Protheosodon

It was a medium-sized animal, smaller than the extant vicuña. The lower incisors, unlike those of more derived proterotheriids such as Diadiaphorus, were relatively small and unspecialized. The lower dentition was complete and there was no trace of diastema. The upper teeth were similar to those of Anisolambda and Polymorphis. The mandible had a very high vertical branch. Its leg bones, firstly attributed to a notoungulate, are incompletely known.

Outdated reconstruction of Protheosodon by Florentino Ameghino, combining its scarce remains with a now outdated assumed affinity with the macraucheniid Theosodon

Protheosodon coniferus was first described in 1897 by Florentino Ameghino, based on fossils found in Deseadan deposits from Chubut Province, Argentina. Other fossils attributed to the genus have been found in slightly older deposits in Colombia.

Protheosodon was initially thought to be a member of Macraucheniidae, mainly based on characteristics from its lower teeth. Subsequent researches has indicated that it was more probably nested within Proterotheriidae, a group of litopterns which, in the course of their evolution, developed horse-like forms, well adapted for running. It may have been a member of Anisolambdinae, the most basal subfamily of proterotheriids. Protheosodon seems to have been part of a collateral branch, contemporary to other, more derived, proterotheriids.[1]

• F. Ameghino. 1897. Mamiferos Cretaceos de la Argentina. Segunda contribucion al conocimiento de la fauna mastologica de las capas con restos de Pyrotherium. Boletin Instituto Geografico Argentino 18:406-521
• F. B. Loomis. 1914. The Deseado Formation of Patagonia 1–232