PRISM (reactor)

PRISM (Power Reactor Innovative Small Module, sometimes S-PRISM from SuperPRISM) is a nuclear power plant design by GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy (GEH).

Drawing of the PRISM Reactor

Design

The S-PRISM represents GEH's Generation IV reactor solution to closing the nuclear fuel cycle and is also part of its Advanced Recycling Center (ARC) proposition[1] to U.S. Congress to deal with nuclear waste.[2] S-PRISM is a commercial implementation of the Integral Fast Reactor developed by Argonne National Laboratory between 1984 and 1994.

It is a sodium-cooled fast breeder reactor, based on the Experimental Breeder Reactor II (EBR-II) design, scaled up by a factor of ten.[3]

The design utilizes reactor modules, each having a power output of 311 MWe, to enable factory fabrication at low cost.

In an identical fashion to the EBR-II that it is based on, the reactor would transition to a much lower power level whenever temperatures rise significantly, moreover the reactor vessel modules are pool type, as opposed to loop type, with the pool conferring substantial thermal inertia and the final key safety feature includes a "RVACS", which is a passive reactor vessel air cooling system to remove decay heat. These safety systems are passive and therefore always operate and are to prevent core damage when no other means of heat removal are available.[4]

As of 2022, the PRISM design is not under active consideration.

History

Integral fast reactor
Main article: Integral fast reactor

The integral fast reactor was developed at the West Campus of the Argonne National Laboratory in Idaho Falls, Idaho and was an extension (inc fuel reprocessing) to the Experimental Breeder Reactor II, which achieved first criticality in 1965 and ran for 30 years. The Integral Fast Reactor project (and EBR II) was shut down by the U.S. Congress in 1994. GEH continued work on the concept until 2001.[3]

Possible US demonstration reactor

In October 2010, GEH signed a memorandum of understanding with the operators of the Department of Energy's (DOE) Savannah River site, which should allow the construction of a demonstration reactor prior to the design receiving full NRC licensing approval.[5]

UK interest in PRISM - 2012

In October 2011, The Independent reported that the UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) and senior advisers within the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) had asked for technical and financial details of the PRISM, partly as a means of reducing the country's plutonium stockpile.[6] In July 2012, GEH submitted a feasibility report to the NDA showing that the PRISM could provide a cost-effective way of quickly dealing with the UK's plutonium stockpile. The feasibility report includes an assessment from the consultancy firm DBD Limited suggesting there are "no fundamental impediment(s)" to the licensing of the PRISM in the UK.[7][8] A 2012 Guardian article pointed out that a new generation of fast reactors such as the PRISM "could dispose of the waste problem, reducing the threat of radiation and nuclear proliferation, and at the same time generate vast amounts of low-carbon energy". David J. C. MacKay, chief scientist at the DECC, was quoted as saying that British plutonium contains enough energy to run the country's electricity grid for 500 years.[9] Recent announcements of planned expansion of nuclear power in the UK have made no reference to PRISM. [10]

Possible role in the Versatile Test Reactor program

In 2018 PRISM was selected by Battelle Energy Alliance to support the DOE decision making on the Versatile Test Reactor (VTR) program.[11] In February 2019, DOE expected to complete the initial stage of deciding whether to proceed with the VTR within a few weeks.[12] The VTR program was scrapped in 2022.[13]

See also

References
  1. Testimony to the U.S. Congress: Full Committee Hearing - Advancing Technology for Nuclear Fuel Recycling: What Should Our Research, Development and Demonstration Strategy Be?
  2. GE Energy press release. June 18, 2009
  3. Stuart Nathan (13 May 2013). "Prism project: A proposal for the UK's problem plutonium". The Engineer. Retrieved 29 November 2013.
  4. Van Tuyle, G.J.; Slovik, G.C.; Chan, B.C.; Kennett, R.J.; Cheng, H.S.; Kroeger, P.G. (1989). "Technical Report: Summary of advanced LMR (Liquid Metal Reactor) evaluations: PRISM (Power Reactor Inherently Safe Module) and SAFR (Sodium Advanced Fast Reactor). DOI: 10.2172/5491968". doi:10.2172/5491968. OSTI 5491968. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  5. "Prototype Prism proposed for Savannah River". World Nuclear News. 2010-10-28. Retrieved 2010-11-04.
  6. Connor, Steve (2011-10-28). "New life for old idea that could dissolve our nuclear waste". The Independent. London. Archived from the original on 2022-05-24. Retrieved 2011-10-30.
  7. Clark, Duncan (2012-07-09). "Nuclear waste-burning reactor moves a step closer to reality". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 2012-07-12.
  8. "World's first nuclear waste-burning PRISM reactor moves a step closer in the UK". Mark Lynas. 2012-07-09. Retrieved 2012-07-12.
  9. Pearce, Fred (2012-07-30). "Are fast-breeder reactors the answer to our nuclear waste nightmare?". The Guardian. London.
  10. "Johnson looks to boost UK nuclear capacity". World Nuclear News. 22 March 2022.
  11. "GE Hitachi and PRISM Selected for U.S. Department of Energy's Versatile Test Reactor Program". GE Newsroom. General Electric. November 13, 2018. Retrieved 27 May 2019.
  12. Toth, Jacqueline (February 11, 2019). "DOE Nearing Decision Checkpoint on Versatile Test Reactor". Morning Consult. Retrieved 27 May 2019.
  13. "DOE's Versatile Test Reactor (VTR) Project Terminated in Omnibus Spending Bill". 7 March 2022.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.