,000 years. A study of the mitochondrial genome sequences in 2013 showed that the animal is indeed Canis lupus familiaris, not a wolf.[1]

Oberkassel was first mentioned as Cassele in 722/723 and as Cassela in 1144. The name Oberkassel refers to a Roman fortification; in the course of time "Römerkastell" (Roman castle) became "Oberkassel". Oberkassel absorbed the previously separate settlements of Berghoven (mentioned for the first time in 873), Büchel (mentioned for the first time in 1202), Broich (mentioned for the first time in 1306) and Meerhausen (mentioned for the first time in 1442).

In 1870 the East Rhine Railway reached Oberkassel and crossed the Rhine by train ferry to the West Rhine Railway. The train ferry was abandoned in 1919.

Transport

Bonn-Oberkassel station is on the East Rhine Railway.

The Bonn Stadtbahn (city rail of Bonn) with its lines 62 and 66 serves three stations in Oberkassel: Oberkassel Nord (SWB), Oberkassel Mitte and Oberkassel Süd/Römlinghoven.

The Bundesstrasse 42 (federal highway 42) traverses the south-eastern part of Oberkassel within a 500 m (1,600 ft) long tunnel. It has an exit near Ramersdorf.

Economy

Oberkassel is home of several divisions of the DLR, the German Aerospace Center.

Bonn-Oberkassel double burial

Oberkassel D999 and D998[2] (Ok1 and 2[3]) are a set of Paleolithic human skeletons discovered from 14,000 ka and 13,000 ka[2]-old deposits in a quarry. Jelinek et al. (1969) grouped these crania with Cro-Magnon under the name Homo sapiens fossilis alongside Vestonice, Brno, and Predmosti.[4] Typically, they are assigned to Homo sapiens, although a statue at Oberkassel is labeled as "Homo obercasseliensis"[5] and they were historically considered "close" to Neanderthals.[6] The two individuals comprise a male and female,[7] dog bones, and two bone and antler artworks. Being a Paleolithic double burial with domesticated dogs makes the site especially important.[8]

Discovery

"Homo obercasseliensis" statue at the discovery location

The burial was discovered in the quarry "Am Stingenberg", a popular basalt deposit where the double burial was discovered 99 m in a rubble dump near the base of a cliff. The initial report includes the burial and grave goods, a canine tooth, a reindeer, and a "bovid tooth" in a reddish layer with traces of charcoal.[6] Future human finds at the site are not impossible.[9] It was determined that the site was a place of burial and not storage, and that the hunters lived nearby in an overhang under the basalt wall. This would have provided a close location to bury their dead, but the isolated status of the double burial suggests that they did not like to lay their dead in their settlements.[10] The graves themselves were decorated in a large amount of red pigment and with careful stone arrangement.[6]

A dating given by Oxford in 1994 suggests an age of 12-11.35 ka,[11] a conclusion also reached by the Rhenish Office for the Preservation of Archaeological Monuments through soil samples. In 2014, the 100th anniversary of the find,[12] genetics determined that the individuals were not as related as siblings and may be potentially helpful for Out-Of-Africa.[13][14] They discovered a meaty diet with freshwater fish and mussels,[15] as well as plant gathering. They both grew up in different locations based on enamel isotopes. They ate closely related seeds from northern Scandinavia during childhood, suggesting that it served as a refugium for hunters. The woman had given birth at least once, and the man survived a fracture to the right ulna, and an injury to the left parietal that may have been an accident or a projectile, such as a slingshot.[13]

Skulls

Fossil (left) and reconstruction (right) of the woman (top) and man (bottom) from Oberkassel

The skull of the woman is notable in having disintegrated sutures leading to mispositioning of the nasals and temporals as well as defects to the cranial base. It is 184 mm long, 129 mm in width, and 135 mm in height. The jaw apparatus is very well developed, the forehead is wider, the chin is strong, and the square orbits are large. The third right upper molar was missing in life and the molars bear less wear indicating a sooner eruption time, but otherwise the dentition was complete. The body of the woman was first suggested to be 1.55 m (~5'1 f) tall and 20 years old, but current estimates suggest 1.6-1.63 m (~5'2-5'3 f) in height and 25 years in age. The man was first considered strange because of the facial breadth and robusticity (assuming these traits are unique to Neanderthals). The male skull is 193 mm long, 144 mm wide, and 138 mm high. This individual was around 40-50 years of age, only retaining the final two molars (which sat at an incline) and an upper canine. The exposed dentin is black and the enamel is greatly worn on all remaining teeth, and the teeth not accounted for were all lost during life. Original height calculations suggested great physical strength and a stature of 1.6 m (~5'2 f), but current calculations recover 1.67-1.68 m (~5'4-5'5 f).[16] The man exhibits massiveness characteristic of upper Paleolithic people and also seen in Neanderthals.[17]

Classification

Robert Bonnet initially attempted classification of the Oberkassel burial, finding resemblance to the Neanderthals in the skull of the man and resemblance to the Cro-Magnon humans through the narrow nose, sloped rectangular orbits, angled mandible, pronounced chin, and low, long face. He suggested that this population was subject to introgression, as evidenced by the morphology of each individual.[6] Josef Szombathy (1920) first classified these hominins solely with Cro-Magnons, although recent research agrees that humans of this time were much more uniform than early racial classification suggests. Winfried Henke, who considers these specimens very important, investigated the burial in 1986 and especially focused on phrenological comparison, which is today considered pseudoscientific.[18] He found "typical" European morphology, characterizing the man as "averagely robust" and the woman as "hyper-feminine type". Henke considered Oberkassel "decisive" as an ancestral role.[19][20]

Objects

Various cultural items at Oberkassel.
Various cultural items at Oberkassel.
The animal sculpture or possible antler.
The animal sculpture or possible antler.

In 1914, grave goods were recorded from the burial and considered important to defining the cultural stage of the population. Franz Heiderich discovered an "animal" or "horse" head after quarry workers noted a "hair arrow" (initially thought to be a hairpin).[6] Made from antler, the animal head is a flat plate 8.5 cm long, 1 cm thick, and 3.4-4 cm wide and outlines the body, limbs, and head. The rear likely broke during excavation but it has not since been recovered. The piece was likely carved out of a larger material and engraved on both sides, identification as an antler is also possible.[10] most notably with hatching to denote the stomach and neck.[21] It is assumed to be an elk, similar to those of the Magdalenian found in France and England, and a probable part of the Federmesser culture; it was not wearable.[22] Also found was one of the oldest animal staffs.[23] Verworn misinterpreted the sculpture as a Magdalenian cut-out and as such assigned to Magdalenian IV, which was proven incorrect by radiocarbon dating and stylistic elements.[6][24] Verworn correctly described an "unworked awl-shaped animal bone", which was created with the baculum of what is likely a brown bear.[20]

Fauna

Dog skeleton from the burial

The domestic dog presence at the site is the oldest undisputed record of this canine in the fossil record.[25] Günter Nobis (1986) published a report on the local animals at the burial, revising Steinmann (1919). Some of the original fauna include domestic dogs, the brown bear, red deer, and aurochs/steppe bison (the bovines being too fragmentary to cement an identification).[26] Nobis erroneously suggested a lynx and roe deer, but they may be dog remains instead. Previously, the dog remains were suggested to be wolf. This specimen was one in a data pool that concluded that the species was domesticated 32-18 ka.[27][25]

Notable residents

  • Gottfried Kinkel, * August 11, 1815 in Oberkassel, † 13 November 1882, poet also noted for his revolutionary activities
  • Ernest, Count of Lippe-Biesterfeld, * 9 June 1842 in Oberkassel, † 26 September 1904, head of the Lippe-Biesterfeld line of the House of Lippe, regent of the Principality of Lippe

References

  1. Thalmann, O. (2013). "Complete mitochondrial genomes of ancient canids suggest a European origin of domestic dogs". Science. 342 (6160): 871–4. doi:10.1126/science.1243650. PMID 24233726.
  2. Neubauer, Simon; Hublin, Jean-Jacques; Gunz, Philipp (2018). "The evolution of modern human brain shape". Science Advances. 4 (1): eaao5961. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aao5961. ISSN 2375-2548. PMC 5783678. PMID 29376123.
  3. Gunz, Philipp; Bookstein, Fred L.; Mitteroecker, Philipp; Stadlmayr, Andrea; Seidler, Horst; Weber, Gerhard W. (2009). "Early modern human diversity suggests subdivided population structure and a complex out-of-Africa scenario". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106 (15): 6094–6098. doi:10.1073/pnas.0808160106. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 2669363. PMID 19307568.
  4. Jelinek, Jan; Dupree, Louis; Gallus, Alexander; Gams, Helmut; Narr, Karl J.; Poulianos, Aris N.; Sackett, James R.; Schott, Lothar; Suchy, Jaroslav; Yakimov, V. P. (1969). "Neanderthal Man and Homo sapiens in Central and Eastern Europe [and Comments and Reply]". Current Anthropology. 10 (5): 475–503. doi:10.1086/201049. ISSN 0011-3204.
  5. Wikipedia, Leonce49 at German (2006-04-10), Viktor Eichler: Der erste rheinische Steinzeitmensch – Brunnen-Denkmal für den Steinzeitmenschen aus dem Doppelgrab von Oberkassel (in German), retrieved 2023-08-02
  6. VERWORN, Max (1919). Der Diluviale Menschenfund Von Obercassel Bei Bonn. Bearbeitet M. Verworn, R. Bonnet und G. Steinmann, Etc (in German).
  7. Callaway, Ewen (2023-03-09). "Ancient genomes show how humans escaped Europe's deep freeze". Nature. 615 (7951): 197–198. doi:10.1038/d41586-023-00611-2. ISSN 0028-0836.
  8. "LVR-LandesMuseum Bonn". 2022-12-06. Archived from the original on 2022-12-06. Retrieved 2023-08-01.
  9. "Wayback Machine" (PDF) (in German). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2014-02-22. Retrieved 2023-08-01.
  10. Street, Martin; Terberger, Thomas; Orschiedt, Jörg (2006). "A critical review of the German Paleolithic hominin record". Journal of Human Evolution. 51 (6): 551–579. doi:10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.04.014.
  11. Baales, Michael (1998-01-01). "Baales & Street 1998 – Late Palaeolithic Backed-Point assemblages in the northern Rhineland: current research and changing views – NP". Notae Praehistoricae.
  12. "Aktuelle Nachrichten | General-Anzeiger Bonn". ga.de (in German). Retrieved 2023-08-02.
  13. "• Wann verließ der moderne Mensch Afrika? • [Archäologie Online] • •" (in German). 2013-05-08. Archived from the original on 2013-05-08. Retrieved 2023-08-02.
  14. Fu, Qiaomei; Mittnik, Alissa; Johnson, Philip L.F.; Bos, Kirsten; Lari, Martina; Bollongino, Ruth; Sun, Chengkai; Giemsch, Liane; Schmitz, Ralf; Burger, Joachim; Ronchitelli, Anna Maria; Martini, Fabio; Cremonesi, Renata G.; Svoboda, Jiří; Bauer, Peter (2013). "A Revised Timescale for Human Evolution Based on Ancient Mitochondrial Genomes". Current Biology. 23 (7): 553–559. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.02.044.
  15. Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte; Meller, Harald; Schefzik, Michael, eds. (2015). Krieg - eine archäologische Spurensuche: Begleitband zur Sonderausstellung im Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte Halle (Saale) ; 6. November 2015 bis 22. Mai 2016 (in German). Halle (Saale): Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt, Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte. ISBN 978-3-8062-3172-4.
  16. Schmitz, Ralf W. (2006). "Homo sapiens aus Bonn-Oberkassel (Deutschland)". Rheinisches Landesmuseum Bonn (in German): 350.
  17. Pearson, Osbjorn M. (2000). "Postcranial remains and the origin of modern humans". Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews. 9 (6): 229–247. doi:10.1002/1520-6505(2000)9:6<229::AID-EVAN1002>3.0.CO;2-Z. ISSN 1060-1538.
  18. "Phrenology | History, Theory, & Pseudoscience | Britannica". www.britannica.com. 2023-06-15. Retrieved 2023-08-02.
  19. "Die späteiszeitlichen Funde von Bonn-Oberkassel". nwbib.de (in German). Retrieved 2023-08-02.
  20. Henke, Winfried (1986). "Die morphologischen Affinitäten der magdalénienzeitlichen Menschenfunde von Oberkassel". Bonner Jahrbücher (in German). 186: 331.
  21. Bauer, Anne (1989). Die Steinzeitmenschen von Oberkassel: ein Bericht über das Doppelgrab am Stingenberg (in German). Heimatverein.
  22. Veil, Stephan; Breest, Klaus (2002). "The archaeological context of the art objects from the Federmesser site of Weitsche, Ldkr. Lüchow-Dannenberg, Lower Saxony (Germany) – a preliminary report". Recent Studies in the Final Palaeolithic of the European Plain: 129–13.
  23. Veil, Stephan; Breest, Klaus; Grootes, Pieter; Nadeau, Marie-Josée; Hüls, Matthias (2012). "A 14 000-year-old amber elk and the origins of northern European art". Antiquity. 86 (333): 660–673. doi:10.1017/S0003598X00047839. ISSN 0003-598X.
  24. Baales, M. (2002). "Exkurs: Bonn-Oberkassel (Nordrhein-Westfalen)". Der spätpaläolithische Fundplatz Kettich (in German).
  25. Thalmann, O.; Shapiro, B.; Cui, P.; Schuenemann, V. J.; Sawyer, S. K.; Greenfield, D. L.; Germonpré, M. B.; Sablin, M. V.; López-Giráldez, F.; Domingo-Roura, X.; Napierala, H.; Uerpmann, H-P.; Loponte, D. M.; Acosta, A. A.; Giemsch, L. (2013-11-15). "Complete Mitochondrial Genomes of Ancient Canids Suggest a European Origin of Domestic Dogs". Science. 342 (6160): 871–874. doi:10.1126/science.1243650. ISSN 0036-8075.
  26. Henke, Wilfried; Schmitz, Ralf W.; Street, Martin (2006). "Der Hund von Bonn-Oberkassel und die weiteren Faunenreste. aus: Die späteiszeitlichen Funde von Bonn-Oberkassel". Rheinisches Landesmuseum: Roots – Wurzeln der Menschheit (in German): 249–252.
  27. Nobis, Günter (1986). "Die Wildsäugetiere in der Umwelt des Menschen von Oberkassel bei Bonn und das Domestikationsproblem von Wölfen im Jungpaläolithikum". Bonner Jahrbücher (in German): 367–376. doi:10.11588/bjb.1986.0.63839. ISSN 2509-6141.

50°42′50″N 7°10′0″E

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.