Kannauji language

In borrowing something from other language is taken directly into a language. It is a very common and very productive process of word formation.

On the lexical and semantic basis we can divide borrowing in two types:

In lexical borrowing a word is directly taken into a language from other language. Lexical borrowing is very common in Kannauji.

Sometimes a word is not borrowed as it is. Some phonetic changes are made to it to match the properties of target language. The word is localised for ease of native speakers. For example:

In semantic borrowing some concept from another language is taken into a language, but the words used to express that concept are made in the target language. In this type of borrowing concepts/words are localised. For example:

Coining is a less frequent and a less productive word formation process. In coining meaning of a word is extended up to an extent that it starts being used as a category. Here are some examples of coining.

• chyawanpra:sh was a product made by Dabur. After that, many other companies launched their similar products. The name of chyawanpra:sh became so popular that now every such product is known as chyawanpra:sh.
• pachmo:la: When Vaidyanaath launched its digestive tablets it named them pachmo:la:. This product became so popular that afterwards all such products are known as pachmo:la:.

In Kannauji new words are formed by inflection old words, too. According to different properties this process is divided into two main types:

In inflection a new word is formed from an old word by adding something in it. It is the most common process of word formation in Kannauji. This process is category specific. The grammatical category of a word remains same even after inflection.

For example:

-ini

ladka + '-ini' = ladkini

(boy) (girl)

Here '–ini' is used to make a feminine form of the word ladka. Here is another example of inflection:

sangi + '-ini' = sangini (mate- male) (mate- female)

In derivation, too, new words are formed by old words using affixes. This is a very common process like inflection. There are three types of affixation found in Kannauji.

In this type of affixation an affix is inserted initially in a word.

• ‘ap-’

'ap-' + jash → apjash

(evil) (fame)

• ‘par-’

'par-' + dosh → pardo:sh

(others) (defects)

‘ap’ and ‘par’ are prefixes here. New words are being formed by adding them to two old words ‘jash’ and ‘dosh’.

In this type of affixation an affix is inserted at the end of a word; this way a new word is formed.

• ‘-aevo’

dikha:na: + -aevo → dikhaevo

(showing)

rakhna: + -aevo → rakhaevo

(keeping)

• ‘-pan’

apna + -pan → apno:pan

(self)

In this type of affixation an affix inserted somewhere in the middle of the word.

• ‘-la-’

dikh aevo: + -la- → dikhlaevo:

(showing)(making something show by some other person)

• ‘-va-’

hasa evo: + -va- → hasavaevo:

(to make laugh)(causing people laugh by some other person)

Blending is the process in which parts of two words (which are already present in that language) are joined to make a new word.

choti: + bit͜ti: →chotit͜ti:

(small) (girl)

badi: + bit͜ti: →badit͜ti:

(big) (girl)

bade: + dad͜da: →badid͜da:

(big) (brother)

In compounding two words are stringed together to form a new word. This process is a common word formation process. This type of formation process is used more by educated persons.

For example:

guru + ghantal = gurughantal

Here gurughantal is made by stringing guru and ghantal and the meaning referred by the stringed word is reflected by the words. Although it is not necessary in every condition. For example:

am͜ma aur dad͜da → am͜ma: dad͜da:

Conversion is a very productive but less frequent process of word formation. In this process a word starts being used as another word (having some similar properties).

In this process a word of some grammatical category starts being using as word of other grammatical category, too. Here are some examples of conversion.

• wao: baura: hai (He is a moron)
• baurane: kahe: hau: dadda: (Why are you behaving like a moron?)

Baura is an abstract noun. In the first sentence baura: is used as an abstract noun. After conversion it started being used as a verb also, as in the second sentence.

In suppletion another relative form of a word is formed without any morpho-phonological similarities with the previous one. These forms do not relate morphologically or phonologically. For example:

ja:t and gao:

ja:t - ham ja:t hai

gao: - wao gao: hato

‘ja:t’ is present participle for very ‘go’ whereas ‘gao:’ is the past participle form.

Reduplication is a very common process of word formation in Kannauji. Most of the reduplicated forms are made by adjectival and nominal words. This is not a productive type of word formation process; instead it adds stylistic effect in conversation. For example:

ghare-ghare

Here ghare is formed following the word ghare so it is an example of reduplication.

Echo formation is a similar process to reduplication. In echo formation, a similar-sounding word is made from nominal and adjectival. There is no logic behind why this formation is done but it increases the stylistic effectiveness of conversation. For example:

tasla-wasla

Here wasla, a similar-sounding word is formed after word tasla so it is an example of eco formation process. Some other examples are

• haldi-waldi
• ata-wata

In metaphor a word is objected on another one because of some similarity. In metaphoric expansion a word is used in different situations and environments due to one similar quality. The meaning of a word is expanded metaphorically in this word formation process. For example:

dama:d → sarka:r ko dama:d

dama:d is a person who is preferred very much in his/her in-laws family/house. So sarka:r ko dama:d is used to refer a person who is favoured very much by government. Here is another example of metaphoric expansion-

shekhchil͜li: → gao ke shekhchil͜li:

Onomatopoeic words are supposed as absolute or original words. They sound like the actions and things they are related to. For example:

• khatar-patar It is a sound made by friction of two heavy objects.
• dhum-dhama:ko: It sounds similar to firing something.
• satar-patar

1. http://www.sumania.com/lang/allindi4.html
2. Dwivedi, Pankaj; Kar, Somdev (2016). "Kanauji of Kanpur: A Brief Overview". Acta Linguistica Asiatica. 6 (1): 101–119. doi:10.4312/ala.6.1.101-119.
3. Dwivedi, P., & Kar, S. (2017). On documenting low resourced Indian languages insights from Kanauji speech corpus. Dialectologia: revista electrònica, (19), 67-91. https://www.raco.cat/index.php/Dialectologia/article/view/328489
4. Dwivedi, P., & Kar, S. (September 2016). SOCIOLINGUISTICS AND PHONOLOGY OF KANAUJI. In International Conference on Hindi Studies. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Pankaj_Dwivedi4/publication/308198142_Sociolinguistics_and_Phonology_of_Kanauji/links/57ea51bd08aed0a291332dc2.pdf
5. Dwivedi, P. &Kar, S. (2018). Phonology of Kanauji. In Sharma, Ghanshyam (Eds.) Advances in Hindi Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (1). 189-220. Germany: Lincom Europa.