Sinuri

Alongside Labraunda and Amyzon, Sinuri was one of three rural highland sanctuaries which benefited from extensive patronage by the Hecatomnids who ruled Caria as satraps in the 4th century BCE.[9][1] The sanctuary was enlarged and rebuilt on terraces, obscuring the previous Archaic entrance, and a new temenos wall was built.[1] An inscription records the dedication of a new altar by Hecatomnus (r.392–377 BCE) himself.[7][1] Inscribed decrees in both Carian and Greek show that Idrieus and Ada (r.315–344 BCE) intervened in the governance of the sanctuary.[7][10][11][12]

Sinuri remained an important religious centre after the Macedonian conquest of Asia Minor. In the 290s BCE, Sinuri was governed by the Macedonian dynast Pleistarchus as part of his territory in northern Caria alongside Heraclea at Latmus and Hyllarima.[13] An inscribed decree of Pleistarchus' admits an outsider into the governing syngeneia of Pormounos.[7] A break in the epigraphic record of Sinuri in the early 3rd century BCE suggests that the site was contested between Pleistarchus and Ptolemaic southern Caria in this time. Alongside Mylasa, it was most likely governed by Ptolemy II from the start of his reign in 282 BCE.[14]

Sinrui lay on the frontier between the major poleis of Mylasa and Stratonicea from the time of the latter's foundation by the Seleucids in the 260s BCE.[1] Like nearby Kasossos, it was absorbed into the growing polis of Mylasa in the Hellenistic period. Sinuri remained a prominent sanctuary but the governing synegeneia of Pormoonous became a constituent part of Mylasa. This process occurred by the time Olympichos, alternately a client of Seleucus II and Philip V, ruled Caria from Alinda in the late 3rd century BCE.[15] Accordingly, the majority of inscriptions from Sinuri record their eponymous magistrate as being the stephanephoros of Mylasa.[14] From the 1st century BCE, priests of Sinuri could belong to other Mylasan syngeneiai than that of Pormoonous. Priests served for life; while the priesthood may have been hereditary in earlier years, it could probably be bought and sold by the late 1st century BCE.[2]

Caria was contested in the 3rd century between Antigonid, Seleucid, Ptolemaic, Rhodian and Pergamene interests. A fragmentary inscribed letter from Antiochus III to the community at Sinuri shows that his military campaign of 203 BCE reached Sinuri, although Sinuri received nominal independence from the conquering governor Zeuxis as part of Mylasa.[15] Macedonian interests in Caria were ended with the Treaty of Apamea in 188 BCE, confirming Rhodian rule with Roman support. Mylasa recovered its free city status, with tax exemptions, under the Rhodians as previously under the Seleucids; this seemingly encouraged economic activity at the sacred lands of Sinuri.[14]

Sinuri remained an important religious centre, still dependent on Mylasa, after being incorporated into Roman Asia. The epigraphic record at Sinuri stops abruptly in the second half of the 1st century BCE. The sanctuary may have been destroyed by Quintus Labienus when he sacked Mylasa in 40 BCE.[14]

A small Byzantine basilica from the 5th or 6th centuries CE shows that religious activity continued at Sinuri, albeit on a much smaller scale, even after Christianisation.[16]

Two inscriptions in the Carian language are known from Sinuri. These use a distinctive local variant of the Carian alphabet, most closely related to that of Kildara.[19][20][21] Although Louis Robert claimed to have found (but not published) a third Carian inscription from Sinuri, Wolfgang Blümel has since confirmed that this was originally a Greek text which had been erased in antiquity.[7][22] Nonetheless, the length and content of the known inscriptions make Sinuri one of the most remarkable find-sites of Carian language material in Anatolia.

The fragmentary inscription known as C.Si 2 records part of two decrees in both Greek and Carian issued by the Hecatomnid satraps and sibling-spouses Idrieus and Ada. The dynasts' names are recorded as 'Idrieus (son) of Hecatomnus and Ada (daughter) of Hecatomnus', [id]ryin k̂tmñoś sb ada k̂tmñoś ([𐤧𐊢]𐋈𐤧𐊵 𐊴𐊭𐊪𐊳𐊫𐊸 𐊰𐊩 𐊠𐊢𐊠 𐊴𐊭𐊪𐊳𐊫𐊸). Interpretation of the Carian-language decrees is disputed. It apparently refers to Ponmoounnean (i.e. a member of the governing syngeneia of Ponmoonnous/Pormounous). The Carian word pñmnn-śñ (𐊷𐊳𐊪𐊵𐊵𐊸𐊳) is an accusativus genitivi, forming an accusative singular in -ñ on an original possessive adjective in -ś. The decree may have conveyed the privilege of freedom of taxation (ateleia) to an individual.[10][11][12][20][23] Regardless of the precise content, this inscription is unique in showing that the Hecatomnids issued laws in Carian as well as in Greek.[24]

The other Carian inscription from Sinuri, known as C.Si 1, is much shorter and may be funerary.[20] Because no other Carian inscriptions are known from the site, and Greek inscriptions are so much more numerous, it is likely that Greek became the dominant language of the community at Sinuri by the end of the 4th century BCE. An inscribed list of priests from the 2nd century BCE records Greek names in the two most recent columns and indigenous, Carian names only in the first column, suggesting that naming practices had changed with the spoken language in the early Hellenistic period.[25]

A large proportion of surviving Greek-language inscriptions concern sacred lands owned by the god Sinuri and his priesthood. Many of these are lease documents. Land sold to the god was then permanently leased back to the original owner and his descendants, who paid rent in cash and olive oil to the sanctuary. This arrangement was common in central Caria in the Hellenistic period and hundreds of similar documents survive from nearby Mylasa, Olymos, and Euromos. Consequently, not all the land owned by Sinuri was contiguous, and this dispersal of territory may have facilitated the sanctuary's integration into Mylasa.[26][14][1]