Unified Patent Court

The Unified Patent Court (UPC) is a common patent court of 17 countries of the European Union,[2] which opened on 1 June 2023.

Unified Patent Court
FormationEstablished by treaty
TypeIntergovernmental organization, court of several EU member states
Legal status
  • Established on 19 January 2022 (provisional application)[1]
  • 1 June 2023 (formal start)
HeadquartersParis (court of first instance, central division)
Luxembourg (court of appeal and registry)
Region served
17 EU countries
Official languages
Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Slovenian, Swedish
Presidium Chair
Klaus Grabinski
Administrative Committee Chair
Johannes Karcher
Registrar
Alexander Ramsay
Websitehttps://www.unified-patent-court.org/

The UPC hears cases regarding infringement and revocation proceedings of European patents (regular European patents unless they were opted out and unitary patents). A single court ruling is directly applicable in the member states that have ratified the UPC Agreement.[3]

The UPC Agreement is the legal basis for the court. It was signed as an intergovernmental treaty in February 2013 by 25 states (all EU member states except Spain, Poland and Croatia) and entered into force after meeting three predefined conditions on 1 June 2023.[4] Provisional application of the UPC Agreement was triggered on 19 January 2022 to enable preparation for the proper functioning of the court after entry into force.[5] While the United Kingdom originally ratified the agreement, it withdrew from the UPC in 2020, following Brexit.[6]

The UPC comprises a Court of First Instance, a Court of Appeal in Luxembourg, an Arbitration and Mediation Center and a common Registry. The Court of First Instance consists of a central division in Paris (with a thematic section in Munich and a further section planned in Milan),[7] along with 13 local and one regional divisions.[8] Before the central division, the language of procedure is English, French or German, while English in combination with a local language is the language of procedure before the local division.

Requesting European patents with unitary effect which apply in all countries where the UPC Agreement is in force upon the grant of European patents is possible since the entry into force of the Unified Patent Court Agreement. Appeal against decisions of the European Patent Office (EPO) regarding the grant of unitary effect is also possible at the court.

Background

European patents are granted by the European Patent Office under the 1973 European Patent Convention (EPC). As of October 2022, 39 countries, including all countries of the European Union, are parties to the EPC. After grant, a European patent essentially[notes 1] becomes "a bundle of national patents" (subject, in some countries,[notes 2] to translation requirements in an official language of that country) in all countries separately, after which renewal fees are also due in all countries where the patent applies. Infringement proceedings in one country have essentially no effect in others, which sometimes leads to parallel litigation regarding the same European patent in different countries, with the possibility of having different outcomes out of these national court proceedings. This fragmented situation has been seen as an impediment to the establishment of an internal market within the European Union.[9]

To reduce translation and litigation costs, the European Union has passed legislation regarding European patents with unitary effect. The European Parliament approved the proposed regulation on 11 December 2012[10][11] and they entered into force in January 2013.[12][13] As Spain and Italy objected to the translation requirements, which featured only the three European Patent Convention languages of English, German and French, they did not originally participate in the regulation, which were thus organized as an enhanced cooperation mechanism between member states, but Italy subsequently joined. Registration of unitary effect is to be organised by the European Patent Office and requires less translations and a single renewal fee for the whole territory. The unitary patent coexists with "regular" European patents.

Unitary patent protection, however, also requires a uniform patent court litigation system. That is provided for with the Unified Patent Court, which is constituted with the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court, signed on 19 February 2013 and which can handle cases related to European patents with and without unitary effect. The Agreement also incorporates many of the provisions of the proposed European Patent Litigation Agreement.[14] The unitary patent provisions apply since the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court entered into force on June 1, 2023.

Locations
Unified Patent Court is located in European Union
Court
Court
Court
Court
Court (planned)
Court (planned)
Arbitration/Mediation
Arbitration/Mediation
Arbitration/Mediation
Arbitration/Mediation
Court of Appeal
Court of Appeal
Locations of the Court of First Instance (Central division, "Court"), the Court of Appeal and the Patent Mediation and Arbitration Centre. In addition, several local and regional divisions of the Court of First Instance exist.

Court of First Instance

The Court of First Instance has a central division with its seat in Paris, and a thematic section in Munich (mechanical engineering cases) and a planned section in Milan.[7] The distribution of cases within the central division is set out in Annex II of the UPCA, which forms an integral part of the Agreement.[15] While formally scheduled to hold a thematic section focusing on chemistry cases,[16] including pharmaceuticals, London does not host a section following Brexit with there other branches of the central division temporarily taking over those cases. A change to the UPC Agreement was adopted in July 2023 to accommodate the replacement of London with Milan as thematic section, while moving part of the expected case load to Munich and Paris.[17] The new distribution will be effective on 26 June 2024, unless one of the UPC member states objects within that term.[7]

Next to the central division, contracting states are free to set up local or regional divisions up to a maximum number depending on case load. The characteristics of the divisions and their territorial jurisdiction[8] is shown below:

TypeState(s) concernedLocationLanguage(s)[18]Number of local judges[8]
CentralAllParisEnglish, French, German
Central (Section) (planned)[7]AllMilanEnglish, French, German
Central (Section)AllMunichEnglish, French, German
RegionalEstonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Sweden
(Nordic-Baltic division)		Stockholm (mainly)[8]English2
LocalAustriaViennaGerman and English1
LocalBelgiumBrusselsDutch, English#, French, German1
LocalDenmarkCopenhagenDanish, English1
LocalFranceParisFrench, English#2
LocalFinlandHelsinkiEnglish, Finnish, Swedish1
LocalGermanyDüsseldorfGerman, English#2
LocalGermanyHamburgGerman, English#2
LocalGermanyMannheimGerman, English#2
LocalGermanyMunichGerman, English#2
LocalItalyMilanItalian, English#2
LocalNetherlandsThe HagueDutch and English2
LocalPortugalLisbonPortuguese and English1
LocalSloveniaLjubljanaSlovenian and English1

#Judge-rapporteur may decide to use a national language for oral proceedings and/or the decision

Unified Patent Court is located in European Union
Unified Patent Court
Unified Patent Court
Unified Patent Court
Unified Patent Court
Unified Patent Court
Unified Patent Court
Unified Patent Court
Unified Patent Court
Unified Patent Court
Unified Patent Court
Unified Patent Court
Unified Patent Court
Unified Patent Court
Unified Patent Court
Unified Patent Court
Unified Patent Court
Unified Patent Court
Locations of Local (green pog) and Regional (orange pog) divisions of the Court of First Instance.
  Country with one local division
  Country with four local divisions
  Country included in Nordic-Baltic regional division
  Country not included in local/regional division

inline Local division
inline Regional division (seat)

inline Regional division (place of hearing)

Of the countries that ratified, Bulgaria, Luxembourg and Malta are not part of a local or regional division, and actions that could normally be brought before the local division of those countries, can be brought before the Central division.

Court of Appeal

The court of Appeal is located in Luxembourg and also serves as the registry.[19]

Other activities

Training of judges takes place in Budapest,[20] and Lisbon and Ljubljana host the seats of a patent mediation and arbitration centre.[19][21] The training centre for judges and candidate judges was officially opened on 13 March 2014 in Budapest.[22]

Operation

Composition of panels of judges

The system includes both legally qualified and technically qualified judges, who would sit in panels[23] of three (Court of First Instance) or five (Court of Appeal) judges. Local divisions may ask (on their own or on the request of one of the parties) to have an extra technically-qualified judge added.[24]

An overview of the composition of the panels of judges is as follows:

Division typeCourtnumber of judgesNationals of the divisionLegally qualified judgesTechnically qualified judges
CentralFirst Instance32A (3)A, B1 (0)B
Local (<50 cases/year)First Instance3 (4)C1[24]30 (1)C
Local (>50 cases/year)First Instance3 (4)C2[25]30 (1)C
RegionalFirst Instance3 (4)C2[26]30 (1)C
Court of AppealAppeal5 (3)B3A2 (0)B

A Of different nationalities[27]
B When dealing with actions under Article 32(1)(i) UPCA (actions concerning decisions of the EPO regarding the administration of the unitary patents)[28]
C Upon request of one of the parties (or the panel)[29]

Proceedings before the Court

The proceedings before the Court comprise three consecutive parts: a written procedure, an interim procedure, and an oral procedure.[30]

Appeal procedure

Appeals against decisions of the Court of First Instance may be brought before the Court of Appeal "within two months of the date of the notification of the decision".[31] In addition, appeals against certain orders (such as an order to produce evidence) issued by the Court of First Instance may also be brought before the Court of Appeal but within a shorter term, i.e. "15 calendar days of the notification of the order to the applicant".[32] Appeals may be brought on both points of law and questions of facts.[33]

The Court of Appeal may refer cases of exceptional importance to the full Court (i.e., the Court of Appeal sitting as a full Court), in order to ensure "unity and consistency of the case law of the Court".[34]

Language of the proceedings

Proceedings before a local or regional division generally take place in the local language of the local or regional division,[35] in an official language of the EPO (English, German or French) if the local or regional division has designated such a language,[36] or in the language in which the patent was granted (English, German or French) if the parties and the panel all agree.[37] Before the central division, proceedings take place in the language in which the patent was granted (English, German or French).[38] The proceedings before the Court of Appeal generally proceed in the language used before the Court of First Instance,[39] or in the language in which the patent was granted (English, German or French) if the parties all agree.[40]

Court fees

To finance its budget, the UPC's own financial revenues notably comprise Court fees,[41] which have been fixed by the UPC's Administrative Committee.[42][43]

Governance

Three committees have been established "to ensure the effective implementation and operation" of the Agreement:[44]

  • An Administrative Committee, composed of one representative of each Contracting Member State[45]
Established upon provisional application, it held its inaugural meeting in February 2022. It is headed by Johannes Karcher (ad interim).[46]
  • A Budget Committee, also composed of one representative of each Contracting Member State[47]
  • An Advisory Committee, comprising "patent judges and practitioners in patent law and patent litigation with the highest recognised competence",[48] amongst others tasked with the advising on selection of judges.[46][49] Willem Hoyng is its Chairman.[50]

A preparatory committee was established enabling entry into force when the required number of ratifications is reached. The committee held its first meeting in March 2013 and was initially headed by Paul van Beukering and later by Alexander Ramsay.[14]

Judges

The list of appointed UPC judges was published on 19 October 2022 and contains 34 legally qualified judges and 51 technically qualified judges.[51][52] Klaus Grabinski (Germany) is president of the Court of Appeal, while Florence Butin (France) is president of the Court of First Instance.[52][51]

Sources of law and applicable law

Article 24 of the Agreement specifies the sources of law that the Court shall base its decisions on:

  • European Union law, including the two EU regulations on the unitary patent
  • The Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
  • The European Patent Convention
  • Other international agreements applicable to patents and binding on all member states
  • National law

For the evaluation of which national law applies, regulations governing private international law (of which the Rome I and Rome II regulations form the cornerstone) that are part of EU law as well as multilateral agreements are leading.[53]

The court is a court of the EU member states, and such not a European Union institution. It is however a court within the European Union. As for other courts in the European Union, the UPC may request, or in the case of the UPC Court of Appeal must request, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) to give a preliminary ruling on matters relating to European Union law, and the decisions of the CJEU are then binding on the UPC.[54]

Substantive law on patent infringement

Art. 25 UPCA defines what constitutes a direct infringement of a patent under the Agreement, and Art. 26 defines what constitutes an indirect infringement thereof.

The Agreement also establishes several bases for the use of patented information without permission of the patent holder. Those bases are applicable to European patents, both with and without unitary effect. The exceptions, given in Article 27, include the following:[55]

Art. 28 UPCA further provides that prior use rights (and rights derived from a prior personal possession of the patented invention) governed under the national law of a Contracting Member State may be invoked as a defense against an alleged patent infringement before the UPC but only for the Contracting Member State(s) concerned by the prior use.

Competence

The Unified Patent Court (UPC) has competence to hear actions regarding European patents with unitary effect and other European patents in force where normally a national court of the countries for which the agreement is applicable.[19] In the case of European patents without unitary effect, during a seven-year transitional period (which the Administrative Council may prolong by up to seven years[60]), actions may also be brought before national courts, and proprietors of patents may opt out from the exclusive competence of the UPC.[19][notes 3] Decisions of the UPC generally cover the full territory of the UPCA Contracting Member States in which the European patent has effect,[61] but may (e.g. in actions regarding infringement) also have effect in other states where the European patent has effect.[62]

Actions may concern inter alia patent infringement, revocation, declarations of non-infringement, and establishments of damages.[63] The proceedings may include a counterclaim from the defendant. The UPC competence covers supplementary protection certificates (SPC) issued for a product protected by a European patent with or without unitary effect.[64]

The existing competences of the European Patent Office (EPO) remain unchanged. An opposition procedure dealing with the validity of the patent but not with infringement may still be brought before the EPO during a nine-month period after the grant of the patent.[65] Decisions by the EPO are valid throughout the territory in which the European patent is valid, which may thus encompass 39 countries. Furthermore, countries may still grant their own national patents, independently of the EPO. Such patents are not litigated in the Unified Patent Court.[66]

Agreement on a Unified Patent Court
TypeIntergovernmental agreement
Signed19 February 2013 (2013-02-19)[4]
LocationBrussels, Belgium
Effective1 June 2023[4]
ConditionAmendment of the Brussels I Regulation, ratification by the three largest patent-granting EU member states in 2012 (France, Germany, Italy) and ratification by at least 13 states in total[67]
Provisional application19 January 2022[1]
Signatories25 EU member states (all except Croatia, Poland and Spain)[4][68]
Parties17[4]
DepositaryGeneral Secretariat of the Council of the European Union[69]
LanguagesEnglish, German and French[70]
Full text
Agreement on a Unified Patent Court at Wikisource

The Agreement on a Unified Patent Court establishes the court as a court of the member states. As a court established by treaty participating in the interoperation of European Union law, it bears similarities to the Benelux Court of Justice.[71] An initial proposal, which shared many similarities with the proposed European Patent Litigation Agreement and included non-EU countries, was found to be incompatible with EU law by the Court of Justice of the European Union, as it would lead to a court not falling fully within the legal system of the European Union, thus being without the possibility to ask prejudicial questions to the EU court of justice.[72] As a result, the court was established by an intergovernmental treaty between the participating states outside the framework of the EU but open only to members of the EU.[73]

Signatures

The agreement was signed on 19 February 2013 in Brussels by 24 states, including all states participating in the enhanced cooperation measures except Bulgaria and Poland, while Italy, which did not join the enhanced cooperation measures, did sign the UPC agreement. It is open to any member state of the European Union (whether they participated in the unitary patent or not), but it is not to other parties to the European Patent Convention. Bulgaria signed the agreement on 5 March after it had finalised its internal procedures.[74][75][76] Meanwhile, Poland decided to wait to see how the new patent system works before joining because of concerns that it would harm its economy.[77] While Italy did not originally participate in the unitary patent regulations, it formally joined them in September 2015.[78] Regardless of the outcome of that process, becoming a party to the UPC agreement will allow the court to handle European patents in force in the country.[79] Spain and Croatia (the latter would accede to the EU in July 2013) are the only EU member states not participating in either the UPC or the unitary patent, but both countries may accede to the unitary patent system at any time.

Entry into force

The agreement entered into force for the first group of ratifiers on June 1, 2023, the first day of the fourth month after all of these three conditions were met:[3][19]

Conditions for entry into forceStatusDate satisfied
Brussels I Regulation amendment entry into forceIn force[80]30 May 2014
Ratification by three EU states with most European patents
in effect in 2012 (France, Germany and Italy (previously UK)[81])		3[4]17 February 2023
Ratification or accession by at least thirteen states17[4]1 August 2017

The entry into force was triggered when Germany deposited its instrument of ratification on 17 February 2023, leading to the scheduled entry into force on 1 June 2023.[4]

For signatories ratifying or acceding after the entry into force of the agreement, their membership takes effect on the first day of the fourth month after the member state deposits its instrument of ratification or accession.[3]

Activities before entry into force

For operations of the Unified Patent Court to commence, the agreement shall have entered into force, and practical arrangements have to be made. To that end, five working groups of the Preparatory Committee have been established to conduct the preparatory work.[82] Preselection of candidate UPC judges took place in 2014,[83] with the first training activities taking place in 2015.[84]

Rules regarding representation before the court were provisionally approved in September 2015. They include the requirements for the European Patent Litigation Certificate (for which academic courses will be accredited) as well as equivalent certificates that are accepted during a transition period. Patent attorneys with a law degree are exempted from the EPLC.[85]

Provisional application

Discussions on a Protocol to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court on Provisional Application were closed in September 2015. The protocol was signed by eight states on 7 October 2015: Denmark, Germany, Hungary, France, Luxembourg, Slovenia, Sweden and the United Kingdom.[86][87][88] Provisional application allows the hiring of judges and moving to the court premises. Provisional application started on 19 January 2022[1] after 13 states (including Germany, France and the United Kingdom) ratified the Unified Patent Court Agreement or indicated to have finished their parliamentary process.[89][90]

Adoption of formal rules

In its inaugural meeting in February 2022, the Administrative Committee approved the Rules on the European Patent Litigation Certificate and other appropriate qualifications, UPC Service and Staff Regulations and Financial Regulations.[46]

Select committee

Beside the completion of the work of the Preparatory Committee, the EPO Select Committee performs preparatory work for implementation of the unitary patent, to be "completed in due time before the entry into operation of the UPC", as unitary patent regulations apply from the date that the UPC agreement enters into force.[91] As of June 2015, the Select Committee expected to complete its work in Autumn 2015.[92]

Ratification

In October 2013, European Council President Herman Van Rompuy stated that the "dream of a single patent still isn't fully fulfilled", and he "urged the EU's member states to ratify the agreement".[93] A list of signatory countries and ratifiers is shown below.[4] The agreement entered into force for all ratifiers on 1 June 2023.

Signatory Signature[68] Institution Conclusion
date		 Majority
needed		 In favour Against AB Deposited[4] Ref.
 Austria 19 February 2013 Federal Council 18 July 2013 50% Majority approval 6 August 2013 [94][95]
National Council 6 July 2013 50% Majority approval[lower-alpha 1] [97][98]
Presidential Assent -
 Belgium 19 February 2013 Senate 13 March 2014 50% 46 8 0 6 June 2014 [99][100]
Chamber of Representatives 23 April 2014 50% 107 19 0 [101][102]
Royal Assent 27 May 2014 - Granted [99]
 Bulgaria 5 March 2013[lower-alpha 2] National Assembly 8 April 2016 50% Approved 3 June 2016 [103]
Presidential Assent 18 April 2016 - Granted [104]
 Cyprus 19 February 2013 House of Representatives
Presidential Assent -
 Czech Republic 19 February 2013 Chamber of Deputies
Senate
Presidential Assent -
 Denmark 19 February 2013 Folketing 29 April 2014 50%[105][lower-alpha 3] 90 21 0 20 June 2014 [107][108]
Referendum 25 May 2014 50% 62.5% 37.5% - [109]
Royal Assent 2 June 2014 - Granted [110]
 Estonia 19 February 2013 Riigikogu 4 June 2017 50% 86 0 1 1 August 2017 [111]
Presidential Assent 14 June 2017 - Granted [112]
 Finland 19 February 2013 Parliament 8 December 2015 Approved 19 January 2016 [113][114][115]
Presidential Assent 8 January 2016 - Granted [116]
 France[lower-alpha 4] 19 February 2013 National Assembly 13 February 2014 50%[117][118] Approved 14 March 2014 [119][120][121]
Senate 21 November 2013 50%[118][122] Majority approval [119][123][124]
Presidential Assent 24 February 2014 - Granted [119]
 Germany[lower-alpha 4] 19 February 2013 Bundestag 10 March 2017 Approved[125] 17 February 2023 [126]
Bundesrat 31 March 2017 Approved [127]
Federal Constitutional Court 13 February 2020 Bundestag approval voided [128]
Bundestag 26 November 2020 66.6% 571 73 [129]
Bundesrat 18 December 2020 66.6% Unanimously [130]
Federal Constitutional Court 23 June 2021 Complaints held inadmissible

[131]

Presidential Assent 12 August 2021 - Granted [132]
 Greece 19 February 2013 Parliament
Presidential Promulgation -
 Hungary 19 February 2013 National Assembly
Presidential Assent -
 Ireland 19 February 2013 Dáil Éireann 50%[133]
Seanad Éireann 50%[133]
Referendum 50%[133][134]
Presidential Assent -
 Italy 19 February 2013 Chamber of Deputies 14 September 2016 302 108 25 10 February 2017 [135]
Senate 18 October 2016 161 30 7 [135]
Presidential Assent 3 November 2016 - Granted [136]
 Latvia 19 February 2013 Parliament 30 March 2017 Approved 11 January 2018 [137][138]
Presidential Assent 12 April 2017 Granted [138]
 Lithuania 19 February 2013 Parliament 3 November 2016 Approved 24 August 2017 [139]
Presidential Assent 8 November 2016 - Granted [139]
 Luxembourg 19 February 2013 Chamber of Deputies 18 March 2015 58 0 0 22 May 2015 [140]
Grand Ducal Assent 12 April 2015 - Granted [141]
 Malta 19 February 2013 House of Representatives 21 January 2014 50%[142] Unanimous 9 December 2014 [143][144]
 Netherlands 19 February 2013 Senate 28 June 2016 Approved 14 September 2016 [145][146]
House of Representatives 17 June 2016 Approved [147][148]
Royal Promulgation 29 June 2016 - Granted [149]
 Portugal 19 February 2013 Assembly 10 April 2015 Approved 28 August 2015 [150]
Presidential Assent 6 August 2015 - Granted [151]
 Romania 19 February 2013 House of Representatives
Senate
Presidential Assent -
 Slovakia 19 February 2013 National Council
Presidential Assent -
 Slovenia 19 February 2013 National Assembly 22 September 2016 48 11 15 October 2021 [152][153][154]
Presidential Assent 30 September 2016 - Granted [154]
 Sweden 19 February 2013 Riksdagen 27 May 2014 by acclamation 5 June 2014 [155][156]
 United Kingdom[lower-alpha 4] 19 February 2013 House of Commons (IPA 2014) 12 March 2014[lower-alpha 5] 50%[157] Approved 26 April 2018 [158][159]
House of Lords (IPA 2014) 30 July 2013[lower-alpha 5] 50%[157] Approved [158][160]
Royal Assent (IPA 2014) 14 May 2014[lower-alpha 5] - Granted [158]
House of Commons (Patents Order 2016) 2 March 2016[lower-alpha 5] 50% Approved [161][162]
House of Lords (Patents Order 2016) 10 March 2016[lower-alpha 5] 50% Approved [161][163]
Royal Assent (Patents Order 2016) 12 March 2016[lower-alpha 5] - Granted [164]
Denunciation - 20 July 2020 [4][165]
= States which have ratified the agreement
= States which must ratify the agreement for it to enter into force
Notes
  1. SPÖ, ÖVP, FPÖ and Team Stronach voted for and Grüne and BZÖ voted against the Unified Patent Court law.[96]
  2. The date reported by the agreements database of the depositary is 19 February 2013, while news reports and a dedicated EU patent ratification page of the depositary reports 5 March 2013.[68]
  3. In combination with a successful referendum, a 50% majority is required in the Folketing. If no referendum is held, a 5/6 majority of the Folketing is required.[106]
  4. Ratification required for entry into force.
  5. These instruments serve for the implementation of the UPC agreement, but do not constitute approval acts of the Agreement, as such acts are formally not required in the UK. See #Ratification notes for details regarding the ratification procedure

Ratification notes
Denmark

The Ministry of Justice in Denmark issued its opinion in May 2013 that a referendum, or five-sixths majority in the Folketing was necessary for Denmark to ratify the agreement because of its constitutional requirements on the transfer of sovereignty.[106][166] The Danish People's Party and Red-Green Alliance, which controlled enough seats in the Folketing (22 and 12 respectively, or a little more than one sixth of the 179 seats) to block ratification without referendum, stated that a referendum should be held.[106] The People's Party said that it would support the UPC if the governing parties promise to hold a referendum on the proposed EU Banking Union or to increase restrictions on the distribution of welfare benefits to foreign nationals in Denmark.[167] After a parliamentary agreement could not be reached, a UPC referendum was held, together with the EP election, on 25 May 2014.[168] The Danish constitution states that the referendum defaults to a yes result unless at least 30% of all eligible to vote and more than 50% if the votes cast vote no.[169] The referendum resulted in 62.5% yes votes,[109] leading to the approval of the ratification act, with a deposit of the instrument of ratification on 20 June 2014.[4]

Germany

In June 2017, Ingve Stjerna, a German lawyer, submitted a constitutional complaint against the German Unified Patent Court Agreement Act. Upon receiving the complaint, the Federal Constitutional Court asked German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier not to sign the law. Steinmeier complied and the ratification was then suspended.[170][171] The complaint alleged a violation of the right to democracy, "democratic deficits and deficits in rule of law with regard to the regulatory powers of the organs of the UPC", "perceived lack of an independent judiciary under the UPC" and nonconformance of the UPC with EU law.[172][173][174] It was believed that the last ground of the complaint, the alleged incompatibility of the UPC Agreement with EU law, might lead the Federal Constitutional Court to refer one or more questions to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), "which would mean a further delay of at least 15-24 months".[174] Stjerna refrained from publicly commenting on the substance of the complaint. He nevertheless indicated to the JUVE magazine that "he has received neither the support of third parties nor financial backing".[175] The complaint was upheld on 20 March 2020 with regards to the unconstitutionality of the parliamentary procedure approving the agreement in the Bundestag.[176] The German government introduced a new bill to ratify the agreement, with the required two-thirds majority, to Parliament in June 2020.[177]

In December 2020, after the new bill had been approved by both the Bundestag and the Bundesrat, two new constitutional complaints were filed against the new bill.[178][179][180] These complaints led the Federal Constitutional Court to ask the German President not to sign the law.[181] However, they were ruled inadmissible by the court in July 2021.[131]

Hungary

Following a request for interpretation by the government the Constitutional Court of Hungary ruled that the UPC was incompatible with the Constitution of Hungary, and as such it would require amending to ratify.[182]

Ireland

Ireland initially scheduled a referendum on a constitutional amendment, required to ratify the agreement, for the autumn of 2013,[183] but it was subsequently postponed to an unscheduled date after the 2014 European Parliament election.[184][185] The Irish minister responsible for the matter, Richard Bruton, confirmed in May 2014 that a constitutional referendum would be held but that the timing had not been decided by the government.[186] The Irish government later revealed in its legislation programme that it has planned to publish the required "Amendment of the Constitution" bill in 2015 to amend Article 29 of the Constitution to recognise the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court,[187] and after parliamentary approval will be put to a referendum. In May 2015, the Irish Minister for Children and Youth Affairs stated that his government did not plan for holding any referendums during the remainder of its legislative term and so the Irish referendum and the ratification of the UPC would be postponed to after April 2016.[188]

Netherlands

In the Netherlands, European patents apply to the whole Kingdom, except for Aruba. The ratification by the Netherlands in 2016 however only applied to the European part of the Kingdom. On the request of Curaçao and Sint Maarten, and after a positive advice by the European Commission, the application was extended to Curaçao and Sint Maarten as well as Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba.[189]

United Kingdom

In the United Kingdom, there is no requirement for a formal law approving of treaties before their ratification, but the Ponsonby Rule is that they are laid before Parliament with an explanatory memorandum,[190] which the government did for the UPC Agreement on 23 June 2013.[191] The Intellectual Property Act 2014 was approved by Parliament and entered into force on 14 May 2014. Section 17 empowers the Secretary of State to make provision by order for giving effect in the United Kingdom to jurisdiction for the Unified Patent Court if a draft of the order has been approved by Parliament.[192] That means that ratification of the UPC agreement will not take place before Parliament's approval of the related implementation orders. The first order, the Patents (European Patent with Unitary Effect and Unified Patent Court) Order 2015, was submitted by the government on 10 June 2014 for a technical review with a 2 September 2014 deadline for replies.[55] The government presented the results of its technical review consultation in March 2015, and on its basis, it began the process to complete the final version of its draft order to Parliament.[193] In June 2015, the UK Intellectual Property Office stated, "It is the Government's intention for our domestic preparations [for ratification of the UPC] to be completed by Spring 2016".[194] The Government laid the domestic implementing order before Parliament 21 January 2016.[195] A second Statutory Instrument is needed to endorse the UPC Protocol on Privileges and Immunities, which the UK signed on 14 December 2016.[196] The second Statutory Instrument will need to be finalised and laid before the Westminster and Scottish Parliaments, which will subject the Statutory Instrument to an affirmative procedure in order to complete the ratification of the UPC.[197]

The UK government announced on 27 February 2020 that "the UK will not be seeking involvement in the UP/UPC system. Participating in a court that applies EU law and [that is] bound by the CJEU is inconsistent with our aims of becoming an independent self-governing nation."[198]

On 20 July 2020 the UK formally withdrew its ratification of the treaty.[165]

Amendment of the Brussels I regulation

A proposal for amendments of the Brussels I regulation was presented by the European Commission on 26 July 2013, and it needed to be approved by the Council of the European Union and the European Parliament.[199] In a 523–98 vote, the European Parliament approved an amended version of the amendment on 15 April 2014.[200] The same amendment was adopted by the Council of the European Union in an Ecofin Council meeting on 6 May 2014,[201] and it formally entered into force on 30 May 2014 as Regulation 542/2014.[80] Regulation 542/2014 amends the recast Brussels I Regulation 1215/2012, which is applicable from January 2015, and asserts that the Unified Patent Court has jurisdiction within the European Union if a contracting state to the Agreement would have jurisdiction in a matter that is regulated by the Agreement. It also renders the jurisdiction rules applicable in cases between parties in one EU country and parties in a non-EU country, a situation in which national law, rather than EU law, normally applies.

Spain and Italy both filed individual actions for annulment of the unitary patent regulation with the European Court of Justice (CJEU cases C-274/11 and C-295/11) in May 2011, arguing the use of enhanced cooperation was improper and the introduced trilingual (English, French, German) language regime system for the unitary patent, which they viewed as discriminatory to other EU languages, would be non-compliant with the EU treaties because of distorting competition, causing a misuse of Council powers and functioning detrimental to the internal market.[202][203] On 16 April 2013, CJEU rejected both complaints.[202][204]

In March 2013, Spain filed two new actions for annulment (CJEU cases C-146/13[205] and C-147/13[206]) of (part of) the two unitary patent regulations, arguing that there is a "misapplication of the Meroni case law" in the delegation of administrative tasks to the European Patent Office, as its setting and distributing of renewal fees are not subject to the necessary EU supervision.[207] The cases were subject to court hearing on 1 July 2014.[208][209] Advocate-General Yves Bot published his opinion on 18 November 2014, suggesting that both actions be dismissed (ECLI:EU:C:2014:2380 and ECLI:EU:C:2014:2381). If the Spanish complaints had been upheld by the Court, that could have delayed or blocked the introduction of the unitary patent.[210] The court handed down its decisions on 5 May 2015 as ECLI:EU:C:2015:298 and ECLI:EU:C:2015:299, fully dismissing the Spanish claims.

See also

Notes
  1. Opposition, limitation and revocation proceedings are still available centrally after a patent's grant.
  2. See also London Agreement (2000).
  3. Once opted out, a European patent without unitary effect remains outside the jurisdiction of the UPC for the lifetime of the patent unless the opt-out is later withdrawn.

References
  1. "Austria closes the loop – the Protocol on Provisional Application of the UPC Agreement has entered into force | Unified Patent Court". www.unified-patent-court.org. 19 January 2022. Retrieved 19 January 2022.
  2. Agreement on a Unified Patent Court, Article 84(1): "This Agreement shall be open for signature by any Member State on 19 February 2013."; Article 84(4): "This Agreement shall be open to accession by any Member State."; and Article 2(b): "Member State" means a Member State of the European Union."
  3. "Agreement on a Unified Patent Court". Official Journal of the European Union. Publications Office of the European Union. 56 (C_175): 2013/C175. 20 June 2013. doi:10.3000/1977091X.C_2013.175.eng. Retrieved 25 June 2013.
  4. "Agreement on a Unified Patent Court". Council of the European Union. Retrieved 5 March 2013.
  5. "Austria closes the loop – the Protocol on Provisional Application of the UPC Agreement has entered into force | Unified Patent Court". www.unified-patent-court.org. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
  6. "UK Withdrawal from the UPCA | Unified Patent Court". www.unified-patent-court.org. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
  7. "Decision of the Administrative Committee under Article 87 (2) UPCA amending the Agreement" (PDF). Administrative Committee of the Unified Patent Court. 26 June 2023. Retrieved 5 July 2023.
  8. "Set-up of local and regional divisions of the Court of First Instance of the Unified Patent Court" (PDF). Administrative Committee of the Unified Patent Court. 8 July 2022. Retrieved 20 December 2022.
  9. UPCA, first recital.
  10. "Parliament approves EU unitary patent rules". European Parliament. 11 December 2012. Retrieved 11 December 2012.
  11. Fox, Benjamin (12 December 2012). "'Historic day' as EU patent deal ends 40-year wait". EUobserver.com. Retrieved 14 December 2012.
  12. "Regulation 1257/2012". Official Journal of the European Union. L 361/1. 31 December 2012. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
  13. "Council Regulation 1260/2012". Official Journal of the European Union. L 361/89. 31 December 2012. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
  14. "Establishment of the Unified Patent Court Preparatory Committee" (PDF). Retrieved 12 May 2013.
  15. Art. 7(2), second sentence, UPCA
  16. "Deal reached: Unitary patent court to have three homes". Science/Business. 27 June 2012. Archived from the original on 29 October 2013. Retrieved 29 June 2012.
  17. "Alexander Ramsay: "The London question won't delay the UPC"". JUVE Patent. 15 December 2021. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
  18. "Language of Proceedings". Unified Patent Court. Retrieved 19 May 2023.
  19. "Unitary patent - frequently asked questions". European Patent Organisation. Archived from the original on 18 February 2013. Retrieved 23 February 2013.
  20. Art. 19(1), second sentence, UPCA: "The facilities for [the training framework for judges] shall be situated in Budapest."
  21. Art. 35(1) UPCA: "A patent mediation and arbitration centre ("the Centre") is hereby established. It shall have its seats in Ljubljana and Lisbon."
  22. "Training Centre for European patent judges opened in Budapest". epo.org. European Patent Office. 13 March 2014. Retrieved 30 March 2014.
  23. Art. 8 and 9 UPCA
  24. Art. 8(2) UPCA
  25. Art. 8(3), first sentence, UPCA
  26. Art. 8(4), UPCA
  27. Art. 8(6) and 9(1) UPCA
  28. Art. 8(6), second sentence, and 9(2) UPCA
  29. Art. 8(5) UPCA
  30. Art. 52(1) UPCA
  31. Art. 73(1) UPCA
  32. Art. 73(2) UPCA
  33. Art. 73(3) UPCA
  34. Art. 21(2) and 35(3) Statute of the UPC (Annex I to the UPCA)
  35. Art. 49(1) UPCA
  36. Art. 49(2) UPCA
  37. Art. 49(3) and (4) UPCA
  38. Art. 49(6) UPCA
  39. Art. 50(1) UPCA
  40. Art. 50(2) UPCA
  41. Art. 36(1) and (2), and 70 UPCA
  42. Art. 36(3) UPCA
  43. "Table of Court Fees" (PDF). Administrative Committee of the Unified Patent Court. 8 July 2022. Retrieved 9 August 2022.
  44. Art. 11 UPCA
  45. Art. 12 UPCA
  46. "Announcement on the Unified Patent Court Administrative Committee's inaugural meetin". Unified Patent Court. 23 February 2022. Retrieved 26 February 2022.
  47. Art. 13 UPCA
  48. Art. 14(2) UPCA
  49. Art. 14(1) UPCA
  50. "Advisory committee | Unified Patent Court". www.unified-patent-court.org. Retrieved 17 March 2023.
  51. "Unified Patent Court judicial appointments and Presidium elections | Unified Patent Court". www.unified-patent-court.org. 19 October 2022. Retrieved 22 October 2022.
  52. Sandys, Amy (20 October 2022). "UPC divisions demonstrate clout with choice of experienced legal judges". JUVE Patent. Retrieved 22 October 2022.
  53. Art. 24(2) UPCA
  54. Art. 21 UPCA. See also Art. 38 Statute of the UPC (Annex I to the UPCA).
  55. "Technical Review and Call for Evidence on Secondary Legislation Implementing the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court and EU Regulations Establishing the Unitary Patent" (PDF). Annex C: Draft Statutory Instrument. Intellectual Property Office. 10 June 2014.
  56. Art. 27(a) UPCA.
  57. Art. 27(c) UPCA.
  58. Art. 27(f) UPCA.
  59. Art. 27(k) UPCA.
  60. Art. 83(5), second sentence, UPCA: "(...) the Administrative Committee may decide to prolong the transitional period by up to seven years."
  61. Art. 34 UPCA
  62. Ohly, Ansgar (2022). The jurisdiction of European courts in patent disputes (PDF). ISBN 978-3-89605-220-9. Retrieved 13 August 2022. {{cite book}}: |work= ignored (help)
  63. Art. 32(1) UPCA
  64. Art. 3(b) UPCA
  65. Article 99(1) EPC
  66. Art. 32(2) UPCA
  67. Art. 89(1) UPCA
  68. "Unitary patent – ratification progress". European Commission. Retrieved 23 February 2013.
  69. Art. 84(2) UPCA
  70. Art. 88(1) UPCA
  71. Pepijn van Gils (April 2013). "Het Eenheidsoctrooi, de haalbaarheid van het nieuwe octrooisysteem van de EU" (in Dutch). p. 60. Retrieved 11 May 2013. De huidige opzet van het gemeenschappelijke Europees octrooigerecht is er één die te vergelijken is instelling van het Benelux gerechtshof.
  72. "The draft agreement on the creation of a European and Community Patent Court is not compatible with European Union law" (PDF). Court of Justice of the European Union. 8 March 2011. Retrieved 8 March 2013.
  73. "The long road to unitary patent protection in Europe" (PDF). Council of the European Union. 17 December 2012. Retrieved 8 February 2013.
  74. "Signing of the Unified Patent Court agreement" (PDF). Council of the European Union. 19 February 2013. Retrieved 19 February 2013.
  75. "Unitary patent – ratification progress". European Commission. Retrieved 19 February 2013.
  76. "Single European Patent: a major achievement but still some way to go". European Commission (Press release). 18 February 2013. Retrieved 18 February 2013.
  77. "Will Poland join the Unitary Patent system?". World Intellectual Property Review. 5 February 2013. Retrieved 9 February 2013.
  78. "Italy joins the unitary patent". European Commission. 30 September 2015. Retrieved 30 September 2015.
  79. Wishart, Ian (14 February 2013). "Countries to sign up to unitary patent system". Retrieved 19 February 2013.
  80. "Regulation (EU) No 542/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 amending Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 as regards the rules to be applied with respect to the Unified Patent Court and the Benelux Court of Justice". Official Journal of the European Union. L (163): 1. 29 May 2014. Retrieved 5 January 2019.
  81. "German Bundestag approves ratification bill on the Unified Patent Court Agreement". EPO. 26 November 2020.
  82. "Roadmap of the preparatory committee of the Unified Patent Court" (PDF). Unified Patent Court. 11 June 2013.
  83. "Expression of Interests of Candidate Judges: letters issued". UPC preparatory commission. 11 September 2014. Retrieved 10 September 2015.
  84. "9th Meeting of the Preparatory Committee". UPC preparatory commission. 5 May 2015. Retrieved 10 September 2015.
  85. "Draft proposal for rules on the European Patent Litigation Certificate and other appropriate qualifications". UPC preparatory commission. 9 September 2015. Retrieved 10 September 2015.
  86. "10th meeting of the Preparatory Committee - 10 July 2015". UPC preparatory commission. 16 July 2015. Retrieved 10 September 2015.
  87. "Council of EU - Newsroom". newsroom.consilium.europa.eu.
  88. Rijnswou, Sander Van (13 November 2015). "DeltaPatents : Unitary Patent".
  89. "Protocol to the UPC Agreement" (PDF). Unified Patent Court preparatory committee. 1 October 2015.
  90. "Agreement". www.consilium.europa.eu. Archived from the original on 11 November 2020. Retrieved 29 December 2020.
  91. "Implementing the Patent Package: Fourth progress report". Council of the EU. 21 May 2015.
  92. "Business-friendly fee pattern adopted for the unitary patent". EPO. 25 June 2015.
  93. "Symposium celebrates 40 years of the EPC". epo.org. European Patent Office. 17 October 2013. Retrieved 26 October 2013. Looking forward to the unitary patent and the Unified Patent Court (UPC), he added that the "dream of a single patent still isn't fully fulfilled" and urged the EU's member states to ratify the agreement. He said the proposals would mean "less time, less money, less worry - and larger markets" for European companies.... We cannot afford to wait a minute longer," he said.
  94. "Parlamentskorrespondenz Nr. 680 vom 18.07.2013". Parliament of Austria (in German). Retrieved 19 July 2013.
  95. "823. Sitzung / 1" (PDF). parlament.gv.at (Bundesrat). 18 July 2013. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
  96. "Übereinkommen über ein Einheitliches Patentgericht (2447 d.B.)". Parliament of Austria (in German). Retrieved 13 July 2013.
  97. "XXIV. GP, 216. Sitzung / 1" (PDF). parlament.gv.at (Nationalrat). 5 July 2013. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
  98. "PK-Nr. 661/2013". Parlament.gv.at. 29 August 2013. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
  99. "S. 5-2478 - Fiche du dossier". Belgian Senate. Retrieved 8 February 2014.
  100. "5‑144, Sénat de Belgique, Session ordinaire 2013‑2014, Séances plénières, Jeudi 13 mars 2014, Séance de l'après‑midi, Compte rendu provisoire / 5‑144, Belgische Senaat, Gewone Zitting 2013‑2014, Plenaire vergaderingen, Donderdag 13 maart 2014, Namiddagvergadering, Voorlopig verslag". Belgian Senate. Retrieved 14 March 2014.
  101. "Document parlementaire 53K3454 Projet de loi portant assentiment à l'Accord relatif à une juridiction unifiée du brevet, fait à Bruxelles le 19 février 2013". Belgian Chamber of Representatives. Archived from the original on 15 April 2014. Retrieved 15 April 2014.
  102. "CRIV 53 PLEN 198: CHAMBRE DES REPRÉSENTANTS DE BELGIQUE, COMPTE RENDU INTÉGRAL, SÉANCE PLÉNIÈRE, Mercredi 23-04-2014 Après-midi - CRIV 53 PLEN 198: BELGISCHE KAMER VAN VOLKSVERTEGENWOORDIGERS, INTEGRAAL VERSLAG, PLENUMVERGADERING, Woensdag 23-04-2014 Namiddag" (PDF). Belgian Chamber of Representatives. 23 April 2014. Retrieved 24 April 2014.
  103. "Народно събрание на Република България - Законопроекти". www.parliament.bg.
  104. "Народно събрание на Република България - Закони". www.parliament.bg.
  105. "Folketinget - ERU, Alm. del - 2012-13 - Bilag 243: Notat om, hvorvidt dansk tilslutning til aftale om en fælles europæisk patentdomstol forudsætter anvendelse af proceduren i grundlovens § 20, fra justitsministeren". Ft.dk. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
  106. "MINISTRY: EU patent court may require referendum". Politiken. 7 May 2013. Retrieved 10 May 2013.
  107. Folketinget, Christiansborg. "Folketinget - L 22 - 2013-14 (oversigt): Forslag til lov om en fælles patentdomstol m.v". Ft.dk. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
  108. Folketinget, Christiansborg. "L 22 Forslag til lov om en fælles patentdomstol m.v. 3.behandling Afstemning". Ft.dk. Retrieved 1 May 2014.
  109. "FOLKEAFSTEMNING SØNDAG 25. MAJ 2014: RESULTATER - HELE LANDET". Statistics Denmark. 26 May 2014. Retrieved 26 May 2014.
  110. "Lov om en fælles patentdomstol m.v." Retsinformation. 3 June 2014.
  111. "The Riigikogu passed 21 Acts and a Resolution". Parliament of Estonia. 14 June 2017.
  112. "Estonian UPC legislative process nears completion". lexology. 14 June 2017.
  113. "HE 45/2015 vp". www.eduskunta.fi.
  114. http://www.finlex.fi/sv/esitykset/he/2015/20150045.pdf
  116. "Legal Alert - Finland Ratifies the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court". Borenius. 19 January 2016.
  117. "Les votes à l'Assemblée nationale - Fiche n° 44 - Assemblée nationale". Assemblee-nationale.fr. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
  118. "CONSTITUTION DE LA Ve REPUBLIQUE" (PDF). senat.fr. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
  119. "Projet de loi autorisant la ratification de l'accord relatif à une juridiction unifiée du brevet: Les étapes de la discussion". Senate of France (in French). Retrieved 9 November 2013.
  120. "PROJET DE LOI autorisant la ratification de l'accord relatif à une juridiction unifiée du brevet" (in French). 13 February 2014. Retrieved 13 February 2014.
  121. "Union européenne : juridiction unifiée du brevet (dossier législatif sur le site de l'Assemblée nationale)" (in French). 14 February 2014. Retrieved 14 February 2014.
  122. "Règlement Du Senat Et Instruction Generale Du Bureau". Senat.fr. 25 November 1993. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
  123. "Sénat - Compte rendu analytique officiel du 21 novembre 2013". Senat.fr. 21 November 2013. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
  124. "Séance du 21 novembre 2013 (compte rendu intégral des débats)". Senat.fr. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
  125. "Bundesverfassungsgericht - Press - Act of Approval to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court is void". www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de.
  126. http://dipbt.bundestag.de/dip21/btd/18/111/1811137.pdf
  127. http://dipbt.bundestag.de/dip21/brd/2016/0751-16B.pdf
  128. "Federal Constitutional Court - decision | Unified Patent Court". www.unified-patent-court.org.
  129. blogger, Kluwer Patent (26 November 2020). "Preparatory Committee: Unified Patent Court an important step closer". Kluwer Patent Blog.
  130. "Federal Council approves law required for UPC ratification".
  131. "2 BvR 2216/20, 2 BvR 2217/20. Unsuccessful applications for preliminary injunction against the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court". Bundesverfassungsgericht. 9 July 2021. Retrieved 10 July 2021.
  132. "What the decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court means for the Unified Patent Court's timeplan". Unified Patent Court preparatory committee. 18 August 2021. Retrieved 20 August 2021.
  133. "Irish Constitution" (PDF). taoiseach.gov.ie. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
  134. "Constitutional Referendum in Ireland". Citizensinformation.ie. 18 July 2013. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
  135. "Parlamento Italiano - Disegno di legge C. 3867 - 17ª Legislatura". www.senato.it.
  136. informatici, Segretariato generale della Presidenza della Repubblica-Servizio sistemi. "Atti firmati nella settimana dal Presidente Sergio Mattarella". Quirinale.
  137. "LP teksts". titania.saeima.lv.
  138. "Latvia's law to ratify UPC Agreement to enter into force on 1 January 2018". www.bristowsupc.com.
  139. "Lietuvos Respublikos įstatymas dėl Susitarimo dėl Bendro patentų teismo ratifikavimo". Seimas. 8 November 2016. Retrieved 26 November 2016.
  140. "6696 - Projet de loi portant approbation de l'Accord relatif à une juridiction unifiée du brevet, signé à Bruxelles, le 19 février 2013". Chambre des Députés (in French). Retrieved 23 June 2014.
  141. "Mémorial A n° 72 de 2015 - Legilux". legilux.public.lu.
  142. "Constitution" (PDF). Retrieved 2 February 2014.
  143. "Motion details". Parlament.mt. 21 October 2013. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
  144. "MINUTI KAMRA TAD‑DEPUTATI IT‑TNAX‑IL PARLAMENT SEDUTA NRU. 110". parlament.mt. 21 January 2014. Retrieved 2 February 2014.
  145. "Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal - Overeenkomst betreffende een eengemaakt octrooigerecht (34.411)". www.eerstekamer.nl.
  146. "Eerste Kamer der Staten-Generaal - Stenogram van de plenaire vergadering van dinsdag 28 juni 2016". Archived from the original on 16 August 2016. Retrieved 28 June 2016.
  147. "Goedkeuring van de op 19 februari 2013 te Brussel tot stand gekomen Overeenkomst betreffende een eengemaakt octrooigerecht (Trb. 2013, 92 en 2016, 1)". www.tweedekamer.nl (in Dutch).
  148. https://www.eerstekamer.nl/behandeling/20160616/stemmingsoverzicht_tweede_kamer/document3/f=/vk4zhq98j3c0.pdf
  149. https://www.eerstekamer.nl/9370000/1/j9vvhwtbnzpbzzc/vk79ccw668zq/f=y.pdf
  150. "DetalheIniciativa". www.parlamento.pt.
  151. "Decreto do Presidente da República n.o 90/2015 de 6 de agosto". Diário da República, 1.a série (152): 5416. Retrieved 6 August 2015.
  152. "Portal DZ - Izbran zakon / akt".
  153. "Zakon o ratifikaciji Sporazuma o enotnem sodišču za patente (MSESP)". Pravno-Informacijski sistem (in Slovenian). Retrieved 12 July 2014.
  154. "Slovenia passes law on ratification of the UPC Agreement". www.bristowsupc.com.
  155. "Ett enhetligt patentskydd i EU". riksdagen.se. 18 March 2014. Retrieved 22 March 2014.
  156. "Betänkande 2013/14:NU21 Ett enhetligt patentskydd i EU". riksdagen.se. 6 March 2014. Retrieved 3 April 2014.
  157. "Bills - UK Parliament". Parliament.uk. 21 April 2010. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
  158. "Intellectual Property Bill [HL] 2013-14". Parliament of the United Kingdom. Retrieved 15 July 2013.
  159. "Commons Hansard text for 14 March 2014 (pt 0002)". Publications.parliament.uk. 12 March 2014. Retrieved 14 March 2014.
  160. "Lords Hansard text for 30 July 2013 (pt 0001)". Publications.parliament.uk. 30 July 2013. Retrieved 21 January 2014.
  161. "The Patents (European Patent with Unitary Effect and Unified Patent Court) Order 2016". Government of the United Kingdom. Retrieved 21 January 2016.
  162. "House of Commons Hansard Debates for 02 Mar 2016 (pt 0004)". publications.parliament.uk.
  164. "UK legislation to introduce the UPC system is finalised". www.bristowsupc.com.
  165. "UK Withdrawal from the UPCA | Unified Patent Court". www.unified-patent-court.org.
  166. "Pressemøde den 7. maj 2013". Government of Denmark (in Danish). 7 May 2013. Retrieved 11 May 2013.
  167. Stanners, Peter (27 September 2013). "Deal with eurosceptics could stave off EU patent referendum". The Copenhagen Post. Archived from the original on 26 November 2013. Retrieved 5 October 2013.
  168. Cremer, Justin (20 December 2013). "It's official: Danes to vote on EU patent court". The Copenhagen Post. Retrieved 20 December 2013.
  169. EU Information Centre of the Folketing: Folkeafstemning om den fælles patentdomstol (in Danish), March 2014. Accessed: 8 May 2014.
  170. Schulze, Christina; Klos, Mathieu (13 June 2017). "Patentwelt in Schockstarre: Unbekannter Kläger bremst UPC-Ratifizierung" [Patent world in a state of shock: Unknown plaintiff slows down the ratification of the UPC]. JUVE (in German). Retrieved 9 August 2017.
  171. Klos, Mathieu; Schulze, Christina (6 September 2017). "UPC: Düsseldorfer Rechtsanwalt Stjerna legte Verfassungsbeschwerde ein" [Düsseldorf-based attorney-at-law Stjerna lodged constitutional complaint]. JUVE (in German). Retrieved 10 September 2017.
  172. Bausch, Thorsten (16 August 2017). "UPC – Finally some News from the German Federal Constitutional Court". Kluwer Patent Blog. Retrieved 10 September 2017.
  173. Klos, Mathieu (18 August 2017). "Karlsruhe: Patentanwalt enthüllt Gründe für UPC-Verfassungsbeschwerde" [Karlsruhe: Patent attorney reveals grounds for UPC constitutional complaint]. Juve (in German). Retrieved 10 September 2017.
  174. "What we know about the status of the Unitary Patent and Unified Patent Court project in mid September 2017" (PDF). epi Information. European Patent Institute. September 2017. p. 6. Retrieved 1 October 2017.
  175. Klos, Mathieu; Griffiths, Aled (April 2018). "Lone Warrior". JUVE Patent. No. 4/18. JUVE GmbH. pp. 13–17.
  176. "Act of Approval to the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court is void". Bundesverfassungsgericht. 20 March 2020. Retrieved 23 March 2020.
  177. "New draft bill presented in Germany for ratification of the UPCA". 12 June 2020.
  178. Walters, Max (22 December 2020). "New UPC complaints filed in Germany". managingip.com. Managing IP. Retrieved 25 December 2020.
  179. Klos, Mathieu (22 December 2020). "Breaking: German UPC legislation challenged again by constitutional complaints". juve-patent.com. Juve Patent. Retrieved 25 December 2020.
  180. "Two new constitutional complaints in Germany against UPCA". kluweriplaw.com. Wolters Kluwer. 23 December 2020. Retrieved 25 December 2020.
  181. "German ratification of Unified Patent Court Agreement put on hold". Kluwer Patent Blog (patentblog.kluweriplaw.com). 13 January 2021. Retrieved 14 January 2021.
  182. "ACCORDING TO THE PROVISIONS IN FORCE OF THE FUNDAMENTAL LAW, THE AGREEMENT ON THE UNIFIED PATENT COURT CANNOT BE PUBLISHED IN HUNGARY". Constitution of Hungary. 9 July 2018. Retrieved 16 July 2018.
  183. Collins, Stephen (4 March 2013). "Three issues for autumn referendums". The Irish Times. Retrieved 5 March 2013.
  184. "Referendum on abolition of Seanad likely to take place in October". The Irish Times. 1 May 2013. Retrieved 9 September 2013.
  185. "Mainstream EP election debate: Innovation equates with economic recovery". EuroScientist. 22 May 2014. Retrieved 28 May 2014.
  186. "Dáil debates - Written answers Wednesday 7 May 2014: Unified Patent Court". KildareStreet. 7 May 2014.
  187. "GOVERNMENT LEGISLATION PROGRAMME: AUTUMN SESSION 2014" (PDF). Office of the Government Chief Whip. 17 September 2014.
  188. "No rush on Irish ratification for the UPC Agreement". Bristows. 8 June 2015.
  189. "35 308 (R2132) Overeenkomst betreffende een eengemaakt octrooigerecht; Brussel, 19 februari 2013 A/ Nr. 1 BRIEF VAN DE MINISTER VAN BUITENLANDSE ZAKEN" (PDF). Officiele Bekendmakingen (in Dutch). 9 September 2019. Retrieved 29 September 2019.
  190. "The Constitutional Reform and Governance Act 2010" (PDF). Part 2: Ratification of treaties. Gov.uk. 8 April 2010.
  191. "Agreement on a Unified Patent Court" (PDF). European Union. Official Documents (UK) (3). June 2013. Retrieved 1 February 2014. Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty
  192. "Intellectual Property Act 2014" (PDF). The Stationery Office. 14 May 2014.
  193. "Closed consultation: Secondary Legislation Implementing the Unified Patent Court". Gov.uk. 12 March 2015.
  194. "UK Intellectual Property Office confirms UK UPC commitment". Bristows. 26 June 2015.
  195. "Draft UK legislation implementing the UPC system laid before Parliament". Bristows LLP. 21 January 2016.
  196. "UK signs UPC Immunities and Privileges Protocol". www.bristowsupc.com.
  197. "The UK's path to ratifying the UPC Agreement". 13 December 2016.
  198. "No Unified Patent Court or Unitary Patent for Post-Brexit UK". JDSUPRA. 4 March 2020. Retrieved 15 May 2020.
  199. "Proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters". Europa.eu. 26 July 2013. Retrieved 29 July 2013.
  200. "2013/0268(COD) - Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters: Procedure completed, awaiting publication in Official Journal". European Parliament. 15 April 2014.
  201. "Procedure file: 2013/0268(COD) - Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters". European Parliament. 15 May 2014.
  202. "Spain v Council". Court of Justice of the European Union. Case C-274/11 (Joined Cases C-274/11, C-295/11).
  203. "Italy, Spain take patent fight to court", EurActiv.com, Published 31 May 2011 – Updated 7 June 2011.
  204. Palmer, Danny (16 April 2013). "Unified EU patent scheme moves a step closer". Retrieved 21 April 2013.
  205. "Action brought on 22 March 2013 - Kingdom of Spain v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (Case C-146/13)". InfoCuria. 22 March 2013.
  206. "Action brought on 22 March 2013 - Kingdom of Spain v Council of the European Union (Case C-147/13)". InfoCuria. 22 March 2013.
  207. "Patent Issues: Progress Towards European Unitary Patent - State of progress as of September 2013". RGC Jenkins & Co. September 2013.
  208. "Spain v Parliament and Council". Court of Justice of the European Union. Case C-146/13.
  209. "Spain v Council". Court of Justice of the European Union. Case C-147/13.
  210. "Spain launches fresh legal challenge to the European Unitary Patent". 27 March 2013. Retrieved 29 March 2013.
Wikisource has original text related to this article:
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.