Immunological synapse

In immunology, an immunological synapse (or immune synapse) is the interface between an antigen-presenting cell or target cell and a lymphocyte such as a T/B cell or Natural Killer cell. The interface was originally named after the neuronal synapse, with which it shares the main structural pattern.[1] An immunological synapse consists of molecules involved in T cell activation, which compose typical patterns—activation clusters. Immunological synapses are the subject of much ongoing research.[2]

Immunological synapse between Jurkat T cell expressing GFP-actin (green) and Raji B cell stained with CMAC (blue). Synapse formation was induced by Staphylococcal enterotoxin E superantigen.

Structure and function

The immune synapse is also known as the supramolecular activation cluster or SMAC.[3] This structure is composed of concentric rings each containing segregated clusters of proteins—often referred to as the bull’s-eye model of the immunological synapse:

  • c-SMAC (central-SMAC) composed of the θ isoform of protein kinase C,[4] CD2, CD4, CD8, CD28, Lck, and Fyn.[5]
  • p-SMAC (peripheral-SMAC) within which the lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1) and the cytoskeletal protein talin are clustered.[3]
  • d-SMAC (distal-SMAC) enriched in CD43 and CD45 molecules.[6][7]

New investigations, however, have shown that a "bull’s eye" is not present in all immunological synapses. For example, different patterns appear in the synapse between a T-cell and a dendritic cell.[8][9]

This complex as a whole is postulated to have several functions including but not limited to:

  • Regulation of lymphocyte activation[10]
  • Transfer of peptide-MHC complexes from APCs to lymphocytes[10]
  • Directing secretion of cytokines or lytic granules[10]

Recent research has proposed a striking parallel between the immunological synapse and the primary cilium based mainly on similar actin rearrangement, orientation of the centrosome towards the structure and involvement of similar transport molecules (such as IFT20, Rab8, Rab11). This structural and functional homology is the topic of ongoing research.[11][12]

Formation

The initial interaction occurs between LFA-1 present in the p-SMAC of a T-cell, and non-specific adhesion molecules (such as ICAM-1 or ICAM-2) on a target cell. When bound to a target cell, the T-cell can extend pseudopodia and scan the surface of target cell to find a specific peptide:MHC complex.[13][14]

The process of formation begins when the T-cell receptor (TCR) binds to the peptide:MHC complex on the antigen-presenting cell and initiates signaling activation through formation of microclusters/lipid rafts. Specific signaling pathways lead to polarization of the T-cell by orienting its centrosome toward the site of the immunological synapse. The symmetric centripetal actin flow is the basis of formation of the p-SNAP ring. The accumulation and polarization of actin is triggered by TCR/CD3 interactions with integrins and small GTPases (such as Rac1 or Cdc42). These interactions activate large multi-molecular complexes (containing WAVE (Scar), HSP300, ABL2, SRA1, and NAP1 and others) to associate with Arp2/3, which directly promotes actin polymerization. As actin is accumulated and reorganized, it promotes clustering of TCRs and integrins. The process thereby upregulates itself via positive feedback.[1]

Some parts of this process may differ in CD4+ and CD8+ cells. For example, synapse formation is quick in CD8+ T cells, because for CD8+ T cells it is fundamental to eliminate the pathogen quickly. In CD4+ T cells, however, the whole process of the immunological synapse formation can take up to 6 hours.[13][1]

In CD8+ T cells, the synapse formation leads to killing of the target cell via secretion of cytolytic enzymes.[1] CD8+ T lymphocytes contain lytic granules – specialized secretory lysosomes filled with perforin, granzymes, lysosomal hydrolases (for example cathepsins B and D, β-hexosaminidase) and other cytolytic effector proteins. Once these proteins are delivered to the target cell, they induce its apoptosis.[15] The effectivity of killing of the target cell depends on the strength of the TCR signal. Even after receiving weak or short-lived signals, the MTOC polarizes towards the immunological synapse, but in that case the lytic granules are not trafficked and therefore the killing effect is missing or poor.[16]

NK-cell synapse

NK cells are known to form synapses with cytolytic effect towards the target cell. In the initiation step, NK cell approaches the target cell, either accidentally or intentionally due to the chemotactic signalling. Firstly, the sialyl Lewis X present on the surface of target cell is recognized by CD2 on NK cell. If the KIR receptors of NK cell find their cognate antigen on the surface of target cell, formation of the lytic synapse is inhibited.[17] If such signal is missing, a tight adhesion via LFA1 and MAC1 is promoted and enhanced by additional signals such as CD226-ligand and CD96-CD155 interactions.[18]

Lytic granules are secretory organelles filled with perforin, granzymes and other cytolytic enzymes. After initiation of the cell-cell contact, the lytic granules of NK cells move around the microtubules towards the centrosome, which also relocalizes towards the site of synapse. Then, the contents of lytic granules is released and via vesicles with SNARE proteins transferred to the target cell.[19]

Inhibitory immunological synapse of NK cells

When an NK cell encounters a self cell, it forms a so-called inhibitory immunological synapse to prevent unwanted cytolysis of target cell. In this process, the killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) containing long cytoplasmic tails with immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motifs (ITIMs) are clustered in the site of synapse, bind their ligand on the surface of target cell and form the supramolecular inhibitory cluster (SMIC). SMIC then acts to prevent rearrangement of actin, block the recruitment of activatory receptors to the site of synapse and finally, promote detachment from the target cell. This process is essential in protecting NK cells from killing self cells.[17]

History

Immunological synapses were first discovered by Abraham Kupfer at the National Jewish Medical and Research Center in Denver. Their name was coined by Michael Dustin at NYU who studied them in further detail. Daniel M. Davis and Jack Strominger showed structured immune synapses for a different lymphocyte, the Natural Killer cell, and published this around the same time.[20] Abraham Kupfer first presented his findings during one of the Keystone symposia in 1995, when he showed three-dimensional images of immune cells interacting with one another. Key molecules in the synapse are the T cell receptor and its counterpart the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). Also important are LFA-1, ICAM-1, CD28, and CD80/CD86.

References
  1. Ortega-Carrion, Alvaro; Vicente-Manzanares, Miguel (2016-03-31). "Concerning immune synapses: a spatiotemporal timeline". F1000Research. 5: 418. doi:10.12688/f1000research.7796.1. ISSN 2046-1402. PMC 4821290. PMID 27092248.
  2. "What is the importance of the immunological synapse?" (PDF).
  3. Monks CR, Freiberg BA, Kupfer H, Sciaky N, Kupfer A (September 1998). "Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells". Nature. 395 (6697): 82–86. Bibcode:1998Natur.395...82M. doi:10.1038/25764. PMID 9738502. S2CID 4319319.
  4. Monks CR, Kupfer H, Tamir I, Barlow A, Kupfer A (January 1997). "Selective modulation of protein kinase C-theta during T-cell activation". Nature. 385 (6611): 83–86. Bibcode:1997Natur.385...83M. doi:10.1038/385083a0. PMID 8985252. S2CID 4255930.
  5. Lee KH, Holdorf AD, Dustin ML, Chan AC, Allen PM, Shaw AS (February 2002). "T cell receptor signaling precedes immunological synapse formation". Science. 295 (5559): 1539–1542. Bibcode:2002Sci...295.1539L. doi:10.1126/science.1067710. PMID 11859198. S2CID 6601206.
  6. Delon J, Kaibuchi K, Germain RN (November 2001). "Exclusion of CD43 from the immunological synapse is mediated by phosphorylation-regulated relocation of the cytoskeletal adaptor moesin". Immunity. 15 (5): 691–701. doi:10.1016/S1074-7613(01)00231-X. PMID 11728332.
  7. Freiberg BA, Kupfer H, Maslanik W, Delli J, Kappler J, Zaller DM, Kupfer A (October 2002). "Staging and resetting T cell activation in SMACs". Nat. Immunol. 3 (10): 911–917. doi:10.1038/ni836. PMID 12244310. S2CID 2397939.
  8. Tseng, Su-Yi; Waite, Janelle C.; Liu, Mengling; Vardhana, Santosha; Dustin, Michael L. (2008-10-01). "T Cell-Dendritic Cell Immunological Synapses Contain TCR-dependent CD28-CD80 Clusters That Recruit Protein Kinase Cθ". The Journal of Immunology. 181 (7): 4852–4863. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.181.7.4852. ISSN 0022-1767. PMC 2556893. PMID 18802089.
  9. Brossard, Cédric; Feuillet, Vincent; Schmitt, Alain; Randriamampita, Clotilde; Romao, Maryse; Raposo, Graça; Trautmann, Alain (2005-06-01). "Multifocal structure of the T cell – dendritic cell synapse". European Journal of Immunology. 35 (6): 1741–1753. doi:10.1002/eji.200425857. ISSN 1521-4141. PMID 15909310.
  10. Davis, DM; Dustin, ML (June 2004). "What is the importance of the immunological synapse?". Trends in Immunology. 25 (6): 323–7. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.523.189. doi:10.1016/j.it.2004.03.007. PMID 15145322.
  11. Finetti, Francesca; Baldari, Cosima T. (2013-01-01). "Compartmentalization of signaling by vesicular trafficking: a shared building design for the immune synapse and the primary cilium". Immunological Reviews. 251 (1): 97–112. doi:10.1111/imr.12018. ISSN 1600-065X. PMID 23278743. S2CID 28587751.
  12. Finetti, Francesca; Paccani, Silvia Rossi; Riparbelli, Maria Giovanna; Giacomello, Emiliana; Perinetti, Giuseppe; Pazour, Gregory J.; Rosenbaum, Joel L.; Baldari, Cosima T. (November 2009). "Intraflagellar transport is required for polarized recycling of the TCR/CD3 complex to the immune synapse". Nature Cell Biology. 11 (11): 1332–1339. doi:10.1038/ncb1977. ISSN 1476-4679. PMC 2837911. PMID 19855387.
  13. Xie, Jianming; Tato, Cristina M.; Davis, Mark M. (2013-01-01). "How the immune system talks to itself: the varied role of synapses". Immunological Reviews. 251 (1): 65–79. doi:10.1111/imr.12017. ISSN 1600-065X. PMC 3645447. PMID 23278741.
  14. Murphy, Kenneth M. (2011-07-25). Janeway's Immunobiology. Taylor & Francis Group. ISBN 9781136665219.
  15. Jenkins, Misty R; Griffiths, Gillian M (2010). "The synapse and cytolytic machinery of cytotoxic T cells". Current Opinion in Immunology. 22 (3): 308–313. doi:10.1016/j.coi.2010.02.008. PMC 4101800. PMID 20226643.
  16. Jenkins, Misty R.; Tsun, Andy; Stinchcombe, Jane C.; Griffiths, Gillian M. (2009). "The Strength of T Cell Receptor Signal Controls the Polarization of Cytotoxic Machinery to the Immunological Synapse". Immunity. 31 (4): 621–631. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2009.08.024. PMC 2791175. PMID 19833087.
  17. Orange, Jordan S. (September 2008). "Formation and function of the lytic NK-cell immunological synapse". Nature Reviews Immunology. 8 (9): 713–725. doi:10.1038/nri2381. ISSN 1474-1741. PMC 2772177. PMID 19172692.
  18. Martinet, Ludovic; Smyth, Mark J. (April 2015). "Balancing natural killer cell activation through paired receptors". Nature Reviews Immunology. 15 (4): 243–254. doi:10.1038/nri3799. ISSN 1474-1741. PMID 25743219. S2CID 20825600.
  19. Stow, Jennifer L.; Manderson, Anthony P.; Murray, Rachael Z. (2006). "SNAREing immunity: the role of SNAREs in the immune system". Nature Reviews Immunology. 6 (12): 919–929. doi:10.1038/nri1980. PMID 17124513. S2CID 31267022.
  20. Davis DM, Chiu I, Fassett M, Cohen GB, Mandelboim O, Strominger JL (Dec 1999). "The human natural killer cell immune synapse". Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 96 (26): 15062–7. Bibcode:1999PNAS...9615062D. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.26.15062. PMC 24773. PMID 10611338.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.