Kraken

The kraken (/ˈkrɑːkən/)[7] is a legendary sea monster of enormous size said to appear off the coasts of Norway.

For other uses, see Kraken (disambiguation). For generic sjøuhyre, see sea monster.

Kraken vs. ship
Kraken, an unconfirmed cephalopod.[lower-alpha 1] Engraving by W. H. Lizars, in Hamilton, Robert (1839). Naturalist's Library. Adapted "from Denys Montford" [sic.][3]
A "colossal octopus" that attacked a ship. Drawing by Pierre Denys-Montfort, engraved by Étienne Claude Voysard, 1801[4]
Colorized facsimile[5] – hand-colored woodcut[6] or pen and wash

Kraken, the subject of sailors' superstitions and mythos, was first described in the modern age at the turn of the 18th century, in a travelogue by Francesco Negri in 1700. This description was followed in 1734 by an account from Dano-Norwegian missionary and explorer Hans Egede, who described the kraken in detail and equated it with the hafgufa of medieval lore.

However, the first description of the creature is usually credited to the Norwegian bishop, Pontoppidan (1753). Pontoppidan was the first to describe the kraken as an octopus (polypus) of tremendous size,[lower-alpha 2] and wrote that it had a reputation for pulling down ships. The French malacologist, Denys-Montfort, of the 19th century is also known for his pioneering inquiries into the existence of gigantic octopuses.

The great man-killing octopus entered French fiction when novelist Victor Hugo (1866) introduced the pieuvre octopus of Guernsey lore, which he identified with the kraken of legend. This led to Jules Verne's depiction of the kraken, although Verne did not distinguish between squid and octopus.

The legend of the Kraken may have originated from sightings of giant squid, which may grow to 13–15 meters (40–50 feet) in length.

Linnaeus may have indirectly written about the kraken. Linnaeus wrote about the Microcosmus genus (an animal with various other organisms or growths attached to it, comprising a colony). Subsequent authors have referred to Linnaeus's writing, and the writings of Bartholin's cetus called hafgufa, and Paullini's monstrous marinum as "krakens".[lower-alpha 3]

That said, the claim that Linnaeus used the word "kraken" in the margin of a later edition of Systema Naturae has not been confirmed.

Etymology

The English word "kraken" (in the sense of sea monster) derives from Norwegian kraken or krakjen, which are the definite forms of krake.[7]

According to a Norwegian dictionary, krake, in the sense of "malformed or crooked tree" originates from Old Norse kraki,[8] meaning "pole, stake".[9] And krake in the sense of "sea monster" or "octopus" may share the same etymology.[8] Swedish krake for "sea monster" is also traced to krake meaning "pole".[10]

However, Finnur Jónsson remarked that the krake also signified a grapnel (dregg) or anchor, which readily conjured up the image of a cephalopod. He also explained the synonym of krake, namely horv was an alternate form of harv 'harrow' and conjectured that this name was suggested by the inkfish's action of seeming to plow the sea.[11]

Shetlandic krekin for "whale", a taboo word, is listed as etymologically related.[10][12]

Some of the synonyms of krake given by Erik Pontoppidan were, in Danish:[lower-alpha 4] søe-krake, kraxe, horv,[13] krabbe, søe-horv, anker-trold.[14][lower-alpha 5][lower-alpha 6]

The form krabbe also suggests an etymological root cognate with the German verb krabben 'to crawl".[24]

First descriptions
Two monsters, the ferocious toothed "swine whale", and the horned, flashy-eyed "bearded whale" on Olaus's map, given specific names by Gesner.[25][26] The "bearded" is possibly a kraken.[27][lower-alpha 7] Olaus Magnus, Carta marina (1539)

The first description of the krake as "sciu-crak" was given by Italian writer Negri in Viaggio settentrionale (Padua, 1700), a travelogue about Scandinavia.[29][30] The book describes the sciu-crak as a massive "fish" which was many-horned or many-armed. The author also distinguished this from a sea-serpent.[31]

The kraken was described as a many-headed and clawed creature by Egede (1741)[1729], who stated it was equivalent to the Icelanders' hafgufa,[32] but the latter is commonly treated as a fabulous whale.[33] Erik Pontoppidan (1753) who popularized the kraken to the world noted that it was multiple-armed according to lore, and conjectured it to be a giant sea-crab, starfish or a polypus (octopus).[34] Still, the bishop is considered to have been instrumental in sparking interest for the kraken in the English-speaking world,[35] as well as becoming regarded as the authority on sea-serpents and krakens.[36]

Although it has been stated that the kraken (Norwegian: krake) was "described for the first time by that name" in the writings of Erik Pontoppidan, bishop of Bergen, in his Det første Forsøg paa Norges naturlige Historie "The First Attempt at [a] Natural History of Norway" (1752–53),[37] a German source qualified Pontoppidan to be the first source on kraken available to be read in the German language.[38] A description of the kraken had been anticipated by Hans Egede.[39]

Denys-Montfort (1801) published on two giants, the "colossal octopus" with the enduring image of it attacking a ship, and the "kraken octopod", deemed to be the largest organism in zoology. Denys-Montfort matched his "colossal" with Pliny's tale of the giant polypus that attacked ships-wrecked people, while making correspondence between his kraken and Pliny's monster called the arbor marina.[lower-alpha 8] Finnur Jónsson (1920) also favored identifying the kraken as an inkfish (squid/octopus) on etymological grounds.

Egede

The krake (German, English: kraken) was described by Hans Egede in his Det gamle Grønlands nye perlustration (1729; Ger. t. 1730; tr. Description of Greenland , 1745),[40] drawing from the "fables" of his native region, the Nordlandene len of Norway, then under Danish rule.[42][43]

According to his Norwegian informants, the kraken's body measured many miles in length, and when it surfaced it seemed to cover the whole sea, and "having many heads and a number of claws". With its claws it captured its prey, which included ships, men, fish, and animals, carrying its victims back into the depths.[43]

Egede conjectured that the krake was equitable to the monster that the Icelanders call hafgufa, but as he has not obtained anything related to him through an informant, he had difficuty describing the latter.[32][lower-alpha 9]

According to the lore of Norwegian fishermen, they can mount upon the fish-attracting kraken as if it were a sand-bank (Fiske-Grund 'fishing shoal'), but if they ever had the misfortune to capture the kraken, getting it entangled on their hooks, the only way to avoid destruction was to pronounce its name to make it go back to its depths.[45][46] Egede also wrote that the krake fell under the general category of "sea spectre" (Danish: søe-trold og [søe]-spøgelse),[48] adding that "the Draw" (Danish: Drauen, definite form) was another being within that sea spectre classification.[19][46][lower-alpha 10]

Hafgufa

Egede also made the aforementioned identification of krake as being the same as the hafgufa of the Icelanders,[15][32] though he seemed to have obtained the information indirectly from medieval Norwegian work, the Speculum Regale (or King's Mirror, c. 1250).[lower-alpha 11][51][52][39][15]

Later David Crantz in Historie von Grönland (History of Greenland, 1765) also reported kraken and the hafgufa to be synonymous.[53][54]

An English translator of the King's Mirror in 1917 opted to translate hafgufa as kraken.[55]

And the hafgufa [lower-alpha 12]from the 13th-century Old Norse work[56][57][lower-alpha 13] continues to be identified with the kraken in some scholarly writings,[59][15] and if this equivalence were allowed, the kraken-hafgufa's range would extend, at least legendarily, to waters approaching Helluland (Baffin Island, Canada), as described in Örvar-Odds saga.[60][lower-alpha 14]

Contrary opinion

The description of the hafgufa in the King's Mirror suggests a garbled eyewitness account of what was actually a whale, at least to some opinion.[61] Halldór Hermannsson also reads the work as describing the hafgufa as a type of whale.[33]

Finnur Jónsson (1920) having arrived at the opinion that the kraken probably represented an inkfish (squid/octopus), as discussed earlier, expressed his skepticism towards the standing notion that the kraken originated from the hafgufa.[11]

Pontoppidan

Erik Pontoppidan's Det første Forsøg paa Norges naturlige Historie (1752, actually volume 2, 1753)[62] made several claims regarding kraken, including the notion that the creature was sometimes mistaken for a group of small islands with fish swimming in-between,[63] Norwegian fishermen often took the risk of trying to fish over kraken, since the catch was so plentiful[64] (hence the saying "You must have fished on Kraken"[65]).

However, there was also the danger to seamen of being engulfed by the whirlpool when it submerged,[66][24] and this whirlpool was compared to Norway's famed Moskstraumen often known as "the Maelstrom".[67][68]

Pontoppidan also described the destructive potential of the giant beast: "it is said that if [the creature's arms] were to lay hold of the largest man-of-war, they would pull it down to the bottom".[69][66][24][70]

Kraken purportedly exclusively fed for several months, then spent the following few months emptying its excrement, and the thickened clouded water attracted fish.[71] Later Henry Lee commented that the supposed excreta may have been the discharge of ink by a cephalopod.[72]

Taxonomic identifications

Pontoppidan wrote of a possible specimen of the krake, "perhaps a young and careless one", which washed ashore and died at Alstahaug in 1680.[70][68][17] He observed that it had long "arms", and guessed that it must have been crawling like a snail/slug with the use of these "arms", but got lodged in the landscape during the process.[73][74] 20th century malacologist Paul Bartsch conjectured this to have been a giant squid,[75] as did literary scholar Finnur Jónsson.[76]

However, what Pontoppidan actually stated regarding what creatures he regarded as candidates for the kraken is quite complicated.

Pontoppidan did tentatively identify the kraken to be a sort of giant crab, stating that the alias krabben best describes its characteristics.[16][77][68][lower-alpha 15]

Medusa's head, or kraken's young according to fishermen's lore
Gorgonocephalus caputmedusae (old name Astrophyton Linckii[80]), possibly Linnaeus's "Medusa's head"? according to Lyman;[81] native to the North Sea.[82]
Gorgonocephalus eucnemis.[83] "Shetland Argus", according to Bell; possibly Linnaeus's caput medusa[e] also;[84][85] this a more far-ranging species.[85]

However, further down in his writing, compares the creature to some creature(s) from Pliny, Book IX, Ch. 4: the sea-monster called arbor, with tree-branch like multiple arms,[lower-alpha 16] complicated by the fact that Pontoppidan adds another of Pliny's creature called rota with eight arms, and conflates them into one organism.[86][87] Pontoppidan is suggesting this is an ancient example of kraken, as a modern commentator analyzes.[88]

Pontoppidan then declared the kraken to be a type of polypus (=octopus)[91] or "starfish", particularly the kind Gesner called Stella Arborescens, later identifiable as one of the northerly ophiurids[92] or possibly more specifically as one of the Gorgonocephalids or even the genus Gorgonocephalus (though no longer regarded as family/genus under order Ophiurida, but under Phrynophiurida in current taxonomy).[96][99]

This ancient arbor (admixed rota and thus made eight-armed) seems an octopus at first blush[100] but with additional data, the ophiurid starfish now appears bishop's preferential choice.[101]

The ophiurid starfish seems further fortified when he notes that "starfish" called "Medusa's heads" (caput medusæ; pl. capita medusæ) are considered to be "the young of the great sea-krake" by local lore. Pontoppidan ventured the 'young krakens' may rather be the eggs (ova) of the starfish.[102] Pontopiddan was satisfied that "Medusa's heads" was the same as the foregoing starfish (Stella arborensis of old),[103] but "Medusa's heads" were something found ashore aplenty across Norway according to von Bergen, who thought it absurd these could be young "Kraken" since that would mean the seas would be full of (the adults).[104][105] The "Medusa's heads" appear to be a Gorgonocephalid, with Gorgonocephalus spp. being tentatively suggested.[106][lower-alpha 17] [110][112]

In the end though, Pontoppidan again appears ambivalent, stating "Polype, or Star-fish [belongs to] the whole genus of Kors-Trold ['cross troll'], .. some that are much larger, .. even the very largest.. of the ocean", and concluding that "this Krake must be of the Polypus kind".[113] By "this Krake" here, he apparently meant in particular the giant polypus octopus of Carteia from Pliny, Book IX, Ch. 30 (though he only used the general nickname "ozaena" 'stinkard' for the octopus kind).[87][114][lower-alpha 18]

Denys-Montfort

In 1802, the French malacologist Pierre Denys-Montfort recognized the existence of two "species" of giant octopuses in Histoire Naturelle Générale et Particulière des Mollusques, an encyclopedic description of mollusks.[4]

The "colossal giant" was supposedly the same as Pliny's "monstrous polypus",[115][116] which was a man-killer which ripped apart (Latin: distrahit) shipwrecked people and divers.[119][120] Montfort accompanied his publication with an engraving representing the giant octopus poised to destroy a three-masted ship.[4][121]

Whereas the "kraken octopus", was the most gigantic animal on the planet in the writer's estimation, dwarfing Pliny's "colossal octopus"/"monstrous polypus",[122][123] and identified here as the aforementioned Pliny's monster, called the arbor marinus.[124]

Montfort also listed additional wondrous fauna as identifiable with the kraken.[125] [126] There was Paullini's monstrum marinum glossed as a sea crab (German: Seekrabbe),[127] which a later biologist has suggested to be one of the Hyas spp.[128] It was also described as resembling Gesner's Cancer heracleoticus crab alleged to appear off the Finnish coast.[127][123] von Bergen's "bellua marina omnium vastissima" (meaning 'vastest-of-all sea-beast'), namely the trolwal ('ogre whale', 'troll whale') of Northern Europe, and the Teufelwal ('devil whale') of the Germans follow in the list.[129][126]

Angola octopus, pictured in St. Malo

It is in his chapter on the "colossal octopus" that Montfort provides the contemporary eyewitness example of a group of sailors who encounter the giant off the coast of Angola, who afterwards deposited a pictorial commemoration of the event as a votive offering at St. Thomas's chapel in Saint-Malo, France.[130] Based on that picture, Montfort drew a "colossal octopus" attacking a ship, and included the engraving in his book.[5][6] However, an English author recapitulating Montfort's account of it attaches an illustration of it, which was captioned: "The Kraken supposed a sepia or cuttlefish", while attributing Montfort.[131]

Hamilton's book was not alone in recontextualizing Montfort's ship-assaulting colossal octopus as a kraken, for instance, the piece on the "kraken" by American zoologist Packard.[132]

The Frenchman Montfort used the obsolete scientific name Sepia octopodia but called it a pouple,[133] which means "octopus" to this day; meanwhile the English-speaking naturalists had developed the convention of calling the octopus "eight-armed cuttle-fish", as did Packard[2] and Hamilton,[3] even though modern-day speakers are probably unfamiliar with that name.

Warship Ville de Paris

Having accepting as fact that a colossal octopus was capable of dragging a ship down, Montfort made a more daring hypothesis. He attempted to blame colossal octopuses for the loss of ten warships under British control in 1782, including six captured French men-of-war. The disaster began with the distress signal fired by the captured ship of the line Ville de Paris which was then swallowed up by parting waves, and the other ships coming to aid shared the same fate. He proposed, by process of elimination, that such an event could only be accounted for as the work of many octopuses.[134][135][136] But it has been pointed out the sinkings have simply been explained by the presence of a storm,[121] and Montfort's involving octopuses as complicit has been characterized as "reckless falsity".[136]

The Niagara sighting. 200 foot creature allegedly seen afloat in 1813, depicted as octopus by a naturalist

It has also been noted that Montfort once quipped to a friend, DeFrance: "If my entangled ship is accepted, I will make my 'colossal poulpe' overthrow a whole fleet".[137][138][2]

Niagara

The ship Niagara on course from Lisbon to New York in 1813 logged a sighting of a marine animal spotted afloat at sea. It was claimed to be 200 feet in length, covered in shells, and had many birds alighted upon it.

Samuel Latham Mitchill reported this, and referencing Montfort's kraken, reproduced an illustration of it as an octopus.[139]

Linnaeus's microcosmus
Sea-grapes, or cephalopod eggs

The famous Swedish 18th century naturalist Carl Linnaeus in his Systema Naturae (1735) described a fabulous genus Microcosmus a "body covered with various heterogeneous [other bits]" (Latin: Corpus variis heterogeneis tectum).[128][140][141][lower-alpha 19]

Linnaeus cited four sources under Microcosmus, namely:[lower-alpha 20][128][143] Thomas Bartholin's cetus (≈whale) type hafgufa;[145] Paullin's monstrum marinum aforementioned;[127] and Francesco Redi's giant tunicate (Ascidia[128]) in Italian and Latin.[146][147]

According to the Swedish zoologist Lovén, the common name kraken was added to the 6th edition of Systema Naturae (1748),[128] which was a Latin version augmented with Swedish names[148] (in blackletter), but such Swedish text is wanting on this particular entry, e.g. in the copy held by NCSU.[142] It is true that the 7th edition of 1748, which adds German vernacular names,[148] identifies the Microcosmus as "sea-grape" (German: Meertrauben), referring to a cluster of cephalopod eggs.[149][150][lower-alpha 21][lower-alpha 22]

Also, the Frenchman Louis Figuier in 1860 misstated that Linnaeus included in his classification a cephalopod called "Sepia microcosmus"[lower-alpha 23] in his first edition of Systema Naturae (1735).[154] Figuier's mistake has been pointed out, and Linnaeus never represented the kraken as such a cephalopod.[155] Nevertheless, the error has been perpetuated by even modern-day writers.[157]

Linnaeus in English

Thomas Pennant, an Englishman, had written of Sepia octopodia as "eight-armed cuttlefish" (we call it octopus today), and documented reported cases in the Indian isles where specimen grow to 2 fathoms (3.7 m) wide, "and each arms 9 fathoms (16 m) long".[2][1] This was added as a species Sepia octopusa [sic.] by William Turton in his English version of Linnaeus's System of Nature, together with the account of the 9-fathom long armed octopuses.[2][158]

The trail stemming from Linnaeus, eventually leading to such pieces on the kraken written in English by the naturalist James Wilson for the Blackwood's Edinburgh Magazine in 1818 sparked an awareness of the kraken among 19th century English, hence Tennyson's poem, "The Kraken".[59]

Iconography
"Kraken of the imagination". John Gibson, 1887.[159]

As to the iconography, Denys-Montfort's engraving of the "colossal octopus" is often shown, though this differs from the kraken according to the French malacologist,[5] and commentators are found characterizing the ship attack representing the "kraken octopod".[2][160]

And after Denys-Monfort's illustration, various publishers produced similar illustrations depicting the kraken attacking a ship.[3][159]

Whereas the kraken was described by Egede as having "many Heads and a Number of Claws", the creature is also depicted to have spikes or horns, at least in illustrations of creatures which commentators have conjectured to be krakens. The "bearded whale" shown on an early map (pictured above) is conjectured to be a kraken perhaps (cf. §Olaus Magnus below). Also, there was an alleged two-headed and horned monster that beached ashore in Dingle, Co. Kerry, Ireland, thought to be a giant cephalopod, of which there was a picture/painting made by the discoverer.[161] He made a travelling show of his work on canvas, as introduced in a book on the kraken.[162]

Olaus Magnus
Polypi depicted as lobster-like
Monster "M". Carta marina (1539), detail.
Giant lobster attacking ship. Lee, Henry (1884), p. 58, after Olaus Magnus (1555), Historia de gentibus septentrionalibus.
"Kraken is represented as a Crayfish or Lobster"[163]
Giant fish encountered by St. Brendan. "Insula Fortunata" marked near it.[164]

While Swedish writer Olaus Magnus did not use the term kraken, various sea-monsters were illustrated on his famous map, the Carta marina (1539). Modern writers have since tried to interpret various sea creatures illustrated as a portrayal of the kraken.

Olaus gives description of a whale with two elongated teeth ("like a boar's or elephant's tusk") to protect its huge eyes, which "sprouts horns", and although these are as hard as horn, they can be made supple also.[165][28] But the tusked form was named "swine-whale" (German: Schweinwal), and the horned form "bearded whale" (German: Bart-wal) by Swiss naturalist Gesner, who observed it possessed a "starry beard" around the upper and lower jaws.[166][26] At least one writer has suggested this might represent the kraken of Norwegian lore.[27]

Another work commented less discerningly that Olaus's map is "replete with imagery of krakens and other monsters".[15]

Ashton's Curious Creatures (1890) drew significantly from Olaus's work[167] and even quoted the Swede's description of the horned whale.[168] But he identified the kraken as a cephalopod and devoted much space on Pliny's and Olaus's descriptions of the giant "polypus",[169] noting that Olaus had represented the kraken-polypus as a crayfish or lobster in his illustrations, [170] and reproducing the images from both Olaus's book[171][165][28] and his map.[172][173] In Olaus book, the giant lobster illustration is uncaptioned, but appears right above the words "De Polypis (on the octopus)", which is the chapter heading.[165] Hery Lee was also of the opinion that the multi-legged lobster was a misrepresentation of a reported cephalopod attack on a ship.[174]

The legend in Olaus's map fails to clarify on the lobster-like monster "M",[lower-alpha 24] depicted off the island of Iona.[lower-alpha 25][176] However, the associated writing called the Auslegung adds that this section of the map extends from Ireland to the "Insula Fortunata".[177] This "Fortunate Island" was a destination on St. Brendan's Voyage, one of whose adventures was the landing of the crew on an island-sized monstrous, as depicted in a 17th century engraving (cf. figure right);[179] and this monstrous fish, according to Bartholin was the aforementioned hafgufa,[145] which has already been discussed above as one of the creatures of lore equated with kraken.

Giant squid

The piece of squid recovered by the French ship Alecton in 1861, discussed by Henry Lee in his chapter on the "Kraken",[180] would later be identified as a giant squid, Architeuthis by A. E. Verrill.[181]

After a specimen of the giant squid, Architeuthis, was discovered by Rev. Moses Harvey and published in science by Professor A. E. Verrill, commentators have remarked on this cephalopod as possibly explaining the legendary kraken.[182][183][184]

Paleo-cephalopod

An ancient, giant cephalopod resembling the legendary kraken has been proposed as responsible for the deaths of ichthyosaurs during the Triassic Period.[185] This theory has met with severe criticism.[186]

Literary influences
An illustration from the original 1870 edition of Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea by Jules Verne

The French novelist Victor Hugo's Les Travailleurs de la mer (1866, "Toilers of the Sea") discusses the man-eating octopus, the kraken of legend, called pieuvre by the locals of the Channel Islands (in the Guernsey dialect, etc.).[187][188][lower-alpha 26] Hugo's octopus later influenced Jules Verne's depiction of the kraken in Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea,[190] though Verne also drew on the real-life encounter the French ship Alecton had with what was probably a giant squid.[191] It has been noted that Verne indiscriminately interchanged kraken with calmar (squid) and poulpe (octopus).[192]

In the English-speaking world, examples in fine literature are Alfred Tennyson's 1830 irregular sonnet The Kraken,[193] references in Herman Melville's 1851 novel Moby-Dick (Chapter 59 "Squid"),[194]

Although fictional and the subject of myth, the legend of the Kraken continues to the present day, with numerous references in film, literature, television, and other popular culture topics.[195]

Examples include: John Wyndham's novel The Kraken Wakes (1953), the Kraken of Marvel Comics, the 1981 film Clash of the Titans and its 2010 remake of the same name, and the Seattle Kraken professional ice hockey team. Krakens also appear in video games such as Sea of Thieves, God of War II and Return of the Obra Dinn. The kraken was also featured in two of the Pirates of the Caribbean movies, primarily in the 2006 film, Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest, as the pet of the fearsome Davy Jones, the main antagonist of the film. The kraken also makes an appearance in the film's sequel, At World's End.

See also

Explanatory notes
  1. Caption: "The Kraken, supposed a sepia or cuttlefish from Denys Montford" [sic.]". Sepia was formerly the genus that octopuses, squid, and cuttlefish (cephalopods) were all assigned to. Thus "eight-armed cuttle-fish" became the standardized name for "octopus".[1][2]
  2. He vacillated between polypus and "star fish" however.
  3. Denys-Montfort's footnote identified his kraken with Paullini's monstrum marinum also, leading Samuel Latham Mitchill to comment that "Linnaeus considered the Kraken as a real existence", publishing it under Microcosmus.
  4. Pontoppidan of course wrote in Danish, the standard literary language for Norwegians at the time, though words like krake were presumably taken down from the mouths of the native Norwegian populace.
  5. With definite article suffixed forms such as Kraxen or Krabben[15] appearing in the English translation.[16]
  6. Pontopoppidan's "Soe-draulen, Soe-trolden, Sea-mischief" has been frequently requoted,[17][18] but these terms can be deferred to Egede's explanation (discussed further, below) that employs søe-trold as a general classification, under which krake and the søe-drau fall.[19] The word drau as a variant of draug was recognized by Pontoppidan as meaning 'spøgelse ghost, spectre',[20] and the latter form draug is defined more specifically as a being associated with sea or water in modern Norwegian dictionaries.[21] The "Sea-mischief" appears in the English translation[22] but is absent in the original.[23]
  7. The two are changing forms of just one beast, which has both tusks and protrusible horns to protect its large eyes, according to Olaus's book.[28]
  8. And other fabulous-seeming creatures, such as monstrum marinum, bellua marina omnium vastissima, etc.
  9. Machan quoted Egede's text proper regarding some sort of "Bæst"[15] or "forfærdelige Hav-Dyr [terrible sea-animal]" witnessed in the Colonies (Greenland),[19] but ignored the footnote which tells much on the krake. Ruickbie quoted Egede's footnote, but decided to place it under his entry for "Hafgufa".[44]
  10. Reference to the sea spectre ("phantom") was added in the English margin header: "A Norway Tale of Kraken, a pretended phantom",[49] but that reference is wanting in the Danish original. It was already noted that the original wording localizes the legend specifically to Nordlandene len, not Norway altogether.
  11. Speculum Regale Islandicum after Thormodus Torfæus, as elocuted by Egede. The Speculum contains a detailed digression about whales and seals in the seas around Iceland and Greenland,[50] where one finds description of the hafgufa.
  12. Described as the largest of the sea monsters, inhabiting the Greenland Sea
  13. Bushnell speaks of Icelandic literature (in the 13th century) also, but strictly speaking, Örvar-Odds saga contains the mention of hafgufa and lyngbakr[58] only in the later recension, dated to the late 14th century.
  14. Mouritsen & Styrbæk (2018) (book on inkfish) distinguishes the whale lyngbakr with the monster hafgufa.
  15. Cf. kraken aka "the crab-fish" (Swedish: Krabbfisken) described by Swedish magnate Jacob Wallenberg in Min son på galejan ("My son on the galley", 1781):
    Kraken, also called the crab-fish, which is not that huge, for heads and tails counted, he is reckoned not to overtake the length of our Öland off Kalmar [i.e., 85 mi or 137 kilometres] ... He stays at the sea floor, constantly surrounded by innumerable small fishes, who serve as his food and are fed by him in return: for his meal, (if I remember correctly what E. Pontoppidan writes,) lasts no longer than three months, and another three are then needed to digest it. His excrements nurture in the following an army of lesser fish, and for this reason, fishermen plumb after his resting place ... Gradually, Kraken ascends to the surface, and when he is at ten to twelve fathoms [18 to 22 m; 60 to 72 ft] below, the boats had better move out of his vicinity, as he will shortly thereafter burst up, like a floating island, gushing out currnts like at Trollhättan [Trollhätteströmmar], his dreadful nostrils and making an ever-expanding ring of whirlpool, reaching many miles around. Could one doubt that this is the Leviathan of Job?[78][79]
  16. This is called arbor marinus by Denys-Montfort, and equated with his kraken octopus, as discussed below.
  17. Actually there is even the species "Gorgon's head" Astrocladus euryale, whose old name was Asterias euryale,[107] which Blumenbach claimed was one of the species that Scandinavian naturalists considered kraken's children.[108] But A. euryale inhabits South African waters. Blumenbach also named Euryale verrucosum, old name of Astrocladus exiguus[109] which occur in the Pacific.
  18. The ozaena nickname as literally 'stinkard' for the octopus on account of its reek is given in the side-by-sidy translation by Gerhardt. The polypus of Carteia tract, is thus given, but the Latin quoted by Pontoppidan ""Namque et afflatu terribli canes agebat.." is blanked Gerhardt and only given in modern English, "were pitted against something uncanny, for by its awful breath it tormented the dogs, which it now scourged with the ends of its tentacles".. because it represents an interpolation by Pliny.
  19. Lovén gave the text as tegmen ex heterogeneis compilatis,[128] but this reading occurs in the Latin-Swedish 6th edition of 1748.[142] Whereas the 2nd edition has "testa" instead of "tegmen".[143]
  20. Lóven indicates that these sources appeared in print in the second edition of SN, but as a piece of marginalia, he notes these sources were also given in Linnaeus's 1733 lectures.[128] The lecture was preserved in the Notes taken by Mennander, held by the Royal Library, Stockholm.[144]
  21. "Meer=Trauben" already appeared in the 1740 Latin-German edition.[141] The 9th edition of 1956, which is said to be the same as the 6th edition,[148] also leaves a blanc instead of adding the French vernacular name.[151]
  22. An illustration of sea-grapes (French: raisins de mer) appears on Moquin-Tandon (1865), p. 309.
  23. As noted previously, Sepia genus represents cuttlefish in modern taxonomy, Linnaeus's genus Sepia was essentially "cephalopods", and his Sepia octopodia was the common octopus.[152][153]
  24. However, elsewhere on the map, the giant lobster is called a lobster (Latin: gambarus<κάμμαρος) in the legend; this is the one shown struggling with a one-horned beast.[175]
  25. Iona is of course associated with the Irish saints, Columcille and St. Brendan.
  26. Hugo also produced an ink and wash sketch of the octopus.[189]

References

Citations
  1. Pennant, Thomas (1777). "Sepia". British ZoologyIV: Crustacea. Mollusca. Testacea. Benjamin White. pp. 44–45.
  2. Packard, A. S. (March 1872). "Kraken". The Connecticut School Journal. 2 (3): 78–79. JSTOR 44648937.
  3. Hamilton (1839). Plate XXX, p. 326a.
  4. Denys-Montfort (1801), p. 256, Pl. XXVI.
  5. Lee (1875), pp. 100–103.
  6. Nigg (2014), p. 147: "The hand-colored woodcut is a reproduction of art in the Church of St. Malo in France".
  7. "kraken". Oxford English Dictionary. Vol. V (1 ed.). Oxford University Press. 1933. p. 754. Norw. kraken, krakjen, the -n, being the suffixed definite article = A New English Dictionary on Historical Principles (1901), V: 754
  8. "kraken". Bokmålsordboka | Nynorskordboka.
  9. Cleasby & Vigfusson (1874), An Icelandic-English Dictionary, s.v. "kraki" '[Dan. krage], a pole, stake'
  10. "krake". Svenska Akademiens ordbok (in Swedish).
  11. Finnur Jónsson (1920), pp. 113–114.
  12. Jakobsen, Jakob (1921), "krekin, krechin", Etymologisk ordbog over det norrøne sprog på Shetland, Prior, p. 431; Cited in Collingwood, W. G. (1910). Review, Antiquary 46: 157
  13. Pontoppidan (1753a), p. xvi(?)
  14. Pontoppidan (1753a), p. 340.
  15. Machan, Tim William (2020). "Ch. 5. Narrative, Memory, Meaning /§Kraken". Northern memories and the English Middle Ages. David Matthews, Anke Bernau, James Paz. Manchester University Press. ISBN 9781526145376.
  16. Pontoppidan (1755), p. 210.
  17. Metropolitana (1845), p. 256.
  18. W[ilson] (1818), p. 647.
  19. Egede (1741), p. 49.
  20. Knudsen, Knud (1862). Er Norsk det samme som Dansk?. Christiania: Steenske Bogtrykkeri. p. 41).
  21. "draug". Bokmålsordboka | Nynorskordboka.
  22. Pontoppidan (1755), p. 214.
  23. Pontoppidan (1753a), pp. 346–347: Danish: .. krake, hvilken nongle Søe-fokl ogsaa kalde Søe-Draulen, det er Søe-Trolden
  24. [Anonymous] (1849). (Review) New Books: An Essay on the credibility of the Kraken. The Nautical Magazine 18(5): 272–276.
  25. Olaus Magnus (1887) [1539], Brenner, Oscar (ed.), "Die ächte Karte des Olaus Magnus vom Jahre 1539 nach dem Exemplar de Münchener Staatsbibliothek", Forhandlinger i Videnskabs-selskabet i Christiania, Trykt hos Brøgger & Christie, p. 7, monstra duo marina maxima vnum dentibus truculentum, alterum cornibus et visu flammeo horrendum / Cuius oculi circumferentia XVI vel XX pedum mensuram continet
  26. Gesner, Conrad (1670). Fisch-Buch. Gesnerus redivivus auctus & emendatus, oder: Allgemeines Thier-Buch 4. Frankfurt-am-Main: Wilhelm Serlin. pp. 124–125.
  27. Nigg, Joseph (2014). "The Kraken". Sea Monsters: A Voyage around the World's Most Beguiling Map. David Matthews, Anke Bernau, James Paz. University of Chicago Press. pp. 145–146. ISBN 9780226925189.
  28. Olaus Magnus (1998). Foote, Peter (ed.). Historia de Gentibus Septentrionalibus: Romæ 1555 [Description of the Northern Peoples : Rome 1555]. Fisher, Peter;, Higgens, Humphrey (trr.). Hakluyt Society. p. 1092. ISBN 9780904180435.
  29. Eberhart, George M. (2002). "Kraken". Mysterious Creatures: A Guide to Cryptozoology. ABC-CLIO. p. 282ff. ISBN 1-57607-283-5.
  30. Beck, Thor Jensen (1934), Northern Antiquities in French Learning and Literature (1755-1855): A Study in Preromantic Ideas, vol. 2, Columbia university, p. 199, Before Pontoppidan , the same " Krake ” had been taken very seriously by the Italian traveler , Francesco Negri
  31. Negri, Francesco (1701) [1700], Viaggio settentrionale (in Italian), Forli, pp. 184–185, Sciu-crak è chiamato un pesce di smisurata grandezza, di figura piana , rotonda , con molte corna o braccia alle sue estremità
  32. Egede (1741). p. 48: "Det 3die Monstrum, kaldet Havgufa som det allerforunderligte, veed Autor ikke ret at beskrive" p. 49: " af dennem kaldes Kraken, og er uden Tvil den self jamm; som Islænderne kalde Havgufa"; Egede (1745). p. 86: "The third monster, named Hafgufa.. the Author does not well know ow to describe.. he never had any relation of it." p. 87: "Kracken.. no doubt the same that the Islanders call Hafgufa"
  33. Halldór Hermannsson (1938), p. 11: Speculum regiae of the 13th century describes a monstrous whale which it calls hafgufa... The whale as an island was, of course, known from the Saga of St. Brandan, but there it was called Jaskonius".
  34. Pontoppidan (1753a) (Danish); Pontoppidan (1755) (English); vid. infra.
  35. Bushnell (2019), p. 56: "Nineteenth-century English interest in the Kraken stems from Linnaeus's discussion of the creature in the first edition of Systema Naturae (1735) and most famously from Natural History of Norway (1752-3) by the Bishop.. Pontoppidan (translated into English soon after)".
  36. Oudemans (1892), p. 414.
  37. Anderson, Rasmus B. (1896). Kra'ken. Johnson's Universal Cyclopædia. Vol. 5 (new ed.). D. Appletons. p. 26.
  38. Müller (1802), p. 594: "Der norwegische Bischoff Pontoppidan ist der erster, welcher uns einer umständliche und deutsche Nachricht von diesem Seethier gegeben hat".
  39. Kongelige nordiske oldskrift-selskab, ed. (1845). Grönlands historiske Mindesmaerker. Vol. 3. Brünnich. p. 371, note 52).
  40. Pilling, James Constantine (1885). Proof-sheets of a Bibliography of the Languages of the North American Indians. Smithsonian Institution Bureau of Ethnology: Miscellaneous publications 2. U.S. Government Printing Office. pp. 226–227.
  41. Egede (1741), p. 49 (footnote).
  42. The marginal header in the original is "Fabel om Kraken i Nordlandene"[41] which refers specifically to the len of Nordland under Danish rule; this is not just modern Norway's Nordland county, but includes the counties that lies farther north. Egede was born in Harstad, in Nordland (len) during his life, but the town is now part of Troms og Finnmark, Norway.
  43. Egede (1741), pp. 48–49 (footnote); Egede (1745), pp. 86–87 (footnote) (English); Egede (1763), pp. 111–113(footnote) (German)
  44. Ruickbie, Leo (2016). "Hafgufa". The Impossible Zoo: An encyclopedia of fabulous beasts and mythical monsters. Little, Brown Book Group. ISBN 9781472136459.
  45. Nyrop, Kristoffer (1887), "Navnets mag: en folkepsykologisk studie", Opuscula Philologica: Mindre Afhandlinger, Copenhagen: Filologisk-historiske Samfund: 182
  46. Egede (1745), p. 88 (footnote).
  47. Kvam, Lorentz Normann (1936), "krekin, krechin", Trollene grynter i haugen (in Norwegian), Nasjonalforlaget, p. 131, Den sier at med ekte troll forståes : a ) jutuler og riser , b ) gjengangere og spøkelser , - c ) nisser og dverger , d ) bergtroll
  48. The Norwegian trold (troll) can signify not just a giant, but spøkelser as well.[47]
  49. Egede (1745), p. 87 (footnote).
  50. Guðbrandur Vigfússon, ed. (1878). Sturlunga Saga: Including the Islendinga Saga. Vol. 1. Clarenden Press. p. 139.
  51. Egede (1741), p. 47.
  52. Egede (1741), p. 85.
  53. Crantz, David (1820). The History of Greenland: Including an Account of the Mission Carried on by the United Brethren in that Country. From the German of David Crantz. Vol. 1. p. 122.; Cf. Note X, pp. 323–338
  54. W[ilson] (1818), p. 649.
  55. "XXII. The Marvels of the Icelandic Seas: whales; the kraken", The King's Mirror: (Speculum Regalae - Konungs Skuggsjá), Library of Scandinavian literature 15, translated by Larson, Laurence Marcellus, Twayne Publishers, 1917, p. 125, ISBN 9780890670088
  56. Keyser, Rudolf; Munch, Peter Andreas; Unger, Carl Richard, eds. (1848), "Chapter 12", Speculum Regale. Konungs-Skuggsjá, Oslo: Carl C. Werner & Co., p. 32
  57. Somerville, Angus A.; McDonald, R. Andrew, eds. (2020) [2019], "Wonders of the Iceland sea", The Viking Age: A Reader, translated by Somerville, Angus A. (3 ed.), University of Toronto Press, p. 308, ISBN 9781487570477
  58. Halldór Hermannsson (1938); Halldór Hermannsson (1924), "Jón Guðmundsson and his natural history of Iceland", Islandica, 15: 36, endnote to p. 8
  59. Bushnell (2019), p. 56.
  60. Mouritsen, Ole G.; Styrbæk, Klavs (2018). Blæksprutterne kommer. Spis dem!. Gyldendal A/S. ISBN 9788702259537.
  61. Kongelige nordiske oldskrift-selskab (1845), p. 372.
  62. Pontoppidan (1753a); Pontoppidan (1753b) (German); Pontoppidan (1755) (English)
  63. Hamilton (1839), pp. 329–330.
  64. Metropolitana (1845), pp. 255–256.
  65. Bringsværd, T.A. (1970). The Kraken: A slimy giant at the bottom of the sea. In: Phantoms and Fairies: From Norwegian Folklore. Johan Grundt Tanum Forlag, Oslo. pp. 67–71.
  66. Hamilton (1839), pp. 328–329.
  67. Pontoppidan (1753b), p. 343: "Male-Strømmen ved Moskøe"; tr. Pontoppidan (1755), p. 212: "the current of the river Male".
  68. "Kraken". Encyclopædia Perthensis; or Universal Dictionary of the Arts, Sciences, Literature, &c.. 12 (2nd ed.). John Brown, Edinburgh. 1816. pp. 541–542.
  69. Pontoppidan (1753b), p. 342: Danish: Orlogs-skib; Pontoppidan (1755), p. 212: "largest man of war".
  70. Sjögren, Bengt (1980). Berömda vidunder. Settern. ISBN 91-7586-023-6 (in Swedish)
  71. Pontoppidan (1755), p. 212.
  72. Lee (1884), p. 332.
  73. Pontoppidan (1753a), pp. 344: "bruge paa Sneglenes Maade, med at strekke dem hid og did"; Pontoppidan (1755), p. 213: "use [long arms, or antennae] like the Snail, in turning about".
  74. Müller (1802), p. 595: "..mit denen es sowohl sich bewegt".
  75. Bartsch, Paul (1917). Pirates of the Deep―Stories of the Squid and Octopu. Smithsonian Report for 1916. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. pp. 364–368.
  76. Finnur Jónsson (1920), p. 114. Norwegian: "kjempebleksprut"; cf. da:Kæmpeblæksprutte.
  77. Machan (2020): "In other words, Pontoppidan imagines the kraken as a kind of giant crab, although he, too, allows that the animal is largely unwitnessed and unknown.
  78. Wallenberg, Jacob (1836), "kapitele (ch. 17): Om en rar fisk", Min son på galejan, eller en ostindisk resa innehållande allehanda bläckhornskram, samlade på skeppet Finland, som afseglade ifrån Götheborg i Dec. 1769, och återkom dersammastädes i Junii 1771 (in Swedish), Stockholm: A. G. Hellsten, p. 163, Det ar kraken, eller den så kallade krabbfisken,.. lär han ej vara längre än vårt Öland utanför Calmar... The last paragraph tjat the remants of the Swedish Pomeranian army may be able to haul a specimen if one could be obtained is curtailed in the Stockholm: A. G. Hellsten, 1836 edition Kap. XVII, pp. 44–45
  79. Cf. Wallenberg, Jacob (1994), My Son on the Galley, Peter J. Graves (tr.), Chester Springs, PA: Dufour Editions, pp. 56–58, ISBN 9781870041232, It is the kraken, the so - called crabfish , which is said to visit these waters occasionally . It is not large since, even including the head and the tail, it is not reckoned to be any longer than our island of Öland off Kalmar..
  80. Stöhr, S.; O’Hara, T.; Thuy, B. (Eds) (2021). "Astrophyton linckii Müller & Troschel, 1842". WoRMS. World Register of Marine Species. Retrieved 28 January 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  81. Lyman (1865), p. 190.
  82. Palomares ML, Pauly D, eds. (2022). "Gorgonocephalus caputmedusae" in SeaLifeBase. January 2022 version.
  83. Stöhr, S.; O’Hara, T.; Thuy, B. (Eds) (2022). "Gorgonocephalus eucnemis (Müller & Troschel, 1842)". WoRMS. World Register of Marine Species. Retrieved 28 January 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  84. Bell, F. Jeffrey (November 1891), "XLIV. Some Notes on British Ophiurids", Annals & Magazine of Natural History, Sixth Series (47): 342–344
  85. Palomares ML, Pauly D, eds. (2022). "Gorgonocephalus eucnemis" in SeaLifeBase. January 2022 version.
  86. Pontoppidan (1753a), pp. 349–350; Pontoppidan (1755), p. 215–216
  87. Heuvelmans (2015), p. 124.
  88. Heuvelmans (2015), p. 124: "..it cannot pass through the Pillars of Hercules; he sees in it an obscure allusion" to the kraken.
  89. Buckland, Francis Trevelyan (1876). Log-book of a Fisherman and Zoologist. Chapman & Hall. p. 209.
  90. Gesner, Conrad (1575). Fischbuch, das ist ein kurtze ... Beschreybung aller Fischen. Zürich: Christoffel Froschower. p. cx and illustr. opposite.
  91. Linnaeus's polypus is 'octopus' and glossed thus by Heuvelmans, but since Pontoppidan resorts to variant spellings such as polype, this could lead to confusion. Gesner's polypus was an octopus as well.[89][90]
  92. Heuvelmans (2015), p. 124 actually only vaguely distinguishes it as "ophiurid" (order Ophiurida).
  93. Lyman (1865), p. 14.
  94. Hurley, Desmond Eugene (1957). Some Amphipoda, Isopoda and Tanaidacea from Cook Strait. Zoology Publications from Victoria University of Wellington, 21. Victoria University of Wellington. pp. 2, 40.
  95. WoRMS database for A. linckii, etc.
  96. Stella Arborescens was later classed in the old-Astrophyton genus containing several species,[93][94] but it would now be obsolete to say Stella Arborescens belongs to the Astrophyton genus which now admits only a single New World species. One genus that would be applicable would be Gorgonocephalus because the 3 species A. linckii, A. eucnemis, A. lamarcki which occur in northern Europe according to Lyman,[93] all of which are given modern accepted assignments as Gorgonocephalus spp.[95]
  97. Pontoppidan (1755), p. 216.
  98. The London Magazine, or, Gentleman's Monthly Intelligencer Vol. 24 (Appendix, 1755). pp. 622–624.
  99. The original passage in the English translation reads:
    "the Kraken.. with his many large horns or branches, as it were springing up from its body, which is round.. Both these descriptions [arbor and kraken] confirm my former suppositions, namely, that this Sea-animal belongs to the Polype or Star-fish species.. It seems to be of that Polypus kind which is called by the Dutch Zee-sonne, by Rondeletius and Gesner Stella Arborescens.[97][98]
  100. Heuvelmans (2015), p. 78.
  101. Heuvelmans (2015), p. 124: "From the vague description given by the fishermen, it was just as legitimate to see in the kraken a giant ophiurid as a giant cephalopod".
  102. Pontoppidan (1753a), p. 350; Pontoppidan (1755), p. 216
  103. Pontoppidan noted that Medusa's head (Lat. pl. capita Medusæ) is identified as Stella Arborescens by the naturalist Griffith Hughes.
  104. Bergen (1761), pp. 147–149.
  105. Heuvelmans (2015), p. 126.
  106. Heuvelmans refers to "Gorgon's head",[105] which conservatively speaking refers to family Gorgonocephalidae, but there is also the Gorgonocephalus genus, of which G. caputmedusae is the modern accepted name of Astrophyton linckii[80] which Lyman hesitantly guesses may be Linnaeus's "Medusa's head"[?],[81] and G. eucnemis was F. J. Bell's prime candidate for the proper name of "Shetland Argus", which he thought may be unreliably referred to by Linnaeus and Pontoppidan by the name of Asterias caput-medusæ.[84]
  107. Stöhr, S.; O’Hara, T.; Thuy, B. (Eds) (2021). "Asterias euryale Retzius, 1783". WoRMS. World Register of Marine Species. Retrieved 28 January 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  108. Metropolitana (1845), p. 258: German physician Blumenbach summarized on what the "Northern Naturalist consider.. the young of the Kraken", and added Asterias euryale and "Euryale Verrucosum of Lamarack" to the list.
  109. Stöhr, S.; O’Hara, T.; Thuy, B. (Eds) (2022). "Euryale verrucosum Lamarck, 1816". WoRMS. World Register of Marine Species. Retrieved 28 January 2022.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  110. Blumenbach apud Metropolitana (1845), p. 258 loc. cit.
  111. Palomares ML, Pauly D, eds. (2022). "Astrocladu exiguus" in SeaLifeBase. January 2022 version.
  112. Euryale verrucosum Lamarck is matched to accepted name Astrocladus exiguus,[109] which occurs in the Pacific.[111]
  113. Pontoppidan (1753a), pp. 351–352; Pontoppidan (1755), p. 217
  114. Gerhardt, Mia I. (1966). "Knowledge in decline: Ancient and medieval information on "ink-fishes" and their habits". Vivarium. 4: 151, 152. doi:10.1163/156853466X00079. JSTOR 41963484.
  115. Denys-Montfort (1801), pp. 256, 258–259.
  116. Naturalis Historiae lib. ix. cap. 30 apud Lee (1875), pp. 99, 100–103 and Montfort, ibid.
  117. Nigg (2014), p. 148.
  118. Gerhardt (1966), p. 152.
  119. Natural History, Book IX, Loeb edition. According to Pliny's source, Trebius Niger: "..for it struggles with him by coiling round him and it swallows him with sucker-cups and drags him asunder by its multiple suction, when it attacks men that have been shipwrecked or are diving".[117][118]
  120. cf. Ashton (1890), pp. 264–265
  121. Wilson, Andrew (FRSE) (February 1887a). "Science and Crime, and other essay". The Humboldt Library of Science (88): 23.
  122. Denys-Montfort (1801), p. 386.
  123. Lee (1875), p. 100.
  124. Denys-Montfort (1801), p. 386, note (1) Arbor marinus.
  125. Denys-Montfort (1801), p. 386, note (1)
  126. Mitchill (1813), p. 405.
  127. Paullinus, Christianus Franciscus (1678). Obs . LI: De Singulari monstro marino. Miscellanea curiosa sive Ephemeridum medico -physicarum germanicarum Academiæ naturae curiosorum. Vol. Ann. VIII. Vratislaviae et Bregae. p. 79.
  128. Lovén, Sven (1887). On the Species of Echinoidea Described by Linnaeus in His Museum Ludovicae Ulricae. Stockholm: Kungliga Boktryckeriet P. A. Norstedt & Söner. pp. 20–21, note 2.
  129. Heuvelmans (2015), p. 91.
  130. Denys-Montfort (1801), p. 270–278: "nouveau testament attribué a Saint-Thomas" (p. 276)
  131. Hamilton (1839), pp. 331–332 and Plate XXX, p. 326a
  132. Packard: "Denys Montfort took the cue, and.. represented a "kraken octopod" in the act of scuttling a three-master.."[2]
  133. Denys-Montfort (1801), p. 331.
  134. Denys-Montfort (1801), pp. 358ff, 367–368
  135. Metropolitana (1845), p. 258.
  136. Lee (1875), pp. 103–105 and note
  137. d' Orbigny, Alcide (1848). "Poulpe colossal / Sepia gigas". Histoire naturelle générale et particulière des Céphalopodes acétabulifères vivants et fossiles: Texte. Vol. 1. J. B. Baillière. p. 143. ISBN 9781461748960.: "Si nous Poulpe Colossal est admis, à la seconde édition je lui ferai renverser une escadre".
  138. Lee (1875), p. 103.
  139. Mitchill (1813), pp. 396–397. Captioned Sepia octopus. Mitchill (1813), p. 401: Linnaeus's Sepia octopus is explained to be the eight-armed animal called poulpe commun by the French, and which was neither the cuttlefish which have scales, nor squid which have plated.
  140. Linnaeus, Carolus (1735). Caroli Linnæi Systema naturæ (1 ed.). Leyden: Theodorus Haak.
  141. Linnaeus, Carolus (1740). Langen, Johann Joachim (tr.) (ed.). Caroli Linnæi Systema naturæ [Natur=Systema, oder, Drey Reiche der Natur] (1 ed.). Halle: Gebauer. p. 68. Corpus variis heterogeneis tectum. Microcosmus marinus. Der Leib ist mit verschiedenen fremden Theilchen bedeckt. Die meer=Traube
  142. Linnaeus, Carolus (1748). Caroli Linnæi Systema naturæ (6 ed.). Stockholm: Gottfr. Kiesewetter. p. 78. (in Latin) (in Swedish)
  143. Linnaeus, Carolus (1740). Caroli Linnæi Systema naturæ (2 ed.). Stockholm: Gottfr. Kiesewetter. p. 64.
  144. Lovén (1887), p. 14, note 2.
  145. Bartholin, Thomas (1657). "Historia XXIV. Cetorum genera". Thomae Bartholini historiarum anatomicarum rariorum centuria [III et ]IV (in Latin). typis Petri Hakii, acad. typogr. p. 283.
  146. Redi, Francesco (1684). Osservazioni interno agli animali viventi che se trovano negli animali viventi. Christoph Günther. pp. 61, 217–218. and Tab. 21
  147. Redi, Francesco (1686). Observationes Franisci Redi circa animalia viventia, quae reperiuntur in animalibus viventibus. Florentiae apud P. Batini 1684 in 4to. Acta eruditorum. Christoph Günther. p. 84.
  148. "Linné (Carl von)". Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections. Smithsonian Institution. 1874. pp. 31–32.
  149. Linnaeus, Carolus (1748). Caroli Linnæi Systema naturæ (7 ed.). Leipzig: Gottfr. Kiesewetter. p. 75. (in Latin) (in German)
  150. Heuvelmans, Bernard (2015) [2006]. Kraken & The Colossal Octopus. Routledge. pp. 117–118. ISBN 9781317847014.
  151. Linnaeus, Carolus (1756). Caroli Linnæi Systema naturæ (9 ed.). Leyden: Theodorus Haak. p. 82. (in Latin) (in French)
  152. Heuvelmans (2015), p. 147?.
  153. Mitchill (1813), pp. 402–203: "[Mr. Montfort's].. gigantic Sepia.. [which he] calls Colossal". Also Mitchill, passim. gives Sepia octopus (recté octopodia).
  154. Figuier, Louis (1866). La vie et les moeurs des animaux zoophytes et mollusques par Louis Figuier. Paris: L. Hachette et C.ie. p. 463.
  155. Heuvelmans (2015), p. 118, note 2: "..incorrectly claimed, following Louis Figuier (1860) and later Alfred Moquin-Tandon (1865) that Linnaeus had classified the kraken as the cephalopod Sepia microcosmus. This is completely false.
  156. Ellis, Richard (2006). Singing Whales and Flying Squid: The Discovery Of Marine Life. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 143. ISBN 9781461748960.
  157. The notion that Linnaeus mentioned the kraken in 1735 has been taken to be fact by Bushnell (2019), p. 56, and Richard Ellis in 2006 also assumed the Sepia microcosmus was present in the first edition, concluding therefore it was removed by the time a later edition appeared.[156]
  158. Linnaeus, Carolus (1806), "47. Sepia", A general system of nature, translated by Turton, William, London: Printed for Lackington, Allen, and Co, p. 118
  159. Gibson, John (1887). "Chapter VI: The Legendary Kraken". Monsters of the Sea, Legendary and Authentic. London: T. Nelson. pp. 79–86 (plate, p. 83). Archived from the original on 24 August 2017 – via Biodiversity.
  160. Moquin-Tandon (1865), p. 311 also remarks on the pictorial representation of the kraken to "the giant Cephalopods embracing a tall ship in his huge arms, aiming to swallow it", though the work cited is Sonnini de Manoncourt, Suites à Buffon.
  161. More, A. G. (July 1875), "Notice of a gigantic Cephalopod (Dinoteuthis proboscideus) which was stranded at Dingle, in Kerry, two hundred years ago", Zoologist: A Monthly Journal of Natural History, Second series, 10: 4526–4532
  162. Heuvelmans (2015), pp. 141–142.
  163. Ashton (1890). Curious Creatures p. 244. Ashton also reproduces Olaus's illustrations in pp. 262–263.
  164. Plautius, Caspar (aka Honorius Philoponus) (1621), Nova Typis Transacta Navigatio: Novi Orbis Indiae Occidentalis, pp. 10a–11
  165. Olaus Magnus (1555). "Liber XXI. De Polypis: Cap. XXXIIII". Historia de gentibus septentrionalibus. Rome: Giovanni M. Viotto. p. 763.
  166. Laist, David W. (2017). North Atlantic Right Whales: From Hunted Leviathan to Conservation Icon. Johns Hopkins University Press. p. 24. ISBN 9781421420981.
  167. "American-Scandinavian Biography for 1969 Scandinavian Studies 42 (3), . Brief notice of Ashton (1968) [1890], Detroit: Singing Tree Press.
  168. Ashton (1890), pp. 221–222.
  169. Ashton (1890), pp. 261–265.
  170. Ashton (1890), p. 244.
  171. Ashton (1890), p. 262.
  172. Ashton (1890), p. 263.
  173. See fig. above, detail of Carta marina.
  174. Lee (1884), "Chapter: The Great Sea Serpent", p. 58: "From the crude image of a lobster having eight minor claws.. the transition is not great; and I believe that this also is a pictorial misrepresentation of a casualty by the attack of a calamary above described, .."
  175. Olaus Magnus (1887) [1539], p. 427
  176. Olaus Magnus (1887) [1539], p. 12: "G: Totius tabulae indicem partemque regnorum Anglie Scotie et Hollandie demonstrat" is the entire text. There is no description here of the lobster-like monster labeled "M" in the map, unlike other beasts which are described.
  177. Olaus Magnus (1887) [1539], p. 12, note 5: "..Die geogr. Länge beginnt bald bei Irland, bald bei den Inseln "Fortunate"
  178. Feest, Christian F. (1986), "Zemes Idolum Diabolicum: Surprise and success in Ethnographic Kunstkammer Research", Archiv für Völkerkunde, 40: 181; snippet via Google.
  179. The "Insula Fortunate" is situated next to St. Brendan's in the engraving in Caspar Plautius's book (1621),[164] engraved by Wolfgang Kilian[178]
  180. Lee (1884), pp. 364–366.
  181. Verrill (1882), pp. 262–267.
  182. Verrill (1882), pp. 213, 410.
  183. Rogers, Julia Ellen (1920). "The Giant Squids: Genus Architeuthis, Steenstrup". The Shell Book: a popular guide to a knowledge of the families of living mollusks. The Nature Library 15. Garden City: Doubleday, Page & Company. pp. 456–458.
  184. Wilson, Andrew (FRSE) (1887b). "V. The Past and Present of the Cuttlefishes". Studies in Life and Sense. Chatto & Windus. pp. 108–109.
  185. Perkins, Sid (2011). "Kraken versus ichthyosaur: let battle commence". Nature. doi:10.1038/news.2011.586. Retrieved 2 December 2020.
  186. "The Meniscus: The Kraken Sleepeth". 16 October 2011.
  187. Cahill, James Leo (2019). Zoological Surrealism: The Nonhuman Cinema of Jean Painlevé. U of Minnesota Press. ISBN 9781452959221.
  188. Hugo, Victor (1866). Les travailleurs de la mer. Lacroix. p. 88.
  189. Weiss, Allen S. (2002). "4 The Epic of the Cephalopod". Feast and Folly: Cuisine, Intoxication, and the Poetics of the Sublime. SUNY Press. pp. 73–75. ISBN 9780791455180.: repr. from Weiss (Winter 2002) in: Discourse 24 (1: Mortals to Death ), Wayne State University Press, pp. 150–159, JSTOR 41389633
  190. Bhattacharjee, Shuhita (1657). "The Colonial Idol, the Animalistic, and the New Woman in the Imperial Gothic of Richard Marsh". In Heholt, Ruth; Edmundson, Melissa (eds.). Gothic Animals: Uncanny Otherness and the Animal With-Out. Springer Nature. p. 259. ISBN 9783030345402.
  191. Nigg (2014), p. 147.
  192. Verne, Jules (1993). Miller, Walter James; Walter, Frederick Paul (tr.) (eds.). Jules Verne's Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea: The Definitive Unabridged Edition Based on the Original French Texts. Naval Institute Press. p. note 13. ISBN 9781557508775.
  193. "The Kraken (1830)". Victorianweb.org. 11 January 2005. Retrieved 21 November 2011.
  194. Melville, Herman (2001) [1851]. Moby Dick; Or, The Whale. Project Gutenberg.
  195. Stowell, Barbara A. (2009). "Under the Sea: The Kraken in Culture". cgdclass.com. Archived from the original on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 8 April 2019.

Bibliography
Look up Kraken in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Wikisource has original text related to this article:
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.