Dryptosaurus

Elements of the type specimen

Prior to the discovery of Dryptosaurus in 1866, theropods from the Americas were only known from isolated teeth discovered in Montana by Joseph Leidy in 1856.[1] The discovery of this genus gave North American paleontologists the opportunity to observe an articulated, albeit incomplete, theropod skeleton. During the late 19th century, this genus unfortunately became a wastebasket taxon for the referral of isolated theropod elements from across North America, given that Tyrannosauroidea was not recognized as a distinct group of large theropods at the time and numerous theropod species were assigned to it (often as Lælaps or Laelaps), only to be later reclassified.

The genus name Dryptosaurus means "tearing lizard", and is derived from the Greek words "dryptō" (δρύπτω), meaning "to tear", and "sauros" (σαυρος), meaning "lizard".[2] The specific name aquilunguis is derived from the Latin term for "having claws like an eagle's", which is a reference to the large claws on its hands. E. D. Cope (1866) published a paper on the specimen within a week of its discovery and named it Laelaps aquilunguis at a meeting of the Academy of Natural Sciences in Philadelphia.[3] "Laelaps", which is derived from the Greek word "hurricane" or "storm wind", was also the name of a dog in Greek mythology who never failed to catch what it was hunting.[4] Laelaps gained popularity as both a poetic and evocative name and became one of the first dinosaurs described from North America, following Hadrosaurus and Trachodon. Later, it was discovered that the name Laelaps had already been given to a genus of mite and Cope's lifelong rival O.C. Marsh changed the name in 1877 to Dryptosaurus. The type species is Dryptosaurus aquilunguis.

An outdated historical depiction of Dryptosaurus (center) confronting Elasmosaurus, with two Hadrosaurus in the background. By Edward Drinker Cope, 1869

Brusatte et al. (2011) noted that well-preserved, historic casts of most of the type material from ANSP 9995 and AMNH FARB 2438 are housed in the collections of the Natural History Museum in London (NHM OR50100). The casts show some detail that is no longer preserved on the original specimens, which have significantly degraded due to pyrite disease.[5]

Estimated size, compared to human

Dryptosaurus is estimated to have been 7.5 metres (25 ft) long and 1.5 metric tons (1.7 short tons), although this is based on partial remains of one individual.[11] Like its relative Eotyrannus, Dryptosaurus seems to have had relatively long arms when compared with more derived tyrannosaurs, such as Tyrannosaurus. Its hands, which are also relatively large, were once believed to have had three fingers. Brusatte et al. (2011), however, observed an overall similarity in the shape of the available phalanges of Dryptosaurus with those of derived tyrannosaurids and noted that Dryptosaurus may have had only two functional digits.[3] Each of its fingers were tipped with an eight-inch long, talon-like claw.[12] Its arm morphology suggests that arm reduction in tyrannosauroids may not have proceeded in a uniform fashion.[3] Dryptosaurus may have used both its arms and its jaws and as weapons when hunting, capturing, and its processing prey.[3]

The type specimen is a fragmentary skeleton belonging to a single adult individual, ANSP 9995. ANSP 9995 consists of a fragmentary right maxilla, a fragmentary right dentary, a fragmentary right surangular, lateral teeth, 11 middle-distal caudal vertebrae, both the left and right humeri, three manual phalanges from the left hand (I-1, II-2, and an ungual), the shafts of the left and right pubic bones, a fragmentary right ischium, the left femur, the left tibia, the left fibula, the left astragalus, and a midshaft fragment of metatarsal III. The ontological maturity of the holotype individual is supported by the fact that the neurocentral sutures are closed in all of its caudal vertebrae.[3] AMNH FARB 2438 consists of left metatarsal IV, which are likely from the same individual as the holotype.[13]

Life restoration

The fragmentary right maxilla preserves the three alveoli in full and the fourth only partially. The authors were able to ascertain that Dryptosaurus had ziphodont dentition. The shape of the alveolus situated on the anterior portion of the fragment suggests that it housed a tooth that was smaller and more circular than the others. This incisiform tooth is common among tyrannosauroids. The disarticulated teeth recovered are transversely narrow, serrated (17–18 denticles/cm), and recurved. The femur is only 3% longer than the tibia. The longest manual ungual phalanx recovered measured 176 mm (6.9 in) in length. The morphology of the proximal portion of metatarsal IV suggests that Dryptosaurus had an arctometatarsalian foot, an advanced feature shared by derived tyrannosauroids, such as Albertosaurus and Tyrannosaurus, in which the third metatarsal is "pinched" between the second and fourth metatarsals.[3]

According to Brusatte et al. (2011), Dryptosaurus can be distinguished based on the following characteristics: the combination of a reduced humerus (humerus: femur ratio = 0.375) and a large hand (phalanx I-1:femur ratio = 0.200), the strong mediolateral expansion of the ischial tubercle, which is approximately 1.7 times as wide as the shaft immediately distally, the presence of an ovoid fossa on the medial surface of the femoral shaft immediately proximal to the medial condyle (which is demarcated anteriorly by the mesiodistal crest and demarcated medially by a novel crest) the presence of a proximomedially trending ridge on the anterior surface of the fibula immediately proximal to the iliofibularis tubercle, the lip on the lateral surface of the lateral condyle of the astragalus being prominent and overlapping the proximal surface of the calcaneum, and metatarsal IV being observed with a flat shaft proximally (resulting in a semiovoid cross section that is much wider mediolaterally than it is long anteroposteriorly).[3]

Holotype claw bone

Since the time of its discovery, Dryptosaurus has been classified in a number of different theropod families. Cope (1866), Leidy (1868), and Lydekker (1888) noted obvious similarities with the genus Megalosaurus, which was known at the time from remains discovered in southeastern England. Based on this line of reasoning, Cope classified it as a megalosaurid. Marsh, however, examined the remains and later assigned to its own monotypic family, Dryptosauridae. The fossil material assigned to Dryptosaurus was reviewed by Ken Carpenter in 1997, in light of the many different theropods discovered since Cope's time. He felt that due to some unusual features it couldn't be placed in any existing family and, like Marsh, he felt that it warranted placement in Dryptosauridae.[13] This phylogenetic assignment was also supported by the work of Russell (1970) and Molnar (1990).[14][15] Other phylogenetic studies during the 1990s suggested that Dryptosaurus was a coelurosaur, though its exact placement within that group remained uncertain.

In 1946, Charles W. Gilmore was the first to observe that certain anatomical features may link Dryptosaurus with coeval Late Cretaceous tyrannosaurids, Albertosaurus, and Tyrannosaurus.[16] This observation was also supported by the work of Baird and Horner (1979), but did not have wide acceptance until a new discovery was made in 2005.[17] Dryptosaurus was the only large carnivore known in eastern North America until the discovery of the basal tyrannosauroid Appalachiosaurus in 2005.[18] Appalachiosaurus, which is known from more complete remains, is similar to Dryptosaurus in both body size and morphology.[19] This discovery made it clear that Dryptosaurus was also a basal tyrannosauroid. Detailed phylogenetic analysis by Brusatte et al. (2013) confirmed the tyrannosauroid affinities of Dryptosaurus and assigned it as an "intermediate" tyrannosauroid that is more derived than basal taxa, such as Guanlong and Dilong, but more primitive than members of the more derived Tyrannosauridae.[20]

Postcranial elements

Limb and other bones

The following cladogram containing almost all tyrannosauroids is by Loewen et al. (2013).[21]

Brown (2021) found Dryptosaurus to be the sister taxon to "Cryptotyrannus", an informally named theropod from the Merchantville Formation of Delaware.[22] Brownstein (2021) also reinstated the family Dryptosauridae, which now includes both "Cryptotyrannus" and Dryptosaurus.

Diagram showing known remains in of Dryptosaurus in brown

The type specimen of Dryptosaurus is ANSP 9995 and was recovered in the West Jersey Marl Company Pit, in what came to be known as the Hornerstown Formation in Barnsboro, Mantua Township, in Gloucester County, New Jersey. The specimen was collected by quarry workers in marl and sandstone that were deposited during the late Maastrichtian stage of the Late Cretaceous period, approximately 67 million years ago.[12][23]

The southern New Jersey Hornerstown Formation is also known as the New Egypt Formation in central New Jersey. Studies suggest that the New Egypt Formation is a marine unit and it is considered to be the deeper-water equivalent of the Tinton and Red Bank formations.[24] This formation overlies the Navesink Formation, from which potential Dryptosaurus referred material has been reported.

During the Maastrichtian stage, the Western Interior Seaway, which stretched in a north–south direction from the present-day Arctic Ocean down to the Gulf of Mexico, separated Dryptosaurus and its coeval fauna from western North America, which was dominated by the much larger tyrannosaurids. Although certainly a carnivore, the paucity of known Cretaceous East Coast dinosaurs make ascertaining the specific diet of Dryptosaurus very difficult.[12] Hadrosaurids are known from the same time and place as Dryptosaurus, the island continent of Appalachia, and they may have been a prominent part of its diet. Nodosaurs were also present, although they were less likely to be hunted due to their armor plating.[12] When hunting, both the skull and hands were important for the capture and processing of prey.

Leaping Laelaps by Charles R. Knight, 1897

The 1897 watercolor painting by Charles R. Knight titled Leaping Laelaps may represent the earliest depiction of theropods as highly active and dynamic animals. Knight's artistic hand was guided by E. D. Cope and reflects their progressive opinion about theropod agility, despite their large size, as well as the opinion of Henry Fairfield Osborn, the curator of vertebrate paleontology at the American Museum of Natural History at the time of the painting's commission. The original painting is now preserved in the AMNH collections. By contrast, the typical illustrations of large carnivorous dinosaurs like Megalosaurus, in the late 19th century, depicted the animals as large, slow, tail-dragging behemoths.

• Timeline of tyrannosaur research

• Carr & Williamson (2002). "Evolution of basal Tyrannosauroidea from North America". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 22 (3): 41A.
• - Cretaceous Dinosaurs of the Southeastern United States by David T. King Jr.

• [http://njfossils.net/meateating.html Dryptosaurus aquilunguis