n-flake

The Sierpinski triangle is an n-flake formed by successive flakes of three triangles. Each flake is formed by placing triangles scaled by 1/2 in each corner of the triangle they replace. Its Hausdorff dimension is equal to ${\displaystyle \textstyle {\frac {\log(3)}{\log(2)}}}$ ≈ 1.585. The ${\displaystyle \textstyle {\frac {\log(3)}{\log(2)}}}$ is obtained because each iteration has 3 triangles that are scaled by 1/2.

• 
  The sixth iteration of the Sierpinski triangle.
• 
  The Sierpinski triangle created by the chaos game.

The fifth iteration of the Vicsek fractal

If a sierpinski 4-gon were constructed from the given definition, the scale factor would be 1/2 and the fractal would simply be a square. A more interesting alternative, the Vicsek fractal, rarely called a quadraflake, is formed by successive flakes of five squares scaled by 1/3. Each flake is formed either by placing a scaled square in each corner and one in the center or one on each side of the square and one in the center. Its Hausdorff dimension is equal to ${\displaystyle \textstyle {\frac {\log(5)}{\log(3)}}}$ ≈ 1.4650. The ${\displaystyle \textstyle {\frac {\log(5)}{\log(3)}}}$ is obtained because each iteration has 5 squares that are scaled by 1/3. The boundary of the Vicsek Fractal is a Type 1 quadratic Koch curve.

Zooming into the boundary of the pentaflake

A pentaflake, or sierpinski pentagon, is formed by successive flakes of six regular pentagons.[3] Each flake is formed by placing a pentagon in each corner and one in the center. Its Hausdorff dimension is equal to ${\displaystyle \textstyle {\frac {\log(6)}{\log(1+\varphi )}}}$ ≈ 1.8617, where ${\displaystyle \textstyle {\varphi ={\frac {1+{\sqrt {5}}}{2}}}}$ (golden ratio). The ${\displaystyle \textstyle {\frac {\log(6)}{\log(1+\varphi )}}}$ is obtained because each iteration has 6 pentagons that are scaled by ${\displaystyle \textstyle {\frac {1}{1+\varphi }}}$. The boundary of a pentaflake is the Koch curve of 72 degrees.

There is also a variation of the pentaflake that has no central pentagon. Its Hausdorff dimension equals ${\displaystyle \textstyle {\frac {\log(5)}{\log(1+\varphi )}}}$ ≈ 1.6723. This variation still contains infinitely many Koch curves, but they are somewhat more visible.

• 
• 
  3rd iteration, with center pentagons
• 
  4th iteration, with center pentagons
• 
  5th iteration, with center pentagons

• 
  2nd iteration, without center pentagons
• 
  3rd iteration, without center pentagons
• 
  4th iteration, without center pentagons
• 
  5th iteration, without center pentagons

Concentric patterns of pentaflake boundary shaped tiles can cover the plane, with the central point being covered by a third shape formed of segments of 72-degree Koch curve, also with 5-fold rotational and reflective symmetry.

• 
  Pentaflake tiling. Center point not covered.
• 
  Pentaflake tiling. Center point covered.

A hexaflake, is formed by successive flakes of seven regular hexagons.[4] Each flake is formed by placing a scaled hexagon in each corner and one in the center. Each iteration has 7 hexagons that are scaled by 1/3. Therefore the hexaflake has 7ⁿ⁻¹ hexagons in its nth iteration, and its Hausdorff dimension is equal to ${\displaystyle \textstyle {\frac {\log(7)}{\log(3)}}}$ ≈ 1.7712. The boundary of a hexaflake is the standard Koch curve of 60 degrees and infinitely many Koch snowflakes are contained within. Also, the projection of the cantor cube onto the plane orthogonal to its main diagonal is a hexaflake. The hexaflake has been applied in the design of antennas[4] and optical fibers.[5]

Like the pentaflake, there is also a variation of the hexaflake, called the Sierpinski hexagon, that has no central hexagon.[6] Its Hausdorff dimension equals ${\displaystyle \textstyle {\frac {\log(6)}{\log(3)}}}$ ≈ 1.6309. This variation still contains infinitely many Koch curves of 60 degrees.

• 
  Hexaflake
• 
  The first six iterations of the hexaflake.
• 
  Fourth iteration of the Sierpinski hexagon.
• 
  Orthogonal projection of a cantor cube showing a hexaflake.

n-flakes of higher polygons also exist, though they are less common and don't usually have a central polygon. Some examples are shown below; the 7-flake through 12-flake. While it may not be obvious, these higher polyflakes still contain infinitely many Koch curves, but the angle of the Koch curves decreases as n increases. Their Hausdorff dimensions are slightly more difficult to calculate than lower n-flakes because their scale factor is less obvious. However, the Hausdorff dimension is always less than two but no less than one. An interesting n-flake is the ∞-flake, because as the value of n increases, an n-flake's Hausdorff dimension approaches 1,[1]^: 7

• 
  The first four iterations of the heptaflake or 7-flake.
• 
  The first four iterations of the octoflake or 8-flake.
• 
  The first four iterations of the enneaflake or 9-flake.
• 
  The first four iterations of the decaflake or 10-flake.
• 
  The first four iterations of the hendecaflake or 11-flake.
• 
  The first four iterations of the dodecaflake or 12-flake.

A Sierpinski tetrahedron is formed by successive flakes of four regular tetrahedrons. Each flake is formed by placing a tetrahedron scaled by 1/2 in each corner. Its Hausdorff dimension is equal to ${\displaystyle \textstyle {\frac {\log(4)}{\log(2)}}}$, which is exactly equal to 2. On every face there is a Sierpinski triangle and infinitely many are contained within.

• 
  The third iteration of the Sierpinski tetrahedron.

A hexahedron, or cube, flake defined in the same way as the Sierpinski tetrahedron is simply a cube[9] and is not interesting as a fractal. However, there are two pleasing alternatives. One is the Menger Sponge, where every cube is replaced by a three dimensional ring of cubes. Its Hausdorff dimension is ${\displaystyle \textstyle {\frac {\log(20)}{\log(3)}}}$ ≈ 2.7268.

Another hexahedron flake can be produced in a manner similar to the Vicsek fractal extended to three dimensions. Every cube is divided into 27 smaller cubes and the center cross is retained, which is the opposite of the Menger sponge where the cross is removed. However, it is not the Menger Sponge complement. Its Hausdorff dimension is ${\displaystyle \textstyle {\frac {\log(7)}{\log(3)}}}$ ≈ 1.7712, because a cross of 7 cubes, each scaled by 1/3, replaces each cube.

• 
  The fourth iteration of the Menger Sponge.
• 
  Third iteration of the 3D Vicsek fractal.

An octahedron flake, or sierpinski octahedron, is formed by successive flakes of six regular octahedra. Each flake is formed by placing an octahedron scaled by 1/2 in each corner. Its Hausdorff dimension is equal to ${\displaystyle \textstyle {\frac {\log(6)}{\log(2)}}}$ ≈ 2.5849. On every face there is a Sierpinski triangle and infinitely many are contained within.

• 
  The third iteration of the octahedron flake.

A dodecahedron flake, or sierpinski dodecahedron, is formed by successive flakes of twenty regular dodecahedra. Each flake is formed by placing a dodecahedron scaled by ${\displaystyle \textstyle {\frac {1}{2+\varphi }}}$ in each corner. Its Hausdorff dimension is equal to ${\displaystyle \textstyle {\frac {\log(20)}{\log(2+\varphi )}}}$ ≈ 2.3296.

• 
  The second iteration of the dodecahedron fractal flake.

An icosahedron flake, or sierpinski icosahedron, is formed by successive flakes of twelve regular icosahedra. Each flake is formed by placing an icosahedron scaled by ${\displaystyle \textstyle {\frac {1}{1+\varphi }}}$ in each corner. Its Hausdorff dimension is equal to ${\displaystyle \textstyle {\frac {\log(12)}{\log(1+\varphi )}}}$ ≈ 2.5819.

• 
  The third iteration of the icosahedron fractal flake.