Umbilical cord prolapse

The first sign of umbilical cord prolapse is usually a sudden and severe decrease in fetal heart rate that does not immediately resolve. On fetal heart tracing (a linear recording of the fetal heart rate) this would usually look like moderate to severe variable decelerations.[6] In overt cord prolapse, the cord can be seen or felt on the vulva or vagina.[1]

A majority of umbilical cord prolapse cases happen during the second stage of labor.[7]

Risk factors that are associated with umbilical cord prolapse tend to make it difficult for the baby from appropriately engaging and filling the maternal pelvis or are related to abnormalities of the umbilical cord. The two major categories of risk factors are spontaneous and iatrogenic (those that result from medical intervention).

• spontaneous factors:
  • fetal malpresentation:[8] abnormal fetal lie tends to result in space below the baby in the maternal pelvis, which can then be occupied by the cord.
  • polyhydramnios, or an abnormally high amount of amniotic fluid[8]
  • prematurity: likely related to increased chance of malpresentation and relative polyhydramnios.[8]
  • low birth weight:[9] usually described as <2500g at birth, though some studies will use <1500g. Cause is likely similar to those for prematurity.
  • multiple gestation, or being pregnant with more than one baby at a given time:[9] more likely to occur in the baby that is not born first.
  • spontaneous rupture of membranes:[10] about half of prolapses occur within 5 minutes of membrane rupture, two-thirds within 1 hour, 95% within 24 hours.
• treatment associated factors:
  • artificial rupture of membranes[11]
  • placement of internal monitors (for example, internal scalp electrode or intrauterine pressure catheter)[11]
  • manual rotation of fetal head[11]

Umbilical cord prolapse should always be considered a possibility when there is a sudden decrease in fetal heart rate or variable decelerations, particularly after the rupture of membranes. With overt prolapses, the diagnosis can be confirmed if the cord can be felt on vaginal examination. Without overt prolapse, the diagnosis can only be confirmed after a cesarean section, though even then it will not always be evident at time of procedure.[12]

The knee-chest position is typically recommended[2]

The typical treatment of umbilical cord prolapse in the setting of a viable pregnancy involves immediate delivery by the quickest and safest route possible. This usually requires cesarean section, especially if the woman is in early labor. Occasionally, vaginal delivery will be attempted if clinical judgment determines that is a safer or quicker method.[12]

Other interventions during management of cord prolapse are typically used to decrease the chance of complications while preparations for delivery are being made. These interventions are focused on reducing pressure on the cord to prevent fetal complications from cord compression. The following maneuvers are among those used in clinical practice:

• Manual elevation of the presenting fetal part.[1]
• Repositioning of the mother to be in the knee-chest position or Trendelenburg position (head down with feet elevated), lying on left side is usually preferred.[1]
• Filling of the bladder using a foley catheter can help elevate the presenting fetal part and lift it off the cord.[12]
• Use of tocolytics (medications to suppress labor) have been proposed, usually done in addition to bladder filling rather than as a stand-alone intervention.[13]

If the mother is far from delivery, funic reduction (manually placing the cord back into the uterine cavity) has been attempted,[14] with successful cases reported.[15] However, this is not currently recommended by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), as there is insufficient evidence to support this maneuver.[1]

The primary concern with umbilical cord prolapse is inadequate blood supply, and thus oxygen, to the baby if the cord becomes compressed. The cord can become compressed either due to mechanical pressure (usually from the presenting fetal part) or from sudden contraction of the vessels due to decreased temperatures in the vagina in comparison to the uterus.[12] This can lead to death of the baby or other complications.

Historically, the rate of fetal death in the setting of cord prolapse has been as high 40%.[16] However, these estimates occurred in the context of home or births outside of the hospital. When considering cord prolapses that have occurred in inpatient labor and delivery settings, the rate drops to as low as 0-3%,[12] though the mortality rate remains higher than for babies without cord prolapse. The reduction in mortality for hospital births is likely due to the ready availability of immediate cesarean section.

Many other fetal outcomes have been studied, including Apgar score (a quick assessment of a newborn's health status) at 5 minutes and length of hospitalization after delivery. While both measures are worse for newborns delivered after cord prolapse,[8] it is unclear what effect this has in the long-term. Relatively large studies that have tried to quantify long-term effects of cord prolapse on children found that less than 1% (1 in 120 studied) had a major neurologic disability,[10] and less than 1% (110 in 16,675) had diagnosed cerebral palsy.[17]

Rates of umbilical cord prolapse ranges from 0.1 to 0.6% of all pregnancies.[12][16] This rate has remained stable over time. A recent study estimates 77% of cord prolapses occur in singleton pregnancies (where there is only one baby). In twin pregnancies, cord prolapses occur more frequently in the second twin to be delivered, with 9% in the first twin and 14% in the second twin.[10]