Iblis

Iblis (Arabic: إِبْلِيس, romanized: Iblīs),[2] alternatively known as Eblīs,[3] is the leader of the devils (shayāṭīn) in Islam. According to the Quran, Iblis was thrown out of heaven, after he refused to prostrate himself before Adam. Regarding the origin and nature of Iblis, there are two different viewpoints.[4][5]

For the 2018 film, see Iblis (film).
The Angels meet Adam, the prototypical human being. They share, albeit to a lesser degree, the defiant reaction of Iblis, who haughtily turns his head away. Painting from a manuscript of the Manṭiq al-ṭayr (The Conference of the Birds) of Farīd al-Dīn ʿAṭṭār. Iran, Shiraz, 899/1494.[1]
Part of a series on
Islam
Beliefs
Practices
History
Culture and society
Related topics

In the first version, before Iblis was cast down from heaven, he used to be a high-ranking angel (Karub) called Azazil, appointed by God to obliterate the original disobedient and destructive inhabitants of the earth, who were replaced with humans, as more obedient creatures.[4] After Iblis objected to God's decision to create a successor (or intendance on Earth) (k̲h̲alīfa), he was punished by being relegated and cast down to earth as a shayṭān (devil).[4] In the alternative account, God created Iblis from the fires beneath the seventh earth.[4] Worshipping God for thousands of years, Iblis ascended to the surface, whereupon, thanks to his pertinacious servitude, he rose until he reached the company of Angels in the seventh heaven.[4] When God created Adam and taught him the "names of all things" , then ordered the Angels to bow down, Iblis, being a jinn created from an essence of fire, refused, by pride and feelings of superiority towards Adam (created from an essence of clay combined to a breath of life/soul), and disobeyed God. His persistence in disobediance and his oath to God to corrupt and prove the unworthiness of mankind lead to his downfall, as well as his positioning as an obvious and eternal enemy of mankind.[4]

In the Islamic tradition, Iblis is often identified with ash-Shayṭān ("the Devil"), often known by the epithet ar-Rajim (Arabic: ٱلرَّجِيْم, lit. 'the Accursed').[6] Shayṭān is usually applied to Iblis in order to denote his role as the tempter, while Iblīs is his proper name. Some Sufi Muslims uphold a more ambivalent role for Iblis, considering him not simply the Devil but actually "the truest monotheist" (because he would worship only the Creator, and not his creations) while preserving the term shayṭān exclusively for evil forces.[7][8][9]

Naming and etymology

The designation Iblīs (Arabic: إِبْلِيس) may not, in fact, be a personal name, but an epithet referencing an attribute, deriving from the Arabic verbal root BLS ب-ل-س (with the broad meaning of "remain in grief")[10] or بَلَسَ (balasa, "he despaired").[11] This is the major opinion among Arab scholars, who maintain the tradition that the personal name of this being was actually, not Iblīs, but Azazil:

"The word "إبليس" [(Iblis)] is from the root "بلس" [(BLS)]. The root may mean: to be silent. "الله رحمة من أبلس" means to be in despair of Allah's mercy, hence, the name إبليس (Iblis). His original name was Azazil. Allah has said in Surah Al-Rum "وَيَوْمَ تَقُومُ ٱلسَّاعَةُ يُبْلِسُ ٱلْمُجْرِمُونَ" (On the Day that the Hour will be established, the guilty will be struck dumb with despair). The name "Iblis" is derived from the root, بلس , as he is in despair of Allah's mercy" – Ibn Mandhur, Lisan Al-Arab, Vol.6/29[12]

Some Muslim teachers, such as al-Jili,[13] relate this name to talbis meaning confusion,[14] because God's command confused him.

Another possibility is that it is derived from Ancient Greek διάβολος (diábolos) (which is also the source of the English word 'devil') via a Syriac intermediary.[15][16] Yet another possibility relates this name to the bene ha Elohim (sons of the Elohim), who had been identified with fallen Angels in the early centuries, but had been singularized under the name of their leader.[17]

However, there is no general agreement on the root of the term. The name itself could not be found before the Quran in Arab literature,[18] but can be found in Kitab al Magall, a Christian apocryphal work written in Arabic.[17]

In Islamic traditions, Iblīs is known by many alternative names or titles, such as Abū Murrah (Arabic: أَبُو مُرَّة, "Father of Bitterness") as the name stems from the word "murr" – meaning "bitter", ‘aduww Allāh or ‘aduwallah (Arabic: عُدُوّ الله, "enemy or foe" of God)[19] and Abū Al-Harith (Arabic: أَبُو الْحَارِث, "the father of the plowmen").[20] He is also known by the nickname "Abū Kardūs" (Arabic: أَبُو كَرْدُوس), which may mean "Father who piles up, crams or crowds together".

Origin and classification

Iblis may be a fallen Angel or a jinni or a being of a nature entirely unique. This lack of final specification arises from the Quran itself,[21] while Iblis is included into the command addressed to the Angels and apparently among them, it is said he was from the jinn in Surah 18:50, whose exact meaning is debated by both Western academics and Islamic scholars. The motif of prostrating Angels with one exception among them already appeared in early Christian writings and apocalyptic literature. For this reason, one might assume Iblis was intended to be an Angel.[22] Samael might be the midrashic counterpart of Iblis. Both, created from fire, oppose God's new creation out of envy.[23] In objection to the Quran relating Iblis to the jinn, some scholars argue this to be unlikely to be the general opinion of the Quran.[24] Paul Eichler argues that, especially when the Quran calls Iblis a jinni, his creation from fire is not mentioned, while when his creation from fire is mentioned, the connection between Iblis' fire and the fire of the jinn is absent. Whenever the Quran speaks about the creation of jinn, their fire is described with special attributes (like "smokeless"), whereas Iblis' fire is never described in such a manner throughout the Quran.[24] In Ancient Near Eastern traditions, not only jinn, but also Angels, such as a Seraph, have been associated with fire.[25] Others proposed that jinni might have been a later interpolation, when both jinn and Iblis have been merged into the same category of evil spirits.[26][25] Meanwhile, Jacques Waardenburg argues, that Iblis' might have been considered an Angel first, but appears to be a jinni in later Surahs. Whereas Satan has been known to be an Angel in the Judeo-Christian tradition, Muhammad would have depicted Satan as a jinni, as a result of syncretism between monotheism and Arabian paganism, drawing a line between the Angels on God's side and the jinn on the side of the pagans.[27] The sharp distinction between Angels and Iblis is supported by the later theological doctrine of Angelic infallibility.[28] While the Angels possess no free will, it is necessary for Iblis to be an entity apart, and Iblis being a jinni explains his downfall.[29]

The idea that Iblis was not an Angel, but different, might not be an original position within Islam, but stems from the writings of Augustine of Hippo. He likewise argued that Satan and his spirits were different from the infallible Angels who remained in heaven.[30] It has been argued that supernatural creatures in the earliest Islamic tradition were not expected to deal with sin.[15]: 119–138  Accordingly, Iblis could, at that stage, not be distinguished from Angels by exercising free will in Islam's early stage, but Iblis was originally depicted as an Angel created rebellious.[15]: 119–138 

Theology

Theology (Kalām) discusses Iblis' role in the Quran and matters of free-will. Some, especially the Muʿtazila, emphasize free-will and that Iblis freely chose to disobey. Others assert that Iblis was predestined by God to disobey.[31] By that, God shows his entire Spectrum of attributes (for example; his wiliness) in the Quran, but also teaches humankind the consequences of sin and disobedience. Al-Damiri reports, most mufassir do not regard disobedience alone to be the reason for Iblis' punishment, but attributing injustice to God by objecting God's order.[32] By that, responded God in God's Attribute of Jalal (majesty). By that, Iblis distanced himself from God, since, by definition, Jalal cannot have (divine) intimacy.[33]

According to most scholars, Iblis is a mere creature and thus cannot be the cause or creator of evil in the world; in his function as a devil, he is seen only as a tempter who takes advantage of humanity's weaknesses and self-centeredness and leads them away from God's Path.[34][31] Iblis and his fellow devils can only operate with God's Permission.[35](p279) The existence of evil has been created by God Himself. The idea that God and the devil are two opposing and independent principles, has been rejected by Muslim theologians, like Maturidi, as part of pre-Islamic Iranian beliefs.[36]

Iblis also features as the progenitor of the devils, and thus referred to as the "father of the devils" (Abū ash-Shayāṭīn).[37](p129)

Quran
Depiction of Iblis in the epic poem Shahnameh

Iblis is mentioned 11 times in the Quran by name, nine times related to his refusal against God's Command to prostrate himself before Adam. The term Shaytan is more prevalent, although Iblis is sometimes referred to as Shaytan; the terms are not interchangeable. The different fragments of Iblis's story are scattered across the Quran. In the aggregate, the story can be summarised as follows:[38]

When God created Adam, He ordered the Angels to bow before the new creation. All of the Angels bowed down, but Iblis refused to do so. He argued that since he was created from fire, he is superior to humans, who were made from clay-mud, and that he should not prostrate himself before Adam.[39] As punishment for his haughtiness, God banished Iblis from heaven and condemned him to hell. Later, Iblis requested the ability to try to mislead Adam and his descendants. God granted his request but also warned him that he would have no power over God's Servants.[40]

Affiliation
Art from an Arabic manuscript of the Annals of al-Tabari showing Iblis refusing to prostrate before the newly created Adam.
Painting from a Herat manuscript of the Persian rendition by Bal'ami of the Annals/Tarikh (universal chronicle) of al-Tabari, depicting angels honoring Adam, except Iblis, who refuses. Held at the Topkapi Palace Museum Library.

There are different opinions regarding the proper meaning of "among the jinni" in the Quran. Apart from the Quranic narrative, Islamic exegesis offers two different accounts of Iblis's origin: according to one, he was a noble angel, to the other he was an ignoble jinn, who worked his way up to heaven.[5] Some also consider him to be merely the ancestor of jinn, who was created in Heaven, but fell due to his disobedience, as Adam slipped from Paradise when he sinned. It might be this moment, Iblis turned into a jinn,[41] but has been an angel created from fire before.[42]

According to exegetes of the Quran (tafsir), such as ibn Abbas,[43] Tabari,[44] Ash'ari,[45] Al-Tha`labi,[46] Al-Baydawi[42] and Mahmud al-Alusi[47] Iblis was an angel in origin. Razi describes Iblis as "one of the closest angels" (muqarrabun).[48] According to a tradition attributed to ibn Abbas and ibn Masud, in case of Iblis, the term jinn is used in reference to jannah (heaven). Accordingly, Iblis was a guardian and of a sub-category of "fiery angels". These angels, created from fire (nar), are to be distinguished by both the angels of mercy, created from light (nur), and the earthly jinn, created from "smokeless fire" (marijin min nar). Tabarsi argued that, if Iblis were a jinni, he couldn't become a custodian of paradise among the Angels.[15] Şaban Ali argues that identifying Iblis as a jinni is a mistranslation. He states, instead of "was one of the jinn", the proper translation would be, analogous to Surah 2:34, "became one of the jinn" and that Iblis has been an angel first, but became a jinn when he becomes an unbeliever.[49] The transformation of Iblis from angelic into demonic is used, by advocates of Iblis' angelic origin, as reminder of God's Capacity to reverse something even on an ontological level. It is both a warning and a reminder that the special gifts given by God can also be taken away by Him.[50]: 73 Tabari goes further in his Quran commentary, and argues against objections made against Iblis' angelic origin:

"There is nothing objectionable in that God should have created the categories of His Angels from all kinds of things that He had created: He created some of them from light, some of them from fire, and some of them from what He willed apart from that. There is thus nothing in God's Omitting to state what He created His Angels from, and in His stating what He created Iblis from, which necessarily implies that Iblis is outside of the meaning of [Angel], for it is possible that He created a category of His Angels, among whom was Iblis, from fire, and even that Iblis was unique in that He created him, and no other Angels of His, from the fire of the Samum.

Likewise, he cannot be excluded from being an Angel by fact that he had progeny or offspring, because passion and lust, from which the other Angels were free, was compounded in him when God willed disobedience in him. As for God's Statement that he was <one of the jinn>, it is not to be rejected that everything which hides itself (ijtanna) from the sight is a 'Jinn', as stated before, and Iblis and the Angels should then be among them because they hide themselves from the eyes of the sons of Adam."[51]

Hasan al-Basri is considered to be one of the first who attributed free-will to the devil and considered him to be a jinni distinct from the Angels.[52] For Asharites, angels are not extempt from sin, as they are for the Mu'tazilites. Fakhr al-Din al-Razi is an exception and agrees with the Mu'tazilites both in regards that angels are immune to error and that Iblis was not an angel. He goes further and includes to the six articles of faith not only belief in angels, but one must also believe in their infallability.[53]This view was further popularized in recent times by Umar Sulaiman Al-Ashqar in his Islamic Creed Series.[54][55]

Angelic infallibility, is one of the main-arguements for those who reject Iblis' angelic nature.[56] However, this position is not universally accepted in Islam and depends on exegetical decisions on Quranic verses, both about the nature of angels and the meaning of free will. While Hasan al Basri is known for exempting angels from all deficits,[57] Abu Hanifa is reported as distinguishing between obedient angels, disobedient angels such as Harut and Marut, and unbelievers among the angels, like Iblis.[58] For some, Iblis' disobedience is part of God's Will. God would have created Iblis, differing from the other Angels, from fire, installing a rebellious nature in him, so he will rebel and be endowed with the task to seduce humans, just as other angels are endowed with different tasks corresponding to their nature.[4]: 37 

Fate of Iblis

While the Quran sentences Iblis to hell, interpreters are undecided if Iblis is already in hell, or will be thrown into hell after the Judgement Day. Some sources describe him and his host of devils as the first who enter hell to dwell therein forever,[59] while according to others, he is already in hell. Due to the devils' creation from fire, some authors suggest they do not burn in hell, but will suffer in from intense cold (Zamharīr), instead of fire.[60] Alternatively, Iblis is killed before the Judgement Day. Among Shia Muslims, the idea prevails that the Mahdi will kill Iblis.[61] In manuals about Islamic eschatology, when Iblis is the last one on earth, the Angels of divine justice will seize and kill him.[62]

Yet others argue, that Iblis does not act upon free-will, but as an instrument of God. When Iblis is cast down to hell, he were sent to Sijjin,[63][64] and didn't ask God to spare him from punishment in hell, but requested a chance to redeem himself by proving that he is right and leading humans into sin.[65] Accordingly God makes him a tempter for humanity as long as his punishment endures. Ibn Arabi writes in his Al-Futuhat al-Makkiyya that Iblis and the devils (here: evil jinn) will say after hell ceases to be on the last day, their deeds were prescribed by God and thus not to be blamed when they tempted someone to sin.[66] Since, according to 15:36, Iblis is cursed until Day of Judgement, some writers considered Iblis being redeemable after the world perished.[67][68] His abode in hell could be a merely temporary place, lasting from his fall until the Judgement Day; and after his assignment as a tempter is over, he might return to God as one of the most cherished Angels.[68] His final salvation develops from the idea that Iblis is only an instrument of God's Anger, not due to his meritorious personality. Attar compares Iblis's damnation and salvation to the situation of Benjamin, since both were accused to show people a greater meaning, but were finally not condemned.[69]

Sufism
Adam honoured by Angels – Persian miniature. Iblis, black-faced and without hair (top-right of the picture). He refuses to prostrate himself with the other Angels.

Sufism developed another perspective on Iblis, integrating him into a greater cosmological scheme. Iblis often became, along with Muhammed, one of the two true monotheists and God's Instrument for punishment and deception. Therefore, some Sufis hold, Iblis refused to bow to Adam because he was devoted to God alone and refused to bow to anyone else. Yet not all Sufis agree with Iblis' redemption.

By weakening the evil in the Satanic figure, dualism is also degraded, that corresponds with the later Sufi cosmology of unity of existence rejecting dualistic tendencies. The belief in dualism or that "evil" is caused by something else than God, even if only by one's own will, is regarded as shirk by some Sufis.[70] For Iblis' preference to be damned to hell rather than prostrating himself before someone else other than the "Beloved" (here referring to God), Iblis also became an example for unrequited love.[71]

As a true Monotheist

Among some Sufis, a positive perspective of Iblis' refusal developed, arguing that Iblis was forced to decide between God's Command (amr) and will (irāda). Accordingly, Iblis refused to bow to Adam because he was devoted to God alone and refused to bow to anyone else. Thus Iblis would have followed the true will of God, by disobeying his command. This belief is also known as "Satan's monotheism" (tawḥīd-i Iblīs).[72]

A famous narration about an encounter between Moses and Iblis on the slopes of Sinai, told by Mansur al-Hallaj, Ruzbihan Baqli[70] and Abū Ḥāmid Ghazzali, emphasizes the nobility of Iblis. Accordingly, Moses asks Iblis why he refused God's Order. Iblis replied that the Command was actually a Test. Then Moses replied, obviously Iblis was punished by being turned from an Angel to a devil. Iblis responds, his form is just temporary but his love towards God remains the same.[73][74]

For Ahmad Ghazali, Iblis was the paragon of lovers in self sacrifice for refusing to bow down to Adam out of pure devotion to God.[71] Ahmad Ghazali's student Sheikh Adi ibn Musafir was among the Sunni Muslim mystics who defended Iblis, asserted that evil was also God's Creation, Sheikh Adi argued that if evil existed without the Will of God then God would be powerless and a powerless being can't be God.[75]

Keeper of Paradise

Although in the Quran, Iblis appears only with his fall and intention to mislead God's Creation, another role, as the gatekeeper of the divine essence, developed, probably based on the oral reports of the Sahaba. In some interpretations, Iblis is associated with light that misleads people. Hasan of Basra was quoted as saying: "If Iblis were to reveal his light to mankind, they would worship him as a God."[76] Additionally, based on Iblis' role as keeper of heaven and ruler of earth, Ayn al-Quzat Hamadani stated, Iblis represents the "Dark light" that is the earthen world, standing in opposite to the Muhammadan Light that represents the heavens.[77] As such, Iblis would be the treasurer and judge to differentiate between the sinners and the believers. Quzat Hamadani traces back his interpretation to Sahl al-Tustari and Shayban Ar-Ra'i who in return claim to derive their opinions from Khidr.[77] Quzat Hamadani relates his interpretation of Iblis' light to the shahada: Accordingly, people whose service for God is just superficial, are trapped within the circle of la ilah (the first part of shahada meaning "there is no God") just worshipping their nafs (bodily urges) rather than God. Only those who are worthy to leave this circle can pass Iblis towards the circle of illa Allah, the "Divine presence".

Rejecting apologetics

However, not all Sufis are in agreement with a positive depiction of Iblis. In Ibn Ghanim's retelling of the encounter between Iblis and Moses, Iblis does not truly offer an excuse for his disobedience. Instead, Iblis' arguments brought forth against Moses are nothing but a sham and subtly deception to make Sufis doubt the authenticity of their own spiritual path.[78] Ruzbihan Baqli, too, seems to be critical of Iblis', asserting that his apologetics are mere inventions to claim innocence. In this context, al-Baqli calls Iblis the master of religious deception and father of lies.[79]

In Rumi's Masnavi Book 2, Iblis wakes Mu'awiya up for prayer. Doubting any good intentions from Satan, Mu'awiya starts arguing with Iblis and asking him about his true intentions. Iblis uses several arguments to proof his own innocence: being a former archAngel[80] who would never truly abandon God; being merely a tempter who just brings forth the evil in the sinners, to distinguish them from true believers, but is not evil himself; God's Omnipotence and that Iblis' sin ultimate results in God's Judgement.[81][82] Mu'awiya fails to stand against Iblis with reason and seeks refuge in God. Finally, Iblis confesses, he only woke him up, for missing a prayer and causing Mu'awiya to repent, would bring him closer to God than praying.[82] Rumi rejects the idea of "Satan's monotheism" (tawḥīd-i Iblīs) asserted by many other Sufis, as his argument, that Iblis was an Angel first, doesn't excuse him.[83]

Rumi views Iblis as the manifestation of the great sins of haughtiness and envy. He states: "(Cunning) intelligence is from Iblis, and love from Adam."[84] For Shah Waliullah Dehlawi, Iblis represents the principle of "one-eyed" intellect; he only saw the outward earthly form of Adam, but was blind to the Divine spark hidden in him, using an illicit method of comparison.[85]

Hasan of Basra holds that Iblis was the first who used "analogy", comparing himself to someone else, this causing his sin. Therefore, Iblis also represents humans' psyche moving towards sin or shows how love can cause envy and anxiety.[86]

In tradition
Painting of the expulsion from "The Garden" by Al-Hakim Nishapuri. The main actors of the narration about Adam's fall are drawn: Adam, Hawwa (Eve), Iblis, the serpent, the peacock and an Angel, probably Ridwan, who guards paradise.
This painting is from a copy of the Fālnāmeh (Book of Omens) ascribed to Ja´far al-Sādiq. Iblis characteristically depicted black-faced is bottom-left in picture above the Angels.

Iblis as djinn

Most stories regarding Iblis consider him to be involved in a battle between Angels and jinn.[87] However, opinions differ on whether Iblis was one of the Angels or of the jinn during the battle. From the opinions that Iblis as a jinn, is supposed to have lived on earth before the creation of humans.[87] When the Angels arrived to battle the jinn, they took prisoners, among them Iblis, and were carried to heaven.[87] Since he, unlike the other jinn, was pious, the Angels were impressed by his nobility, and Iblis was allowed to join the company of Angels and elevated to their rank. Although he got the outer appearance of an Angel, he was still a jinn in essence, and thus able to disobey God later.[88]

He was then sentenced to hell forever, but God granted him a favor for his former worship, that is to take revenge on humans by attempting to mislead them until the Day of Judgment.

Iblis as angel
Ottoman miniature depicting Iblis as a dark, bearded man wearing a headdress. Siyah Qalam, c. 15th–16th century, Topkapı Palace.
See also: Azazil

Other scholar traditions considering Iblis being an Angel, often describe him as an archangel (malak al-muqarrab),[89][90][91] called Azazil. According to this story, Azazil/Iblis was the leader and Imam (teacher) of the Angels, and became a guardian of heaven. At the same time, he was the closest to the Throne of God. God gave him authority over the lower heavens and the earth. When God sent the Angels to earth to battle the jinn, Azazil/Iblis and his army drove the jinn to the edge of the world, Mount Qaf.

Knowing about the corruption of the former earthen inhabitants, Iblis protested, when he was instructed to prostrate himself before the new earthen inhabitant, that is Adam. He assumed that the Angels who praise God's Glory day and night are superior in contrast to the mud-made humans and their bodily flaws.[92] He even regarded himself superior in comparison to the other Angels, since he was (one of those) created from fire. However, he was degraded and sentenced to hell (Sijjin),[63] by God for his arrogance.

Iblis is said to had four wings. After he was cursed, his form turned from that of an Angel into a devil. God transformed his neck to that of a pig, and his head into that of a camel. His eyes are stretched all over his face, and canines the fangs of a boar. From his beard, only seven hairs grow.[93]

After he was cast out from among the Angels, God made him able to beget children. God aroused hatred within Iblis, so that a spark of fire emanated from him. From this spark of fire (samum), God created Iblis' wife. In other traditions, God made Iblis hermaphrodite, and Iblis begot offspring by himself alone.[94]

Qisas al-Anbiya

According to the Stories of the Prophets, to enter the abode of Adam in garden Eden, Iblis uses the biblical serpent to sneak in. The garden is watched by an Angelic guardian. He invents a plan to trick him and approaches a peacock and tells him that all creatures are destined to die and thus the peacock's beauty will perish. But if he gets the fruit of eternity, he could make every creature immortal. Therefore, the peacock persuades the serpent to slip Iblis into the Garden, by carrying him in his mouth. In similar narration, Iblis is warded off by Riḍwan's burning sword for 100 years. Then he found the serpent. He says since he was one of the first cherub, he will one day return to God's Grace and Promises to show gratitude if the serpent does him a favor.[95] In both narratives, in the Garden, Iblis speaks through the serpent to Adam and Eve, and tricks them into eating from the forbidden tree.

Modern Muslims accuse the Yazidis of devil-worship for venerating the peacock.[96] The image of the biblical serpent might derive from Gnostic and Jewish oral tradition circulating in the Arabian Peninsula,[97]

Iconography
Further information: Angels in art § Islamic art
Another painting of Angels prostrating before Adam with Iblis refusing, here depicted with a headcover

Iblis is perhaps one of the most well-known individual supernatural entities and was depicted in multiple visual representations like the Quran and Manuscripts of Bal‘ami’s ‘Tarjamah-i Tarikh-i Tabari.[98] Iblis was a unique individual, described as both a pious jinn and at times an Angel before he fell from God's Grace when he refused to bow before the prophet Adam. After this incident, Iblis turned into a shaytan.[99] In visual appearance, Iblis was depicted in On the Monstrous in the Islamic Visual Tradition by Francesca Leoni as a being with a human-like body with flaming eyes, a tail, claws, and large horns on a grossly disproportionate large head.[100]

Illustrations of Iblis in Islamic paintings often depict him black-faced, a feature which would later symbolize any satanic figure or heretic, and with a black body, to symbolize his corrupted nature. Another common depiction of Iblis shows him wearing a special head covering, clearly different from the traditional Islamic turban. In one painting, however, Iblis wears a traditional Islamic head covering.[101] The turban probably refers to a narration of Iblis' fall: there he wore a turban, then he was sent down from heaven.[102] Many other pictures show and describe Iblis at the moment, when the Angels prostrate themselves before Adam. Here, he is usually seen beyond the outcrop, his face transformed with his wings burned, to the envious countenance of a devil.[103] Iblis and his cohorts (div or shayatin) are often portrayed in Turko-Persian art as bangled creatures with flaming eyes, only covered by a short skirt. Similar to European arts, who took traits of pagan deities to depict devils, they depicted such demons often in a similar fashion to that of Hindu-deities.[104]

As a muse

During the early Abbaside period, Iblis might have been an inspirational figure, some sort of musical patron, for anti-religious poets and hedonists, such as al-Walid.[105] In Muslim culture, it is said some people had befriended Iblis as a muse. Hilal al-Kufi (end of the seventh century) was nicknamed "companion of Iblis" (sahib Iblis). Abu al-Fadl Muhammad al Tabasi frequently invokes Iblis (or Azazil) and his progeny in his Medieval encyclopedia of magic.[106] Iblis is further said to approach dying people to tempt them away from Islam in exchange for their life. According to the Islamic Book of the Dead, Iblis in disguise approaches a thirsty man with a cup of water, but only handing him water over, if he testifies "two gods", "no one formed the universe" or "the Messenger, peace be upon him, lied".[107]

Iblis posessed an ability to shapeshift, as narrated by Hadiths which given commentaries by Tabari, which noded by Ibn Taymiyya, where Iblis was once taking form of Suraqa ibn Malik, and take sides with the polytheists during the Battle of Badr.[87]

In literature

In Vathek by the English novelist William Beckford, first composed in French (1782), the protagonists enter the underworld, presented as the domain of Iblis. At the end of their journey, they meet Iblis in person, who is described less in the monstrous image of Dante's Satan, but more of a young man, whose regular features are tarnished, his eyes showing both pride and despair and his hair resembling whose of an Angel of light.[108]

In Muhammad Iqbal's poetry, Iblis is critical about overstressed obedience, which caused his downfall. But Iblis is not happy about humanity's obedience towards himself either; rather he longs for humans who resist him, so he might eventually prostrate himself before the perfect human, which leads to his salvation.[109]

Egyptian novelist Tawfiq al-Hakim's ash-Shahid (1953) describes the necessity of Iblis's evil for the world, telling about a fictional story, Iblis seeking repentance. He consults the Pope and the chief Rabbi. Both reject him and he afterward visits the grand mufti of Al-Azhar Mosque, telling him he wants to embrace Islam. The grand mufti, however, rejects Iblis as well, realizing the necessity of Iblis' evilness. Regarding the absence of Iblis' evil, as causing most of the Quran to be obsolete. After that Iblis goes to heaven to ask Gabriel for intercession. Gabriel too rejects Iblis and explains the necessity for Iblis's curse. Otherwise, God's Light could not be seen on earth. Whereupon Iblis descends from heaven shouting out: "I am a martyr!".[110] Al-Hakim's story has been criticized as blasphemous by several Islamic scholars. Salafi scholar Abu Ishaq al-Heweny stated: "I swear by God it would never cross the mind, at all, that this absolute kufr reaches this level, and that it gets published as a novel".[111]

See also

References
  1. Kuehn, Sara. "The Primordial Cycle Revisited: Adam, Eve, and the Celestial Beings." The intermediate worlds of angels (2019): 173-199.
  2. Gardet, Louis; Wensinck, A. J. (1971). "Iblīs". In Bosworth, C. E.; van Donzel, E. J.; Heinrichs, W. P.; Lewis, B.; Pellat, Ch.; Schacht, J. (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam, Second Edition. Vol. 3. Leiden: Brill Publishers. doi:10.1163/1573-3912_islam_SIM_3021. ISBN 978-90-04-16121-4.
  3. Briggs, Constance Victoria (2003). The Encyclopedia of God: An A-Z Guide to Thoughts, Ideas, and Beliefs about God. Newburyport, Massachusetts: Hampton Roads. ISBN 978-1-612-83225-8.
  4. Awn, Peter J. (1983). "Mythic Biography". Satan's Tragedy and Redemption: Iblīs in Sufi Psychology. Numen Book Series. Vol. 44. Leiden and Boston: Brill Publishers. pp. 18–56. doi:10.1163/9789004378636_003. ISBN 978-90-04-37863-6.
  5. Mahmoud, Muhammad (1995). "The Creation Story in 'Sūrat al-Baqara,' with Special Reference to al-Ṭabarī's Material: An Analysis". Journal of Arabic Literature. 26 (1/2): 201–214. doi:10.1163/157006495X00175. JSTOR 4183374.
  6. Silverstein, Adam J. (January–March 2013). "On the Original Meaning of the Qurʾanic Term ash-Shayṭān ar-Rajīm". Journal of the American Oriental Society. American Oriental Society. 133 (1): 21–33. doi:10.7817/jameroriesoci.133.1.0021. LCCN 12032032. OCLC 47785421.
  7. Awn, Peter J. (1983). "Iblīs: Model of the Mystic Man". Satan's Tragedy and Redemption: Iblīs in Sufi Psychology. Numen Book Series. Vol. 44. Leiden and Boston: Brill Publishers. pp. 122–183. doi:10.1163/9789004378636_005. ISBN 978-90-04-37863-6.
  8. Rustom, Mohammed (September 2020). Touati, Houari (ed.). "Devil's Advocate: ʿAyn al-Quḍāt's Defence of Iblis in Context". Studia Islamica. Leiden and Boston: Brill Publishers. 115 (1): 65–100. doi:10.1163/19585705-12341408. S2CID 226540873.
  9. Campanini, Massimo (2013). The Qur'an: The Basics. Abingdon, England: Routledge. ISBN 978-1-1386-6630-6.
  10. Kazim, Ebrahim (2010). Scientific Commentary of Suratul Faateḥah. New Delhi, India: Pharos Media & Publishing Pvt Ltd. p. 274. ISBN 978-8-172-21037-3.
  11. "Iblis".
  12. ZenEldeen, Zakaria Sobhi. "Dangers and Treatment of Hypocrites' Rumors Thematic Analytical Study." مجلة الجامعة الإسلامية للدراسات الإسلامية (عقيدة-تفسير-حديث) 29.1 (2021).
  13. Abu-Zaid, Nasr. "The Perfect Man in Islam: A Textual Analysis." 大阪外国語大学学報 77 (1989): 111–133.
  14. Nicholson, Reynold A. (1998). Studies In Islamic Mysticism. Abingdon, England: Routledge. p. 120. ISBN 978-1-136-17178-9.
  15. Basharin, Pavel V. (April 1, 2018). "The Problem of Free Will and Predestination in the Light of Satan's Justification in Early Sufism". English Language Notes. Durham, North Carolina: Duke University Press. 56 (1): 119–138. doi:10.1215/00138282-4337480. S2CID 165366613.
  16. Wensinck, A.J.; Gardet, L. "Iblīs". In Bearman, P.; Bianquis, Th.; Bosworth, C.E.; van Donzel, E.; Heinrichs, W.P. (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam (2nd ed.). doi:10.1163/1573-3912_islam_SIM_3021. ISBN 978-90-04-16121-4.
  17. Monferrer-Sala, Juan Pedro (2012). "One More Time on the Arabized Nominal Form Iblīs". Studia Orientalia Electronica. 112: 55–70.
  18. Russell, Jeffrey Burton (1986). Lucifer: The Devil in the Middle Ages. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. p. 55. ISBN 978-0-801-49429-1.
  19. "Iblis | Meaning, Name, & Significance".
  20. Zadeh, Travis (2014). "Commanding Demons and Jinn: The Sorcerer in Early Islamic Thought". In Korangy, Alireza; Sheffield, Dan (eds.). No Tapping around Philology: A Festschrift in Honor of Wheeler McIntosh Thackston Jr.'s 70th Birthday. Wiesbaden, Germany: Harrassowitz Verlag. p. 149. ISBN 978-3447102155.
  21. Nünlist, Tobias (2015). Dämonenglaube im Islam (in German). Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter. p. 51. ISBN 978-3-110-33168-4.
  22. Jeffrey Burton Russell Lucifer: The Devil in the Middle Ages Cornell University Press, 1986 ISBN 9780801494291 p. 56
  23. Mark, Jan. "Adventures among the Midrashim." Signal 86 (1998): 117.
  24. Eichler, Paul Arno, 1889–Die Dschinn, Teufel und Engel in Koran p. 60
  25. Dammen McAuliffe, Jane (2003). Encyclopaedia of the Qurʼān. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Publishers. p. 46. ISBN 978-9004147645.
  26. Russell, Jeffrey Burton (1986). Lucifer: The Devil in the Middle Ages. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press. p. 56. ISBN 978-0-801-49429-1.
  27. Jacques Waardenburg Islam: Historical, Social, and Political Perspectives Walter de Gruyter, 2008 ISBN 978-3-110-20094-2 p. 40
  28. Nünlist, page 54
  29. Nünlist, page 54
  30. Jung, Leo. "Fallen Angels in Jewish, Christian and Mohammedan Literature. A Study in Comparative Folk-lore." The Jewish quarterly review 16.1 (1925): 45–88.
  31. Lange, Christian. "Devil (Satan)". In Fleet, Kate; Krämer, Gudrun; Matringe, Denis; Nawas, John; Rowson, Everett (eds.). Encyclopaedia of Islam. doi:10.1163/1573-3912_ei3_COM_25991. ISBN 978-90-04-35666-5.
  32. Sharpe, Elizabeth Marie Into the realm of smokeless fire: (Qur'an 55:14): A critical translation of al-Damiri's article on the jinn from "Hayat al-Hayawan al-Kubra 1953 The University of Arizona download date: 15/03/2020
  33. The Shari'a: History, Ethics and Law. (2018). Vereinigtes Königreich: Bloomsbury Publishing. p. 92
  34. Mathewes, Charles (2010). Understanding Religious Ethics. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. p. 248. ISBN 978-1-405-13351-7.
  35. Young, M. J. L. (1966). "The Treatment of the Principle of Evil in the Qur'ān". Islamic Studies. 5 (3): 275–281. JSTOR 20832847.
  36. Jacques Waardenburg MUSLIM PERCEPTIONS of OTHER RELIGIONS New York Oxford OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS 1999 ISBN 0-19-510472-2 p. 203
  37. Egdunas Racius "Islamic exegesis on the jinn: Their origin, kinds and substance and their relationship to other beings"
  38. Awn, Peter J. (1983). Satan's Tragedy and Redemption: Iblīs in Sufi Psychology. Leiden, the Netherlands: Brill. p. 18. ISBN 978-9-0040-6906-0.
  39. Quran 7:12
  40. Quran 17:65— ˹Allah added,˺ “You will truly have no authority over My ˹faithful˺ servants.” And sufficient is your Lord as a Guardian.
  41. Hughes, Patrick; Hughes, Thomas Patrick (1995). Dictionary of Islam. New Delhi, India: Asian Educational Services. p. 135. ISBN 978-8-120-60672-2.
  42. Vicchio, page 183
  43. Öztürk, Mustafa. "The Tragic Story of Iblis (Satan) in the Qur’an." Journal of Islamic Research 2.2 (2009): 128-144: "Ibn Abbas relates, Iblis in fact belongs to a tribe involved in the family of angels called Jinn, this tribe is created from poisonous fire and the other angels from light
  44. Wheeler, Brannon M. (2002). Prophets in the Quran: An Introduction to the Quran and Muslim Exegesis. London, England: A&C Black. p. 16. ISBN 978-0-826-44957-3.
  45. Palacios, Miguel Asin (2013). Islam and the Divine Comedy. Abingdon, England: Routledge. p. 109. ISBN 978-1-134-53643-6.
  46. "IBLIS". doi:10.1163/1573-3912_islam_SIM_3021. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  47. Fr. Edmund Teuma THE NATURE OF "IBLI$H IN THE QUR'AN AS INTERPRETED BY THE COMMENTATORS 1980 University of Malta. Faculty of Theology
  48. Schöck, C. (2021). Adam im Islam. Deutschland: De Gruyter. p. 98
  49. DÜZGÜN, Şaban Ali. "DİNSEL ve MİTOLOJİK YÖNLERİYLE CİN ve ŞEYTAN ALGIMIZ." p. 15
  50. Gauvain, Richard (2013). Salafi Ritual Purity: In the Presence of God. Abingdon, England, the U.K.: Routledge. pp. 69–74. ISBN 978-0-7103-1356-0.
  51. "القرآن الكريم – تفسير الطبري – تفسير سورة البقرة – الآية 34". Archived from the original on 2013-06-29.
  52. Omar Hamdan Studien zur Kanonisierung des Korantextes: al-Ḥasan al-Baṣrīs Beiträge zur Geschichte des Korans Otto Harrassowitz Verlag 2006 ISBN 978-3447053495 pp. 291–292 (German)
  53. Street, Tony. "Medieval Islamic doctrine on the angels: the writings of Fakhr al-Dīh al-Rāzī." Parergon 9.2 (1991): 111-127.
  54. Umar Sulaiman al-Ashqar. JinnDevils (Paperback). Islamkotob. p. 17. Retrieved 24 July 2023.
  55. Jeremy Boulter (1998). the return of jesus part 3 of 5 (Paperback). Islamkotob. Retrieved 24 July 2023.
  56. El-Zein, page 46
  57. Omar Hamdan Studien Zur Kanonisierung des Korantextes: al-Ḥasan al-Baṣrīs Beiträge Zur Geschichte des Korans Otto Harrassowitz Verlag 2006 ISBN 978-3-447-05349-5 page 293 (German)
  58. Masood Ali Khan, Shaikh Azhar Iqbal Encyclopaedia of Islam: Religious doctrine of Islam Commonwealth, 2005 ISBN 9788131100523 p. 153
  59. Lange, Christian (2015). Paradise and Hell in Islamic Traditions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. p. 141. ISBN 978-1-316-41205-3.
  60. Palacios, M. A. (2013). Islam and the Divine Comedy. Vereinigtes Königreich: Taylor & Francis. p. 109
  61. Idelman Smith, Jane; Yazbeck Haddad, Yvonne (2002). The Islamic Understanding of Death and Resurrection. Oxfordshire, England: Oxford University Press. p. 86. ISBN 978-0-198-03552-7.
  62. MacDonald, John (1966). "The day of resurrection". Islamic Studies. 5 (2): 129–197. JSTOR 20832837.
  63. Syria in Crusader Times: Conflict and Co-Existence. (2020). Vereinigtes Königreich: Edinburgh University Press.
  64. Rosenwein, B. H., Gertsman, E. (2018). The Middle Ages in 50 Objects. Indien: Cambridge University Press. p. 103
  65. Elias, Jamal J. (2014). Key Themes for the Study of Islam. London, England: Oneworld Publications. p. 86. ISBN 978-1-780-74684-5.
  66. Gallorini, Louise (30 April 2021). The Symbolic Function of Angels in the Qur'ān and Sufi Literature (Thesis). hdl:10938/22446.
  67. Nicholson, Reynold A.. Studies in Islamic Mysticism. N.p., Taylor & Francis, 2003. p. 90
  68. Schimmel, Annemarie (1963). Gabriel's Wing: A Study Into the Religious Ideas of Sir Muhammad Iqbal. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Publishers. p. 212. ISBN 978-9694160122.
  69. Awn, Peter J. (1983). Satan's Tragedy and Redemption: Iblīs in Sufi Psychology. Leiden, Germany: Brill Publishers. p. 177 ISBN 978-9004069060.
  70. Awn, page 104
  71. Ghorban Elmi (November 2019). "Ahmad Ghazali's Satan". Retrieved 14 September 2020.
  72. Rustom, Mohammed. "Devil’s Advocate: ʿAyn al-Quḍāt’s Defence of Iblis in Context." Studia Islamica 115.1 (2020): 65–100.
  73. Gramlich, Richard (1998). Der eine Gott: Grundzüge der Mystik des islamischen Monotheismus (in German). Weisbaden, Germany: Otto Harrassowitz Verlag. p. 44. ISBN 978-3-447-04025-9.
  74. Lumbard, Joseph E. B.; al-Ghazali, Ahmad (2016). Remembrance, and the Metaphysics of Love. Albany, New York: SUNY Press. pp. 111–112. ISBN 978-1-438-45966-0.
  75. Victoria Arakelova, Garnik S.Asatrian (2014). The Religion of the Peacock angel The Yezidis and their spirit world. Routledge. p. 38. ISBN 978-1-84465-761-2.
  76. Ernst, Carl W. (1985). Words of Ecstasy in Sufism. Albany, New York: SUNY Press. p. 8. ISBN 978-0873959186.
  77. Günther, Sebastian; Lawson, Todd (2016). Roads to Paradise: Eschatology and Concepts of the Hereafter in Islam. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Publishers. p. 569. ISBN 978-9-004-33315-4.
  78. Awn, page 131
  79. Awn, page 132
  80. SHAH, PORTRAYED IN SHAH TAHMASP’S. "TWIN SPIRITS ANGELS AND DEVILS PORTRAYED IN SHAH TAHMASP’S SHAH NAMEH DUNCAN HALDANE." Paradise and Hell in Islam (2012): 42.
  81. Dévényi, Kinga, and Alexander Fodor, eds. Proceedings of the Colloquium on Paradise and Hell in Islam, Keszthely, 7–14 July 2002. Eotvos Lorand University, Chair for Arabic Studies & Csoma de Koros Society, Section of Islamic Studies, 2008.
  82. Hodgson, M. G. S. (2009). The Venture of Islam, Volume 2: The Expansion of Islam in the Middle Periods. Vereinigtes Königreich: University of Chicago Press. p. 253
  83. Rustom, Mohammed. "Devil’s Advocate: ʿAyn al-Quḍāt’s Defence of Iblis in Context." Studia Islamica 115.1 (2020): 65–100.
  84. Schimmel, Annemarie (1993). The Triumphal Sun: A Study of the Works of Jalaloddin Rumi. Albany, New York: SUNY Press. p. 255. ISBN 978-0-791-41635-8.
  85. Allāh al-Dihlawī, Walī (1996). Shāh Walī Allāh of Delhi's Hujjat Allāh Al-bāligha. Albany, New York: Brill Publishers. p. 350. ISBN 978-9-004-10298-9.
  86. ad-Dīn Muhammad Rūmī, Jalāl (2005). "The Step Into Placelessness". Collected Poetical Works of Rumi. Boulder, Colorado: Shambhala Publications. p. 51. ISBN 978-1590302514.
  87. Abd El-Rahaman, Nael (2017). "A comparison of doctrine of Satan in the Bible and the Qur'an". Master of Arts -- Acadia University. [Wolfville, Nova Scotia] : Acadia University: 89–97. OCLC 1224180570. Retrieved 2 September 2023.
  88. Unal, Ali (2008). The Qur'an with Annotated Interpretation in Modern English. Clifton, New Jersey: Tughra Books. p. 29. ISBN 978-1-597-84144-3.
  89. Hafiz and the Religion of Love in Classical Persian Poetry. (2010). Vereinigtes Königreich: I.B.Tauris.
  90. Muhammed, John (June 1966). "The Day of Resurrection". Islamic Studies. Islamabad, Pakistan: Islamic Research Institute. 5 (2): 136.
  91. Houtsma, M. Th.; Arnold, Russel; Gibb, Camilla, eds. (1987). E.J. Brill's First Encyclopaedia of Islam 1913–1936. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Publishers. p. 351. ISBN 978-9-004-08265-6.
  92. Hampson Stobart, James William (1876). Islam & Its Founder. Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge. Oxfordshire, England: Oxford University. p. 114.
  93. Title: Der Teufel in der modernen arabischen Literatur (The Devil in modern Arabic literature) Band 118 by Islamkundliche Untersuchungen Author Khalil Shaikh Publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2021 ISBN 978-3-11-240081-4 pages 283 pages, p. 30
  94. Title: Der Teufel in der modernen arabischen Literatur (The Devil in modern Arabic literature) Band 118 by Islamkundliche Untersuchungen Author Khalil Shaikh Publisher Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG, 2021 ISBN 978-3-11-240081-4 pages 283 pages, p. 30
  95. Shabaz, Absalom D. (1904). Land of the Lion and the Sun: Personal Experiences, the Nations of Persia-their Manners, Customs, and Their Belief. New Haven, Connecticut: Harvard University. p. 96.
  96. Açikyildiz, Birgül (2014). The Yezidis: The History of a Community, Culture and Religion. London, England: I.B. Tauris. p. 161. ISBN 978-0-857-72061-0.
  97. El-Zein, pages 98–99
  98. Leoni, Francesca (2012). On the Monstrous in the Islamic Visual Tradition. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing. pp. 153–154.
  99. Leoni, Francesca (2012). On the Monstrous in the Islamic Visual Tradition. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing. p. 3.
  100. Leoni, Francesca (2012). On the Monstrous in the Islamic Visual Tradition. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing. pp. 5–6.
  101. Brosh, Na'ama; Milstein, Rachel; Yiśraʼel, Muzeʼon (1991). Biblical stories in Islamic painting. Jerusalem: Israel Museum. p. 27. ASIN B0006F66PC.
  102. ibn Muḥammad Thaʻlabī, Aḥmad; Brinner, William M. (2002). ʻArāʻis al-majālis fī qiṣaṣ al-anbiyā, or: Lives of the prophets, Band 24. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Publishers. p. 69. ISBN 978-9-004-12589-6.
  103. Melion, Walter; Zell, Michael; Woodall, Joanna (2017). Ut pictura amor: The Reflexive Imagery of Love in Artistic Theory and Practice, 1500–1700. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Publishers. p. 240. ISBN 978-9-004-34646-8.
  104. L. Lewisohn, C. Shackle Attar and the Persian Sufi Tradition: The Art of Spiritual Flight Bloomsbury Publishing, 22.11.2006 ISBN 9781786730183 p. 156-158
  105. Fowden, G. (2004). Quṣayr ʻAmra: Art and the Umayyad Elite in Late Antique Syria. Ukraine: University of California Press. p. 174
  106. Abu al-Fadl Muhammad al Tabasi
  107. Werner, Helmut (2014-07-21). Das islamische Totenbuch (in German). Edition Lempertz. ISBN 978-3-943883-95-4.
  108. Roderick Cavaliero Ottomania: The Romantics and the Myth of the Islamic Orient Bloomsbury Publishing, 02.07.2010 ISBN 9780857715401 p. 66
  109. Awn, page 9
  110. Arndt Graf, Schirin Fathi, Ludwig Paul Orientalism and Conspiracy: Politics and Conspiracy Theory in the Islamic World Bloomsbury Publishing 30.11.2010 ISBN 9780857719140 p. 219-221
  111. Islam Issa Milton in the Arab-Muslim World Taylor & Francis 2016 ISBN 978-1-317-09592-7 page 94
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.