Bloop

Bloop was an ultra-low-frequency, high amplitude underwater sound detected by the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in 1997.[1] By 2012, earlier speculation that the sound originated from a marine animal[2] was replaced by NOAA's description of the sound as being consistent with noises generated via non-tectonic cryoseisms originating from glacial movements such as ice calving, or through seabed gouging by ice.[1][3][4]

For other uses, see Bloop (disambiguation).
A spectrogram of Bloop

Sound profile

The sound's source was roughly triangulated to 50°S 100°W, a remote point in the south Pacific Ocean west of the southern tip of South America. The sound was detected by the Equatorial Pacific Ocean autonomous hydrophone array,[1] a system of hydrophones primarily used to monitor undersea seismicity, ice noise, and marine mammal population and migration.[5]: 284  This is a stand-alone system designed and built by NOAA's Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory (PMEL) to augment NOAA's use of the U.S. Navy Sound Surveillance System (SOSUS), which was equipment originally designed to detect Soviet submarines.[5]: 255–256 

According to the NOAA description, the sound "rose" in frequency over about one minute and was of sufficient amplitude to be heard on multiple sensors, at a range of over 5,000 km (3,000 mi).

Ice quake origin

The NOAA Vents Program has attributed the sound to that of a large cryoseism (also known as an ice quake).[4] Numerous ice quakes share similar spectrograms with Bloop, as well as the amplitude necessary to detect them despite ranges exceeding 5,000 km (3,000 mi). This was found during the tracking of iceberg A53a as it disintegrated near South Georgia Island in early 2008. The iceberg(s) involved in generating the sound were most likely between Bransfield Straits and the Ross Sea; or possibly at Cape Adare, a well-known source of cryogenic signals.[1] Sounds generated by ice quakes are easily determined through the use of hydrophones since sea water, an excellent sound channel, allows the ambient sounds generated through ice activities to travel great distances.[6]: 5 

Ice calving

In ice calving, variations result from a sound source's own motion.[6]: 55  As oceanographer Yunbo Xie explains, the alteration of waveforms from a detected sound "can also be caused by so-called angular frequency dependent radiation patterns associated with antisymmetric mode motion of the ice cover."[6]: 59 

Rubbing and ridging events within an ice floe

Two processes known as rubbing and ridging are responsible for acoustical emissions similar to those from ice calving.[7] Rubbing involves two or more areas of compacted glacial ice floes which are being forced together, inducing shear deformation at its edges and triggering horizontally-polarized shear waves, i. e. SH waves.[6]: 137  Ridging occurs when that ice bends or slides at the ridges.[6]: 121  According to Xie, both events will produce sound in the failure sequence (breakup) of an ice floe:

"A wave equation resulting from shear deformation will be defined in an ice floe with the rubbing effect coupled to the floe through its boundary with the adjacent ice,"[6]: 137  while "ridging deformation(s) revealed by this event indicate that the failure process is associated with a crushing process that seals air or vacuous gaps between ice floes. The acoustical signals emitted by this failure process are similar to those emitted from a collapsing air bubble in a fluid."[6]: 121 

Animal origin

NOAA's Christopher Fox, in an interview with CNN in 2001, stated that he believed Bloop to be ice calving in Antarctica.[8] In 2002, Fox was interviewed by David Wolman for an article in New Scientist, where he stated that he did not believe its origin was man-made, such as a submarine or bomb. Fox also stated that while the audio profile of Bloop does resemble that of a living creature,[2] the source was a mystery because it would be "far more powerful than the calls made by any animal on Earth."[9] Wolman reported in his article the following:

Fox's hunch is that the sound nicknamed Bloop is the most likely (out of the other recorded unidentified sounds) to come from some sort of animal, because its signature is a rapid variation in frequency similar to that of sounds known to be made by marine beasts. There's one crucial difference, however: in 1997 Bloop was detected by sensors up to 4,800 km (3,000 mi) apart. That means it must be far louder than any whale noise, or any other animal noise for that matter. Is it even remotely possible that some creature bigger than any whale is lurking in the ocean depths? Or, perhaps more likely, something that is much more efficient at making sound?[10]: 174–175 

— David Wolman

According to author Philip Hayward, Wolman's speculations "amplified Fox's 'hunch' and—through the use of the word 'likely'—opened the door for subsequent speculation as to what such an 'efficient' noise-making entity might be. Over the last decade consensus has, in fact, supported the argument that the noise is produced by ice fracturing processes."[10]: 175 

See also

References
  1. "Acoustics Monitoring Program – Icequakes (Bloop)". NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration / United States Department of Commerce. Archived from the original on February 25, 2020. Retrieved August 28, 2017.
  2. David Wolman (June 15, 2002). "Calls from the deep". New Scientist. Archived from the original on January 6, 2013. Retrieved January 16, 2012.
  3. Steadman, Ian (November 29, 2012). "The Bloop Mystery Has Been Solved: It Was Never A Giant Sea Monster". WIRED UK. Conde Nast Publications.
  4. US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (June 25, 2018). "What is the Bloop?". oceanservice.noaa.gov. Archived from the original on May 7, 2019.
  5. Di Mento, John Mark (December 2006). "Environmental Challenges to Post-Cold War Naval Operations: The Browning of the Blue Water Battlespace". Beyond the Water's Edge: United States National Security & the Ocean Environment (Ph.D. thesis). Medford, MA: Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University. Document No. 3262885 ProQuest 304741876 – via ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
  6. Xie, Yunbo (1991). An Acoustical Study of the Properties and Behaviour of Sea Ice (Ph.D. thesis). Vancouver, B.C.: University of British Columbia. doi:10.14288/1.0053256. Document No. NN69775 – via ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.open access
  7. Pettit, Erin C. (2012). "Passive Underwater Acoustic Evolution of a Calving Event". Annals of Glaciology. 53 (60): 113–122. Bibcode:2012AnGla..53..113P. doi:10.3189/2012aog60a137.
  8. "Scientists tune in to sounds of the sea". CNN. September 7, 2001. Retrieved January 16, 2012.
  9. "Tuning in to a deep sea monster". CNN.com. June 13, 2002.
  10. Hayward, Philip (2017). Making a Splash: Mermaids (and Mer-Men) in 20th and 21st Century Audiovisual Media. Indiana University Press. ISBN 9780861969258. OCLC 1020857723.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.