Eosinophilic myocarditis

Eosinophilic myocarditis
Biopsy shows remarkable eosinophilic cell infiltration at interstitium of myocardium and necrosis of myocardium
SpecialtyCardiology

Eosinophilic myocarditis is inflammation in the heart muscle that is caused by the infiltration and destructive activity of a type of white blood cell, the eosinophil. Typically, the disorder is associated with hypereosinophilia, i.e. an eosinophil blood cell count greater than 1,500 per microliter (normal 100 to 400 per microliter). It is distinguished from non-eosinophilic myocarditis, which is heart inflammation caused by other types of white blood cells, i.e. lymphocytes and monocytes, as well as the respective descendants of these cells, NK cells and macrophages. This distinction is important because the eosinophil-based disorder is due to a particular set of underlying diseases and its preferred treatments differ from those for non-eosinophilic myocarditis.[1][2]

Eosinophilic myocarditis is often viewed as a disorder that has three progressive stages. The first stage of eosinophilic myocarditis involves acute inflammation and cardiac cell necrosis (i.e. areas of dead cells); it is dominated by symptoms characterized as the acute coronary syndrome such as angina, heart attack and/or congestive heart failure. The second stage is a thrombotic stage wherein the endocardium (i.e. interior wall) of the diseased heart forms blood clots which break off, travel in, and block blood through systemic or pulmonary arteries; this stage may dominate the initial presentation in some individuals. The third stage is a fibrotic stage wherein scarring replaces damaged heart muscle tissue to cause a clinical presentation dominated by a poorly contracting heart and cardiac valve disease.[3][4][5] Perhaps less commonly, eosinophilic myocarditis, eosinophilic thrombotic myocarditis, and eosinophilic fibrotic myocarditis are viewed as three separate but sequentially linked disorders in a spectrum of disorders termed eosinophilic cardiac diseases.[1] The focus here is on eosinophilic myocarditis as a distinct disorder separate from its thrombotic and fibrotic sequelae.

Eosinophilic myocarditis is a rare disorder. It is usually associated with, and considered secondary to, an underlying cause for the pathological behavior of the eosinophils such a toxic reaction to a drug (one of its more common causes in developed nations), the consequence of certain types of parasite and protozoan infections (a more common cause of the disorder in areas with these infestations), or the result of excessively high levels of activated blood eosinophils due to a wide range of other causes.[6] The specific treatment (i.e. treatment other than measures to support the cardiovascular system) of eosinphilic myocarditis differs from the specific treatment of other forms of myocarditis in that it is focused on relieving the underlying reason for the excessively high numbers and hyperactivity of eosinophils as well as on inhibiting the pathological actions of these cells.[6][7][8]

Signs and symptoms

Symptoms in eosinophilic myocarditis are highly variable. They tend to reflect the many underlying disorders causing eosinophil dysfunction as well as the widely differing progression rates of cardiac damage. Before cardiac symptoms are detected, some 66% of cases have symptoms of a common cold and 33% have symptoms of asthma, rhinitis, urticarial, or other allergic disorder. Cardiac manifestations of eosinophilic myocarditis range from none to life-threatening conditions such as cardiogenic shock or sudden death due to abnormal heart rhythms. More commonly the presenting cardiac symptoms of the disorder are the same as those seen in other forms of heart disease: chest pain, shortness of breath, fatigue, chest palpitations, light headedness, and syncope.[7] In its most extreme form, however, eosinophilic myocarditis can present as acute necrotizing eosinophilic myocarditis, i.e. with symptoms of chaotic and potentially lethal heart failure and heart arrhythmias. This rarest form of the disorder reflects a rapidly progressive and extensive eosinophilic infiltration of the heart that is accompanied by massive myocardial cell necrosis.[1][9]

Hypereosinophilia (i.e. blood eosinophil counts at or above 1,500 per microliter) or, less commonly, eosinophilia (counts above 500 but below 1,500 per microliter) are found in the vast majority of cases of eosinophilic myocarditis and are valuable clues that point to this rather than other types of myocarditis or myocardial injuries. However, elevated blood eosinophil counts may not occur during the early phase of the disorder. Other, less specific laboratory findings implicate a cardiac disorder but not necessarily eosinophilic myocarditis. These include elevations in blood markers for systemic inflammation (e.g. C reactive protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate), elevations in blood markers for cardiac injury (e.g. creatine kinase, troponins); and abnormal electrocardiograms ( mostly ST segment-T wave abnormalities).[7]

Cause

There are many causes of eosinophilia that may underlie eosinophilic myocarditis. These causes are classified as primary (i.e. a defect intrinsic to the eosinophil cell line), secondary (induced by an underlying disorder that stimulates the proliferation and activation of eosinophils), or idiopathic (i.e. unknown cause). Non-idiopathic causes of the disorder are sub-classified into various forms of allergic, autoimmune, infectious, or malignant diseases and hypersensitivity reactions to drugs, vaccines, or transplanted hearts. While virtually any cause for the elevation and activation of blood eosinophils must be considered as a potential cause for eosinophilic myocarditis, the following list gives the principal types of eosinophilia known or thought to underlie the disorder.

Primary conditions that may lead to eosinophilic myocarditis are:

Secondary conditions that may lead to eosinophilic myocarditis are:

DRESS syndrome

Main article: DRESS syndrome

The DRESS syndrome (Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms) is a severe immunological drug reaction. It differs from other drug reactions in that it: a) is caused by a particular set of drugs; b) typically occurs after a delay of 2 to 8 weeks following intake of an offending drug; c) presents with a specific set of signs and symptoms (i.e. modest or extreme elevations in blood eosinophil and atypical lymphocyte counts; acute onset of a skin rash; lymphadenopathy; fever; neuralgia; and involvement of at least one internal organ such as the liver, lung, or heart; d) develops in individuals with particular genetic predispositions; and e) involves reactivation of latent viruses, most commonly human herpesvirus 6 or more rarely human herpes virus 5 (i.e. human cytomegalovirus), human herpesvirus 7, and human herpesvirus 4 (i.e. Epstein–Barr virus). These viruses usually become dormant after infecting humans but under special circumstances, such as drug intake, are reactivated and may contribute to serious diseases such as the DRESS syndrome.[20][21]

Pathophysiology

Eosinophils normally function to neutralize invading microbes, primarily parasites but also certain types of fungi and viruses. In conducting these functions, eosinophils normally occupy the gastrointestinal tract, respiratory tract, and skin where they produce and release on demand a range of toxic reactive oxygen species (e.g. hypobromite, hypobromous acid, superoxide, and peroxide) and also release on demand a preformed armamentarium of chemical signals including cytokines, chemokines, growth factors, lipid mediators (e.g. leukotrienes, prostaglandins, platelet activating factor, 5-oxo-eicosatetraenoic acid), and toxic proteins (e.g. metalloproteinases, major basic protein, eosinophil cationic protein, eosinophil peroxidase, and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin). These agents serve to orchestrate robust inflammatory responses that destroy invading microorganisms. Eosinophils also participate in transplant rejection, Graft-versus-host disease, the destruction or walling off of foreign objects, and the killing of cancer cells. In conducting these functions, eosinophils enter tissues that they do not normally occupy.

When overproduced and over-activated, such as in cases of eosinophilic myocarditis, eosinophils behave as though they were attacking a foreign or malignant tissue: they enter a seemingly normal organ such as the heart, misdirect their reactive oxygen species and armamentarium of preformed molecules toward seemingly normal tissue such as heart muscle, and thereby produce serious damage such as heart failure.[1][22][23][24] Animal model studies suggest reasons why eosinophils are directed to and injure the heart muscle. Mice made hypereosinophilic by the forced overexpression of an interleukin-5 transgene (interleukin 5 stimulates eosinophil proliferation, activation, and migration) develop eosinophilic myocarditis. A similar eosinophilic endocarditis occurs in mice immunized with the cardiac muscle protein, mouse myosin. In the latter model, endocarditis is reduced by inhibiting the cytokine interleukin-4 or eosinophils and is exacerbated by concurrently blocking two cytokines, interferon gamma and interleukin-17A. Finally, certain eosinophil-attracting agents, viz., eotaxins, are elevated in the cardiac tissue of myosin-immunized mice that are concurrently depleted of interferon gamma and interleukin-17A. Eotaxins are also elevated in the cardiac muscle biopsy specimens of individuals with eosinphilic myocarditis compared to their levels in non-eosinophiliic myocarditis. These findings suggest that eosinophilic myocarditis is caused by the abnormal proliferation and activation of eosinophils and that their directional migration into the heart is evoked by a set of cytokines and chemoattractants in mice and possibly humans.[3]

Diagnosis

In eosinophilic myocarditis, echocardiography typically gives non-specific and only occasional findings of endocardium thickening, left ventricular hypertrophy, left ventricle dilation, and involvement of the mitral and/or tricuspid valves. However, in acute necrotizing eosinophilic myocarditis, echocardiography usually gives diagnostically helpful evidence of a non-enlarged heart with a thickened and poorly contracting left ventricle. Gadolinium-based cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is the most useful non-invasive procedure for diagnosing eosinophilic myocarditis. It supports this diagnosis if it shows at least two of the following abnormalities: a) an increased signal in T2-weighted images; b) an increased global myocardial early enhancement ratio between myocardial and skeletal muscle in enhanced T1 images and c) one or more focal enhancements distributed in a non-vascular pattern in late enhanced T1-weighted images. Additionally, and unlike in other forms of myocarditis, eosinophilic myocarditis may also show enhanced gadolinium uptake in the sub-endocardium.[1][7] However, the only definitive test for eosinophilic myocarditis is cardiac muscle biopsy showing the presence of eosinophilic infiltration. Since the disorder may be patchy, multiple tissue samples taken during the procedure improve the chances of uncovering the pathology but in any case, negative results do not exclude the diagnosis.[5][7]

Eosinophilic coronary periarteritis

Eosinophilic coronary periarteritis is an extremely rare heart disorder caused by extensive eosinophilic infiltration of the adventitia and periadventitia, i.e. the soft tissues, surrounding the coronary arteries. The intima, tunica media, and tunica intima layers of these arteries remain intact and are generally unaffected. Thus, this disorder is characterized by episodes of angina, particularly Prinzmetal's angina, and chaotic heart arrhythmias which may lead to sudden death. The disorder is considered distinct from eosinophilic myocarditis as well as other forms of inflammatory arterial disorders in that it is limited to the coronary artery system.[1][25]

Treatment

Due to its rarity, no comprehensive treatment studies on eosinophilic myocarditis have been conducted. Small studies and case reports have directed efforts towards: a) supporting cardiac function by relieving heart failure and suppressing life-threatening abnormal heart rhythms; b) suppressing eosinophil-based cardiac inflammation; and c) treating the underlying disorder. In all cases of symptomatic eosinophilic myocarditis that lack specific treatment regimens for the underlying disorder, available studies recommend treating the inflammatory component of this disorder with non-specific immunosuppressive drugs, principally high-dosage followed by slowly-tapering to a low-dosage maintenance corticosteroid regimens. It is recommended that affected individuals who fail this regimen or present with cardiogenic shock be treated with other non-specific immunosuppressive drugs viz., azathioprine or cyclophosphamide, as adjuncts to, or replacements for, corticosteroids. However, individuals with an underlying therapeutically accessible disease should be treated for this disease; in seriously symptomatic cases, such individuals may be treated concurrently with a corticosteroid regimen. Examples of diseases underlying eosinophilic myocarditis that are recommended for treatments directed at the underlying disease include:[6][7][12][26]

  • Infectious agents: specific drug treatment of helminth and protozoan infections typically takes precedence over non-specific immunosuppressive therapy, which, if used without specific treatment, could worsen the infection. In moderate-to-severe cases, non-specific immunosuppression is used in combination with specific drug treatment.
  • Toxic reactions to ingested agents: discontinuance of the ingested agent plus corticosteroids or other non-specific immunosuppressive regimens.
  • Clonal eosinophilia caused by mutations in genes that are highly susceptible to tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as PDGFRA, PDGFRB, or possibly FGFR1: first generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (e.g. imatinib) are recommended for the former two mutations; a later generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors, ponatinib, alone or combined with bone marrow transplantation, may be useful for treating the FGFR1 mutations.
  • Clonal hypereosinophilia due to mutations in other genes or primary malignancies: specific treatment regimens used for these pre-malignant or malignant diseases may be more useful and necessary than non-specific immunosuppression.
  • Allergic and autoimmune diseases: non-specific treatment regimens used for these diseases may be useful in place of a simple corticosteroid regimen. For example, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis can be successfully treated with mepolizumab.
  • Idiopathic hypereosinphilic syndrome and lymphocyte-variant hypereosinophilia: corticosteroids; for individuals with these hypereosinophilias that are refractory to or break through corticosteroid therapy and individuals requiring corticosteroid-sparing therapy, recommended alternative drug therapies include hydroxyurea, Pegylated interferon-α, and either one of two tyrosine kinase inhibitors viz., imatinib and mepolizumab).

Prognosis

The prognosis of eosinophilic myocarditis is anywhere from rapidly fatal to extremely chronic or non-fatal. Progression at a moderate rate over many months to years is the most common prognosis.[1][9] In addition to the speed of inflammation-based heart muscle injury, the prognosis of eosinophilc myocarditis may be dominated by that of its underlying cause. For example, an underlying malignant cause for the eosinophilia may be survival-limiting.[6][9]

History

In 1936, the famed Swiss physician Wilhem Löffler first described heart damage that appeared due to massive cardiac eosinophil infiltrations and was associated with excessively high levels of blood eosinophils. Subsequent cases of this disorder, termed Loeffler endocarditis, were found to occur in about 20% of individuals diagnosed with the hypereosinophilic syndrome. Loeffler's and the latter cases had pathological features of eosinophil infiltrations not only into the heart's myocardium but also its epicardium (i.e. lining of the heart chambers). Although eosinophilic myocarditis due to other underlying causes may show little or no eosinophil infiltrations into the endocardium, Loeffler endocarditis is considered an important form of the disorder.[4]

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Séguéla PE, Iriart X, Acar P, Montaudon M, Roudaut R, Thambo JB (2015). "Eosinophilic cardiac disease: Molecular, clinical and imaging aspects". Archives of Cardiovascular Diseases. 108 (4): 258–68. doi:10.1016/j.acvd.2015.01.006. PMID 25858537.
  2. ↑ Rose NR (2016). "Viral myocarditis". Current Opinion in Rheumatology. 28 (4): 383–9. doi:10.1097/BOR.0000000000000303. PMC 4948180. PMID 27166925.
  3. 1 2 Diny NL, Rose NR, Čiháková D (2017). "Eosinophils in Autoimmune Diseases". Frontiers in Immunology. 8: 484. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2017.00484. PMC 5406413. PMID 28496445.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Cheung CC, Constantine M, Ahmadi A, Shiau C, Chen LY (2017). "Eosinophilic Myocarditis". The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. 354 (5): 486–492. doi:10.1016/j.amjms.2017.04.002. PMID 29173361. S2CID 205476783.
  5. 1 2 Li H, Dai Z, Wang B, Huang W (2015). "A case report of eosinophilic myocarditis and a review of the relevant literature". BMC Cardiovascular Disorders. 15: 15. doi:10.1186/s12872-015-0003-7. PMC 4359588. PMID 25887327.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Sohn KH, Song WJ, Kim BK, Kang MK, Lee SY, Suh JW, Yoon YE, Kim SH, Youn TJ, Cho SH, Chang YS (2015). "Eosinophilic myocarditis: case series and literature review". Asia Pacific Allergy. 5 (2): 123–7. doi:10.5415/apallergy.2015.5.2.123. PMC 4415178. PMID 25938077.
  7. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Kuchynka P, Palecek T, Masek M, Cerny V, Lambert L, Vitkova I, Linhart A (2016). "Current Diagnostic and Therapeutic Aspects of Eosinophilic Myocarditis". BioMed Research International. 2016: 1–6. doi:10.1155/2016/2829583. PMC 4738989. PMID 26885504.
  8. 1 2 Grimaldi A, Mocumbi AO, Freers J, Lachaud M, Mirabel M, Ferreira B, Narayanan K, Celermajer DS, Sidi D, Jouven X, Marijon E (2016). "Tropical Endomyocardial Fibrosis: Natural History, Challenges, and Perspectives". Circulation. 133 (24): 2503–15. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.021178. PMID 27297343. S2CID 29931.
  9. 1 2 3 Janík M, Krajčovič J, Straka Ľ, Hejna P, Novomeský F (2017). "Extensive myocardial infarction in a 20-year-old associated with diabetic ketoacidosis". Kardiologia Polska. 75 (10): 1051. doi:10.5603/KP.2017.0190. PMID 29057448.
  10. 1 2 3 Gotlib J (2017). "World Health Organization-defined eosinophilic disorders: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management". American Journal of Hematology. 92 (11): 1243–1259. doi:10.1002/ajh.24880. PMID 29044676.
  11. 1 2 Baandrup U (2012). "Eosinophilic myocarditis". Herz. 37 (8): 849–52. doi:10.1007/s00059-012-3701-2. PMID 23179050. S2CID 20358873.
  12. 1 2 Nunes MC, Guimarães Júnior MH, Diamantino AC, Gelape CL, Ferrari TC (2017). "Cardiac manifestations of parasitic diseases". Heart. 103 (9): 651–658. doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2016-309870. PMID 28285268. S2CID 206974794.
  13. ↑ Sentürk T, Özdemir B, Keçebaş M, Beşli F, Yesilbursa D, Serdar OA (2012). "Ascaris-induced eosinophilic myocarditis presenting as acute ST elevation myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock in a young woman". Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine (Hagerstown, Md.). 13 (3): 211–5. doi:10.2459/JCM.0b013e32833db0ca. PMID 20686412. S2CID 28967272.
  14. ↑ Luk A, Metawee M, Ahn E, Gustafsson F, Ross H, Butany J (2009). "Do clinical diagnoses correlate with pathological diagnoses in cardiac transplant patients? The importance of endomyocardial biopsy". The Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 25 (2): e48–54. doi:10.1016/S0828-282X(09)70484-2. PMC 2691918. PMID 19214301.
  15. ↑ Carranza-Rodríguez C, San-Román-Sánchez D, Marrero-Santiago H, Hernández-Cabrera M, Gil-Guillén C, Pisos-Álamo E, Jaén-Sánchez N, Pérez-Arellano JL (2017). "Endomyocardial involvement in asymptomatic sub-Saharan immigrants with helminth-related eosinophilia". PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 11 (2): e0005403. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005403. PMC 5342272. PMID 28234952.
  16. ↑ Zhang Y, Ma L (2017). "Repeated Prosthetic Mitral Valve Thrombosis in Fluke Infection Induced Hypereosinophilic Syndrome". The Annals of Thoracic Surgery. 103 (3): e259–e260. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.08.106. PMID 28219563.
  17. ↑ Oketch-Rabah HA, Roe AL, Gurley BJ, Griffiths JC, Giancaspro GI (2016). "The Importance of Quality Specifications in Safety Assessments of Amino Acids: The Cases of l-Tryptophan and l-Citrulline". The Journal of Nutrition. 146 (12): 2643S–2651S. doi:10.3945/jn.115.227280. PMID 27934657.
  18. ↑ Curtis C, Ogbogu PU (2015). "Evaluation and Differential Diagnosis of Persistent Marked Eosinophilia". Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America. 35 (3): 387–402. doi:10.1016/j.iac.2015.04.001. PMID 26209891.
  19. ↑ "Olanzapine: Drug Safety Communication - FDA Warns About Rare But Serious Skin Reactions". 10 May 2016
  20. ↑ Cho YT, Yang CW, Chu CY (2017). "Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS): An Interplay among Drugs, Viruses, and Immune System". International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 18 (6): 1243. doi:10.3390/ijms18061243. PMC 5486066. PMID 28598363.
  21. ↑ Corneli HM (2017). "DRESS Syndrome: Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms". Pediatric Emergency Care. 33 (7): 499–502. doi:10.1097/PEC.0000000000001188. PMID 28665896.
  22. ↑ Kovalszki A, Weller PF (2016). "Eosinophilia". Primary Care. 43 (4): 607–617. doi:10.1016/j.pop.2016.07.010. PMC 5293177. PMID 27866580.
  23. ↑ Roufosse F (2013). "L4. Eosinophils: how they contribute to endothelial damage and dysfunction". La Presse Médicale. 42 (4 Pt 2): 503–7. doi:10.1016/j.lpm.2013.01.005. PMID 23453213.
  24. ↑ Long H, Liao W, Wang L, Lu Q (2016). "A Player and Coordinator: The Versatile Roles of Eosinophils in the Immune System". Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy. 43 (2): 96–108. doi:10.1159/000445215. PMC 4872051. PMID 27226792.
  25. ↑ Kajihara H, Tachiyama Y, Hirose T, Takada A, Takata A, Saito K, Murai T, Yasui W (2013). "Eosinophilic coronary periarteritis (vasospastic angina and sudden death), a new type of coronary arteritis: report of seven autopsy cases and a review of the literature". Virchows Archiv. 462 (2): 239–48. doi:10.1007/s00428-012-1351-7. PMID 23232800. S2CID 32619275.
  26. ↑ Roufosse F (2015). "Management of Hypereosinophilic Syndromes". Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America. 35 (3): 561–75. doi:10.1016/j.iac.2015.05.006. PMID 26209900.
This article is issued from Offline. The text is licensed under Creative Commons - Attribution - Sharealike. Additional terms may apply for the media files.