Diethylstilbestrol

Diethylstilbestrol (DES), also known as stilbestrol or stilboestrol, is a nonsteroidal estrogen medication, which is presently rarely used.[5][6][7] In the past, it was widely used for a variety of indications, including pregnancy support for those with a history of recurrent miscarriage, hormone therapy for menopausal symptoms and estrogen deficiency, treatment of prostate cancer and breast cancer, and other uses.[5] By 2007, it was only used in the treatment of prostate cancer and breast cancer.[8] In 2011, Hoover and colleagues reported on adverse health outcomes linked to DES including infertility, miscarriage, ectopic pregnancy, preeclampsia, preterm birth, stillbirth, infant death, menopause prior to age 45, breast cancer, cervical cancer, and vaginal cancer.[9] While most commonly taken by mouth, DES was available for use by other routes as well, for instance, vaginal, topical, and by injection.

Diethylstilbestrol
Clinical data
Other namesDES; Stilboestrol; Stilbestrol; (E)-11,12-Diethyl-4,13-stilbenediol
AHFS/Drugs.comMicromedex Detailed Consumer Information
Pregnancy
category
  • X
Routes of
administration		By mouth, vaginal, topical, intravenous, intramuscular injection (as an ester)
Drug classNonsteroidal estrogen
ATC code
Pharmacokinetic data
BioavailabilityWell-absorbed[1]
Protein binding>95%[2]
MetabolismHydroxylation, oxidation, glucuronidation[1][2][3]
Metabolites• (Z,Z)-Dienestrol[1]
• Paroxypropione[1]
• Glucuronides[2][3]
Elimination half-life24 hours[1][4]
ExcretionUrine, feces[2][3]
Identifiers
IUPAC name
  • 4,4'-[(3E)-Hex-3-ene-3,4-diyl]diphenol
CAS Number
PubChem CID
IUPHAR/BPS
DrugBank
ChemSpider
UNII
KEGG
ChEBI
ChEMBL
CompTox Dashboard (EPA)
ECHA InfoCard100.000.253
Chemical and physical data
FormulaC18H20O2
Molar mass268.356 g·mol−1
3D model (JSmol)
  • Oc2ccc(/C(=C(/c1ccc(O)cc1)CC)CC)cc2
  • InChI=1S/C18H20O2/c1-3-17(13-5-9-15(19)10-6-13)18(4-2)14-7-11-16(20)12-8-14/h5-12,19-20H,3-4H2,1-2H3/b18-17+ Y
  • Key:RGLYKWWBQGJZGM-ISLYRVAYSA-N Y
  (verify)

DES is an estrogen, or an agonist of the estrogen receptors, the biological target of estrogens like estradiol.[7] It is a synthetic and nonsteroidal estrogen of the stilbestrol group, and differs from the natural estrogen estradiol in various ways.[7] Compared to estradiol, DES has greatly improved bioavailability when taken by mouth, is more resistant to metabolism, and shows relatively increased effects in certain parts of the body like the liver and uterus.[7] These differences result in DES having an increased risk of blood clots, cardiovascular issues, and certain other adverse effects.[7]

DES was discovered in 1938 and introduced for medical use in 1939.[10][11] From about 1940 to 1971, the medication was given to pregnant women in the incorrect belief that it would reduce the risk of pregnancy complications and losses.[10] In 1971, DES was shown to cause clear-cell carcinoma, a rare vaginal tumor, in those who had been exposed to this medication in utero.[10][5] The United States Food and Drug Administration subsequently withdrew approval of DES as a treatment for pregnant women.[10][5] Follow-up studies have indicated that DES also has the potential to cause a variety of significant adverse medical complications during the lifetimes of those exposed.[10][12]

The United States National Cancer Institute recommends[13] children born to mothers who took DES to undergo special medical exams on a regular basis to screen for complications as a result of the medication. Individuals who were exposed to DES during their mothers' pregnancies are commonly referred to as "DES daughters" and "DES sons".[10][14] Since the discovery of the toxic effects of DES, it has largely been discontinued and is now mostly no longer marketed.[10][15]

Medical uses

DES has been used in the past for the following indications:[5]

DES was used at a dosage of 0.2 to 0.5 mg/day in menopausal hormone therapy.[27][5]

Interest in the use of DES to treat prostate cancer continues today.[28][29][30][31][32][33][34] However, use of bioidentical parenteral estrogens like polyestradiol phosphate has been advocated in favor of oral synthetic estrogens like DES due to their much lower risk of cardiovascular toxicity.[35][32][34] In addition to prostate cancer, some interest in the use of DES to treat breast cancer continues today as well.[36][37] However, similarly to the case of prostate cancer, arguments have been made[38] for the use of bioidentical estrogens like estradiol instead of DES for breast cancer.[36][38]

Oral DES at 0.25 to 0.5 mg/day is effective in the treatment of hot flashes in men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer.[39]

Although DES was used to support pregnancy, it was later found not to be effective for this use.[40]

Side effects

At more than 1 mg/day, DES is associated with high rates of side effects including nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, headache, and bloating (incidence of 15–50%).[41]

Breast changes and feminization

The pigmentation of the breast areolae are often very dark and almost black with DES therapy.[5][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] The pigmentation that occurs with synthetic estrogens such as DES is much greater than with natural estrogens such as estradiol.[5][42] The mechanism of the difference is unknown.[5] Progestogens like hydroxyprogesterone caproate have been reported to reduce the nipple hyperpigmentation induced by high-dose estrogen therapy.[49]

In men treated with it for prostate cancer, DES has been found to produce high rates of gynecomastia (breast development) of 41 to 77%.[50]

Blood clots and cardiovascular issues

In studies of DES as a form of high-dose estrogen therapy for those with prostate cancer, it has been associated with considerable cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.[29][5] The risk is dose-dependent.[29] A dosage of 5 mg/day DES has been associated with a 36% increase in non-cancer-related (mostly cardiovascular) deaths.[29] In addition, there is an up to 15% incidence of venous thromboembolism.[51] A 3 mg/day dosage of DES has been associated with an incidence of thromboembolism of 9.6 to 17%, with an incidence of cardiovascular complications of 33.3%.[29] A lower dosage of 1 mg/day DES has been associated with a rate of death due to cardiovascular events of 14.8% (relative to 8.3% for orchiectomy alone).[29]

Other long-term effects

DES has been linked to a variety of long-term adverse effects, such as increased risk of

in women who were treated with it during pregnancy, and/or in their offspring.[52]

A comprehensive animal study in 1993 found a plethora of adverse effects from DES such as (but not limited to)

Rodent studies reveal female reproductive tract cancers and abnormalities reaching to the F2 generation, and there is evidence of adverse effects such as irregular menstrual cycles intersexual in grandchildren of DES mothers.[55] Additionally, evidence also points to transgenerational effects in F2 sons, such as hypospadias.[56] At this time however, the extent of DES transgenerational effects in humans is not fully understood.

Overdose

DES has been assessed in the past in clinical studies at extremely high doses of as much as 1,500 to 5,000 mg/day.[36][57][58]

Pharmacology

Estrogenic activity

DES is an estrogen; specifically, it is a highly potent full agonist of both of the estrogen receptors (ERs).[59][60] It has approximately 468% and 295% of the affinity of estradiol at the ERα and ERβ, respectively.[61] However, EC50 values of 0.18 nM and 0.06 nM of DES for the ERα and ERβ, respectively, have been reported, suggesting, in spite of its binding affinity for the two receptors, several-fold preference for activation of the ERβ over the ERα.[62] In addition to the nuclear ERs, DES is an agonist of the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER), albeit with relatively low affinity (~1,000 nM).[63] DES produces all of the same biological effects attributed to natural estrogens like estradiol.[64][65] This includes effects in the uterus, vagina, mammary glands, pituitary gland, and other tissues.[64][65][66][67]

A dosage of 1 mg/day DES is approximately equivalent to a dosage of 50 µg/day ethinylestradiol in terms of systemic estrogenic potency.[1][4] Similarly to ethinylestradiol, DES shows a marked and disproportionately strong effect on liver protein synthesis.[7] Whereas its systemic estrogenic potency was about 3.8-fold of that of estropipate (piperazine estrone sulfate), which has similar potency to micronized estradiol, the hepatic estrogenic potency of DES was 28-fold that of estropipate (or about 7.5-fold stronger potency for a dosage with equivalent systemic estrogenic effect).[1]

DES has at least three mechanisms of action in the treatment of prostate cancer.[68] It suppresses gonadal androgen production and hence circulating androgen levels due to its antigonadotropic effects; it stimulates hepatic sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) production, thereby increasing circulating levels of SHBG and decreasing the free fraction of testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) in the circulation; and it may have direct cytotoxic effects in the testes and prostate gland.[68] DES has also been found to decrease DNA synthesis at high doses.[68]

DES is a long-acting estrogen, with a nuclear retention of around 24 hours.[69][70]

Relative oral potencies of estrogens
EstrogenHFVEUCaFSHLHHDL-CSHBGCBGAGTLiver
Estradiol1.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.01.0
Estrone ? ? ?0.30.3 ? ? ? ? ?
Estriol0.30.30.10.30.30.2 ? ? ?0.67
Estrone sulfate ?0.90.90.8–0.90.90.50.90.5–0.71.4–1.50.56–1.7
Conjugated estrogens1.21.52.01.1–1.31.01.53.0–3.21.3–1.55.01.3–4.5
Equilin sulfate ? ?1.0 ? ?6.07.56.07.5 ?
Ethinylestradiol12015040060–150100400500–600500–6003502.9–5.0
Diethylstilbestrol ? ? ?2.9–3.4 ? ?26–2825–37205.7–7.5
Sources and footnotes
Notes: Values are ratios, with estradiol as standard (i.e., 1.0). Abbreviations: HF = Clinical relief of hot flashes. VE = Increased proliferation of vaginal epithelium. UCa = Decrease in UCa. FSH = Suppression of FSH levels. LH = Suppression of LH levels. HDL-C, SHBG, CBG, and AGT = Increase in the serum levels of these liver proteins. Liver = Ratio of liver estrogenic effects to general/systemic estrogenic effects (hot flashes/gonadotropins). Sources: See template.
Potencies of oral estrogens[data sources 1]
Compound Dosage for specific uses (mg usually)[lower-alpha 1]
ETD[lower-alpha 2] EPD[lower-alpha 2] MSD[lower-alpha 2] MSD[lower-alpha 3] OID[lower-alpha 3] TSD[lower-alpha 3]
Estradiol (non-micron.) 30≥120–3001206--
Estradiol (micronized) 6–1260–8014–421–2>5>8
Estradiol valerate 6–1260–8014–421–2->8
Estradiol benzoate -60–140----
Estriol ≥20120–150[lower-alpha 4]28–1261–6>5-
Estriol succinate -140–150[lower-alpha 4]28–1262–6--
Estrone sulfate 1260422--
Conjugated estrogens 5–1260–808.4–250.625–1.25>3.757.5
Ethinylestradiol 200 μg1–2280 μg20–40 μg100 μg100 μg
Mestranol 300 μg1.5–3.0300–600 μg25–30 μg>80 μg-
Quinestrol 300 μg2–4500 μg25–50 μg--
Methylestradiol -2----
Diethylstilbestrol 2.520–30110.5–2.0>53
DES dipropionate -15–30----
Dienestrol 530–40420.5–4.0--
Dienestrol diacetate 3–530–60----
Hexestrol -70–110----
Chlorotrianisene ->100-->48-
Methallenestril -400----
Sources and footnotes:
  1. [71][72][73][74][75][76] [77][78][79][80] [81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89]
  1. Dosages are given in milligrams unless otherwise noted.
  2. Dosed every 2 to 3 weeks
  3. Dosed daily
  4. In divided doses, 3x/day; irregular and atypical proliferation.
Parenteral potencies and durations of nonsteroidal estrogens
EstrogenFormMajor brand name(s)EPD (14 days)Duration
Diethylstilbestrol (DES)Oil solutionMetestrol20 mg1 mg ≈ 2–3 days; 3 mg ≈ 3 days
Diethylstilbestrol dipropionateOil solutionCyren B12.5–15 mg2.5 mg ≈ 5 days
Aqueous suspension ?5 mg ? mg = 21–28 days
Dimestrol (DES dimethyl ether)Oil solutionDepot-Cyren, Depot-Oestromon, Retalon Retard20–40 mg ?
Fosfestrol (DES diphosphate)aAqueous solutionHonvan ?<1 day
Dienestrol diacetateAqueous suspensionFarmacyrol-Kristallsuspension50 mg ?
Hexestrol dipropionateOil solutionHormoestrol, Retalon Oleosum25 mg ?
Hexestrol diphosphateaAqueous solutionCytostesin, Pharmestrin, Retalon Aquosum ?Very short
Note: All by intramuscular injection unless otherwise noted. Footnotes: a = By intravenous injection. Sources: See template.

Antigonadotropic effects
Testosterone levels with no treatment and with various estrogens in men with prostate cancer.[90] Determinations were made with an early radioimmunoassay (RIA).[90] Source was Shearer et al. (1973).[90]
Testosterone levels with placebo and 0.2 to 5 mg/day diethylstilbestrol (DES) for 6 months in men with prostate cancer.[91] Determinations were made with a radioimmunoassay (RIA).[91] Source was Kent et al. (1973).[91]

Due to its estrogenic activity, DES has antigonadotropic effects.[81][68][92][93] That is, it exerts negative feedback on the hypothalamic–pituitary–gonadal axis (HPG axis), suppresses the secretion of the gonadotropins, luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and suppresses sex hormone production as well as gamete production or maturation in the gonads.[81][68][92][93] A study of ovulation inhibition found that 5 mg/day oral DES was 92% effective, with ovulation occurring in only a single cycle.[94][88] DES consistently suppresses testosterone levels in men into the castrate range (<50 ng/dL) within 1 to 2 weeks at doses of 3 mg/day and above.[81][93][95] Conversely, a dosage of 1 mg/day DES is unable to fully suppress testosterone levels into the castrate range in men, which instead often stabilize at just above castrate levels (>50 ng/dL).[29][68][92] However, it has also been reported that 1 mg/day DES results in approximately 50% suppression of testosterone levels, albeit with wide interindividual variability.[81][96] It has been said that doses of DES of less than 1 mg/day have no effect on testosterone levels.[81] However, the addition of an "extremely low" dosage of 0.1 mg/day DES to cyproterone acetate has been found to result in a synergistic antigonadotropic effect and to suppress testosterone levels into the castrate range in men.[97][98][99] DES at 3 mg/day has similar testosterone suppression to a dose of 300 mg/day, suggesting that suppression of testosterone levels is maximal by 3 mg/day.[100]

Other activities

In addition to the ERs, an in vitro study found that DES also possesses activity, albeit relatively weak, at a variety of other steroid hormone receptors.[62] Whereas the study found EC50 values of 0.18 nM and 0.06 nM of DES for the ERα and ERβ, respectively, the medication showed significant glucocorticoid activity at a concentration of 1 μM that surpassed that of 0.1 nM dexamethasone, as well as significant antagonism of the androgen, progesterone, and mineralocorticoid receptors (75%, 85%, and 50% inhibition of positive control stimulation, respectively, all at a concentration of 1 μM).[62] It also showed approximately 25% inhibition of the activation of PPARγ and LXRα at a concentration of 10 μM.[62] The researchers stated that, to the best of their knowledge, they were the first to report such actions of DES, and hypothesized that these actions could be involved in the clinical effects of DES, for instance, in prostate cancer (notably in which particularly high dosages of DES are employed).[62] However, they also noted that the importance of the activities requires further study in animal models at pharmacologically relevant doses.[62]

DES has been identified as an antagonist of all three isotypes of the estrogen-related receptors (ERRs), the ERRα, ERRβ, and ERRγ.[101][102] Half-maximal inhibition occurs at a concentration of about 1 μM.[102]

Pharmacokinetics

DES is well-absorbed with oral administration.[1] With an oral dosage of 1 mg/day DES, plasma levels of DES at 20 hours following the last dose ranged between 0.9 and 1.9 ng/mL (3.4 to 7.1 nmol/L).[1] Sublingual administration of DES appears to have about the same estrogenic potency of oral DES in women.[103] Intrauterine DES has been studied for the treatment of uterine hypoplasia.[104] Oral DES is thought to have about 17 to 50% of the clinical estrogenic potency of DES by injection.[105]

The distribution half-life of DES is 80 minutes.[1] It has no affinity for SHBG or corticosteroid-binding globulin, and hence is not bound to these proteins in the circulation.[106] The plasma protein binding of DES is greater than 95%.[2]

Hydroxylation of the aromatic rings of DES and subsequent conjugation of the ethyl side chains accounts for 80 to 90% of DES metabolism, while oxidation accounts for the remaining 10 to 20% and is dominated by conjugation reactions.[2][3] Conjugation of DES consists of glucuronidation, while oxidation includes dehydrogenation into (Z,Z)-dienestrol.[1][2][3] The medication is also known to produce paroxypropione as a metabolite.[107] DES produces transient quinone-like reactive intermediates that cause cellular and genetic damage, which may help to explain the known carcinogenic effects of DES in humans.[1] However, other research indicates that the toxic effects of DES may simply be due to overactivation of the ERs.[108] In contrast to estradiol, the hydroxyl groups of DES do not undergo oxidation into an estrone-like equivalent.[109]

The elimination half-life of DES is 24 hours.[1] The metabolites of DES are excreted in urine and feces.[2][3]

Chemistry
Chemical structures of estradiol and DES.[110] Note the preservation of the two hydroxyl groups in DES and the similar distance between them relative to estradiol, which is notable when it is considered that DES was discovered serendipitously.[110][111][112]

DES belongs to the stilbestrol (4,4'-dihydroxystilbene) group of compounds.[113] It is a nonsteroidal open-ring analogue of the steroidal estrogen estradiol.[110] DES can be prepared from anethole, which also happens to be weakly estrogenic.[113][114][112][111] Anethole was demethylated to form anol and anol then spontaneously dimerized into dianol and hexestrol, with DES subsequently being synthesized via structural modification of hexestrol.[113][114][112][111] As shown by X-ray crystallography, the molecular dimensions of DES are almost identical to those of estradiol, particularly in regards to the distance between the terminal hydroxyl groups.[111]

History

Synthesis

DES was first synthesized in early 1938 by Leon Golberg, then a graduate student of Sir Robert Robinson at the Dyson Perrins Laboratory at the University of Oxford. Golberg's research was based on work by Wilfrid Lawson at the Courtauld Institute of Biochemistry, (led by Sir Edward Charles Dodds at Middlesex Hospital Medical School now part of University College London). A report of its synthesis was published in Nature on 5 February 1938.[115][116][117]

DES research was funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC), which had a policy against patenting drugs discovered using public funds. Because it was not patented, DES was produced by more than 200 pharmaceutical and chemical companies worldwide.

Clinical use

DES was first marketed for medical use in 1939.[11] It was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on September 19, 1941, in tablets up to 5 mg for four indications: gonorrheal vaginitis, atrophic vaginitis, menopausal symptoms, and postpartum lactation suppression to prevent breast engorgement.[117] The gonorrheal vaginitis indication was dropped when the antibiotic penicillin became available. From its very inception, the drug was highly controversial.[118][119]

In 1941, Charles Huggins and Clarence Hodges at the University of Chicago found estradiol benzoate and DES to be the first effective drugs for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer.[120][121] DES was the first cancer drug.[122]

Orchiectomy or DES or both were the standard initial treatment for symptomatic advanced prostate cancer for over 40 years, until the GnRH agonist leuprorelin was found to have efficacy similar to DES without estrogenic effects and was approved in 1985.[95]

From the 1940s until the late 1980s, DES was FDA-approved as estrogen replacement therapy for estrogen deficiency states such as ovarian dysgenesis, premature ovarian failure, and after oophorectomy.

In the 1940s, DES was used off-label to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with a history of miscarriage. On July 1, 1947, the FDA approved the use of DES for this indication. The first such approval was granted to Bristol-Myers Squibb, allowing use of 25 mg (and later 100 mg) tablets of DES during pregnancy. Approvals were granted to other pharmaceutical companies later in the same year.[123] The recommended regimen started at 5 mg per day in the seventh and eighth weeks of pregnancy (from first day of last menstrual period), increased every other week by 5 mg per day through the 14th week, and then increased every week by 5 mg per day from 25 mg per day in the 15th week to 125 mg per day in the 35th week of pregnancy.[124] DES was originally considered effective and safe for both the pregnant woman and the developing baby. It was aggressively marketed and routinely prescribed. Sales peaked in 1953.

In the early 1950s, a double-blind clinical trial at the University of Chicago assessed pregnancy outcomes in women who were assigned to either receive or not receive DES.[125] The study showed no benefit of taking DES during pregnancy; adverse pregnancy outcomes were not reduced in the women who were given DES. By the late 1960s, six of seven leading textbooks of obstetrics said DES was ineffective at preventing miscarriage.[123][126]

Despite an absence of evidence supporting the use of DES to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes, DES continued to be given to pregnant women through the 1960s. In 1971, a report published in the New England Journal of Medicine showed a probable link between DES and vaginal clear cell adenocarcinoma in girls and young women who had been exposed to this drug in utero. Later in the same year, the FDA sent an FDA Drug Bulletin to all U.S. physicians advising against the use of DES in pregnant women. The FDA also removed prevention of miscarriage as an indication for DES use and added pregnancy as a contraindication for DES use.[127] On February 5, 1975, the FDA ordered 25 mg and 100 mg tablets of DES withdrawn, effective February 18, 1975.[128] The number of persons exposed to DES during pregnancy or in utero during the period of 1940 to 1971 is unknown, but may be as high as 2 million in the United States. DES was also used in other countries, most notably France, the Netherlands, and Great Britain.

From the 1950s through the beginning of the 1970s, DES was prescribed to prepubescent girls to begin puberty and thus stop growth by closing growth plates in the bones. Despite its clear link to cancer, doctors continued to recommend the hormone for "excess height".[129]

In 1960, DES was found to be more effective than androgens in the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women.[130] DES was the hormonal treatment of choice for advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women until 1977, when the FDA approved tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator with efficacy similar to DES but fewer side effects.[131]

Several sources from medical literature in the 1970s and 1980s indicate that DES was used as a component of hormone therapy for transgender women.[132][133][134]

In 1973, in an attempt to restrict off-label use of DES as a postcoital contraceptive (which had become prevalent at many university health services following publication of an influential study in 1971 in JAMA) to emergency situations such as rape, an FDA Drug Bulletin was sent to all U.S. physicians and pharmacists that said the FDA had approved, under restricted conditions, postcoital contraceptive use of DES.[135]

In 1975, the FDA said it had not actually given (and never did give) approval to any manufacturer to market DES as a postcoital contraceptive, but would approve that indication for emergency situations such as rape or incest if a manufacturer provided patient labeling and special packaging as set out in a FDA final rule published in 1975.[136] To discourage off-label use of DES as a postcoital contraceptive, the FDA in 1975 removed DES 25 mg tablets from the market and ordered the labeling of lower doses (5 mg and lower) of DES still approved for other indications changed to state: "This drug product should not be used as a postcoital contraceptive" in block capital letters on the first line of the physician prescribing information package insert and in a prominent and conspicuous location of the container and carton label.[128][137] In the 1980s, off-label use of the Yuzpe regimen of certain regular combined oral contraceptive pills superseded off-label use of DES as a postcoital contraceptive.[138]

In 1978, the FDA removed postpartum lactation suppression to prevent breast engorgement from their approved indications for DES and other estrogens.[139] In the 1990s, the only approved indications for DES were treatment of advanced prostate cancer and treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. The last remaining U.S. manufacturer of DES, Eli Lilly, stopped making and marketing it in 1997.

Trials

Diethylstilbestrol has been used countless times in studies on rats. Once it was discovered that DES was causing vaginal cancer, experiments began on both male and female rats.[140] Many of these male rats were injected with DES while other male rats were injected with olive oil, and they were considered the control group.[140] Each group received the same dosage on the same days, and the researchers performed light microscopy, electron microscopy, and confocal laser microscopy. With both the electron and confocal laser microscopy, it was prevalent that the Sertoli cells, which is a somatic cell where spermatids develop in the testes, was formed thirty-six years later in the rats who were injected with Diethylstilbestrol compared to the rats in the control group.[140] Proceeding the completion of the trial, it was understood that rats of older age who were injected with DES experienced delay in sertoli cell maturation, underdeveloped epididymides, and drastic decrease in weight compared to its counterparts.[140]

The female rats used were inbred and most of them were given DES combined in their food. These rats were divided into three groups, one group who received no diethylstilbestrol, one group who had DES mixed into their diet, and the third group who had DES administered into their diet after day 13 of being pregnant.[141] Some rats who were given DES unfortunately died before delivering their pup.[141] The group that received DES in their food for 13 days while being pregnant resulted in early abortion and delivery failure.[141] These outcomes showed that DES had a detrimental effect on pregnancy when administered as often as it was. Providing the dosing of diethylstilbestrol later in the pregnancy term also made visible the occurrence of abortions among the rats.[141] Overall, any interaction with DES in female rats concluded in the rats' experiencing abortions, improper fetal growth, and the increase in sterility.[141]

A review of people who had been treated or exposed to DES was done to find out how long-term effects would show.[142] People for a long time had been treated during their pregnancy with DES and there have been known to be toxic and adverse effects to the hormone therapy. "Exposure to DES has been associated with an increased risk for breast cancer in DES mothers (relative risk, <2.0) and with a lifetime risk of clear-cell cervicovaginal cancer in DES daughters of 1/1000 to 1/10 000."[142] Side effects of DES are proving to be long-term as it can cause increased risks to cancer after use.[142] There will be continued work to see how far the adverse effects of DES will go after previous therapy as many women had used this during pregnancy and there is a long line to see how it will effect offspring and the mothers longer-term.[142]

Regulations

In 1938, the ability to test the safety of DES on animals was first obtained by the FDA. The results from the preliminary tests showed that DES harmed the reproductive systems of animals. The application of these results to humans could not be determined, so the FDA could not act in a regulatory manner.[143]

New Drug Applications for DES approval were withdrawn in 1940 in a decision made by the FDA based on scientific uncertainty. However, this decision resulted in significant political pressure, so the FDA came to a compromise. The compromise meant that DES would be available only by prescription and would have to have warnings about its effects on the bottle, but the warning was dropped in 1945. In 1947, DES finally gained FDA approval for prescription to pregnant women who had diabetes as a method of preventing miscarriages. This led to the widespread prescription of DES to all pregnant women.[143]

In 1971, the FDA recommended against the prescription of DES to pregnant women.[144] As a result, DES then began to see a withdraw from the US market starting in 1972 and in the European market starting in 1978, but the FDA still did not withdraw its approval for the use of DES in humans.[145]

DES was classified as a Group 1 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer. After classification as a carcinogen, DES had its FDA approval withdrawn in 2000.[144] DES is currently only in use for veterinary practices and in research trials as allowed by the FDA.[146]

Medical Ethics

Medical Ethics in regard to the approval and use of Diethylstilbestrol have been dismissed because of the actions of the FDA and pharmaceutical companies that were making DES at the time of its use. The Vice President of the American Drug Manufacturers Association, Carson Frailey, was employed by drug companies creating DES in order to help get it approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Nancy Langston, the author of The Retreat from Precaution: Regulating Diethylstilbestrol (DES), Endocrine Disruptors, and Environmental Health, states that "Frailey persuaded fifty-four doctors from around the country to write to the FDA, describing their clinical experiences with a total of more than five thousand patients. Only four of these fifty-four doctors felt that DES should not be approved, and the result was that, against the concerns of many of the FDA medical staff, the FDA's drug chief Theodore Klumpp recommended that the FDA approve DES."[147] This excerpt describes how DES was unethically approved and shows that the motivation behind its approval was for the benefit of drug companies rather than the people who were going to use the drug. This approval of DES violates the values of medical ethics, autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice as there was little thought put into how DES would affect its users.[148] The decisions made by the FDA leaders to approve DES without further study and convince doctors to dissimulate their opinions on the use of DES is unethical. Once DES was approved for public consumption the "warnings [for DES were] made available only on a separate circular that patients would not see. Doctors could get this warning circular only by writing to the drug companies and requesting it. Letters between companies and FDA regulators reveal that both groups feared that if a woman ever saw how many potential risks DES might present, she might refuse to take the drug—or else she might sue the company and the prescribing doctors if she did get cancer or liver damage after taking the drug."[147] Women were not informed about the possible effects of DES because doctors and FDA regulators were afraid DES would fail and never be approved costing the drug companies millions of dollars. The act of distributing potentially dangerous medicine to patients regardless of the affect and harm it may do solely for monetary gain is unethical.

Lawsuits

In the 1970s, the negative publicity surrounding the discovery of DES's long-term effects resulted in a huge wave of lawsuits in the United States against its manufacturers. These culminated in a landmark 1980 decision of the Supreme Court of California, Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories, in which the court imposed a rebuttable presumption of market share liability upon all DES manufacturers, proportional to their share of the market at the time the drug was consumed by the mother of a particular plaintiff.

Eli Lilly, a pharmaceutical company manufacturing DES, and the University of Chicago, had an action filed against them in regard to clinical trials from the 1950s. Three women filed the claim that their daughters had developments of abnormal cervical cellular formations as well as reproductive abnormalities in themselves and their sons.[149] The plaintiffs had asked the courts to certify their case as a class action but were declined by the courts. However, the courts issued an opinion that their case had merit. The court held that Eli Lilly had a duty to notify about the risks of DES once they became aware of them or should have become aware of them.[149] Under Illinois tort law, for the plaintiffs to recover under theories of breach of duty to warn and strict liability, the plaintiffs must have alleged injury to themselves. Ultimately, under their claims of breach of duty to warn and strict liability due to the plaintiffs citing risk of physical injury to others, not physical injury to themselves, the case was dismissed by the courts.[149] Although the case was not certified as class action and their claims of breach of duty to warn and strict liability was dismissed, the courts did not dismiss the battery allegations.[149] The issue was then to determine whether the University of Chicago had committed battery against these women but the case was settled before trial.[149] Part of the settlement agreement for this case, Mink v. University of Chicago, attorneys for the plaintiffs negotiated for the university to provide free medical exams for all offspring exposed to DES in utero during the 1950 experiments as well as treat the daughters of any women involved who develop DES-associated vaginal or cervical cancer.[149]

As of February 1991, there were over a thousand pending legal actions against DES manufacturers.[149] There are over 300 companies that manufactured DES according to the same formula and the largest barrier to recovery is determining which manufacturer supplied the drug in each particular case.[149] Many of the successful cases have relied on joint or several parties holding liability.

A lawsuit was filed in Boston Federal Court by 53 DES daughters who say their breast cancers were the result of DES being prescribed to their mothers while pregnant with them. Their cases survived a Daubert hearing. In 2013, the Fecho sisters who initiated the breast cancer/DES link litigation agreed to an undisclosed settlement amount on the second day of trial. The remaining litigants have received various settlements.[150]

The advocacy group DES Action USA helped provide information and support for DES-exposed persons engaged in lawsuits.[151]

Society and culture

Alan Turing, the ground-breaking cryptographer, founder of computing science and programmable computers, who also proposed the actual theoretical model of biological morphogenesis, was forced onto this medication to induce chemical castration as a punitive and discredited "treatment" for homosexual behaviour, shortly before he died in ambiguous circumstances.[152]

James Herriot describes a case regarding treating a small dog's testicular Sertoli cell tumor in his 1974 book All Things Bright and Beautiful. Herriot decided to prescribe a high dose of the new drug Stilboestrol for the recurring tumor, with the amusing side effect that the male dog became "attractive to other male dogs", who followed the terrier around the village for a few weeks. Herriot comments in the story that he knew "The new drug was said to have a feminising effect, but surely not to that extent."

Veterinary use

Canine incontinence

DES has been very successful in treating female canine incontinence stemming from poor sphincter control. It is still available from compounding pharmacies, and at the low (1 mg) dose, does not have the carcinogenic properties that were so problematic in humans.[153] It is generally administered once a day for seven to ten days and then once every week as needed.

Livestock growth promotion

The greatest usage of DES was in the livestock industry, used to improve feed conversion in beef and poultry. During the 1960s, DES was used as a growth hormone in the beef and poultry industries. It was later found to cause cancer by 1971, but was not phased out until 1979.[154][155] Although DES was discovered to be harmful to humans, its veterinary use was not immediately halted. As of 2011, DES was still being used as a growth promoter in terrestrial livestock or fish in some parts of the world including China.[156]

References
  1. Chabner B, Longo DL (1996). Cancer Chemotherapy and Biotherapy: Principles and Practice. Lippincott-Raven Publishers. p. 186. ISBN 978-0-397-51418-2. Piperazine estrone sulfate and micronized estradiol were equipotent with respect to increases in SHBG, whereas [...] DES was 28.4-fold more potent [...]. With respect to decreased FSH, [...] DES was 3.8-fold, and ethinyl estradiol was 80 to 200-fold more potent than was piperazine estrone sulfate. The dose equivalents for ethinyl estradiol (50 µg) and DES (1 mg) reflect these relative potencies.220 [...] DES, a potent synthetic estrogen (Fig. 6-12), is absorbed well after an oral dosage. Patients given 1 mg of DES daily had plasma concentrations at 20 hours ranging from 0.9 to 1.9 ng per mL. The initial half-life of DES is 80 minutes, with a secondary half-life of 24 hours.223 The principal pathways of metabolism are conversion to the glucuronide and oxidation. The oxidative pathways include aromatic hydroxylation of the ethyl side chains and dehydrogenation to (Z,Z)-dienestrol, producing transient quinone-like intermediates that react with cellular macromolecules and cause genetic damage in eukaryotic cells.223 Metabolic activation of DES may explain its well-established carcinogenic properties.224
  2. Oelschläger H, Rothley D, Dunzendorfer U (1988). "New Results on the Pharmacokinetics of Fosfestrol". Urologia Internationalis. 43 (1): 15–23. doi:10.1159/000281427. ISSN 1423-0399.
  3. Droz JP, Kattan J, Bonnay M, Chraibi Y, Bekradda M, Culine S (February 1993). "High-dose continuous-infusion fosfestrol in hormone-resistant prostate cancer". Cancer. 71 (3 Suppl): 1123–30. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19930201)71:3+<1123::AID-CNCR2820711434>3.0.CO;2-T. PMID 8428334. S2CID 23078614.
  4. Abramson FP, Miller HC (December 1982). "Bioavailability, distribution and pharmacokinetics of diethystilbestrol produced from stilphostrol". J Urol. 128 (6): 1336–9. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)53502-8. PMID 7154205.
  5. Noller KL, Fish CR (July 1974). "Diethylstilbestrol usage: Its interesting past, important present, and questionable future". Med. Clin. North Am. 58 (4): 793–810. doi:10.1016/S0025-7125(16)32122-8. PMID 4276416.
  6. Elks J (14 November 2014). The Dictionary of Drugs: Chemical Data: Chemical Data, Structures and Bibliographies. Springer. pp. 396–. ISBN 978-1-4757-2085-3.
  7. Kuhl H (August 2005). "Pharmacology of estrogens and progestogens: influence of different routes of administration" (PDF). Climacteric. 8 (Suppl 1): 3–63. doi:10.1080/13697130500148875. PMID 16112947. S2CID 24616324.
  8. Watkins ES (16 April 2007). The Estrogen Elixir: A History of Hormone Replacement Therapy in America. JHU Press. pp. 26–. ISBN 978-0-8018-8602-7.
  9. "Effects of Diethylstilbestrol (DES), a Trans-placental Carcinogen". dceg.cancer.gov. 20 November 2012. Retrieved 3 September 2020.
  10. Veurink M, Koster M, Berg LT (June 2005). "The history of DES, lessons to be learned". Pharm World Sci. 27 (3): 139–43. doi:10.1007/s11096-005-3663-z. PMID 16096877. S2CID 12630813.
  11. Feldberg GD, Ladd-Taylor M, Li A (2003). Women, Health and Nation: Canada and the United States Since 1945. McGill-Queen's Press - MQUP. pp. 103–. ISBN 978-0-7735-2501-6.
  12. "DES Update: For Consumers". United States Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Retrieved 2011-06-30.
  13. "Diethylstilbestrol (DES) and Cancer". National Cancer Institute. Retrieved 2011-06-30.
  14. Arnold A (January 5, 2017). "The Devastating Effects of a 1940s 'Wonder Pill' Haunt Women Generations Later". Broadly.
  15. Coelingh Bennink HJ (April 2004). "Are all estrogens the same?". Maturitas. 47 (4): 269–275. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2003.11.009. PMID 15063479.
  16. Vorherr H (2 December 2012). The Breast: Morphology, Physiology, and Lactation. Elsevier Science. pp. 201–203. ISBN 978-0-323-15726-1.
  17. Chatz, T.L. (June 1972). "Recognizing and Treating Dangerous Sex Offenders". International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. 16 (2): 109–115. doi:10.1177/0306624X7201600202. eISSN 1552-6933. ISSN 0306-624X. S2CID 74365268.
  18. Thompson IM (2001). "Flare Associated with LHRH-Agonist Therapy". Rev Urol. 3 (Suppl 3): S10–4. PMC 1476081. PMID 16986003.
  19. Scaletscky R, Smith JA (April 1993). "Disease flare with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogues. How serious is it?". Drug Saf. 8 (4): 265–70. doi:10.2165/00002018-199308040-00001. PMID 8481213. S2CID 36964191.
  20. Kreis W, Ahmann FR, Jordan VC, de Haan H, Scott M (October 1988). "Oestrogen pre-treatment abolishes luteinising hormone-releasing hormone testosterone stimulation". Br J Urol. 62 (4): 352–4. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.1988.tb04364.x. PMID 2973364.
  21. Stein BS, Smith JA (April 1985). "DES lead-in to use of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone analogs in treatment of metastatic carcinoma of prostate". Urology. 25 (4): 350–3. doi:10.1016/0090-4295(85)90484-4. PMID 3920802.
  22. Fernandez del Moral P, Litjens TT, Weil EH, Debruyne FM (August 1988). "Can combined DES and LHRH depot therapy (ICI 118630) prevent endocrinologic and clinical flare-up in metastatic prostate cancer?". Urology. 32 (2): 137–40. doi:10.1016/0090-4295(88)90316-0. PMID 2969641.
  23. Bruchovsky N, Goldenberg SL, Akakura K, Rennie PS (September 1993). "Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists in prostate cancer. Elimination of flare reaction by pretreatment with cyproterone acetate and low-dose diethylstilbestrol". Cancer. 72 (5): 1685–91. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19930901)72:5<1685::AID-CNCR2820720532>3.0.CO;2-3. PMID 7688656. S2CID 21824595.
  24. Kotake T, Usami M, Akaza H, Koiso K, Homma Y, Kawabe K, Aso Y, Orikasa S, Shimazaki J, Isaka S, Yoshida O, Hirao Y, Okajima E, Naito S, Kumazawa J, Kanetake H, Saito Y, Ohi Y, Ohashi Y (November 1999). "Goserelin acetate with or without antiandrogen or estrogen in the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial in Japan. Zoladex Study Group". Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 29 (11): 562–70. doi:10.1093/jjco/29.11.562. PMID 10678560.
  25. Hamburger C (1969). "Endocrine treatment of male and female transsexualism". In Money J, Green R (eds.). Transsexualism and Sex Reassignment. Johns Hopkins Press. pp. 291–307. ISBN 9780801810381. OCLC 6866559.
  26. Ober WB (1976). "Stilbestrol: a pathologist's view". Pathol Annu. 11: 227–54. PMID 794803.
  27. Buchsbaum HJ (6 December 2012). The Menopause. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 60–. ISBN 978-1-4612-5525-3.
  28. Reis LO, Zani EL, García-Perdomo HA (June 2018). "Estrogen therapy in patients with prostate cancer: a contemporary systematic review". Int Urol Nephrol. 50 (6): 993–1003. doi:10.1007/s11255-018-1854-5. PMID 29600433. S2CID 4403709.
  29. Turo R, Smolski M, Esler R, Kujawa ML, Bromage SJ, Oakley N, Adeyoju A, Brown SC, Brough R, Sinclair A, Collins GN (February 2014). "Diethylstilboestrol for the treatment of prostate cancer: past, present and future". Scand J Urol. 48 (1): 4–14. doi:10.3109/21681805.2013.861508. PMID 24256023. S2CID 34563641.
  30. Bosset PO, Albiges L, Seisen T, de la Motte Rouge T, Phé V, Bitker MO, Rouprêt M (December 2012). "Current role of diethylstilbestrol in the management of advanced prostate cancer". BJU Int. 110 (11 Pt C): E826–9. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11206.x. PMID 22578092. S2CID 21407416.
  31. Scherr DS, Pitts WR (November 2003). "The nonsteroidal effects of diethylstilbestrol: the rationale for androgen deprivation therapy without estrogen deprivation in the treatment of prostate cancer". J. Urol. 170 (5): 1703–8. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000077558.48257.3d. PMID 14532759.
  32. Oh WK (September 2002). "The evolving role of estrogen therapy in prostate cancer". Clin Prostate Cancer. 1 (2): 81–9. doi:10.3816/cgc.2002.n.009. PMID 15046698.
  33. Malkowicz SB (August 2001). "The role of diethylstilbestrol in the treatment of prostate cancer". Urology. 58 (2 Suppl 1): 108–13. doi:10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01252-3. PMID 11502463.
  34. Cox RL, Crawford ED (December 1995). "Estrogens in the treatment of prostate cancer". J. Urol. 154 (6): 1991–8. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66670-9. PMID 7500443.
  35. Lycette JL, Bland LB, Garzotto M, Beer TM (December 2006). "Parenteral estrogens for prostate cancer: can a new route of administration overcome old toxicities?". Clin Genitourin Cancer. 5 (3): 198–205. doi:10.3816/CGC.2006.n.037. PMID 17239273.
  36. Coelingh Bennink HJ, Verhoeven C, Dutman AE, Thijssen J (January 2017). "The use of high-dose estrogens for the treatment of breast cancer". Maturitas. 95: 11–23. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2016.10.010. PMID 27889048.
  37. Marselos M, Tomatis L (1992). "Diethylstilboestrol: I, Pharmacology, Toxicology and carcinogenicity in humans". Eur. J. Cancer. 28A (6–7): 1182–9. doi:10.1016/0959-8049(92)90482-h. PMID 1627392.
  38. Ellis MJ, Dehdahti F, Kommareddy A, Jamalabadi-Majidi S, Crowder R, Jeffe DB, et al. (2014). "A randomized phase 2 trial of low dose (6 mg daily) versus high dose (30 mg daily) estradiol for patients with estrogen receptor positive aromatase inhibitor resistant advanced breast cancer". Cancer Research. 69 (2 Supplement): 16. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.SABCS-16. ISSN 0008-5472.
  39. Moorthy HK, Laxman Prabhu GG, Venugopal P (2019). "The resurgence of estrogens in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer". Indian J Urol. 35 (3): 189–196. doi:10.4103/iju.IJU_56_19. PMC 6639989. PMID 31367069.
  40. Langston, Lucy (2016). "Better Safe Than Sorry: Risk, Stigma, and Research During Pregnancy". Research Ethics Forum. Vol. 3. Springer International Publishing. pp. 33–50. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-26512-4_3. eISSN 2212-9537. ISBN 978-3-319-26510-0. ISSN 2212-9529.
  41. Swyer GI (April 1959). "The oestrogens". Br Med J. 1 (5128): 1029–31. doi:10.1136/bmj.1.5128.1029. PMC 1993181. PMID 13638626. [Diethylstilbestrol] suffers from the serious drawback that in doses above 1 mg. a day it is likely to produce nausea, vomiting, abdominal discomfort, headache, and bloating in a proportion of patients varyingly estimated from 15 to 50%.
  42. Dell Castillo EB, Argonz J (April 1954). "Oestrogen treatment in cases of rudimentary ovary syndrome". Acta Endocrinologica. 15 (4): 299–312. doi:10.1530/acta.0.0150299. PMID 13157878.
  43. Labhart A (6 December 2012). Clinical Endocrinology: Theory and Practice. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 720–. ISBN 978-3-642-96158-8.
  44. Davis ME, Boynton MW (1941). "Indications, clinical use and toxicity of 4-4' dihydroxy diethyl stilbene". The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 1 (4): 339–345. doi:10.1210/jcem-1-4-339. ISSN 0021-972X.
  45. Davis ME, Boynton MW, Ferguson JH, Rothman S (1945). "Studies on Pigmentation of Endocrine Origin". The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 5 (3): 138–146. doi:10.1210/jcem-5-3-138. ISSN 0021-972X.
  46. Lewis RM (December 1939). "The Clinical Use of Stilbestrol, A Synthetic Estrogen: Preliminary Report". The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine. 12 (2): 235–8. PMC 2602231. PMID 21433876.
  47. Lisser H, Curtis LE (October 1947). "The syndrome of congenitally aplastic ovaries with sexual infantilism, high urinary gonadotropins, short stature and other congenital abnormalities; tabular presentation of 25 previously unpublished cases". The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 7 (10): 665–87. doi:10.1210/jcem-7-10-665. PMID 20270944.
  48. Hamblen EC (1943). "Endocrine therapy in gynecology and obstetrics". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 45 (1): 147–160. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(43)90672-6. ISSN 0002-9378.
  49. Crowley LG, Macdonald I (April 1965). "Delalutin and estrogens for the treatment of advanced mammary carcinoma in the postmenopausal woman". Cancer. 18 (4): 436–46. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(196504)18:4<436::aid-cncr2820180407>3.0.co;2-d. PMID 14278040.
  50. Di Lorenzo G, Autorino R, Perdonà S, De Placido S (December 2005). "Management of gynaecomastia in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review". Lancet Oncol. 6 (12): 972–9. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70464-2. PMID 16321765.
  51. Phillips I, Shah SI, Duong T, Abel P, Langley RE (2014). "Androgen Deprivation Therapy and the Re-emergence of Parenteral Estrogen in Prostate Cancer". Oncol Hematol Rev. 10 (1): 42–47. doi:10.17925/ohr.2014.10.1.42. PMC 4052190. PMID 24932461.
  52. Bamigboye AA, Morris J (2003). "Oestrogen supplementation, mainly diethylstilbestrol, for preventing miscarriages and other adverse pregnancy outcomes". Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 (3): CD004353. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004353. PMC 9039959. PMID 12918007.
  53. Marselos M, Tomatis L (1993). "Diethylstilboestrol: II, pharmacology, toxicology and carcinogenicity in experimental animals". European Journal of Cancer. 29A (1): 149–155. doi:10.1016/0959-8049(93)90597-9. PMID 1445734.
  54. Kioumourtzoglou MA, Coull BA, O'Reilly ÉJ, Ascherio A, Weisskopf MG (July 2018). "Association of Exposure to Diethylstilbestrol During Pregnancy With Multigenerational Neurodevelopmental Deficits". JAMA Pediatrics. 172 (7): 670–677. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.0727. PMC 6137513. PMID 29799929.
  55. Titus-Ernstoff L, Troisi R, Hatch EE, Wise LA, Palmer J, Hyer M, et al. (August 2006). "Menstrual and reproductive characteristics of women whose mothers were exposed in utero to diethylstilbestrol (DES)". International Journal of Epidemiology. 35 (4): 862–868. doi:10.1093/ije/dyl106. PMID 16723367.
  56. Kalfa N, Paris F, Soyer-Gobillard MO, Daures JP, Sultan C (June 2011). "Prevalence of hypospadias in grandsons of women exposed to diethylstilbestrol during pregnancy: a multigenerational national cohort study". Fertility and Sterility. 95 (8): 2574–2577. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.02.047. PMID 21458804.
  57. Carter AC, Sedransk N, Kelley RM, Ansfield FJ, Ravdin RG, Talley RW, Potter NR (May 1977). "Diethylstilbestrol: recommended dosages for different categories of breast cancer patients. Report of the Cooperative Breast Cancer Group". JAMA. 237 (19): 2079–8. doi:10.1001/jama.1977.03270460065023. PMID 576887.
  58. Karnaky KJ (December 1952). "Micronized stilbestrol for dysfunctional uterine bleeding and endometriosis". South. Med. J. 45 (12): 1166–72. doi:10.1097/00007611-195212000-00009. PMID 13005120.
  59. Jordan VC (2013). Estrogen Action, Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators, and Women's Health: Progress and Promise. World Scientific. pp. 143–. ISBN 978-1-84816-958-6.
  60. Seiler JP, Autrup JL, Autrup H (6 December 2012). Diversification in Toxicology — Man and Environment: Proceedings of the 1997 EUROTOX Congress Meeting Held in Århus, Denmark, June 25–28, 1997. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 23–. ISBN 978-3-642-46856-8.
  61. Kuiper GG, Carlsson B, Grandien K, Enmark E, Häggblad J, Nilsson S, Gustafsson JA (March 1997). "Comparison of the ligand binding specificity and transcript tissue distribution of estrogen receptors alpha and beta". Endocrinology. 138 (3): 863–870. doi:10.1210/endo.138.3.4979. PMID 9048584.
  62. Coss CC, Jones A, Parke DN, Narayanan R, Barrett CM, Kearbey JD, Veverka KA, Miller DD, Morton RA, Steiner MS, Dalton JT (March 2012). "Preclinical characterization of a novel diphenyl benzamide selective ERα agonist for hormone therapy in prostate cancer". Endocrinology. 153 (3): 1070–81. doi:10.1210/en.2011-1608. PMID 22294742.
  63. Prossnitz ER, Arterburn JB (July 2015). "International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. XCVII. G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor and Its Pharmacologic Modulators". Pharmacological Reviews. 67 (3): 505–540. doi:10.1124/pr.114.009712. PMC 4485017. PMID 26023144.
  64. Lackner JE, Tulsky AS (1941). "Effect of stilbestrol on the myometrial and endometrial activity of the human castrate uterus". The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 1 (5): 415–418. doi:10.1210/jcem-1-5-415. ISSN 0021-972X. [Diethylstilbestrol], differing distinctly in chemical structure from the previously known estrogens, has been shown to produce all the biologic effects attributed to them, such as suppression of the antuitary (2), inhibition of body growth (2), proliferation of the ductile system of the breast (3), suppression of engorgement incident to lactation (4), hyperemia, edema, and distention of the uterus (5), proliferation of the endometrium (6), vaginal cornification (7), and swelling of the sexual skin (8). It likewise presumably has the supposed carcinogenic propensities of the true estrogens (9).
  65. Jacobsen E, Christensen SS (1939). "Comparison of the effects of stilboestrol and oestrone on the mammary tissue of castrated female rats". Acta Pathologica et Microbiologica Scandinavica. 16 (4): 359–364. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0463.1939.tb06045.x. ISSN 0365-5555. After it was shown by Dodds, Goldberg, Lawson, and Robinson that stilboestrol (4.4' dioxy-α-β-diethylstilbene had the same effects as the natural oestrones on the vaginal mucosa of castrated female rats, a great number of works have appeared, which show that this substance, despite its very great chemical difference from the natural female sexual hormones has practically the same effect as these in all respects. The most important of these investigations have been made by Dodds, Lawson and Noble, by Noble, by Bishop, Boycott and Zuckermann, by Erik Guldberg, by Engelhardt, by Winterton and MacGregor, by Erik Jacobsen and most recently by Kreitmair and Sickman, by Buschbeck and Hausknecht, by Cobet, Ratschow and Stechner. The previous experiments have been made on hens, mice, rats, guineapigs, rabbits, monkeys, and human subjects.
  66. Lewis AA, Turner CW (1941). "Effect of Stilbestrol on the Mammary Gland of the Mouse, Rat, Rabbit, and Goat". Journal of Dairy Science. 24 (10): 845–860. doi:10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(41)95467-X. ISSN 0022-0302.
  67. Lewis AA, Turner CW (1942). "Effect of Diethylstilbestrol on Mammary Gland Development in Dairy Animals1". Endocrinology. 31 (5): 520–528. doi:10.1210/endo-31-5-520. ISSN 0013-7227.
  68. Denis LJ, Griffiths E, Kaisary AV, Murphy GP (1 March 1999). Textbook of Prostate Cancer: Pathology, Diagnosis and Treatment: Pathology, Diagnosis and Treatment. CRC Press. pp. 294, 297–. ISBN 978-1-85317-422-3.
  69. Runnebaum B, Rabe T (17 April 2013). Gynäkologische Endokrinologie und Fortpflanzungsmedizin: Band 1: Gynäkologische Endokrinologie. Springer-Verlag. pp. 88–. ISBN 978-3-662-07635-4.
  70. Hammond CB, Maxson WS (January 1982). "Current status of estrogen therapy for the menopause". Fertility and Sterility. 37 (1): 5–25. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(16)45970-4. PMID 6277697.
  71. Lauritzen C (September 1990). "Clinical use of oestrogens and progestogens". Maturitas. 12 (3): 199–214. doi:10.1016/0378-5122(90)90004-P. PMID 2215269.
  72. Lauritzen C (June 1977). "[Estrogen thearpy in practice. 3. Estrogen preparations and combination preparations]" [Estrogen therapy in practice. 3. Estrogen preparations and combination preparations]. Fortschritte Der Medizin (in German). 95 (21): 1388–92. PMID 559617.
  73. Wolf AS, Schneider HP (12 March 2013). Östrogene in Diagnostik und Therapie. Springer-Verlag. pp. 78–. ISBN 978-3-642-75101-1.
  74. Göretzlehner G, Lauritzen C, Römer T, Rossmanith W (1 January 2012). Praktische Hormontherapie in der Gynäkologie. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 44–. ISBN 978-3-11-024568-4.
  75. Knörr K, Beller FK, Lauritzen C (17 April 2013). Lehrbuch der Gynäkologie. Springer-Verlag. pp. 212–213. ISBN 978-3-662-00942-0.
  76. Horský J, Presl J (1981). "Hormonal Treatment of Disorders of the Menstrual Cycle". In Horsky J, Presl J (eds.). Ovarian Function and its Disorders: Diagnosis and Therapy. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 309–332. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-8195-9_11. ISBN 978-94-009-8195-9.
  77. Pschyrembel W (1968). Praktische Gynäkologie: für Studierende und Ärzte. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 598–599. ISBN 978-3-11-150424-7.
  78. Lauritzen CH (January 1976). "The female climacteric syndrome: significance, problems, treatment". Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica. Supplement. 51: 47–61. doi:10.3109/00016347509156433. PMID 779393.
  79. Lauritzen C (1975). "The Female Climacteric Syndrome: Significance, Problems, Treatment". Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 54 (s51): 48–61. doi:10.3109/00016347509156433. ISSN 0001-6349.
  80. Kopera H (1991). "Hormone der Gonaden". Hormonelle Therapie für die Frau. Kliniktaschenbücher. pp. 59–124. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-95670-6_6. ISBN 978-3-540-54554-5. ISSN 0172-777X.
  81. Scott WW, Menon M, Walsh PC (April 1980). "Hormonal Therapy of Prostatic Cancer". Cancer. 45 Suppl 7: 1929–1936. doi:10.1002/cncr.1980.45.s7.1929. PMID 29603164.
  82. Leinung MC, Feustel PJ, Joseph J (2018). "Hormonal Treatment of Transgender Women with Oral Estradiol". Transgender Health. 3 (1): 74–81. doi:10.1089/trgh.2017.0035. PMC 5944393. PMID 29756046.
  83. Ryden AB (1950). "Natural and synthetic oestrogenic substances; their relative effectiveness when administered orally". Acta Endocrinologica. 4 (2): 121–39. doi:10.1530/acta.0.0040121. PMID 15432047.
  84. Ryden AB (1951). "The effectiveness of natural and synthetic oestrogenic substances in women". Acta Endocrinologica. 8 (2): 175–91. doi:10.1530/acta.0.0080175. PMID 14902290.
  85. Kottmeier HL (1947). "Ueber blutungen in der menopause: Speziell der klinischen bedeutung eines endometriums mit zeichen hormonaler beeinflussung: Part I". Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 27 (s6): 1–121. doi:10.3109/00016344709154486. ISSN 0001-6349. There is no doubt that the conversion of the endometrium with injections of both synthetic and native estrogenic hormone preparations succeeds, but the opinion whether native, orally administered preparations can produce a proliferation mucosa changes with different authors. PEDERSEN-BJERGAARD (1939) was able to show that 90% of the folliculin taken up in the blood of the vena portae is inactivated in the liver. Neither KAUFMANN (1933, 1935), RAUSCHER (1939, 1942) nor HERRNBERGER (1941) succeeded in bringing a castration endometrium into proliferation using large doses of orally administered preparations of estrone or estradiol. Other results are reported by NEUSTAEDTER (1939), LAUTERWEIN (1940) and FERIN (1941); they succeeded in converting an atrophic castration endometrium into an unambiguous proliferation mucosa with 120–300 oestradiol or with 380 oestrone.
  86. Rietbrock N, Staib AH, Loew D (11 March 2013). Klinische Pharmakologie: Arzneitherapie. Springer-Verlag. pp. 426–. ISBN 978-3-642-57636-2.
  87. Martinez-Manautou J, Rudel HW (1966). "Antiovulatory Activity of Several Synthetic and Natural Estrogens". In Robert Benjamin Greenblatt (ed.). Ovulation: Stimulation, Suppression, and Detection. Lippincott. pp. 243–253.
  88. Herr F, Revesz C, Manson AJ, Jewell JB (1970). "Biological Properties of Estrogen Sulfates". Chemical and Biological Aspects of Steroid Conjugation. pp. 368–408. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-49793-3_8. ISBN 978-3-642-49506-9.
  89. Duncan CJ, Kistner RW, Mansell H (October 1956). "Suppression of ovulation by trip-anisyl chloroethylene (TACE)". Obstetrics and Gynecology. 8 (4): 399–407. PMID 13370006.
  90. Shearer RJ, Hendry WF, Sommerville IF, Fergusson JD (December 1973). "Plasma testosterone: an accurate monitor of hormone treatment in prostatic cancer". Br J Urol. 45 (6): 668–77. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410x.1973.tb12238.x. PMID 4359746.
  91. Kent JR, Bischoff AJ, Arduino LJ, Mellinger GT, Byar DP, Hill M, Kozbur X (May 1973). "Estrogen dosage and suppression of testosterone levels in patients with prostatic carcinoma". J. Urol. 109 (5): 858–60. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)60564-0. PMID 4699685.
  92. Salam MA (2003). Principles & Practice of Urology: A Comprehensive Text. Universal-Publishers. pp. 684–. ISBN 978-1-58112-412-5.
  93. Lam JS, Leppert JT, Vemulapalli SN, Shvarts O, Belldegrun AS (January 2006). "Secondary hormonal therapy for advanced prostate cancer". J. Urol. 175 (1): 27–34. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00034-0. PMID 16406864.
  94. Martinez-Manautou J, Rudel HW (1966). "Antiovulatory Activity of Several Synthetic and Natural Estrogens". In Robert Benjamin Greenblatt (ed.). Ovulation: Stimulation, Suppression, and Detection. Lippincott. pp. 243–253. ISBN 9780397590100.
  95. The Leuprolide Study Group (November 1984). "Leuprolide versus diethylstilbestrol for metastatic prostate cancer". N Engl J Med. 311 (20): 1281–6. doi:10.1056/NEJM198411153112004. PMID 6436700.
  96. Seftel AD, Spirnak JP, Resnick MI (1989). "Hormonal therapy for advanced prostatic carcinoma". J Surg Oncol. 42 (Suppl 1): 14–20. doi:10.1002/jso.2930420505. PMID 2669792. S2CID 44250508.
  97. Schröder FH, Radlmaier A (2009). "Steroidal Antiandrogens". Hormone Therapy in Breast and Prostate Cancer. pp. 325–346. doi:10.1007/978-1-59259-152-7_15. ISBN 978-1-60761-471-5.
  98. Goldenberg SL, Bruchovsky N, Rennie PS, Coppin CM (December 1988). "The combination of cyproterone acetate and low dose diethylstilbestrol in the treatment of advanced prostatic carcinoma". J. Urol. 140 (6): 1460–5. doi:10.1016/S0022-5347(17)42073-8. PMID 2973529.
  99. Goldenberg SL, Bruchovsky N, Gleave ME, Sullivan LD (June 1996). "Low-dose cyproterone acetate plus mini-dose diethylstilbestrol--a protocol for reversible medical castration". Urology. 47 (6): 882–4. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00048-9. PMID 8677581.
  100. Robinson MR, Thomas BS (November 1971). "Effect of hormonal therapy on plasma testosterone levels in prostatic carcinoma". Br Med J. 4 (5784): 391–4. doi:10.1136/bmj.4.5784.391. PMC 1799485. PMID 5124437.
  101. Greschik H, Flaig R, Renaud JP, Moras D (August 2004). "Structural basis for the deactivation of the estrogen-related receptor gamma by diethylstilbestrol or 4-hydroxytamoxifen and determinants of selectivity". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 279 (32): 33639–46. doi:10.1074/jbc.M402195200. PMID 15161930.
  102. Ariazi EA, Jordan VC (2006). "Estrogen-related receptors as emerging targets in cancer and metabolic disorders". Curr Top Med Chem. 6 (3): 203–15. doi:10.2174/1568026610606030203. PMID 16515477.
  103. Rabinowitz JL, Myerson RM (1967). Topics in Medicinal Chemistry. Wiley-Interscience. p. 16. ISBN 978-0-471-70468-3.
  104. Friedberg V (October 1951). "Die Behandlung der genitalen Hypoplasie mit intrauterinen Cyren-B-Kristallsuspensionen" [Intrauterine Cyren-B Crystal Suspensions in Therapy of Genital Hypoplasia]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd (in German). 11 (10): 923–30. ISSN 0016-5751. PMID 14926876.
  105. Bishop PM (2008). "The Difficulty of Evaluating the Potency of Steroid Hormones by Different Routes of Administration in Humans". Ciba Foundation Symposium - Steroid Hormone Administration (Book II of Colloquia on Endocrinology, Vol. 3). Novartis Foundation Symposia. pp. 349–355. doi:10.1002/9780470715154.ch10. ISBN 9780470715154. ISSN 1935-4657.
  106. Pugeat MM, Dunn JF, Nisula BC (July 1981). "Transport of steroid hormones: interaction of 70 drugs with testosterone-binding globulin and corticosteroid-binding globulin in human plasma". The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 53 (1): 69–75. doi:10.1210/jcem-53-1-69. PMID 7195405.
  107. Chambers PL, Günzel P (12 March 2013). Mechanism of Toxic Action on Some Target Organs: Drugs and Other Substances. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 276–. ISBN 978-3-642-67265-1.
  108. Couse JF, Korach KS (December 2004). "Estrogen receptor-alpha mediates the detrimental effects of neonatal diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure in the murine reproductive tract". Toxicology. 205 (1–2): 55–63. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2004.06.046. PMID 15458790.
  109. Jensen EV, Jacobson HI, Walf AA, Frye CA (February 2010). "Estrogen action: a historic perspective on the implications of considering alternative approaches". Physiol. Behav. 99 (2): 151–62. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2009.08.013. PMC 2834267. PMID 19737574.
  110. Wermuth CG, Aldous D, Raboisson P, Rognan D (1 July 2015). The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry. Elsevier Science. pp. 244–245. ISBN 978-0-12-417213-5.
  111. Sneader W (31 October 2005). Drug Discovery: A History. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 196–197. ISBN 978-0-470-01552-0.
  112. Ravina (11 January 2011). T he Evolution of Drug Discovery: From Traditional Medicines to Modern Drugs. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 177–. ISBN 978-3-527-32669-3.
  113. Vitamins and Hormones. Academic Press. 1945. pp. 233–. ISBN 978-0-08-086600-0.
  114. Maximov PY, McDaniel RE, Jordan VC (23 July 2013). Tamoxifen: Pioneering Medicine in Breast Cancer. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 3–. ISBN 978-3-0348-0664-0.
  115. Dodds EC, Goldberg L, Lawson W, Robinson R (1938). "Estrogenic activity of certain synthetic compounds". Nature. 141 (3562): 247–8. doi:10.1038/141247b0. S2CID 4078256.
  116. Dodds EC (1957). Biochemical contributions to endocrinology; experiments in hormonal research. Stanford: Stanford University Press. OCLC 1483899.
  117. Meyers R (1983). D.E.S., the bitter pill. New York: Seaview/Putnam. ISBN 0-399-31008-8.
  118. Langston N (2010). Toxic bodies: Hormone disruptors and the legacy of DES. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0-300-13607-4.
  119. Seaman B (2003). The greatest experiment ever performed on women: Exploding the estrogen myth. New York: Hyperion. ISBN 978-0-7868-6853-7.
  120. Huggins C, Hodges CV (1972). "Studies on prostatic cancer. I. The effect of castration, of estrogen and androgen injection on serum phosphatases in metastatic carcinoma of the prostate". CA. 22 (4): 232–40. doi:10.3322/canjclin.22.4.232. PMID 4625049. S2CID 19786742.
  121. "Prostate cancer yields to a drug". The New York Times: 29. 15 December 1943.
  122. Lupulescu A (24 October 1990). Hormones and Vitamins in Cancer Treatment. CRC Press. pp. 36–. ISBN 978-0-8493-5973-6.
  123. Dutton DB (1988). Worse than the disease: pitfalls of medical progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-34023-3.
  124. Physicians' desk reference to pharmaceutical specialties and biologicals (15th ed.). Oradell NJ: Medical Economics. 1961. p. 625. ISBN 0-00-093447-X.
  125. Dieckmann WJ, Davis ME, Rynkiewicz LM, Pottinger RE (November 1953). "Does the administration of diethylstilbestrol during pregnancy have therapeutic value?". American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 66 (5): 1062–81. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(16)38617-3. PMID 13104505.
  126. Apfel RJ, Fisher SM (1984). To do no harm: DES and the dilemmas of modern medicine. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-03192-0.
  127. United States Food and Drug Administration (1971). "Certain estrogens for oral or parenteral use. Drugs for human use; drug efficacy study implementation". Fed Regist. 36 (217): 21537–8.; 36 FR 21537
  128. FDA (1975). "Certain estrogens for oral use. Notice of withdrawal of approval of new drug applications". Fed Regist. 40 (25): 5384.; 25 FR 5384
  129. Zuger A (2009-07-27). "At What Height, Happiness? A Medical Tale". The New York Times.
  130. Council on Drugs (1960). "Androgens and estrogens in the treatment of disseminated mammary carcinoma: retrospective study of nine hundred forty-four patients". JAMA. 172 (12): 1271–83. doi:10.1001/jama.1960.03020120049010.
  131. Ingle JN, Ahmann DL, Green SJ, Edmonson JH, Bisel HF, Kvols LK, Nichols WC, Creagan ET, Hahn RG, Rubin J, Frytak S (January 1981). "Randomized clinical trial of diethylstilbestrol versus tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer". The New England Journal of Medicine. 304 (1): 16–21. doi:10.1056/NEJM198101013040104. PMID 7001242.
  132. Goodwin WE, Cummings RH (March 1984). "Squamous metaplasia of the verumontanum with obstruction due to hypertrophy: long-term effects of estrogen on the prostate in an aging male-to-female transsexual". The Journal of Urology. 131 (3): 553–4. doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(17)50493-0. PMID 6199525.
  133. Lehrman KL (February 1976). "Pulmonary embolism in a transsexual man taking diethylstilbestrol". JAMA. 235 (5): 532–3. doi:10.1001/jama.1976.03260310046024. PMID 946104.
  134. Seyler LE, Canalis E, Spare S, Reichlin S (July 1978). "Abnormal gonadotropin secretory responses to LRH in transsexual women after diethylstilbestrol priming". The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 47 (1): 176–83. doi:10.1210/jcem-47-1-176. PMID 122396.
  135. Kuchera LK (October 1971). "Postcoital contraception with diethylstilbestrol". JAMA. 218 (4): 562–3. doi:10.1001/jama.218.4.562. PMID 5171004.
  136. FDA (1975). "Diethylstilbestrol as posticoital oral contraceptive; patient labeling". Fed Regist. 40 (25): 5451–5.; 40 FR 5451
  137. FDA (1975). "Estrogens for oral or parenteral use. Drugs for human use; drug efficacy study; amended notice". Fed Regist. 40 (39): 8242.; 39 FR 8242
  138. Hatcher RA, Stewart GK, Stewart F, Guest F, Josephs N, Dale J (1982). Contraceptive Technology 1982–1983. New York: Irvington Publishers. pp. 152–7. ISBN 0-8290-0705-9.
  139. FDA (1978). "Estrogens for postpartum breast engorgement". Fed Regist. 43 (206): 49564–7.; 43 FR 49564
  140. Toyama Y, Ohkawa M, Oku R, Maekawa M, Yuasa S (May 2001). "Neonatally administered diethylstilbestrol retards the development of the blood-testis barrier in the rat". Journal of Andrology. 22 (3): 413–423. PMID 11330641.
  141. Kawaguchi H, Miyoshi N, Miyamoto Y, Souda M, Umekita Y, Yasuda N, Yoshida H (October 2009). "Effects of exposure period and dose of diethylstilbestrol on pregnancy in rats". The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. 71 (10): 1309–1315. doi:10.1292/jvms.001309. PMID 19887736.
  142. Giusti RM, Iwamoto K, Hatch EE (May 1995). "Diethylstilbestrol revisited: a review of the long-term health effects". Annals of Internal Medicine. 122 (10): 778–788. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-122-10-199505150-00008. PMID 7717601. S2CID 25131834.
  143. Langston N (2008). "The Retreat from Precaution: Regulating Diethylstilbestrol (Des), Endocrine Disruptors, and Environmental Health". Environmental History. 13 (1): 41–65. doi:10.1093/envhis/13.1.41. ISSN 1084-5453. JSTOR 25473193.
  144. Zamora-León P (September 2021). "Are the Effects of DES Over? A Tragic Lesson from the Past". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18 (19): 10309. doi:10.3390/ijerph181910309. PMC 8507770. PMID 34639609.
  145. Eve L, Fervers B, Le Romancer M, Etienne-Selloum N (November 2020). "Exposure to Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Risk of Breast Cancer". International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 21 (23): 9139. doi:10.3390/ijms21239139. PMC 7731339. PMID 33266302.
  146. Carey JL, Nader N, Chai PR, Carreiro S, Griswold MK, Boyle KL (January 2017). "Drugs and Medical Devices: Adverse Events and the Impact on Women's Health". Clinical Therapeutics. 39 (1): 10–22. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2016.12.009. PMC 5779632. PMID 28069260.
  147. Langston N (January 2008). "The retreat from precaution: Regulating diethylstilbestrol (DES), endocrine disruptors, and environmental health". Environmental History. 13 (1): 41–65. doi:10.1093/envhis/13.1.41.
  148. Beauchamp TL (2018). "The principles of biomedical ethics as universal principles.". Islamic Perspectives on the Principles of Biomedical Ethics: Muslim Religious Scholars and Biomedical Scientists in Face-to-Face Dialogue with Western Bioethicists. Intercultural Dialogue in Bioethics. Vol. 1. pp. 91–119. doi:10.1142/9781786340481_0004. ISBN 978-1-78634-047-4.
  149. Mastroianni AC, Faden R, Federman D (March 1994). "Women and health research: a report from the Institute of Medicine". Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 4 (1): 55–62. doi:10.1353/ken.0.0121. PMID 10132589. S2CID 31494934.
  150. Lavoie D (9 January 2013). "DES Pregnancy Drug Lawsuit: Settlement Reached Between Melnick Sisters And Eli Lilly And Co". Huffington Post. Archived from the original on 10 January 2013. Retrieved 19 March 2014.
  151. "Collection: DES Action USA records | Smith College Finding Aids". Retrieved 2020-06-09.
  152. West-Taylor Z (24 September 2016). "The Alan Turing Law – a Formal Pardon for Unpardonable Homophobia". Affinity magazine. Retrieved 3 December 2016.
  153. "Urinary Incontinence". Merck Veterinary Manual. Merck Veterinary Manual. Retrieved 30 November 2012.
  154. Harris RM, Waring RH (June 2012). "Diethylstilboestrol--a long-term legacy". Maturitas. 72 (2): 108–12. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.03.002. PMID 22464649.
  155. Gandhi R, Snedeker S (2000-06-01). "Consumer Concerns About Hormones in Food" (PDF). Fact Sheet #37, June 2000. Program on Breast Cancer and Environmental Risk Factors, Cornell University. Archived from the original on 2011-07-19. Retrieved 2011-07-20.
  156. Liu, WJ, et al. (2018). "Removal and Biodegradation of 17β-Estradiol and Diethylstilbestrol by the Freshwater Microalgae Raphidocelis subcapitata". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 15 (3): 452. doi:10.3390/ijerph15030452. PMC 5876997. PMID 29510598. S2CID 4711788.

Further reading
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.