Peer Review Agenda
Scientific Information Quality – Peer Review Agenda
This site provides information on the independent peer review of documents defined by NCIPC as influential in terms of their potential impact on public policy or the private sector. NCIPC makes this information available to demonstrate its efforts to utilize only the most transparent and independent peer review, appropriate research methods, and the highest level of data quality. In addition, this information demonstrates NCIPC compliance with the specific requirements of the Information Quality Act (2000), 44 U.S.C. §3516, and of peer review standards developed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). OMB requirements, described in the Peer Review Bulletin, include making publicly available specific information on the peer review of influential documents disseminated by the federal government. OMB has defined two special categories of influential information, Influential Scientific Information (ISI) and Highly Influential Scientific Assessments (HISAs).
For issues related to the NCIPC Peer Review Agenda please contact:
Information Quality Peer Review Staff
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Office of Extramural Research 1600 Clifton Road, NE MS D-72
Atlanta, GA 30333
peer.review@cdc.gov
Peer Review Agenda Documents
Influential Scientific Information (ISI):
- Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Guideline Report (2017) [PDF 259 KB]
- Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Guideline Report (2016) [PDF 300 KB]
- Peer Review Plan for CDC Opioid Prescribing Guidelines for Chronic Pain [PDF 224 KB]
- CDC’s Response to Peer Review and Public Comments Regarding the Opioid Prescribing Guideline
Highly Influential Scientific Assessments (HISA):
- None
- Page last reviewed: June 30, 2017
- Page last updated: September 5, 2017
- Content source:
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control