Rustock botnet

The Rustock botnet was a botnet that operated from around 2006[1] until March 2011.

It consisted of computers running Microsoft Windows, and was capable of sending up to 25,000 spam messages per hour from an infected PC.[2][3] At the height of its activities, it sent an average of 192 spam messages per compromised machine per minute.[4] Reported estimates on its size vary greatly across different sources, with claims that the botnet may have comprised anywhere between 150,000 and 2,400,000 machines.[5][6][7] The size of the botnet was increased and maintained mostly through self-propagation, where the botnet sent many malicious e-mails intended to infect machines opening them with a trojan which would incorporate the machine into the botnet.[8]

The botnet took a hit after the 2008 takedown of McColo, an ISP which was responsible for hosting most of the botnet's command and control servers. McColo regained Internet connectivity for several hours, and in those hours up to 15 Mbit a second of traffic was observed, likely indicating a transfer of command and control to Russia.[9] While these actions temporarily reduced global spam levels by around 75%, the effect did not last long: spam levels increased by 60% between January and June 2009, 40% of which was attributed to the Rustock botnet.[10][11]

On March 16, 2011, the botnet was taken down through what was initially reported as a coordinated effort by Internet service providers and software vendors.[12] It was revealed the next day that the take-down, called Operation b107,[13][14] was the action of Microsoft, U.S. federal law enforcement agents, FireEye, and the University of Washington.[15][16]

To capture the individuals involved with the Rustock botnet, on July 18, 2011, Microsoft is offering "a monetary reward in the amount of US$250,000 for new information that results in the identification, arrest and criminal conviction of such individual(s)."[17]

Operations

Botnets are composed of infected computers used by unwitting Internet users. In order to hide its presence from the user and anti-virus software, the Rustock botnet employed rootkit technology. Once a computer was infected, it would seek contact with command-and-control servers at a number of IP addresses and any of 2,500 domains and backup domains[18] that may direct the zombies in the botnet to perform various tasks such as sending spam or executing distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks.[19] Ninety-six servers were in operation at the time of the takedown.[20] When sending spam the botnet uses TLS encryption in around 35 percent of the cases as an extra layer of protection to hide its presence. Whether detected or not, this creates additional overhead for the mail servers handling the spam. Some experts pointed out that this extra load could negatively impact the mail infrastructure of the Internet, as most of the e-mails sent these days are spam.[21]

See also

References
  1. Chuck Miller (2008-07-25). "The Rustock botnet spams again". SC Magazine US. Archived from the original on 2012-07-30. Retrieved 2010-04-21.
  2. "Real Viagra sales power global spam flood - Techworld.com". News.techworld.com. Archived from the original on 2012-04-07. Retrieved 2010-04-21.
  3. "Marshal8e6 Releases New Insight and Analysis into Botnets". trustwave.com. Chicago, IL, USA: Trustwave Holdings. 2009-04-22. Archived from the original on 2016-04-20. Retrieved 2014-01-09.
  4. "Symantec Announces August 2010 MessageLabs Intelligence Report". symantec.com. Sunnyvale, CA, USA: Symantec. 2010-08-24. Retrieved 2014-01-09.
  5. "MessageLabs intelligence" (PDF). MessageLabs. April 2010. Retrieved 20 November 2010.
  6. "Biggest spammer? The Rustock botnet |". Securityinfowatch.com. 2009-02-06. Archived from the original on 2020-06-18. Retrieved 2010-04-21.
  7. "Rustock botnet responsible for 40 percent of spam". Good Gear Guide. Retrieved August 25, 2010.
  8. "New Rustock Botnet Trying to Expand Itself". SPAMfighter. 2008-07-25. Retrieved 2010-04-21.
  9. "Dead network provider arms Rustock botnet from the hereafter - McColo dials Russia as world sleeps". The Register. 18 November 2008. Retrieved 20 November 2010.
  10. "Rustock botnet leads spam surge up 60 percent in 2009". MX Logic. 2009-07-14. Retrieved 2010-04-21.
  11. "Grum and Rustock botnets drive spam to new levels > Botnet > Vulnerabilities & Exploits > News > SC Magazine Australia/NZ". securecomputing.net.au. 2010-03-02. Retrieved 2010-04-21.
  12. Hickins, Michael (2011-03-17). "Prolific Spam Network Is Unplugged". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2011-03-17.
  13. Williams, Jeff. "Operation b107 - Rustock Botnet Takedown". Retrieved 2011-03-27.
  14. Bright, Peter (22 March 2011). "How Operation b107 decapitated the Rustock botnet". Ars Technica. Retrieved 2011-03-27.
  15. Wingfield, Nick (2011-03-18). "Spam Network Shut Down". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved 2011-03-18.
  16. Williams, Jeff. "Operation b107 - Rustock Botnet Takedown". Retrieved 2011-04-06.
  17. "Microsoft Offers Reward for Information on Rustock". Retrieved 2011-07-18.
  18. Microsoft Amended Application for Temporary Restraining Order. Case 11CV00222, US Fed. Ct. W.D. Wash., Feb 28 2011
  19. Prince, Brian (2009-07-28). "Security: A Day in the Life of the Rustock Botnet". EWeek. Retrieved 20 November 2010.
  20. "Spammers sought after botnet takedown". BBC News. 2011-03-25.
  21. "Beware Botnet's Return, Security Firms Warn". PCWorld. 2010-03-28. Retrieved 2010-04-21.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.