Criticism of monotheism

Criticism of monotheism has occurred throughout history. Mark S. Smith, an American biblical scholar and ancient historian, currently teaching at the Princeton Theological Seminary, wrote that monotheism has been a "totalizing discourse", often co-opting all aspects of a social belief system, resulting in the exclusion of "others".[1] Accusers have painted monotheism as a cause of ignorance, oppression, and violence.

This article is of a series on
Criticism of religion
By religion
By religious figure
By text
Religious violence
Bibliographies
Related topics

Contradictions

The major monotheistic religions, in defining the Deity, traditionally agree that the one God is (inter alia) omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent. However, one scholar argues that "this definition of God [is] contradictory to what has been perceived by us in the empirical world."[2]

Some feminist thinkers have criticized the monotheistic concept as the model of the highest form of patriarchal power. They argue that the one god regarded as male, opposes everything related to change, sensuality, nature, feeling, and femininity.[3]

Auguste Comte (1798-1857) also detected limitations in monotheism:

Monotheism in Western Europe is now as obsolete and as injurious as Polytheism was fifteen centuries ago. The discipline in which its moral value principally consisted has long since decayed; and consequently the sole effect of its doctrine, which has been so extravagantly praised, is to degrade the affections by unlimited desires, and to weaken the character by servile terrors. It supplied no field for the imagination, and forced it back upon Polytheism and Fetichism, which, under Theology, form the only possible foundation for poetry. The pursuits of practical life were never sincerely promoted by it, and they advanced only by evading or resisting its influence.[4]

Forcing one belief
David Hume

David Hume (1711–1776) argues that monotheism is less pluralistic and thus less tolerant than polytheism, because monotheism stipulates that people pigeonhole their beliefs into one tenet. [5] In the same vein, Auguste Comte argues, "Monotheism is irreconcilable with the existence in our nature of the instincts of benevolence" because it compels followers to devote themselves to a single Creator.[6] Jacob Neusner suggests that "the logic of monotheism ... yields little basis for tolerating other religions".[7]

James Lovelock criticized monotheism due to its idea of a transcendent almighty father; he says about monotheism that it "seems to anesthetize the sense of wonder as if one were committed to a single line of thought by a cosmic legal contract".[8]

Violence in monotheism

In modern times, ancient monotheism is blamed as the instigator of violence in its early days because it inspired the Israelites to wage war upon the Canaanites who believed in multiple gods.[9]

Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan regarded monotheism to be one reason for violence; he said:

The intolerance of narrow monotheism is written in letters of blood across the history of man from the time when first the tribes of Israel burst into the land of Canaan. The worshippers of the one jealous God are egged on to aggressive wars against people of alien [beliefs and cultures]. They invoke divine sanction for the cruelties inflicted on the conquered. The spirit of old Israel is inherited by Christianity and Islam, and it might not be unreasonable to suggest that it would have been better for Western civilization if Greece had moulded it on this question rather than Palestine.[10]

See also

References
  1. Mark S. Smith, "The Origins of Biblical Monotheism: Israel's Polytheistic Background and the Ugaritic Texts", (August 2001). p. 11. Oxford University Press. (Google Books).
  2. Worship as a Hindrance to Self "Worship as a Hindrance to Self-Actualization", by Daniel L. Kelley Archived 2008-07-23 at the Wayback Machine
  3. Lindsay Jones (ed.), Encyclopedia of Religion, Macmillan Reference USA, 2005, vol. 9, p. 6161.
  4. Comte, Auguste (1880) [1848]. "Conclusion. The Religion of Humanity". A General View of Positivism. Translated by Bridges, J. H. (2 ed.). London: Reeves & Turner. p. 294. Retrieved 10 October 2023.
  5. David Hume argued that unlike monotheism, polytheism is pluralistic in nature, unbound by doctrine, and therefore far more tolerant than monotheism, which tends to force people to believe in one faith.(Diavid Hume, Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion and the Natural History of Religion, ed. J. C. A. Gaskin, New York: Oxford University Press, 1983, pp. 26-32.
  6. The Catechism of Positive Religion, page 251
  7. Berchman, Robert M. (May 2008). "The Political Foundations of Tolerance in the Greco-Roman Period". In Neusner, Jacob; Chilton, Bruce (eds.). Religious Tolerance in World Religions. Templeton Foundation Press (published 2008). p. 61. ISBN 9781599471365. Retrieved 2016-07-03. Jacob Neusner [...] claims that 'the logic of monotheism ... yields little basis for tolerating other religions.'
  8. James William Gibson, "A Reenchanted World: The Quest for a New Kinship with Nature", Macmillan, 2009, p. 98.
  9. Regina Schwartz, The Curse of Cain: The Violent Legacy of Monotheism, The University of Chicago Press, 1997 ISBN 978-0-226-74199-4
  10. Arvind Sharma, "A Primal Perspective on the Philosophy of Religion", Dordrecht, Springer, 2006, p.29.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.