S v Williams (1995)

S v Williams and Others is a decision of the Constitutional Court of South Africa in which the court ruled that judicial corporal punishment of juveniles is unconstitutional.[1] The decision was taken with respect to five different cases in which six juveniles were convicted by different magistrates and sentenced to receive a "moderate correction" of a number of strokes with a light cane.

Not to be confused with S v Williams.

S v Williams
CourtConstitutional Court of South Africa
Full case nameState v Williams and Others
Decided9 June 1995 (1995-06-09)
Citation(s)[1995] ZACC 6, 1995 (3) SA 632 (CC), 1995 (7) BCLR 861 (CC)
Case history
Prior action(s)Referral from Cape Provincial Division
Court membership
Judges sittingChaskalson P, Ackermann, Didcott, Kriegler, Langa, Madala, Mahomed, Mokgoro, O'Regan & Sachs JJ, Kentridge AJ
Case opinions
Decision byLanga
Part of a series on
Corporal punishment
By place
By implementation
By country
Court cases
Politics
Campaigns against corporal punishment

The unanimous judgment, handed down on 9 June 1995, found the imposition of corporal punishment to be incompatible with the Interim Constitution of South Africa because it violates the right to human dignity and the protection against cruel, inhuman or degrading punishment.[2]

The case did not deal with judicial corporal punishment of adults, but in argument before the court all parties agreed that it was unconstitutional. In 1997 Parliament passed the Abolition of Corporal Punishment Act, which repealed all laws allowing for judicial corporal punishment.

References
  1. "Section 13: The abolition of JCP". Judicial Corporal Punishment in South Africa. World Corporal Punishment Research. 2005. Retrieved 15 October 2012.
  2. Angus, Laurel (1996). "Case Report: S v Williams". South African Journal on Human Rights. 12: 142–145.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.