|
|
|||||||||
|
Persons using assistive technology might not be able to fully access information in this file. For assistance, please send e-mail to: mmwrq@cdc.gov. Type 508 Accommodation and the title of the report in the subject line of e-mail. Epidemiologic Notes and Reports Aedes albopictus Introduction -- TexasOn August 2, 1985, the Harris County Mosquito Control District in Houston, Texas, discovered that Aedes albopictus, a mosquito of Asian origin, was established in Harris County (1); the identity of the species was confirmed by the U.S. National Museum. In a preliminary survey, A. albopictus larvae were collected at 55.8% of 163 sites inspected, suggesting the original introduction occurred some time ago. The species was most prevalent on the east side of Harris County, where the Houston Ship Channel, Ellington Field (U.S. Air Force and National Aeronautics and Space Administration), Hobby Airport, and Houston Intercontinental Airport are located. The full distribution of A. albopictus in the Houston-Galveston area is unknown because surveys were conducted only to the Harris County line. It may extend to several adjoining counties. Reported by RE Bartnett, Harris County Mosquito Control District, BL Davis, Environmental and Consumer Health Protection, Texas Dept of Health; Div of Vector-Borne Viral Diseases, Center for Infectious Diseases, CDC. Editorial NoteEditorial Note:A. albopictus is a vector for dengue (2) and other arboviral diseases of humans and is susceptible to a variety of arboviruses in the laboratory (3). A. albopictus specimens have been collected or intercepted in the contiguous United States on three previous occasions, but this is the first report that breeding populations are established in this hemisphere. In a previous report identifying A. albopictus in Memphis, Tennessee (4), the source of introduction was presumed to be cargo from international shipping. However, the Memphis collection may have originated in Houston. With the discovery of an established focus of the mosquito in Texas, it is important to determine whether the species has spread to other areas and states. In Asia, A. albopictus is primarily a woodland species that has become adapted to the urban environment. It breeds in tree holes, bamboo stumps, coconut husks, and other natural containers, as well as in tires and other discarded water-holding containers. It is not as strongly dependent on humans as A. aegypti, and it could colonize tree holes and other similar habitats in the southeastern United States. Control of this species in such natural habitats would be difficult. Competition from A. aegypti and from native tree-hole Aedes species may help retard the spread of A. albopictus (5,6). As in Hawaii (7), however, A. albopictus appears to have replaced A. aegypti. This species has apparently been established in Hawaii for a long period, but Hawaii appears to be free of dengue infections. In Asia, A. albopictus extends as far north as Beijing, China (4), and Sendai, Japan (8). This is the approximate latitude of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and Denver, Colorado, well north of the distribution of the other major dengue vector, A. aegypti. Although U.S. dengue epidemics have occurred principally in the Gulf Coast states, a major A. aegypti-transmitted dengue epidemic occurred in Philadelphia in the late 18th century (9), well north of the present distribution of A. aegypti. The efficiency of the Houston A. albopictus population in transmitting dengue is unknown. The susceptibility of native populations of this species is known to vary from 8% to 46% (10). In response to the introduction of A. albopictus, CDC has notified appropriate state, federal, and international agencies; has modified and intensified an ongoing surveillance program in the southeastern United States to determine the current distribution of A. albopictus; and is preparing training materials on the biology and taxonomy of the species. Meetings are planned to involve CDC, state directors of public health, and other key personnel in appropriate regional areas to develop surveillance and control strategies. References
Disclaimer All MMWR HTML documents published before January 1993 are electronic conversions from ASCII text into HTML. This conversion may have resulted in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users should not rely on this HTML document, but are referred to the original MMWR paper copy for the official text, figures, and tables. An original paper copy of this issue can be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office (GPO), Washington, DC 20402-9371; telephone: (202) 512-1800. Contact GPO for current prices. **Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.Page converted: 08/05/98 |
|||||||||
This page last reviewed 5/2/01
|