Constitution of Australia

The Constitution of Australia is the supreme law of Australia. It is a written constitution that sets down the political structure of Australia as a federation under a constitutional monarchy and outlines the structure and powers of the Australian Government's three constituent parts: the executive, legislature, and judiciary.

Commonwealth of Australia Constitution
Overview
JurisdictionAustralia
Date effective1 January 1901 (1901-01-01)
SystemFederal Government
Government structure
Branches
Chambers
Executive
JudiciaryHigh Court of Australia and other federal courts the Parliament creates — See Judiciary of Australia
History
Amendments8 — See Referendums in Australia
Last amended1977 — See 1977 Australian referendum
CitationConstitution of the Commonwealth of Australia
LocationNational Archives of Australia
Author(s)Constitutional Conventions, 1891 and 1897–98
SupersedesFederal Council of Australasia Act 1885 (Imp)
Full text
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act at Wikisource
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
Act of Parliament
Long titleAn Act to constitute the Commonwealth of Australia
Citation63 & 64 Vict, c 12
Dates
Royal assent9 July 1900
Other legislation
Repeals/revokesFederal Council of Australasia Act 1885 (Imp)
Amended by Note: Only the Australian version of the Constitution has been amended
Relates to
Status: Amended
Records of Parliamentary debate relating to the statute from Hansard
Text of statute as originally enacted
Revised text of statute as amended

The Constitution was drafted between 1891 and 1898 through a series of conventions conducted by representatives of the six self-governing British colonies in Australia: New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria and Western Australia. The final draft was then approved in a set of referendums from 1898 to 1900. The British Government objected to some elements of the final draft, but a slightly modified form was enacted as section 9 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900, an act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, and given royal assent on 9 July 1900.[1][2] This act, also known as the covering act, also authorised the Queen to proclaim the actual act of federation, which was done by Queen Victoria on 17 September 1900, to take effect on 1 January 1901.[3][4] After this, the six colonies became states within the new federation.

The High Court of Australia is responsible for the interpretation of the constitution, their decisions forming the basis of Australian constitutional law. As well as its textual provisions, the Constitution is understood to incorporate various unwritten constitutional conventions and ideas derived from the Westminster system, one of which is responsible government. Although the Constitution initially derived its legal authority by virtue of the passage of the 1900 act under the authority of the UK Parliament, the present understanding of the High Court and some academics is that the Constitution now derives its legal authority from the Australian people.[5] Other documents of constitutional significance to Australia include the Statute of Westminster and the Australia Act 1986.

The document may only be amended by referendum, through the procedure set out in section 128. This requires a double majority – a nationwide majority as well as a majority of voters in a majority of states. Only eight of the 45 proposed amendments put to a referendum have passed.[6][7] Proposals to amend the document to recognise Indigenous Australians and to become a republic are the subject of significant contemporary debate. A referendum to establish an Indigenous Voice to Parliament was voted down on 14 October 2023.[8]

History

Prior to Federation

Political movements to federate the Australian colonies grew to prominence in the mid 19th century. Multiple motivations existed for increased political co-operation between the colonies; including a desire to regulate inter-colonial tariffs.

Tensions existed, however, between the larger colonies and the smaller ones, and in the degree to which each colony embraced protectionist policies. Those tensions and the outbreak of the American Civil War harmed the political case for federalism in the 1850s and 1860s.

In 1889 the Federal Council of Australasia was established. It arose out of a fear of the growing presence of German and French colonies in the Pacific, and a growing Australian identity. The council could legislate on certain subjects but did not have a permanent secretariat, an executive, or independent source of revenue. Perhaps most problematically New South Wales, the largest colony, did not join the body.

A series of conferences to discuss federalism was promoted by the Premier of New South Wales Henry Parkes; the first held in 1890 at Melbourne, and another at Sydney in 1891. These conferences were attended by most colonial leaders.

By the 1891 conference the federalist cause gained momentum. Discussion turned to what the proper system of federal government ought to be. A draft constitution was drawn up at the conference under the guidance of Sir Samuel Griffith, but these meetings lacked popular support. An additional problem was that this draft constitution sidestepped some critical issues like tariff policy. The 1891 draft was submitted to colonial parliaments; however, it lapsed in New South Wales. After that event other colonies were unwilling to proceed.

In 1895, the six premiers of the Australian colonies agreed to establish a new Convention by popular vote. The Convention met over the course of a year from 1897 to 1898. The meetings produced a new draft which contained substantially the same principles of government as the 1891 draft, but with added provisions for responsible government.

Some delegates to the 1898 Constitutional Convention favoured a section similar to the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution, but this was decided against. This remains the case, with the Constitution only protecting a small and limited number of constitutional rights.

To ensure popular support, the 1898 draft was presented to the electors of each colony. After one failed attempt, an amended draft was submitted to the electors of each colony except Western Australia. After ratification by the five colonies, the Bill was presented to the British Imperial Parliament with an Address requesting Queen Victoria to enact the Bill.

Prior to the Bill's enactment, a final change was made after lobbying by the colonial Chief Justices. This change established a right to appeal from the High Court to the UK Judicial Committee of the Privy Council. After the change, the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act was passed by the British Parliament in 1900. Western Australia then agreed to join the Commonwealth to ensure it would be an "original state". The Commonwealth of Australia was then officially established on 1 January 1901.

After federation

Royal Assent to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act

At federation, six British colonies became a single federated nation. Some British Imperial laws remained in force, together with those of the Australian legislatures; although, according to Robert Menzies, "the real and administrative legislative independence of Australia" was never challenged since federation.[9]

The formal power of the British Imperial Parliament to legislate with effect in Australia was restricted by the UK's passage in 1931 of the Statute of Westminster, adopted into Australian law by the Statute of Westminster Adoption Act 1942. The adoption act acceded Australia to the Statute of Westminster retroactively, with the date set to 3 September 1939, when Australia along with the rest of the British Empire entered World War II.

Photo of the Australia Act 1986 (United Kingdom) document located in Parliament House, Canberra

Australia arguably did not achieve full, de jure independence from the UK until 1986, with the passage of the Australia Act. That act formally ended the UK parliament's ability to legislate over Australian states, and also abolished all appeals from Australian courts to the UK Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.

In 1988, the original copy of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 from the Public Record Office in London was lent to Australia for the purposes of the Australian Bicentenary. The Australian Government requested permission to keep the copy, and the British Parliament agreed by passing the Australian Constitution (Public Record Copy) Act 1990. The copy was given to the National Archives of Australia.[10]

A curiosity of the document's history is that the act remains in force as a statute of the UK in its original form,[11] while in Australia it has force with the constitutional amendments made by referendum (its preamble and the covering clauses have never been amended).[12] Australian High Court Justices have discussed in obiter that the Constitution's source of lawful authority may no longer reside in the Imperial Parliament, but may instead now derive its lawful authority from the Australian people.[13][14][15]

Following the 2017–18 Australian parliamentary eligibility crisis, there was discussion of whether to retain or replace the current constitution.[16][17] Former prime minister Bob Hawke advocated for getting "rid of the constitution we've got", and replacing the Constitution with a system that does not include states.[18]

Commemoration

Constitution Day is observed on 9 July, the date Queen Victoria assented to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act in 1900.[19] The date is not a public holiday.

Constitution Day was first held on 9 July 2000 to mark the centenary of the Constitution in the lead up to the Centenary of Federation.

Further events have not been widely held since 2001. The day was revived in 2007 and is jointly organised by the National Archives and the Department of Immigration and Citizenship.[20]

Document structure and text

The constitution as amended

Covering clauses

The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (Imp) was granted royal assent on 9 July 1900. It consists of nine sections.

Section 9 contains the Constitution itself. Since the Constitution itself is divided into "sections", sections 1 to 8 of the Act have come to be known for convenience as the "covering clauses". The second covering clause is interpretive, specifying that throughout the Act references to "the Queen" are (in effect) references to whoever is the monarch in the UK.

In this period, "the Crown" was considered to be the same entity everywhere in the British Empire. Although that is no longer assumed, the rules of succession remain almost unchanged.

Preamble

The Constitution Act contains a preamble. It does not discuss Western Australia due to the late date which it agreed to join Federation. The preamble names all states except Western Australia, mentions the Christian God and recognises the British Crown's authority.

WHEREAS the people of New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Queensland, and Tasmania, humbly relying on the blessing of

Almighty God, have agreed to unite in one indissoluble Federal Commonwealth under the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain

and Ireland, and under the Constitution hereby established:

And whereas it is expedient to provide for the admission into the Commonwealth of other Australasian Colonies and possessions of the Queen:

Be it therefore enacted by the Queen's most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament

assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:[21]

Main document

The Constitution is divided into eight chapters, collectively containing 128 sections. The first three chapters state the respective powers of the legislature, executive, and judiciary. This split into three chapters has been interpreted by the High Court as giving rise to a substantive separation of powers doctrine in Australia.[22]

Chapter I: The Parliament

Chapter I: The Parliament sets up the legislative branch of government. Its constituent parts are stated to be the Sovereign (represented by the Governor-General), the Senate, and the House of Representatives. It provides for the number of representatives to attend each body, and provides that the representatives attending both must be chosen directly by the electorate.

Each electorate of the house of representatives is to be apportioned equally by population, whereas senators are allocated unevenly between "original states", the territories, and future states (of which none presently exist). The house of representatives is required to have twice as many members as the senate. Chapter I also defines the role of the monarch in relation to the legislature, although the monarch's own powers over legislation are now regarded as defunct.

The chapter notably also provides for the powers of the Commonwealth parliament. The Parliament is not granted plenary power by the Constitution. Section 51 contains a list of enumerated topics that the Commonwealth Parliament is permitted to legislate upon. States may also legislate upon these topics, but Commonwealth law prevails in the event of inconsistency between the laws. Section 52 contains a brief list of topics that only the Commonwealth may legislate upon.

Some relevant powers of the Governor-General are provided here: to summon, prorogue or dissolve the Federal Parliament, and to give or refuse royal assent to federal bills.

Other matters dealt within the chapter include eligibility issues for voting or standing in elections; and miscellaneous matters regarding parliamentary procedures and allowances.

Chapter II: The Executive Government

Chapter II: The Executive Government sets up the executive branch. Executive power is stated to be exercised by the Governor-General, who appoints a Federal Executive Council and is to act "with" its advice. The Governor-General is empowered to appoint and dismiss ministers, and is the ceremonial Commander-in-Chief of the Australian armed forces. This colonial model differs substantially from the reality, which since Federation has followed constitutional convention drawn from the United Kingdom. By convention, almost all executive authority is exercised by a prime minister and a cabinet..

Chapter III: The Judicature

Chapter III establishes the High Court as Australia's apex court

Chapter III: The Judicature sets up the judicial branch. Commonwealth judicial power is vested in a federal supreme court to be called the High Court of Australia. The Parliament is authorised to create federal courts, and to vest the exercise of federal judicial power within the courts of the states. Section 74 (now defunct) provides for the circumstances in which an appeal may be made to the Queen in Council, section 75 provides for the High Court's jurisdiction, and section 80 guarantees trial by jury for indictable offences against the Commonwealth.

Chapter IV: Finance and Trade

Chapter IV: Finance and Trade deals with commercial matters within the federation. Section 81 prescribes all Commonwealth revenue to a Consolidated Revenue Fund, and s90 gives the Commonwealth exclusive power over custom and excise duties. Section 92 is notable for prescribing "absolutely free" trade and commerce between the states. Section 96 allows the Commonwealth to make grants on terms determined by Parliament. Section 101 sets up an Inter-State Commission, now defunct.

Chapter V: The States

Chapter V: The States contains provisions dealing with the states and their role in the federal system. Sections 106–108 preserve the powers of the states, section 109 provides that Commonwealth legislation prevails over that of a state to the extent of any inconsistency. Section 111 provides for surrender of state territory to the Commonwealth, section 114 forbids states to raise military forces without Commonwealth permission, and also forbids the Commonwealth to tax property of a state government and the reverse. Section 116 forbids the Commonwealth to establish a national religion, to impose any religious observance or prohibit the free exercise of any religion, or to impose a religious test for office.

Chapter VI: New States

Chapter VI: New States allows for the establishment or admission of new states, and allows Parliament to provide for representation of the territories. It also provides that state boundaries must require the consent of a state before alteration by referendum.

Chapter VII: Miscellaneous

Chapter VII: Miscellaneous contains provisions on varied topics. Section 125 establishes Melbourne as the nation's temporary capital, while providing for the eventual capital to be established within New South Wales but no less than one hundred miles (160 km) from Sydney. In 1911 New South Wales ceded to the Commonwealth what is now the Australian Capital Territory. Canberra, built within it, was declared the national capital in 1913. Section 126 permits the Governor-General to appoint deputies. Section 127 provided that "aboriginal natives" were not to be included in headcounts for electoral purposes. That section was removed by referendum in 1967.[23]

Chapter VIII: Alteration of the Constitution

Chapter VIII: Alteration of the Constitution is a single section providing for amendments. It prescribes that alterations may only occur through a referendum bill being approved at a national referendum. A national referendum under this section requires a double majority to be valid, which consists of a majority return of electors nationally, and a majority return in a majority of states.

Schedule

The Constitution also contains a schedule setting out the wording of the oath and affirmation of allegiance.[24] By convention, the Governor-General and members of parliament are required to swear an oath or affirmation of allegiance before taking office.

The oath reads[note 1]:

I, (name), do swear that I will well and truly serve His Majesty King Charles the Third, His heirs and successors according to law, in the office of Governor-General of the Commonwealth of Australia, and I will do right to all manner of people after the laws and usages of the Commonwealth of Australia, without fear or favour, affection or ill will. So help me God![25]

By convention the oath or affirmation of office made by a prime minister, ministers and parliamentary secretaries when entering office is not that contained within this schedule. Rather, it is determined by the prime minister of the day, and administered to them by the Governor-General. This convention has been in place since 1901.[26]

Unwritten conventions

Constitutional conventions are an important part of the Australian Constitution. Despite being unwritten, they are understood by the High Court to be incorporated within the document. The conventions primarily derive from the unwritten parliamentary conventions within the Westminster system of responsible government. Some notable conventions include the existence of the Prime Minister of Australia as head of Cabinet in Council. Another is that the Governor-General, by convention, acts on the advice of the Prime Minister.

Advice to the Governor-General is given by the Prime Minister and, also by convention, the Prime Minister's advice is ordinarily to be followed. There may, however, be circumstances in which a Governor-General has to act, or may choose to act, without or against prime ministerial advice. These include a situation where, following a general election, no party has an overall majority in the House of Representatives, so that the Governor-General has to choose a prime minister without a prime minister to give advice. Such discretions are known as the Governor-General's "reserve powers",[note 2] but it is uncertain what they include and it remains highly controversial that in 1975 a governor-general dismissed a prime minister who, in the Governor-General's opinion, was unable to obtain supply.[27][28]

Unwritten conventions during the dismissal

The nature of constitutional conventions gave rise to controversy during the dismissal of the Whitlam government in 1975. In that episode, the Governor-General Sir John Kerr dismissed the Labor Prime Minister Gough Whitlam, and appointed the Liberal Opposition leader Malcolm Fraser as caretaker Prime Minister on the understanding that he would immediately call an election (which he then won). This crisis arose due to the breach of the convention that, in the event of a Senate vacancy, the state government would nominate a replacement from the same political party. This convention was broken by the Lewis government of New South Wales.[29] Notably, this unwritten convention was later formally incorporated into the written constitution via national referendum in 1977.[30] Additionally, the Governor-General Sir John Kerr argued that Gough Whitlam had broken an alleged convention that a prime minister who cannot obtain supply must either request that the Governor-General call a general election, or resign.[31] This view remains controversial, with no consensus amongst legal experts as to whether this convention exists.[32] While the convention that a prime minister must have the confidence of the House of Representatives to govern is accepted as a principle of responsible government, whether this convention extends to requiring the confidence of the Senate to pass supply remains subject to often partisan debate.[32]

Interpretation

The High Court is responsible for interpreting the Constitution. The legal doctrines historically applied by the court its process have varied. Some such doctrines have included the separation of powers, intergovernmental immunities, and reserved state powers.

While the document does not include a bill of rights, some rights and/or restrictions are expressly stated. Among these are the section 80 right to trial by jury for indictable offences, the section 51(xxxi) right to just compensation, and the section 117 right against discrimination based on state residence. Section 116, which limits Commonwealth legislative power concerning religion, indirectly provides individuals with rights of religious observance and other exercise of religion, and freedom from religious tests for office.

The High Court has also read a number of important legal implications into the document. One of these is the freedom of political communication, the other is a freedom of interference from voting in elections. Both doctrines are born of the section 7 and section 24 requirements that representatives in Australia's houses of parliament be "directly chosen by the people".[33][34] These implications, which limit Commonwealth legislative power, have been characterised as "freedoms" or "guarantees" by members of the High Court, and the Court has been wary of describing them as "implied rights" or "implied constitutional rights".[35] Adrienne Stone has argued that the High Court's purported distinction between a "right" versus a "freedom" is misleading and/or little more than semantic, but it is still used by the court.[35]

Alterations to the Constitution

Historical referendums and amendments

Amendment to the Constitution requires a referendum in which the amending act is approved by a majority in at least four states, as well as a nationwide majority: a double majority. This reflects the commitment to federalism within the constitution, to ensure that any changes to the document cannot be approved solely with the support of the more populous states.[36]

Forty-five proposals to amend the Constitution have been voted on at referendums, only eight of which have been approved. The eight proposals that have been approved are:

  • 1906Senate Elections  amended section 13 to slightly alter the length and dates of senators' terms of office.
  • 1910State Debts  amended section 105 to extend the power of the Commonwealth to take over pre-existing state debts, to debts incurred by a state at any time.
  • 1928State Debts  inserted section 105A to ensure the constitutional validity of the financial agreement reached between the Commonwealth and state governments in 1927.
  • 1946Social Services  inserted section 51 (xxiiiA) to extend the power of the Commonwealth over a range of social services.
  • 1967Aboriginal Australians  amended section 51 (xxvi) to extend the powers of the Commonwealth to Indigenous Australians in states; repealed section 127 preventing the inclusion of all Indigenous Australians in population counts for constitutional purposes.
  • 1977 – Three amendments: First to ensure Senate casual vacancies be filled by a member of the same political party; Second to allow residents of Australian territories to vote in referendums; Third to mandate a retirement age of 70 for judges in federal courts.

This low success rate reflects a reluctance of Australian voters to approve changes, rather than the onerous requirements of section 128; only 3 of the 36 failed referenda received a national majority of votes without a majority of states.[37] All but one of the successful referenda also received a majority in each of the states, with exception of the 1910 State Debts referendum which succeeded despite a no vote of 66% in New South Wales.[38]

Proposals for amendment via British legislation

In the first decades after Federation, before Australia's constitutional relationship with the United Kingdom had been clarified, two serious attempts were made to amend the constitution via a British act of Parliament, in order to circumvent the referendum provisions of section 128:

  • In 1917, during World War I, Prime Minister Billy Hughes sought to amend the Constitution to allow for the constitutionally required federal election to be postponed, thereby extending the term of his government.[39] The House of Representatives passed a motion by 34 votes to 17 calling on the British Parliament to amend the Constitution Act; Hughes had already secured the support of the British Government for his tactic. However, the equivalent motion in the Senate was defeated after Nationalist senators Thomas Bakhap and John Keating crossed the floor. Hughes then called the 1917 federal election, which saw his government re-elected.[40]
  • In 1934, the Western Australia Government petitioned the British Parliament to amend the Constitution Act to allow it to withdraw from the Federation. This followed a 1933 referendum in which the state voted to secede from the rest of Australia, the results of which were rejected by the Federal Government. The petition, presented by former premier Hal Colebatch, was heard by a joint select committee of the House of Commons and House of Lords, which rejected it on the grounds that it broke the principle of non-interference in Dominion matters recently codified in the Statute of Westminster 1931.[41]

Existing major amendment proposals

Multiple ongoing debates exist regarding changes to the Australian Constitution. These include debates on the inclusion of a preamble, proposals for an Australian republic, and formal recognition of Indigenous Australians through a Voice to Parliament.

Inclusion of a preamble

The British act that established the Commonwealth of Australia and sets out the Constitution, includes a preamble, drafted during the 1897–8 constitutional conventions.[42] Since the 1980s, there has been in increase in the support for a change or replacement of this preamble. Despite receiving several submission, the 1988 Constitutional Commission rejected such a change due to the difficulty of drafting a proposal that would be accepted by all Australians and recognise Indigenous Australians, as well as their view that such a change should not be done unless the entire constitution was rewritten.[43]

Following this, the 1998 Constitution Convention recommended the inclusion of a new preamble, alongside their recommendation that Australia become a republic.[44] However, this recommendation was ultimately taken up by a constitutional monarchist, then prime minister, John Howard.[45] A draft, penned by Howard with the assistance of the poet Les Murray,[46] was heavily criticised by the Labor party, Indigenous leaders and the wider public. A modified version was released one day before the passage of legislation that authorised the 1999 referendum. This proposal was again opposed by the Labor party and was eventually defeated with a 60% no vote.[47] While debate around the preamble was minor compared with the debate around the republic, concerns were raised by opponents about the justiciability of the preamble, especially by those that opposed the inclusion of human rights guarantees in the document and by those who felt the court had become unduly "activist" in the wake of the Mabo decision.[48]

Republic proposals

Debates on whether Australian should become a republic have existed since Federation.

In November 1999 a referendum was held as to whether the Queen and the Governor-General ought be removed from the Constitution, to be replaced with a President. The referendum rejected the change.

Indigenous recognition and voice

Since 1910, there have been calls for constitutional reform to recognise Indigenous Australians.[49] In 1967, the Constitution was amended providing the Commonwealth with the power to legislate for all Indigenous Australians by removing the restriction preventing the Commonwealth from legislating in states.[50] At the same time, a limitation on including all Indigenous Australians in population counts for constitutional purposes was removed, which in 1967 was relevant only to section 24.[51][52] Since those reforms, other proposals have emerged. Guaranteed parliamentary representatives, a constitutionally recognised voice, and an inclusion of Indigenous Australians in a preamble to the Constitution are all proposals that have been made to reform the Australian Constitution to recognise Indigenous Australians.

In his Closing the Gap speech in February 2020, Prime Minister Scott Morrison reinforced the work of the Referendum Council, rejecting the idea of merely symbolic recognition, supporting a voice co-designed by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, "using the language of listening and empowerment". The Labor Party has supported a voice enshrined in the Constitution for a long time, and so have many of Australia's left-leaning minor parties.[53] However, many right-wing and regional groups have opposed the change.[54]

Cultural impact

The Constitution is often described as "virtually invisible" within Australian culture and mainstream political discourse.[55][56] It is especially compared to the US Constitution and the centrality of it to the country's civil religion. The Australian Constitution, in contrast, barely pierces the national consciousness, with one survey in 2015 finding that over a third of Australians had not heard of it.[57] Unlike the US Constitution, which through the words "We the People" describes itself as an expression of the national will, the Australian Constitution is contained within an act passed by the United Kingdom and its authority is described as deriving from the consent of the Queen and the UK Parliament.[58] Additionally, it contains no explicit statement of values, aspirations or rights nor does it describe an "objective order of values", as in the German Basic Law.[55] This "thin" nature of the Constitution is celebrated[58] by some academic, judicial and political commentators, and lamented by others.[56]

See also

Notes

  1. While the text of the Oath still specifies Queen Victoria, the note to the Schedule requires that "[t]he name of the King or Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland for the time being is to be substituted from time to time".
  2. Not to be confused with "reserved powers" of the states.

References

Citations

  1. "Constitution of Australia Act 1900". legislation.gov.uk. Retrieved 11 July 2020. The original text, as of 1900still official in the UK.
  2. "Constitution of Australia Act 1900". Federal Register of Legislation. Retrieved 11 July 2020. The current text.
  3. Parliamentary Education Office (6 September 2022). "Queen Victoria signed the Australian Constitution Act in July 1900. So why weren't we officially Australia then? What did the proclamation do?". Parliamentary Education Office. Commonwealth of Australia. Archived from the original on 20 April 2023.
  4. "Commonwealth of Australia Gazette No. 1". Commonwealth of Australia Gazette. No. 1. Australia, Australia. 1 January 1901. p. 1 via National Library of Australia.
  5. Lindell, G. J. (March 1986). "Why is Australia's Constitution Binding? – The Reason in 1900 and Now, and the Effect of Independence". Federal Law Review. 16 (1): 29–49. doi:10.1177/0067205X8601600102. ISSN 0067-205X. S2CID 159157171 via Austlii.
  6. "Constitutional referendums 1901–1999" (PDF). Australian Electoral Commission. Retrieved 15 October 2023.
  7. "Only eight of Australia's 44 referendums were a Yes. Here's what they were". Special Broadcasting Service. 7 July 2023. Retrieved 15 October 2023. [The Indigenous Voice to Parliament referendum] will be the 45th referendum in the nation's history
  8. Worthington, Brett (30 August 2023). "Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Voice to Parliament referendum set for October 14". ABC News. Australian Broadcasting Corporation. Archived from the original on 15 September 2023.
  9. Menzies, Robert (25 August 1937). "House of Representatives: Official Hansard" (PDF). Commonwealth of Australia. p. 94. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 September 2023. In point of practice the real and administrative legislative independence of Australia has never been challenged, since the Commonwealth was created.
  10. Powell, Graeme. "The quest for the nation's title deeds, 1901-1990". Australian Library and Information Association. Archived from the original on 6 July 2011. Retrieved 21 October 2023.
  11. "Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900", legislation.gov.uk, The National Archives, 9 July 1900, 1900 c. 12
  12. Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (Cth)
  13. Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v Commonwealth [1992] HCA 45 at para 37, (1992) 177 CLR 106, High Court (Australia)
  14. Evans, Simon (2004). "Why is the Constitution Binding? Authority, Obligation and the Role of the People" (PDF). Adelaide Law Review. 25 (1): 104–107. Archived from the original on 27 December 2022 via Austlii.
  15. Saunders, Cheryl (2010). The Constitution of Australia – A Contextual Analysis. Hart Publishing. ISBN 9781841137346.
  16. Strom, Marcus (18 August 2017). "The constitution is broken and out of date — we should abolish it and start again". ABC News. Archived from the original on 24 October 2021.
  17. Lambert, Scott (16 November 2017). "Principles for a new Australian Constitution". The Mandarin. Private Media Pty Ltd. Archived from the original on 21 November 2022.
  18. Belot, Henry (16 August 2017). "Howard, Hawke criticise career politicians 'with no life experience'". ABC News. Archived from the original on 27 April 2023.
  19. National Archives of Australia (22 June 2023). "Catch a glimpse of the original Australian Constitution at National Archives". National Archives of Australia. Archived from the original on 17 September 2023.
  20. "Constitution Day Celebrations". 9 July 2008. Archived from the original on 19 July 2008.
  21. Commonwealth Parliament; Parliament House, Canberra. "Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act". www.aph.gov.au. Retrieved 29 August 2023.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  22. Spry, Max (1995–1996). "The Executive Power of the commonwealth: its scope and limits". Research Paper 28 Last reviewed 19 July 2004 by the Parliamentary Library Web Manager. Archived from the original on 8 March 2016.
  23. Korff, Jens (8 October 2014). "Australian 1967 Referendum". creativespirits.info. Retrieved 9 November 2016.
  24. Constitution (Cth) Schedule 1 Oath.
  25. "Oath of Office". Office of the Official Secretary to the Governor-General. Archived from the original on 26 January 2014. Retrieved 15 January 2018.
  26. "Oaths and affirmations made by the executive and members of federal parliament since 1901". Parliamentary Library, Department of Parliamentary Services. Archived from the original on 7 March 2016.
  27. Gerangelos, George A., ed. (2017). Winterton's Australian Federal Constitutional Law (4th ed.). Pyrmont, NSW: Thomson Reuters. p. 236. ISBN 978-0-45523-972-9.
  28. Williams, George; Brennan, Sean; Lynch, Andrew (2018). Blackshield and Williams Australian Constitutional Law and Theory (7th ed.). Annandale, NSW: Federation Press. ISBN 978-1-76002-151-1.
  29. Gough Whitlam. The Truth of the Matter. Penguin. 1979 (Reprint: Melbourne University Press. 2005.)
  30. "Reflections from the Seventies (transcript)". ABC TV Four Corners. Archived from the original on 9 January 2009. Retrieved 13 January 2010.
  31. Kerr, John (11 November 1975). "Sir John Kerr's Statement of Reasons". whitlamdismissal.com (published 16 February 2015). Archived from the original on 16 April 2016.
  32. Harris, Bede (2015). Constitutional Law Guidebook (2nd ed.). Australia: Oxford University Press. pp. 61–3. ISBN 978-0-19-559400-3.
  33. Roach v Electoral Commissioner [2007] HCA 43, (2007) CLR 162.
  34. Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [1997] HCA 25, 189 CLR 520.
  35. Stone, Adrienne (2001). "Rights, Personal Rights and freedoms: The Nature of the Freedom of Political Communication". Melbourne University Law Review. 25 (2). Archived from the original on 28 April 2023 via Austlii.
  36. Williams, George; Brennan, Sean; Lynch, Andrew (2018). Blackshield and Williams Australian Constitutional Law and Theory: Commentary and Materials (7th ed.). Sydney: The Federation Press. p. 1408. ISBN 978-1-76002-151-1.
  37. Williams, George; Brennan, Sean; Lynch, Andrew (2018). Blackshield and Williams Australian Constitutional Law and Theory: Commentary and Materials (7th ed.). Sydney: The Federation Press. p. 1411. ISBN 978-1-76002-151-1.
  38. Williams, George; Hume, David (2010). People power: the history and future of the referendum in Australia. Sydney, N.S.W: University of New South Wales (UNSW) Press. p. 97. ISBN 978-1-74223-215-7.
  39. Souter, Gavin (1988). Acts of Parliament: A Narrative History of Australia's Federal Legislature. Melbourne University Press. p. 151. ISBN 0522844081.
  40. Souter 1988, p. 152.
  41. Souter 1988, pp. 297–298.
  42. Williams, George; McKenna, Mark; Simpson, Amelia (January 2001). "First words: the preamble to the Australian Constitution". University of New South Wales Law Journal. 24 (2): 384–5 via Informit.
  43. Constitutional Commission (1988). Final report of the Constitutional Commission (Report). Vol. 1. pp. 109–10. ISBN 0644068973.
  44. Williams, George; McKenna, Mark; Simpson, Amelia (January 2001). "With hope in God, the Prime Minister and the poet: lessons from the 1999 Referendum on the Preamble". The University of New South Wales Law Journal. 24 (2): 402 via Informit.
  45. Williams, George; McKenna, Mark; Simpson, Amelia (January 2001). "With hope in God, the Prime Minister and the poet: lessons from the 1999 Referendum on the Preamble". The University of New South Wales Law Journal. 24 (2): 402–10 via Informit.
  46. McCooey, David (29 April 2019). "Vale Les Murray, the unofficial Australian poet laureate who spoke to the world". The Conversation. Archived from the original on 6 February 2023.
  47. Williams, George; McKenna, Mark; Simpson, Amelia (January 2001). "With hope in God, the Prime Minister and the poet: lessons from the 1999 Referendum on the Preamble". The University of New South Wales Law Journal. 24 (2): 415 via Informit.
  48. Williams, George; McKenna, Mark; Simpson, Amelia (January 2001). "First words: the preamble to the Australian Constitution". University of New South Wales Law Journal. 24 (2): 396–7 via Informit.
  49. Expert Panel on Constitutional Recognition of Indigenous Australians (2012). "1.7 Early voices for change". Recognising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples in the Constitution : Report of the Expert Panel (PDF). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. pp. 28–31. ISBN 9781921975295. Retrieved 15 September 2020.
  50. Expert Panel on Constitutional Recognition of Indigenous Australians (2012). "1.8 The 1967 referendum". Recognising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Peoples in the Constitution : Report of the Expert Panel (PDF). Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia. p. 31. ISBN 9781921975295. Retrieved 15 September 2020.
  51. Sawer 1966, p. 25–26,30.
  52. Arcioni 2012, pp. 300–301.
  53. Davis, Megan (18 February 2020). "Constitutional recognition for Indigenous Australians must involve structural change, not mere symbolism". The Conversation. Archived from the original on 17 August 2023.
  54. "Voice support hits perilously low levels in regions". The Canberra Times. 3 July 2023. Retrieved 29 August 2023.
  55. Arcioni, Elisa; Stone, Adrienne (2016). "The small brown bird: Values and aspirations in the Australian Constitution". International Journal of Constitutional Law. 14 (1): 60–79. doi:10.1093/icon/mow003. ISSN 1474-2640.
  56. Lino, Dylan (2020). "The Australian Constitution as Symbol". Federal Law Review. 48 (4): 543–555. doi:10.1177/0067205X20955076. ISSN 0067-205X. S2CID 225303789.
  57. Miller, Nick (20 February 2015). "More than one third of Australians have not heard of the Constitution, survey finds". The Sydney Morning Herald. Retrieved 9 September 2023.
  58. Keane, Patrick A (12 June 2008). "In Celebration of the Constitution". Austlii.

Sources

Primary sources

Secondary sources

Further reading

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.