Figure K. Intermediate Resistance and Resistance to Ciprofloxacin Among GISP Isolates, 1990-2008

This web page is archived for historical purposes and is no longer being updated. Newer data is available on the STD Data and Statistics page.

CLINIC		% of isolates
CLINIC		1990	1991	1992	1993	1994	1995	1996	1997	1998	1999	2000	2001	2002	2003	2004	2005	2006	2007	2008
ALBUQUERQUE	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.3	16.7	6.9
ALBUQUERQUE	Intermediate Resistance	.	0.7	.	.	.	0.6	1.2	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.7	.	.	2.0
ATLANTA	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.9	3.8	5.7	2.6	10.3
ATLANTA	Intermediate Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	4.8	5.3	1.5	0.5	0.4	.	.	.	.	.	.
BALTIMORE	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.3	1.0	3.0	1.4	2.0	5.4
BALTIMORE	Intermediate Resistance	.	.	.	.	0.4	.	.	.	0.5	.	.	.	0.3	.	.	.	0.7	.	.
BIRMINGHAM	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.1	9.4	8.3
BIRMINGHAM	Intermediate Resistance	.	.	.	2.1	0.8	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.3	0.3	.	.	.
CHICAGO	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.1	2.3	4.7	4.1	8.6	5.3
CHICAGO	Intermediate Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.4	.	.	0.5	.	2.1	2.8	3.0	3.9	3.7	2.2	1.9
CINCINNATI	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.4	0.4	.	.	0.4	0.4	0.3	1.0	0.7	1.2	2.2
CINCINNATI	Intermediate Resistance	.	0.4	.	.	.	.	.	1.6	3.0	9.0	9.5	7.2	5.0	1.5	0.7	0.3	.	.	.
CLEVELAND	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.3	0.4	2.8	3.1	0.7	4.1
CLEVELAND	Intermediate Resistance	.	2.5	5.4	6.3	17.5	13.7	5.4	5.6	5.8	1.7	0.8	.	0.4	0.3	2.7	8.1	4.1	5.6	0.8
DALLAS	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.0	3.2	6.1	7.5	7.1
	Intermediate Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.4	.	.	.	0.3	1.4	0.7	.	.
DENVER	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	0.4	.	.	.	0.3	.	0.3	.	0.7	8.3	10.9	15.7	17.0	10.7
DENVER	Intermediate Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.3	.	.	.	.	1.2
DETROIT	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.3	0.3	1.7	1.0
GREENSBORO	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.8	0.6	1.7	5.3	3.6
GREENSBORO	Intermediate Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.1	.	.	.
HONOLULU	Resistance	.	0.9	.	1.2	1.4	3.3	.	2.4	3.9	14.3	14.3	20.3	11.7	13.3	22.8	19.3	35.8	28.6	40.5
HONOLULU	Intermediate Resistance	5.2	2.7	3.8	2.4	4.1	1.6	3.9	7.1	3.9	2.0	4.8	3.8	4.3	5.8	.	1.1	1.1	1.4	.
KANSAS CITY	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16.4	7.5
KANSAS CITY	Intermediate Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.8	0.4
LAS VEGAS	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.4	2.4	5.4	8.7	18.7	17.7
LAS VEGAS	Intermediate Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.3	.	0.7	1.0	1.3	1.7
LOS ANGELES	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.4	13.8	14.5	22.7	22.4	16.8
LOS ANGELES	Intermediate Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	0.4	.	.	1.2	.
MIAMI	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.4	2.0	6.8	9.1	19.8	19.5	16.2
MIAMI	Intermediate Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	.	0.4	1.7	1.6	1.0	0.8	0.9	1.5	0.4
MINNEAPOLIS	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	2.3	9.3	8.0	5.7	10.7	7.6
MINNEAPOLIS	Intermediate Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.3	0.3	.	.	.	0.8	.	0.4	.	.
NEW ORLEANS	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.4	0.4	.	.	0.4	1.5	6.3	10.2	18.1	14.9
NEW ORLEANS	Intermediate Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.6	0.5	0.4	.	0.8	.	.	.	.	.	0.4	.
NEW YORK CITY	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	14.9	15.4
NEW YORK CITY	Intermediate Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.1	4.1
OKLAHOMA CITY	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.3	2.3	4.3	6.0	4.4
ORANGE COUNTY	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.8	5.6	2.3	11.4	31.5	20.5	27.5	34.6	41.0	33.3
ORANGE COUNTY	Intermediate Resistance	.	.	.	.	0.5	1.4	0.7	.	.	.	.	1.6	0.6	0.6	1.9	1.7	0.8	.	.
PHILADELPHIA	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.3	3.3	14.3	30.3	29.1	20.6
PHILADELPHIA	Intermediate Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.4	.	0.4	0.3	0.3	.	0.3	0.3	.	.	.	.
PHOENIX	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.3	2.6	6.6	7.1	11.9	8.7	16.5
PHOENIX	Intermediate Resistance	.	.	.	.	0.4	0.8	0.4	.	.	1.4	3.4	2.1	.	0.4	0.3	0.4	0.4	.	.
PORTLAND	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	.	.	.	.	1.7	3.0	11.5	23.1	27.2	28.6	51.6
PORTLAND	Intermediate Resistance	0.4	.	0.4	1.7	2.5	.	0.9	.	.	0.7	2.0	2.1	2.6	3.0	0.5	.	1.8	.	.
RICHMOND	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.9	21.8
SAN DIEGO	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.9	.	1.0	0.4	2.1	16.5	13.2	20.6	26.2	35.1	36.3	29.1
SAN DIEGO	Intermediate Resistance	.	0.9	1.9	0.9	0.8	0.8	.	.	.	0.5	0.4	1.7	1.2	1.6	0.8	0.7	1.5	1.6	.
SAN FRANCISCO	Resistance	.	.	.	.	0.4	0.4	.	.	0.4	0.3	0.3	3.4	6.7	19.2	24.3	31.3	44.5	31.3	26.1
SAN FRANCISCO	Intermediate Resistance	.	0.4	0.4	0.8	0.8	0.8	0.4	0.4	0.4	1.0	9.9	17.2	9.9	3.6	4.0	3.0	.	.	0.5
SEATTLE	Resistance	.	.	.	.	.	1.7	1.2	.	.	1.2	0.9	.	3.0	7.0	16.2	11.6	31.8	29.3	31.3
SEATTLE	Intermediate Resistance	.	.	.	0.4	1.0	.	.	.	0.6	0.6	2.3	2.8	3.7	3.5	3.4	0.4	13.2	19.1	14.1

File Formats Help:

How do I view different file formats (PDF, DOC, PPT, MPEG) on this site?

Page last reviewed: May 17, 2010 (archived document)
Content source:
- Division of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention