Carpenter ant

Carpenter ants (Camponotus spp.) are large (0.3 to 1 in or 8 to 25 mm) ants indigenous to many forested parts of the world.[2]

Carpenter ant
Temporal range: Eocene – Recent
Camponotus sp. (worker)
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Arthropoda
Class: Insecta
Order: Hymenoptera
Family: Formicidae
Subfamily: Formicinae
Tribe: Camponotini
Genus: Camponotus
Mayr, 1861
Type species
Formica ligniperda
Latreille, 1802
Diversity
> 1,000 species
Synonyms[1]
  • Condylomyrma Santschi, 1928
  • Dolophra Wu, J. & Wang, 1994
  • Myrmocamelus Forel, 1914
  • Myrmolophus Emery, 1920
  • Myrmosaga Forel, 1912
  • Myrmoturba Forel, 1912
  • Neocolobopsis Borgmeier, 1928
  • Neomyrmamblys Wheeler, W.M., 1921
  • Orthonotus Ashmead, 1905
  • Paleosminthurus Pierce & Gibron, 1962
  • Paracolobopsis Emery, 1920
  • Shanwangella Zhang, J., 1989

They build nests inside wood consisting of galleries chewed out with their mandibles, preferably in dead, damp wood. However, unlike termites, they do not consume wood,[3] discarding a material that resembles sawdust. Sometimes, carpenter ants hollow out sections of trees. They also commonly infest wooden buildings and structures, and are a widespread nuisance and major cause of structural damage. Nevertheless, their ability to excavate wood helps in forest decomposition. The genus includes over 1,000 species.[4] They also farm aphids. In the farming, the ants protect the aphids while they excrete a sugary fluid called honeydew, which the ants get by stroking the aphids with their antennae.

Habitat

Carpenter ant cleaning antennae

Carpenter ant species reside both outdoors and indoors in moist, decaying, or hollow wood, most commonly in forest environments. They cut "galleries" into the wood grain to provide passageways to allow for movement between different sections of the nest. Certain parts of a house, such as around and under windows, roof eaves, decks and porches, are more likely to be infested by carpenter ants because these areas are most vulnerable to moisture.

Carpenter ants carrying a dead bee

Carpenter ants have been known to construct extensive underground tunneling systems. These systems often lead to an end at some food source – often aphid colonies, where the ants extract and feed on honeydew. These tunneling systems also often exist in trees. The colonies typically include a central "parent" colony surrounded and supplemented by smaller satellite colonies.[5]

Food

A major worker of Camponotus sp.

Carpenter ants are considered both predators and scavengers. These ants are foragers that typically eat parts of other dead insects or substances derived from other insects. Common foods for them include insect parts, "honeydew" produced by aphids, or extrafloral nectar from plants. They are also known for eating other sugary liquids such as honey, syrup, or juices. Carpenter ants can increase the survivability of aphids when they tend them. They tend many aphid species but can also express preference for specific ones.

Most species of carpenter ants forage at night. When foraging, they usually collect and consume dead insects. Some species less commonly collect live insects. When they discover a dead insect, workers surround it and extract its bodily fluids to be carried back to the nest. The remaining chitin-based shell is left behind. Occasionally, the ants bring the chitinous head of the insect back to the nest, where they also extract its inner tissue.[6] The ants can forage individually or in small or large groups, though they often opt to do so individually. Different colonies in close proximity may have overlapping foraging regions, although they typically do not assist each other in foraging. Their main food sources normally include proteins and carbohydrates.[7] Instances of carpenter ants bleeding Chinese elm trees for the sap have been observed in the northern Arizona region. These instances may be rare as the colonies vastly exceeded the standard size of carpenter ant colonies elsewhere.[8] When workers find food sources, they communicate this information to the rest of the nest. They use biochemical pheromones to mark the shortest path that can be taken from the nest to the source. When a sizable number of workers follows this trail, the strength of the cue increases and a foraging trail is established. This ends when the food source is depleted. The workers will then feed the queen and the larvae by consuming the food they have found, and regurgitating (trophallaxis) the food at the nest. Foraging trails can either be under or above ground.[9]

Although carpenter ants do not tend to be extremely aggressive, they have developed mechanisms to maximize their provision from a food source when that same food source is visited by a competing organism. This is accomplished in different ways. Sometimes they colonize an area near a relatively static food supply. More often, they develop a systemic way to visit the food source with alternating trips by different individual ants or groups. This allows them to decrease the gains of intruders because the intruders tend to visit in a scattered, random, and unorganized manner. The ants, however, visit the sources systematically such that they lower the mean standing crop. They tend to visit more resource-dense food areas in an attempt to minimize resource availability for others. That is, the more systematic the foraging behavior of the ants, the more random that of its competitors.[10]

Contrary to popular belief, carpenter ants do not actually eat wood because they are unable to digest cellulose. They only create tunnels and nests within it.[11]

Symbionts

All ants in this genus, and some related genera, possess an obligate bacterial endosymbiont called Blochmannia.[12] This bacterium has a small genome, and retains genes to biosynthesize essential amino acids and other nutrients. This suggests the bacterium plays a role in ant nutrition. Many Camponotus species are also infected with Wolbachia, another endosymbiont that is widespread across insect groups. Wolbachia is associated with the nurse cells in the queen's ovaries in the species Camponotus textor, which results in the worker larva being infected.[13]

Behavior and ecology

Nesting

Carpenter ants in a tree
Holes in a tree from carpenter ants
Sawdust like shavings from carpenter ants

Carpenter ants work to build the nests that house eggs in environments with usually high humidity due to their sensitivity to environmental humidity. These nests are called primary nests. Satellite nests are constructed once the primary nest is established and has begun to mature. Residents of satellite nests include older larvae, pupae, and some winged individuals. Only eggs, the newly hatched larvae, workers, and the queen reside in the primary nests. As satellite nests do not have environmentally sensitive eggs, the ants can construct them in rather diverse locations that can actually be relatively dry.[14] Some species, like Camponotus vagus, build the nest in a dry place, usually in wood.

Nuptial flight

When conditions are warm and humid, winged males and females participate in a nuptial flight. They emerge from their satellite nests and females mate with a number of males while in flight. The males die after mating. These newly fertilized queens discard their wings and search for new areas to establish primary nests. The queens build new nests and deposit around 20 eggs, nurturing them as they grow until worker ants emerge. The worker ants eventually assist her in caring for the brood as she lays more eggs. After a few years, reproductive winged ants are born, allowing for the making of new colonies. Again, satellite nests will be established and the process will repeat itself.[14]

Relatedness

Relatedness is the probability that a gene in one individual is an identical copy, by descent, of a gene in another individual. It is essentially a measure of how closely related two individuals are with respect to a gene. It is quantified by the coefficient of relatedness, which is a number between zero and one. The larger the value, the more two individuals are "related". Carpenter ants are social hymenopteran insects. This means the relatedness between offspring and parents is disproportionate. Females are more closely related to their sisters than they are to their offspring. Between full sisters, the coefficient of relatedness is r > 0.75 (due to their haplodiploid genetic system). Between parent and offspring, the coefficient of relatedness is r = 0.5, because, given the event in meiosis, a certain gene has a 50% chance of being passed on to the offspring. The level of relatedness is an important dictator of individual interactions.

Genetic diversity

Eusocial insects tend to present low genetic diversity within colonies, which can increase with the co-occurrence of multiple queens (polygyny) or with multiple mating by a single queen (polyandry).[15] Distinct reproductive strategies may generate similar patterns of genetic diversity in ants.[15]

Kin recognition

According to Hamilton's rule for relatedness, for relative-specific interactions to occur, such as kin altruism, a high level of relatedness is necessary between two individuals. Carpenter ants, like many social insect species, have mechanisms by which individuals determine whether others are nestmates or not. They are useful because they explain the presence or absence of altruistic behavior between individuals. They also act as evolutionary strategies to help prevent incest and promote kin selection.[16] Social carpenter ants recognize their kin in many ways. These methods of recognition are largely chemical in nature, and include environmental odors, pheromones, "transferable labels", and labels from the queen that are distributed to and among nest members.[17] Because they have a chemical basis for emission and recognition, odors are useful because many ants can detect such changes in their environment through their antennae.[18] This allows acceptance of nestmates and rejection of non-nestmates.

The process of recognition for carpenter ants requires two events. First, a cue must be present on a "donor animal". These cues are called "labels". Next, the receiving animal must be able to recognize and process the cue. In order for an individual carpenter ant to be recognized as a nestmate, it must, as an adult, go through specific interactions with older members of the nest.[17] This process is also necessary in order for the ant to recognize and distinguish other individuals. If these interactions do not occur in the beginning of adult life, the ant will be unable to be distinguished as a nestmate and unable to distinguish nestmates.[19]

Kin altruism

Recognition allows for the presence of kin-specific interactions, such as kin altruism. Altruistic individuals increase other individuals' fitness at the expense of their own. Carpenter ants perform altruistic actions toward their nestmates so that their shared genes are propagated more readily or more often. In many social insect species like these ants, many worker animals are sterile and do not have the ability to reproduce. As a result, they forgo reproduction to donate energy and help the fertile individuals reproduce.

Pheromones

As in most other social insect species, individual interaction is heavily influenced by the queen. The queen can influence individuals with odors called pheromones, which can have different effects. Some pheromones have been known to calm workers, while others have been known to excite them. Pheromonal cues from ovipositing queens have a stronger effect on worker ants than those of virgin queens.[20]

Social immunity

In many social insect species, social behavior can increase the disease resistance of animals. This phenomenon, called social immunity, exists in carpenter ants. It is mediated through the feeding of other individuals by regurgitation. The regurgitate can have antimicrobial activity, which would be spread amongst members of the colony. Some proteases with antimicrobial activity have been found to exist in regurgitated material. Communal sharing of immune response capability is likely to play a large role in colonial maintenance during highly pathogenic periods.[21]

Polygyny

Polygyny often is associated with many social insect species, and usually is characterized by limited mating flights, small queen size, and other characteristics. However, carpenter ants have "extensive" mating flights and relatively large queens, distinguishing them from polygynous species. Carpenter ants are described as oligogynous because they have a number of fertile queens which are intolerant of each other and must therefore spread to different areas of the nest. Some aggressive interactions have been known to take place between queens, but not necessarily through workers. Queens become aggressive mainly to other queens if they trespass on a marked territory. Queens in a given colony can work together in brood care[5] and the workers tend to experience higher rates of survival in colonies with multiple queens. Some researchers still subscribe to the notion that carpenter ant colonies are only monogynous.[22]

Exploding ants

A winged Carpenter ant in West Bengal, India.

In at least nine Southeast Asian species of the Cylindricus complex, including Camponotus saundersi, workers feature greatly enlarged mandibular glands that run the entire length of the ant's body. They can release their contents suicidally by performing autothysis, thereby rupturing the ant's body and spraying toxic substance from the head, which gives these species the common name "exploding ants."[23][24][25] The enlarged mandibular gland, which is many times the size of that of a normal ant, produces a glue. The glue bursts out and entangles and immobilizes all nearby victims.[26][27]

The termite species Globitermes sulphureus has a similar defensive system.[28]

Selected species

C. pennsylvanicus, winged male
C. crispulus queen
Wood damage by C. herculeanus
This structural board was destroyed by carpenter ants. They left the dense "late wood" of each growth ring intact, to use as galleries.
A closeup of carpenter ant created galleries.
  • Camponotus aeneopilosus Mayr, 1862 – golden tail sugar ant
  • Camponotus amaurus (Espadaler, 1997)
  • Camponotus americanus
  • Camponotus anderseni
  • Camponotus atriceps – Florida carpenter ant (cf. C. floridanus)
  • Camponotus bishamon
  • Camponotus chromaiodes – red carpenter ant
  • Camponotus cinctellus – shiny sugar ant
  • Camponotus compressus (Fabricius, 1787)
  • Camponotus consobrinus – banded sugar ant
  • Camponotus crassus Mayr, 1862
  • Camponotus cruentatus (Latreille, 1802)
  • Camponotus daitoensis
  • Camponotus detritus Emery, 1886 – Namib Desert dune ant
  • Camponotus empedocles – glossy sugar ant
  • Camponotus fellah (Dalla Torre, 1983)
  • Camponotus ferrugineus – red carpenter ant
  • Camponotus festinatus (Buckley, 1866)
  • Camponotus flavomarginatus Mayr, 1862
  • Camponotus floridanus, Florida carpenter ant, genome 90% sequenced[29]
  • Camponotus haroi (Espadaler, 1997)
  • Camponotus herculeanus (Linnaeus, 1758) – Hercules ant
  • Camponotus japonicus Mayr, 1866 – Japanese carpenter ant
  • Camponotus kaura
  • Camponotus ligniperda, a common species in Europe
  • Camponotus modoc Wheeler, W. M., 1910 – western carpenter ant
  • Camponotus monju
  • Camponotus nearcticus (Emery) – smaller carpenter ant
  • Camponotus nigriceps (Smith, 1858) – black-headed sugar ant
  • Camponotus novaeboracensis
  • Camponotus pennsylvanicus (DeGeer) – black carpenter ant
  • Camponotus reburrus Mackay, in Mackay & Barriga, 2012
  • Camponotus punctulatus (Mayr) – Tacuru ant
  • Camponotus saundersi
  • Camponotus schmitzi Stärke, 1933 – diving ant
  • Camponotus sericeiventris
  • Camponotus sericeus
  • Camponotus silvestrii Emery, 1906
  • Camponotus taino
  • Camponotus tortuganus (Emery) – Tortugas carpenter ant
  • Camponotus triodiae
  • Camponotus universitatis Forel, 1890
  • Camponotus vagus Scopoli, 1763
  • Camponotus variegatus (Smith, F., 1858) – Hawaiian carpenter ant

Relationship with humans

One of the most familiar species associated with human habitation in the United States is the black carpenter ant (Camponotus pennsylvanicus).

As pests

Carpenter ants can damage wood used in the construction of buildings. They can leave behind a sawdust-like material called frass that provides clues to their nesting location. Carpenter ant galleries are smooth and very different from termite-damaged areas, which have mud packed into the hollowed-out areas. Carpenter ants can be identified by the general presence of one upward protruding node, looking like a spike, at the "waist" attachment between the thorax and abdomen (petiole).[30] Control involves application of insecticides in various forms including dusts and liquids. The dusts are injected directly into galleries and voids where the carpenter ants are living. The liquids are applied in areas where foraging ants are likely to pick the material up and spread the poison to the colony upon returning.[31]

As food

Honeypot ants in Northern Territory, Australia

Carpenter ants and their larvae are eaten in various parts of the world. In Australia, the Honeypot ant (Camponotus inflatus) is regularly eaten raw by Indigenous Australians.[32] It is a particular favourite source of sugar for Australian Aborigines living in arid regions, partially digging up their nests instead of digging them up entirely, in order to preserve this food source.[33][34] In North America, lumbermen during the early years in Maine would eat carpenter ants to prevent scurvy,[35] and in John Muir's publication, First Summer in the Sierra, Muir notes that the Northern Paiute people of California ate the tickling, acid gasters of the large jet-black carpenter ants.[36] In Africa, carpenter ants are among a vast number of species that are consumed by the San people.[37]

References

  1. Johnson, Norman F. (December 19, 2007). "Camponotus Mayr". Hymenoptera Name Server version 1.5. Columbus, Ohio, USA: Ohio State University. Archived from the original on April 16, 2015. Retrieved April 1, 2015.
  2. Cranshaw, Whitney; Richard Redak (2013). Bugs Rule!: An Introduction to the World of Insects. Princeton Univ. Press. p. 329. ISBN 978-1-4008-4892-8.
  3. "Carpenter ants: Insects: University of Minnesota Extension". Extension.umn.edu. 2012-10-15. Archived from the original on 2012-06-09. Retrieved 2015-05-12.
  4. Feldhaar, H.; Straka, Josef; Krischke, M; Berthold, K; Stoll, S; Mueller, M.J.; Gross, R; et al. (2007). "Nutritional upgrading for omnivorous carpenter ants by the endosymbiont Blochmannia". BMC Biology. 5 (1): 48. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-5-48. PMC 2206011. PMID 17971224.
  5. Colony Size and Polygyny in Carpenter Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Roger D. Akre, Laurel D. Hansen and Elizabeth A. Myhre Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society , Vol. 67, No. 1 (January 1994), pp. 1–9
  6. Pricer, John. The Life History of the Carpenter Ant. Biological Bulletin , Vol. 14, No. 3 (Feb., 1908), pp. 177-218
  7. Yamamoto, Marcela & Del-Claro, Kleber (2008). "Natural history and foraging behavior of the carpenter ant Camponotus sericeiventris Guérin, 1838 (Formicinae, Campotonini) in the Brazilian tropical savanna". Acta Ethologica. 11 (2): 55–65. doi:10.1007/s10211-008-0041-6. S2CID 37065825.
  8. B.Colyott, firsthand observation over a several year period.
  9. Dreisig, H. (2000). "Defense by exploitation in the Florida carpenter ant, Camponotus floridanus, at an extrafloral nectar resource". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 47 (4): 274–279. doi:10.1007/s002650050666. S2CID 44043578.
  10. "Carpenter Ants: 3 Consistent Patterns That Make Their Competition's Foraging More Unpredictable". 1999. Archived from the original on 2016-09-15. Retrieved 2016-09-03.
  11. Hahn, Jeff. "Carpenter Ants": Insects: University of Minnesota Extension. N.p., n.d. Web. October 1, 2013.
  12. Feldhaar, Heike; Straka, Josef; Krischke, Markus; Berthold, Kristina; Stoll, Sascha; Mueller, Martin J; Gross, Roy (2007). "Nutritional upgrading for omnivorous carpenter ants by the endosymbiont Blochmannia". BMC Biology. 5 (1): 48. doi:10.1186/1741-7007-5-48. PMC 2206011. PMID 17971224.
  13. Ramalho, Manuela Oliviera; Vieira, Alexsandro Santana; Pereira, Mayara Cristina; Moreau, Corrie Saux; Bueno, Odair Correa (2018). "Transovarian Transmission of Blochmannia and Wolbachia Endosymbionts in the Neotropical Weaver Ant Camponotus textor (Hymenoptera, Formicidae)". Current Microbiology. 75 (7): 866–873. doi:10.1007/s00284-018-1459-3. hdl:11449/175908. PMID 29468305. S2CID 3387710. Retrieved 2021-06-09.
  14. Pararas — Carayannis, Carolyn. "Carpenter Ants". Colony Behaviors of Carpenter Ants. Web. October 1, 2013.
  15. Azevedo-Silva, Marianne; Mori, Gustavo M.; Carvalho, Carolina S.; Côrtes, Marina C.; Souza, Anete P.; Oliveira, Paulo S. (2020). "Breeding systems and genetic diversity in tropical carpenter ant colonies: different strategies for similar outcomes in Brazilian Cerrado savanna". Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 190 (3): 1020–1035. doi:10.1093/zoolinnean/zlaa035.
  16. Crozier, Ross H. (1988). "Kin Recognition Using Innate Labels: A Central Role for Piggybacking?". Invertebrate Historecognition. pp. 143–156. doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-1053-2_11. ISBN 978-1-4612-8311-9.
  17. Carlin, Norman F.; Schwartz, Peter H. (July 1989). "Pre-imaginal experience and nestmate brood recognition in the carpenter ant, Camponotus floridanus". Animal Behaviour. 38 (1): 89–95. doi:10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80068-5. S2CID 53150854.
  18. Carlin, N. F.; Hölldobler, B. (2 December 1983). "Nestmate and kin recognition in interspecific mixed colonies of ants". Science. 222 (4627): 1027–1029. Bibcode:1983Sci...222.1027C. doi:10.1126/science.222.4627.1027. PMID 17776248. S2CID 38728014.
  19. Morel, Laurence; Vander Meer, Robert K.; Lavine, Barry K. (1988). "Ontogeny of nestmate recognition cues in the red carpenter ant (Camponotus floridanus)". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 22 (3): 175. doi:10.1007/BF00300567. S2CID 43987360.
  20. H.G. Fowler and R. B. Roberts Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, Vol. 55, No. 3 (July 1982), pp. 568–570
  21. Hamilton, C; Lejeune, B. T.; Rosengaus, R. B. (2011). "Trophallaxis and prophylaxis: social immunity in the carpenter ant Camponotus pennsylvanicus". Biology Letters. 7 (1): 89–92. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2010.0466. PMC 3030872. PMID 20591850.
  22. Gadau, Jürgen; Gertsch, Pia J.; Heinze, Jürgen; Pamilo, Pekka; Hölldobler, Bert (1998). "Oligogyny by unrelated queens in the carpenter ant, Camponotus ligniperdus". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 44 (1): 23–33. doi:10.1007/s002650050511. JSTOR 4601542. S2CID 20368901.
  23. Jones, T.H.; Clark, D.A.; Edwards, A.A.; Davidson, D.W.; Spande, T.F.; Snelling; Roy, R. (2004). "The Chemistry of Exploding Ants, Camponotus spp. (Cylindricus complex)"". Journal of Chemical Ecology. 30 (8): 1479–1492. doi:10.1023/B:JOEC.0000042063.01424.28. PMID 15537154. S2CID 23756265.
  24. Emery, Carlo (1889). Viaggio di Leonardo Fea in Birmania e regioni vicine. XX. Formiche di Birmania e del Tenasserim raccolte da Leonardo Fea (1885–87). Annali del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale Giacomo Doria (Genova) 2 7(27): 485–520. [PDF]
  25. "Utahn enters world of exploding ants". Deseret News. September 11, 2002. Archived from the original on July 9, 2010. Retrieved September 27, 2009. University of Utah graduate student Steve Cook explained "They've been called kamikaze ants by other researchers because they tend to explode or self-destruct when they're attacked or harassed in any way."
  26. Vittachi, Nury (June 6, 2008). "The Malaysian ant teaches us all how to go out with a bang". Daily Star. Dhaka.
  27. Ridley, Mark (1995). Animal Behaviour (Second ed.). Blackwell Publishing. p. 3. ISBN 0-86542-390-3. Retrieved 2009-09-26.
  28. Robert S. Anderson; Richard Beatty; Stuart Church (January 2003). Insects and Spiders of the World. Vol. 9. p. 543. ISBN 978-0-7614-7334-3.
  29. Bonasio, R.; et al. (November 12, 2011). "Genome data from the Florida carpenter ant (Camponotus floridanus)". GigaScience. doi:10.5524/100018.
  30. Davis, Ryan; Young, Deborah; Johnson, Kelsie; Armenta, Roberta; Berry, Genevieve. "Common Structural and Health-Related Pests of Utah" (PDF). USU School Integrated Pest Management. Utah State University Extension and Colorado State University Extension. Retrieved September 7, 2020.
  31. "Maxforce Carpenter Ant Bait Gel Directions for Use". Archived from the original on 14 August 2018. Retrieved 14 Aug 2018.
  32. Capinera 2008, p. 1342.
  33. Resh & Cardé 2009, p. 381.
  34. Gullan & Cranston 2010, p. 13.
  35. Srivastava, S.K.; Babu, Naresh; Pandey, Hema (2009). "Traditional insect bioprospecting-As human food and medicine" (PDF). Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge. 8 (4): 485–494. Retrieved 16 April 2015.
  36. Bequaert J (1921). "Insects as food: How they have augmented the food supply of mankind in early and recent times". Natural History Journal. 21: 191–200.
  37. Morris 2006, p. 52.

Cited texts

  • Capinera, John L. (2008). Encyclopedia of Entomology. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-1-4020-6242-1.
  • Morris, Brian (2006). Insects and Human Life. Berg. ISBN 978-1-84520-949-0.
  • Resh, Vincent H.; Cardé, Ring T. (2009). Encyclopedia of Insects. Academic Press. ISBN 9780080920900.
  • Gullan, P.J.; Cranston, P.S. (2010). The Insects: An Outline of Entomology (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-1-4443-1767-1.

Further reading

  • Mayr, Gustav (1861): Die europäischen Formiciden. Vienna. PDF—original description of p. 35
  • McArthur, Archie J (2007): A Key to Camponotus Mayr of Australia. In: Snelling, R.R., B.L. Fisher and P.S. Ward (eds). Advances in ant systematics (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): homage to E. O. Wilson – 50 years of contributions. Memoirs of the American Entomological Institute 80. PDF — 91 species, 10 subspecies
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.