Cuche Formation

Cuche Formation
Cuche Formation
Stratigraphic range: Frasnian-Early Carboniferous; ~
Type	Geological formation
Unit of	Floresta Massif
Underlies	Girón Fm., Tibasosa Fm.
Overlies	Floresta Formation
Area	~36 km2 (14 sq mi)
Thickness	300–900 m (980–2,950 ft)
Lithology
Primary	Sandstone, siltstone
Other	Shale
Location
Coordinates	5°51′37.2″N 72°56′57.6″W
Region	Altiplano Cundiboyacense; Eastern Ranges, Andes
Country	Colombia
Type section
Named for	Vereda Cuche
Named by	Botero
Location	Floresta
Year defined	1950
Coordinates	5°51′37.2″N 72°56′57.6″W
Approximate paleocoordinates	51.7°S 48.1°W
Region	Boyacá
Country	Colombia
	; Paleogeography of the Middle Devonian; 380 Ma, by Stampfli & Borel

The Cuche Formation (Spanish: Formación Cuche, Cc) is a geological formation of the Floresta Massif, Altiplano Cundiboyacense in the Eastern Ranges of the Colombian Andes. The sequence of siltstones, shales, and sandstone beds dates to the Late Devonian and Early Carboniferous periods, and has a maximum thickness of 900 metres (3,000 ft).

Contrasting with the original coastal depositional environment, the Cuche Formation is found at altitudes of more than 2,500 metres (8,200 ft) in the Eastern Colombian Andes around Floresta, Boyacá

The formation was deposited in a tidal-dominated deltaic environment at high southern paleolatitudes at the edge of the Paleozoic Paleo-Tethys Ocean. The Cuche Formation is highly fossiliferous; many Placoderm fish fossils, flora, bivalves, arthropods, crustaceans and ostracods have been discovered in the youngest Paleozoic strate of the Floresta Massif, while the underlying Floresta Formation is richer in trilobite biodiversity.[1]

Etymology

The formation was first described as part of the Floresta Series by Olsson and Carter in 1939. The current definition was given by Botero in 1950.[2] The formation is named after the vereda Cuche of Floresta, Boyacá, where the formation outcrops.[3] The word Cuche is taken from Muysccubun, the language of the indigenous Muisca, who inhabited the Altiplano Cundiboyacense before the Spanish conquest.[4]

Regional setting

The Floresta Massif is a block in the northern part of the Altiplano Cundiboyacense, marked by a metamorphic crystalline core overlain by Devonian to Carboniferous sedimentary sequences; from old to young, the El Tíbet, Floresta and Cuche Formations. The Paleozoic succession is overlain by sediments of much younger date; the Late Jurassic Girón and Early Cretaceous Tibasosa Formations. The massif is bound to the east by the Soapaga Fault and to the west by the Boyacá Fault.[5]

At time of deposition of the Devonian formations, present-day northern South America was located at the edge of the Paleo-Tethys Ocean on the southern hemisphere. The Paleozoic occurrence on the Altiplano is localized in outcrop; the majority of surface sediments are Cretaceous to Paleogene in age. Neogene uplift of the Eastern Ranges, with its main phase in the Plio-Pleistocene, caused the exhumation of older units at surface along major thrust faults in the Eastern Andes. In two phases during the Paleozoic, intrusions occurred into the sedimentary sequence, causing local metamorphism. The first phase is considered pre-Devonian and the latter phase post-Devonian. The remaining stratigraphy of the Cuche Formation appears little affected by this intrusive phase,[6] although slight metamorphism has been identified in later research.[7]

Description

Lithologies

The Cuche Formation is characterised by mostly cream and purple coloured shales, with a basal unit of micaceous siltstones with intercalated yellowish-grey shales and 30 metres (98 ft) thick quartzitic and feldspar-rich sandstone beds that colour red caused by meteoric waters. The sandstones have an iron-rich cementation.[3] A middle unit of fine-grained sandstones with thin banks of siltstones follows the lower part and an upper sequence of shales with interbedded ferruginous red beds.[2] The lower sequence contains runzelmark syn-sedimentary structures.[3]

Stratigraphy and depositional environment

The depositional environment of the Cuche Formation has been analysed to be a low-energy tidal-dominated deltaic setting, with frequent marine incursions into continental and lagoonal areas marked by the presence of both the flora and the many fish species found in the formation

The Cuche Formation in some places discordantly and in other areas transitionally defined by colour changes,[8][9] overlies the Floresta Formation in Boyacá and the Mogotes Formation in Santander,[10] and is, by an angular unconformity up to 60 degrees,[11] overlain by the Upper Jurassic Girón,[12] and Early Cretaceous Tibasosa Formations.[3] The angular unconformity between the Paleozoic and Mesozoic is exposed along the road between Duitama and Sogamoso, and is the location where the first flora fossils were found in 1978.[11]

The age of the Cuche Formation has been estimated to be Late Devonian to Early Carboniferous,[2][13] after an original designation as Permian-Carboniferous by Botero in 1950, further restricted to the Carboniferous by Julivert in 1968.[14] The formation covers an area of approximately 36 square kilometres (14 sq mi) and ranges in thickness between 300 and 900 metres (980 and 2,950 ft).[2] Stratigraphically, the Cuche Formation is time equivalent with the Diamante Formation of the Santander Massif to the north of the Altiplano Cundiboyacense.[15] To the west of Paz de Río, the Cuche Formation is thrusted upon the Neogene Concentración Formation by the Soapaga Fault.[16] In the northern part of the Floresta Massif, the contact between the metamorphic Otengá Stock and the Cuche Formation is formed by the Duga Fault.[17]

Based on the preservation of fossils, the lithologies, syn-sedimentary structures and stratigraphic position, a depositional environment of shallow low energy waters has been proposed, possibly in a lagoonal setting at the edge of a regressional Paleo-Tethys Ocean.[1][18] Other parts of the Cuche Formation were deposited in a continental environment, evidenced by the red beds and absence of marine fossils and abundant root imprints.[19] Overall, the sequence represents a coastal deltaic environment with frequent marine incursions, a tidal deltaic setting.[20][21]

Fossil content

Fossil flora from the Cuche Formation were identified as "Ginkgo-like" species, as this Baiera reconstruction. Proper Ginkgo do not appear in the geological record until the Middle Permian

The first identification of fossil content of the Cuche Formation was done by Botero, who studied the formation in 1950. Research in the early 1980s revealed the presence of many more fossils in the formation and among the first fossil flora found were species then identified as the genera Ginkgo and Baiera.[14] The lower units show poorly preserved plant remains and the overlying shales provided arthropods and crustaceans. In the middle units of the formation, more and better preserved plant fossils were found alongside bivalves, ostracods (of the genus Welleria) and arthropods.[22]

The Cuche Formation contains unique Placoderm fish fossils, first noted by Mojica and Villarroel in 1984.[23] Across the section, also plant fossils and bivalves are found. In this part of the sequence the first fish fossils were discovered. The top section provided brachiopods (genus Lingula) and other at that moment undetermined fossil fragments.[24]

Later research has provided more insight into the flora of the formation, with the "Ginkgo" species possibly a Ginkgophyton sp..[25] Additionally, fossil flora of Colpodexylon cf. deatsii and cf. Archaeopteris sp. have been described from the formation.[26] In the continental sandstone facies of the Cuche Formation, ichnofossils of Diplichnites have been described.[27]

Fishes

Antarctilamna (Gondwanan)

Bothriolepis (Euramerican)

Holoptychius (Euramerican)

The fossil assemblage of the Cuche Formation is unique in the mixture of typical Euramerican (Laurussian) and Gondwanan fish and flora species.

A closer paleogeographical relation between the paleocontinents has been suggested to explain this curious combination.

Remains of the cartilaginous fish Antarctilamna sp., the Placoderms Asterolepis sp. and two species of Bothriolepis,[28] the spiny shark ?Cheiracanthoides sp., the Porolepiform Holoptychius sp., and the Rhizodontid ?Strepsodus sp. have been uncovered from the Cuche Formation.[23] Several other fossils are less well recognizable at the genus level, among others Actinopterygii, Sarcopterygii,[29] and Osteolepiformes.[30] The fish specimens were found in sediments possibly representing localized transgressive marine incursions into brackish lagoonal settings,[20][31] in all cases associated with the presence of bivalves, ostracods and brachiopods.[32]

The fossil fish assemblage of the Cuche Formation presents a curious mixture of Euramerican "Old Red Sandstone" (Catskills, Greenland, Scotland and the Baltic states)[20] species (Asterolepis and Holoptychius), and Gondwanan taxa (Antarctilamna), suggesting the interchange of species between the paleogeographical regions, possibly at closer distance than is presented in most paleogeographical models.[33][34] This hypothesis is further strengthened by the discovery of typical Euramerican flora, as Archaeopteris.[26]

Asterolepis has been known only from Euramerican fossils, except for a specimen found in Iran.[20] The fish of the Cuche Formation are quite different from Bolivian Devonian fossils, with the exception of Antarctilamna. The similar sediments of the Colpacucho Formation in Bolivia have not provided the species discovered in the Cuche Formation, probably because of the cooler climate of the Devonian Bolivian seas more to the south than the paleogeographical position of northern Colombia (already around 51°S) at that time.[34]

Fossils assigned to Florestacanthus cf. morenoi, Colombiaspis rinconensis and Colombialepis villarroeli were later described from the Cuche Formation.[35][36][37]

Eurypterids

In 2019, fragments of the eurypterid Pterygotus were retrieved from the formation. The find represents the first sea scorpion from Colombia and the fourth from South America.[38] The specimen (SGC-MGJRG.2018.I.5), assigned with uncertainty to P. bolivianus due to similarities with its holotype, represents the first eurypterid of Colombia and the fourth of South America. The fossil was dated as Frasnian (Late Devonian), showing that Pterygotus did not become extinct during the Middle Devonian as previously thought.[39]

Outcrops

Cuche Formation is located in the Altiplano Cundiboyacense

Type locality of the Cuche Formation in the north of the Altiplano Cundiboyacense

The Cuche Formation is found at the Floresta Massif around its type locality in Floresta, Boyacá, stretching across Floresta to the west close to Belén and Paz de Río,[2][40] up to north of Tibasosa in the valley of the Chicamocha River.[41]

Regional correlations

Stratigraphy of the Llanos Basin and surrounding provinces
Ma	Age	Regional events	Catatumbo	Cordillera	proximal Llanos	distal Llanos	Putumayo	VSM	Environments	Maximum thickness	Petroleum geology	Notes
0.01	Holocene	Holocene volcanism Seismic activity	alluvium								Overburden
1	Pleistocene	Pleistocene volcanism Andean orogeny 3 Glaciations	Guayabo	Soatá Sabana	Necesidad	Guayabo	Gigante Neiva		Alluvial to fluvial (Guayabo)	550 m (1,800 ft) (Guayabo)		[42][43][44][45]
2.6	Pliocene	Pliocene volcanism Andean orogeny 3 GABI		Subachoque			Gigante Neiva
5.3	Messinian	Andean orogeny 3 Foreland		Marichuela			Caimán	Honda				[44][46]
13.5	Langhian	Regional flooding	León	hiatus	Caja	León	Caimán		Lacustrine (León)	400 m (1,300 ft) (León)	Seal	[45][47]
16.2	Burdigalian	Miocene inundations Andean orogeny 2	C1		Carbonera C1		Ospina		Proximal fluvio-deltaic (C1)	850 m (2,790 ft) (Carbonera)	Reservoir	[46][45]
17.3			C2		Carbonera C2				Distal lacustrine-deltaic (C2)		Seal
19			C3		Carbonera C3				Proximal fluvio-deltaic (C3)		Reservoir
21	Early Miocene	Pebas wetlands	C4		Carbonera C4			Barzalosa	Distal fluvio-deltaic (C4)		Seal
23	Late Oligocene	Andean orogeny 1 Foredeep	C5		Carbonera C5		Orito		Proximal fluvio-deltaic (C5)		Reservoir	[43][46]
25	Late Oligocene		C6		Carbonera C6		Orito		Distal fluvio-lacustrine (C6)		Seal
28	Early Oligocene		C7		C7		Pepino	Gualanday	Proximal deltaic-marine (C7)		Reservoir	[43][46][48]
32	Oligo-Eocene		C8	Usme	C8	onlap			Marine-deltaic (C8)		Seal Source	[48]
35	Late Eocene		Mirador	Usme	Mirador				Coastal (Mirador)	240 m (790 ft) (Mirador)	Reservoir	[45][49]
40	Middle Eocene			Regadera				hiatus
45	Middle Eocene
50	Early Eocene		Socha		Los Cuervos				Deltaic (Los Cuervos)	260 m (850 ft) (Los Cuervos)	Seal Source	[45][49]
55	Late Paleocene	PETM 2000 ppm CO₂	Los Cuervos	Bogotá	Los Cuervos			Gualanday	Deltaic (Los Cuervos)	260 m (850 ft) (Los Cuervos)	Seal Source
60	Early Paleocene	SALMA	Barco	Guaduas	Barco		Rumiyaco	Gualanday	Fluvial (Barco)	225 m (738 ft) (Barco)	Reservoir	[42][43][46][45][50]
65	Maastrichtian	KT extinction	Catatumbo	Guadalupe				Monserrate	Deltaic-fluvial (Guadalupe)	750 m (2,460 ft) (Guadalupe)	Reservoir	[42][45]
72	Campanian	End of rifting	Colón-Mito Juan					Monserrate				[45][51]
83	Santonian						Villeta/Güagüaquí
86	Coniacian
89	Turonian	Cenomanian-Turonian anoxic event	La Luna	Chipaque	Gachetá	hiatus			Restricted marine (all)	500 m (1,600 ft) (Gachetá)	Source	[42][45][52]
93	Cenomanian	Rift 2		Chipaque	Gachetá				Restricted marine (all)	500 m (1,600 ft) (Gachetá)	Source
100	Albian			Une	Une		Caballos		Deltaic (Une)	500 m (1,600 ft) (Une)	Reservoir	[46][52]
113	Aptian		Capacho	Fómeque			Motema	Yaví	Open marine (Fómeque)	800 m (2,600 ft) (Fómeque)	Source (Fóm)	[43][45][53]
125	Barremian	High biodiversity	Aguardiente	Paja					Shallow to open marine (Paja)	940 m (3,080 ft) (Paja)	Reservoir	[42]
129	Hauterivian	Rift 1	Tibú- Mercedes	Las Juntas	hiatus				Deltaic (Las Juntas)	910 m (2,990 ft) (Las Juntas)	Reservoir (LJun)	[42]
133	Valanginian		Río Negro	Cáqueza Macanal Rosablanca					Restricted marine (Macanal)	2,935 m (9,629 ft) (Macanal)	Source (Mac)	[43][54]
140	Berriasian		Girón	Cáqueza Macanal Rosablanca					Restricted marine (Macanal)	2,935 m (9,629 ft) (Macanal)	Source (Mac)
145	Tithonian	Break-up of Pangea	Jordán	Arcabuco	Buenavista Batá		Saldaña		Alluvial, fluvial (Buenavista)	110 m (360 ft) (Buenavista)	"Jurassic"	[46][55]
150	Early-Mid Jurassic	Passive margin 2	La Quinta	Montebel Noreán	hiatus		Saldaña		Coastal tuff (La Quinta)	100 m (330 ft) (La Quinta)		[56]
201	Late Triassic	Passive margin 2	Mucuchachi	Montebel Noreán			Payandé					[46]
235	Early Triassic	Pangea		hiatus							"Paleozoic"
250	Permian	Pangea
300	Late Carboniferous	Famatinian orogeny						Cerro Neiva ()				[57]
340	Early Carboniferous	Fossil fish Romer's gap		Cuche (355-385)	Farallones ()			Cerro Neiva ()	Deltaic, estuarine (Cuche)	900 m (3,000 ft) (Cuche)
360	Late Devonian	Passive margin 1	Río Cachirí (360-419)	Cuche (355-385)	Farallones ()			Ambicá ()	Alluvial-fluvial-reef (Farallones)	2,400 m (7,900 ft) (Farallones)		[54][58][59][60][61]
390	Early Devonian	High biodiversity	Floresta (387-400) El Tíbet					Ambicá ()	Shallow marine (Floresta)	600 m (2,000 ft) (Floresta)
410	Late Silurian	Silurian mystery	Floresta (387-400) El Tíbet
425	Early Silurian	Silurian mystery	hiatus
440	Late Ordovician	Rich fauna in Bolivia	San Pedro (450-490)		Duda ()
470	Early Ordovician	First fossils	San Pedro (450-490)	Busbanzá (>470±22) Chuscales Otengá	Guape ()		Río Nevado ()	Hígado () Agua Blanca Venado (470-475)				[62][63][64]
488	Late Cambrian	Regional intrusions	Chicamocha (490-515)	Quetame ()	Ariarí ()		SJ del Guaviare (490-590)	San Isidro ()				[65][66]
515	Early Cambrian	Cambrian explosion		Quetame ()				San Isidro ()				[64][67]
542	Ediacaran	Break-up of Rodinia		pre-Quetame		post-Parguaza		El Barro ()	Yellow: allochthonous basement (Chibcha Terrane) Green: autochthonous basement (Río Negro-Juruena Province)		Basement	[68][69]
600	Neoproterozoic	Cariri Velhos orogeny	Bucaramanga (600-1400)				pre-Guaviare					[65]
800	Neoproterozoic	Snowball Earth										[70]
1000	Mesoproterozoic	Sunsás orogeny			Ariarí (1000)			La Urraca (1030-1100)				[71][72][73][74]
1300		Rondônia-Juruá orogeny			pre-Ariarí	Parguaza (1300-1400)		Garzón (1180-1550)				[75]
1400			pre-Bucaramanga					Garzón (1180-1550)				[76]
1600	Paleoproterozoic					Maimachi (1500-1700)		pre-Garzón				[77]
1800		Tapajós orogeny				Mitú (1800)						[75][77]
1950		Transamazonic orogeny				pre-Mitú						[75]
2200		Columbia
2530	Archean	Carajas-Imataca orogeny										[75]
3100	Archean	Kenorland
Sources

Legend

group
important formation
fossiliferous formation
minor formation
(age in Ma)
proximal Llanos (Medina)[note 1]
distal Llanos (Saltarin 1A well)[note 2]

Notes

based on Duarte et al. (2019)[78], García González et al. (2009),[79] and geological report of Villavicencio[80]
based on Duarte et al. (2019)[78] and the hydrocarbon potential evaluation performed by the UIS and ANH in 2009[81]

References

Morzadec et al., 2015, p.331
Rodríguez & Solano, 2000, p.57
Mojica & Villarroel, 1984, p.65
Giraldo Gallego, 2014
Mojica & Villarroel, 1984, p.60
Mojica & Villarroel, 1984, p.63
Geoestudios, 2006, p.68
Rodríguez & Solano, 2000, p.58
Mojica & Villarroel, 1984, p.67
Rodríguez Gutiérrez, 2017, p.75
Mojica & Villarroel, 1984, p.68
Rodríguez & Solano, 2000, p.41
Villarroel & Mojica, 1985, p.85
Mojica & Villarroel, 1984, p.71
Villafañez Cardona, 2012, p.39
Geoestudios, 2006, p.14
Geoestudios, 2006, p.202
Mojica & Villarroel, 1984, p.75
Giroud López, 2014, p.146
Janvier & Villarroel, 2000, p.756
Giroud López, 2014, p.147
Mojica & Villarroel, 1984, p.72
Janvier & Villarroel, 2000, p.729
Mojica & Villarroel, 1984, p.66
Mojica & Villarroel, 1984, p.74
Berry et al., 2000
Gómez Cruz et al., 2015
Janvier & Villarroel, 1998, p.7
Janvier & Villarroel, 1998, p.11
Janvier & Villarroel, 1998, p.12
Janvier & Villarroel, 1998, p.9
Janvier & Villarroel, 1998, p.14
Janvier & Villarroel, 1998, p.15
Janvier & Villarroel, 2000, p.757
Olive et al., 2019, p.4
Olive et al., 2019, p.6
Olive et al., 2019, p.8
Olive et al., 2019, p.17
Olive et al., 2019, p.13
Plancha 172, 1998
Pardo Díaz et al., 2014, p.55
García González et al., 2009, p.27
García González et al., 2009, p.50
García González et al., 2009, p.85
Barrero et al., 2007, p.60
Barrero et al., 2007, p.58
Plancha 111, 2001, p.29
Plancha 177, 2015, p.39
Plancha 111, 2001, p.26
Plancha 111, 2001, p.24
Plancha 111, 2001, p.23
Pulido & Gómez, 2001, p.32
Pulido & Gómez, 2001, p.30
Pulido & Gómez, 2001, pp.21-26
Pulido & Gómez, 2001, p.28
Correa Martínez et al., 2019, p.49
Plancha 303, 2002, p.27
Terraza et al., 2008, p.22
Plancha 229, 2015, pp.46-55
Plancha 303, 2002, p.26
Moreno Sánchez et al., 2009, p.53
Mantilla Figueroa et al., 2015, p.43
Manosalva Sánchez et al., 2017, p.84
Plancha 303, 2002, p.24
Mantilla Figueroa et al., 2015, p.42
Arango Mejía et al., 2012, p.25
Plancha 350, 2011, p.49
Pulido & Gómez, 2001, pp.17-21
Plancha 111, 2001, p.13
Plancha 303, 2002, p.23
Plancha 348, 2015, p.38
Planchas 367-414, 2003, p.35
Toro Toro et al., 2014, p.22
Plancha 303, 2002, p.21
Bonilla et al., 2016, p.19
Gómez Tapias et al., 2015, p.209
Bonilla et al., 2016, p.22
Duarte et al., 2019
García González et al., 2009
Pulido & Gómez, 2001
García González et al., 2009, p.60

Geology

Geoestudios &, ANH. 2006. Cartografía geológica cuenca Cordillera Oriental - Sector Soapaga, 1–239. ANH. Accessed 2017-05-05.
Giraldo Gallego, Diana Andrea. 2014. Antropónimos muiscas en la Colonia (1608-1650). Forma y Función 27. 41–94. Accessed 2017-05-05.
Mojica, Jairo, and Carlos Villarroel. 1984. Contribución al conocimiento de las unidades paleozoicas del área de Floresta (Cordillera Oriental Colombiana; Departamento de Boyacá) y en especial al de la Formación Cuche. Geología Colombiana 13. 55–80. Accessed 2017-05-05.
Pardo Díaz, Marta Yolima; Marta Liliana Gil Padilla; Laura Natalia Garavito Rincón; Pedro Corredor Vargas; Carolina Gutiérrez Barrios; Wilson Parra, and Nancy Amaya Pedraza. 2014. Estudios técnicos, económicos, sociales y ambientales Complejo de Páramos Altiplano Cundiboyacense, 1–546. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt & CORPOBOYACÁ.
Rodríguez Gutiérrez, Madeleidy. 2017. Criterios de Análisis y Validación del Comportamiento de los Túneles con Squeezing en Rocas, 1–541. Escuela Colombiana de Ingeniería Julio Garavito.
Rodríguez Parra, Antonio José, and Orlando Solano Silva. 2000. Mapa Geológico del Departamento de Boyacá - 1:250,000 - Memoria explicativa, 1–120. INGEOMINAS.
Villafañez Cardona, Yohana. 2012. Análisis de procedencia de areniscas cuarzosas del Devónico-Carbonífero de la Formación Floresta (Norte de Santander): Consideraciones paleogeográficas regionales, 1–89. EAFIT.

Paleontology

Zapata Ramirez, Héctor; Alan Pradel; Carlos Martinez Pérez; Philippe Janvier; James C. Lamsdell; Pierre Gueriau; Nicolas Rabet; Philippe Duranleau-Gagnon, and Andres L. Cardenas Rozo. 2019. New insights into Late Devonian vertebrates and associated fauna from the Cuche Formation (Floresta Massif, Colombia). Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology e1620247. 1–18. Accessed 2019-10-09. doi:10.1080/02724634.2019.1620247
Gómez Cruz, Arley de Jesús; Mario Moreno Sánchez, and Alexander Lemus Restrepo. 2015. Diplicnites isp. del Devónico y Carbonífero de Colombia, _. Tercer Simposio Latinoamericano de Icnología, Colonia de Sacramento, Uruguay. Accessed 2017-05-05.
Morzadec, Pierre; Michal Mergl; Carlos Villarroel; Philippe Janvier, and Patrick R. Racheboeuf. 2015. Trilobites and inarticulate brachiopods from the Devonian Floresta Formation of Colombia: a review. Bulletin of Geosciences 90. 331–358. Accessed 2017-05-05.
Giroud López, Marie Joëlle. 2014. El Mar en la Localidad Tipo del Devónico Medio, del Municipio de Floresta - Boyacá, Colombia, 1–174. Universidad de La Habana. Accessed 2017-05-05.
Berry, Christopher M.; Eduardo Morel; Jairo Mojica, and Carlos Villarroel. 2000. Devonian plants from Colombia, with discussion of their geological and palaeogeographical context. Geological Magazine 137. 257–268. Accessed 2017-05-05.
Janvier, Philippe, and Carlos Villarroel. 2000. Devonian vertebrates from Colombia. Palaeontology 43. 729–763. Accessed 2017-05-05.
Janvier, Philippe, and Carlos Villarroel. 1998. Los Peces Devónicos del Macizo de Floresta (Boyacá, Colombia). Consideraciones taxonómicas, bioestratigráficas, biogeográficas y ambientales. Geología Colombiana 23. 3–18. Accessed 2017-05-05.

Maps

Renzoni, Giancarlo, and Humberto Rosas. 2009. Plancha 171 - Duitama - 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
Ulloa, Carlos E.; Álvaro Guerra, and Ricardo Escovar. 1998. Plancha 172 - Paz de Río - 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.
Renzoni, Giancarlo; Humberto Rosas, and Fernando Etayo Serna. 1998. Plancha 191 - Tunja - 1:100,000, 1. INGEOMINAS. Accessed 2017-06-06.

External links

(in Spanish) Peces devónicos de Colombia, diversidad en los mares y ríos de hace 410-355 millones de años

This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.

[81] sed on Duarte et al. (2019)[78], García González et al. (2009),[79] and geological report of Villavicencio[80]

[83] sed on Duarte et al. (2019)[78] and the hydrocarbon potential evaluation performed by the UIS and ANH in 2009[81]

[Morzadec_p331-1] Morzadec et al., 2015, p.331

[Rodriguez_p57-2] Rodríguez & Solano, 2000, p.57

[Mojica_p65-3] Mojica & Villarroel, 1984, p.65

[Giraldo2014-4] Giraldo Gallego, 2014

[Mojica_p60-5] Mojica & Villarroel, 1984, p.60

[Mojica_p63-6] Mojica & Villarroel, 1984, p.63

[Geoestudios_p68-7] Geoestudios, 2006, p.68

[Rodriguez_p58-8] Rodríguez & Solano, 2000, p.58

[Mojica_p67-9] Mojica & Villarroel, 1984, p.67

[Rodriguez2017_p75-10] Rodríguez Gutiérrez, 2017, p.75

[Mojica_p68-11] Mojica & Villarroel, 1984, p.68

[Rodriguez_p41-12] Rodríguez & Solano, 2000, p.41

[Villarroel1987_p85-13] Villarroel & Mojica, 1985, p.85

[Mojica_p71-14] Mojica & Villarroel, 1984, p.71

[Villafanez_p39-15] Villafañez Cardona, 2012, p.39

[Geoestudios_p14-16] Geoestudios, 2006, p.14

[Geoestudios_p202-17] Geoestudios, 2006, p.202

[Mojica_p75-18] Mojica & Villarroel, 1984, p.75

[Giroud_p146-19] Giroud López, 2014, p.146

[Janvier2000_p756-20] Janvier & Villarroel, 2000, p.756

[Giroud_p147-21] Giroud López, 2014, p.147

[Mojica_p72-22] Mojica & Villarroel, 1984, p.72

[Janvier2000_p729-23] Janvier & Villarroel, 2000, p.729

[Mojica_p66-24] Mojica & Villarroel, 1984, p.66

[Mojica_p74-25] Mojica & Villarroel, 1984, p.74

[Berry2000-26] Berry et al., 2000

[Gomez2015-27] Gómez Cruz et al., 2015

[Janvier1998_p7-28] Janvier & Villarroel, 1998, p.7

[Janvier1998_p11-29] Janvier & Villarroel, 1998, p.11

[Janvier1998_p12-30] Janvier & Villarroel, 1998, p.12

[Janvier1998_p9-31] Janvier & Villarroel, 1998, p.9

[Janvier1998_p14-32] Janvier & Villarroel, 1998, p.14

[Janvier1998_p15-33] Janvier & Villarroel, 1998, p.15

[Janvier2000_p757-34] Janvier & Villarroel, 2000, p.757

[Olive2019_p4-35] Olive et al., 2019, p.4

[Olive2019_p6-36] Olive et al., 2019, p.6

[Olive2019_p8-37] Olive et al., 2019, p.8

[Olive2019_p17-38] Olive et al., 2019, p.17

[Olive2019_p13-39] Olive et al., 2019, p.13

[Plancha_172-40] Plancha 172, 1998

[Pardo_p55-41] Pardo Díaz et al., 2014, p.55

[UISANH2009_p27-42] García González et al., 2009, p.27

[UISANH2009_p50-43] García González et al., 2009, p.50

[UISANH2009_p85-44] García González et al., 2009, p.85

[ANH2007_p60-45] Barrero et al., 2007, p.60

[ANH2007_p58-46] Barrero et al., 2007, p.58

[Plancha111_p29-47] Plancha 111, 2001, p.29

[Plancha177_p39-48] Plancha 177, 2015, p.39

[Plancha111_p26-49] Plancha 111, 2001, p.26

[Plancha111_p24-50] Plancha 111, 2001, p.24

[Plancha111_p23-51] Plancha 111, 2001, p.23

[Pulido2001_p32-52] Pulido & Gómez, 2001, p.32

[Pulido2001_p30-53] Pulido & Gómez, 2001, p.30

[Pulido2001_pp21_26-54] Pulido & Gómez, 2001, pp.21-26

[Pulido2001_p28-55] Pulido & Gómez, 2001, p.28

[Correa2019_p49-56] Correa Martínez et al., 2019, p.49

[Plancha303_p27-57] Plancha 303, 2002, p.27

[Terraza2008_p22-58] Terraza et al., 2008, p.22

[Plancha229_pp46_55-59] Plancha 229, 2015, pp.46-55

[Plancha303_p26-60] Plancha 303, 2002, p.26

[Moreno2009_p53-61] Moreno Sánchez et al., 2009, p.53

[Figueroa2015_p43-62] Mantilla Figueroa et al., 2015, p.43

[Manosalva2017_p84-63] Manosalva Sánchez et al., 2017, p.84

[Plancha303_p24-64] Plancha 303, 2002, p.24

[Figueroa2015_p42-65] Mantilla Figueroa et al., 2015, p.42

[Arango2012_p25-66] Arango Mejía et al., 2012, p.25

[Plancha350_p49-67] Plancha 350, 2011, p.49

[Pulido2001_pp17_21-68] Pulido & Gómez, 2001, pp.17-21

[Plancha111_p13-69] Plancha 111, 2001, p.13

[Plancha303_p23-70] Plancha 303, 2002, p.23

[Plancha348_p38-71] Plancha 348, 2015, p.38

[Plancha367_414_p35-72] Planchas 367-414, 2003, p.35

[Toro2014_p22-73] Toro Toro et al., 2014, p.22

[Plancha303_p21-74] Plancha 303, 2002, p.21

[Bonilla2016_p19-75] Bonilla et al., 2016, p.19

[GeoMap2015_p209-76] Gómez Tapias et al., 2015, p.209

[Bonilla2016_p22-77] Bonilla et al., 2016, p.22

[Duarte2019-78] Duarte et al., 2019

[UISANH2009-79] García González et al., 2009

[Pulido2001-80] Pulido & Gómez, 2001

[UISANH2009_p60-82] García González et al., 2009, p.60