Notions (Winchester College)

Page of "Notions" from Winchester Word Book by Robert Wrench, 1891

Winchester College notions are not all specific to the school, but have a variety of origins. Clearly specific are some of the names of places or objects inside the school, such as "Gunner's Hole" for the old swimming-place on the river,[11] or "Moab" for the washing-place in College, from the passage in Psalm 60 "Moab is my wash-pot".[12]

There are, too, some quite specific notions based on school customs. "College Men" are pupils with scholarships, living in the school's medieval buildings, while "Commoners" are all the rest. For his first few weeks as a "Jun Man" (junior pupil), a Commoner has a Tégé (pronounced and sometimes written "Teejay") while a College Man has a Pater (Latin for "father"): a Middle Part (second year) Man appointed to look after his "Protégé" (from French) or, in College, "Filius" (Latin for "son").[13] A Toys is the upright wooden stall with a seat and cupboard where a pupil works and keeps his books; it is said to derive from Old French toise, "fathom", for the original width of a Toys. From this comes Toytime, evening homework or prep.[14]

A few notions have historically been shared with other schools: for instance Eton once used words like "div" (class or form[lower-alpha 1])[15] and "poser" (examiner, as used in Middle English by Geoffrey Chaucer),[16] and Radley uses "don" for teacher.[17][18] Some are common words used in a particular sense, like Man, which at Winchester means a pupil of any age.[19] Other are derived from common usages, such as "to mug up" which has a dictionary meaning of "to study intensively";[20] the notion to mug just means "to work"; hence Mugging Hall, the room in every house (not including College) surrounded by rows of Toys cubicles where pupils work. To mug also means to bestow pains upon (something),[21] like "to muzz" at Westminster School.[22]

The importance given to notions at Winchester caused them to be recorded carefully over a long period, so that compared to schools like Westminster or Eton which had similarly rich and old traditions, Winchester's notions are now uniquely accessible to scholars, who have begun to examine them both as words and as the customs of "an institution notoriously eccentric even within living memory and almost unimaginably so before the reforms of 1867".[23]

Many notions were formed by vowel-modification, a widespread practice in the 19th century; thus "crockets" is the notion for the playground game of French cricket,[3] while "Bogle" or "bogwheel" is a modification of "bicycle".[24]

Other forms derive from slang, such as "ekker" (exercise), using the common speech ending "-er"; others again were once dialectal forms, such as "brum" for penniless, from Kentish dialect "brumpt" (bankrupt).[4] Wrench suggests that Lob[ster] for "to cry" may come from Hampshire dialect "louster", to make an unpleasant noise.[25]

Some notions, such as foricas (toilet) and licet/non-licet (permissible/forbidden) are straightforwardly Latin terms.[4]

A few are derived from Old English: brock (to bully) is ultimately from Old English broc, badger, which Three Beetleites suggests survived by way of northern dialect "brock" (badger) and the bullying sport of badger-baiting.[26] Swink (to work hard) is a survival from Old English swincan (Middle English swynke), with the same meaning,[27] while Cud, meaning pretty, derives ultimately from Old English cuð, via northern dialect "couth" or "cooth".[28]

Other notions are from Middle English: a scob, a type of chest used as a desk in College, is a Middle English word derived from Latin scabellum, French Escabeau,[29] while thoke (a rest, an idle time[13]), meant "soft, flabby" in the 15th century.[30][31]

Several notions were created by abbreviating words, as in Div (from "Division of the School"), for class or form.[13] Such notions could be assembled into phrases – for example, the Dons' Common Room Notice Board became Do Co Ro No Bo.[4] Abbreviations are often indicated by a colon, as in 18th-century handwriting, for example "Sen: Co: Prae:" (Senior Commoner Prefect); some end with a long vowel, indicated with a macron, for example "competī", "mathmā" and "examinā" (for "competition", "mathematics", and "examinations" respectively).[4][32] There were slight differences of vocabulary between College Men and Commoners.[33]

Some notions acquired a folk etymology:

• Remedy and Half-remedy (usually shortened to rem and half-rem), meaning a day or a half-day holiday respectively, was formerly supposed to be derived from dies remissionis (holiday), anglicised as "remi day". Its actual origin is Latin remedium, rest or refreshment.[34]
• Firk, to expel, is derived straightforwardly from Old English fercian, via Middle English fferke. A folk etymology from Latin furca, "[pitch]fork", gave rise to a legend that expelled pupils had their clothes handed to them through the gate by Old Mill on a pitchfork.[35]

Notions examinā, or latterly just "Notions", used to be an annual event in each house, including College.[38] It was held after the first two weeks of the autumn term, and was designed to test new boys' familiarity with the manners and customs of the school.[3][39] In College, it was accompanied by feasting and a ritual list of absurd formulaic questions and answers, such as[38]

Which way does College clock face?
Into Mrs. Bendle's boudoir.[38]

Sabben-Clare writes that the clock has no face, and doubts whether the odd-job man's wife had a boudoir.[38]

In 1872, under the headmaster George Ridding, "tunding", beatings given by a prefect (a senior pupil), using a ground-ash across the shoulders, were still permitted. The matter became a national scandal, known as "the Tunding Row", when "an overzealous Senior Commoner Prefect, J.D. Whyte,"[40] beat the senior boy of Turner's house, William Macpherson, for refusing to attend a notions test. He received "thirty cuts of a ground-ash inflicted on his back and shoulders".[40] Ridding made matters worse by trying to defend the action; the public came to understand that both the housemaster and the headmaster knew and approved of the action. The result was public outrage. Ridding "less than whole-hearted[ly]"[40] limited the prefects' power to beat to twelve cuts, to be administered only on the back.[40] Notions tests were forbidden as a "disgraceful innovation".[41] The Dictionary of National Biography wrote in 1912 that "The incident was trivial, but the victim's father appealed to The Times, and an animated, though in general ill-informed, correspondence followed."[42] Two governors resigned.[42] The notions test however persisted, but more gently and more informally.[38]