Indoor positioning system

An indoor positioning system (IPS) is a network of devices used to locate people or objects where GPS and other satellite technologies lack precision or fail entirely, such as inside multistory buildings, airports, alleys, parking garages, and underground locations.[1]

For broader coverage of this topic, see Positioning system.
An indoor location tracking map on a mobile phone

A large variety of techniques and devices are used to provide indoor positioning ranging from reconfigured devices already deployed such as smartphones, WiFi and Bluetooth antennas, digital cameras, and clocks; to purpose built installations with relays and beacons strategically placed throughout a defined space. Lights, radio waves, magnetic fields, acoustic signals, and behavioral analytics are all used in IPS networks.[2][3] IPS can achieve position accuracy of 2 cm,[4] which is on par with RTK enabled GNSS receivers that can achieve 2 cm accuracy outdoors.[5] IPS use different technologies, including distance measurement to nearby anchor nodes (nodes with known fixed positions, e.g. WiFi / LiFi access points, Bluetooth beacons or Ultra-Wideband beacons), magnetic positioning, dead reckoning.[6] They either actively locate mobile devices and tags or provide ambient location or environmental context for devices to get sensed.[7][8][9] The localized nature of an IPS has resulted in design fragmentation, with systems making use of various optical,[10] radio,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17] or even acoustic[18][19] technologies.

IPS has broad applications in commercial, military, retail, and inventory tracking industries. There are several commercial systems on the market, but no standards for an IPS system. Instead each installation is tailored to spatial dimensions, building materials, accuracy needs, and budget constraints.

For smoothing to compensate for stochastic (unpredictable) errors there must be a sound method for reducing the error budget significantly. The system might include information from other systems to cope for physical ambiguity and to enable error compensation. Detecting the device's orientation (often referred to as the compass direction in order to disambiguate it from smartphone vertical orientation) can be achieved either by detecting landmarks inside images taken in real time, or by using trilateration with beacons.[20] There also exist technologies for detecting magnetometric information inside buildings or locations with steel structures or in iron ore mines.[21]

Applicability and precision

Due to the signal attenuation caused by construction materials, the satellite based Global Positioning System (GPS) loses significant power indoors affecting the required coverage for receivers by at least four satellites. In addition, the multiple reflections at surfaces cause multi-path propagation serving for uncontrollable errors. These very same effects are degrading all known solutions for indoor locating which uses electromagnetic waves from indoor transmitters to indoor receivers. A bundle of physical and mathematical methods are applied to compensate for these problems. Promising direction radio frequency positioning error correction opened by the use of alternative sources of navigational information, such as inertial measurement unit (IMU), monocular camera Simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) and WiFi SLAM. Integration of data from various navigation systems with different physical principles can increase the accuracy and robustness of the overall solution.[22]

The U.S. Global Positioning System (GPS) and other similar Global navigation satellite systems (GNSS) are generally not suitable to establish indoor locations, since microwaves will be attenuated and scattered by roofs, walls and other objects. However, in order to make the positioning signals become ubiquitous, integration between GPS and indoor positioning can be made.[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]

Currently, GNSS receivers are becoming more and more sensitive due to increasing microchip processing power. High Sensitivity GNSS receivers are able to receive satellite signals in most indoor environments and attempts to determine the 3D position indoors have been successful.[31] Besides increasing the sensitivity of the receivers, the technique of A-GPS is used, where the almanac and other information are transferred through a mobile phone.

However, despite the fact that proper coverage for the required four satellites to locate a receiver is not achieved with all current designs (2008–11) for indoor operations, GPS emulation has been deployed successfully in Stockholm metro.[32] GPS coverage extension solutions have been able to provide zone-based positioning indoors, accessible with standard GPS chipsets like the ones used in smartphones.[32]

Types of usage

Locating and positioning

While most current IPS are able to detect the location of an object, they are so coarse that they cannot be used to detect the orientation or direction of an object.[33]

Locating and tracking
See also: Waypoint and point of interest

One of the methods to thrive for sufficient operational suitability is "tracking". Whether a sequence of locations determined form a trajectory from the first to the most actual location. Statistical methods then serve for smoothing the locations determined in a track resembling the physical capabilities of the object to move. This smoothing must be applied, when a target moves and also for a resident target, to compensate erratic measures. Otherwise the single resident location or even the followed trajectory would compose of an itinerant sequence of jumps.

Identification and segregation

In most applications the population of targets is larger than just one. Hence the IPS must serve a proper specific identification for each observed target and must be capable to segregate and separate the targets individually within the group. An IPS must be able to identify the entities being tracked, despite the "non-interesting" neighbors. Depending on the design, either a sensor network must know from which tag it has received information, or a locating device must be able to identify the targets directly.

Wireless technologies

Any wireless technology can be used for locating. Many different systems take advantage of existing wireless infrastructure for indoor positioning. There are three primary system topology options for hardware and software configuration, network-based, terminal-based, and terminal-assisted. Positioning accuracy can be increased at the expense of wireless infrastructure equipment and installations.

Wi-Fi-based positioning system (WPS)
Main article: Wi-Fi positioning system
Further information: Wi-Fi Round Trip Time

Wi-Fi positioning system (WPS) is used where GPS is inadequate. The localization technique used for positioning with wireless access points is based on measuring the intensity of the received signal (received signal strength in English RSS) and the method of "fingerprinting".[34][35][36][37] To increase the accuracy of fingerprinting methods, statistical post-processing techniques (like Gaussian process theory) can be applied, to transform discrete set of "fingerprints" to a continuous distribution of RSSI of each access point over entire location.[38][39][40] Typical parameters useful to geolocate the Wi-Fi hotspot or wireless access point include the SSID and the MAC address of the access point. The accuracy depends on the number of positions that have been entered into the database. The possible signal fluctuations that may occur can increase errors and inaccuracies in the path of the user.[41][42]

Bluetooth

Originally, Bluetooth was concerned about proximity, not about exact location.[43] Bluetooth was not intended to offer a pinned location like GPS, however is known as a geo-fence or micro-fence solution which makes it an indoor proximity solution, not an indoor positioning solution.

Micromapping and indoor mapping[44] has been linked to Bluetooth[45] and to the Bluetooth LE based iBeacon promoted by Apple Inc. Large-scale indoor positioning system based on iBeacons has been implemented and applied in practice.[46][47]

Bluetooth speaker position and home networks can be used for broad reference.

Choke point concepts

Simple concept of location indexing and presence reporting for tagged objects, uses known sensor identification only.[16] This is usually the case with passive radio-frequency identification (RFID) / NFC systems, which do not report the signal strengths and various distances of single tags or of a bulk of tags and do not renew any before known location coordinates of the sensor or current location of any tags. Operability of such approaches requires some narrow passage to prevent from passing by out of range.

Grid concepts

Instead of long range measurement, a dense network of low-range receivers may be arranged, e.g. in a grid pattern for economy, throughout the space being observed. Due to the low range, a tagged entity will be identified by only a few close, networked receivers. An identified tag must be within range of the identifying reader, allowing a rough approximation of the tag location. Advanced systems combine visual coverage with a camera grid with the wireless coverage for the rough location.

Long range sensor concepts

Most systems use a continuous physical measurement (such as angle and distance or distance only) along with the identification data in one combined signal. Reach by these sensors mostly covers an entire floor, or an aisle or just a single room. Short reach solutions get applied with multiple sensors and overlapping reach.

Angle of arrival

Angle of arrival (AoA) is the angle from which a signal arrives at a receiver. AoA is usually determined by measuring the time difference of arrival (TDOA) between multiple antennas in a sensor array. In other receivers, it is determined by an array of highly directional sensors—the angle can be determined by which sensor received the signal. AoA is usually used with triangulation and a known base line to find the location relative to two anchor transmitters.

Time of arrival

Time of arrival (ToA, also time of flight) is the amount of time a signal takes to propagate from transmitter to receiver. Because the signal propagation rate is constant and known (ignoring differences in mediums) the travel time of a signal can be used to directly calculate distance. Multiple measurements can be combined with trilateration and multilateration to find a location. This is the technique used by GPS and Ultra Wideband systems. Systems which use ToA, generally require a complicated synchronization mechanism to maintain a reliable source of time for sensors (though this can be avoided in carefully designed systems by using repeaters to establish coupling[17]).

The accuracy of the TOA based methods often suffers from massive multipath conditions in indoor localization, which is caused by the reflection and diffraction of the RF signal from objects (e.g., interior wall, doors or furniture) in the environment. However, it is possible to reduce the effect of multipath by applying temporal or spatial sparsity based techniques.[48] [49]

Joint angle and time of arrival

Joint estimation of angles and times of arrival is another method of estimating the location of the user. Indeed, instead of requiring multiple access points and techniques such as triangulation and trilateration, a single access point will be able to locate a user with combined angles and times of arrival.[50] Even more, techniques that leverage both space and time dimensions can increase the degrees of freedom of the whole system and further create more virtual resources to resolve more sources, via subspace approaches.[51]

Received signal strength indication

Received signal strength indication (RSSI) is a measurement of the power level received by sensor. Because radio waves propagate according to the inverse-square law, distance can be approximated (typically to within 1.5 meters in ideal conditions and 2 to 4 meters in standard conditions[52]) based on the relationship between transmitted and received signal strength (the transmission strength is a constant based on the equipment being used), as long as no other errors contribute to faulty results. The inside of buildings is not free space, so accuracy is significantly impacted by reflection and absorption from walls. Non-stationary objects such as doors, furniture, and people can pose an even greater problem, as they can affect the signal strength in dynamic, unpredictable ways.

A lot of systems use enhanced Wi-Fi infrastructure to provide location information.[12][14][15] None of these systems serves for proper operation with any infrastructure as is. Unfortunately, Wi-Fi signal strength measurements are extremely noisy, so there is ongoing research focused on making more accurate systems

Others wireless technologies

Other technologies

Non-radio technologies can be used for positioning without using the existing wireless infrastructure. This can provide increased accuracy at the expense of costly equipment and installations.

Magnetic positioning
Main article: Magnetic positioning

Magnetic positioning can offer pedestrians with smartphones an indoor accuracy of 1–2 meters with 90% confidence level, without using the additional wireless infrastructure for positioning. Magnetic positioning is based on the iron inside buildings that create local variations in the Earth's magnetic field. Un-optimized compass chips inside smartphones can sense and record these magnetic variations to map indoor locations.[55]

Inertial measurements

Pedestrian dead reckoning and other approaches for positioning of pedestrians propose an inertial measurement unit carried by the pedestrian either by measuring steps indirectly (step counting) or in a foot mounted approach,[56] sometimes referring to maps or other additional sensors to constrain the inherent sensor drift encountered with inertial navigation. The MEMS inertial sensors suffer from internal noises which result in cubically growing position error with time. To reduce the error growth in such devices a Kalman Filtering based approach is often used.[57][58][59][60] However, in order to make it capable to build map itself, the SLAM algorithm framework [61] will be used.[62][63] [64]

Inertial measures generally cover the differentials of motion, hence the location gets determined with integrating and thus requires integration constants to provide results.[65][66] The actual position estimation can be found as the maximum of a 2-d probability distribution which is recomputed at each step taking into account the noise model of all the sensors involved and the constraints posed by walls and furniture.[67] Based on the motions and users' walking behaviors, IPS is able to estimate users' locations by machine learning algorithms.[68]

Positioning based on visual markers

A visual positioning system can determine the location of a camera-enabled mobile device by decoding location coordinates from visual markers. In such a system, markers are placed at specific locations throughout a venue, each marker encoding that location's coordinates: latitude, longitude and height off the floor. Measuring the visual angle from the device to the marker enables the device to estimate its own location coordinates in reference to the marker. Coordinates include latitude, longitude, level and altitude off the floor.[69][70]

Location based on known visual features

A collection of successive snapshots from a mobile device's camera can build a database of images that is suitable for estimating location in a venue. Once the database is built, a mobile device moving through the venue can take snapshots that can be interpolated into the venue's database, yielding location coordinates. These coordinates can be used in conjunction with other location techniques for higher accuracy. Note that this can be a special case of sensor fusion where a camera plays the role of yet another sensor.

Mathematics

Once sensor data has been collected, an IPS tries to determine the location from which the received transmission was most likely collected. The data from a single sensor is generally ambiguous and must be resolved by a series of statistical procedures to combine several sensor input streams.

Empirical method

One way to determine position is to match the data from the unknown location with a large set of known locations using an algorithm such as k-nearest neighbor. This technique requires a comprehensive on-site survey and will be inaccurate with any significant change in the environment (due to moving persons or moved objects).

Mathematical modeling

Location will be calculated mathematically by approximating signal propagation and finding angles and / or distance. Inverse trigonometry will then be used to determine location:

Advanced systems combine more accurate physical models with statistical procedures:

Uses

The major consumer benefit of indoor positioning is the expansion of location-aware mobile computing indoors. As mobile devices become ubiquitous, contextual awareness for applications has become a priority for developers. Most applications currently rely on GPS, however, and function poorly indoors. Applications benefiting from indoor location include:

See also

References
  1. Magda Chelly, Nel Samama. New techniques for indoor positioning, combining deterministic and estimation methods. ENC-GNSS 2009 : European Navigation Conference - Global Navigation Satellite Systems, May 2009, Naples, Italy. pp.1 - 12. ⟨hal-01367483⟩
  2. Curran, Kevin; Furey, Eoghan; Lunney, Tom; Santos, Jose; Woods, Derek; McCaughey, Aiden (2011). "An Evaluation of Indoor Location Determination Technologies". Journal of Location Based Services. 5 (2): 61–78. doi:10.1080/17489725.2011.562927. S2CID 6154778.
  3. Belmonte-Fernández, Ó.; Montoliu, R.; Torres-Sospedra, J.; Sansano-Sansano, E.; Chia-Aguilar, D. (2018). "A radiosity-based method to avoid calibration for indoor positioning systems". Expert Systems with Applications. 105: 89–101. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2018.03.054. hdl:10234/175947. S2CID 46918367.
  4. "2cm accuracy using an Indoor Positioning System". VBOX Automotive. 2019-11-19. Archived from the original on 2021-01-21. Retrieved 2019-11-19.
  5. "2cm accuracy using RTK". VBOX Automotive. 2019-11-19. Archived from the original on 2021-01-18. Retrieved 2019-11-19.
  6. Qiu, Chen; Mutka, Matt (2016). "CRISP: cooperation among smartphones to improve indoor position information". Wireless Networks. 24 (3): 867–884. doi:10.1007/s11276-016-1373-1. S2CID 3941741.
  7. Furey, Eoghan; Curran, Kevin; McKevitt, Paul (2012). "HABITS: A Bayesian Filter Approach to Indoor Tracking and Location". International Journal of Bio-Inspired Computation. 4 (2): 79. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.459.8761. doi:10.1504/IJBIC.2012.047178.
  8. THES, Propagation of a position in a connected network, Chelly, Magda Lilia; Samama, Nel; 2011, 2011TELE0018,
  9. Yasir, M.; Ho, S.; Vellambi, B. N. (2014). "Indoor Positioning System Using Visible Light and Accelerometer". Journal of Lightwave Technology. 32 (19): 3306–3316. Bibcode:2014JLwT...32.3306Y. doi:10.1109/jlt.2014.2344772. S2CID 25188925.
  10. Liu X, Makino H, Mase K. 2010. Improved indoor location estimation using fluorescent light communication system with a nine-channel receiver. IEICE Transactions on Communications E93-B(11):2936-44.
  11. Farid, Z.; Nordin, R.; Ismail, M. (2013). "Recent Advances in Wireless Indoor Localization Techniques and System". Journal of Computer Networks and Communications. 2013: 1–12. doi:10.1155/2013/185138.
  12. Chang, N; Rashidzadeh, R; Ahmadi, M (2010). "Robust indoor positioning using differential Wi-Fi access points". IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics. 56 (3): 1860–7. doi:10.1109/tce.2010.5606338. S2CID 37179475.
  13. Atia, M. M.; Noureldin, A.; Korenberg, M. J. (2013). "Dynamic Online-Calibrated Radio Maps for Indoor Positioning in Wireless Local Area Networks". IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing. 12 (9): 1774–1787. doi:10.1109/tmc.2012.143. S2CID 15669485.
  14. Chiou, Y; Wang, C; Yeh, S (2010). "An adaptive location estimator using tracking algorithms for indoor WLANs". Wireless Networks. 16 (7): 1987–2012. doi:10.1007/s11276-010-0240-8. S2CID 41494773.
  15. Lim, H; Kung, L; Hou, JC; Haiyun, Luo (2010). "Zero-configuration indoor localization over IEEE 802.11 wireless infrastructure". Wireless Networks. 16 (2): 405–20. doi:10.1007/s11276-008-0140-3. S2CID 17678327.
  16. Reza, AW; Geok, TK (2009). "Investigation of indoor location sensing via RFID reader network utilizing grid covering algorithm". Wireless Personal Communications. 49 (1): 67–80. doi:10.1007/s11277-008-9556-4. S2CID 5562161.
  17. Zhou, Y; Law, CL; Guan, YL; Chin, F (2011). "Indoor elliptical localization based on asynchronous UWB range measurement". IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement. 60 (1): 248–57. Bibcode:2011ITIM...60..248Z. doi:10.1109/tim.2010.2049185. S2CID 12880695.
  18. Schweinzer, H; Kaniak, G (2010). "Ultrasonic device localization and its potential for wireless sensor network security". Control Engineering Practice. 18 (8): 852–62. doi:10.1016/j.conengprac.2008.12.007.
  19. Qiu, Chen; Mutka, Matt (2017). "Silent whistle: Effective indoor positioning with assistance from acoustic sensing on smartphones". 2017 IEEE 18th International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM). pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/WoWMoM.2017.7974312. ISBN 978-1-5386-2723-5. S2CID 30783515.
  20. Positioning and orientation using image processing a 2007 research from the University of Washington. Several similar approaches have been developed and there are currently (2017) smartphone applications implementing this technology.
  21. Startup uses a smartphone to track people indoors, - About Indoor Atlass (MIT Technology Review website)
  22. Vladimir Maximov and Oleg Tabarovsky, LLC RTLS, Moscow, Russia (2013). Survey of Accuracy Improvement Approaches for Tightly Coupled ToA/IMU Personal Indoor Navigation System. Proceedings of International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation, October 2013, Montbeliard, France.See publication here Archived 2014-12-05 at the Wayback Machine
  23. Wan Mohd Yaakob Wan Bejuri, Mohd Murtadha Mohamad and Raja Zahilah (2015). Offline Beacon Selection-Based RSSI Fingerprinting for Location-Aware Shopping Assistance: A Preliminary Result. New Trends in Intelligent Information and Database Systems, pp. 303-312, See publication here
  24. Wan Mohd Yaakob Wan Bejuri, Mohd Murtadha Mohamad and Raja Zahilah (2015). Emergency Rescue Localization (ERL) using GPS, Wireless LAN and Camera" International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, Vol. 9, No. 9, pp. 217-232, https://serscjournals.org/index.php/IJSEIA/vol9_no9_2015/19.pdf%5B%5D
  25. Wan Mohd Yaakob Wan Bejuri and Mohd Murtadha Mohamad (2014). Performance Analysis of Grey-World-based Feature Detection and Matching for Mobile Positioning Systems. Sensing and Imaging, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 1-24
  26. Wan Mohd, Yaakob Wan Bejuri; Murtadha Mohamad, Mohd (2014). "Wireless LAN/FM Radio-based Robust Mobile Indoor Positioning: An Initial Outcome" (PDF). International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications. 8 (2): 313–324.
  27. Wan; Yaakob Wan Bejuri, Mohd; Murtadha Mohamad, Mohd; Sapri, Maimunah; Shafry Mohd Rahim, Mohd; Ahsenali Chaudry, Junaid (2014). "Performance Evaluation of Spatial Correlation-based Feature Detection and Matching for Automated Wheelchair Navigation System". International Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems Research. 12 (1): 9–19. doi:10.1007/s13177-013-0064-x. S2CID 3478714.
  28. Wan Mohd Yaakob Wan Bejuri, Wan Mohd Nasri Wan Muhamad Saidin, Mohd Murtadha Mohamad, Maimunah Sapri and Kah Seng Lim (2013). Ubiquitous Positioning: Integrated GPS/Wireless LAN Positioning for Wheelchair Navigation System. Intelligent Information and Database Systems, Vol. 7802, pp. 394-403, See publication here
  29. Wan Mohd Yaakob Wan Bejuri, Mohd Murtadha Mohamad, Maimunah Sapri and Mohd Adly Rosly (2012). Ubiquitous WLAN/Camera Positioning using Inverse Intensity Chromaticity Space-based Feature Detection and Matching: A Preliminary Result. International Conference on Man-Machine Systems 2012 (ICOMMS 2012). See publication here
  30. Z. Horvath, H. Horvath (2014): The Measurement Preciseness of the GPS Built in Smartphones and Tablets, International Journal on Electronics and Communication Technology, issue 1, pp 17-19,
  31. "GNSS Indoors — Fighting The Fading, Part 1 - Inside GNSS". www.insidegnss.com. 2008-03-12. Archived from the original on 2018-01-10. Retrieved 2009-10-18.
  32. "Syntony rises high by going underground". November 2016.
  33. Furey, Eoghan; Curran, Kevin; McKevitt, Paul (2012). "Probabilistic Indoor Human Movement Modeling to Aid First Responders". Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. 3 (5): 559–569. doi:10.1007/s12652-012-0112-4. S2CID 16611408.
  34. Violettas, G. E.; Theodorou, T. L.; Georgiadis, C. K. (August 2009). "Net Argus: An SNMP Monitor & Wi-Fi Positioning, 3-tier Application Suite". 2009 Fifth International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Communications. pp. 346–351. doi:10.1109/ICWMC.2009.64. ISBN 978-1-4244-4679-7. S2CID 23482772.
  35. P. Bahl and V. N. Padmanabhan, "RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system," in Proceedings of 19th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (INFOCOM '00), vol. 2, pp. 775–784, Tel Aviv.Israel, March 2000.
  36. Youssef, Moustafa; Agrawala, Ashok (2007-01-04). "The Horus location determination system". Wireless Networks. 14 (3): 357–374. doi:10.1007/s11276-006-0725-7. ISSN 1022-0038. S2CID 62768948.
  37. Y. Chen and H. Kobayashi, "Signal strength based indoor geolocation," in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC '02), vol. 1, pp. 436–439, New York, NY, USA, April–May 2002.
  38. Golovan A. A. et al. Efficient localization using different mean offset models in Gaussian processes //2014 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN). – IEEE, 2014. – С. 365-374.
  39. Hähnel B. F. D., Fox D. Gaussian processes for signal strength-based location estimation //Proceeding of robotics: science and systems. – 2006.
  40. Ferris B., Fox D., Lawrence N. D. Wifi-slam using gaussian process latent variable models //IJCAI. – 2007. – Т. 7. – №. 1. – С. 2480-2485.Archived 2022-12-24 at the Wayback Machine
  41. Lymberopoulos, Dimitrios; Liu, Jie; Yang, Xue; Roy Choudhury, Romit; Handziski, Vlado; Sen, Souvik (2015). "A realistic evaluation and comparison of indoor location technologies". Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. pp. 178–189. doi:10.1145/2737095.2737726. ISBN 9781450334754. S2CID 1028754.
  42. Laoudias, C.; Constantinou, G.; Constantinides, M.; Nicolaou, S.; Zeinalipour-Yazti, D.; Panayiotou, C. G. (2012). "The Airplace Indoor Positioning Platform for Android Smartphones". 2012 IEEE 13th International Conference on Mobile Data Management. pp. 312–315. doi:10.1109/MDM.2012.68. ISBN 978-1-4673-1796-2. S2CID 14903792. (Best Demo Award)
  43. "Everything You Always Wanted To Know about Beacons". Bright Talk. Retrieved 2014-06-12.
  44. "Apple Is Launching A Vast Project To Map The Inside Of Every Large Building It Can". Business Insider. Retrieved 2014-06-12.
  45. "Apple Inc. iBeacon with Micromapping can revolutionize retail". ValueWalk. January 2014. Retrieved 2014-06-12.
  46. "Music City Center Unveil Wayfinding App". Retrieved 2014-11-28.
  47. "Music City Center app guides visitors". The Tennessean. Retrieved 2014-11-28.
  48. Pourhomayoun; Jin; Fowler (2012). "Spatial Sparsity Based Indoor Localization in Wireless Sensor Network for Assistive Healthcare Systems" (PDF). Embc2012.
  49. C.R. Comsa, et al.,“Source Localization Using Time Difference Of Arrival Within A Sparse Representation Framework”, ICASSP, 2011.
  50. Wen, Fuxi, and Chen Liang. "Fine-grained indoor localization using single access point with multiple antennas." IEEE Sensors Journal 15.3 (2014): 1538-1544.
  51. Ahmad Bazzi, Dirk TM Slock, and Lisa Meilhac. "Single snapshot joint estimation of angles and times of arrival: A 2D Matrix Pencil approach." 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). IEEE, 2016.
  52. Zhan Jie; Liu HongLi; Tanjian (December 2010). "Research on ranging accuracy based on RSSI of wireless sensor network". The 2nd International Conference on Information Science and Engineering. pp. 2338–2341. doi:10.1109/ICISE.2010.5691135. ISBN 978-1-4244-7616-9. S2CID 14465473.
  53. "Racelogic debuts VBOX indoor positioning system". 2018-09-24.
  54. Lee, Yong Up; Kavehrad, Mohsen;, "Long-range indoor hybrid localization system design with visible light communications and wireless network," Photonics Society Summer Topical Meeting Series, 2012 IEEE, vol., no., pp.82-83, 9–11 July 2012 See publication here
  55. "Geospatial World August 2014" (PDF). Geospatial World.
  56. Foxlin, Eric (1 November 2005). "Pedestrian Tracking with Shoe-Mounted Inertial Sensors". IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 25 (6): 38–46. doi:10.1109/MCG.2005.140. PMID 16315476. S2CID 19038276.
  57. Bose, Subhojyoti; Gupta, Amit K.; Handel, Peter (2017). "On the noise and power performance of a shoe-mounted multi-IMU inertial positioning system". 2017 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN). pp. 1–8. doi:10.1109/IPIN.2017.8115944. ISBN 978-1-5090-6299-7. S2CID 19055090.
  58. Gupta, Amit K.; Skog, Isaac; Handel, Peter (2015). "Long-term performance evaluation of a foot-mounted pedestrian navigation device". 2015 Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON). pp. 1–6. doi:10.1109/INDICON.2015.7443478. ISBN 978-1-4673-7399-9. S2CID 33398667.
  59. Nilsson, John-Olof; Gupta, Amit K.; Handel, Peter (2014). "Foot-mounted inertial navigation made easy". 2014 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN). pp. 24–29. doi:10.1109/IPIN.2014.7275464. ISBN 978-1-4673-8054-6. S2CID 898076.
  60. Zhang, Wenchao; Li, Xianghong; Wei, Dongyan; Ji, Xinchun; Yuan, Hong (2017). "A foot-mounted PDR system based on IMU/EKF+HMM+ZUPT+ZARU+HDR+compass algorithm". 2017 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation (IPIN). pp. 1–5. doi:10.1109/IPIN.2017.8115916. ISBN 978-1-5090-6299-7. S2CID 19693291.
  61. Simultaneous localization and mapping
  62. Wan Mohd Yaakob Wan Bejuri, Mohd Murtadha Mohamad, Raja Zahilah (2015). A Proposal of Emergency Rescue Location (ERL) using Optimization of Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU) based Pedestrian Simultaneously Localization and Mapping (SLAM). International Journal of Smart Home. Vol 9: No.12, pp: 9-22.https://serscjournals.org/index.php/IJSH/vol9_no12_2015/2.pdf
  63. Wan Mohd Yaakob Wan Bejuri, Mohd Murtadha Mohamad, Raja Zahilah (2015). Optimisation of Emergency Rescue Location (ERL) using KLD Resampling: An Initial Proposal. International Journal of u- and e- Service, Science and Technology. Vol 9: No.2, pp: 249-262. https://serscjournals.org/index.php/IJUNESST/vol9_no2/25.pdf%5B%5D
  64. Wan Mohd Yaakob Wan Bejuri, Mohd Murtadha Mohamad, Raja Zahilah (2015). Optimization of Rao-Blackwellized Particle Filter in Activity Pedestrian Simultaneously Localization and Mapping (SLAM): An Initial Proposal. International Journal of Security and Its Applications. Vol 9: No.11, pp: 377-390. https://serscjournals.org/index.php/IJSIA/vol9_no11_2015/35.pdf%5B%5D
  65. "Sensor fusion and map aiding for indoor navigation". Archived from the original on 2010-04-28.
  66. "Pedestrian localization for indoor environments" (PDF).
  67. Carboni, Davide; Manchinu, Andrea; Marotto, Valentina; Piras, Andrea; Serra, Alberto (2015). "Infrastructure-free indoor navigation: a case study". Journal of Location Based Services. 9: 33–54. doi:10.1080/17489725.2015.1027751. S2CID 34080648.
  68. Qiu, Chen; Mutka, Matt (2017). "Self-improving indoor localization by profiling outdoor movement on smartphones". 2017 IEEE 18th International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM). pp. 1–9. doi:10.1109/WoWMoM.2017.7974311. ISBN 978-1-5386-2723-5. S2CID 8560911.
  69. "Wearables come in for a refit".
  70. Daniş, F. Serhan; Naskali, A. Teoman; Cemgil, A. Taylan; Ersoy, Cem (2022). "An indoor localization dataset and data collection framework with high precision position annotation". Pervasive and Mobile Computing. 81: 101554. arXiv:2209.02270. doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2022.101554. S2CID 246887116.
  71. Al-Ahmadi, Abdullah; Qasaymeh, Yazeed Mohammad; R. P., Praveen; Alghamdi, Ali (2019). "Bayesian Approach for Indoor Wave Propagation Modeling". Progress in Electromagnetics Research M. 83: 41–50. doi:10.2528/pierm19042804. ISSN 1937-8726.
  72. Daniş, F. Serhan; Cemgil, A. Taylan; Ersoy, Cem (2021). "Adaptive Sequential Monte Carlo Filter for Indoor Positioning and Tracking with Bluetooth Low Energy Beacons". IEEE Access. 9: 37022–37038. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3062818.
  73. Bai, Y; Jia, W; Zhang, H; Mao, Z. H.; Sun, M (2014). Landmark-based indoor positioning for visually impaired individuals. 12th International Conference on Signal Processing (ICSP). Vol. 2014. pp. 678–681. doi:10.1109/ICOSP.2014.7015087. ISBN 978-1-4799-2186-7. PMC 4512241. PMID 26213718.
  74. Gaith Saqer (March 2010). "Junaio 2.0 First Indoor Social Augmented Reality App at SXSW With Developers API". Archived from the original on 2010-03-12.
  75. "Fraunhofer IIS uses Awiloc indoor positioning magic to guide museum patrons".
  76. Qiu, C.; Mutka, M. W. (2015-10-01). "AirLoc: Mobile Robots Assisted Indoor Localization". 2015 IEEE 12th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems. pp. 407–415. doi:10.1109/MASS.2015.10. ISBN 978-1-4673-9101-6. S2CID 13133026.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.