Greece–Ottoman Empire relations

Greece and the Ottoman Empire had a history of conflict. They developed formal relations in 1830 when Greece was recognised as an independent state by the Ottoman Empire following the Greek War of Independence.

For relations after 1923 with Turkey, see Greece–Turkey relations.

Background

Greek and Turk relations: 6th–14th centuries
Main article: Foreign relations of the Byzantine Empire § Byzantine and Persian-Turk relations
Byzantine territory (purple), Byzantine campaigns (red) and Seljuk campaigns (green)

The Byzantine Empire although a different regime to the nation of Greece, factors into the nations modern relations as heritage.[1] Some view the Byzantine Empire (the Greek-speaking Eastern Roman Empire during the medieval era) as the medieval expression of a Greek nation and a pre-modern nation state.[2]

The Göktürks of the First Turkic Khaganate were the first Turkic state to use the name Türk politically.[3] The first contact with the Romans (Byzantine Empire) is believed to be 563.[4][5] The 10th century saw the rise of the Seljuk Turks.[6]

The first conflict between the Byzantine Empire and Seljuk Turks occurred at the Battle of Kapetron in 1048. More notable is the Battle of Manzikert in 1071 and the Turkish settlement of Anatolia that followed. Later, Turkish Anatolian beyliks were established both in formerly Byzantine lands and in the territory of the fragmenting Seljuk Sultanate.[7] One of those beyliks was the Ottoman dynasty and become the Ottoman Empire.[8] In 1453, the Ottoman Empire conquered Constantinople, the capital city of the Byzantine Empire.[9]

The Rum Millet: 15th–19th centuries
Main article: Rum Millet
See also: Names of the Greeks, Background of the Greek War of Independence, and Greek Plan

All of modern Greece by the time of the capture of the Despotate of the Morea was under Ottoman authority, with the exception of some of the islands.

  • Islands such as Rhodes (1522), Cyprus (1571), and Crete (1669) resisted longer due to other empires that came into power from the Frankokratia days
  • The Ionian Islands were never ruled by the Ottomans, with the exception of Kefalonia (from 1479 to 1481 and from 1485 to 1500), and remained under the rule of the Republic of Venice until their capture by the First French Republic in 1797, then passed to the United Kingdom in 1809 until their unification with Greece in 1864.[10]
  • The mountains of Greece were largely untouched, and were a refuge for Greeks who desired to flee Ottoman rule and engage in guerrilla warfare.[11]
  • In 1770, the Ottoman army invaded the Mani, one of a series of battles by the Ottomans to subdue the Maniots. The Ottoman's would attempt again in 1803, 1807 and 1815.
A map of the territorial expansion of the Ottoman Empire from 1307 to 1683.

Life under the Ottoman Empire had several dimensions:

  • All conquered Orthodox Christians would be included in the Rum Millet (millet-i Rûm) or the "Roman nation", and enjoyed a certain autonomy.[12] It was named after Roman ("Romioi" in Greek and "Byzantine" by modern historians) subjects of the Ottoman Empire. Christian Orthodox Greeks, Bulgarians, Albanians, Georgians, Arabs, Aromanians, Megleno-Romanians, and Serbs were all considered part of the same millet and the religious hierarchy was dominated by Greeks[12] (but there is evidence that they had different names with Rum representing Greeks only).[13]
  • Devshirme was a child levy (in Greek: paidomazoma) which was emotionally traumatic for families.[14] Boys were recruited and forcefully converted to Islam to serve the state but it was also done as a means to dismantle clan ties and dissolve traditions.[15] Historian Constantine Paparrigopoulos estimated 1 million boys were recruited as Janissaries ; a figure closer to 1 in 40 is more likely.[16]
  • Dhimmi were subject to the heavy jizya tax, which was about 20%, versus the Muslim zakat, which was about 3%.[17] Other major taxes were the Defter and İspençe and the more severe haraç, whereby a document was issued which stated that "the holder of this certificate is able to keep his head on the shoulders since he paid the Χαράτσι tax for this year..." All these taxes were waived if the person converted to Islam.[18][19][20]

Romioi in various places of the Greek peninsula would at times rise up against Ottoman rule, taking advantage of wars the Ottoman Empire would engage in. Those uprisings were of mixed scale and impact.

Greek nationalism started to appear in the 18th century.

  • Following the Orlov Revolt and the Russo-Turkish War (1768–1774), the Treaty of Küçük Kaynarca gave Russian involvement to intervene on the side of Ottoman Eastern Orthodox subjects.
  • Greek ethnic identity had fused with the Rum millet identity. However, the 18th century enlightenment would inspire a new secular "Hellenic" identity of the Rum millet. There was a reconceptualisation of the Rum Millet from being Greek Orthodox religion adherents to all Greek speakers[29] The French Revolution further intensified the growing battle between conservative and liberal Greek Orthodox elites and in the 1790–1800 decade a heated conflict broke out [30]
  • Despite Greek-speaking and non-Greek speaking Orthodox Christians at the time identifying as Romioi, one of the enlightenment intellectuals Adamantios Korais pushed the word Graikoi as a replacement as it helped disassociate it from the Roman heritage and the Church (as well as being an older word than Hellenes).[31]
  • Revolutionary instigator Rigas Velestinlis and the Filiki Eteria behind the 1821 uprising intended to have a Balkan Orthodox uprising and a coalition between all the different ethnic communities.[29] The focus of revolution ideology was the division between the Muslim Ottoman privileged class Askeri with the second class citizens Rayah which was predominately Greek Orthodox.[32][33]
  • Ottoman authorities believed Russia's imperial agenda and the general weakness of the state rather than conscientious political action is why the Greek revolution started.[34]

In March 1821, the Greek War of Independence from the Ottoman Empire began. In Constantinople, on Easter Sunday, the Patriarch of the Greek Orthodox Church, Gregory V, was publicly hanged although he had condemned the revolution and preached obedience to the Sultan in his sermons.[35]

History

Formation of Greece: 1822–1832
Main articles: Greek War of Independence and First Hellenic Republic
Territorial Expansion of Greece from 1832 to 1947

Building on the success of the first year of war, the Greek Constitution of 1822 would be the first of the new state, adopted at the first National Assembly at Epidaurus.

However, the Greek victories would be short-lived as civil war would weaken its ability to react; the Sultan called for aid from his Egyptian vassal Muhammad Ali, who dispatched his son Ibrahim Pasha to Greece with a fleet and 8,000 men, and later added 25,000 troops.[36] Ibrahim's intervention proved decisive: much of the Peloponnese was reconquered in 1825; the gateway town of Messolonghi fell in 1826; and Athens was taken in 1827. The only territory still held by Greek nationalists was in Nafplion, Mani, Hydra, Spetses and Aegina.[36][37][38] During this time, there were many massacres during the Greek War of Independence committed by both revolutionaries and the Ottoman Empire's forces.

The Treaty of London (1827) was declined by the Ottoman Empire, which led to the Battle of Navarino in 1827. The French Morea expedition between 1828 and 1833 would expel Egyptian troops from the Peloponnese and the Russo-Turkish War (1828–1829) which occurred in retaliation due to Russian support at Navarino, led to the Treaty of Adrianople (1829) which enforced the Treaty of London. Karl Marx in an article in the New York Tribune (21 April 1853), wrote: "Who solved finally the Greek case? It was neither the rebellion of Ali Pasha, neither the battle in Navarino, neither the French Army in Peloponnese, neither the conferences and protocols of London; but it was Diebitsch, who invaded through the Balkans to Evros".[39]

The establishment of a Greek state was recognized in the London Protocol of 1828 but it was not until the London Protocol (1830), which amended the decisions of the 1829 protocol, that Greece was established as an independent, sovereign state. The assassination of Ioannis Kapodistrias, Greece's first governor, would lead to the London Conference of 1832 and that formed the Kingdom of Greece with the Treaty of Constantinople (1832).

The first borders of the Greek state consisted of the Greek mainland south of a line from Arta to Volos plus Euboea and the Cyclades islands in the Aegean Sea. The rest of the Greek-speaking lands, including Crete, Cyprus and the rest of the Aegean islands, Epirus, Thessaly, Macedonia and Thrace, remained under Ottoman rule. Over one million Greeks also lived in what is now Turkey, mainly in the Aegean region of Asia Minor, especially around Smyrna, in the Pontus region on the Black Sea coast, in the Gallipoli peninsula, in Cappadocia, in Istanbul, in Imbros and in Tenedos.

Kingdom of Greece and Ottoman Empire: 1832–1913
Main articles: Eastern Question, Megali Idea, Greco-Turkish War (1897), and Balkan Wars
The first Ottoman ambassador to the Greek Kingdom, the Phanariote Konstantinos Mousouros, at a ball in the royal palace in Athens

The relations between Greece and the Ottoman Empire during this time period were shaped by two concepts:

  • Termed in history as the Eastern Question with regards to the "sick man of Europe", it encompassed myriad interrelated elements: Ottoman military defeats, Ottoman institutional insolvency, the ongoing Ottoman political and economic modernization programme, the rise of ethno-religious nationalism in its provinces, and Great Power rivalries.[40]
  • In Greek politics, the Megali Idea.[41] It was an irredentist concept that expressed the goal of reviving the Byzantine Empire,[42] by establishing a Greek state, which would include the large Greek populations that were still under Ottoman rule after the end of the Greek War of Independence (1821–1828) and all the regions that had large Greek populations (parts of the Southern Balkans, Asia Minor and Cyprus).[43] The term was first introduced by Greek Prime Minister Ioannis Kolettis in 1844 in the inaugural speech of the first Greek constitution in front of Greece's parliament for a common destiny of all Greeks.[44] During the Crimean war the following decade, it became a platform for territorial expansion.[45] It came to dominate foreign relations and played a significant role in domestic politics for much of the first century of Greek independence.

There were five wars that directly and indirectly linked all conflict

The Young Turks, who seized power in the Ottoman Empire in 1908, were Turkish nationalists whose objective was to create a strong, centrally governed state. The Christian minorities of the Empire, including Greeks, saw their position in the Empire deteriorate.

End of the Ottoman Empire and formation of Turkey: 1914–1923
Main articles: Ottoman Empire in World War I, Greco-Turkish War (1919–22), and Turkish War of Independence

Greece entered the First World War on the side of the Allies in the summer of 1917 following The Great Division between the King and Prime Minister Eleftherios Venizelos The Ottoman Empire entered the War with the attack on Russia's Black Sea coast on 29 October 1914. The attack prompted Russia and its allies, Britain and France, to declare war on the Ottoman Empire in November 1914. The Armistice of Mudros was signed on 31 October 1918, ending the Ottoman participation in World War I.

With the Allies victory in World War I, Greece was rewarded with territorial acquisitions, specifically Western Thrace (Treaty of Neuilly-sur-Seine) and Eastern Thrace and the Smyrna area (Treaty of Sèvres). Greek gains were largely undone by the subsequent Greco-Turkish War (1919–1922).[47]

Overcrowded boats with refugees fleeing the Great fire of Smyrna. The photo was taken from the launch boat of a US warship.
  • Greece occupied Smyrna on 15 May 1919, while Mustafa Kemal Pasha (later Atatürk), who was to become the leader of the Turkish opposition to the Treaty of Sèvres, landed in Samsun on May 19, 1919, an action that is regarded as the beginning of the Turkish War of Independence. He united the protesting voices in Anatolia and set in motion a nationalist movement to repel the Allied armies that had occupied Turkey and establish new borders for a sovereign Turkish nation. The Turkish nation would be Western in civilization and elevated its Turkish culture (which had faded under Arab culture), which included disassociating Islam from Arab culture and restricted into the private sphere.[48] Having created a separate government in Ankara, Kemal's government did not recognise the Treaty of Sèvres and fought to have it revoked.
  • The Turkish army entered Smyrna/İzmir on 9 September 1922, effectively ending the Greco-Turkish War (1919–1922) in the field. The Greek army and administration had already left by sea. The war was put to an end by the Armistice of Mudanya.
  • According to some historians, it was the Greek occupation of Smyrna that created the Turkish National movement. Arnold J. Toynbee argues: "The war between Turkey and Greece which burst out at this time was a defensive war for safeguarding of the Turkish homelands in Anatolia. It was a result of the Allied policy of imperialism operating in a foreign state, the military resources and powers of which were seriously under-estimated; it was provoked by the unwarranted invasion of a Greek army of occupation."[49] According to others, the landing of the Greek troops in Smyrna was part of Eleftherios Venizelos's plan, inspired by the Megali Idea, to liberate the large Greek populations in the Asia Minor.[50] Prior to the Great Fire of Smyrna, Smyrna had a bigger Greek population than the Greek capital, Athens. Athens, before the Population exchange, had a population of 473,000,[51] while Smyrna, according to Ottoman sources, in 1910, had a Greek population exceeding 629,000.[52]

On 1 November 1922, the Turkish Parliament in Ankara formally abolished the Sultanate, thus ending 623 years of monarchical Ottoman rule. The Treaty of Lausanne of 24 July 1923, which superseded the Treaty of Sèvres, led to the international recognition of the sovereignty of the newly formed "Republic of Turkey" as the successor state of the Ottoman Empire, and the republic was officially proclaimed on 29 October 1923 in Ankara, the country's new capital.[53] The Lausanne Convention stipulated a population exchange between Greece and Turkey, whereby 1.1 million Greeks left Turkey for Greece in exchange for 380,000 Muslims transferred from Greece to Turkey.[54]

  • The Treaty of Lausanne also provided for a Population exchange between Greece and Turkey that had begun before the final signature of the treaty in July 1923. About one and a half million Greeks had to leave Turkey for Greece and about half a million Turks had to leave Greece for Turkey (note that the population exchange was on religious grounds, thus the exchange was officially that of Christians for Muslims). The exceptions to the population exchange were Istanbul (Constantinople) and the islands of Gökçeada (Imbros) and Bozcaada (Tenedos), where the Greek minority (including the Ecumenical Patriarch) was allowed to stay, and Western Thrace, whose Muslim minority was also allowed to stay.
  • The Treaty awarded the islands of Imbros and Tenedos to Turkey, with special provisions for the Greeks living there. These rights were revoked or violated by the 26 June 1927 legislation of "Civil Law"[55]

There were atrocities and ethnic cleansing by both sides during this period. The war with Greece and the revolutionary Turks saw both sides commit atrocities. The Greek genocide was the systematic killing of the Christian Ottoman Greek population of Anatolia which started before the World War I, continued during the war and its aftermath (1914–1922). It was perpetrated by the government of the Ottoman Empire led by the Three Pashas and by the Government of the Grand National Assembly led by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk,[56] against the indigenous Greek population of the Empire.

References
  1. Isiskal, Hüseyin (2002). "An Analysis of the Turkish-Greek Relations from Greek 'Self' and Turkish 'Other' Perspective: Causes of Antagonism and Preconditions for Better Relationships" (PDF). Turkish Journal of International Relations. 1: 118.
  2. Stouraitis, Ioannis (2014-07-01). "Roman identity in Byzantium: a critical approach". Byzantinische Zeitschrift (in German). 107 (1): 176. doi:10.1515/bz-2014-0009. ISSN 1868-9027. S2CID 174769546.
  3. West, Barbara A. (19 May 2010). Encyclopedia of the Peoples of Asia and Oceania. Infobase Publishing. p. 829. ISBN 978-1-4381-1913-7. The first people to use the ethnonym Turk to refer to themselves were the Turuk people of the Gokturk Khanate in the mid sixth-century
  4. Qiang, Li; Kordosis, Stefanos (2018). "The Geopolitics on the Silk Road: Resurveying the Relationship of the Western Türks with Byzantium through Their Diplomatic Communications". Medieval Worlds. medieval worlds (Volume 8. 2018): 109–125. doi:10.1553/medievalworlds_no8_2018s109. ISSN 2412-3196.
  5. Sinor, Dennis (1996). The First Türk Empire (553–682). pp. 327–332. ISBN 978-92-3-103211-0. Retrieved 2022-01-23. {{cite book}}: |website= ignored (help)
  6. Lars Johanson; Éva Ágnes Csató Johanson (2015). The Turkic Languages. p. 25. The name 'Seljuk is a political rather than ethnic name. It derives from Selčiik, born Toqaq Temir Yally, a war-lord (sil-baši), from the Qiniq tribal grouping of the Oghuz. Seljuk, in the rough and tumble of internal Oghuz politics, fled to Jand, c.985, after falling out with his overlord.
  7. Imber, Colin (2009). The Ottoman Empire, 1300-1650: The Structure of Power (2 ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 6–7.
  8. Kafadar, Cemal (1995). Between Two Worlds: The Construction of the Ottoman State. p. 122. That they hailed from the Kayı branch of the Oğuz confederacy seems to be a creative "rediscovery" in the genealogical concoction of the fifteenth century. It is missing not only in Ahmedi but also, and more importantly, in the Yahşi Fakih-Aşıkpaşazade narrative, which gives its own version of an elaborate genealogical family tree going back to Noah. If there was a particularly significant claim to Kayı lineage, it is hard to imagine that Yahşi Fakih would not have heard of it.
    • Lindner, Rudi Paul (1983). Nomads and Ottomans in Medieval Anatolia. Indiana University Press. p. 10. In fact, no matter how one were to try, the sources simply do not allow the recovery of a family tree linking the antecedents of Osman to the Kayı of the Oğuz tribe.
  9. Durant, Will (1300). The story of civilisation: Volume VI: The Reformation. p. 227. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.457.975.
  10. Richard Clogg (20 June 2002). A Concise History of Greece. Cambridge University Press. p. 10. ISBN 978-0-521-00479-4. OCLC 1000695918.
  11. World and Its Peoples. Marshall Cavendish. 2009. p. 1478. ISBN 978-0-7614-7902-4. The klephts were descendants of Greeks who fled into the mountains to avoid the Turks in the fifteenth century and who remained active as brigands into the nineteenth century.
  12. Masters, Bruce (2006). "Christians in a changing world". In Faroqhi, Suraiya N. (ed.). The Cambridge History of Turkey, Volume 3: The Late Ottoman Empire, 1603–1839. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 272–280. ISBN 978-0-521-62095-6. LCCN 2006013835.
  13. Istoriia na bŭlgarite. Georgi Markov, Dimitŭr. Zafirov, Emil Aleksandrov, Георги. Марков, Димитър. Зафиров, Емил Александров (1. izd ed.). Sofia: Izd-vo "Znanie". 2004. p. 23. ISBN 978-954-528-289-8. OCLC 69645946. A sultan's Firman in 1680 lists the ethnic groups on the Balkan lands as follows: Greeks (Rum), Albanians (Arnaut), Serbs (Sirf), "Vlachs" (Eflak, referring to the Aromanians and Megleno-Romanians), and Bulgarians (Bulgar).{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: others (link)
  14. Yilmaz, Gulay (2013). The economic and social roles of janissaries in a 17th century Ottoman city: the case of Istanbul. Library and Archives Canada = Bibliothèque et Archives Canada. p. 38. ISBN 978-0-494-78718-2. OCLC 1019481205.
  15. Yilmaz, Gulay (2013). The economic and social roles of janissaries in a 17th century Ottoman city: the case of Istanbul. Library and Archives Canada = Bibliothèque et Archives Canada. p. 33. ISBN 978-0-494-78718-2. OCLC 1019481205.
  16. Yilmaz, Gulay (2013). The economic and social roles of janissaries in a 17th century Ottoman city: the case of Istanbul. Library and Archives Canada = Bibliothèque et Archives Canada. p. 30. ISBN 978-0-494-78718-2. OCLC 1019481205. According to Kavanin-i Yeni eriyan, it was forbidden to take the only son of a family, or more than one boy from the same family; and only one boy could be taken from every forty households. Uzun arşılı states that "the one in forty" application was rarely used, but the basis for his statement is unclear
  17. Taxation in the Ottoman Empire
  18. Νικόλαος Φιλιππίδης (1900). Επίτομος Ιστορία του Ελληνικού Έθνους 1453–1821. Εν Αθήναις: Εκ του Τυπογραφείου Α. Καλαράκη. Ανακτήθηκε στις 23 Ιουλίου 2010.
  19. Ιωάννης Λυκούρης (1954). Η διοίκησις και δικαιοσύνη των τουρκοκρατούμενων νήσων : Αίγινα – Πόρος – Σπέτσαι – Ύδρα κλπ., επί τη βάσει εγγράφων του ιστορικού αρχείου Ύδρας και άλλων. Αθήνα. Ανακτήθηκε στις 7 Δεκεμβρίου 2010.
  20. Παναγής Σκουζές (1777–1847) (1948). Χρονικό της σκλαβωμένης Αθήνας στα χρόνια της τυρανίας του Χατζή Αλή (1774–1796). Αθήνα: Α. Κολολού. Ανακτήθηκε στις 6 Ιανουαρίου 2011.
  21. Longnon, J. 1949. Chronique de Morée: Livre de la conqueste de la princée de l'Amorée, 1204–1305. Paris.
  22. Απόστολου Βακαλόπουλου, Ιστορία του Νέου Ελληνισμού, Γ' τομ., Θεσσαλονίκη 1968
  23. Joseph von Hammer-Purgstall: Geschichte des osmanischen Reiches: Bd. 1574–1623, p. 442; note a. "Prete scorticato, la pelle sua piena di paglia portata in Constantinopoli con molte teste dei figli d'Albanesi, che avevano intelligenza colli Spagnoli"
  24. Setton, Kenneth Meyer (1991), Venice, Austria, and the Turks in the Seventeenth Century, Diane Publishing p189
  25. Finlay, George (1856). The History of Greece under Othoman and Venetian Domination. London: William Blackwood and Sons. p 210-3
  26. George Childs Kohn (Editor) Dictionary of Wars Archived 2013-11-09 at the Wayback Machine 650 pages ISBN 1-57958-204-4 ISBN 978-1-57958-204-3 Page 155
  27. Finley, The history of Greece under Othman and Venetian Domination, 1856 pp. 330–334
  28. Dakin, Douglas The Greek Struggle for Independence, 1821–1833, University of California Press, (1973) pp. 26–27
  29. Roudometof, Victor (1998). "From Rum Millet to Greek Nation: Enlightenment, Secularization, and National Identity in Ottoman Balkan Society, 1453–1821" (PDF). Journal of Modern Greek Studies. 16 (1): 33. doi:10.1353/mgs.1998.0024. ISSN 1086-3265. S2CID 144013073.
  30. Roudometof, Victor (1998). "From Rum Millet to Greek Nation: Enlightenment, Secularization, and National Identity in Ottoman Balkan Society, 1453–1821" (PDF). Journal of Modern Greek Studies. 16 (1): 33. doi:10.1353/mgs.1998.0024. ISSN 1086-3265. S2CID 144013073. The French Revolution, which intensified this battle between conservative and liberal Greek Orthodox elites, represented the second main source of inspiration for the new secular Greek Orthodox intelligentsia. In the 1790–1800 decade, a heated conflict broke out between conservatives and liberals during which the Church did not hesitate to condemn Godless "Franco-masonic" ideas, while proponents of "enlightened reason" accused the Church of "voluntary slavery."
  31. Zervas, Theodore G. (2010-01-01). Resurrecting the Past, Constructing the Future: A Historical Investigation on the Formation of a Greek National Identity in Schools, 1834–1913. Loyola eCommons. p. 91. OCLC 881641720.
  32. "Kemal Karpat. An Inquiry into the Social Foundations of Nationalism in the Ottoman State: From Social Estates to Classes, from Millets to Nations. (Research Monograph number 39.) Princeton: Center of International Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, Princeton University. 1973". The American Historical Review. 1973. doi:10.1086/ahr/80.3.695-a. ISSN 1937-5239. Cited in Roudometof, Victor (1998). "From Rum Millet to Greek Nation: Enlightenment, Secularization, and National Identity in Ottoman Balkan Society, 1453-1821" (PDF). Journal of Modern Greek Studies. 16 (1): 21. doi:10.1353/mgs.1998.0024. ISSN 1086-3265. S2CID 144013073.
  33. Neoklēs, Sarris (1990). οσμανική πραγματικότητα (Osmanikē pragmatikotēta): systēmikē para-thesē domōn kai leiturgiōn. 1, To despotiko kratos. Athens: Arsenidēs. ISBN 960-253-002-2. OCLC 633532188. Cited in Roudometof, Victor (1998). "From Rum Millet to Greek Nation: Enlightenment, Secularization, and National Identity in Ottoman Balkan Society, 1453-1821" (PDF). Journal of Modern Greek Studies. 16 (1): 21. doi:10.1353/mgs.1998.0024. ISSN 1086-3265. S2CID 144013073.
  34. Ilıcak, H. Şükrü (2021). "Those Infidel Greeks" (2 vols.) The Greek War of Independence through Ottoman Archival Documents. pp. 1–30 (introduction). ISBN 978-90-04-47130-6. OCLC 1286298373. Fear of collapse and dissolution, heavy emphasis on foreign conspiracy and intervention, categorical denial of the insurgents' historical agency, the pampered "other" turning into pawns in the hands of foreign powers, a discourse of isolation in the international arena, and a feeling of victimization are the main themes that run through the documents in this book, mainstream Ottoman/Turkish historiography, and, indeed, the speeches of contemporary Turkish politicians
  35. Brewer, David The Greek War of Independence, London: Overlook Duckworth, 2011 p. 105.
  36. Hellenic Army General Staff (1998). An index of events in the military history of the Greek nation. Athens: Army History Directorate. pp. 51, 54. ISBN 960-7897-27-7. OCLC 50662008.
  37. Woodhouse, C. M. (1977). The Philhellenes. Doric. p. 192. ISBN 0-902999-09-5. OCLC 13053581.
  38. Péchoux, Pierre-Yves (1994-01-01). "Georges Contogeorgis, Histoire de la Grèce, Paris, 1992, 479 p. / Arthur de Gobineau, Au royaume des Hellènes, 1993, 312 p." CEMOTI (17): 329–331. doi:10.4000/cemoti.296. ISSN 0764-9878.
  39. Marx, Karl (April 21, 1853). "What Is to Become of Turkey in Europe?". New York Tribune.
  40. Theophilus C. Prousis. Review of Macfie, A. L., The Eastern Question, 1774–1923. Habsburg, H-Net Reviews. December, 1996.
  41. Mateos, Natalia Ribas. The Mediterranean in the Age of Globalization: Migration, Welfare & Borders. Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-1-4128-3775-0.
  42. Roumen Daskalov, Tchavdar Marinov, Entangled Histories of the Balkans - Volume One: National Ideologies and Language Policies; Brill, 2013; ISBN 90-04-25076-X, p. 200.
  43. "European Election Database – Background – Greece". o.nsd.no.
  44. Grigoriadis, Ioannis N. (2011). "Redefining the Nation: Shifting Boundaries of the 'Other' in Greece and Turkey". Middle Eastern Studies. 47 (1): 169–170. doi:10.1080/00263206.2011.536632. hdl:11693/11995. ISSN 0026-3206. JSTOR 27920347. S2CID 44340675.
  45. Κρεμμυδας, Βασιλης (2010). Η μεγάλη ιδέα: μεταμορφώσεις ενός εθνικού ιδεολογήματος. Ekdoseis Typōthētō. pp. 38–39. ISBN 978-960-402-374-5. OCLC 681904431. cited in Kaldellis, Anthony (2022). "From "Empire of the Greeks" to "Byzantium"". In Ransohoff, Jake; Aschenbrenner, Nathanael (eds.). The Invention of Byzantium in Early Modern Europe. Harvard University Press. p. 360. ISBN 978-0-88402-484-2.
  46. Anderson and Hershey, pp. 439-440
  47. Petsalis-Diomidis, Nicholas. Greece at the Paris Peace Conference/1919. Inst. for Balkan Studies, 1978.
  48. Grigoriadis, Ioannis N. (2011). "Redefining the Nation: Shifting Boundaries of the 'Other' in Greece and Turkey". Middle Eastern Studies. 47 (1): 175. doi:10.1080/00263206.2011.536632. hdl:11693/11995. ISSN 0026-3206. JSTOR 27920347. S2CID 44340675.
  49. Toynbee, Arnold J; Kirkwood, Kenneth P (1926), Turkey, London: Ernest Benn, p. 94.
  50. Giles Milton, Paradise Lost, 2008, Sceptre, ISBN 978-0-340-83786-3
  51. Tung, Anthony (2001). "The City the Gods Besieged". Preserving the World's Great Cities: The Destruction and Renewal of the Historic Metropolis. New York: Three Rivers Press. p. 266. ISBN 0-609-80815-X, the same source depicts a table with Athens having a population of 123,000 in 1896
  52. Pentzopoulos, Dimitri (2002). The Balkan Exchange of Minorities and Its Impact on Greece. C. Hurst & Co. pp. 29–30. ISBN 978-1-85065-702-6
  53. Axiarlis, Evangelia (2014). Political Islam and the Secular State in Turkey: Democracy, Reform and the Justice and Development Party. I.B. Tauris. p. 11.
  54. Clogg, Richard (2002). A Concise History of Greece. Cambridge University Press. p. 101. ISBN 978-0-521-00479-4. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
  55. Alexandris, Alexis (1980). Imbros and Tenedos: A Study of Turkish Attitudes Toward Two Ethnic Greek Island Communities Since 1923 (PDF). Pella. p. 21.
  56. Meichanetsidis, Vasileios (2015). "The Genocide of the Greeks of the Ottoman Empire, 1913–1923: A Comprehensive Overview". Genocide Studies International. 9 (1): 104–173. doi:10.3138/gsi.9.1.06. ISSN 2291-1847. S2CID 154870709. The genocide was committed by two subsequent and chronologically, ideologically, and organically interrelated and interconnected dictatorial and chauvinist regimes: (1) the regime of the CUP, under the notorious triumvirate of the three pashas (Üç Paşalar), Talât, Enver, and Cemal, and (2) the rebel government at Samsun and Ankara, under the authority of the Grand National Assembly (Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi) and Kemal. Although the process had begun before the Balkan Wars, the final and most decisive period started immediately after WWI and ended with the almost total destruction of the Pontic Greeks
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.