Aesthetic taste

In aesthetics, the concept of taste has been the interest of philosophers such as Plato, Hume, and Kant. It is defined by the ability to make valid judgments about an object's aesthetic value. However, these judgments are deficient in objectivity, creating the 'paradox of taste'. The term 'taste' is used because these judgments are similarly made when one physically tastes food.[1]

For Kant, beauty is not a property of any object, but an aesthetic judgement based on a subjective feeling.

For Kant, as discussed in his Critique of Judgment, beauty is not a property of any object, but an aesthetic judgement based on a subjective feeling. He claims that a genuine good taste does exist, though it could not be empirically identified. The validity of a judgement is not to be ascertained by means of the general view of the majority or some specific social group because taste is both personal and beyond reasoning. Nonetheless, Kant stresses that our preferences, even on generally liked things, do not justify the objectivity of our judgements.[2]

Bourdieu argued against the Kantian view of pure aesthetics, stating that the legitimate taste of the society is the taste of the ruling class. This position also rejects the idea of genuine good taste, as the legitimate taste is merely a class taste. This idea was also proposed by Simmel, who noted that the upper classes abandon fashions as they are adopted by lower ones.

Bad taste

Bad taste (also poor taste or vulgarity) is generally used to deride individuals with 'poor' aesthetic judgment.[3] Bad taste can become a respected and cultivated (if perhaps defiant and belligerent) aesthetic, for example in the works of filmmaker John Waters, sculptor Jeff Koons, or the popular McMansion style of architecture.

A contemporary view—a retrospective review of literature—is that "a good deal of dramatic verse written during the Elizabethan and Jacobean periods is in poor taste because it is bombast [high-sounding language with little meaning]".[4]

Grayck argues that individuals can only be judged as having poor taste if their tastes are informed by the aesthetics education they received.[3]

See also

Notes

  1. Bonard, Constant; Cova, Florian; Humbert-Droz, Steve (2021). "De gustibus est disputandum: An empirical investigation of the folk concept of aesthetic taste". PsyArVix Preprints via PsyArVix Preprints.
  2. Gronow, Jukka (1997). Sociology of Taste. London: Routledge. pp. 11, 87. ISBN 0-415-13294-0.
  3. Gracyk, Theodore A. (1 April 1990). "Having Bad Taste". The British Journal of Aesthetics. 30 (2): 117–131. doi:10.1093/bjaesthetics/30.2.117.
  4. Abrams, M. H. (1998). "Vulgarity". Dictionary of Literary Terms and Literary Theory. Penguin. p. 976. ISBN 978-0-631-20271-4.

References

  • Arsel, Zeynep; Jonathan Bean (2013). "Taste Regimes and Market-Mediated Practice". Journal of Consumer Research. 39 (5): 899–917. doi:10.1086/666595.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-04546-0.
  • Bourdieu, Pierre (1986). "The Forms of Capital". In Richardson, John G (ed.). Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press. ISBN 0-313-23529-5.
  • Bragg, Melvyn (25 October 2007), Taste, In Our Time, BBC Radio 4, retrieved 18 September 2010
  • Ekelund, Robert B. Jr.; Hébert, Robert F. (1990). A History of Economic Theory and Method. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. ISBN 0-07-019416-5.
  • Friedman, Sam; Kuipers, Giselinde (2013). "The divisive power of humour: Comedy, taste and symbolic boundaries" (PDF). Cultural Sociology. 7 (2): 179–195. doi:10.1177/1749975513477405. S2CID 53362319.
  • Gronow, Jukka (1997). Sociology of Taste. London: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-13294-0.
  • Hennion, Antoine (2007). "Those Things That Hold Us Together: Taste and Sociology". Cultural Sociology. London: Sage. 1 (1): 97–114.
  • Holt, Douglas B. (June 1998). "Does Cultural Capital Structure American Consumption?"". The Journal of Consumer Research. 25 (1): 1–25.
  • Horkheimer, Max; Adorno, Theodor W (1982). Dialectic of the Enlightenment. New York: The Continuum publishing Corporation. ISBN 0-8264-0093-0.
  • Koehrsen, Jens (2018). "Religious Tastes and Styles as Markers of Class Belonging" (PDF). Sociology. doi:10.1177/0038038517722288. S2CID 149369482.
  • Outwaite, William; Bottonmore, Tom (1996). The Blackwell Dictionary of Twentieth-Century Social Thought. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
  • Simmel, Georg (May 1957). "Fashion". The American Journal of Sociology. 62 (6): 541–558.
  • Slater, Don (1997). Consumer Culture and Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press. ISBN 978-0-7456-0304-9.
  • Spicher, Michael R. "Aesthetic Taste". Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  • Stern, Jane; Stern, Michael (1990). The Encyclopedia of Bad Taste. New York: Harper Collins. ISBN 0-06-016470-0.
  • Vercelloni, Luca (2016). The Invention of Taste. A Cultural Account of Desire, Delight and Disgust in Fashion, Food and Art. London: Bloomsbury. ISBN 978-1-4742-7360-2.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.