Unequal leg length

Unequal leg length (also termed leg length inequality, LLI or leg length discrepancy, LLD) is where the legs are either different lengths or appear to be different lengths because of misalignment. Leg length inequality is very common; small inequalities in leg length may affect 40%-70% of the human population. It has been estimated that at least 0.1% of the population have a difference greater than 20 mm (0.79 in).[1]

Unequal leg length
A girl with a congenital, structural difference in leg lengths walking in a clinic.
SpecialtyRheumatology Edit this on Wikidata

Classification

There are two main types of leg length inequalities:

  • Structural differences are caused by the legs themselves being measurably different in length, usually due to differences in the length of the femur in the thigh or the tibia and fibula bones in the lower leg. This may be a birth defect or it may occur after a broken leg, serious infection, or local damage to one of the growth plates in a leg.
  • The other, more common, type is seen when the legs themselves are the same length, but due to neuromuscular injuries in the pelvis or upper leg, one leg or hip is held higher and tighter than the other (hypertonicity in the musculature of the pelvis or leg). These unequally tightened muscles cause the legs to seem to be different lengths, even though careful measurement would show equal lengths of the actual leg. This is called leg length alignment asymmetry (LLAA) and can be seen while lying down.[2]

Diagnosis and workup
X-rays for leg length measurement.

Unequal leg length in children is frequently first suspected by parents noticing a limp that appears to be getting worse.[3] The standard workup in children is a thorough physical examination, including observing the child while walking and running.[3] Also, at least in United States, standard workup in children also includes X-rays to quantify actual length of the bones of the legs.[3]

On X-rays, there is generally measurement of both the femur and the tibia, as well as both combined.[4] Various measuring points for these have been suggested, but a functional method is to measure the distances between joint surfaces:[4]

  • Femur length: The superior aspect of the femoral head and the distal portion of the medial femoral condyle.
  • Tibial length: The medial tibial plateau and the tibial plafond

A leg length difference can result from a pelvic torsion.

Abnormal (gravity drive) pronation will drive the innominate bones forward (anteriorly). The forward rotation of the innominate will shorten the leg (See Rothbart 2006). The more pronated foot will have the more forwardly rotated innominate bone. And will be the side with the functionally short leg.

In adults, leg length discrepancy is believed to cause low back pain as a result of increased pelvic obliquity and lumbar scoliosis.[5]

Treatment

The most common treatment for discrepancies in leg length is the use of a simple heel lift, which can be placed within the shoe. In cases where the length discrepancy is moderate, an external build up to the shoe is usually more comfortable. An improved method for addressing differences in leg length involves measuring and rectifying the disparities while standing upright and weight bearing. Adjustments of minor or significant biomechanical change can be made to the foot's angle and height to correct the discrepancies in real-time using a mechanical device like the Vertical Foot Alignment System (VFAS). This technique will take into account the changes that the foot goes through when under a weight bearing condition including correct foot alignment, arch support and comfort.

The left shoe has greater height and weight bearing correction designed using VFAS.

In severe cases, surgery can be used to make the longer leg shorter (or impede its growth), and/or make the shorter leg longer via limb lengthening.

Measurement challenges

Although prone "functional leg length" is a widely used chiropractic tool in their Activator technique, it is not a recognized anthropometric technique, since legs are usually of unequal length, and measurements in the prone position are not entirely valid estimates of standing X-ray differences.[6] Measurements in the standing position are far more reliable.[7] Another confounding factor is that simply moving the two legs held together and leaning them imperceptibly to one side or the other pr

    oduces different results.[8]

    VFAS is a mechanical device used to correct foot alignment while weight bearing

    Clinical measurement of leg length conventionally uses the distance from the anterior superior iliac spine to the medial malleolus.[9] Projectional radiographic measurements of leg length have two main variants:[10]

    • Teleroentgenogram, which projects the entirety of both legs at the same time.
    • Orthoroentgenogram, which takes separate images of the hip, knee and ankle.

    On X-rays, the length of the lower limb can be measured from the proximal end of femoral head to the center of the plafond of the distal tibia.[11]

    See also

    References
    1. Gurney, Burke (2002-04-01). "Leg length discrepancy". Gait & Posture. 15 (2): 195–206. doi:10.1016/S0966-6362(01)00148-5. ISSN 0966-6362. LLD is a relatively common problem found in as many as 40 [1] to 70% [2] of the population. In a retrospective study, it was found that LLD of greater than 20 mm affects at least one in every 1000 people [3].
    2. Knutson G. A. (2005). "Anatomic and functional leg-length inequality: A review and recommendation for clinical decision-making. Part II, the functional or unloaded leg-length asymmetry". Chiropractic & Osteopathy. 13 (12): 12. doi:10.1186/1746-1340-13-12. PMC 1198238. PMID 16080787.
    3. "Leg Length Discrepancy (Pediatric)". Columbia University. Retrieved 2019-02-14.
    4. Sabharwal, Sanjeev; Kumar, Ajay (2008). "Methods for Assessing Leg Length Discrepancy". Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 466 (12): 2910–2922. doi:10.1007/s11999-008-0524-9. ISSN 0009-921X. PMC 2628227. PMID 18836788.
    5. Needham, R.; Chockalingam, N.; Dunning, D.; Healy, A.; Ahmed, E. B.; Ward, A. (2012). "The effect of leg length discrepancy on pelvis and spine kinematics during gait". Research into Spinal Deformities 8: 104–107. doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-067-3-104.
    6. D W Rhodes, E R Mansfield, P A Bishop, J F Smith. The validity of the prone leg check as an estimate of standing leg length inequality measured by X-ray. J Manipulative Physiol Ther.; 18 (6):343-6
    7. Hanada E, Kirby RL, Mitchell M, Swuste JM (Jul 2001). "Measuring leg-length discrepancy by the "iliac crest palpation and book correction" method: reliability and validity". Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 82 (7): 938–42. doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.22622. PMID 11441382.
    8. "Adjusting the Joints, on season 12, episode 10". Scientific American Frontiers. Chedd-Angier Production Company. 2001–2002. PBS. Archived from the original on 2006-01-01.. Video discusses Activator technique and leg length
    9. Page 305 in: M. Lynn Palmer, Marcia E. Epler, Marcia F. Epler (1998). Fundamentals of Musculoskeletal Assessment Techniques. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. ISBN 9780781710077.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
    10. Page 269 in: Dror Paley (2002). Principles of Deformity Correction, Volume 1. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 9783540416654.
    11. Sabharwal, Sanjeev; Zhao, Caixia; McKeon, John; Melaghari, Todd; Blacksin, Marcia; Wenekor, Cornelia (2007). "Reliability Analysis for Radiographic Measurement of Limb Length Discrepancy". Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. 27 (1): 46–50. doi:10.1097/01.bpo.0000242444.26929.9f. ISSN 0271-6798.

    Rothbart BA 2006. Relationship of Functional Leg-Length Discrepancy to Abnormal Pronation. Journal American Podiatric Medical Association;96(6):499-507

    This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.