Transformation efficiency

Transformation efficiency refers to the ability of a cell to take up and incorporate exogenous DNA, such as plasmids, during a process called transformation. The efficiency of transformation is typically measured as the number of transformants (cells that have taken up the exogenous DNA) per microgram of DNA added to the cells. A higher transformation efficiency means that more cells are able to take up the DNA, and a lower efficiency means that fewer cells are able to do so.

In molecular biology, transformation efficiency is a crucial parameter, it is used to evaluate the ability of different methods to introduce plasmid DNA into cells and to compare the efficiency of different plasmid, vectors and host cells. This efficiency can be affected by a number of factors, including the method used for introducing the DNA, the type of cell and plasmid used, and the conditions under which the transformation is performed. Therefore, measuring and optimizing transformation efficiency is an important step in many molecular biology applications, including genetic engineering, gene therapy and biotechnology.

Measurement

By measuring the transformation efficiency, we can utilize the information from our experiment to evaluate how effectively our transformation went. This is a quantification of how many cells were altered by 1 µg of plasmid DNA. In essence, it is a sign that the transformation experiment was successful.[1] It should be determined under conditions of cell excess.[2]

Transformation efficiency is typically measured as the number of transformed cells per total number of cells. It can be represented as a percentage or as colony forming units (CFUs) per microgram of DNA.

One of the most common ways to measure transformation efficiency is by performing a colony forming assay. Here is an example of how to calculate transformation efficiency using colony forming units (CFUs):[3]

  1. Plate a known number of cells on agar plates containing the appropriate antibiotics.
  2. Incubate the plates for a period of time (usually overnight) at the appropriate temperature and conditions for the cells.
  3. Count the number of colonies that grow on the plates. This represents the number of cells that have taken up and expressed the plasmid DNA.
  4. To calculate the transformation efficiency, divide the number of colonies by the number of cells plated and multiply by 100. The result will be the transformation efficiency as a percentage.

For example, if you plate 1x 107 cells and count 1000 colonies, the transformation efficiency is: (1000/1x 107) x 100 = 0.1%

Alternatively, CFUs can be reported per microgram of DNA used for the transformation. This can be calculated by multiplying the number of colonies by the volume of the culture plated and dividing by the amount of DNA used.

Quantitative PCR (qPCR) - This method utilizes the fact that the plasmid DNA will have a specific gene or sequence that is not present in the host cell genome, and therefore can be used as a target for qPCR. By quantifying the number of copies of this specific gene or sequence in the transformed cells, it is possible to determine the amount of plasmid DNA present in the cell, and thus the transformation efficiency.[4]

Fluorescent assay - This method relies on the use of a plasmid that contains a fluorescent protein or reporter gene. The transformed cells are then analyzed by flow cytometry or fluorescence microscopy to determine the number of cells that express the fluorescent protein. The transformation efficiency is then calculated as the percentage of cells that express the fluorescent protein.[5]

The number of viable cells in a preparation for a transformation reaction may range from 2×108 to 1011; most common methods of E. coli preparation yield around 1010 viable cells per reaction. The standard plasmids used for determination of transformation efficiency in Escherichia coli are pBR322 or other similarly sized or smaller vectors, such as the pUC series of vectors. Different vectors however may be used to determine their transformation efficiency. 10–100 pg of DNA may be used for transformation, more DNA may be necessary for low-efficiency transformation (generally saturation level is reached at over 10 ng).[6]

After transformation, 1% and 10% of the cells are plated separately, the cells may be diluted in media as necessary for ease of plating. Further dilution may be used for high efficiency transformation.

A transformation efficiency of 1×108 cfu/μg for a small plasmid like pUC19 is roughly equivalent to 1 in 2000 molecules of the plasmid used being introduced into cells. In E. coli, the theoretical limit of transformation efficiency for most commonly used plasmids would be over 1×1011 cfu/μg. In practice the best achievable result may be around 2–4×1010 cfu/μg for a small plasmid like pUC19, and considerably lower for large plasmids.

Factors affecting transformation efficiency

Individual cells are capable of taking up many DNA molecules, but the presence of multiple plasmids does not significantly affect the occurrence of successful transformation events.[7] A number of factors may affect the transformation efficiency:[2]

Plasmid size – A study done in E. coli found that transformation efficiency declines linearly with increasing plasmid size, i.e. larger plasmids transform less well than smaller plasmids.[7][8][9]

Forms of DNA – Supercoiled plasmid have a slightly better transformation efficiency than relaxed plasmids – relaxed plasmids are transformed at around 75% efficiency of supercoiled ones.[7] Linear and single-stranded DNA however have much lower transformation efficiency. Single-stranded DNAs are transformed at 104 lower efficiency than double-stranded ones.

Media composition – The composition of the media used in the transformation process can affect the efficiency. For example, certain media supplements can increase the natural competence of cells.[10]

Genotype of cells – Cloning strains may contain mutations that improve the transformation efficiency of the cells. For example, E. coli K12 strains with the deoR mutation, originally found to confer an ability of cell to grow in minimum media using inosine as the sole carbon source, have 4-5 times the transformation efficiency of similar strains without. For linear DNA, which is poorly transformed in E. coli, the recBC or recD mutation can significantly improve the efficiency of its transformation.[11]

Culture conditions – E. coli cells are more susceptible to be made competent when it is growing rapidly, cells are therefore normally harvested in the early log phase of cell growth when preparing competent cells. The optimal optical density for harvesting cells normally lies around 0.4, although it may vary with different cell strains. A higher value of 0.94-0.95 has also been found to produce good yield of competent cells, but this can be impractical when cell growth is rapid.[12]

Presence of antibiotics – The presence of antibiotics can increase the efficiency of transformation by inhibiting the growth of non-transformed cells and selecting for transformed cells that are resistant to the antibiotic. For instance, the use of β-lactam antibiotics has been shown for glutamate-producing bacteria to increase it's transformation efficiencies.[13][14][15]

Plasmid origin of replication – The origin of replication of the plasmid used in the transformation process can affect the efficiency in several ways. The copy number of the plasmid in the cell, the activity of the origin of replication in the host cells, and the expression of the genes on the plasmid can all affect the efficiency. The plasmid with a high copy number origin of replication will generally have a higher transfection efficiency than one with a low copy number origin, using a plasmid with an origin of replication that is active in the host cell can lead to a higher transfection efficiency.[16]

Transformation conditions – The method of preparation of competent cells, the length of time of heat shock, temperature of heat shock, incubation time after heat shock, growth medium used, pH and various additives, all can affect the transformation efficiency of the cells. The presence of contaminants as well as ligase in a ligation mixture can reduce the transformation efficiency in electroporation,[17] and inactivation of ligase or chloroform extraction of DNA may be necessary for electroporation, alternatively only use a tenth of the ligation mixture to reduce the amount of contaminants. Normal preparation of competent cells can yield transformation efficiency ranging from 106 to 108 cfu/μg DNA. Protocols for chemical method however exist for making super competent cells that may yield a transformation efficiency of over 1 x 109.[18]

Damage to DNA – Exposure of DNA to UV radiation in standard preparative agarose gel electrophoresis procedure for as little as 45 seconds can damage the DNA, and this can significantly reduce the transformation efficiency.[19] Adding cytidine or guanosine to the electrophoresis buffer at 1 mM concentration however may protect the DNA from damage. A higher-wavelength UV radiation (365 nm) which cause less damage to DNA should be used if it is necessary work for work on the DNA on a UV transilluminator for an extended period of time. This longer wavelength UV produces weaker fluorescence with the ethidium bromide intercalated into the DNA, therefore if it is necessary to capture images of the DNA bands, a shorter wavelength (302 or 312 nm) UV radiations may be used. Such exposure however should be limited to a very short time if the DNA is to be recovered later for ligation and transformation.

Efficiency of transformation methods

The method used for introducing the DNA have a significant impact on the transformation efficiency.[20]

Electroporation

Electroporation tends to be more efficient than chemical methods and can be applied to a wide range of species and to strains that were previously resistant and recalcitrant to transformation techniques.[21][22]

Electroporation has been found to have an average yield typically between 104 - 108 CFU/ug . However, a transformation efficiencies as high as 0.5-5 x 1010 colony forming units (CFU) per microgram of DNA for E. coli. For samples that are hard to handle, like cDNA libraries, gDNA, and plasmids larger than 30 kb, it is suggested to use electrocompetent cells that have transformation efficiencies of over 1 x 1010 CFU/µg. This will ensure a high success rate in introducing the DNA and forming a large number of colonies.[23] It is important to adjust and optimize the electroporation buffer (Increasing the concentration of the electroporation buffer can result in increased transformation efficiencies ) and the shape, strength, number, and number of pulses these electrical parameters play a key role in transformation efficiency.[24]

Chemical transformation

Chemical transformation or heat shock can be performed in a simple laboratory setup, typically yielding transformation efficiencies that are adequate for cloning and subcloning applications, approximately 106 CFU/µg. One of the early methods used was a combination of CaCl2 and MgCl2 to treat the cells. However, these methods resulted in transformation efficiencies, with a maximum of 105 - 106 colony forming units (CFU) per microgram of plasmid DNA.[23] Later research found that certain cations, such as Mn2+, Ca2+, Ba2+, Sr2+ and Mg2+ could have a positive effect on transformation efficiencies, with Mn2+ showing the greatest effect.[25]

Restriction barriers to an efficient transformation

Some bacterial cells have restriction-modification systems that can degrade exogenous plasmids that are foreign to the host cell. This can greatly reduce the efficiency of transformation.[26][27] This is due to restriction systems in the recipient cells that target and destroy exogenous DNA. These systems recognize exogenous DNA based on differences in methylation patterns. To address this problem, strategies such as altering the methylation of the exogenous DNA using commercial methylases or reducing the restriction activity in the recipient cells have been applied.[28][29] For example, using methylation-negative mutants or temporarily inactivating the restriction system with heat can reduce the recipient cell's ability to impose restrictions on the exogenous DNA.[30]

See also

References
  1. "how to calculate transformation efficiency". www.edvotek.com. Retrieved 2023-01-05.
  2. Hanahan D, Jessee J, Bloom FR (1991). "[4] Plasmid transformation of Escherichia coli and other bacteria". Plasmid transformation of Escherichia coli and other bacteria. Methods in Enzymology. Vol. 204. pp. 63–113. doi:10.1016/0076-6879(91)04006-a. ISBN 9780121821050. PMID 1943786.
  3. Sieuwerts S, de Bok FA, Mols E, de vos WM, Vlieg JE (October 2008). "A simple and fast method for determining colony forming units". Letters in Applied Microbiology. 47 (4): 275–278. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2008.02417.x. PMID 18778376. S2CID 205628268.
  4. Sun S, Kang XP, Xing XJ, Xu XY, Cheng J, Zheng SW, Xing GM (2015-09-03). "Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L. cv. Hezuo 908) with improved efficiency". Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment. 29 (5): 861–868. doi:10.1080/13102818.2015.1056753. ISSN 1310-2818. S2CID 84120044.
  5. Rasala BA, Barrera DJ, Ng J, Plucinak TM, Rosenberg JN, Weeks DP, et al. (May 2013). "Expanding the spectral palette of fluorescent proteins for the green microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii". The Plant Journal. 74 (4): 545–556. doi:10.1111/tpj.12165. PMID 23521393.
  6. "Calculating Transformation Efficiency". Sigma-Aldrich.
  7. Hanahan D (June 1983). "Studies on transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids". Journal of Molecular Biology. 166 (4): 557–580. doi:10.1016/S0022-2836(83)80284-8. PMID 6345791.
  8. Sheng Y, Mancino V, Birren B (June 1995). "Transformation of Escherichia coli with large DNA molecules by electroporation". Nucleic Acids Research. 23 (11): 1990–1996. doi:10.1093/nar/23.11.1990. PMC 306974. PMID 7596828.
  9. Nakata Y, Tang X, Yokoyama KK (1996). "Preparation of competent cells for high-efficiency plasmid transformation of Escherichia coli". cDNA Library Protocols. Methods in Molecular Biology. Vol. 69. New Jersey: Humana Press. pp. 129–137. doi:10.1385/0-89603-383-x:129. ISBN 0-89603-383-X. PMID 9116846.
  10. Yan L, Xu R, Zhou Y, Gong Y, Dai S, Liu H, Bian Y (June 2019). "Effects of Medium Composition and Genetic Background on Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation Efficiency of Lentinula edodes". Genes. 10 (6): 467. doi:10.3390/genes10060467. PMC 6627104. PMID 31248134.
  11. Murphy KC (April 1998). "Use of bacteriophage lambda recombination functions to promote gene replacement in Escherichia coli". Journal of Bacteriology. 180 (8): 2063–2071. doi:10.1128/JB.180.8.2063-2071.1998. PMC 107131. PMID 9555887.
  12. Tang X, Nakata Y, Li HO, Zhang M, Gao H, Fujita A, et al. (July 1994). "The optimization of preparations of competent cells for transformation of E. coli". Nucleic Acids Research. 22 (14): 2857–2858. doi:10.1093/nar/22.14.2857. PMC 308259. PMID 8052542.
  13. Katsumata R, Ozaki A, Oka T, Furuya A (July 1984). "Protoplast transformation of glutamate-producing bacteria with plasmid DNA". Journal of Bacteriology. 159 (1): 306–311. doi:10.1128/jb.159.1.306-311.1984. PMC 215630. PMID 6145700.
  14. Charpentier X, Kay E, Schneider D, Shuman HA (March 2011). "Antibiotics and UV radiation induce competence for natural transformation in Legionella pneumophila". Journal of Bacteriology. 193 (5): 1114–1121. doi:10.1128/JB.01146-10. PMC 3067580. PMID 21169481.
  15. Lopatkin AJ, Sysoeva TA, You L (December 2016). "Dissecting the effects of antibiotics on horizontal gene transfer: Analysis suggests a critical role of selection dynamics". BioEssays. 38 (12): 1283–1292. doi:10.1002/bies.201600133. PMC 6541220. PMID 27699821.
  16. "Plasmids - an overview !Topics". www.sciencedirect.com. Retrieved 2023-01-25.
  17. Ymer S (December 1991). "Heat inactivation of DNA ligase prior to electroporation increases transformation efficiency". Nucleic Acids Research. 19 (24): 6960. doi:10.1093/nar/19.24.6960. PMC 329344. PMID 1762931.
  18. Inoue H, Nojima H, Okayama H (November 1990). "High efficiency transformation of Escherichia coli with plasmids". Gene. 96 (1): 23–28. doi:10.1016/0378-1119(90)90336-P. PMID 2265755.
  19. Gründemann D, Schömig E (November 1996). "Protection of DNA during preparative agarose gel electrophoresis against damage induced by ultraviolet light". BioTechniques. 21 (5): 898–903. doi:10.2144/96215rr02. PMID 8922632.
  20. Aune TE, Aachmann FL (February 2010). "Methodologies to increase the transformation efficiencies and the range of bacteria that can be transformed". Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 85 (5): 1301–1313. doi:10.1007/s00253-009-2349-1. PMID 19946685. S2CID 29812996.
  21. Romero D, Pérez-García A, Veening JW, de Vicente A, Kuipers OP (September 2006). "Transformation of undomesticated strains of Bacillus subtilis by protoplast electroporation". Journal of Microbiological Methods. 66 (3): 556–559. doi:10.1016/j.mimet.2006.01.005. PMID 16503058.
  22. Rhee MS, Kim JW, Qian Y, Ingram LO, Shanmugam KT (July 2007). "Development of plasmid vector and electroporation condition for gene transfer in sporogenic lactic acid bacterium, Bacillus coagulans". Plasmid. 58 (1): 13–22. doi:10.1016/j.plasmid.2006.11.006. PMID 17215040.
  23. "Competent Cell Selection–6 General Considerations - US". www.thermofisher.com. Retrieved 2023-01-27.
  24. Dower WJ, Miller JF, Ragsdale CW (July 1988). "High efficiency transformation of E. coli by high voltage electroporation". Nucleic Acids Research. 16 (13): 6127–6145. doi:10.1093/nar/16.13.6127. PMC 336852. PMID 3041370.
  25. "Table 1: The Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in cathepsin B protein mined from literature (PMID: 16492714)". doi:10.7717/peerj.7425/table-1. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  26. Cosloy SD, Oishi M (January 1973). "Genetic transformation in Escherichia coli K12". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 70 (1): 84–87. Bibcode:1973PNAS...70...84C. doi:10.1073/pnas.70.1.84. PMC 433189. PMID 4630612.
  27. Aune TE, Aachmann FL (February 2010). "Methodologies to increase the transformation efficiencies and the range of bacteria that can be transformed". Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 85 (5): 1301–1313. doi:10.1007/s00253-009-2349-1. PMID 19946685. S2CID 29812996.
  28. Lawrenz MB, Kawabata H, Purser JE, Norris SJ (September 2002). "Decreased electroporation efficiency in Borrelia burgdorferi containing linear plasmids lp25 and lp56: impact on transformation of infectious B. burgdorferi". Infection and Immunity. 70 (9): 4798–4804. doi:10.1128/IAI.70.9.4798-4804.2002. PMC 128261. PMID 12183522.
  29. Mizuno T, Mutoh N, Panasenko SM, Imae Y (March 1986). "Acquisition of maltose chemotaxis in Salmonella typhimurium by the introduction of the Escherichia coli chemosensory transducer gene". Journal of Bacteriology. 165 (3): 890–895. doi:10.1128/jb.165.3.890-895.1986. PMC 214512. PMID 3512528.
  30. Edwards RA, Helm RA, Maloy SR (May 1999). "Increasing DNA transfer efficiency by temporary inactivation of host restriction". BioTechniques. 26 (5): 892–4, 896, 898 passim. doi:10.2144/99265st02. PMID 10337482.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.