Toxic epidermal necrolysis

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a type of severe skin reaction.[2] Together with Stevens–Johnson syndrome (SJS) it forms a spectrum of disease, with TEN being more severe.[2] Early symptoms include fever and flu-like symptoms.[2] A few days later the skin begins to blister and peel forming painful raw areas.[2] Mucous membranes, such as the mouth, are also typically involved.[2] Complications include dehydration, sepsis, pneumonia, and multiple organ failure.[2]

Toxic epidermal necrolysis
Other namesLyell syndrome, Lyell's syndrome[1]
Characteristic skin loss of toxic epidermal necrolysis
SpecialtyDermatology
SymptomsFever, skin blisters, skin peeling, painful skin, red eyes[2]
ComplicationsDehydration, sepsis, pneumonia, multiple organ failure.[2]
Usual onsetAge > 40[3]
Risk factorsHIV/AIDS, systemic lupus erythematosus, genetics[2]
Diagnostic method> 30% of the skin involved, skin biopsy[3]
Differential diagnosisChickenpox, staphylococcal epidermolysis, staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome, autoimmune bullous disease[3]
TreatmentHospitalization, stopping the cause, pain medication[3]
PrognosisMortality 20–50%[2][3]
Frequency1–2 per million per year (together with SJS)[2]

The most common cause is certain medications such as lamotrigine, carbamazepine, allopurinol, sulfonamide antibiotics, and nevirapine.[2] Other causes can include infections such as Mycoplasma pneumoniae and cytomegalovirus or the cause may remain unknown.[3][4] Risk factors include HIV/AIDS and systemic lupus erythematosus.[2] Diagnosis is based on a skin biopsy and involvement of more than 30% of the skin.[3] TEN is a type of severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs), together with SJS, a SJS/TEN, and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms.[5] It is called SJS when less than 10% of the skin is involved and an intermediate form with 10 to 30% involvement.[3] Erythema multiforme (EM) is generally considered a separate condition.[6]

Treatment typically takes place in hospital such as in a burn unit or intensive care unit.[3][7] Efforts include stopping the cause, pain medication, and antihistamines.[3][4] Antibiotics, intravenous immunoglobulins, and corticosteroids may also be used.[3][4] Treatments do not typically change the course of the underlying disease.[3] Together with SJS it affects 1 to 2 persons per million per year.[2] It is more common in females than males.[3] Typical onset is over the age of 40.[3] Skin usually regrows over two to three weeks; however, recovery can take months and most are left with chronic problems.[3][4]

Signs and symptoms

Prodrome

TEN ultimately results in extensive skin involvement with redness, necrosis, and detachment of the top (epidermal) layer of the skin and mucosa. Before these severe findings develop, people often have a flu-like prodrome, with a cough, runny nose, fever, decreased appetite and malaise. A history of drug exposure exists on average 14 days (ranging from 1–4 weeks) prior to the onset of symptoms, but may result as early as 48 hours if it is a reexposure.[8]

Skin findings

Initial skin findings include red-purple, dusky, flat spots known as macules that start on the trunk and spread out from there. These skin lesions then transform into large blisters. The affected skin can then become necrotic or sag from the body and peel off in great swaths.[7]

  • Toxic epidermal necrolysis on legs
  • The emerging blisters on day 4 of an instance of TENs
  • The back of a TENs patient on day 10, at the peak of the condition

Mucosal findings

Nearly all people with TEN have oral, eye and genital involvement as well. Painful crusts and erosions may develop on any mucosal surface.[9] The mouth becomes blistered and eroded, making eating difficult and sometimes necessitating feeding through a nasogastric tube through the nose or a gastric tube directly into the stomach. The eyes can become swollen, crusted, and ulcerated, leading to potential blindness. The most common problem with the eyes is severe conjunctivitis.[10]

Complications

Those who survive the acute phase of TEN often develop long-term complications affecting the skin and eyes. Skin manifestations can include scarring, eruptive melanocytic nevi, vulvovaginal stenosis, and dyspareunia. The epithelium of the trachea, bronchi, or gastrointestinal tract may be involved in SJS and TEN.[11] Ocular symptoms are the most common complication in TEN, experienced by 20–79% of those with TEN, even by those who do not experience immediate ocular manifestations. These can include dry eyes, photophobia, symblepharon, corneal scarring or xerosis, subconjunctival fibrosis, trichiasis, decreased visual acuity, and blindness.[12]

Cause

Drug reactions have been reported to cause 80–95% of TEN cases.[6]

The drugs most often implicated in TEN are:

TEN has also been reported to result from infection with Mycoplasma pneumoniae or dengue virus. Contrast agents used in imaging studies as well as transplantation of bone marrow or organs have also been linked to TEN development.[13][6]

HIV

HIV-positive individuals have 1000 times the risk of developing SJS/TEN compared to the general population. The reason for this increased risk is not clear.[7]

Genetics

Certain genetic factors are associated with increased risk of TEN. For example, certain HLA-types such as, HLA-B*1502,[14] HLA-A*3101,[15] HLA-B*5801,[16] and HLA‐B*57:01[17] have been seen to be linked with TEN development when exposed to specific drugs.

Pathogenesis

The immune system's role in the precise pathogenesis of TEN remains unclear. It appears that a certain type of immune cell (cytotoxic CD8+ T cell) is primarily responsible for keratinocyte death and subsequent skin detachment. Keratinocytes are the cells found lower in the epidermis and specialize in holding the surrounding skin cells together. It is theorized that CD8+ immune cells become overactive by stimulation from drugs or drug metabolites. CD8+ T cells then mediate keratinocyte cell death through release of a number of molecules, including perforin, granzyme B, and granulysin. Other agents, including tumor necrosis factor alpha and Fas ligand, also appear to be involved in TEN pathogenesis.[6]

Diagnosis

The diagnosis of TEN is based on both clinical and histologic findings. Early TEN can resemble non-specific drug reactions, so clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for TEN. The presence of oral, ocular, and/or genital mucositis is helpful diagnostically, as these findings are present in nearly all patients with TEN. The Nikolsky sign (a separation of the papillary dermis from the basal layer upon gentle lateral pressure) and the Asboe-Hansen sign (a lateral extension of bullae with pressure) are also helpful diagnostic signs found in patients with TEN.[7]

Given the significant morbidity and mortality from TEN, as well as improvement in outcome from prompt treatment, there is significant interest in the discovery of serum biomarkers for early diagnosis of TEN. Serum granulysin and serum high-mobility group protein B1 (HMGB1) are among a few of the markers being investigated which have shown promise in early research.[7]

Histology

Definitive diagnosis of TEN often requires biopsy confirmation. Histologically, early TEN shows scattered necrotic keratinocytes. In more advanced TEN, full thickness epidermal necrosis is visualized, with a subepidermal split, and scant inflammatory infiltrate in the papillary dermis. Epidermal necrosis found on histology is a sensitive but nonspecific finding for TEN.[7]

  • Confluent Epidermal Necrosis, low mag
  • Confluent Epidermal Necrosis, high mag

Differential diagnosis

Treatment

The primary treatment of TEN is discontinuation of the causative factor(s), usually an offending drug, early referral and management in burn units or intensive care units, supportive management, and nutritional support.[7]

Current literature does not convincingly support use of any adjuvant systemic therapy. Initial interest in Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) came from research showing that IVIG could inhibit Fas-FasL mediated keratinocyte apoptosis in vitro.[19] Unfortunately, research studies reveal conflicting support for use of IVIG in treatment of TEN.[20] Ability to draw more generalized conclusions from research to date has been limited by lack of controlled trials, and inconsistency in study design in terms of disease severity, IVIG dose, and timing of IVIG administration.[7] Larger, high quality trials are needed to assess the actual benefit of IVIG in TEN.

Numerous other adjuvant therapies have been tried in TEN including, corticosteroids, ciclosporin, cyclophosphamide, plasmapheresis, pentoxifylline, acetylcysteine, ulinastatin, infliximab, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (if TEN associated-leukopenia exists). There is mixed evidence for use of corticosteroids and scant evidence for the other therapies.[7] A meta-analysis from 2002 concluded that there is no reliable evidence for the treatment of TEN.[21] Thalidomide did not show any benefit and was associated with increased mortality compared with placebo.[21]

Prognosis

The mortality for toxic epidermal necrolysis is 25–30%.[7] People with SJS or TEN caused by a medication have a better prognosis the earlier the causative medication is withdrawn.[11] Loss of the skin leaves patients vulnerable to infections from fungi and bacteria, and can result in sepsis, the leading cause of death in the disease.[13] Death is caused either by infection or by respiratory distress which is either due to pneumonia or damage to the linings of the airway. Microscopic analysis of tissue (especially the degree of dermal mononuclear inflammation and the degree of inflammation in general) can play a role in determining the prognosis of individual cases.[22]

Severity score

The "Severity of Illness Score for Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis" (SCORTEN) is a scoring system developed to assess the severity of TEN and predict mortality in patients with acute TEN.[23]

One point is given for each of the following factors:[12]

  • age >40
  • heart rate >120 beats/minute
  • carrying diagnosis of cancer
  • separation of epidermis on more than ten percent of body surface area (BSA) on day 1.
  • Blood Urea Nitrogen >28 mg/dL
  • Glucose >252 mg/dL (14 mmol/L)
  • Bicarbonate <20mEq/L

Score
  • 0–1: 3.2% mortality
  • 2: 12.2% mortality
  • 3: 35.3% mortality
  • 4: 58.3% mortality
  • ≥5: 90% mortality

Of note, this scoring system is most valuable when used on the first and third day of hospitalization, and it may underestimate mortality in patients with respiratory symptoms.[12]

References
  1. Rapini, Ronald P.; Bolognia, Jean L.; Jorizzo, Joseph L. (2007). Dermatology: 2-Volume Set. St. Louis: Mosby. ISBN 978-1-4160-2999-1.
  2. "Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis". Genetics Home Reference. July 2015. Archived from the original on 27 April 2017. Retrieved 26 April 2017.
  3. "Orphanet: Toxic epidermal necrolysis". Orphanet. November 2008. Archived from the original on 27 April 2017. Retrieved 26 April 2017.
  4. "Stevens-Johnson syndrome". GARD. Archived from the original on 28 August 2016. Retrieved 26 August 2016.
  5. Adler NR, Aung AK, Ergen EN, Trubiano J, Goh MS, Phillips EJ (2017). "Recent advances in the understanding of severe cutaneous adverse reactions". The British Journal of Dermatology. 177 (5): 1234–1247. doi:10.1111/bjd.15423. PMC 5582023. PMID 28256714.
  6. Schwartz, RA; McDonough, PH; Lee, BW (August 2013). "Toxic epidermal necrolysis: Part I. Introduction, history, classification, clinical features, systemic manifestations, etiology, and immunopathogenesis". Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 69 (2): 173.e1–13, quiz 185–6. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2013.05.003. PMID 23866878.
  7. Schwartz, RA; McDonough, PH; Lee, BW (August 2013). "Toxic epidermal necrolysis: Part II. Prognosis, sequelae, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, prevention, and treatment". Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 69 (2): 187.e1–16, quiz 203–4. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2013.05.002. PMID 23866879.
  8. Jordan, MH; Lewis, MS; Jeng, JG; Rees, JM (1991). "Treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis by burn units: another market or another threat?". The Journal of Burn Care & Rehabilitation. 12 (6): 579–81. doi:10.1097/00004630-199111000-00015. PMID 1779014.
  9. Roujeau, JC; Stern, RS (10 November 1994). "Severe adverse cutaneous reactions to drugs". The New England Journal of Medicine. 331 (19): 1272–85. doi:10.1056/nejm199411103311906. PMID 7794310.
  10. Morales, ME; Purdue, GF; Verity, SM; Arnoldo, BD; Blomquist, PH (October 2010). "Ophthalmic Manifestations of Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis and Relation to SCORTEN". American Journal of Ophthalmology. 150 (4): 505–510.e1. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2010.04.026. PMID 20619392.
  11. Maverakis, Emanual; Wang, Elizabeth A.; Shinkai, Kanade; Mahasirimongkol, Surakameth; Margolis, David J.; Avigan, Mark; Chung, Wen-Hung; Goldman, Jennifer; Grenade, Lois La (2017-06-01). "Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Standard Reporting and Evaluation Guidelines: Results of a National Institutes of Health Working Group" (PDF). JAMA Dermatology. 153 (6): 587–592. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.0160. ISSN 2168-6068. PMID 28296986. S2CID 205110875. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2019-12-03. Retrieved 2019-12-12.
  12. DeMers, G; Meurer, WJ; Shih, R; Rosenbaum, S; Vilke, GM (December 2012). "Tissue plasminogen activator and stroke: review of the literature for the clinician". The Journal of Emergency Medicine. 43 (6): 1149–54. doi:10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.05.005. PMID 22818644.
  13. Garra, GP (2007). "Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Archived 2007-12-27 at the Wayback Machine". Emedicine.com. Retrieved on December 13, 2007.
  14. Hung, SI; Chung, WH; Jee, SH; Chen, WC; Chang, YT; Lee, WR; Hu, SL; Wu, MT; Chen, GS; Wong, TW; Hsiao, PF; Chen, WH; Shih, HY; Fang, WH; Wei, CY; Lou, YH; Huang, YL; Lin, JJ; Chen, YT (April 2006). "Genetic susceptibility to carbamazepine-induced cutaneous adverse drug reactions". Pharmacogenetics and Genomics. 16 (4): 297–306. doi:10.1097/01.fpc.0000199500.46842.4a. PMID 16538176. S2CID 45667604.
  15. McCormack, M; Alfirevic, A; Bourgeois, S; Farrell, JJ; Kasperavičiūtė, D; Carrington, M; Sills, GJ; Marson, T; Jia, X; de Bakker, PI; Chinthapalli, K; Molokhia, M; Johnson, MR; O'Connor, GD; Chaila, E; Alhusaini, S; Shianna, KV; Radtke, RA; Heinzen, EL; Walley, N; Pandolfo, M; Pichler, W; Park, BK; Depondt, C; Sisodiya, SM; Goldstein, DB; Deloukas, P; Delanty, N; Cavalleri, GL; Pirmohamed, M (24 March 2011). "HLA-A*3101 and carbamazepine-induced hypersensitivity reactions in Europeans". The New England Journal of Medicine. 364 (12): 1134–43. doi:10.1056/nejmoa1013297. PMC 3113609. PMID 21428769.
  16. Tohkin, M; Kaniwa, N; Saito, Y; Sugiyama, E; Kurose, K; Nishikawa, J; Hasegawa, R; Aihara, M; Matsunaga, K; Abe, M; Furuya, H; Takahashi, Y; Ikeda, H; Muramatsu, M; Ueta, M; Sotozono, C; Kinoshita, S; Ikezawa, Z; Japan Pharmacogenomics Data Science, Consortium (February 2013). "A whole-genome association study of major determinants for allopurinol-related Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in Japanese patients". The Pharmacogenomics Journal. 13 (1): 60–9. doi:10.1038/tpj.2011.41. PMID 21912425.
  17. Alfirevic, Ana; Pirmohamed, Munir; Marinovic, Branka; Harcourt-Smith, Linda; Jorgensen, Andrea L; Cooper, Tess E (17 July 2019). "Genetic testing for prevention of severe drug-induced skin rash". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 7: CD010891. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD010891.pub2. PMC 6636675. PMID 31314143.
  18. Schwartz, RA; McDonough, PH; Lee, BW (Aug 2013). "Toxic epidermal necrolysis: Part II. Prognosis, sequelae, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, prevention, and treatment". Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 69 (2): 187.e1–16, quiz 203–4. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2013.05.002. PMID 23866879.
  19. Zajicek, R; Pintar, D; Broz, L; Suca, H; Königova, R (May 2012). "Toxic epidermal necrolysis and Stevens-Johnson syndrome at the Prague Burn Centre 1998-2008". Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 26 (5): 639–43. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04143.x. PMID 21668825. S2CID 25253929.
  20. Rajaratnam R, Mann C, Balasubramaniam P, et al. (December 2010). "Toxic epidermal necrolysis: retrospective analysis of 21 consecutive cases managed at a tertiary centre". Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 35 (8): 853–62. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2230.2010.03826.x. PMID 20456393. S2CID 1477097.
  21. Majumdar, Samit; Mockenhaupt, Maja; Roujeau, Jean-Claude; Townshend, Askari P (2002-10-21). "Interventions for toxic epidermal necrolysis". Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2015 (4): CD001435. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001435. ISSN 1465-1858. PMC 8958873. PMID 12519556. Archived from the original on 2018-06-25. Retrieved 2018-06-25.
  22. Quinn AM; Brown, K; Bonish, BK; Curry, J; Gordon, KB; Sinacore, J; Gamelli, R; Nickoloff, BJ; et al. (2005). "Uncovering histological criteria with prognostic significance in toxic epidermal necrolysis". Arch Dermatol. 141 (6): 683–7. doi:10.1001/archderm.141.6.683. PMID 15967913.
  23. Schwartz, RA; McDonough, PH; Lee, BW (August 2013). "Toxic epidermal necrolysis: Part II. Prognosis, sequelae, diagnosis, differential diagnosis, prevention, and treatment". Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 69 (2): 187.e1–16, quiz 203–4. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2013.05.002. PMID 23866879.
This article is issued from Wikipedia. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.