Walking city

A walking city is a type of city that is created to avoid internal transportation, and therefore be small enough that a person can use walking to navigate the city. It is characterized by narrow, often winding streets.[1] Its transport system is inherently egalitarian, with no one being disadvantaged by a lack of transport, unlike modern automotive cities.[1] Walkability within areas positively impacts equity, sustainability, health, social benefits, less demand on other modes, economic development, and enjoyment.[2]

"Walking City" redirects here. For the conceptual, moving city, see Ron Herron § Walking City.

History
Narrow streets are a common feature in walking cities, where space is at a premium.

Before the advent of machine-powered transportation, walking cities were common, due to land transportation being a scarce commodity. People arranged cities to reduce the amount of one-way trips and the necessary length of these trips.[3] This meant that features of modern cities such as one-way streets would have been avoided by city planners. Circulation patterns were sought that assured people would travel the least distance. The crooked streets of medieval towns, while seemingly inefficient, were actually created to enable circumferential routes.[3]

In Europe, the walking city was dominant up to 1850, when walking, or at most, horse-drawn transport, was the primary means of movement.[1]

Many walking cities around the world became overrun by cars during the 1950s and 1960s, but some gradually reclaimed their walking qualities, such as Freiburg and Munich in Germany and Copenhagen in Denmark.[1]

Features

In walking cities, everything was "crammed into the smallest space possible". Streets were by necessity narrow, overhanging upper stories were common, and they were often surrounded by walls for defensive purposes.[3] Urban planning and policies related to zoning and infrastructure allow modern cities to be more walkable.[4] Urban sprawl and past city planning affects current public transit systems, such as the United States which spends more public tax dollars on transit but is less accessible.[5]

Edinburgh, Scotland

Examples

Some of the most walkable cities around the world include Florence, Athens, Edinburgh, Madrid, and Washington D.C.[6] The walkability of an area is determined by factors such as density, functional mix, and access networks. In addition, the Institute for Transportation and Development Policy (ITDP) ranked the walkability of cities according to the closeness to car-free places (100m), closeness to healthcare and education (1km), and by small size of city blocks.[7] Components including the allocation of funds toward public transit and walkways, as well as zoning and infrastructure changes contribute to the success of walkable cities. In Spain, Madrid combines inner-city transit with light-rail trains to provide over 89% of the population access to the transit system from less than one kilometer away.[8]

Environmental Impact

Walkable cities encourage walking, biking, and public transit opposed to passenger vehicles, which decreases the use of fossil fuels. In the United States, transportation is the largest contributor of green house gas emissions, accounting for 27% of the total in 2020.[9] Moreover, increased walkability results in less air and noise pollution, as well as additional land for green space that is not being used by vehicles.[10] These factors along with others tackle environmental disproportionality and injustice through ameliorating climate change and diversifying accessibility. The United Nations outlines 17 different Sustainable Development Goals that aim to tackle social and environmental problems.[11] Walking cities address SDG #11: Sustainable Cities and Communities through urban planning that allows access to better transportation.[12]

See also

References
  1. L. Schiller, Preston (2010). An Introduction to Sustainable Transportation: Policy, Planning and Implementation. Routledge. ISBN 978-1136541940.
  2. "5 Ways to Make Cities More Walkable". Kittelson & Associates, Inc. Retrieved 2022-05-29.
  3. Schaeffer, K. H. (1980). Access for All: Transportation and Urban Growth. Sclar, Elliott (Columbia University Press Morningside ed.). New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 8–9, 14. ISBN 0-231-05164-6. OCLC 6707513.
  4. "Planning and Policy". Walk Friendly Communities. 2017-04-21. Retrieved 2022-05-30.
  5. Stromberg, Joseph (2015-08-10). "The real reason American public transportation is such a disaster". Vox. Retrieved 2022-05-30.
  6. "Ranked: The World's Top 50 Most Walkable Cities | Tourlane". www.tourlane.com. Retrieved 2022-05-28.
  7. "Study reveals world's most walkable cities". the Guardian. 2020-10-15. Retrieved 2022-05-29.
  8. "15 Cities With the Best Public Transportation, Ranked". www.farandwide.com. Retrieved 2022-05-29.
  9. US EPA, OAR (2015-12-29). "Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions". www.epa.gov. Retrieved 2022-05-29.
  10. "Analysis | Walkable neighborhoods provide health, environmental and financial benefits". Washington Post. ISSN 0190-8286. Retrieved 2022-05-29.
  11. dpicampaigns. "Take Action for the Sustainable Development Goals". United Nations Sustainable Development. Retrieved 2022-05-29.
  12. "Cities - United Nations Sustainable Development Action 2015". United Nations Sustainable Development. Retrieved 2022-05-29.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.