Teapot Dome scandal

Teapot Dome around the time of the scandal, including Teapot Rock depicted in a c. 1922 postcard

In the early 20th century, the U.S. Navy largely obtained fuel oil by converting coal. To ensure that the Navy would always have enough fuel, President Taft designated several oil-producing areas as naval oil reserves. In 1921, President Harding issued an executive order to transfer control of Teapot Dome Oil Field in Natrona County, Wyoming, and the Elk Hills and Buena Vista Oil Fields in Kern County, California, from the Navy Department to the Department of the Interior. This was not implemented until the next year, when Interior Secretary Fall persuaded Navy Secretary Edwin C. Denby to implement the order.

Later in 1922, Fall leased oil production rights at Teapot Dome to Harry F. Sinclair of Mammoth Oil, a subsidiary of Sinclair Oil Corporation. He also leased the Elk Hills reserve to Edward L. Doheny of Pan American Petroleum and Transport Company. Both leases were issued without competitive bidding; this was legal under the Mineral Leasing Act of 1920.[6]

The lease terms were very favorable to the oil companies, which secretly made Fall a rich man. Fall received a no-interest loan from Doheny of $100,000[7] in November 1921 (equivalent to $1.64 million in 2022[8]). He received other gifts from Doheny and Sinclair totaling about $404,000 (equivalent to $6.63 million in 2022[8]). While the leases were legal, these transactions were not. Fall attempted to keep the deal secret, but the sudden improvement in his standard of living raised suspicions. He paid up his ranch taxes, for example, which had been as much as 10 years past due. Carl Magee, who later founded The Albuquerque Tribune, wrote about this sudden affluence and also brought it to the attention of the Senate investigation.[9]

Albert B. Fall was the first U.S. cabinet official sentenced to prison in the scandal.

In April 1922, a Wyoming oil operator wrote to his senator, John B. Kendrick, angered that Sinclair had been given a contract to the lands in a secret deal. Kendrick did not respond, but two days later on April 15, he introduced a resolution calling for an investigation of the deal.[10] Republican Senator Robert M. La Follette of Wisconsin led an investigation by the Senate Committee on Public Lands. At first, La Follette believed Fall was innocent. However, his suspicions were aroused after his own office in the Senate Office Building was ransacked.[11][12]

Democrat Thomas J. Walsh of Montana, the most junior minority member, led a lengthy inquiry.[13] For two years, Walsh pushed forward while Fall stepped backward, covering his tracks as he went. No evidence of wrongdoing was initially uncovered, as the leases were legal enough, but records kept disappearing mysteriously. Fall had made the leases appear legitimate, but his acceptance of the money was his undoing. By 1924, the remaining unanswered question was how Fall had become so rich so quickly and easily.

Money from the bribes had gone to Fall's cattle ranch and investments in his business. Finally, as the investigation was winding down with Fall apparently innocent, Walsh uncovered a piece of evidence Fall had failed to cover up: Doheny's $100,000 loan to Fall. This discovery broke open the scandal. Civil and criminal suits related to the scandal continued throughout the 1920s. In 1927, the Supreme Court ruled that the oil leases had been corruptly obtained. The Court invalidated the Elk Hills lease in February 1927, and the Teapot Dome lease in October.[14] Both reserves were returned to the Navy.[15]

In 1929, Fall was found guilty of accepting bribes from Doheny.[16][17][11] Conversely, in 1930, Doheny was acquitted of paying bribes to Fall.[18] Further, Doheny's corporation foreclosed on Fall's home[19] in the Tularosa Basin, New Mexico, because of "unpaid loans" that turned out to be that same $100,000 bribe. Sinclair served six months in jail on a charge of jury tampering.[20]

Although Fall was to blame for this scandal, Harding's reputation was permanently sullied[21] because of his involvement with the wrong people. Evidence proving Fall's guilt only arose after Harding's death in 1923.[22]

The Teapot Dome oil field was then idled for 49 years, but went back into production in 1976. After Teapot Dome had earned over $569 million in revenue from the 22 million barrels (3,500,000 m³) of oil extracted over the previous 39 years, the Department of Energy in February 2015 sold the oil field for $45 million to New York–based Stranded Oil Resources Corp.[15][23]

The Supreme Court's ruling in McGrain v. Daugherty (1927) for the first time explicitly established that Congress had the power to compel testimony.[24]

In response to the scandal, the Revenue Act of 1924 gave the chair of the United States House Committee on Ways and Means the right to obtain the tax records of any taxpayer.[25] The Federal Corrupt Practices Act, which regulates campaign finance, was strengthened in 1925.

The Teapot Dome scandal has historically been regarded as the worst such scandal in the United States – the "high water mark" of cabinet corruption. It is often used as a benchmark for comparison with subsequent scandals. In particular it has been compared to the Watergate scandal, in which a cabinet member, Attorney General John N. Mitchell, went to prison, the second time in American history that a member of the cabinet has been incarcerated.[26][9] During the Trump administration, news outlets compared alleged misconduct by members of the Trump cabinet,[27][28][29][30] and specifically by Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke[31][32][33] to the Teapot Dome scandal.

• Little Green House on K Street
• List of federal political scandals in the United States
• Teapot Dome Service Station

Wikimedia Commons has media related to Teapot Dome scandal.

• Bates, James Leonard (1963). The origins of Teapot Dome; progressives, parties and petroleum, 1909–1921. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
• Bennett, Leslie E. (1999). One Lesson From History: Appointment of Special Counsel and the Investigation of the Teapot Dome Scandal. Brookings Institution.
• History.com Editors. "Teapot Dome Scandal". History. 2017.
• Ise, John (1926). The United States Oil Policy. Yale University Press.
• Murphy, Blakely M., ed. (1948). Conservation of oil & gas, a legal history, 1948 (1972 ed.). New York: Arno Press; American Bar Association. ISBN 978-0405045226.
• Noggle, Burl (1965). Teapot Dome : oil and politics in the 1920's. New York: Norton. ISBN 978-0393002973.
• Werner, M. R. (Morris Robert); Starr, John (1959). Teapot Dome. New York: Viking Press.