1991 Indianapolis mayoral election

Primaries were held in May.[2]

On education, Goldsmith was a supporter of school choice, increased parental involvement in education, and an opponent of court ordered desegregation busing.[2] Mahern similarly supported school choice and argued for the need to reestablish neighborhood schools.[2]

Both candidates supported completing the construction of the Circle Centre mall.[2] Goldsmith, however, promised not to spend any more public funds on it.[2]

On crime, both candidates supported community policing.[2] Mahern supported implementing a waiting period for the purchase of guns.[2]

Both candidates argued that the city needed to undertake infrastructure improvements.[2] Both candidates opposed raising property taxes to fund such improvements.[2] Mahern was supportive of an increase in the city's sewer tax, and sought to create a commuter tax. [2] Goldsmith was open to increasing user fees to pay for infrastructure expenditures.[2] The two candidates disagreed on the expense of infrastructure demands. Mahern endorsed the Indianapolis Chamber of Commerce's report on infrastructure, while Goldsmith contended that between $100 and 200 million could be cut from the report's $1.1 billion cost estimate.[2] Both candidates proposed selling municipal assets in order to raise funds.[2]

Less than half of the city's 417,000 eligible voters participated in the election.[2]

Mahern lost a significant share of the traditionally-Democratic Catholic vote, which some experts attributed to his stance on abortion.[2] Mahern received strong support from African American voters.[2] Goldsmith overwhelming won the city's outlying, primarily white, precincts.[2]