Yates Report

The report noted that the league did not have an anti-harassment policy until players demanded one in 2021,[1]^: 6 nor did it have an anti-retaliation policy or an anti-fraternization policy.[4] It cited the USSF's rushed launch of the league, which deprived it of infrastructure, policies, and planning appropriate for a professional sports league despite incidents of harassment, fraternization, and abuse in previous professional and amateur women's and youth soccer leagues in the United States.[1]^: 5–6

The report focused on reports of alleged abuse by three coaches:[1]^: 6–12[4][5]

• Racing Louisville FC and former Sky Blue FC manager and United States women's national soccer team opposition scout Christy Holly, accused of engaging in a romantic relationship with Christie Pearce, who he managed at Sky Blue; alleged sexual harassment and abuse of another player he managed at both Sky Blue and Racing Louisville FC; and verbal and emotional abuse of multiple players across teams[1]^{: 127–157}
• North Carolina Courage and former Western New York Flash and Portland Thorns FC manager Paul Riley, accused of sexual coercion and harassment of multiple players dating back to previous professional leagues, as well as interfering with players' treatment and weight-shaming players[1]^: 49–88
• Chicago Red Stars manager Rory Dames, accused of verbal and emotional abuse of multiple players extending to his time in youth soccer, and inappropriate sexual comments to and relationships with players[1]^: 89–126

The report included detailed allegations of abuse and misconduct, extending beyond sexual abuse and harassment to verbally abusive coaching and insufficient boundaries between staff and players.[6]

It also described a culture of misconduct at clubs, such as then-Thorns head coach Cindy Parlow Cone reporting allegedly sexually harassing comments from Thorns head of business Mike Golub, and Thorns owner Merritt Paulson allegedly attempting to discuss the illicit distribution of a United States women's national team player's nude photographs with Thorns players.[4]

The report alleged that the USSF took no action after United States national team players submitted allegations of abusive behavior by Riley directly to then-USSF president Sunil Gulati and then-manager Jill Ellis, who had forwarded the complaints to USSF then-chief executive officer Dan Flynn, NWSL then-executive director Cheryl Bailey, and NWSL then-general counsel Lisa Levine. It also alleged that Bailey, Gulati, Flynn, USSF counsel Lydia Wahlke, and USSF chief operating officer Jay Berhalter took no action after responses to an anonymous player survey repeated the complaints; and that Plush, Gulati, Flynn, and Levine again took no action after directly receiving a player's detailed report of Riley's behavior, including details omitted by the Thorns from its investigative report, in 2015.[4]

The report further alleged that the Thorns conducted an investigation into multiple player reports of Riley's behavior, but that the Thorns internal investigative report omitted significant details reported by players. The report also noted that the Thorns privately fired Riley but publicly described his exit as a contract non-renewal and thanked him for his service to the team. The report also noted that Thorns and Portland Timbers then-general manager Gavin Wilkinson endorsed him for a new role as manager of the Western New York Flash.[4]

More broadly, the report noted a systemic lack of communication between teams, the NWSL, and USSF of misconduct, and a lack of independent reporting functions for players to effectively escalate their concerns without fear of inaction or retaliation.[4]

The report alleged that players who reported abuse and misbehavior were traded, released, threatened, or otherwise retaliated against, including Mana Shim, Samantha Johnson,[4] Christen Press, and other anonymous players who feared further retaliation if their names were attached to the investigation or subsequent journalistic reporting.[7]

The report also alleged that players, staff, and coaches engaged in inappropriate fraternization that chilled reporting of abuse or normalized it to the point of players being unable to recognize it. The report noted that Riley, Dames, and Holly had all married former players, which further "desensitized the system about power imbalances" and systematically normalized power imbalances that fostered abuse.[4]

The report noted that many teams lacked human resource departments,[4] and that league roster rules and policies led to a lack of job security that enabled retaliation and further chilled player reports of misconduct.[8] The report also suggested that the entities' focus on sustaining the league financially blinded them from addressing these systemic player safety problems.[9]

The report alleged that Portland Thorns FC, Racing Louisville FC, and Chicago Red Stars impeded Yates' investigation, with the Thorns interfering with witness access and using legal arguments to impede access of relevant documents, the Red Stars taking more than eight months to produce relevant documents, and Louisville refusing to provide documents about Holly and using a non-disclosure agreement to justify preventing current and former employee witnesses from answering questions.[5][1]^: 3–4

The report also noted that failures by teams, the league, and the USSF tacitly allowed misconduct to continue, which endangered additional players after the fact and further encouraged retaliation against whistleblowers.[8]

The report also noted that it had received reports beyond the scope of its NWSL investigation that suggested the scope of its systemic abuse issues extended into American youth soccer, where many NWSL coaches had previously worked, or owned, operated, or directed youth clubs. The report suggested the culture of abuse and players' reluctance to report misconduct originated in similar power imbalances at the youth level.[10]

The report found that the league's and USSF's reliance on the United States Center for SafeSport for player safety instead further exposed players to risks.[8]

The report dedicated a separate section of its recommendations to the NWSL's and USSF's intersections with the United States Center for SafeSport.[1]^{: 166–171}

The section suggested that SafeSport's practice of administratively closing most of its investigations without publishing findings or public records or allegations, and a lack of clarity around SafeSport's jurisdictional control, discouraged the NWSL and USSF from taking its own disciplinary actions or sharing details from player allegations internally.[1]^{: 169–170}

Of those (1,509 claims investigated in the year from July 1, 2019, to June 30, 2020, SafeSport) administratively closed 515 cases, put 115 cases on administrative hold, and closed 720 claims based on jurisdiction. Of the 1,509 claims, just 122 led to a formal resolution, whereby SafeSport completed its investigation and either closed the matter or issued a decision finding a violation of the SafeSport Code. In other words, SafeSport reached a formal resolution in just 8 percent of all the cases it investigated during that period.[1]^{: 169–170}

... SafeSport has also instituted an appeals process unlike that even afforded criminal defendants. Rather than reviewing sanctions imposed by the Center for an abuse of discretion, as is required by the SafeSport Code, SafeSport gives respondents the right to what is effectively an entirely new fact-finding process, requiring the claimant to go through the process all over again. As a practical matter, respondents use the right to appeal to take another bite at the apple, in the hope that claimants will not want to rehash their claims.[1]^: 170

The section generated public criticism of SafeSport from journalists who covered the allegations. In October 2022, journalist Sally Jenkins wrote a column in The Washington Post that criticized SafeSport as "a false front … little more than another coverup operation, a litigation-avoidance ploy and bottomless pit into which to dump complaints and disguise inaction."[11] In May 2023, USA Today reporter Nancy Armour noted that six months after the Yates Report's publication, and after 18 months of investigation, SafeSport had lifted USSF's suspension of Dames' coaching license while continuing to investigate him, and USSF president Parlow Cone said SafeSport had refused to share its findings or reasoning with USSF, contra Yates' recommendations. Armour also noted that SafeSport had obstructed USSF's attempts to reform its licensing and vetting processes over jurisdictional concerns, and also suggested contradictions from SafeSport CEO Ju’Riese Colon on whether anyone from SafeSport had been interviewed for the report as Yates had claimed.[12]