Sperm granuloma

A sperm granuloma is a lump of leaked sperm that appears along the vasa deferentia or epididymides in vasectomized individuals. While majority of sperm granulomas are present along the vas deferens, the rest of them form at the epididymis. Sperm granulomas range in size, from one millimeter to one centimeter. They consist of a central mass of degenerating sperm surrounded by tissue containing blood vessels and immune system cells.[1] Sperm granulomas may also have a yellow, white, or cream colored center when cut open. While some sperm granulomas can be painful, most of them are painless and asymptomatic.[2] Sperm granulomas can appear as a result of surgery (such as a vasectomy), trauma, or an infection (such as sexually transmitted diseases).[3] They can appear as early as four days after surgery and fully formed ones can appear as late as 208 days later.[4]

Post-traumatic leakage of sperm provoking a granulomatous reaction.

Sperm granulomas are a common complication of different types of vasectomy. In vasectomies, the vas deferens are cut and the two ends are tied to prevent sperm from passing. Sperm granuloma may then form at the point where the vas deferens were cut, due to the possibility of sperm leaking out at this site. History of trauma or inflammation of the epididymis can also lead to a sperm granuloma.[2] Sperm granulomas are seen as the body's immune response to sperm being outside of their normal location, and are therefore seen as a protective mechanism.

Sperm granulomas are quite common after surgery, occurring in up to 40% of patients. On the contrary, sperm granulomas comprise only 2.5% of the general population.[5] Amongst adolescents and pediatric patients, sperm granulomas are considered a rare phenomenon as this population does not undergo vasectomy often. The most common cause of sperm granuloma in pediatric and adolescent patients is often attributed to tumor obstruction, injury, or infection to the area.[5]

While sperm granuloma is considered a complication in most cases, it allows decompression of the vas deferens and epididymis at the vasectomy site. This allows for successful future reversal of vasectomy given the good quality sperm in the vas fluid. Any surgery in the genital area can lead to castration anxiety (fear of loss or damage to the genital organ.)[6]

Diagnosis

Sperm granulomas are diagnosed using a microscope to examine tissues (histology) taken from the area, typically done with fine needle aspiration and occur within a few weeks of a vasectomy.[7] An example of a histology based diagnosis supporting sperm granuloma would be a sperm core surrounded by inflammatory cells, apoptotic cells, and fibrous tissue. Often, there will be empty tubes with cellular debris near the granuloma.[2] Additionally, physicians might use high frequency ultrasounds to aid in properly diagnosing epididymal conditions such as sperm granulomas.[8] Using these ultrasounds provide a better view of the anatomy of the epididymis, which could prevent misdiagnosis of conditions such as testicular tumors or supernumerary testis (the presence of more than two testes).[8]

Signs and symptoms

Sperm granulomas appear as hard and firm nodules that do not exceed 1 cm in size. Sperm granulomas form in 20-50% of vasectomy procedures.[6] An injury to the epididymal epithelium is caused by penetration of germ cells into the epididymal supportive tissue. This infiltration of germ cells allows for the pathogenesis of sperm granulomas. Moreover, the penetration of germ cells leads to inflammatory and autoimmune reactions that further increase the risk of sperm granuloma formation.[2]

Sperm granuloma can also mimic the presence of an abnormal number of testis on ultrasound.[9]

Sperm granulomas are mostly asymptomatic.[4] However, they can cause pain and swelling of the epididymis, spermatic cord, and testis. The pain usually radiates to the groin, the junctional area between the abdominal wall and the thigh, and can imitate the feeling of kidney spasms.[10]

Development of a Sperm Granuloma

Sperm granuloma is a common complication of vasectomy.[2] Vasectomies are a common, effective procedure for sterilization of individuals assigned male at birth. History of trauma or epididymitis can also lead to sperm granuloma. In vasectomies, the vas deferens are cut and the two ends are tied to prevent sperm from passing. Sperm granuloma may then grow at the point where the vas deferens were cut.[2] This could happen two to three weeks post procedure. Sperm granuloma can also form from sperm leaking from the vas deferens into the surrounding interstitium. Leakage of sperm elicits an immune response which can lead to chronic inflammation. A histological examination can confirm a sperm granuloma by checking for inflammatory markers such as macrophages and lymphocytes surrounding the sperm core.[2]

Treatment and prevention

Most sperm granulomas are asymptomatic and absorbed over time. However, in more severe cases, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as Ibuprofen may be used.

Surgery is very rarely performed. In cases where symptoms do not resolve in a reasonable amount of time and NSAID therapy is ineffective, the provider may choose to surgically resect the area where the pain is localized. Additionally, the stumps of the vas deferens can be burned and closed off in order to reduce the pain the patient is experiencing and prevent it from happening again.[11]

When sperm granulomas are occasionally mistaken for other conditions, such as testicular tumors, a more complicated treatment approach such as an orchiectomy may be accidentally used.[12]

Cauterization is a vasectomy method used to seal the vas deferens by utilizing heat or electricity to burn the lumen. Using thermal (heat) cautery instead of electrocautery can help prevent granulomas and nodular thickening.[2]

Refraining from ejaculation for 1 week can potentially reduce the risk of developing a sperm granuloma.[2]

There is also evidence that sperm granuloma formation may be linked to testosterone deficiency. Testosterone supplementation may reduce the inflammation related to sperm granulomas and potentially even prevent them from occurring.[2] However, this evidence is only supported in animal models.

Complications

There have been complications involving sperm granuloma. A pediatric case documented a 13 year old boy who was admitted to the hospital with edema and redness on his left hemiscrotum.[13] Upon a physical examination, they found the scrotum to be enlarged, soft, red and painless. Initial sonographs detected possiblility of inflammation of the testis and epididymis. The patient received anti-inflammatory and antibiotic treatment, and was examined again one week after treatment.[13] The testis were still painless and now hardened. Upon a second reexamination five days later, low perfusion to the testis was detected. This testicular necrosis led the patient into an emergency operation. Histology determined there was a ruptured sperm granuloma that led to the testicular thrombosis and necrosis.[13] Specifically, the walls of the vas deferens contained many growths of small ducts and gland-like structures, which came about as a response to the displacement of the sperm and fluid. The exact cause of his ruptured sperm granuloma was not determined, but it was found to be most likely a secondary response to inflammation and/or trauma.[13]

Another complication with Sperm granulomas has been being mistaken for a tumor due to its tumor-like appearance.[14] A 45 year old man presented with right testicular chronic pain. He had a vasectomy 7 years ago. Upon physical examination and an ultrasound, a solid nodule in the right epididymis was found, and medical staff suspected a tumor. After findings of sperm that had undergone phagocytosis, a final diagnosis of sperm granuloma was determined. [14]

Effects on sperm quality and fertility

It is unknown whether sperm granulomas are definitively detrimental to sperm quality and fertility in humans. However, studies in donkeys have shown that sperm quality is only marginally affected. There was a lower percentage of sperm with intact plasma membranes; however, no effects on motility or morphology were observed.[15] In some cases, the presence or absence of sperm granulomas may determine the success rate for vasectomy reversal.

It is believed that sperm granulomas may be protective because they can prevent the obstruction of the testicles and epididymis.[16] Sperm granulomas are believed to reduce the pressure that's generated after vasectomy and prevent blockages of sperm output into the vas fluid during ejaculation. Therefore, there are no changes in the amount of sperm that are produced into the vas fluid.[16]

Sperm granulomas in animals

Additionally, sperm granulomas can exist in non-human species such as rats, dogs, horses, fish, etc. Non-human species exhibit the same causes for sperm granulomas, including infection, injury, and trauma to the epididymal region. For example, vasectomized rats were seen to also have high prevalence of sperm granulomas post-operation while general populations of rats experienced much lower prevalence of sperm granulomas.[17] In the case of sperm granulomas within dogs, their presence is common amongst poorly performed vasectomies.[12] This is consistent with the idea that these lesions form at the site where there is trauma or a chance for the sperm to leak outside of the vasa deferentia or epididymis. In multiple species, sperm granulomas have also been linked to the success rate of certain procedures such as vasectomy reversals, or vasovasostomy.[12] There is also an association between sperm granuloma and antibodies produced against sperm antigens. In a case study on sperm granuloma and antisperm antibody count in donkeys, it was found that sperm granuloma resulted in an increase in IgA- and IgG- bound sperm in donkeys. They also found donkeys with sperm granuloma had a reduction of sperm motility and reduction of percentage of sperm with an intact plasma membrane. But there was no significant damage found in total sperm motility compared to healthy control donkeys. The extent to which sperm granuloma and antisperm antibodies affect donkey fertility is still yet to be determined by further research studies.

Vasectomy

Vasectomy (a birth control for males that cuts the sperm supply to semen) is usually a safe and effective contraception method. It has less than 1% failure rate and more than 95% success rate. Best candidates for vasectomy are older than 30 years individuals assigned male at birth who are in a stable relationship. Vasectomy is best performed when using the no-scalpel method to reduce operative complications. Needles also can be avoided by using a jet injector instead for the local anesthesia, which also reduces the pain that results from needles. Complications of vasectomy depends on the methods and tools used. Complications include short-term complications, such as Infection and bleeding, or long-term complications, such as sperm granuloma and post-vasectomy pain syndrome. [16]

Additionally, in order to check sterility post-vasectomy, a semen analysis is performed after 3 months and 20 ejaculations to establish azoospermia (no sperm count in the ejaculate).[16]

Vasectomy can also be reversed, which is a more technically challenging procedure than a vasectomy that is performed by less urologists and is a heavier financial burden as it is usually not covered by insurances.[18] Approximately 3-6% of people opt for a reversal due to the death of a child, change in partner, increase in financial abilities, or to find relief from postvasectomy pain syndrome. With advances in medical operations since the 1970s, there has since been increased interest in vasectomy reversals and greater chances of success for patency and pregnancy rates.[18]

Vasectomy reversal has a varying success rate. A recent study showed that the most important indicator of pregnancy after vasectomy reversal was the age of the female partner. The two most favorable predictors of success were having a female partner less than 40 years of age and having the reversal performed less than 15 years after vasectomy.[19] Aside from the variation in success, vasectomy reversal also has major economic implications. The cost of a vasectomy reversal can range from $16,000-$30,000 and it is usually an out-of-pocket expense due to lack of insurance coverage.[20]

References

  1. McDonald SW (2000). "Cellular responses to vasectomy". International Review of Cytology. 199: 295–339. doi:10.1016/s0074-7696(00)99006-5. ISBN 9780123646033. PMID 10874581.
  2. Yang F, Li J, Dong L, Tan K, Huang X, Zhang P, et al. (July 2021). "Review of Vasectomy Complications and Safety Concerns". The World Journal of Men's Health. 39 (3): 406–418. doi:10.5534/wjmh.200073. PMC 8255399. PMID 32777870.
  3. Deane LA, Suding PN, Lekawa ME, Narula N, McDougall EM (June 2007). "Sperm granuloma of the inguinal vas deferens mimicking recurrent incarcerated inguinal hernia". Urology. 69 (6): 1209.e1–1209.e3. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.046. PMID 17572223.
  4. Gade J, Brasso K (August 1990). "[Sperm granulomata]". Ugeskrift for Laeger. 152 (32): 2282–2284. PMID 2205035.
  5. Theisen K, Chaudhry R, Davis A, Cannon G (December 2016). "Epididymal Inflammatory Pseudotumor With Downstream Sperm Granuloma in an Adolescent Patient: A Case Report and Review of the Literature". Urology. 98: 158–160. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2016.06.003. PMID 27292565.
  6. Qureshi F (October 1984). "Vasectomy". Australian Family Physician. 13 (10): 734–5, 737. PMID 6508643.
  7. Shashidhar HB, Vani D, Sushma S, Bharathi M, Kumar BD, Rupashree S (2012-06-30). "Diagnosis of spermatic granuloma by fine needle aspiration". Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences. 1 (2): 60–63. doi:10.14260/jemds/10. ISSN 2278-4748.
  8. Lee JC, Bhatt S, Dogra VS (March 2008). "Imaging of the epididymis". Ultrasound Quarterly. 24 (1): 3–16. doi:10.1097/RUQ.0b013e318168f116. PMID 18362528. S2CID 37488407.
  9. Su JS, Farber NJ, Feldman MK, Vij SC (March 2020). "Sperm granuloma masquerading as a supernumerary testis". Urology Case Reports. 29: 101080. doi:10.1016/j.eucr.2019.101080. PMC 6906707. PMID 31867216.
  10. van den Berg JC, de Valois JC, Go PM, Rosenbusch G (2000-03-01). "Radiological anatomy of the groin region". European Radiology. 10 (4): 661–670. doi:10.1007/s003300050980. PMID 10795551. S2CID 28806536.
  11. Liu XZ, Li SQ. Complications and Long-Term Safety of Vasectomy. J Int Reprod Health Fam Plan. 2009;28:390-393.
  12. Fletcher CD (2021). "Tumors and Tumor-like Conditions of the Male Genital Tract". Diagnostic Histopathology of Tumors (5): 913–1090 via Elsevier Science Direct.
  13. Velaoras K, Plataras C, Alexandrou I, Bourikis G, Chorti M, Christianakis E (January 2019). "Testicular necrosis due to complicated epididymitis and ruptured sperm granuloma in a 13-year-old boy". Journal of Surgical Case Reports. 2019 (1): rjy349. doi:10.1093/jscr/rjy349. PMC 6319168. PMID 30631422.
  14. Garrido-Abad P, Díaz-Menéndez A, García-Martín L, Senra-Bravo I, Fernández-Arjona M (June 2019). "Tumor-like appearance of Spermatic Granuloma". International Braz J Urol. 45 (3): 634–636. doi:10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2018.0676. PMC 6786097. PMID 30901170.
  15. Podico G, Lago-Alvarez Y, Carossino M, Ferrer MS, Arnold CE, Canisso IF (June 2021). "Epididymal Sperm Granuloma and Antisperm Antibodies in Donkeys". Journal of Equine Veterinary Science. 101: 103450. doi:10.1016/j.jevs.2021.103450. PMID 33993945. S2CID 233652618.
  16. Rayala BZ, Viera AJ (December 2013). "Common questions about vasectomy". American Family Physician. 88 (11): 757–761. PMID 24364523.
  17. Caldwell JC, McGadey J, Kerr R, Bennett NK, McDonald SW (1996). "Cell recruitment to the sperm granuloma which follows vasectomy in the rat". Clinical Anatomy. 9 (5): 302–308. doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-2353(1996)9:5<302::aid-ca3>3.0.co;2-e. PMID 8842537. S2CID 34847249.
  18. Patel AP, Smith RP (2016). "Vasectomy reversal: a clinical update". Asian Journal of Andrology. 18 (3): 365–371. doi:10.4103/1008-682X.175091. PMC 4854082. PMID 26975488.
  19. Magheli A, Rais-Bahrami S, Kempkensteffen C, Weiske WH, Miller K, Hinz S (October 2010). "Impact of obstructive interval and sperm granuloma on patency and pregnancy after vasectomy reversal". International Journal of Andrology. 33 (5): 730–735. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2605.2009.01007.x. PMID 19906186.
  20. Garceau L, Henderson J, Davis LJ, Petrou S, Henderson LR, McVeigh E, et al. (December 2002). "Economic implications of assisted reproductive techniques: a systematic review". Human Reproduction. 17 (12): 3090–3109. doi:10.1093/humrep/17.12.3090. PMID 12456608.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.