Vital Signs: Disparities in Antihypertensive Medication Nonadherence Among Medicare Part D Beneficiaries — United States, 2014

Introduction

Hypertension is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease (1). Use of prescribed antihypertensive medication (antihypertensives), in conjunction with diet and lifestyle modifications to lower blood pressure among persons with hypertension substantially decreases their risk for adverse cardiovascular disease outcomes (1,2). Approximately 70% of U.S. adults aged ≥65 years have hypertension, only about half of whom have their blood pressure controlled (i.e., <140/90 mm Hg) (3).

Medication nonadherence, or not following a health care professional’s instructions concerning taking prescribed antihypertensives (e.g., take one tablet twice daily), is a leading reason for poor blood pressure control among persons treated for hypertension, a strong risk factor for adverse cardiovascular disease outcomes, and a cause of excessive health care costs (2,4). The reasons for nonadherence to chronic disease medications, including antihypertensives, are numerous and complex. They include factors involving the patients, their health care professionals, and the policies and procedures of health systems and payers (5).

In 2006, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) implemented the Medicare Part D prescription drug benefit program,* a United States federal government program to subsidize the costs of prescription drugs and prescription drug insurance premiums for Medicare beneficiaries, which has increased the affordability and accessibility of prescription medications among U.S. adults aged ≥65 years and the disabled. The program has decreased out-of-pocket prescription medication spending by about $150 per year per beneficiary and increased medication use by a mean of one to three more prescriptions per year per beneficiary (6). In 2015, approximately 39 million beneficiaries were enrolled in Medicare Part D, 61% of whom were enrolled in stand-alone prescription drug plans (PDPs) that supplement Original Medicare^† coverage and 39% of whom were enrolled in Medicare Advantage^§ prescription drug (MA-PD) plans (7). The implementation of the Medicare Part D program has been associated with up to a 13.5% improvement in antihypertensive adherence among beneficiaries (8). However, antihypertensive nonadherence continues to pose a threat to this population’s health, especially among certain demographic groups (9).

This study used the most currently available data to describe antihypertensive nonadherence among Medicare Part D beneficiaries, and assessed nonadherence stratified by multiple factors, including antihypertensive class and beneficiaries’ state and county of residence, type of prescription drug plan, and treatment and demographic characteristics, to help identify and inform targeted interventions among the groups and regions most at risk.

Methods

Administrative data and prescription drug event data for all Medicare Part D beneficiaries in 2014 were accessed via the CMS Chronic Conditions Data Warehouse.^¶ Among 30.0 million beneficiaries aged ≥65 years as of January 1, 2014, 10.5 million were excluded from analysis, including 1.1 million who were long-term institutionalized residents (e.g., resided in nursing home); 0.9 million who did not have continuous enrollment in full fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare (i.e., Part A and Part B coverage within Original Medicare) with additional PDP coverage or in a MA-PD plan during January 1–December 31, 2014 or until their death in 2014; and 8.5 million who did not have at least one antihypertensive prescription filled in 2014, leaving 19.5 million beneficiaries for analysis.

Analyses were limited to beneficiaries with two or more antihypertensive prescriptions filled (fills) within the same pharmacologic therapeutic class on different service dates within a measurement period of >90 days** (N = 18.5 million). Therapeutic classes were identified using the Uniform System of Classification^†† schema and included the following: angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers, which were assessed individually and collectively with direct renin inhibitors as renin-angiotensin system antagonists; beta blockers; calcium channel blockers; diuretics; and other antihypertensives.^§§

Nonadherence was measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC) metric (10), which represents the percentage of days a beneficiary had access to the prescribed medication from the date of the first antihypertensive fill through the end of 2014 or the beneficiary’s death in 2014.^¶¶ To align with current standards, beneficiaries with a PDC <80% were considered nonadherent (10). Among beneficiaries taking multiple antihypertensives, overall PDC was calculated as an average of the PDCs calculated for each therapeutic class.*** Nonadherence was calculated by plan type, and in the FFS-PDP population, among beneficiaries with and without a diagnosis of hypertension (i.e., had or had not received an administrative billing code for hypertension^†††). Factors assessed for relationship with nonadherence were age, sex, race/ethnicity, low-income subsidy status^§§§ (which includes persons eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid), end-stage renal disease (ESRD) classification, initial entitlement eligibility designation (i.e., age ≥65 years or disability and/or ESRD), and whether any of the antihypertensives filled were for fixed-dose combinations (i.e., >1 antihypertensive within each pill). The maximum number of antihypertensive classes on hand at any one time was used as a proxy for blood pressure treatment intensity; the number of unique prescription medications used to treat any condition as a proxy for health status; the number of non-antihypertensive prescription medications filled as a proxy for overall medication burden; and the number of antihypertensive prescribers as a proxy for continuity of care for blood pressure management.^¶¶¶

Descriptive analyses included calculating the mean annual total and out-of-pocket spending on antihypertensives per beneficiary and the percentage of overall beneficiary prescription medication spending attributed to antihypertensives. For antihypertensives, mean days’ supply per fill (i.e., the mean number of days a prescription fill would last based on the amount of medication supplied), percentage of fills with generic rather than brand-name medications, and the percentage of fills with fixed-dose combinations were calculated. Nonadherence was stratified by beneficiaries’ U.S. Census Region and state or territory of residence and mapped by county of residence using a spatial empirical Bayesian smoothing technique to enhance estimate stability. The data used in these analyses represent 100% of the beneficiaries who met the inclusion criteria; therefore, no statistical testing was needed to assess for differences among subgroups for the previously described variables.

Results

Among the 18.5 million Medicare Part D beneficiaries who were prescribed antihypertensives, 4.9 million (26.3%) were nonadherent ( Table 1). Nonadherence varied by race (24.3% [whites], 26.3% [Asian/Pacific Islanders], 33.8% [Hispanics], 35.7% [blacks], 38.8% [American Indians/Alaska Natives]); low-income subsidy status (32.1% [low-income subsidy], 25.4% [no subsidy]); and reason for initial entitlement, which was highest (42.4%) among beneficiaries with disability and ESRD.

Nonadherence was slightly higher among older age groups and when a second class of antihypertensive was added (27.2%) compared with a single class (23.2%), and was slightly lower among beneficiaries with any fixed-dose combination medication use (Table 1). Nonadherence increased with decreases in health status and as the number of antihypertensive prescribers increased. There was little relationship between the overall medication burden proxy or plan type (FFS-PDP versus MA-PD) and nonadherence. Nonadherence differed by medication class, ranging from 16.9% (angiotensin II receptor blockers) to 28.9% (diuretics); 20.4% of beneficiaries who were prescribed renin-angiotensin system antagonists, the medication category used in the CMS Part C and D Star Ratings Program,**** were nonadherent ( Table 2).

At the state level, beneficiaries in North Dakota (18.7%), Wisconsin (18.8%), and Minnesota (18.9%) had the lowest nonadherence, and beneficiaries in Washington, D.C. (33.7%), Mississippi (32.8%), and Louisiana (31.5%) had the highest ( Table 3; Supplemental Figure 1 [https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/40807]). Nonadherence was higher in the U.S. territories of Puerto Rico (39.6%) and the Virgin Islands (46.9%) than within the states (range: 18.7%–33.7%). At the county level, considerable variation in nonadherence was found (range: 15.9% to 56.2%). The greatest nonadherence tended to occur in the southern United States (nonadherence, by U.S. Census region, of 28.9% for the South, 26.7% for the West, 24.1% for the Northeast, and 22.8% for the Midwest) ( Figure).

In 2014, the 215.9 million antihypertensive fills accounted for almost $5.9 billion in total spending, of which $2.1 billion (35.6%) was borne by beneficiaries (Table 1). On average, per-person out-of-pocket spending for antihypertensives was about $92 per year, reflecting 18.4% of beneficiaries’ overall annual prescription medication spending. Total annual spending on antihypertensives differed by beneficiary characteristics (Table 1), medication class (Table 2), and beneficiary state of residence (Table 3). The highest mean annual total spending occurred among beneficiaries using a maximum of four or more antihypertensive classes at one time ($693 per year), using angiotensin II receptor blockers ($476 spending per year on that class alone), and living in New Jersey ($472 per year). Overall, 95.5% of antihypertensive fills were for generic formulations. Fixed-dose combination fills accounted for 8.9% of antihypertensive fills (Table 1), with thiazide diuretics, a specific type of diuretic, being the antihypertensive most often prescribed in combination (46.5% of fills) (Table 2). Mean days’ supply per fill was 53.9 days and varied by beneficiary characteristics (Table 1), including state of residence (Table 3).

Conclusions and Comments

More than one fourth of Medicare Part D beneficiaries aged ≥65 years were nonadherent to their antihypertensive regimen. Uncontrolled blood pressure is a main risk factor for the first and third leading causes of death (heart disease and stroke, respectively) among adults aged ≥65 years (1).^†††† Although multiple factors contribute to the high proportion of uncontrolled blood pressure among persons in this age group (11), persons who are adherent to their antihypertensives are 45% more likely to achieve blood pressure control and have up to a 38% decreased risk for having a cardiovascular event compared with persons who are nonadherent (2,4).

Several groups had higher antihypertensive nonadherence, including blacks and American Indians/Alaska Natives, who are also at higher risk for poor blood pressure control and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality compared with other racial and ethnic groups (1). Moreover, beneficiaries living in the southern United States had the highest nonadherence. These differences in nonadherence could play a role in persistent disparities in blood pressure control and cardiovascular disease outcomes in these groups and regions (1,12). Although still suboptimal, if the average nonadherence rate of 18.9% among Medicare Part D beneficiary populations in the three states with the lowest nonadherence rates (North Dakota, Wisconsin, and Minnesota) were to be achieved in all states, the national nonadherence rate would decrease by about one third, and 1.4 million more beneficiaries would be taking their antihypertensives as directed.

Factors and opportunities have been identified that prescribers, health systems, and payers can address to improve medication adherence. For older adults, who are often taking multiple chronic disease medications (13), including 72% of beneficiaries in this study taking two or more antihypertensives, an important factor in improving adherence is simplification of the antihypertensive regimen. Some strategies include decreasing pill count through the use of fixed-dose combination medications (14,15), which were underused among most beneficiary groups in this study; limiting the number of pharmacy visits needed by increasing the days’ supply per fill (e.g., prescribing 90-day versus 30-day allotments), which had wide variability among beneficiary groups, and synchronizing fills for all medication (14); and using reminder devices and technology aids that encourage patients to follow their recommended medication schedule (16). These strategies can be implemented by health care teams that are using standardized hypertension treatment approaches to manage patients’ blood pressure (15). These teams might include physicians and physician assistants, nurses and nurse practitioners, pharmacists, and community health workers, and their collective work can help ensure patients’ medication regimens and adherence are regularly assessed and their blood pressure controlled. Coordinated care might help overcome the finding of increased nonadherence when patients have more prescribers managing their antihypertensive regimens.

Additional interventions to improve adherence include engaging patients in medication regimen decision making using motivational counseling techniques and educating patients about the risks associated with uncontrolled blood pressure (17); encouraging the use of home blood pressure monitoring (18); maximizing use of generic medication (19); leveraging health information technologies that allow for e-prescribing, additional patient engagement, and clinical-decision support that informs prescribing decisions (15,16); and implementing payment reforms that decrease spending, such as limiting deductibles and copayments (20). Although annual out-of-pocket antihypertensive spending for most beneficiaries was low (around $100 per year), it represented almost one fifth of their total prescription medication spending and might be a barrier to adherence among certain groups.

CMS has taken steps to decrease cost-sharing in the Medicare Part D coverage gap (i.e., ‘donut hole’, where beneficiaries who meet a specific spending threshold are responsible for a higher percentage of prescription medication spending) (21), which could reduce nonadherence. In addition, CMS has included medication adherence measures as part of the Part C and D Star Ratings Program to encourage health plans that participate in Medicare Part D to support improved adherence for specific medications, including antihypertensives. Plans achieve this through using interventions such as medication therapy management programs to review beneficiaries’ medication regimens and follow up with those who are nonadherent.

The findings in this report are subject to at least six limitations. First, PDC assesses only the availability of medication and not the actual taking of medication. However, use of measures, like PDC, which rely on administrative data to assess nonadherence have typically correlated well with self-reported nonadherence, plasma medication levels, physiologic markers, and cardiovascular disease outcomes (2,22), and might better assess nonadherence among older adults than self-reported or other objective measures (22). Second, because the PDC calculation excludes patients with only one antihypertensive fill and does not include persons who are prescribed medication but never initiate treatment, it probably underestimates nonadherence. Approximately 300,000 beneficiaries in this study had only one filled prescription within a class; in general, up to one fourth of prescriptions for newly prescribed antihypertensives are never filled (23). Third, nonadherence might be overestimated among beneficiaries who switched antihypertensive classes based on their clinician’s recommendation (e.g., because of side effects) or sometimes directly purchased low-priced generic antihypertensives without involvement of their prescription drug plan, but were considered nonadherent. Fourth, periods when beneficiaries were hospitalized were not censored because hospitalization data were not available for beneficiaries with MA-PD plans; however, the effect of this on nonadherence rates is small based on earlier research and guidance (10). Fifth, proxy measures used here might not accurately reflect their intended purpose. For example, a higher number of antihypertensive prescribers per patient might indicate better team-based care rather than splintered care, and methodologies accounting for these increasingly popular models of care should be considered in future analyses. Finally, subpopulation comparisons were not adjusted for other factors and should be addressed in future studies.

More than one fourth of Medicare Part D beneficiaries assessed were nonadherent to their antihypertensive therapy. This was the first study to identify considerable geographic variation in antihypertensive nonadherence at the county level. Although recognized as challenging, improving adherence to antihypertensives is an effective way to improve blood pressure control and reduce cardiovascular events in this population, which is already at high risk for having cardiovascular disease. This study identified multiple groups at increased risk for nonadherence and potentially modifiable risk factors. Strategies to improve adherence range from individual patient engagement and intervention to systematic health system changes, and coordinated approaches are important to improving adherence and the cardiovascular health of this population.