Foundry model
The foundry model is a microelectronics engineering and manufacturing business model consisting of a semiconductor fabrication plant, or foundry, and an integrated circuit design operation, each belonging to separate companies or subsidiaries.[1][2][3][4]
Integrated device manufacturers (IDMs) design and manufacture integrated circuits. Many companies, known as fabless semiconductor companies, only design devices; merchant or pure play foundries only manufacture devices for other companies, without designing them. Examples of IDMs are Intel, Samsung, and Texas Instruments, examples of pure play foundries are GlobalFoundries, TSMC, and UMC, and examples of fabless companies are AMD, Nvidia, and Qualcomm.
Integrated circuit production facilities are expensive to build and maintain. Unless they can be kept at nearly full use, they will become a drain on the finances of the company that owns them. The foundry model uses two methods to avoid these costs: fabless companies avoid costs by not owning such facilities. Merchant foundries, on the other hand, find work from the worldwide pool of fabless companies, through careful scheduling, pricing, and contracting, keep their plants in full use.
History
Companies that both designed and produced the devices were originally responsible for manufacturing microelectronic devices. These manufacturers were involved in both the research and development of manufacturing processes and the research and development of microcircuit design.
The first pure play semiconductor company is the Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corporation, a spin-off of the government Industrial Technology Research Institute, which split its design and fabrication divisions in 1987,[5] a model advocated for by Carver Mead in the U.S., but deemed too costly to pursue. The separation of design and fabrication became known as the foundry model, with fabless manufacturing outsourcing to semiconductor foundries.[6]
Fabless semiconductor companies do not have any semiconductor fabrication capability; and contract production with a merchant foundry manufacturer. The fabless company concentrates on the research and development of an IC-product; the foundry concentrates on manufacturing and testing the physical product. If the foundry does not have any semiconductor design capability, it is a pure-play semiconductor foundry.
An absolute separation into fabless and foundry companies is not necessary. Some companies continue to exist that perform both operations and benefit from the close coupling of their skills. Some companies manufacture some of their own designs and contract out to have others manufactured or designed, in cases where they see value or seek special skills. The foundry model is a business vision that seeks to optimize productivity.
MOSIS
The very first merchant foundries were part of the MOSIS service. The MOSIS service gave limited production access to designers with limited means, such as students, university researchers, and engineers at small startups.[7] The designer submitted designs, and these submissions were manufactured with the commercial company's extra capacity. Manufacturers could insert some wafers for a MOSIS design into a collection of their own wafers when a processing step was compatible with both operations. The commercial company (serving as foundry) was already running the process, so they were effectively being paid by MOSIS for something they were already doing. A factory with excess capacity during slow periods could also run MOSIS designs to avoid having expensive capital equipment stand idle.
Under-use of an expensive manufacturing plant could lead to the financial ruin of the owner, so selling surplus wafer capacity was a way to maximize the fab's use. Hence, economic factors created a climate where fab operators wanted to sell surplus wafer-manufacturing capacity and designers wanted to purchase manufacturing capacity rather than try to build it.
Although MOSIS opened the doors to some fabless customers, earning additional revenue for the foundry and providing inexpensive service to the customer, running a business around MOSIS production was difficult. The merchant foundries sold wafer capacity on a surplus basis, as a secondary business activity. Services to the customers were secondary to the commercial business, with little guarantee of support. The choice of merchant dictated the design, development flow, and available techniques to the fabless customer. Merchant foundries might require proprietary and non-portable preparation steps. Foundries concerned with protecting what they considered trade secrets of their methodologies might only be willing to release data to designers after an onerous nondisclosure procedure.
Dedicated foundry
In 1987, the world's first dedicated merchant foundry opened its doors: Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC).[8] The distinction of 'dedicated' is in reference to the typical merchant foundry of the era, whose primary business activity was building and selling of its own IC-products. The dedicated foundry offers several key advantages to its customers: first, it does not sell finished IC-products into the supply channel; thus a dedicated foundry will never compete directly with its fabless customers (obviating a common concern of fabless companies). Second, the dedicated foundry can scale production capacity to a customer's needs, offering low-quantity shuttle services in addition to full-scale production lines. Finally, the dedicated foundry offers a "COT-flow" (customer owned tooling) based on industry-standard EDA systems, whereas many IDM merchants required its customers to use proprietary (non-portable) development tools. The COT advantage gave the customer complete control over the design process, from concept to final design.
Foundry sales leaders by year
- Pure-play semiconductor foundry is a company that does not offer a significant amount of IC products of its own design, but instead operates semiconductor fabrication plants focused on producing ICs for other companies.[9]
- Integrated device manufacturer (IDM) semiconductor foundry is where companies such as Texas Instruments, IBM, and Samsung join in to provide foundry services as long as there is no conflict of interest between relevant parties.
2017
Rank | Company | Foundry type | Country/Territory of origin | Revenue (million USD) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | 2017 | 2016 | |||
1 | TSMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 32,040 | 29,437 |
2 | Globalfoundries | Pure-play | United States | 5,407 | 4,999 |
3 | UMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 4,898 | 4,587 |
4 | Samsung Semiconductor | IDM | Korea | 7,398 | 4,284 |
5 | SMIC | Pure-play | China | 3,099 | 2,914 |
6 | TowerJazz | Pure-play | Israel | 1,388 | 1,249 |
7 | PowerChip | IDM | Taiwan | 1,035 | 870 |
8 | Vanguard (VIS) | Pure-play | Taiwan | 817 | 801 |
9 | Hua Hong Semiconductor | Pure-play | China | 807 | 721 |
10 | Dongbu HiTek | Pure-play | Korea | 676 | 666 |
2016–2014
Rank | Company | Foundry type | Country/Territory of origin | Revenue (million USD) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | 2015 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |||
1 | 1 | TSMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 29,488 | 25,574 | 25,138 |
2 | 2 | Globalfoundries | Pure-play | United States | 5,545 | 5,019 | 4,355 |
3 | 3 | UMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 4,582 | 4,464 | 4,331 |
4 | 4 | SMIC | Pure-play | China | 2,921 | 2,236 | 1,970 |
5 | 5 | PowerChip | Pure-play | Taiwan | 1,275 | 1,268 | 1,291 |
6 | 6 | TowerJazz | Pure-play | Israel | 1,249 | 961 | 828 |
7 | 7 | Ruselectronics[13][14] | Pure-play | Russia | 971 | 774 | 800 |
8 | 8 | Vanguard (VIS) | Pure-play | Taiwan | 800 | 736 | 790 |
9 | 9 | Hua Hong Semi | Pure-play | China | 712 | 650 | 665 |
10 | 10 | Dongbu HiTek | Pure-play | Korea | 672 | 593 | 541 |
11 | 12 | X-Fab | Pure-play | Germany | 510 | 331 | 330 |
12 | 13 | Crocus Nano Electronics (CNE) | Pure-play | Russia | – | – | – |
Others | Pure-play | 2,251 | 2,405 | 2,280 |
2013
2013 Rank | 2012 Rank | Company | Foundry Type | Country/Territory of origin | Revenue (million $USD) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1 | TSMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 19,850 |
2 | 2 | Globalfoundries | Pure-play | United States | 4,261 |
3 | 3 | UMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 3,959 |
4 | 4 | Samsung Semiconductor | IDM | Korea | 3,950 |
5 | 5 | SMIC | Pure-play | China | 1,973 |
6 | – | Ruselectronics[16] | Pure-play | Russia | 1,200 |
7 | 8 | PowerChip | Pure-play | Taiwan | 1,175 |
8 | 9 | Vanguard (VIS) | Pure-play | Taiwan | 713 |
9 | 6 | Huahong Grace | Pure-play | China | 710 |
10 | 10 | Dongbu | Pure-play | Korea | 570 |
11 | 7 | TowerJazz | Pure-play | Israel | 509 |
12 | 11 | IBM | IDM | United States | 485 |
13 | 12 | MagnaChip | IDM | Korea | 411 |
14 | 13 | Win Semiconductors | Pure-play | Taiwan | 354 |
15 | 14 | Crocus Nano Electronics (CNE) | Pure-play | Russia | – |
2011
Rank | Company | Foundry type | Country/Territory of origin | Revenue (million USD) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | TSMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 14,600 |
2 | UMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 3,760 |
3 | Globalfoundries | Pure-play | United States | 3,580 |
4 | Samsung Semiconductor | IDM | Korea | 1,975 |
5 | SMIC | Pure-play | China | 1,315 |
6 | TowerJazz | Pure-play | Israel | 610 |
7 | Vanguard (VIS) | Pure-play | Taiwan | 519 |
8 | Dongbu HiTek | Pure-play | Korea | 500 |
9 | IBM | IDM | United States | 445 |
10 | MagnaChip | IDM | Korea | 350 |
11 | SSMC | Pure-play | Singapore | 345 |
12 | Hua Hong NEC | Pure-play | China | 335 |
13 | Win Semiconductors | Pure-play | Taiwan | 300 |
14 | X-Fab | Pure-play | Germany | 285 |
2010
Rank | Company | Foundry Type | Country/Territory of origin | Revenue (million USD) |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | TSMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 13,332 |
2 | UMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 3,824 |
3 | Globalfoundries | Pure-play | United States | 3,520 |
4 | SMIC | Pure-play | China | 1,554 |
5 | Dongbu HiTek | Pure-play | Korea | 512 |
6 | TowerJazz | Pure-play | Israel | 509 |
7 | Vanguard (VIS) | Pure-play | Taiwan | 505 |
8 | IBM | IDM | United States | 500 |
9 | MagnaChip | IDM | Korea | 410 |
10 | Samsung Semiconductor | IDM | Korea | 390 |
2009–2007
As of 2009, the top 17 semiconductor foundries were:[19]
Rank | Company | Foundry type | Country/Territory of origin | Revenue (million USD) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2009 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | |||
1 | TSMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 8,989 | 10,556 | 9,813 |
2 | UMC | Pure-play | Taiwan | 2,815 | 3,070 | 3,430 |
3 | Chartered(1) | Pure-play | Singapore | 1,540 | 1,743 | 1,458 |
4 | GlobalFoundries | Pure-play | USA | 1,101 | 0 | 0 |
5 | SMIC | Pure-play | China | 1,075 | 1,353 | 1,550 |
6 | Dongbu | Pure-play | South Korea | 395 | 490 | 510 |
7 | Vanguard | Pure-play | Taiwan | 382 | 511 | 486 |
8 | IBM | IDM | USA | 335 | 400 | 570 |
9 | Samsung | IDM | South Korea | 325 | 370 | 355 |
10 | Grace | Pure-play | China | 310 | 335 | 310 |
11 | HeJian | Pure-play | China | 305 | 345 | 330 |
12 | Tower Semiconductor | Pure-play | Israel | 292 | 252 | 231 |
13 | HHNEC | Pure-play | China | 290 | 350 | 335 |
14 | SSMC | Pure-play | Singapore | 280 | 340 | 359 |
15 | Texas Instruments | IDM | USA | 250 | 315 | 450 |
16 | X-Fab | Pure-play | Germany | 223 | 368 | 410 |
17 | MagnaChip | IDM | South Korea | 220 | 290 | 322 |
(1) Now acquired by GlobalFoundries
2008–2006
As of 2008, the top 18 pure-play semiconductor foundries were:[20]
Rank | Company | Country/Territory of origin | Revenue (million USD) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
2008 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | ||
1 | TSMC | Taiwan | 10,556 | 9,813 | 9,748 |
2 | UMC | Taiwan | 3,400 | 3,755 | 3,670 |
3 | Chartered | Singapore | 1,743 | 1,458 | 1,527 |
4 | SMIC | China | 1,354 | 1,550 | 1,465 |
5 | Vanguard | Taiwan | 511 | 486 | 398 |
6 | Dongbu | South Korea | 490 | 510 | 456 |
7 | X-Fab | Germany | 400 | 410 | 290 |
8 | HHNEC | China | 350 | 335 | 315 |
9 | HeJian | China | 345 | 330 | 290 |
10 | SSMC | Singapore | 340 | 350 | 325 |
11 | Grace | China | 335 | 310 | 227 |
12 | Tower Semiconductor | Israel | 252 | 231 | 187 |
13 | Jazz Semiconductor | United States | 190 | 182 | 213 |
14 | Silterra | Malaysia | 175 | 180 | 155 |
15 | ASMC | China | 149 | 155 | 170 |
16 | Polar Semiconductor | Japan | 110 | 105 | 95 |
17 | Mosel-Vitelic | Taiwan | 100 | 105 | 155 |
18 | CR Micro (1) | China | - | 143 | 114 |
Others | 140 | 167 | 180 | ||
Total | 20,980 | 20,575 | 19,940 |
(1) Merged with CR Logic in 2008, reclassified as an IDM foundry
2007–2005
As of 2007, the top 14 semiconductor foundries include:[21]
Rank | Company | Foundry type | Country/Territory of origin | Revenue (million USD) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | |||
1 | TSMC | Pure-Play | Taiwan | 9,813 | 9,748 | 8,217 |
2 | UMC | Pure-Play | Taiwan | 3,755 | 3,670 | 3,259 |
3 | SMIC | Pure-Play | China | 1,550 | 1,465 | 1,171 |
4 | Chartered | Pure-Play | Singapore | 1,458 | 1,527 | 1,132 |
5 | Texas Instruments | IDM | United States | 610 | 585 | 540 |
6 | IBM | IDM | United States | 570 | 600 | 665 |
7 | Dongbu | Pure-Play | South Korea | 510 | 456 | 347 |
8 | Vanguard | Pure-Play | Taiwan | 486 | 398 | 353 |
9 | X-Fab | Pure-Play | Germany | 410 | 290 | 202 |
10 | Samsung | IDM | South Korea | 385 | 75 | - |
11 | SSMC | Pure-Play | Singapore | 350 | 325 | 280 |
12 | HHNEC | Pure-Play | China | 335 | 315 | 313 |
13 | HeJian | Pure-Play | China | 330 | 290 | 250 |
14 | MagnaChip | IDM | South Korea | 322 | 342 | 345 |
For ranking in worldwide:[22]
Rank | Company | Country/Territory of origin | Revenue (million USD) | 2006/2005 changes | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2006 | 2005 | 2006 | 2005 | |||
6 | 7 | TSMC | Taiwan | 9,748 | 8,217 | +19% |
21 | 22 | UMC | Taiwan | 3,670 | 3,259 | +13% |
Financial and IP issues
Like all industries, the semiconductor industry faces upcoming challenges and obstacles.
The cost to stay on the leading edge has steadily increased with each generation of chips. The financial strain is being felt by both large merchant foundries and their fabless customers. The cost of a new foundry exceeds $1 billion. These costs must be passed on to customers. Many merchant foundries have entered into joint ventures with their competitors in an effort to split research and design expenditures and fab-maintenance expenses.
Chip design companies sometimes avoid other companies' patents simply by purchasing the products from a licensed foundry with broad cross-license agreements with the patent owner.[23]
Stolen design data is also a concern; data is rarely directly copied, because blatant copies are easily identified by distinctive features in the chip,[24] placed there either for this purpose or as a byproduct of the design process. However, the data including any procedure, process system, method of operation or concept may be sold to a competitor, who may save months or years of tedious reverse engineering.
See also
References
- M. Liu (14 May 2021). "Taiwan and the foundry model". Nature Electronics. 4 (5): 318–320. doi:10.1038/s41928-021-00576-y.
- S. K. Saha (25–27 June 2012). "The Role of Semiconductor Foundries in Advanced Integrated Circuit Product Development". International Technology Management Conference. pp. 32–35. doi:10.1109/ITMC.2012.6306393. ISBN 978-1-4673-2134-1. S2CID 7329163.
- F. C. Tseng (8–11 December 1996). "Foundry Technologies". International Electron Devices Meeting. Technical Digest. pp. 19–24. doi:10.1109/iedm.1996.553030. ISBN 0-7803-3393-4. S2CID 40610229.
- J.Y.-C. Sun (1998). Burnett, David; Wristers, Dirk; Tsuchiya, Toshiaki (eds.). "Foundry Technology Trend". Proceedings of SPIE. Microelectronic Device Technology II. 3506: 19–24. Bibcode:1998SPIE.3506...19S. doi:10.1117/12.323970. S2CID 173181521.
- "Company Profile". TSMC. Retrieved 6 December 2020.
- Brown, Clair; Linden, Greg (2011). Chips and change : how crisis reshapes the semiconductor industry (1st ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press. ISBN 9780262516822.
- Suzanne Berger; Richard K. Lester (12 February 2015). Global Taiwan: Building Competitive Strengths in a New International Economy. Routledge. pp. 142–. ISBN 978-1-317-46970-4.
- Hitoshi Hirakawa; Kaushalesh Lal; Shinkai Naoko (2013). Servitization, IT-ization and Innovation Models: Two-stage Industrial Cluster Theory. Routledge. pp. 34–. ISBN 978-0-415-63945-3.
- "Pure-Play Foundry Market On Pace For Strongest Growth Since 2014". EPS News. 22 September 2020. Retrieved 6 January 2021.
- "Press Center – TrendForce Reports Top 10 Ranking of Global Semiconductor Foundries of 2017, TSMC Ranks First with Market Share of 55.9% | TrendForce – Market research, price trend of DRAM, NAND Flash, LEDs, TFT-LCD and green energy, PV". TrendForce. Retrieved 1 July 2020.
- McGrath, Dylan (23 January 2017). "X-Fab is Fastest Growing Foundry". EE Times. Archived from the original on 29 January 2017. Retrieved 10 May 2017.
- Clarke, Peter (16 January 2017). "SMIC, Tower, X-Fab are strongest growing pure-play foundries". eeNews Analog. Retrieved 29 January 2021.
- "RBK Data base of companies". rbc.ru. Retrieved 20 February 2018.
- "United States dollar (USD) and Russian ruble (RUB) Year 2014 Exchange Rate History". Retrieved 20 February 2018.
- IC Insights: Top 13 Foundries Account for 91% of Total Foundry Sales in 2013
- "Ruselectronics to triple revenues by 2020".
- semimd.com: 2011 Major IC Foundries Archived 26 May 2013 at the Wayback Machine.
- dongbuhitek.com: 2010 Foundry Ranking (citing Gartner) (PDF).
- IC Insights, "2009 Major IC Foundries" March 2009.
- IC Insights, "Leading Pure-Play Foundry Companies" March 2009 Archived 19 July 2011 at the Wayback Machine.
- IC Insights, "2007 Major IC Foundries".
- IC Insights, "Worldwide 2006 Top 25 Semiconductor Sales Leaders".
- R. H. Abramson (28 February – 4 March 1994). "When the chickens come home to roost: The licensed foundry defense in patent cases". Proceedings of COMPCON '94. pp. 348–354. doi:10.1109/CMPCON.1994.282907. ISBN 978-0-8186-5380-3. S2CID 2957002.
- Carol Marsh and Tom Kean. "A Security Tagging Scheme for ASIC Designs and Intellectual Property Cores". Design & Reuse.