Cult of personality

A cult of personality, or a cult of the leader,[1] is the result of an effort which is made to create an idealized and heroic image of a leader by a government, often through unquestioning flattery and praise. Historically, it has developed through techniques of mass media, propaganda, fake news, spectacle, the arts, patriotism, and government-organized demonstrations and rallies. A cult of personality is similar to apotheosis, except that it is established by modern social engineering techniques, usually by the state or the party in one-party states and dominant-party states. A cult of personality often accompanies the leader of a totalitarian or authoritarian countries. It can also be seen in some monarchies, theocracies, and failed democracies.

Soviet poster featuring Stalin, Soviet Azerbaijan, 1938

Background
Augustus of Prima Porta, 1st century CE

Throughout history, monarchs and other heads of state were often held in enormous reverence and imputed super-human qualities. Through the principle of the divine right of kings, notably in medieval Europe, rulers were said to hold office by the will of God. Ancient Egypt, Imperial Japan, the Inca, the Aztecs, Tibet, Siam (now Thailand), and the Roman Empire are especially noted for redefining monarchs as "god-kings". Furthermore, the Imperial cult of ancient Rome identified emperors and some members of their families with the divinely sanctioned authority (auctoritas) of the Roman State.

The spread of democratic and secular ideas in Europe and North America in the 18th and 19th centuries made it increasingly difficult for monarchs to preserve this aura. However, the subsequent development of mass media, such as radio, enabled political leaders to project a positive image of themselves onto the masses as never before. It was from these circumstances in the 20th century that the most notorious personality cults arose. Often these cults are a form of political religion.[2]

The advent of the Internet and the World Wide Web in the 21st century has renewed the personality cult phenomenon. Disinformation via social media platforms and the twenty-four hour news cycle has enabled the widespread dissemination and acceptance of deceptive information and propaganda.[3] As a result, personality cults have grown and remained popular in many places, corresponding with a marked rise in authoritarian government across the world.[4]

The term "cult of personality" probably appeared in English around 1800–1850, along with the French and German use.[5] At first, it had no political connotations, but was instead closely related to the Romanticist "cult of genius".[5] The first political use of the phrase appeared in a letter from Karl Marx to German political worker Wilhelm Blos dated to November 10, 1877:[5]

Neither of us cares a straw of popularity. Let me cite one proof of this: such was my aversion to the personality cult [orig. Personenkultus] that at the time of the International, when plagued by numerous moves ... to accord me public honor, I never allowed one of these to enter the domain of publicity ...[5][6]

Ho Chi Minh statue in front of the City Hall of Ho Chi Minh City (formerly known as Saigon) in Vietnam

Characteristics

There are various views about what constitutes a cult of personality in a leader. Historian Jan Plamper wrote that modern-day personality cults display five characteristics that set them apart from "their predecessors": The cults are secular and "anchored in popular sovereignty"; their objects are all males; they target the entire population, not only the well-to-do or just the ruling class; they use mass media; they exist where the mass media can be controlled enough to inhibit the introduction of "rival cults".[7]

In his 2013 paper, "What is character and why it really does matter", Thomas A. Wright stated, "The cult of personality phenomenon refers to the idealized, even god-like, public image of an individual consciously shaped and molded through constant propaganda and media exposure. As a result, one is able to manipulate others based entirely on the influence of public personality ... the cult of personality perspective focuses on the often shallow, external images that many public figures cultivate to create an idealized and heroic image."[8]

Adrian Teodor Popan defined a cult of personality as a "quantitatively exaggerated and qualitatively extravagant public demonstration of praise of the leader." He also identified three causal "necessary, but not sufficient, structural conditions, and a path-dependent chain of events which, together, lead to the cult formation: a particular combination of patrimonialism and clientelism, lack of dissidence, and systematic falsification pervading the society's culture."[9]

One underlying characteristic, as explained by John Pittman, is the nature of the cult of personalities to be a patriarch. The idea of the cult of personalities that coincides with the Marxist movements gains popular footing among the men in power with the idea that they would be the "fathers of the people". By the end of the 1920s, the male features of the cults became more extreme. Pittman identifies that these features became roles including the "formal role for a [male] 'great leader' as a cultural focus of the apparatus of the regime: reliance on top-down 'administrative measures': and a pyramidal structure of authority" which was created by a single ideal.[10]

The role of mass media

The mass media have played an instrumental role in forging national leaders' cults of personality. The modern cult of personality has arisen in large part due to how the leader is presented through the media. The modern cult of personality developed alongside the media. The twentieth century brought technological advancements that made it possible for regimes to package propaganda in the form of radio broadcasts, films, and later content on the internet. Today, governments are capable of isolating citizens from the outside world and creating a monopoly of what citizens have access to, making it much easier to foster a cult of personality.

Writing in 2013, Thomas A. Wright observed that "[i]t is becoming evident that the charismatic leader, especially in politics, has increasingly become the product of media and self-exposure."[8] Focusing on the media in the United States, Robert N. Bellah added, "It is hard to determine the extent to which the media reflect the cult of personality in American politics and to what extent they have created it. Surely they did not create it all alone, but just as surely they have contributed to it. In any case, American politics is dominated by the personalities of political leaders to an extent rare in the modern world ... in the personalized politics of recent years the 'charisma' of the leader may be almost entirely a product of media exposure."[11]

Purpose
Statue of Mao Zedong in China

Often, a single leader became associated with this revolutionary transformation and came to be treated as a benevolent "guide" for the nation without whom the claimed transformation to a better future could not occur. Generally, this has been the justification for personality cults that arose in totalitarian societies, such as those of Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, and Mao Zedong.

Admiration for Mao Zedong has remained widespread in China in spite of his actions. In December 2013, a Global Times poll revealed that over 85% of Chinese viewed Mao's achievements as outweighing his mistakes.[12]

Jan Plamper argues while Napoleon III made some innovations in France, it was Benito Mussolini in Italy in the 1920s who originated the model of dictator-as-cult-figure that was emulated by Hitler, Stalin and the others, using the propaganda powers of a totalitarian state.[13]

Pierre du Bois de Dunilac argues that the Stalin cult was elaborately constructed to legitimize his rule. Many deliberate distortions and falsehoods were used.[14] The Kremlin refused access to archival records that might reveal the truth, and key documents were destroyed. Photographs were altered and documents were invented.[15] People who knew Stalin were forced to provide "official" accounts to meet the ideological demands of the cult, especially as Stalin himself presented it in 1938 in Short Course on the History of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks), which became the official history.[16]

Historian David L. Hoffmann states "The Stalin cult was a central element of Stalinism, and as such it was one of the most salient features of Soviet rule ... Many scholars of Stalinism cite the cult as integral to Stalin's power or as evidence of Stalin's megalomania."[17]

In Latin America, Cas Mudde and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser link the "cult of the leader" to the concept of the caudillo, a strong leader "who exercises a power that is independent of any office and free of any constraint." These populist strongmen are portrayed as "masculine and potentially violent" and enhance their authority through the use of the cult of personality. Mudde and Kaltwasser trace the linkage back to Juan Peron of Argentina.[1]

States and systems with personality cults

Argentina
See also: Peronism and Evita Perón

Juan Perón, who was elected three times as President of Argentina, and his second wife, Eva "Evita" Perón, were immensely popular among many of the Argentine people, and to this day they are still considered icons by the leading Justicialist Party. In contrast, academics and detractors often considered him a demagogue and a dictator. Peron sympathised with the Axis powers when he was a colonel and Minister of War[18] and even served as a diplomatic envoy to Fascist Italy. During his regime he kept close ties with Francoist Spain. He ferociously persecuted dissents and potential political rivals, as political arrests were common during his first two terms. He eroded the republican principles of the country as a way to stay in power and forced statewide censorship on most media.[19] Following his election, he built a personality cult around both himself and his wife so pervasive it is still a part of Argentina's current political life.[20] During his regime, schools were forced to read Evita's biography La Razón de mi Vida, union and government jobs were only given to those who could prove themselves to be a fervent Peronist, newspapers were censored and television and radio networks were nationalized, and only state media was allowed. He often showed contempt for any opponents, regularly characterizing them as traitors and agents of foreign powers. Those who didn't fall in line or were perceived as a threat to Perón's political power were subject to losing their jobs, threats, violence and harassment. Perón fired over 20,000 university professors and faculty members from all major public education institutions.[21] Universities were then intervened, the faculty was pressured to get in line and those who resisted were blacklisted, fired or exiled. Numerous prominent cultural and intellectual figures were imprisoned.[22] Thousands of artists, scientists, writers and academics left the country, migrated to North America or Europe. Union leader and political rivals were arrested and tortured for years[23][24] and were only released after Perón was deposed.[25]

Mao Zedong

Mao Zedong's cult of personality was a prominent part of Chairman Mao Zedong's rule over the People's Republic of China from his rise in 1949 until his death in 1976. Mass media, propaganda and a series of other techniques were used by the state to elevate Mao Zedong's status to that of an infallible heroic leader, who could stand up against The West, and guide China to become a beacon of Communism. Mao himself, however, publicly criticized the personality cult which was formed around him.[26]

During the period of Cultural Revolution, Mao's personality cult soared to an unprecedented height. Mao's face was firmly established on the front page of People's Daily, where a column of his quotes was also printed every day. Mao's Selected Works were later printed in even greater circulation; the number of his portraits (1.2 billion) was more than the inhabitants in China. And soon Chairman Mao badges began to appear; in total, about 4.8 billion were manufactured.[27] Every Chinese citizen was presented with the Little Red Book - a selection of quotes from Mao. It was prescribed to be carried everywhere and displayed at all public events, and citizens were expected to quote the contents of the book daily.[28]

After the Cultural Revolution, Deng Xiaoping and others launched the "Boluan Fanzheng" program which invalidated the Cultural Revolution and abandoned (and forbade) the use of a personality cult.[29][30][31] However, since Xi Jinping succeeded as the General Secretary of the Chinese Communist Party in 2012, the cult of personality has been promoted again in China.[32][33]

Xi Jinping

A cult of personality has been developing around Xi Jinping since he became General Secretary of the ruling Chinese Communist Party and the regime's paramount leader in 2012.[34][35][36][37][38]

Fascist Italy
"Kids, you have to love Benito Mussolini. He always works for the good of the Fatherland and the Italian people. You have heard this many times, from your dad, mom, or teacher: If Italy is now far more powerful than before, we owe it to Him." (1936 textbook)

Benito Mussolini was portrayed as the embodiment of Italian Fascism and was keen to be seen as such.[39] Mussolini was styled by other Italian fascists as Il Duce ("The Leader"). Since Mussolini was represented as an almost omniscient leader, a common saying in Italy during Mussolini's rule was "The Duce is always right" (Italian: Il Duce ha sempre ragione).[40] Mussolini became a unifying force in Italy in order for ordinary Italians to put their difference to one side with local officials. The personality cult surrounding Mussolini became a way for him to justify his personal rule and it acted as a way to enable social and political integration.

Mussolini's military service in World War I and survival of failed assassination attempts were used to convey a mysterious aura around him.[41] Fascist propaganda stated that Mussolini's body had been pierced by shrapnel just like St. Sebastian had been pierced by arrows, the difference being that Mussolini had survived this ordeal.[41] Mussolini was also compared to St. Francis of Assisi, who had, like Mussolini, "suffered and sacrificed himself for others".[42]

The press were given instructions on what and what not to write about Mussolini.[39] Mussolini himself authorized which photographs of him were allowed to be published and rejected any photographs which made him appear weak or less prominent than he wanted to be portrayed as in a particular group.[43]

Italy's war against Ethiopia (1935–37) was portrayed in propaganda as a revival of the Roman Empire, with Mussolini as the first Roman emperor Augustus.[44] To improve his own image, as well as the image of Fascism in the Arab world, Mussolini declared himself to be the "Protector of Islam" during an official visit to Libya in 1937.[45]

India

India's first prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru was known to foster a personality cult around himself. Many leaders opposed Nehru's style of functioning, his economic policies, and his socialist agenda. C Rajagopalachari criticized the personality cult surrounding Nehru, saying that there should be an opposition group within the Congress because it was running with "accelerators and no brakes" without a true opposition. Rajagopalachari later formed the liberal Swatantra Party because of his opposition to Nehru's style of functioning.[46] The expression 'Nehruvian consensus' reflects the dominance of Nehruvian ideals, a product of Nehru's personality cult and the associated statism, i.e. the overarching faith in the state and the leadership.[47] The Congress party has been accused of propagating a personality cult centered around Nehru, his daughter Indira Gandhi & the Nehru-Gandhi family.[48]

Current Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is often criticized for creating a personality cult around him.[49][50] Despite some setbacks and criticism,[51][52][53] Modi's charisma and popularity was a key factor that helped the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) return to power in the 2019 Parliament elections.[54] Shivraj Singh Chouhan, the chief minister of the country's second largest state, said in 2022, "He is superhuman and has traces of god in him."[55] Opposition often accused Modi for spreading propaganda using popular media such as movies, television and web series,[56][57][58][59] while the BJP has protested against a reality show in Tamil Nadu in which two children performed a skit about a vain and foppish king.[55]

Nazi Germany
Adolf Hitler at the Nuremberg Rally in 1936

Starting in the 1920s, during the early years of the Nazi Party, Nazi propaganda began to depict the Nazi leader Adolf Hitler as a demagogue figure who was the almighty defender and savior of Germany. After the end of World War I and the Treaty of Versailles, the German people were left in turmoil under the Weimar Republic, and, according to Nazi propaganda, only Hitler could save them and restore Germany's greatness, which in turn gave rise to the "Führer-cult".[60] During the five election campaigns in 1932, the Nazi newspaper Völkischer Beobachter portrayed Hitler as a man who had a mass movement united behind him, a man with one mission to solely save Germany as the 'Leader of the coming Germany'.[61] The Night of the Long Knives in 1934 – after which Hitler referred to himself as being single-handedly "responsible for the fate of the German people" – also helped to reinforce the myth that Hitler was the sole protector of the Volksgemeinschaft, the ethnic community of the German people.[62]

Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels cultivated an image of Hitler as a "heroic genius".[60] The myth also gave rise to the saying and concept, "If only the Führer knew". Germans thought that problems which they ascribed to the Nazi hierarchy would not have occurred if Hitler had been aware of the situation; thus Nazi bigwigs were blamed, and Hitler escaped criticism.[62]

British historian Ian Kershaw published his book The "Hitler Myth": Image and Reality in the Third Reich in 1987 and wrote:

Hitler stood for at least some things they [German people] admired, and for many had become the symbol and embodiment of the national revival which the Third Reich had in many respects been perceived to accomplish.[63]

During the early 1930s, the myth was given credence due to Hitler's perceived ability to revive the German economy during the Great Depression. However, Albert Speer wrote that by 1939, the myth was under threat and the Nazis had to organize cheering crowds to turn up to events. Speer wrote:

The shift in the mood of the population, the drooping morale which began to be felt throughout Germany in 1939, was evident in the necessity to organize cheering crowds where two years earlier Hitler had been able to count on spontaneity. What is more, he himself had meanwhile moved away from the admiring masses. He tended to be angry and impatient more often than in the past when, as still occasionally happened, a crowd on Wilhelmsplatz began clamoring for him to appear. Two years before he had often stepped out on the "historic balcony." Now he sometimes snapped at his adjutants when they came to him with the request that he show himself: "Stop bothering me with that!"[64]

The myth helped to unite the German people during World War II, especially against the Soviet Union and the Western Allies. During Hitler's early victories against Poland and Western Europe the myth was at its peak, but when it became obvious to most Germans that the war was lost then the myth was exposed and Hitler's popularity declined.

A report is given in the little Bavarian town of Markt Schellenberg on March 11, 1945:

When the leader of the Wehrmacht unit at the end of his speech called for a Sieg Heil for the Führer, it was returned neither by the Wehrmacht present, nor by the Volkssturm, nor by the spectators of the civilian population who had turned up. This silence of the masses ... probably reflects better than anything else, the attitudes of the population.[65]

North Korea
North Korean poster featuring Kim Il-Sung

The North Korean cult of personality surrounding its ruling family, the Kim family,[66] has existed for decades and can be found in many examples of North Korean culture.[67] Although not acknowledged by the North Korean government, many defectors and Western visitors state there are often stiff penalties for those who criticize or do not show "proper" respect for the regime.[68][69] The personality cult began soon after Kim Il-sung took power in 1948, and was greatly expanded after his death in 1994.

The pervasiveness and extreme nature of North Korea's personality cult surpasses that of even Joseph Stalin or Mao Zedong.[70] The cult is also marked by the intensity of the people's feelings for and devotion to their leaders,[71] and the key role played by a Confucianized ideology of familism both in maintaining the cult and thereby in sustaining the regime itself. The North Korean cult of personality is a large part of Juche and totalitarianism.

Philippines
This section is an excerpt from Ferdinand Marcos's cult of personality.[edit]

Ferdinand Marcos developed a cult of personality as a way of remaining President of the Philippines for 20 years,[72][73] in a way that political scientists have compared to other authoritarian and totalitarian leaders such as Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler,[74] but also to more contemporary dictators such as Sukarno and Suharto in Indonesia, Saddam Hussein in Iraq, and the Kim dynasty of North Korea.[75]: p114 

The propaganda techniques used, either by himself or by others, to mythologize Ferdinand Marcos, began with local political machinations in Ilocos Norte while Ferdinand was still the young son of politician and Japanese collaborator Mariano Marcos,[76] and persist today in the efforts to revise the way Marcos is portrayed in Philippine history.[77] According to members of his administration, such as Adrian Cristobal, Marcos's intent was to project an image of himself "the only patron, the king" of Philippine society, which he still saw as a society of tribes."[78] Cristobal furthers that "Marcos and the First Lady wanted more than anything else [...] to be king and queen. They wished to shape the kingdom in their own image; [...] Marcos wanted to be able to say, 'L'état c'est moi.'"[78] In some extreme cases where Marcos encouraged the formation of cults so that they could serve as a political weapon, Marcos came to be thought of as a God.[79]

These propaganda narratives and techniques include: using red scare tactics such as red-tagging to portray activists as communists and to exaggerate the threat represented by the Communist Party of the Philippines;[80]: "43"  using martial law to take control of mass media and silence criticism;[81] the use of foreign-funded government development projects and construction projects as propaganda tools;[82] creating an entire propaganda framework around a "new society" in which he would rule under a system of "constitutional authoritarianism";[83][77][84] the perpetuation of hagiographical books and films;[85][86] the perpetuation of propaganda narratives about Marcos's activities during World War II, which have since been proven false by historical documents;[87][88] the creation of myths and stories around himself and his family;[89][90] and portrayals of himself in coinage and even a Mount Rushmore type monument;[91] among others.”

Since Ferdinand Marcos's death, propaganda efforts have been made to whitewash his place in Philippine history,[92][93] an act of historical negationism[94] commonly referred to using the more popular term "historical revisionism."[95]

Soviet Union
Propaganda poster of Lenin and Stalin

The first cult of personality to take shape in the USSR was Vladimir Lenin. Up until the dissolution of the USSR, Lenin's portrait and quotes were a ubiquitous part of the culture. However, during his lifetime, Lenin vehemently denounced any effort to build a cult of personality as in his eyes the cult of personality was antithetical to Marxism.[96] Despite this, members of the Communist Party further used Lenin's image as the all knowing revolutionary who would liberate the proletariat. Lenin attempted to take action against this; however it was halted as Lenin was nearly assassinated in August 1918. His health would only further decline as he suffered numerous severe strokes with the worst in May 1922 and March 1923. In this state Lenin would lose the ability to walk and speak. It was during this time that the Communist Party began to promote the accomplishments of Lenin as the basis for his cult of personality, using him as an image of morality and revolutionary ideas.[10]

After Vladimir Lenin's death in 1924 and the exile of Leon Trotsky, Joseph Stalin came to embody the Soviet Union. Once Lenin's cult of personality had risen in power, creating enough influence, Stalin integrated his ideals into his own cult.[96] Unlike other cults of personalities, the Lenin and Stalin cults were not created to give the leaders power, they were created to give power and validation to the Communist Party. Stalin initially spoke out against the cult and other outrageous and false claims centered around him. However Stalin's attitude began to shift in favor of the cult in the 1930s and he began to encourage it following the Great Purge.[97] Seldom did Stalin object to state actions that furthered his cult of personality, however he did oppose some initiatives from Soviet propagandists. When Nikolai Yezhov proposed to rename Moscow to "Stalinodar", which translates to "gift of Stalin", Stalin objected.[98] To merge the idea of the Lenin and Stalin cults together, Stalin changed aspects of Lenin's life in the public's eye in order to place himself in power. This kept the two cults in a line that showed that both Lenin and Stalin had the same ideas and that Stalin was the rightful successor of Lenin, leading the USSR in the fashion Lenin would have.[96]

In December 1929, Stalin celebrated his 50th birthday which made Stalin become a prominent feature in the Soviet press.[99] The Soviet press used positive adjectives like, "Great", "Beloved", "Bold", "Wise", "Inspirer", and "Genius" to describe him.[100] Similarly, speeches that were given by people to the peasants described Stalin as "Our Best Collective Farm Worker", "Our Shockworker, Our Best of Best", and "Our Darling, Our Guiding Star".[100] By 1934, under Stalin's full control of the country, socialist realism became the endorsed method of art and literature.[97] Even under the communist regime, the Stalin cult of personality portrayed Stalin's leadership as patriarchy under the features laid out during Khrushchev's speech.[10] After 1936, the Soviet press described Stalin as the "Father of Nations".[101]

One key element of Soviet propaganda was interactions between Stalin and the children of the Soviet Union. He was often photographed with children of different ethnic backgrounds of the Soviet Union and was often photographed giving gifts to children. In 1935 the phrase, "Thank You, Dear Comrade Stalin, for a Happy Childhood!" started to appear above doorways at nurseries, orphanages, and schools; children also chanted this slogan at festivals.[102] Another key element of Soviet propaganda was imagery of Stalin and Lenin. In many posters, Stalin and Lenin were placed together to show their camaraderie and that their ideals were one. Throughout the 1930s, posters with both images were used as a way to bring the nation and the military together under the policies of the Communist Party during World War II, with the idea of Lenin as the father of the revolutionary ideas and Stalin as the disciple who would fulfill the communist ideals.[97] Stalin was also portrayed in numerous films produced by Mosfilm, which remained a Soviet-led company until the fall of the Soviet Union.

Turkey
Main articles: List of sultans of the Ottoman Empire, Neo-Ottomanism, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's cult of personality, Kemalism, Public image of Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and Erdoğanism
This section is an excerpt from List of cults of personality § Turkey.[edit]
Monument to Atatürk in Kadıköy, Istanbul

In Turkey, founder of the Turkish Republic Mustafa Kemal Atatürk is commemorated by a myriad of memorials throughout the country, such as the Atatürk International Airport in Istanbul, the Atatürk Bridge over the Golden Horn (Haliç), the Atatürk Dam, and Atatürk Stadium. His titles include Great Leader (Ulu Önder), Eternal Commander (Ebedî Başkomutan), Head Teacher (Başöğretmen), and Eternal Chief (Ebedî Şef). Atatürk statues have been erected in all Turkish cities by the Turkish Government, and most towns have their own memorial to him. His face and name are seen and heard everywhere in Turkey; his portrait can be seen in all public buildings, in all schools and classrooms, on all school textbooks, on all Turkish lira banknotes, and in the homes of many Turkish families.[103]

A wall rug of Erdoğan at a rally of his party

At the exact time of Atatürk's death, on every 10 November, at 09:05, most vehicles and people in the country's streets pause for one minute in remembrance.[104] In 1951, the Turkish Parliament issued a law (5816) outlawing insults to his reminiscence (Turkish: hatırasına alenen hakaret) or destruction of objects representing him, which is still in force.[105] A government website[106] was created to denounce the websites that violate this law, and the Turkish government as of 2011 has filters in place to block websites deemed to contain materials insulting to his memory.

The start of Atatürk's cult of personality is placed in the 1920s when the first statues started being built.[107] The idea of Atatürk as the "father of the Turks" is ingrained in Turkish politics and politicians in that country are evaluated in relation to his cult of personality.[108] The persistence of the phenomenon of Atatürk's personality cult has become an area of deep interest to scholars.[109]

Atatürk impersonators are also seen around Turkey much after Atatürk's death to preserve what is called the "world's longest-running personality cult".[110]

Ottoman sultans Mehmed the Conqueror and Abdul Hamid II have cults of personality created by religious conservatives and Islamists. They associate the policies of these statesmen with their "piety".

In recent years there has been a growing cult of personality in modern Turkey around current President of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdoğan.

The cults created for the sultans and Erdoğan are kept alive by devout Muslims who oppose secular lifestyle and secularist ideas.

See also
  • Authoritarian personality
  • Big Brother (Nineteen Eighty-Four)
  • Bolivarianism
  • Bonapartism
  • Bread and circuses
  • Celebrity worship syndrome
  • Charismatic authority
  • Chavismo
  • Communism
  • Cult of Personality (song)
  • Dictatorship
  • Erdoğanism
  • Fascism
  • Fujimorism
  • Gandhism
  • God complex
  • Great man theory
  • Halo effect
  • Horn effect
  • Hoxhaism
  • Kemalism
  • Khomeinism
  • Kirchnerism
  • Leaderism
  • Leninism
  • Lèse-majesté
  • List of cults of personality
  • List of messiah claimants
  • Maoism
  • Narcissism
  • Narcissistic leadership
  • Nasserism
  • Nazism
  • Peronism
  • Pinochetism
  • Putinism
  • Supreme leader
  • Sycophancy
  • Titoism
  • Trotskyism
  • Trumpism

References
  1. Mudde, Cas and Kaltwasser, Cristóbal Rovira (2017) Populism: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 63. ISBN 978-0190234874
  2. Plamper 2012, pp. 13–14.
  3. Pathak, Archita; Srihari, Rohini; Natu, Nihit (2021). "Disinformation: analysis and identification". Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory. United States National Library of Medicine. 27 (3): 357–375. doi:10.1007/s10588-021-09336-x. PMC 8212793. PMID 34177355.
  4. Talisse, Robert B. "Not all polarization is bad, but the US could be in trouble". The Conversation. Retrieved March 10, 2022.
  5. Heller, Klaus (2004). Heller, Klaus; Plamper, Jan (eds.). Personality Cults in Stalinism/Personenkulte im Stalinismus. Göttingen: V&R Unipress. pp. 23–33. ISBN 978-3899711912.
  6. Blos, Wilhelm. "Brief von Karl Marx an Wilhelm Blos". Denkwürdigkeiten eines Sozialdemokraten. Retrieved February 22, 2013.
  7. Plamper 2012, p. 222.
  8. Wright, Thomas A.; Lauer, Tyler L. (2013). "What is character and why it really does matter". Fordham University: Business Faculty Publications. Fordham University. 2: 29. Retrieved June 13, 2019.
  9. Popan, Adrian Teodor (August 2015). "The ABC of Sycophancy: Structural Conditions for the Emergence of Dictators' Cults of Personality" (PDF). University of Texas at Austin. doi:10.15781/T2J960G15. hdl:2152/46763. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  10. Pittman, John (2017). "Thoughts on the "Cult of Personality" in Communist History". The Russian Revolution One Century Later. 81 (4): 533–547. doi:10.1521/siso.2017.81.4.533 – via Guilford Press Periodicals.
  11. Bellah, Robert N. (1986). "The Meaning of Reputation in American Society". California Law Review. 74 (3): 747. doi:10.15779/Z386730. Archived from the original on April 26, 2019. Retrieved June 13, 2019.
  12. "Mao's achievements 'outweigh' mistakes: poll". al-Jazeera. December 23, 2013.
  13. Plamper 2012, pp. 4, 12–14.
  14. du Bois, Pierre (1984). "Stalin – Genesis of a Myth". Survey. A Journal of East & West Studies. 28 (1): 166–181. See abstract in Egan, David R.; Melinda A. Egan (2007). Joseph Stalin: An Annotated Bibliography of English-Language Periodical Literature to 2005. Scarecrow Press. p. 157. ISBN 978-0810866713.
  15. Strong, Carol; Killingsworth, Matt (2011). "Stalin the Charismatic Leader?: Explaining the 'Cult of Personality' as a legitimation technique". Politics, Religion & Ideology. 12 (4): 391–411. doi:10.1080/21567689.2011.624410. S2CID 144628885.
  16. Maslov, N. N. (1989). "Short Course of the History of the All-Russian Communist Party (Bolshevik) – An Encyclopedia of Stalin's Personality Cult". Soviet Studies in History. 28 (3): 41–68. doi:10.2753/RSH1061-1983280341.
  17. Hoffmann, David L. (2013). "The Stalin Cult". The Historian. 75 (4): 909. doi:10.1111/hisn.12023_65. S2CID 145070443.
  18. "Neighbor Accused". Time. February 18, 1946. Archived from the original on January 29, 2009.
  19. Martínez, Tomás Eloy (January 20, 1997). "The woman behind the fantasy. prostitute, fascist, profligate – Eva Perón was much maligned, mostly unfairly". Time. Archived from the original on December 21, 2001. Retrieved January 28, 2009.
  20. Politics and Education in Argentina, 1946–1962, by Mónica Esti Rein; trans by Martha Grenzeback. Published by M. E. Sharpe, Armonk, NY/London, 1998, pp. 79–80.
  21. Rock, David (1987). Argentina, 1516–1982. University of California Press.
  22. "Palermo online". Palermonline.com.ar. Retrieved January 27, 2011.
  23. Pigna, Felipe. "Ricardo Balbín". Elhistoriador.com.ar (in Spanish). El Historiador. Archived from the original on November 28, 2011. Retrieved December 14, 2020.
  24. Feitlowitz, Marguerite (2002). A Lexicon of Terror: Argentina and the Legacies of Torture. Oxford University Press.
  25. "Clarín". Clarin.com. August 2, 2001. Retrieved January 27, 2011.
  26. Lin, Xu and Wu 1995. p. 48.
  27. Barmé, Geremie. (1996). Shades of Mao : the posthumous cult of the great leader. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 0-585-26901-7. OCLC 45729144.
  28. Chang, Jung, 1952– (2007). Mao : the unknown story. Halliday, Jon. London: Vintage. ISBN 978-0-09-950737-6. OCLC 71346736.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  29. Teon, Aris (March 1, 2018). "Deng Xiaoping On Personality Cult And One-Man Rule – 1980 Interview". The Greater China Journal. Retrieved July 29, 2020.
  30. Huang, Zheping (February 26, 2018). "Xi Jinping could now rule China for life—just what Deng Xiaoping tried to prevent". Quartz. Retrieved July 29, 2020.
  31. "第八章: 十一届三中全会开辟社会主义事业发展新时期". cpc.people.com.cn. Retrieved July 29, 2020.
  32. Luqiu, Luwei Rose (December 1, 2016). "The Reappearance of the Cult of Personality in China". East Asia. 33 (4): 289–307. doi:10.1007/s12140-016-9262-x. ISSN 1874-6284. S2CID 152260841.
  33. "Xi personality cult brings back memories of 1960s China". South China Morning Post. August 7, 2018. Retrieved July 29, 2020.
  34. "The rise of the personality cult of Xi Jinping- La Croix International". international.la-croix.com. March 3, 2015. Archived from the original on July 26, 2019. Retrieved July 26, 2019.
  35. Zhu, Jiayang Fan, Taisu Zhang, Ying. "Behind the Personality Cult of Xi Jinping". Foreign Policy. Archived from the original on July 26, 2019. Retrieved July 26, 2019.
  36. "Xi Jinping Personality Cult". www.globalsecurity.org. Archived from the original on July 26, 2019. Retrieved July 26, 2019.
  37. "The worrying buildup of a personality cult around Xi: The Yomiuri Shimbun". The Straits Times. January 30, 2018. Archived from the original on July 26, 2019. Retrieved July 26, 2019.
  38. "The power of Xi Jinping". The Economist. September 18, 2014. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on July 26, 2019. Retrieved July 26, 2019.
  39. Hamilton 1973, p. 73.
  40. Bosworth 2006, p. 3.
  41. Falasca-Zamponi 2000, pp. 72–73.
  42. Falasca-Zamponi 2000, pp. 65–66.
  43. Gallo 1973, pp. 206–207.
  44. Brendon 2016, p. 329.
  45. Williams 2006, p. 112.
  46. Team, Lounge (May 24, 2014). "Nehru's India". mint.
  47. "Rise, and Demise of Nehruvian Consensus: A Historical Review" (PDF).
  48. "Chacha's Musty Coat-Tails". outlookindia.com/. February 5, 2022.
  49. Vaidyanathan, Rajini. "The 'personality politics' of Narendra Modi and Donald Trump". BBC. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  50. Chatterjee, Manini (May 13, 2019). "I, me, myself: The Modi cult could threaten the BJP too". The Telegraph. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  51. Vaishnav, Milan (May 25, 2019). "Opinion: If it's 'the economy, stupid,' why did Modi win?". Washington Post. Retrieved July 31, 2021.
  52. Khare, Harish (November 25, 2016). "The Cult of the Leader: Demonetisation and Modi Worship". The Wire. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  53. Safi, Michael (May 23, 2019). "India election results 2019: Modi claims landslide victory". The Guardian. Retrieved July 31, 2021.
  54. Ghosh, Ambar Kumar (May 19, 2019). "Decoding the Modi personality cult". QRIUS. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  55. Dhillon, Amrit (February 2, 2022). "Narendra Modi has traces of god in him, says BJP minister as personality cult grows". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460.
  56. Ray, Saptarshi (April 13, 2019). "How Narendra Modi has tried to co-opt Bollywood to push his cult of personality". The Telegraph. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  57. Tharoor, Shashi (May 28, 2019). "India's Cult of Modi". Project Syndicate. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  58. Sohini, C (February 5, 2019). "The triumph of Modi propaganda in Bollywood". South China Morning Post. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  59. Ghosh, Samrudhi (June 25, 2019). "Vivek Agnihotri: PM Narendra Modi did not even run for 7 days. This is what happens to propaganda films". India Today. Retrieved September 29, 2019.
  60. "The Führer Myth How Hitler Won Over the German People". Der Spiegel. January 30, 2008.
  61. Kershaw 1998, pp. 36–37.
  62. Kershaw 1998, p. 95.
  63. Kershaw 1998, p. 71.
  64. Speer 2009, p. 158.
  65. Kershaw 2001, p. 766.
  66. Williamson, Lucy (December 27, 2011). "Delving into North Korea's mystical cult of personality". BBC News. Archived from the original on February 2, 2013. Retrieved January 9, 2013.
  67. Choe, Yong-ho., Lee, Peter H., and de Barry, Wm. Theodore., eds. Sources of Korean Tradition, Chichester, NY: Columbia University Press, p. 419, 2000.
  68. Forer, Ben (January 12, 2012). "North Korea Reportedly Punishing Insincere Mourners". ABC News. Archived from the original on April 14, 2012. Retrieved January 9, 2013.
  69. "DPRK, Criminal Penalties". US State Dept. December 2, 2011. Archived from the original on January 1, 2013. Retrieved January 9, 2013.
  70. Armstrong, Charles K. (2013). The North Korean Revolution, 1945–1950. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. p. 222. ISBN 978-0801468797.
  71. Hunter, Helen-Louise (1999). Kim Il-song's North Korea. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 25. ISBN 978-0275962968. Archived from the original on January 11, 2014. Retrieved August 31, 2013.
  72. Root, Hilton L., Three Asian Dictators: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (January 16, 2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2716732
  73. Mark M. Turner (1990) Authoritarian rule and the dilemma of legitimacy: The case of President Marcos of the Philippines, The Pacific Review, 3:4, 349–362, DOI: 10.1080/09512749008718886
  74. Bautista Maximiano, Jose Mario (July 17, 2018). "Strongmen Hitler, Stalin, Marcos – a character study". INQUIRER.net USA. Retrieved June 28, 2021.
  75. Raymond, Walter John (1992) Dictionary of Politics: Selected American and Foreign Political and Legal Terms. ISBN 9781556180088
  76. "File No. 60: A family affair". Philstar.com. Retrieved June 28, 2021.
  77. de Ynchausti, Nik (September 23, 2016). "Why has Marcos' propaganda lived on?". Esquire Magazine Philippines. Archived from the original on September 27, 2016. Retrieved September 27, 2016.
  78. Buruma, Ian (January 16, 1986). "Who Can Redeem Mother Filipinas?". The New York Review of Books. ISSN 0028-7504. Retrieved April 4, 2021.
  79. Guerrero, Eileen (September 10, 1993). "Cults Began as Political Weapon, Ended Up Deifying Ferdinand Marcos With AM-Marcos Funeral".
  80. Kessler, Richard John (1989). Rebellion and repression in the Philippines. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300044065. OCLC 19266663.
  81. San Juan Jr., E. (1978) https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03064227808532787
  82. Lico, Gerard (2003). Edifice Complex: Power, Myth, and Marcos State Architecture. University of Hawaii Press.
  83. Navera, G.S. (2019). "Metaphorizing Martial Law: Constitutional Authoritarianism in Marcos's Rhetoric (1972–1985)". Philippine Studies. 66 (4).
  84. Romero, Jose V., Jr. (2008). Philippine political economy. Quezon City, Philippines: Central Book Supply. ISBN 9789716918892. OCLC 302100329.
  85. Curaming, Rommel A. Power and Knowledge in Southeast Asia: State and Scholars in Indonesia and the Philippines ISBN 9780429438196
  86. McCallus, J. P. (1989): "The Myths of the New Filipino: Philippine government propaganda during the Early Years of Martial Law." Philippine Quarterly of. Culture and Society 17(2): 129–48.
  87. Brinkley, Joel (January 23, 1986). "Marcos's Wartime Role Discredited in U.S. Files". The New York Times. {{cite news}}: Missing |author1= (help)
  88. "File No. 60: Debunking the Marcos war myth". Vera Files. Retrieved November 27, 2021.
  89. "The art of deception | 31 years of amnesia".
  90. Rafael, Vicente L. (April 1990). "Patronage and Pornography: Ideology and Spectatorship in the Early Marcos Years". Comparative Studies in Society and History. 32 (2): 282–304. doi:10.1017/S0010417500016492. ISSN 1475-2999. S2CID 144809573.
  91. Cimatu, Frank; Santos-Doctor, Joya (1 January 2003). "Philippines's 'Ozymandias's still haunts". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved 27 February 2015.
  92. "Philippine government faces backlash amid claims it is trying to whitewash history of late dictator Marcos". The Straits Times. September 12, 2016.
  93. Villamor, Felipe (November 8, 2016). "Philippines Can Give Hero's Burial to Ferdinand Marcos, High Court Rules". The New York Times.
  94. "A Manual for Historical Revisionists".
  95. "Martial law and historical revisionism: A holistic understanding". April 30, 2016.
  96. Tucker, Robert (1979). "The Rise of Stalin's Personality Cult" (PDF). The American Historical Review. 84 (2): 347–366. doi:10.2307/1855137. JSTOR 1855137. Archived from the original (PDF) on February 27, 2021. Retrieved February 17, 2018.
  97. Pisch, Anita (2016). The Personality Cult of Stalin in Soviet Posters, 192901953. Australia: ANU Press. pp. 87–190. ISBN 978-1760460624.
  98. Kotkin, Stephen (1995). "Review of Stalinist Terror: New Perspectives". The Russian Review. 54 (4): 635–637. doi:10.2307/131639. ISSN 0036-0341. JSTOR 131639.
  99. Gill 1980.
  100. Gunther 1936, pp. 516–517, 530–532, 534–535.
  101. "Joseph Stalin's Cult Of Personality". History Collection. March 21, 2017.
  102. Kelly 2005, pp. 206–207.
  103. Navaro-Yashin, Yael (2002). Faces of the State: Secularism and Public Life in Turkey. Princeton University Press. pp. 196–199. ISBN 0691088454.
  104. Morrison, Terry; Conaway, Wayne A. (1994). Kiss, Bow, Or Shake Hands: How to Do Business in Sixty Countries. Adams Media. p. 392. ISBN 1558504443.
  105. Yonah, Alexander (2007). Turkey: Terrorism, Civil Rights, and the European Union. Routledge. p. 137. ISBN 9780415441636.
  106. "İhbar Web". İhbar Web. Retrieved September 17, 2013.
  107. Touraj Atabaki; Erik J. Zurcher (2004). Men of Order: Authoritarian Modernization Under Atatürk and Reza Shah. I.B. Tauris. p. 4. ISBN 9781860644269. Retrieved June 21, 2013. ...and in Ataturk's case the cult of personality began early with ...
  108. M. Hakan Yavuz (2009). Secularism and Muslim Democracy in Turkey. Cambridge University Press. p. 120. ISBN 9780521888783. Retrieved June 21, 2013. In other works there is a deeply internalized notion of Ataturk as the "father" of the Turks, and all politicians are very much measured against his cult of personality.
  109. Carter V. Findley (2010). Turkey, Islam, Nationalism, and Modernity: A History, 1789–2007. Yale University Press. pp. 467–. ISBN 9780300152609. Retrieved June 21, 2013.
  110. Alexander Christie-Miller (April 20, 2013). "Lookalike keeps alive the cult of Ataturk". The Times of London.

Sources
  • Bosworth, Richard J. B. (2006). Mussolini's Italy: Life Under the Dictatorship, 1915–1945. Penguin Adult. ISBN 978-0141012919.
  • Bosworth, Richard J. B. (2014). Mussolini. A&C Black. ISBN 978-1849660242.
  • Brendon, Piers (2016). The Dark Valley. Random House. ISBN 978-1446496329.
  • Falasca-Zamponi, Simonetta (2000). Fascist Spectacle: The Aesthetics of Power in Mussolini's Italy. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0520226777.
  • Gallo, Max (1973). Mussolini's Italy; Twenty Years of the Fascist Era. Macmillan.
  • Gill, Graeme (1980). "The Soviet Leader Cult: Reflections on the Structure of Leadership in the Soviet Union". British Journal of Political Science. 10 (167): 167–186. doi:10.1017/S0007123400002088. S2CID 155049543.
  • Gundle, Stephen; Duggan, Christopher; Pieri, Giuliana (2015). The cult of the Duce: Mussolini and the Italians. Manchester University Press. ISBN 978-1526101419.
  • Gunther, John (1936). Inside Europe. Harper & brothers.
  • Hamilton, Alastair (1973). Appeal of Fascism. Harper Mass Market Paperbacks. ISBN 978-0380010257.
  • Kelly, Catriona (2005). "Riding the Magic Carpet: Children and Leader Cult in the Stalin Era". The Slavic and East European Journal. 49 (2): 199–224. doi:10.2307/20058260. JSTOR 20058260.
  • Kershaw, Ian (1998). The 'Hitler Myth'. Image and Reality in the Third Reich.
  • Kershaw, Ian (2001). Hitler 1936–1945: Nemesis. Penguin Books Limited. ISBN 978-0141925813.
  • Plamper, Jan (2012). The Stalin Cult: A Study in the Alchemy of Power. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300169522.
  • Speer, Albert (2009). Inside The Third Reich. Orion. ISBN 978-1842127353.
  • Williams, Manuela (2006). Mussolini's Propaganda Abroad: Subversion in the Mediterranean and the Middle East, 1935–1940. Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-0203004777.

Further reading
  • Apor, Balázs; Behrends, Jan C.; Jones, Polly; and Rees, E. A. (2004) eds. The Leader Cult in Communist Dictatorships: Stalin and the Eastern Bloc. London: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 1403934436.
  • Cohen, Yves (2007). "The cult of number one in an age of leaders". Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History. 8 (3): 597–634. doi:10.1353/kri.2007.0032. S2CID 144730066. Retrieved September 7, 2018.
  • Dikötter, Frank (2020). Dictators: The Cult of Personality in the Twentieth Century. London: Bloomsbury Publishing. ISBN 978-1526626981.
  • Gill, Graeme (1984). "Personality cult, political culture and party structure". Studies in Comparative Communism. 17 (2): 111–121. doi:10.1016/0039-3592(84)90008-5.
  • Melograni, Piero (1976). "The Cult of the Duce in Mussolini's Italy" (PDF). Journal of Contemporary History. 11 (4): 221–237. doi:10.1177/002200947601100411. S2CID 150787157. Retrieved September 7, 2018.
  • Morgan, Kevin (2017) International Communism and the Cult of the Individual Leaders, Tribunes and Martyrs under Lenin and Stalin. London: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1349953370
  • Paltiel, Jeremy (1983). "The Cult of Personality: Some Comparative Reflections on Political Culture in Leninist Regimes". Studies in Comparative Communism. 16 (1–2): 49–64. doi:10.1016/0039-3592(83)90043-1.
  • Petrone, Karen (2004) "Cult of Personality" in Millar, J. R. ed. Encyclopedia of Russian History. v. 1, pp. 348–350
  • Polese, Abel; Horák, Slavomir (2015). "A tale of two presidents: personality cult and symbolic nation-building in Turkmenistan". Nationalities Papers. 43 (3): 457–478. doi:10.1080/00905992.2015.1028913. S2CID 142510277.
  • Rutland, P. (2011) "Cult of Personality" i. Kurian, G. T. ed, The Encyclopedia of Political Science. Washington. D.C.: CQ Press. v. 1, p. 365
  • Vassilev, Rossen (2008) "Cult of Personality" in Darity, W. A., Jr. ed. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.