Shock (circulatory)

Shock is the state of insufficient blood flow to the tissues of the body as a result of problems with the circulatory system.[1][2] Initial symptoms of shock may include weakness, fast heart rate, fast breathing, sweating, anxiety, and increased thirst.[1] This may be followed by confusion, unconsciousness, or cardiac arrest, as complications worsen.[1]

For other uses, see Shock (disambiguation).
Shock
US Navy EMT trainees and firemen using IV fluid replacement in treating a trauma training mannequin to prevent hypovolemic shock.
SpecialtyCritical care medicine
SymptomsInitial: Weakness, fast heart rate, fast breathing, sweating, anxiety, increased thirst[1]
Later: Confusion, unconsciousness, cardiac arrest[1]
TypesLow volume, cardiogenic, obstructive, distributive[2]
CausesLow volume: Severe bleeding, vomiting, diarrhea, dehydration, or pancreatitis[1]
Cardiogenic: severe heart attack (especially of the left or right ventricles), severe heart failure, cardiac contusion[1]
Obstructive: Cardiac tamponade, tension pneumothorax[1]
Distributive: Sepsis, spinal cord injury, certain overdoses[1]
Diagnostic methodBased on symptoms, physical exam, laboratory tests[2]
TreatmentBased on the underlying cause[2]
MedicationIntravenous fluid, vasopressors[2]
PrognosisRisk of death 20 to 50%[3]
Frequency1.2 million per year (US)[3]

Shock is divided into four main types based on the underlying cause: low volume, cardiogenic, obstructive, and distributive shock.[2] Low volume shock, also known as hypovolemic shock, may be from bleeding, diarrhea, or vomiting.[1] Cardiogenic shock may be due to a heart attack or cardiac contusion.[1] Obstructive shock may be due to cardiac tamponade or a tension pneumothorax.[1] Distributive shock may be due to sepsis, anaphylaxis, injury to the upper spinal cord, or certain overdoses.[1][4]

The diagnosis is generally based on a combination of symptoms, physical examination, and laboratory tests.[2] A decreased pulse pressure (systolic blood pressure minus diastolic blood pressure) or a fast heart rate raises concerns.[1] The heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure, known as the shock index (SI), of greater than 0.8 supports the diagnosis more than low blood pressure or a fast heart rate in isolation.[5][6]

Treatment of shock is based on the likely underlying cause.[2] An open airway and sufficient breathing should be established.[2] Any ongoing bleeding should be stopped, which may require surgery or embolization.[2] Intravenous fluid, such as Ringer's lactate or packed red blood cells, is often given.[2] Efforts to maintain a normal body temperature are also important.[2] Vasopressors may be useful in certain cases.[2] Shock is both common and has a high risk of death.[3] In the United States about 1.2 million people present to the emergency room each year with shock and their risk of death is between 20 and 50%.[3]

Signs and symptoms

The presentation of shock is variable, with some people having only minimal symptoms such as confusion and weakness.[7] While the general signs for all types of shock are low blood pressure, decreased urine output, and confusion, these may not always be present.[7] While a fast heart rate is common, those on β-blockers, those who are athletic, and in 30% of cases of those with shock due to intra abdominal bleeding, heart rate may be normal or slow.[8] Specific subtypes of shock may have additional symptoms.

Dry mucous membrane, reduced skin turgor, prolonged capillary refill time, weak peripheral pulses, and cold extremities can be early signs of shock.[9]

Low volume
Main articles: Hypovolemia and Hypovolemic shock

Hypovolemic shock is the most common type of shock and is caused by insufficient circulating volume.[7] The most common cause of hypovolemic shock is hemorrhage (internal or external); however, vomiting and diarrhea are more common causes in children.[10] Other causes include burns, as well as excess urine loss due to diabetic ketoacidosis and diabetes insipidus.[10]

Hemorrhage classes[11]
ClassBlood loss (liters)ResponseTreatment
I<15% (0.75 L)min. fast heart rate, normal blood pressureminimal
II15–30% (0.75–1.5 L)fast heart rate, min. low blood pressureintravenous fluids
III30–40% (1.5–2 L)very fast heart rate, low blood pressure, confusionfluids and packed RBCs
IV>40% (>2 L)critical blood pressure and heart rateaggressive interventions

Signs and symptoms of hypovolemic shock include:

The severity of hemorrhagic shock can be graded on a 1–4 scale on the physical signs. The shock index (heart rate divided by systolic blood pressure) is a stronger predictor of the impact of blood loss than heart rate and blood pressure alone.[5] This relationship has not been well established in pregnancy-related bleeding.[12]

Cardiogenic
Main article: Cardiogenic shock

Cardiogenic shock is caused by the failure of the heart to pump effectively.[7] This can be due to damage to the heart muscle, most often from a large myocardial infarction. Other causes of cardiogenic shock include dysrhythmias, cardiomyopathy/myocarditis, congestive heart failure (CHF), myocardial contusion, or valvular heart disease problems.[10]

Symptoms of cardiogenic shock include:

Obstructive
Main article: Obstructive shock

Obstructive shock is a form of shock associated with physical obstruction of the great vessels of the systemic or pulmonary circulation.[13] Several conditions can result in this form of shock.

Many of the signs of obstructive shock are similar to cardiogenic shock, however treatments differ. Symptoms of obstructive shock include:

Distributive
Main article: Distributive shock
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome[16]
FindingValue
Temperature<36 °C (96.8 °F) or >38 °C (100.4 °F)
Heart rate>90/min
Respiratory rate>20/min or PaCO2<32 mmHg (4.3 kPa)
WBC<4x109/L (<4000/mm3), >12x109/L (>12,000/mm3), or ≥10% bands

Distributive shock is low blood pressure due to a dilation of blood vessels within the body.[7][17] This can be caused by systemic infection (septic shock), a severe allergic reaction (anaphylaxis), or spinal cord injury (neurogenic shock).

Main article: Septic shock

Endocrine

Although not officially classified as a subcategory of shock, many endocrinology disturbances in their severe form can result in shock.

Cause
Type Cause
Low volume Fluid loss such as bleeding or diarrhea
Cardiogenic Ineffective pumping due to heart damage
Obstructive Blood flow to or from the heart is blocked
Distributive Abnormal flow within the small blood vessels[21]

Shock is a common end point of many medical conditions.[10] Shock triggered by a serious allergic reaction is known as anaphylactic shock, shock triggered by severe dehydration or blood loss is known as hypovolemic shock, shock caused by sepsis is known as septic shock, etc. Shock itself is a life-threatening condition as a result of compromised body circulation.[22] It can be divided into four main types based on the underlying cause: hypovolemic, distributive, cardiogenic, and obstructive.[23] A few additional classifications are occasionally used, such as endocrinologic shock.[10]

Pathophysiology
Effects of inadequate perfusion on cell function.

There are four stages of shock. Shock is a complex and continuous condition, and there is no sudden transition from one stage to the next.[24] At a cellular level, shock is the process of oxygen demand becoming greater than oxygen supply.[7]

One of the key dangers of shock is that it progresses by a positive feedback loop. Poor blood supply leads to cellular damage, which results in an inflammatory response to increase blood flow to the affected area. Normally, this causes the blood supply level to match with tissue demand for nutrients. However, if there is enough increased demand in some areas, it can deprive other areas of sufficient supply, which then start demanding more. This then leads to an ever escalating cascade.

As such, shock is a runaway condition of homeostatic failure, where the usual corrective mechanisms relating to oxygenation of the body no longer function in a stable way. When it occurs, immediate treatment is critical in order to return an individual's metabolism into a stable, self-correcting trajectory. Otherwise the condition can become increasingly difficult to correct, surprisingly quickly, and then progress to a fatal outcome. In the particular case of anaphylactic shock, progression to death might take just a few minutes.[6]

Initial

During the Initial stage (Stage 1), the state of hypoperfusion causes hypoxia. Due to the lack of oxygen, the cells perform lactic acid fermentation. Since oxygen, the terminal electron acceptor in the electron transport chain, is not abundant, this slows down entry of pyruvate into the Krebs cycle, resulting in its accumulation. The accumulating pyruvate is converted to lactate (lactic acid) by lactate dehydrogenase. The accumulating lactate causes lactic acidosis.

Compensatory

The Compensatory stage (Stage 2) is characterised by the body employing physiological mechanisms, including neural, hormonal, and bio-chemical mechanisms, in an attempt to reverse the condition. As a result of the acidosis, the person will begin to hyperventilate in order to rid the body of carbon dioxide (CO2). CO2 indirectly acts to acidify the blood, so the body attempts to return to acid–base homeostasis by removing that acidifying agent. The baroreceptors in the arteries detect the hypotension resulting from large amounts of blood being redirected to distant tissues, and cause the release of epinephrine and norepinephrine. Norepinephrine causes predominately vasoconstriction with a mild increase in heart rate, whereas epinephrine predominately causes an increase in heart rate with a small effect on the vascular tone; the combined effect results in an increase in blood pressure. The renin–angiotensin axis is activated, and arginine vasopressin (anti-diuretic hormone) is released to conserve fluid by reducing its excretion via the renal system. These hormones cause the vasoconstriction of the kidneys, gastrointestinal tract, and other organs to divert blood to the heart, lungs and brain. The lack of blood to the renal system causes the characteristic low urine production. However the effects of the renin–angiotensin axis take time and are of little importance to the immediate homeostatic mediation of shock.

Progressive/decompensated

The Progressive stage (stage 3) results if the underlying cause of the shock is not successfully treated. During this stage, compensatory mechanisms begin to fail. Due to the decreased perfusion of the cells in the body, sodium ions build up within the intracellular space while potassium ions leak out. Due to lack of oxygen, cellular respiration diminishes and anaerobic metabolism predominates. As anaerobic metabolism continues, the arteriolar smooth muscle and precapillary sphincters relax such that blood remains in the capillaries.[18] Due to this, the hydrostatic pressure will increase and, combined with histamine release, will lead to leakage of fluid and protein into the surrounding tissues. As this fluid is lost, the blood concentration and viscosity increase, causing sludging of the micro-circulation. The prolonged vasoconstriction will also cause the vital organs to be compromised due to reduced perfusion.[18] If the bowel becomes sufficiently ischemic, bacteria may enter the blood stream, resulting in the increased complication of endotoxic shock.[6][18]

Refractory

At Refractory stage (stage 4), the vital organs have failed and the shock can no longer be reversed. Brain damage and cell death are occurring, and death will occur imminently. One of the primary reasons that shock is irreversible at this point is that much of the cellular ATP (the basic energy source for cells) has been degraded into adenosine in the absence of oxygen as an electron receptor in the mitochondrial matrix. Adenosine easily perfuses out of cellular membranes into extracellular fluid, furthering capillary vasodilation, and then is transformed into uric acid. Because cells can only produce adenosine at a rate of about 2% of the cell's total need per hour, even restoring oxygen is futile at this point because there is no adenosine to phosphorylate into ATP.[6]

Diagnosis

The diagnosis of shock is commonly based on a combination of symptoms, physical examination, and laboratory tests. Many signs and symptoms are not sensitive or specific for shock, thus many clinical decision-making tools have been developed to identify shock at an early stage.[25] A high degree of suspicion is necessary for the proper diagnosis of shock.

The first change seen in shock is increased cardiac output followed by a decrease in mixed venous oxygen saturation (SmvO2) as measured in the pulmonary artery via a pulmonary artery catheter.[26] Central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) as measured via a central line correlates well with SmvO2 and are easier to acquire. If shock progresses anaerobic metabolism will begin to occur with an increased blood lactic acid as the result. While many laboratory tests are typically performed, there is no test that either conclusively makes or excludes the diagnosis. A chest X-ray or emergency department ultrasound may be useful to determine volume status.[7][8]

Management

The best evidence exists for the treatment of septic shock in adults. However, the pathophysiology of shock in children appears to be similar so treatment methodologies have been extrapolated to children.[10] Management may include securing the airway via intubation if necessary to decrease the work of breathing and for guarding against respiratory arrest. Oxygen supplementation, intravenous fluids, passive leg raising (not Trendelenburg position) should be started and blood transfusions added if blood loss is severe.[7] In select cases, compression devices like non-pneumatic anti-shock garments (or the deprecated military anti-shock trousers) can be used to prevent further blood loss and concentrate fluid in the body's head and core.[27] It is important to keep the person warm to avoid hypothermia[28] as well as adequately manage pain and anxiety as these can increase oxygen consumption.[7] Negative impact by shock is reversible if it's recognized and treated early in time.[22]

Fluids

Aggressive intravenous fluids are recommended in most types of shock (e.g. 1–2 liter normal saline bolus over 10 minutes or 20 mL/kg in a child) which is usually instituted as the person is being further evaluated.[29] Colloids and crystalloids appear to be equally effective with respect to outcomes.,[30] Balanced crystalloids and normal saline also appear to be equally effective in critically ill patients.[31] If the person remains in shock after initial resuscitation, packed red blood cells should be administered to keep the hemoglobin greater than 100 g/L.[7]

For those with hemorrhagic shock, the current evidence supports limiting the use of fluids for penetrating thorax and abdominal injuries allowing mild hypotension to persist (known as permissive hypotension).[32] Targets include a mean arterial pressure of 60 mmHg, a systolic blood pressure of 70–90 mmHg,[7][33] or until the patient has adequate mentation and peripheral pulses.[33] Hypertonic fluid may also be an option in this group.[34]

Medications
Epinephrine auto-injector

Vasopressors may be used if blood pressure does not improve with fluids. Common vasopressors used in shock include: norepinephrine, phenylephrine, dopamine, and dobutamine.

There is no evidence of substantial benefit of one vasopressor over another;[35] however, using dopamine leads to an increased risk of arrhythmia when compared with norepinephrine.[36] Vasopressors have not been found to improve outcomes when used for hemorrhagic shock from trauma[37] but may be of use in neurogenic shock.[20] Activated protein C (Xigris), while once aggressively promoted for the management of septic shock, has been found not to improve survival and is associated with a number of complications.[38] Activated protein C was withdrawn from the market in 2011, and clinical trials were discontinued.[38] The use of sodium bicarbonate is controversial as it has not been shown to improve outcomes.[39] If used at all it should only be considered if the blood pH is less than 7.0.[39]

People with anaphylactic shock are commonly treated with epinephrine. Antihistamines, such as Benadryl (diphenhydramine) or ranitidine are also commonly administered. Albuterol, normal saline, and steroids are also commonly given.

Mechanical support

Treatment goals

The goal of treatment is to achieve a urine output of greater than 0.5 mL/kg/h, a central venous pressure of 8–12 mmHg and a mean arterial pressure of 65–95 mmHg. In trauma the goal is to stop the bleeding which in many cases requires surgical interventions. A good urine output indicates that the kidneys are getting enough blood flow.

Epidemiology

Septic shock (a form of distributive shock), is the most common form of shock. Shock from blood loss occurs in about 1–2% of trauma cases.[33] Overall, up to one-third of people admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) are in circulatory shock.[41] Of these, cardiogenic shock accounts for approximately 20%, hypovolemic about 20%, and septic shock about 60% of cases.[42]

Prognosis
Sepsis mortality

The prognosis of shock depends on the underlying cause and the nature and extent of concurrent problems. Low volume, anaphylactic, and neurogenic shock are readily treatable and respond well to medical therapy. Septic shock, especially septic shock where treatment is delayed or the antimicrobial drugs are ineffective, however has a mortality rate between 30% and 80%; cardiogenic shock has a mortality rate of up to 70% to 90%, though quick treatment with vasopressors and inotropic drugs, cardiac surgery, and the use of assistive devices can lower the mortality.[43]

History

There is no evidence of the word shock being used in its modern-day form prior to 1743. However, there is evidence that Hippocrates used the word exemia to signify a state of being "drained of blood".[44] Shock or "choc" was first described in a trauma victim in the English translation of Henri-François LeDran's 1740 text, Traité ou Reflexions Tire'es de la Pratique sur les Playes d'armes à feu (A treatise, or reflections, drawn from practice on gun-shot wounds.)[45] In this text he describes "choc" as a reaction to the sudden impact of a missile. However, the first English writer to use the word shock in its modern-day connotation was James Latta, in 1795.

Prior to World War I, there were several competing hypotheses behind the pathophysiology of shock. Of the various theories, the most well regarded was a theory penned by George W. Crile who suggested in his 1899 monograph, "An Experimental Research into Surgical Shock", that shock was quintessentially defined as a state of circulatory collapse (vasodilation) due to excessive nervous stimulation.[46] Other competing theories around the turn of the century included one penned by Malcom in 1907, in which the assertion was that prolonged vasoconstriction led to the pathophysiological signs and symptoms of shock.[47] In the following World War I, research concerning shock resulted in experiments by Walter B. Cannon of Harvard and William M. Bayliss of London in 1919 that showed that an increase in permeability of the capillaries in response to trauma or toxins was responsible for many clinical manifestations of shock.[48][49] In 1972 Hinshaw and Cox suggested the classification system for shock which is still used today.[50][43]

References
  1. International Trauma Life Support for Emergency Care Providers (8 ed.). Pearson Education Limited. 2018. pp. 172–73. ISBN 978-1292-17084-8.
  2. ATLS – Advanced Trauma Life Support – Student Course Manual (10 ed.). American College of Surgeons. 2018. pp. 43–52, 135. ISBN 978-78-0-9968267.
  3. Tabas, Jeffrey; Reynolds, Teri (2010). High Risk Emergencies, An Issue of Emergency Medicine Clinics (E-book). Elsevier Health Sciences. p. 58. ISBN 978-1455700257.
  4. Smith, N; Lopez, RA; Silberman, M (January 2019). "Distributive Shock". StatPearls (Internet). PMID 29261964.
  5. Olaussen A, Blackburn T, Mitra B, Fitzgerald M (June 2014). "Review article: shock index for prediction of critical bleeding post-trauma: a systematic review". Emergency Medicine Australasia. 26 (3): 223–28. doi:10.1111/1742-6723.12232. PMID 24712642. S2CID 19881753.
  6. Guyton, Arthur; Hall, John (2006). "Chapter 24: Circulatory Shock and Physiology of Its Treatment". In Gruliow, Rebecca (ed.). Textbook of Medical Physiology (11th ed.). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Elsevier Inc. pp. 278–88. ISBN 978-0-7216-0240-0.
  7. Tintinalli, Judith E. (2010). Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies. pp. 165–72. ISBN 978-0-07-148480-0.
  8. Tintinalli, Judith E. (2010). Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies. pp. 174–75. ISBN 978-0-07-148480-0.
  9. Assessing dehydration and shock. April 2009. Retrieved 2019-05-09. {{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help)
  10. Silverman, Adam (Oct 2005). "Shock: A Common Pathway For Life-Threatening Pediatric Illnesses And Injuries". Pediatric Emergency Medicine Practice. 2 (10).
  11. Tintinalli, Judith E. (2010). Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies. ISBN 978-0-07-148480-0.
  12. Pacagnella RC, Souza JP, Durocher J, Perel P, Blum J, Winikoff B, Gülmezoglu AM (2013). "A systematic review of the relationship between blood loss and clinical signs". PLOS ONE. 8 (3): e57594. Bibcode:2013PLoSO...857594P. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0057594. PMC 3590203. PMID 23483915.
  13. Pich, H.; Heller, A.R. (May 2015). "Obstruktiver Schock". Der Anaesthesist (in German). 64 (5): 403–19. doi:10.1007/s00101-015-0031-9. ISSN 0003-2417. PMID 25994928. S2CID 39461027.
  14. Cheatham, Michael Lee (April 2009). "Abdominal compartment syndrome". Current Opinion in Critical Care. 15 (2): 154–62. doi:10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283297934. ISSN 1531-7072. PMID 19276799. S2CID 42407737.
  15. Cheatham, Michael L.; Malbrain, Manu L. N. G.; Kirkpatrick, Andrew; Sugrue, Michael; Parr, Michael; De Waele, Jan; Balogh, Zsolt; Leppäniemi, Ari; Olvera, Claudia; Ivatury, Rao; D'Amours, Scott (June 2007). "Results from the International Conference of Experts on Intra-abdominal Hypertension and Abdominal Compartment Syndrome. II. Recommendations". Intensive Care Medicine. 33 (6): 951–62. doi:10.1007/s00134-007-0592-4. ISSN 0342-4642. PMID 17377769. S2CID 10770608.
  16. Bone RC, Balk RA, et al. (The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine) (June 1992). "Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis". Chest. 101 (6): 1644–55. doi:10.1378/chest.101.6.1644. PMID 1303622.
  17. Isaac, Jeff. (2013). Wilderness and rescue medicine. Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN 9780763789206. OCLC 785442005.
  18. Kumar, Vinay; Abbas, Abul K.; Fausto, Nelson; Mitchell, Richard N. (2007). Robbins Basic Pathology (8th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Saunders/Elsevier. pp. 102–103. ISBN 978-1-4160-2973-1. OCLC 69672074.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date and year (link)
  19. "Surviving Sepsis Campaign Responds to ProCESS Trial" (PDF). Surviving Sepsis Campaign. Survivingsepsis.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2015-09-24. Retrieved 2015-03-25.
  20. Cocchi MN, Kimlin E, Walsh M, Donnino MW (August 2007). "Identification and resuscitation of the trauma patient in shock". Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America. 25 (3): 623–42, vii. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.688.9838. doi:10.1016/j.emc.2007.06.001. PMID 17826209.
  21. Elbers PW, Ince C (2006). "Mechanisms of critical illness – classifying microcirculatory flow abnormalities in distributive shock". Critical Care. 10 (4): 221. doi:10.1186/cc4969. PMC 1750971. PMID 16879732.
  22. "Definition, classification, etiology, and pathophysiology of shock in adults". UpToDate. Retrieved 2019-02-22.
  23. Tintinalli, Judith E. (2010). Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies. p. 168. ISBN 978-0-07-148480-0.
  24. Armstrong, D.J. (2004). Shock (2nd ed.). In: Alexander, M.F., Fawcett, J.N., Runciman, P.J. Nursing Practice. Hospital and Home. The Adult.: Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
  25. Lembke, Kelly; Parashar, Sanjay; Simpson, Steven (2017-10-01). "Sensitivity and Specificity of SIRS, qSOFA and Severe Sepsis for Mortality of Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With Suspected Infection". Chest. 152 (4): A401. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2017.08.427. ISSN 0012-3692.
  26. Shoemaker, W. C. (May 1996). "Temporal physiologic patterns of shock and circulatory dysfunction based on early descriptions by invasive and noninvasive monitoring". New Horizons (Baltimore, Md.). 4 (2): 300–18. ISSN 1063-7389. PMID 8774804.
  27. Mbaruku, Godfrey; Therrien, Michelle Skaer; Tillya, Robert; Mbuyita, Selemani; Mtema, Zacharia; Kinyonge, Iddajovana; Godfrey, Ritha; Temu, Silas; Miller, Suellen (December 2018). "Implementation project of the non-pneumatic anti-shock garment and m-communication to enhance maternal health care in rural Tanzania". Reproductive Health. 15 (1): 177. doi:10.1186/s12978-018-0613-5. PMC 6194579. PMID 30340602.
  28. Nolan JP, Pullinger R (March 2014). "Hypovolaemic shock". BMJ. 348 (mar07 1): g1139. doi:10.1136/bmj.g1139. PMID 24609389. S2CID 45691590.
  29. American College of Surgeons (2008). ATLS, Advanced Trauma Life Support Program for Doctors. Amer College of Surgeons. p. 58. ISBN 978-1-880696-31-6.
  30. Lewis SR, Pritchard MW, Evans DJ, Butler AR, Alderson P, Smith AF, Roberts I (August 2018). "Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 8 (8): CD000567. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD000567.pub7. PMC 6513027. PMID 30073665.
  31. Liu, C; Lu, G; Wang, D; Lei, Y; Mao, Z; Hu, P; Hu, J; Liu, R; Han, D; Zhou, F (November 2019). "Balanced crystalloids versus normal saline for fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis". The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. 37 (11): 2072–78. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2019.02.045. PMID 30852043.
  32. Marx, J (2010). Rosen's emergency medicine: concepts and clinical practice 7th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby/Elsevier. p. 2467. ISBN 978-0-323-05472-0.
  33. Cherkas, David (Nov 2011). "Traumatic Hemorrhagic Shock: Advances In Fluid Management". Emergency Medicine Practice. 13 (11): 1–19, quiz 19–20. PMID 22164397. Archived from the original on 2012-01-18.
  34. Wu MC, Liao TY, Lee EM, Chen YS, Hsu WT, Lee MG, Tsou PY, Chen SC, Lee CC (November 2017). "Administration of Hypertonic Solutions for Hemorrhagic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Clinical Trials". Anesthesia and Analgesia. 125 (5): 1549–57. doi:10.1213/ANE.0000000000002451. PMID 28930937. S2CID 39310937.
  35. Gamper, Gunnar; Havel, Christof; Arrich, Jasmin; Losert, Heidrun; Pace, Nathan Leon; Müllner, Marcus; Herkner, Harald (2016-02-15). "Vasopressors for hypotensive shock". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2 (2): CD003709. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003709.pub4. ISSN 1469-493X. PMC 6516856. PMID 26878401.
  36. Gamper G, Havel C, Arrich J, Losert H, Pace NL, Müllner M, Herkner H (February 2016). "Vasopressors for hypotensive shock". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2 (2): CD003709. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003709.pub4. PMC 6516856. PMID 26878401.
  37. Diez C, Varon AJ (December 2009). "Airway management and initial resuscitation of the trauma patient". Current Opinion in Critical Care. 15 (6): 542–47. doi:10.1097/MCC.0b013e328331a8a7. PMID 19713836. S2CID 19918811.
  38. Martí-Carvajal AJ, Solà I, Gluud C, Lathyris D, Cardona AF (December 2012). "Human recombinant protein C for severe sepsis and septic shock in adult and paediatric patients". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2018 (12): CD004388. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004388.pub6. PMC 6464614. PMID 23235609.
  39. Boyd JH, Walley KR (August 2008). "Is there a role for sodium bicarbonate in treating lactic acidosis from shock?". Current Opinion in Critical Care. 14 (4): 379–83. doi:10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283069d5c. PMID 18614899. S2CID 22613993.
  40. Vincent, Jean-Louis; De Backer, Daniel (2013-10-31). Finfer, Simon R.; Vincent, Jean-Louis (eds.). "Circulatory Shock". New England Journal of Medicine. 369 (18): 1726–34. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1208943. ISSN 0028-4793. PMID 24171518. S2CID 6900105.
  41. Vincent JL, De Backer D (October 2013). "Circulatory shock". The New England Journal of Medicine. 369 (18): 1726–34. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1208943. PMID 24171518. S2CID 6900105.
  42. Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale R, Bakker J, Hofer C, Jaeschke R, Mebazaa A, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL, Vincent JL, Rhodes A (December 2014). "Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine". Intensive Care Medicine. 40 (12): 1795–815. doi:10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z. PMC 4239778. PMID 25392034.
  43. Irwin, Richard S.; Rippe, James M. (January 2003). Intensive Care Medicine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia & London. ISBN 978-0-7817-3548-3. Archived from the original on 2005-11-07.
  44. Cannon, Walter Bradford (1918). The Nature and Treatment of Wound Shock and Allied Conditions. American Medical Association.
  45. Bloch, Jack H.; Dietzman, Ronald H.; Pierce, Charles H.; Lillehei, Richard C. (April 1966). "Theories of the Production of Shock". British Journal of Anaesthesia. 38 (4): 234–49. doi:10.1093/bja/38.4.234. ISSN 0007-0912. PMID 5328405.
  46. Crile, George W. (1899). An Experimental Research Into Surgical Shock. Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott & Co. LCCN 99000784. Alt URL
  47. Malcolm, John D (23 September 1905). "The condition of the blood vessels during shock" (PDF). The Lancet. 166 (4282): 922–923. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)69075-X.
  48. Cannon, W. B. (19 July 1919). "The Course of Events in Secondary Wound Shock" (PDF). Journal of the American Medical Association. 73 (3): 174. doi:10.1001/jama.1919.02610290016008.
  49. Cannon, W. B.; Bayliss, W. M. (1919). "Note on Muscle Injury in Relation to Shock". Special Report Series, Medical Research Council, London. Medical Research Committee, Special Investigation Committee on Surgical Shock and Allied Conditions. 26 (8): 19.
  50. Hinshaw, Lerner B.; Cox, Barbara G. (1 October 1971). The Fundamental mechanisms of shock. Proceedings of a Symposium Held in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, October 1–2, 1971. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. Vol. 23. United States Navy Project THEMIS, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-9014-9. eISSN 2214-8019. ISBN 9780306390234. ISSN 0065-2598. LCCN 72077225. OCLC 549969.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.