OPCW Fact-Finding Mission in Syria

On 16 June 2014 the mission published its first summary report (S/1191/2014), covering the period from 3 to 31 May 2014.[2] Its second report (S/1212/2014)[6] was circulated to States Parties on 10 September 2014.[7] Its third report (S/1230/2014) was dated 18 December 2014.[8]

During its first visit in Syria, the mission attempted on May 27 to conduct one field visit to Kafr Zita, in Hama Governorate, held by the opposition, where chlorine gas was allegedly used for an attack on May 19, departing from government held Homs. It aborted the mission after its "leading vehicle was struck by an improvised explosive device", another vehicle was "attacked with automatic gun fire" and "the remaining two vehicles were intercepted by armed gunmen and members of the team detained for some time." The mission interviewed between 25 August and 5 September, in a safe location out of Syria, 37 witness of chlorine attacks of the villages of Talmenes, in Idlib Governorate, on 21 and 24 April 2014, Al-Tamanah, in Idlib Governorate, on 12, 18 and 30 April, 22 and 25 May 2014, and Kafr Zita, which suffered 14 attacks between 10 April and 30 August 2014) The third report presented the conclusions and evidence obtained from the interviewees. It estimates that those attacks were made with barrel bombs thrown from helicopters which killed 13 people — 3 in Talmenes, 8 in Al-Tamanah, and 2 in Kafr Zita.

A further three missions were initiated by OPCW in 2015, which were headed by different personnel and the reports passed through Ban Ki-Moon by Ahmet Üzümcü to the President of the Security Council in November 2015 (S/2015/908). The reports (S/1318/2015, S/1319/2015, and S/1320/2015, all dated 29 October 2015) were titled "Interim report of the OPCW Fact-Finding Mission in Syria regarding the incidents described in communications from the Deputy Minister for Foreign Affairs and Expatriates and the Head of the National Authority of the Syrian Arab Republic from 15 December 2014 to 15 June 2015", led by Steven Wallis, "Report of the OPCW Fact-Finding Mission in Syria Regarding Alleged Incidents in the Idlib Governorate of the Syrian Arab Republic between 16 March and 20 May 2015", dated 20 October 2015 led by Leonard Phillips and "Report of the OPCW fact-finding mission in Syria regarding alleged incidents in Marea, Syrian Arab Republic August 2015".[9]

In early 2015 the mission disclosed previously undeclared traces of sarin and VX precursor compounds in a Syrian government military research site, the Scientific Studies and Research Centre, where use of those compounds had not been previously declared.[10][11]

The OPCW expressed "serious concern" over the Khan Shaykhun chemical attack and said that its Fact-Finding Mission in Syria was "gathering and analysing information from all available sources."[12] The following day, the Technical Secretariat of the OPCW, referring to the media reports, requested all member states of the Chemical Weapons Convention to share available information on what it described preliminary as "allegations of use of chemical weapons in the Khan Shaykhun area of Idlib province in the Syrian Arab Republic."[13]

The OPCW declared on 19 April that lab results "indicate that the victims were exposed to sarin or a sarin-like substance."[14]

A chemical attack on Douma took place on 7 April 2018 that killed at least 49 civilians with scores injured, and which has been blamed on the Assad government.[15][16] On 10 April, the Syrian and Russian governments invited the OPCW to send a team to investigate the attacks.[17][18] The investigators arrived in Damascus on April 14,[19] but were blocked from entering Douma, saying they can not guarantee their safety.[20][21] Under the evacuation agreement for Ghouta, the Syrian military were unable to enter Douma, so Russian Military Police assisted the OPCW mission.[22] Concerns were also raised by US ambassador Kenneth D. Ward that Russia was trying to conceal the evidence, and that Russia had tampered with the site of the attack to thwart the OPCW fact finding mission; Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov denied any tampering had occurred.[21]

On 17 April, the OPCW was promised access to the site, but had not entered Douma[23] and was unable to carry out the inspection because their teams came under fire during a reconnaissance to visit sites of the chemical weapons attack. According to the OPCW director, “On arrival at site one, a large crowd gathered and the advice provided by the UNDSS was that the reconnaissance team should withdraw,” and “at site two, the team came under small arms fire and an explosive was detonated. The reconnaissance team returned to Damascus”, and at the site "the incident reportedly resulted in two fatalities and an injury to a Russian soldier." Following that incident, several security measures were increased, and during the next visits the investigation team could work undisturbed.[24][22][25]

On 21 April, the OPCW Fact-Finding Mission visited a site in Douma to collect samples, and on 25 April visited a second site in Douma to collect further samples. The team also interviewed people related to incident in Damascus.[26] On 4 May the OPCW announced that the initial deployment of the Fact-Finding Mission in Douma was complete, but that analysis of the samples would take at least three to four weeks.[27] An interim report in July 2018 concluded that no evidence of nerve agents were found but that chlorinated organic agents were, and that further analysis was required to establish the provenance of a gas cylinder on the roof of the building hit in the strike.[28]

The FFM in its final report in March 2019 concluded that the evaluation and analysis of all the information gathered by the FFM provide reasonable grounds that the use of a toxic chemical as a weapon took place and that the chemical agent used was molecular chlorine.[29][30]

In November 2018, the committee voted for the 2019 Budget to inspect the situation of chemical weapons in the Syrian Arab Republic.[31] The resolution passed with 99 in favor and 27 against.

In favour (99)	Abstaining (18)	Against (27)	Absent (9)
Albania  Andorra  Argentina  Australia  Austria  Bahrain  Bangladesh  Barbados  Belgium  Benin  Bhutan  Botswana  Brunei  Bulgaria  Cameroon  Canada  Chile  Colombia  Costa Rica  Croatia  Cyprus  Czech Republic  Denmark  Dominican Republic  Estonia  Fiji  Finland  France  Georgia  Germany  Greece  Ghana  Guyana  Holy See  Honduras  Hungary  Iceland  Indonesia  Ireland  Italy  Ivory Coast  Jamaica  Japan  Kenya  Kuwait  Latvia  Liberia  Libya  Liechtenstein  Lithuania  Luxembourg  Macedonia  Malawi  Malta  Mexico  Monaco  Moldova  Montenegro  Morocco  Netherlands  New Zealand  Nigeria  Norway  Oman  Panama  Papua New Guinea  Paraguay  Peru  Poland  Portugal  Qatar  Romania  Saint Kitts and Nevis  Saint Lucia  Samoa  San Marino  Saudi Arabia  Senegal  Seychelles  Singapore  Slovakia  Slovenia  Solomon Islands  South Korea  Spain  Sweden   Switzerland  Thailand  Togo  Tonga  Turkey  Ukraine  United Arab Emirates  United Kingdom  United States  Uruguay  Vanuatu  Vietnam	Afghanistan  Algeria  Bosnia and Herzegovina  Brazil  Burkina Faso  Ecuador  El Salvador  Ethiopia  India  Iraq  Jordan  Malaysia  Mongolia    Nepal  Philippines  Sri Lanka  Suriname  Uganda	Angola  Armenia  Belarus  Bolivia  Burundi  China  Congo  Comoros  Cuba  Guatemala  Iran  Kazakhstan  Kyrgyzstan  Laos  Mozambique  Myanmar  Nicaragua  Pakistan  Palestine  Russia  South Africa  Sudan  Syria  Tajikistan  Uzbekistan  Venezuela  Zimbabwe	Azerbaijan  Democratic Republic of the Congo  Madagascar  Mauritius  Rwanda  Serbia  Swaziland  Turkmenistan  Zambia

• Use of chemical weapons in the Syrian civil war
• Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Syrian Arab Republic
• United Nations Mission to Investigate Alleged Uses of Chemical Weapons in the Syrian Arab Republic (2013)
• OPCW-UN Joint Investigative Mechanism (2015-2016)